december 5, and they're going to continue next week and tomorrow right here so we will see you at 7:00, tucker carlson coming up next in washington, d.c. if have a great night, everybod everybody. >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." the president is going to be impeached, that's the word we have heard from the house speaker nancy pelosi who effectively confirmed it during a short dress this morning. on the one hand, the news is no surprise at all, approximately 100% of msnbc viewers have been demanding impeachment since well before donald trump was elected president. they would be baffled and enraged of democrats pulled that now. these people who believe trump not only works directly for arch villain vladimir putin but also once had an extramarital affair, something that party of polyamory claims to oppose.

from staging and open rebellion, she has no choice but to continue with impeachment. and yet, there is a problem with that. as much as jeff zucker supports impeachment, normal people find the whole thing bizarre. even voters who don't like donald trump and didn't vote for him last time don't think he ought to be removed by congress. for starters, they don't understand what the crime is, something about ukraine and hunter biden. sounds kind of shady but is it worse than the opioid epidemic? more pressing that health care costs which are rising faster than wages? fill in the blanks for the issues that congress could be handling if it weren't for impeachment. now impeachment doesn't really right on that list. isn't that election 11 months away? why can't we wait until then to switch president is, isn't that how democracy works? those are some of the questions that pelosi and her party will have to answer at some point, probably not too far from now.

impeachment will almost certainly turn out to be a political disaster for them. donald trump would benefit. pelosi seems to know this. she didn't get to be speaker because she is bad politics but but you can't acknowledge it out loud, so like the british army during their retreat, she puts a brave face on a doomed mission and fights on. he was her explanation this morning. >> we begin where our founders began were in the course of events, it becomes necessary for people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another. with those words, our founders courageously began our declaration of independence from an oppressive monarch for among other grievances refusal to follow rightfully passed laws. in the course of today's events, it becomes necessary for us to address among other grievances

the president's failure to faithfully execute the law. >> tucker: it is just mesmerizing on many levels. what did it mean, exactly? it was a metaphor. trump is a slightly more orange version of king george the third. democrats of the patriots plotting to overthrow him with violence. that strikes you as alarming, pelosi has a few words of comfort. a group of 18th century slaveholders she assures us would have been completely in favor of what she's doing. >> james madison, the architect of the constitution warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the republic. another founder fear that a president may be bribed by a greater interest to betray his trust. he emphasized that this magistrate is not the king. the people are the king.

>> tucker: so james madison has given nancy pelosi's personal seal of approval. remember that the next time pelosi's acolytes tried to pull addison statue off his pedestal for crimes against progressive orthodoxy. they are being presented as heroes. enjoy it while it lasts. the framers were read that corrupt americans might take money from foreign powers to do their bidding and that is why we need to be impeached donald trump, get it? wait a second, trump didn't take money from ukraine. hunter biden data. trump just pointed that out. he was on james madison's side, vigilantly policing bribery by hostile foreign power and for that he must be removed from office. that is the democratic party's position and if you are not sold yet, if you sense there might be a few links missing from that logic chain, nancy pelosi has an answer for you, not so much an argument as it is a cliche bomb. designed to convey the

impression that important facts are being delivered and profound thinking is taking place. is like that old don mclean song. it doesn't actually mean anything but it moves you anyway. less in the nancy pelosi's rendition of it. >> the republic, if we could keep it, said benjamin franklin, our democracy is what is at stake. the president leaves us no choice but to act because he is trying to corrupt once again the election for his own benefit. the president has engaged in abuse of power undermining our national security and jeopardizing the integrity of our elections. >> tucker: maybe we are being too literal here, but what is she telling us? pelosi is telling us that in order to honor the spirit of benjamin franklin, we must suspend our democracy in order to preserve it. there was a time when america, the left was sharp and clear right enough to see the irony in a line like that. we have to torch the village to

save it, sure we do, make sense. liberals in 1975 would've laughed pelosi off the stage. democracy means deciding things in elections it was obvious then but somewhere along the line, the left lost interest in democracy and gave up on it completely. by the time obama arrived, they were bragging about how they graduated beyond winning over voters with conventional arguments and promises. going forward, shifting demographics was going to win elections for them now and forever. they gloated about that in public, wrote triumphant books about it. donald trump prove them wrong, leapt off the front page and beat them in a presidential election. the shock was so profound that he never recovered. the left turned against the country that disappointed them in the system that made it possible, open the border, there were off the restraints, and erase the past, whatever it takes to regain power, we are for. that can never happen again, it was too painful. that's what they resolved.

