finally we should note that we don't know where lisa page is currently working, but we are working on it, tucker. >> tucker: trace gallagher, 3:00 p.m., incurring all this week. good to see. back tomorrow, apm, sean hannity right now. >> sean: ra, tucker, thank you. welcome to "hannity," we start with a top news alert. a tonight bombshell story surrounding the deep state and the upcoming fisa report, expected one week from tonight. this might explain everything paired remember, we were supposed to be getting the fisa report in may, june, july, august, et cetera, et cetera. ag barr said he expected the report in may. if the report we are learning about tonight is true, we might now have an explanation for the entire hold up. look at this. "the washington post" is reporting that attorney general bill barr has expressed disagreement with the key finding i in the upcoming inspector general report surrounding the origins of the russia probe. first, that is a good thing,

because remember that is what the durum investigation is all about. at least the beginnings of that, but that is also become officially a criminal probe that has expanded into all things fisa and other things, and accordant to my sources tonight while the ig will confirm a ton of damning information, devastating information on the doj, the fbi, the fisa applications, apparently there has been some disagreement, a little unwillingness of the obama appointed inspector general to take the kneading steps to say one and one equals two. in other words, to bluntly say what it is. and by the way, behind the scenes i am told there has been a brutal back and forth, you can add simple math, right? apparently that line has been used numerous times. attorney general reportedly believes that there was not sufficient basis. and this is where the durum report comes into open

investigation into the trump campaign in 2016. horwitz allegedly expected to deliver a much different finding on that. even though that was not his early mandate. his mandate was to look into fisa abuse. this would explain the delay, after delay, after delay, and also the recent leaking that has been going on which has been rampant. assuming this is true of the obama appointed horwitz does not conclude on the basic issues that we all know to be established fact, premeditated fraud on the fisa court, repeatedly. at the end of the day, the ag is signaling that the durham report is where all of the action will be on everything. and we do need to remember a couple of important facts here. remember the inspector general has no power to convene a grand jury. has no power to bring indictments pit has no power to bring in charges. durum does have all of that power. and remember that this is now officially a criminal investigation that has expanded into many of the issues that will begin next week's report. and again, i hear it is very, just reading the facts.

also, another important thing to remember, horwitz already concluded both mccabe and comey lied. that they lacked candor. by the way, that was something that was a big deal when it was a trump associate. and by the way, and those two cases, nothing happened. remember? he made referrals, nothing happened. the ig does not make criminal referrals. he makes referrals to investigate. funny, because candor got michael cohen, paul manafort, most recently roger stone in times of trouble. the system is so corrupt, frankly, repulsive. we have a dual justice system in this country. and don't forget, this is what the attorney general signaled in a recent speech. i would argue that no attorney general of the united states would say this unless you know something we don't know. take a listen. >> immediately after president trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they called "the resistance."

and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool, and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch. and his administration. now, resistance is the language used to describe insurgency against rule imposed by an occupying military power. this is a very dangerous and indeed incendiary notion to import into the politics of the democratic republic. >> sean: i would buckle up as a country, that sounds as serious as it can get. much more on that straight ahead. lindsey graham, remember, it week from this wednesday, he will have horwitz before his committee and the senate and respond exclusively to this developing story tonight. also buckle up, the month of december is about to be one of the most pivotal times in modern america history. look at this, as we speak, house democrats, they have been on this quest for three years racing against the clock, because they want to wrap up

their half asked you craning impeachment charades since christmas. and many deep state bureaucrats are anxiously waiting the findings of a real investment into corruption and to the very of real abuse of power. the fisa report will be public one week from tonight, and now all of a sudden, softball interview appears at the daily based. they love me at that paper. the fbi attorney lisi page painting yourself as an innocent victim just trying to fight back against the president's unfounded attacks. let me educate the so-called journalists in the mob and the media. lisa page is neither innocent nor a victim. she carried out what was a lengthy affair with a top investigator at the fbi named peter strzok. their personal business is their business. but the two of them inserted the rampant political bias, yes, into highly sensitive top-notch investigations including the probe into hillary clinton's