like a reform to drum, the democratic party got religion. nancy pelosi started talking a lot about prayer. >> today, i am asking our chairman to receive the articles of impeachment. i commend our committee chairs with her somber approach for which the president had not made necessary. in signing the declaration of independence, our founders invoked a firm reliance on divine providence. democrats too are prayerful. >> tucker: is anyone else enjoying this? adam schiff's somber reproach? that's what nancy pelosi would like you to recall for the past couple of weeks and appreciate the dignity that bug eyed lunatic from burbank brought to this process. you watch the proceedings, it was like being in the room as alexander hamilton compose "the federalist" papers, a tribute government. >> i would just say to people

watching here at home and around the world and the words of my great colleague, we are better than that. adjourned. >> tucker: a tsunami of falseness that threatens to drown us all, save that tape. when donald trump gets reelected, we will have tangible evidence showing exactly how it happen. the other somber and serious person's house judiciary chairman jerry nadler who actually fell asleep yesterday during the hearing he was supposedly overseeing, watch this. >> there is no doubt it will be an unfair and partisan effort. this on the american people deserve better. democrats on this committee don't like this president, they don't like his policies, they don't like him as a person, they don't like the fact that the investigation was a flop so now you're going to impeach him.

>> tucker: hard to judge that many people felt that way, she hosts just as with janine we are always grateful to have her on the show. so is it just wishful thinking or is it true when it seems like to me that this has the capacity to boomerang and really hurt the people staging the show? >> of course, everyone is assuming it's going to boomerang and hurt them but the proof is in the fact that they have this rush to judgment, the democrats now. why are they rushing? why are they not waiting for the material witness is that they might be able to bring on to give more insight and more facts because if you will remember the so-called evidence that they showed us, none of those witnesses and the intelligence committee had any evidence about a quid pro quo, none of the professors knew any of the facts, so what we have are just a bunch of people who hate donald trump and yet the people

who have some information about this like john bolton, like mick mulvaney, they don't even want to wait for them. of why? they are losing their impetus now. the american public and starting to get tired of this. makes no sense. there is no smoking gun. so now nancy pelosi is like let's get this done, let's get this done right away. i hope they get it done right away and i hope they start a trial in the senate and they put on nancy pelosi and adam schiff and joe biden and hunter biden and all of the players. you want to show, let's put on a show but here's the problem. is my wheelhouse a little bit. the bottom line is there is no evidence. you have a bunch of trump hating people with this female professor going after barron trump and people couldn't pass an english course who say that when the president says

u.s. a favor because our country has been through a lot, he is really saying doing the king a favor. >> tucker: i almost feel guilty highlighting the steps, a lot of the cable networks are abetting this ridiculous sideshow. but i did say one thing today i wanted to ask you about my one of the nuggets that i think is significant is the fact that adam schiff's committee somehow wound up with the phone records of the president's lawyer. so the congressman from today suggested the republican's subpoena adam schiff's phone records. what do you think of that? >> i think it's only fair. i think it is constitutional. i think it's what our framers intended, it is everything that they wanted. this is a game of words, this is how everyone invokes prayer, the constitution, into taking in god

we trust out of every courtroom in this country, take prayer out of the classroom but now we have to say a prayer for all of this baloney. it is hogwash. none of this has any substance to it. and the fact that they now want to dust off the mueller report because they know ukraine has no evidence, no substance to it, this is pathetic. and who just said the other day my concern is if we don't impeach him he will get reelected. this is a sad commentary where they're taking away the american public's ability to vote for president, and the federalists, alexander hamilton describes impeachment as a crisis, as a release valve from a crisis of a national revolution. we are not in a national revolution, they just with their leg. >> tucker: don't want to be, that's for sure. a judge, thank you. judge jeanine has an exclusive interview with the vice president and airs this better day.

democrats seem determined to hurry through impeachment, finishing before christmas. why the rush? is there some good reason? former chief of staff and campaign manager for senate majority leader mitch mcconnell. thank you so much for coming on. you wouldn't mind, sketch out for us where this goes from here, what is likely to happen? maybe that's the most confusing part of this, where does this end up? >> i can understand why it's confusing, the underlying facts here they are trying to impeach for holding a that was ultimately delivered in exchange for a favor for some kind of investigation. >> tucker: eight we shouldn't be sending in the first place. >> be that as it may, it never happen so now we conduct all of these hearings and however you thought the intelligence committee proceeding went, yesterday was an abject disaster for democrats. they had three of the most

unpersuasive liberal professors i think you could probably ever come up with, try to make the case for impeaching president trump. there is no way the politics work for that. in case you are doubting your allegiances at any point when he took a look at those folks and said holy smokes, i can't believe this, i think what nancy pelosi did today and an announcement was try to hurry this along. the politics are not working for her, has to move it quickly and my suspicion is they probably try to do it before christmas. >> tucker: since you have worked up there for so long, is there anyone on pelosi staff who looked at the tape and said that really worked. i think we are back on track now, we are convincing people. seriously. >> because the sycophants within their own congressional world believe everything, but the flow intellectualism, regionalism, it is not fun to talk about, original construct of the constitution and "the federalist" papers, it was

all just so absurd, it certainly doesn't work for them which i think you were right in your monologue, speaker pelosi understands which is why she's trying to move this very quickly. >> tucker: that's why it looks like a hostage video. i think she is smarter than that. may be giving her too much credit. great to see you, thank you for that. during a press conference today, simply reporter james rosen asked pelosi whether she had any ill will towards the president and here's what happened next. >> i don't hate anybody. i grew up in a catholic house, and don't hate anybody. as a catholic, i resent you using the word hate in a sentence that addresses me. i don't hate anyone. i was raised in a way that is a heart full of love and always prayed for the president and i still pray for the president. i pray for the president all the time. so don't mess with me when it comes to words like that.

>> tucker: don't mess with me when it comes to holiness. just because i accused him of working for vladimir putin doesn't mean i hate him. i'm a catholic. what is this? colonist mark steyn joins us to explain what we just saw. i am not quite sure what to make of that, but i know when i shake my finger in your face and add emphasis, they make sense. >> she is praying for the president, tucker. we all know that. i know that observing the ritual niceties of american politics requires stomach being a boat load of industrial strength, but you and i have 300 million people across the country know that nancy pelosi isn't praying for the president, but as judge jeanine was saying, this all goes to the pious foe regionalism that when you're going to impeach a guy, you

stand up there, ben franklin, james madison, federalist paper, madison paper, the moment i wake up before i put on my botox, i say a little prayer for you. that is nancy pelosi's strategy for pretending that a three year effort to subvert the event and not accept 2016 election is finally coming to a meaningful impeachment. barack obama said election is a consequences. he crowed and bloated about tha that. the democrats are in this situation because they refuse to accept that elections have consequences. they claim for two years that trump was colluding with russia. now they claim he was colluding with ukraine. russia a couple of years back justin invaded ukraine so the enemy of the enemy of the enemy is all trump's friends, does it

make any difference and that is the situation the democrats have brought themselves into. you compared it with the retreat by british army in afghanistan, you compare it to the charge of the light brigade into the valley of death. into the valley of the skiff, into the valley of adam schiff's skiff, the entire democrat party has run and that is not going to work out for them. >> tucker: i prefer the obama approach where you say we won the election on we do what we want. i prefer that strongly to the false piety and the christian left i pray for you as i try to destroy you routine. why the self-righteousness? that makes it unbearable. >> i think that is a conscious strategy. jerry nadler had a natural reaction to this when you showed him falling comatose and dropping out of the bottom of the skiff, and this faux prayer