secret server. by the way, if you want real obstruction, that would be the bleach bit that deleted subpoenaed emails, et cetera. in the collusion on the campaign against trump, the dossier. remember they were using their work phones and why robert mueller did not demand that they be handed over and we do a search of all of it is anybody's understanding. anyway, her and strzok were obsessing about their hatred for all things donald trump. remember, the spring of 2016, page texting that trump was a "low sony human being" referring to him as a giant [bleep]. peter strzok agreed tweeting "trump is an idiot. hillary clinton should win 1/0." over the texts unhinge, the agent bonding over compulsive hatred for donald trump, the plot to stop him from ever becoming president and on auguss after jim comey open his

counterintelligence investigation into the trump campaign after i would argue they gave hillary considerations that no american would ever get, lisa page said this desperate to text to her best friend, her bff lover. "trump is not ever going to become president, right?" strzok test back, no, no, we will stop it. a few days later telling page that i want to show the path that you throughout and consideration in andy's office that there is no way that he gets elected. i'm afraid we cannot take that risk. it is like an insurance policy in the likely event that you die before your 40. we will stop it. insurance policy. those are not text between two low level employees in the federal government. those were two of the most powerful individuals working at the highest levels of the fbi and involved in the rigged investigation into hillary clinton. in massive corruption scandal in itself. in fact, strzok was the lead investigator in the clinton

email probe, remember that he is interrogating hillary clinton, but she gets to bring two other people involved in the case for support. nobody else gets that consideration. and by the way, remember, they change the words yeah, to not be the legal standard. anyway, also leading the counter entail an cross fire hurricane into the trump campaign only days after they exonerated their favorite can i get only meant candidate that should win 100-0. lisa page was a close adviser to the director of the fbi andrew mccabe, august 2016 the pair was discussing ways to use an all-powerful position to stop donald trump, up and his presidency with their insurance policy at the ready in the unlikely event that trump beat their favorite candidate hillary clinton. and it was all done in an official capacity using their work phones. lisa page is not a victim. she resigned in disgrace. her lover, peter strzok, fired

by the fbi along with all of these other guys, fired, resigning, demoted. and robert mueller's former pit bull andrew weissmann, a long history of locking up innocent people, hiding exculpatory evidence. you want to prove, read cindy powell's book. licensed alive live. sticking up for his trump hater saying she did nothing wrong. shocking, the deep state, they support each other. >> lisa page has done nothing wrong. she has a first amendment right to speak, also as a federal employee. and it is just a fiction to think that jurors, judges, battle employees do not have political views. the issue is whether they act on them. people act on principle all the time. jurors do it, judges do it, federal prosecutors do it. and it is simply not the case to think that personal views are going to affect what a

prosecutor does. >> sean: pretty amazing, ms dnc, the conspiracy theory channel. amazing how andrew weissmann has turned into the great defender of cerebral liberties after leading a baseless witch hunt io president trump. as you can see, clearly the deep state is in panic mode ahead of not only the fisa report, but the durham criminal investigation, and it now all begins to make sense. the timing of page's interview is not a coincidence. neither is the person who interviewed her. foxnews.com, they point out page used and abusively biased trump hating writer to breaker silence ahead of the ig report. no softball interview is ever going to cover up distorted actions, the revealing political bias in her text with peter strzok. as sara carter put it, her actions, they damage to the fbi and the image of this country. here with more fox news investigative reporter sara carter, okay, i want you to comment on this. we just had this other

breaking news, which explains a lot. first of all, jerome was appointed, this is important for everybody to know, for the purpose of looking into the origins of the russian witch hunt. that is separate and apart from what horwitz's mandate was. so whatever that disagreement on that, does not matter that much to me. premeditated fraud on the fisa court, though, the evidence is incontrovertible at this point. >> absolutely, sean, people need to realize that durham has so much more leeway. he has a much wider scope than horwitz had. this is why he has been traveling overseas and traveled to italy to speak with intelligence officials as well as to london. he has a much wider scope. he is able to save enough more documents and able to subpoena people to come in to testify. and able to appeal to the grand jury. obviously john durham has found something so significant that it shifted from an administrative review to an actual terminal