fullness, this fake religious is one of the reasons why you know this whole thing is a scam. she is coming on like tammy faye baker leading impeachment. >> tucker: i prefer tammy faye baker. i do too. tammy faye for speaker of the house. >> tucker: she has passed away sadly. mark steyn, thank you. so a voter question joe biden's fitness for the presidency at an event, responded by calling the voter fat. literally. amazing. testing the end of his patients. we will show you that plus another testy exchange with pete buttigieg next. when you move homes, you move more than just yourself.

that's why xfinity has made taking your internet and tv with you a breeze. really? yup. you can transfer your service online in about a minute. you can do that? yeah. and with two-hour service appointment windows, it's all on your schedule. awesome. so while moving may still come with its share of headaches... no kidding. we're doing all we can to make moving simple, easy, awesome. go to xfinity.com/moving to get started.

>> tucker: the first democratic primaries or two months from now and the shrinking number of democratic candidates are fighting hard for every vote. today, joe biden who was at one point the vice president erupted at a man who asked him about his son's former job being night in ukraine in its own as president. >> the reason i'm running is because i've been around a long time and i know more than most people and i can get things done, and you want to check my shape on it, let's do push-ups, let's run, do whatever you want to do. no one has said my son has done

anything wrong and i did not on any occasion is no one ever said that. you said i set up my son to work in an oil company. isn't that what you said? get your words straight, jack. here's the deal. >> you don't have any more backbone then trump does. >> tucker: what was that? wanted biden to call him? let's play that again. >> look, here's the deal. >> tucker: look, fat, here's the deal. senior fellow lisa boothe has been watching and joins us tonight. i don't think i've ever seen a presidential candidate turned to a voter and say look, fat, here's the deal. may for or against that? >> let the audience be the

judge. i have worked on multiple campaigns and i can tell you with absolute certainty it is not a good strategy to fetching potential voters. 1 megabyte and at one point also accused like guy of being sedentary. the guy says high watch tv and he said of course. >> challenges him to a push-up contest, an iq test, a series of challenges which we have seen him challenge president trump which i have not seen a video of him actually doing push-ups so i challenged him because i don't think it can actually do them, he is just throwing this around so when is not telling little kids about corn pop, he is out on the campaign trail challenging potential voters of push-up contest on an actual substantive level about this, this is how he responds when he is challenged or when he is asked about his son hunter biden. so how was he going to do when a debate stage with president trump when he is actually challenged with burisma and his son because we know that

obama's own state department has concerns. they asked about hunter biden, we know george can't brought those concerns. john kerry who was secretary of state at the time, his own stepson to raise concerns about burisma, the state department official. how was he going to do and he is actually pressed on this issue. >> tucker: we don't even know what he was paid at this point. >> these are all questions he hasn't been asked by the mainstream media but he is not the only person he was challenged on the campaign trail as well, there was an event recently in south bend and it was an event, african-american supporters of pete buttigieg, and look what happened. >> why are you talking about pete buttigieg?

this is a farce. >> pete buttigieg. >> tucker: what was that? >> those were black lives matter is protesters who were at an event for african-americans for pete buttigieg, the campaign is distancing themselves from the event despite the fact that sent out a press release mentioning the event, numerous staffers at the event including pete buttigieg own campaign manager but nonetheless, comes on the heels of getting a lot of heat from african-american voters which is a challenge because if you look at a state like south carolina where he was this past week, he is at 0% with the black voters there who make up over 60% of the primary electorate in the state to this is actually a real challenge pete buttigieg is facing. he is doing well in iowa and new hampshire where you have white liberal voters but has challenges in nevada as well as south carolina. >> tucker: that was one of the weirdest tapes i've seen in a long time. the white guy was the black lives matter protester, correct? >> that is correct. >> tucker: bizarre.

>> a lot of things have been bizarre, corn pop, challenging people to push-up contest. >> tucker: great to see you, thank you. of americans experiment is the longest and most successful of its kind in world history. one component of that success is the electoral college which by its nature discourages nationalism, prevents a few large states from dominating the country. is working very well, exactly as intended for close to 240 years but since it kept democrats out of power in 2016, the party wants it on immediately. senator elizabeth warren is leading the push for that, watch. watch. >> what are your thoughts on the electoral college? >> i want to get rid of it. so here is my goal. in my goal is to get elected and then to be the last american president elected by the electoral college.

i want the second term to be that i got elected by direct vote, i am ready. a popular vote. >> tucker: john daniel davison took this seriously, a fantastic piece very recently. and so you a lot for coming on. unlike most people, i sympathize with my democrats are frustrated, just denied them, one the most votes but didn't get the presidency so that's why they are mad. why you would basically undo the entire country. a sum that up for us if you would. >> the electoral college is inextricably bound up with the idea of federalism which is the linchpin of the constitutional system. we have the federal government, we have the state, and both have sovereignty. it's why every state gets two senators. and it is why we use the electoral college to elect presidents. the section of the constitution that describes the electoral college is the longest section

of the constitution. they spent a lot of time thinking about how to elect a president who would be truly a national president and as you say, would avoid sectionalism. we went to a direct popular vote, new york and california would choose the president. >> tucker: that would be bad because huge parts of the country would be completely not represented at all. >> that is right. the democrats have the same complaints about the senate. they don't like this, small states with low populations get two senators. they don't think that's fair. they want a direct democracy, they don't want a republic. i think because they don't quite understand what a republic is sometimes what they are describing is the majority which is what james madden warned us again. >> tucker: would you keep a senate without electoral college? >> no. there would be no point for a lot of things if we got rid of the electoral college, if we do away with federalism.

let's just have them be administrated units of the federal government. >> tucker: which as you are a group they would be. it's a great piece and i hope reviewers will pull it up on the internet and read it. great to see you, thank you. bill de blasio is off the campaign trail back in new york city trying to clean up the streets by off-loading new york city's homeless onto its neighbors. and we will speak to one of those neighbors after the break. , you can cook foods that are crispy on the outside and juicy on the inside. the ninja foodi pressure cooker, the pressure cooker that crisps.

>> a fox news alert from america news headquarters. more people are dead involving a stolen ups truck in southern florida. was carjacked by at least two robbery suspects. they led police on a two can a chase that began in coral gables and ended with a shoot out in a busy intersection. police say the ups driver, two robbers and another motorist were killed but all police officers are said to be safe. a black hawk helicopter carrying three crewmembers crashing in central minnesota, all three on board were killed. minnesota national guard says it lost contact with the helicopter shortly after takeoff from st. cloud. was on a maintenance test flight. governor tim walz who served with a national guard for 24 years is now heading to the crash site. we will bring you updates on

that story as it comes in. when news breaks out, we will break it. i am trace gallagher in new york. now back to "tucker carlson tonight" ." >> tucker: now that his vanity presidential campaign is over, new york mayor bill de blasio is back at work. he worked two hours and 20 minutes a day during his campaign. and he's returned to his city full time and what is he doing with the extra hours? one man who knows is host of the morning show and one of our favorite guests, great to see you. so what is the mayor doing now that he is back? >> he goes to the gym every morning. i always track it. he said tell tucker hi. i don't like to say anything bad about anybody but he goes to the gym and he has kind of a leisurely -- i want this job. >> tucker: he is smoking a ton of weed.