probe. this is what is so important here. horwitz is going to have a devastating report. and this is the reason why, sean. people like lisa page, former fbi lawyer, kevin kleinsmith as well, as well as people like peter strzok, james comey, john brennan and others have come out of the woodwork now, because they are trying to change the narrative. what they are trying to do is control the narrative, because they know within a week, we, the public are going to see this report. and it is going to be extremely. >> sean: all right, sarah, thank you for that report. now we will have more on the upcoming fis fisa abuse released today, lindsey graham will join us exclusively. but first i have to issue a warning, once again lead the american people will be forced to endure another week of the democrats mind-numbing impeachment, well, you craning impeachment coup charade. more of the schiff show, and what is one of the worst relay

races ever that corrupt congenital liar schiff just pass the baton. the circus goes into judiciary chairman larry nadler's realm, if you will. squirming to get this across the finish line before christmas. it is a sight for sore eyes, total sham, blatant political stunt, case in point, the first official impeachment proceedings scheduled while the president is overseas. it won't even be in the country to defend himself. and a scathing beat down the white house counsel, pat cipollone you telling democrats, you scheduled this initial hearing no doubt purposely during the time that you know the president will be out of the country attending the nato leaders meeting in london. as you know, this baseless and highly partisan inquiry violates all past historical precedent, fact. basic due process rights, fact. fundamental fairness, fact. we understand from rumors and press reports, not from any notice provided in your letter or notice of the hearing that

the hearing will consist of an academic discussion of law professors. we understand this to mean that your initial hearing will include no fact witnesses at all. that is just like the schiff show. we have opinion people. we have hearsay people. we have one fact witness that said i don't want a quid pro quo, what do you want from ukraine? nothing at all. we will get random left-wing academics lecturing all of us in the values of hating trump impeachment. is this an actual proceeding or just a tap load morton downey, jerry springer tv talk show? here with the full report, capitol hill senior producer chad pergram is with us. okay, so we are going to have a talk show? i wonder if they will be throwing chairs, the academics that are offering their opinions on impeachment. i wonder if alan dershowitz will be invited, chad? >> impeachment it is getting real on capitol hill, just tonight the intelligence committee democrats completed their version of the impeachment

report. impeachment falls under the jurisdiction of the judiciary committee. this report could serve as a basis to write articles of impeachment. members can review the report now. but they will not publish the report until at this time tomorrow night. republicans are not buying the democratic report, republicans preemptively published a rebuttal today. republicans argue that novembers hearings produced no evidence of an impeachable offense. in democrats based their allegations on hearsay and speculation. the house intelligence chairman adam schiff shot back that the g.o.p. report was intended for an audience of one and ignores what he termed voluminous evidence of alleged misdeeds. the judiciary impeachment hearing is wednesday, the white house as they will not participate. but today i asked a senior administration source that officials may try to work out and in between or half measure. i was told, stay tuned. republicans want schiff to testify at the hearing, but instead the hearing futures for cobol professors. when democrats could actually

try to impeach the president, democrats just today announced the house will remain in session almost until christmas. trying to impeach president clinton on the saturday before christmas in 1998, but the democrats have the votes for impeachment red house speaker nancy pelosi is a master at reading her costco's. if nancy has a vote, she will move to impeach penn if she does not, impeachment could wait until the new year. a member of the leadership team told fox that the backlog of bills in the house works against a december impeachment vote and the democrat noted that the impeachment quote does not fit in the holiday spirit. back to you. >> sean: chad pergram, by the way, hitchhikers guide to everything in life, chad pergram. as the democrats impeachment coup now unfolds, the top republican on the house judiciary committee congressman doug collins, by the way, who should be appointed the position for the senate in the great state of georgia, no idea what the republican governor of

georgia is doing. i will get to it in a second paired but anyway, doug collins has turned into a rock star demanding that a central corrupt figure in the entire ordeal be corrupt, copper mines, cowardly congenital liar adam schiff be made to testify. one note about congressman collins, he would be the single best choice to fill that senate seat, vacated by the retiring senator, good guy, somebody that i have known for years but he had some health issues, johnny isakson. we wish him well. a leading conservative voice, doug collins in the house. single-handedly helped spearhead the g.o.p. impeachment coup resistance with great, great courage and conviction, unlike so many others. i don't know why the governor of georgia, who i consider my second home, brian kemp is attempting what appears to be an untested big republican romney donor, described by many as a rino. we have invited governor kemp on radio and tv to explain this decision. why appoint a huge romney