i don't want to make that accusation here on your show, i hear some things, i heard thing things. >> tucker: stoned or not a shipping of the homeless into your state of new jersey. >> people are moving out in droves in the state of new jersey, by the thousands every single month. the property taxes are crushing us. we can't keep them home. now they are sending people into the state for a free and paying them to move in there and the poor people of the streets of new york going what exit is that? they don't know where they're going. >> tucker: so homeowners are leaving new jersey and fleeing to florida and texas but new york is making up the difference by shipping their homeless in. is at a pretty good deal for you or no? >> no, because everyone gets everything for free. was of us who want to stay around the community, it's great

to have you here in new york. thanks for noticing my tuxedo. >> tucker: we ran into each other backstage, i was so impressed. >> that was my favorite moment of the day. going to do a show. and you've got a charity, i've got a tuxedo. so in jersey, we love it, we stay where we are, my mother was still there god bless her some i like to hang around in the community. i raise my children there. is getting tougher and tougher because of the property taxes and estate taxes and the death taxes. now new york is saying we are going to give you more people, going to give you homeless people and the mayor who is actually doing a great job experiencing spectacular renaissance. i'm the spokesperson for the boys & girls club's of new jersey, so proud of those kids in north new jersey, it's a great town now. now is suing mayor de blasio, can't make this up because you

can't send us your people, just give us a couple dollars, it is not fair to the homeless, not fair to north new jersey, it is just unconscionable. >> tucker: it also tells you an awful lot about what mr. progressive bill de blasio things about the majority black new york. a great to see you, thank you. the opioid epidemic kills more than 100 people every day in this country. interferes with a face no consequences. how? in part by buying positive coverage from a think tank in washington. remarkable story next. my parents never taught me anything about managing money.

the amount of student loan debt i have, i'm embarrassed to even say. we just decided we didn't want debt any longer. ♪ i didn't realize how easy investing could be. i'm picking companies that i believe in. ♪ i think sofi money is amazing. ♪ thank you sofi. sofi thank you, we love you. ♪

>> tucker: close to 50,000 americans died from opioids last year, about one death every 10 minutes. you must you're never anyone in power talk about what's happening but it's changing this country forever, communities are collapsing, entire zip codes are being depopulated. how did this start? it started with men in lab coats, the maker of oxycontin. when oxycontin was introduced, pretty acclaimed without any evidence at all the users of it were unlikely to become addicted to the product. that was a lie that caused an epidemic. they turned out to be terrifyingly addictive, many hundreds of thousands of americans have entered into a death spiral of addiction after being prescribed these drugs by doctors. the disaster began more than 20 years ago and yet only now is purdue pharma collapsing under the weight of a wave of lawsuits. head of the company get away with this for so long? the answer tells you so much

about how the propaganda machine works in modern america. having made billions destroying an entire generation, used some of those profits to play for their publicity. according to reporting, from 2003 until very recently, gave $50,000 a year to the american enterprise institute. is a conservative thing to take in washington, one of the richest. the money turned out to be very well spent. for the price of a car, purdue pharma bought years of positive coverage that help the company escape scrutiny for the many deaths it was causing at the same time. in 2004, and ai's father published a piece of "the new york times" lamenting doctors who risked jail time overprescribing pain pills. that article said it was almost nonexistent among those who had been prescribed the drug. as it turns out, the study was conducted and paid for by

purdue pharma researchers. yet the article didn't mention that key fact. also didn't mention the fact that the piece had been coordinated directly with the drug company. he emails show that the scholar, the one who wrote the piece, sent a draft of the article to purdue pharma's chief lobbyist a month before the article came out seeking his approval of the text and making certain it didn't seem to blatantly pro purdue. pretty stealthy. in 2007, that same scholar wrote an article for "the wall street journal" entitled oxymoron. the piece briefly chastised purdue for over promoting its drugs but then described oxycontin as "a godsend" and worried that physicians might not prescribe the drug in sufficient quantities print the problem is that america doesn't have enough of it. as for the many people starting to drop dead from foxy cotton, the article dismissed them as committed substance abusers. in the year that article

appeared, 18,000 people died of opioid overdose more than double the number before. was starting to rage out of control and yet according to the expert scholar, the real public health damage here comes from zealous prosecutors to demonize the drug itself. again, according to ai, the real crisis was not enough americans were taking oxycontin. this was in effect add copy. touting the life enhancing benefits of some new consumer product except in one key way, it was very different. readers had no idea it was an ad for oxycontin. they assumed it was what it claimed to be, scientific research by by a well-respected free-market think tank. no mention of funding from purdue pharma, meanwhile, thousands kept dying. many ironically in this country's reddest states. is of a conservative think tank

ran interference for a company whose products were disproportionately killing conservatives. just another day in washington. you're starting to suspect the conservative establishment doesn't really represent your interests, there's a reason for that. they are every bit as corrupt as you think they are. managing feminism is one of thet ideologies and swears allegiance to the theory, but is feminism actually making women, real women happy? one woman says no. she is here next.