supporter, not a trump supporter? some group that the association is with has raised a lot of questions. declining multiple invitations paid he can't find 5 minutes either today or tomorrow. meanwhile back in the swamp, the judiciary committee chairman, jerry nadler has a stranglehold on the impeachment proceeding as he runs his talk show this week byron york in a deadly column in the "washington examiner" points out that this has alwaysa bad faith impeachment. many democrats wanted to impeach trump from the get-go. frustrated at their inability to get it done, they jumped on their last best hope of taking every shortcut to ensure their preferred result. racing to beat the political deadline imposed by the party's presidential contest. two key things now stand in the way of the democrats political hit job. one, democrats in swing districts. they are feeling the heat as public support for impeachment is seeing a massive decline. and two, this decline in support might have something to do with the fact that there is zero evidence of any wrongdoing.

there was no quid pro quo. like joe, and a zero experience millionaire son hunter, that has been echoed many times by the president of ukraine including a most recent interview again. this weekend with times magazi magazine. zelinski saying, look, i never talk to the president on a position of quid pro quo. i don't know why you're doing this. but the answer of president zelensky is there is corruption in this country like corruption you inherited. by the way, look at what 1998 was like. let's listen to congressman jerry nadler railing against impeachment, you might remember this. the same guy, 1998. >> does not earn the confidence of the american people in any action we take, especially if we seek to overturn the result of a free election viewed with great suspicion and could divide a nation for years to come. we do not need a decade of candidates running for office accusing each other of railroading a democratically

elected president out of office or participating in a thinly veiled coup d'etat. >> one of the regions that we all feel so angry about what they are doing, is that they are ripping from us, they are rippig us under our votes. they are telling us that our boats don't count. they must never have a narrowly voted impeachment or in impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. the american people have heard the allegations against a president, and they overwhelmingly oppose impeaching him. the elected president clinton, they still support him. we have no right to overturn the judgment of the american people. this partisan coup d'etat will go down in infamy in the history of this nation. >> sean: that was 1998 jerry nadler, 2019 jerry nadler is now chairing the committee to impeach a president on party lines based on no evidence. a lot more on the breaking news. this is huge, the battle between william barr and the inspector general on the origins of the russia witch hunt.

a senator lindsey graham joining a spread first joining us, florida congress woman matt gaetz, legal analyst gregg jarrett, author of the next red wave, the senator for a law director of the spokesperson, member of the trump legal team jordan secular. matt gaetz, i will start with you, you can go to any aspect of any of this. so we have a bunch of professors. i wonder if they will throw chairs like it is a jerry springer show. because anything they say is meaningless to any child that would take place in the senate. >> democrats having seen poll numbers for impeachment decrease over the past two weeks now believe what will save their case is a parade of law professors to lecture the american people that it is really not what the american people want to that matters like reforming the asylum laws, or lowering prescription drug prices. we should be incensed by what has captivated adam schiff and the radical left. but i store a member, sean, when the radical left told us that if we elected on donald trump it

would strengthen our enemies and weaken our alliances. you have isis with their caliphate crumbled, and you have president trump going to london to a nato that is at its strongest point possibly in history because president trump went outside the box and got our friends to pay their fair share. it is the same out-of-the-box thinking and approach that he is getting impeach now. and it is a total sham. spin on the inspector general, the original mandate was fisa abuse. he comes to different regulations on the russia witch hunt, no power to put forth indictments and prosecute criminal cases, but durham does. and he is getting into all of that, but that was his mandate, was it not? >> that is, and i'm sure that william barr's opinion is infory john durham's investigation and the results so far. as i argued in both of my books. you have to have two things to launch an investigation by the fbi of in this case donald trump.

you have to have a reasonable basis to believe that a crime is committed. and second of all, you have to have specific articulable facts of that crime. the fbi had none of those things. they had just a couple of things. they had papadopoulos hearing a rumor that russians had hillary clinton's emails. it is not a crime to hear a rumor. second, they have a dossier that was completely unverified. they even went to christopher steele who wrote it and offered him $50,000 to cooperate any of it, he could not. this investigation, bar is correct, should never have been launched in july of 2016, and nine months later, comey admitted in his testimony that they still had no evidence, so the special counsel should not of been appointed. >> sean: jordan, your take on it legally? >> legally here, it is attorney general barr, not the inspector general who directs the department of justice

through the u.s. attorney to bring criminal charges. the inspector general issues a report about wrongdoing. so that is .1. if the attorney general has a disagreement, guess who will won out the day? he can issue a note in the report that he disagrees with us. and instruct his u.s. attorney is like durham to move along with prosecutions that they see fit or grand juries that they see fit. but sean, one thing i want to note tonight on wednesday when we hear from the four law professors prayed i was waiting all day, when when jerry nadler released the list, because i had suspicions about who would be on here. noah feldman, he was one of the first people, he is a professor of harvard law to say that ukraine, the call was a crime. you have pamela carlin, she was 1 of 42 legal scholars who signed a letter before trump took office attacking president trump, michael gerhardt on record advocating for impeachment. in only one witness, jonathan hurley. saying no to impeachment. >> sean: by the way, matt gaetz, i heard that you are

an interloper, but apparently the government -- apparently, that's what they are saying in georgia. we will talk tomorrow. lindsey graham ways and next on our big breaking news, and the no malarkey tour, disaster for joe. have you started your free trial on fox nation, the time to join us right now, just go to foxnation.com, the perfect companion to the fox news channel featuring your favorite fox news personality like you have never seen them before. exclusive series, specials, documentaries that entertain and inform. go now, foxnation.com, and you get to watch these exclusive shows. take a look.

>> sean: all right, breaking just moments ago from "the washington post," the attorney general of the united states bill barr has expressed disagreement with the ig's findings surrounding the origins of the russia probe. that was not his original mandate. that is the mandate of john durham. now if true, it looks like, well, this explains a lot. doesn't it? here for reaction, the huge development senator lindsey graham. we expect, all right, you broke it here on the show one week from today we will get the ig report on fisa abuse. durham was appointed as i understood for the origins of the russia probe. but also that is now officially a criminal investigation expanding also into fisa abuse and other issues. the inspector general is now power to convene a grand jury, has no power, for example, he pointed out mccabe and comey lacked candor, so nothing happened as a result of that.

but is it not incontrovertible that there were multiple warnings to the fbi and doj not to use the clinton bought and paid for the russian dossier, that it was unverifiable, and that there was a bias of christopher steele, and a memo called the grass graham memo, says the bulk of information foe unverified dossier. isn't that an established fact in the case? >> i believe it to be so, but horwitz, we will see what he says. but the first thing i want to say is be wary of "the washington post" and "the new york times" reporting on what is coming up with horwitz. they have been trying over time to spin this thing to diminish the effect, to downplay it. i can tell you without any hesitation, attorney general barr has every confidence in the world in mr. horwitz. he believes that he has done a good job. a professional job, and he appreciates the work and the efo

disclosing abuse at the department of abuse. in december 2017, mccabe testified in the house, according to the house and tell memo that without the steele dossier, there will be no warrant issued. so what i will ask mr. horwitz, do you agree with that? without the dossier, there would be no warrant, where they were liable to the state, did they know that steele had a bias? did they ignore it? when did they get the warrant, before or after? and here's what we will find that they pulled a fast one on the fisa court, misled and defrauded the fisa court. i think that's what you will find. >> sean: okay, so you will have him in your committee one week from wednesday. we get the report a week from tonight. i want to be very clear. i think some of this would explain that the delayed aspects of all of this, one. but i've been told clearly that the facts are devastating. as he lays out the fact.

he may not make the conclusion, but that would not be as per view anyway. >> number one i have every confidence that he will be fair to everybody. the people investigated, the public, the trump campaign and all of us. but here is the point, no warrant without the dossier, the question for me and everybody else is how reliable is the dossier? did they know that it was unreliable? when did they first tried to verify it? before the warrant or after the warrant? where they warned that christopher steele was out to get trump? did they ignore those warnings? of all of that proved to be true, it is devastating. every american should be concerned. and the fisa court to do something about it. and if they accept this as okay behavior, that maybe we should get rid of the fisa court. >> sean: okay, agreed. by the way, i would hate to see that actually. because there is a lot of evil in the world, and you know what, there is evil -- i don't care if it is a broad or domestic, we have enemies to domestic and foreign. we need to get to the bottom of