>> tucker: hillary clinton's presidential campaign was a celebration of third wave feminism but if elizabeth warren gets the nomination in 2020, her campaign is promising something more, a full blown attack on men as a gender. watch this. >> i am exceptionally glad to be here in washington square park. i've wanted to give this speech right here and not because of the arch behind me or the president that this square is named for, nope. we are not here today because of famous arches or famous men. in fact, we are not here because of mad at all. >> tucker: because biology is not real. men have no role in our being here.

the question is, does all of this rhetoric and politics actually do anything for women, are they better off, are they happier than 50 years ago when it all began? great question rarely asked. author of the book women who may not love, she says they were for lies that feminism tells and instead of liberating women, making them miserable. they keep so much for coming on. so why does no one ever asked that question if this liberation movement which has been pretty transformative to the country is worth doing in the first place, are they happier? >> they are not happy here and we had that study several years ago that came out and showed that women are hard slightly less happy than men after this last 40 years of supposedly so-called liberation. and that drumbeat, that constant drumbeat of feminism -- feminist allies which is what this article i wrote was about is

absolutely having an enormous impact on our culture and on women and specifically on their relationships with men and our ability to build happy families. >> tucker: it is certainly noticeable. i don't think anything has changed our society more for the worst tell us what some of the lies are. >> there are actually more than four to be honest with you but that was for that i named there were the ones that were the biggest ones that came to my mind which was number one, women don't need men and that is of course espouse left and right in all kinds of ways throughout the media, the second one is that men and women are the same or that gender is a social construct instead of biologically driven, the third one is that there is no such thing as a biological clock so we are not allowed to even talk about that because god forbid women have babies and get derailed on their careers and we want them to be in the workforce

full-time all the type and on the fourth one is a career is more meaningful than marriage and children. in >> tucker: so what you are describing is a movement that is at war with nature, is at war with physical reality and with biology itself, what does that say? it sounds like a kind of delusion. >> it is a delusion, a complete delusion and it is based on that very idea that gender is again the social construct that if we just change the way we raise boys & girls club, men and women eventually were males and females would eventually become interchangeable and so we know of course that that is ridiculous and that is why in the face of common sense and evolutionary biology and one of the things that really makes that obvious is when women hit around the age of 30 because prior to that, it is true that men and women live very similar parallel lives, but right around that age of 30 is when women get

angst ridden and realize we'd a minute, i have a biological clock i'd better read hereto if i want to have a family, how my going to construct -- where have all the good men gone. he may have heard that study just about a month ago that came out and showed there is a lack of economically attractive men for women to marry. you don't need men, why would that even be a thing? obviously, it is still a thing. >> tucker: it is all such a horrible lie that has shafted all of us and particularly the young women. is better to behold, thank you for explaining it as clearly as you did and i hope that you awaken people to what's going on because it is important. great to see you tonight. that is it for us tonight, back tomorrow, the show that is the sworn and totally sincere enemy of smugness and groupthink. dvr it if you can figure that out. sean hannity is next. see you tomorrow.

>> sean: welcome to hannity, we begin with many fox news alert's, an unbelievable day, a lot of news to cover tonight, so many breaking stories including details from the fires of abuse reported. had a train wreck press conference with nancy pelosi that left her receiving with range, have that tape and more fallout but first with the 2020 election and only 334 days, you have the power, i do have hope and optimism because the radical far left socialist democratic party is now in shambles tonight from top to bottom.