this. my major concern in all of this is horwitz already referred, you know, from further investigation, mccabe and comey for lying. didn't michael cohen, paul manafort recently roger stone run into issues involving lack of candor that led to guilty admissions, convictions? >> yes, so he referred people for prosecution, comey, they decided not to prosecute based on what the clinton email investigation. i trust william barr to be fair too. i don't know what is in the report, but here's what i believe. if there wa was a counterintelligence investigation of the trump campaign, there was credible evidence to open the investigation, why did they not tell trump? when dianne feinstein had somebody in their office they believed to work for communist china, they told diane, and she fired the person cared if they are investigating a campaign ann

about the foreign influence, than that truly is fine. >> sean: here is what i have been told before the show, and this is what i was told numerous times, that the facts that the ig will put before the american people will shock the conscience. they will be devastating too many people. but it will be up to the bar and durham. it will be up to the attorney general -- >> 100%. >> the attorney general and durham and his report. an criminal investigation to hold them accountable, which by the way, no inspector general has the ability to convene a grand jury, make charges and prosecute, do they? >> exactly, he is not a prosecutor. he is looking to find out if the system got off the rails. how to protect or change it in the future, how to make sure it never happens again. the best way to make sure that the fisa court is not defrauded in the future is to hold those people accountable who actually did this. >> sean: last question, is it

then fair to say that there will be a map that will be laid out by horwitz for the attorney general, four durham, and they will also -- by the way, we are told that their investigation is far more advanced than anybody knew it this point. >> that is a good way to look at it. you should look at this investigation a sort of a road map of where you might go criminally. >> sean: whatever differences there are, i guess the person that decides will be the attorney general. will be mr. durham mr. mark >> if they are investigating my campaign and they think that sog on my campaign is influenced by a foreign government, and they l me, and they keep spying on my campaign, i would be really pissed. every politician in america should be worried about this. if, in fact, they open up a counterintelligence investigation of the trump campaign and they never told him about it, than that truly is spying. and every politician in america should be worried.

>> sean: last point, counterintelligence investigation has to start with the president. that president would have been obama. this is just the beginning. >> this is just the beginning. >> sean: the mystery begins to unfold finally. monday, i hope it is not delayed again. a senator, thank you. we appreciate your time for it also tonight, hunter biden fighting to keep his finances secret. fox news' chief correspondent trace trace gallagher of life in the newsroom in new york tonigh. look at this with the very latest. bicoastal. >> new york where it is snowing. not clear what is exactly and hunter biden's financial documents. his attorneys are arguing that the information will be used by us, the media, to cause him "undue prejudice, and ointments, embarrassment, or oppression." a laundry list of opportunities, and his attorneys argued that none of the documents have anything to do with biden's ongoing lawsuit. the mother of the child is demanding $11,000 in legal fees as well as child support, but in

court documents, hunter biden who lives in california is indicating that he has taken on significant debt since he divorced his wife back in 2017. biden also reportedly says that he has no monthly income since may of this year. experts say the documents could give us more insight into exactly what happened to the money he received as a board member for the ukrainian gas company burisma. finally, we should note that moments before the hearing on the case today, three lawyers representing hunter biden withdrew from the case. citing "irreconcilable conflict." >> sean: trace gallagher, thank you. today 337 days until you, we, the people, we get to make the final decision. the selection. and by the way, look at biden's biggest opponents. well, continues to be himself. he and his campaign has gone from bloopers to blunders, and weirdness to just downright bizarre. during an appearance with his

wife, the "no malarkey tour" in iowa over the weekend, biden had, well, i guess the only way to describe it is a biting moment, literally. take a look. >> and when they cut to the president of the united state united states -- [laughter] >> sean: did he just biked her? i guess so. but it gets more bazaar, a resurface clip from june 2017. look at this. there is no biden in his speech talking about his time as a lifeguard and his hairy -- well, blonde bleached legs. ask yourself as you watch this, does this scare you if he becomes president? >> and by the way, you know, i sit on the stand, and get hot, i have hairy legs that turned -- that turned blonde in the sun. and the kids used to come up and

reach in the pool and rub my leg down so that it was straight and then watch the hair come back up again. they would look at it. so i word only mack learned about and kids jumping on my lap, and i would love kids to my lap. >> sean: what the hell did he just say there? okay, i never do this on the show, can you rewrap that? i want to play it again. see if you can ascertain what he is actually saying and what that means based on everything else we know like joe, 330, which meant nothing. take a look again. >> and by the way, you know, i sit on the stand, and get hot. i have hairy legs. that turned, that turned blonde in the sun. and the kid used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down, so that it was straight, and then watch the hair come back up again. they would look at it.

so i learned about roaches. i learned about kids jumping on my lap, and i love kids jumping on my lap. >> sean: wow, okay. if you can interpret that, you are a far better person than i am. this is the democratic so-called front runner. this is the man democrats think and beat trump. is this demand that you want to be your president? just when you think is think biden cannot get any worse, can't put his campaign and then the more damage control, biden finds a way to sink even lower. he lost the fastball. he never had one, i don't think he has an underhand pitch at this point, because effect is to does not have much to run on. and by the way, it has gotten so bad that he is flat out making things up like falsely claiming that he spent time with north korea's kim jong un. the only problem is, he did it. take a look. >> you're going to have to assume that position the moment they are like sworn in on january 20th, and know that the rest of the world knows that

person, in this case me, and that i know then. putin has no illusions about whether i know him or not. kim jong un has no person that knows if i know him or not. of the same with the president of china, xi jinping, i spent a lot of time with these folks. they know. they know. and they know i know. >> sean: and they know, and they know that i know. but the mullahs in iran, you gave them $150 billion, that was dumb. yeah, and you gave vladimir more flexibility. let's release those transcripts. think about it. we also have biden on tape admitting that you are not getting the billion dollars if you of course fire the prosecutor that i know your prosecutors investigating my zero experienced son is being paid millions. son of a bee, they did it, making gaffe after gaffe, his quaid and his pro and his quota with joe. and you have the obama-biden

record, 13 more americans on food stamps, 18 million more in poverty. at the lowest participation rate since he '70s, the worst recovery since he 'porters, and to the lowest homeownership rate in 50 years. he is trapped, he is tired, he is in big trouble, and voters apparently are turning out sleepy creepy crazy uncle joe 330. political reporter detailed a remarkable exchange at an iowa diner where a farmer was sitting next to biden and had no idea who he was. as a reporter tweeted "well, i asked the guy if you just was not a fan of the bidens, and he said, who? the man never heard of joe biden. i guess that's why joe biden is on a last ditch desperation bus tour, then no malarkey expressed in the hawkeye state. and 337 days, thank god, we, the people, you, the american people get to shock the world again. it's all in your hands. when we come back, if you think

being called deplorable, smelly walmart shopper, clinging to god above or bibles or second amendment rights and religion makes us bad, wait till you hear what trump supporters will do and neck were called this time. dan bongino, ari fleischer react to that straight ahead. ♪ where we all want more energy. but with less carbon footprint. can we have both? at bp, we're working every day to make energy that's cleaner and better. and we see possibilities everywhere. hi honey, we got in early. cleaner and better. yeah, and we brought steve and mark. ♪ experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list sales event. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down, zero due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment.

can a banana peel fuel your flight. bp and fulcrum bioenergy think so. together we'll reduce emissions and landfill waste by turning garbage into jet fuel. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. bitreat them all as if, they are hot and energized. stay away from any downed wire, call 911 and call pg&e right after so we can both respond out and keep the public safe.

's beyond the psychotic hate to rub me the mob is not taking a break from the 24/7, their rage psychosis on sunday. yes, ms dnc conspiracy theory channel, area 51 rachel maddow friend joy greek had some really nasty things to say about trump supporter's. joy, this is not very nice. take a look. >> it is not just the majority that say it is a call. there is a lot of evidence that it is a racial and religious

cult of personality where his base is solidly among the white evangelicals. that almost worship him and say that he is the chosen one of god. >> sean: pretty unbelievable, also the first lady melania trump's annual christmas decorations, yeah, once again barking out rage and anger from the mob. one daily beast reporter saying melania trump's joyless christmas decorations will haunt your nightmares. here with reaction, fox news contributor's ari fleischer, dan bongino. great to see you both. ari, if melania reads books to young children, she gets attacked. melania trump puts up christmas decorations, she gets attacked. it is never ending. i don't remember that happening to michelle. except when she said for the first time in my adult life i am proud of my country. >> yeah, well, this is what i find so distressing about the asked back atmosphere today.

and the one thing that i see is politics is fair-minded, and to give my critics of people who oppose my thoughts the benefit of the doubt that they are good people with good motives. but once you start talking about people who disagree and you being in colts, this is what is so divisive and harmful to america. i don't view the people that oppose donald trump as evil. that is their point of view. they are entitled to do that. they should give the same respect to people who support the president and particularly his wife. it is out-of-bounds to have these criticisms against her. where all of the women's magazines that used to have first lady is on the cover? they don't grace the covers of milani, do they? >> sean: dan bongino, i am a christian, i always think christians are kind of attacked, and that's why i kind of like kanye's new album and his bravery, because he wants to be a better person. okay, i want to help, i need help. that's how i view christianity. everybody thinks for some reason that christians are perfect, they are not. nobody is.

and what is amazing about, everybody has that, if you are a christian, you do believe. this is not about race. we are all children of god created by the same father. you believe in his son, jesus. the integrated church, more predominantly depending on area demographics. it might have more of one race than another, but the same brotherhood of belief, isn't it? >> absolutely, amen to that, sean. i am with you on that. i am a sinner, and i feel like i was saved a long time ago. i am as far from perfect as any human being on this planet. and you would think, i must say, ari is one of the nicest guys i've met at fox along with you, sean, much nicer than me. i just don't, he really is, but i just don't see the left that way. i appreciated that he tries to find the good in people, but maybe it is the skeptic in me, i have had that beaten out of me, running for office a couple of times myself, and watch what the

left in the media does to people. i'm not saying that there aren't good people out there on the left, there are. that would be ridiculous to say as much, but the percentage of people left amongst the left is inconsistently small. who attacks christmas. like christmas decorations? you realize what kind of lunatic you have to be to find something wrong with christmas decorations? that is like finding something wrong with the big mac or something. what is wrong with these people? >> sean: ari, do you want to respond to that? >> there is nothing wrong with a big mac. [laughter] >> sean: i love big macs. to stop attacking, i prefer the quarter pounder with cheese though. [laughter] >> i am all for going after your opponents of politics. that is part of the american tradition. that's how democracy gets stronger and we should right about ideas and personalities, and we have always been a noisy democracy. people say nasty things about each other, but somehow in

america we have always kept it within the bounds. we always kept it within the hard lines. >> sean: i disagree, ari, i don't ever think that they were fair to george bush. i thought they were vicious to bush. >> well, they were vicious to bush, and face it, sean, a lot of conservatives are vicious into obama, and people are vicious to trump. we have been in a bad cycle the last ten or 15 years. >> sean: thank you both. new evidence, the unearthed tonight on the bbc, raising more doubts against prince andrew and his friendship with jeffrey epstein, lolita express. this report is shocking next. ♪ ♪ turn around ♪ look at me ♪ there is someone ♪ look at me

♪ >> sean: a lot more questions to answer tonight after the bbc

aired its explosive interview with one of jeffrey epstein's accusers. trace gallagher has the very latest on this unfolding saga. he was caught in his interview five, six, seven lies, specific lies? this is the first, formerly known as virginia roberts. she told the bbc when she was 17 she was traffic by jeffrey epstein and forced to have sex with prince andrew and this is what she said. >> i'm calling b.s. on this because that is what it is. he knows what happened. >> she also claims she went dancing with prudence andrew, watch. >> i was sweating, sweat was raining everywhere. put a stop on that but i knew i had to keep him happy because of jeffrey epstein. >> he had a gland problem. maxwell, epstein's girlfriend

and reports in allegations with the prince having sex with virginia, she sent an email and said she had information. >> laura: we will never be the media mob, let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham. >> laura: hannity did you have a good thanksgiving? >> sean: i fried my turkey. why does everybody think that everybody wants to see the pictures of every aspect of your life? >> laura: i know, your stuff is mostly about politics and humor which i like. >> sean: they don't really give a rip, me and my dog. here is me doing this. [laughter] >> laura: occasionally i've done a dog but very rarely. hannity, people now put on twitter and i'm sure i've offended this rule that belongs on instagram. instagram and facebook are not twitter. and i have to listen to that, kind of unspoken rule and perhaps --