Skip to main content

tv   Hannity  FOX News  December 5, 2019 6:00pm-7:00pm PST

6:00 pm
see you tomorrow. >> sean: welcome to hannity, we begin with many fox news alert's, an unbelievable day, a lot of news to cover tonight, so many breaking stories including details from the fires of abuse reported. had a train wreck press conference with nancy pelosi that left her receiving with range, have that tape and more fallout but first with the 2020 election and only 334 days, you have the power, i do have hope and optimism because the radical far left socialist democratic party is now in shambles tonight from top to bottom.
6:01 pm
because it's filled with so-called elites who were totally detached from reality. but they think they're better, they're smarter, more capable than all of us. obama said remember, they were better, we cling to our god, we do, we believe in the second amendment, true. our bible, absolutely, and our religion. hillary clinton called us he redeemable deplorables. while jerry nadler hauled in three ivory tower radical anti-trump as far left as you can go college professors to educate we the uninformed masses on the virtues of impeachment. one professor that wanted trump impeached for tweeting the words fake news. and today during this disastrous town hall, couldn't believe this. a very agitated joe lost it. he went off on an 83 year old
6:02 pm
voter. he called the guy fat, then denied it, claimed that he is a liar, belittled this guy. suggesting the man had a low iq then challenged him to a push-up contest competition so why did joe snap? because dared to ask a question about of zero experience hunter in the millions he's making sitting on a board of the corrupt ukrainian oil and gas giant burisma holding all while his father, the vice president of the united states served as the obama administration's point person on all things ukraine. you have to watch you watch by it and viciously voter for asking what the media mob should be asking, a very important question. >> didn't work for a gas company that he had no experience with. you are selling excess just like he is.
6:03 pm
>> you are a liar, man. that's not true but no one has ever said that. i know you do, and that's why i am not sedentary, i get up. let him go. let him go. the reason i'm running is because i've been around a long time and i know more than most people know and i can get things done. that's why i'm running. you want to check my shape on it, let's do push-ups, do whatever you want to do. no one has said my son have anything wrong and no one has ever said it. you said i set up my son to work in an oil company. isn't that what you said? get your words straight, jack. you don't do that on msnbc. look, here's the deal.
6:04 pm
>> it look like you don't have any more backbone than trump does. >> let him talk. >> any other questions? >> i'm not voting for you. >> i knew you weren't. you are too old to vote for me. >> sean: yeah, man. want to have a push-up contest, jack. how is he even a candidate? voters be warned, you asked joe about his very real ukraine scandal, he might challenge you to a duel or push-up contest and call you fat and insult your intelligence, fly off the handle and lose it but he definitely won't answer your question and if the corrupt media mob ever gets their way, you will never have to answer for his very real abuse of power. we all know the evidences they are, creepy crazy uncle joe was right about one thing, you are not going to hear about this on msnbc or fake news cnn or anywhere else in the mob media
6:05 pm
because they are state run liberal tv. doing a press conference following his meltdown, biden was at once challenge as he continued to trash this poor guy, 83 years old over and over again. take a look. >> i lose my temper, what i wanted to do was shut this down. you saw the reaction of all the people here, you saw the response so what did bother me as he didn't give the microphone back and kind of pulled away and what i wanted to make clear to him was that if he gets more out of control, this is not appropriate behavior at all. >> sean: you said no, let him go. and there it is, former vice president calling and 83-year-old guy strange or fat, a liar, insulting his intelligence at the same town hall, the same one biden said he was in ohio, in iowa, also claimed he was the vice president in 1976, can't
6:06 pm
make this up. but sure. i that voter is the one out of control. this is not a good look for uncle joe or the democratic party. he is starting to crack. and voters are now understanding the incontrovertible truth, the overwhelming evidence because in 2014, vice president biden was appointed as this country's point person for ukraine. a short time later, zero experience hunter was hired to serve on the board of paris is burisma holdings. he was paid millions of dollars, zero experience in gas, zero experience in energy, zero experience and ukraine, 0 for 3 instead of experience, he was peddling access. turns out it was a great investment because in 2016, hunter biden and his company faced a corruption investigation by ukraine's top prosecutor who came to the rescue? daddy. joe biden, the vice president
6:07 pm
demanding a prosecutor in ukraine be fired. joe biden actually leveraged and brags about leveraging a billion u.s. tax dollars in aid to get a prosecutor and ukraine fired. why? he was told by "the new york times" and others that that prosecutor was investigating a zero experience son being paid millions. remember, vice president biden bragged, told the president of ukraine on that i am getting on a plane in six hours. you are not getting a billion dollars, you are not going to get it. they fire the prosecutor and hunter is in the clear. that is a quid pro quo by joe. could you imagine the reaction if this was don jr, eric trump, or 13-year-old barron trump, a teenager? that's how low the democrats have sunk, going after a teenager. that's how repulsive they now are. imagine if it was trump bragging. unless you fire the prosecutor,
6:08 pm
don jr. zero experience. let's be honest about this in the mob in the media has no credibility ever. this is -- you've got to take this in. breathtaking hypocrisy and corruption. the mob media is state run democratic tv and now breaking this week, a judge has ruled hunter biden doesn't have to turn over his financial files, so soon, we might know exactly how much he actually made and how much was in the i never got a penny from china, how much equity did he get in that deal with the bank of china? 's lawyers said he hasn't cashed as equity yet and technically hasn't gotten a penny yet and if democrats are able to pass impeachment in the house, the bidens will likely now be called to testify during the republican-controlled senate trial. is it going to be must-see tv, but telling reporters he is not going to appear voluntarily because quid pro quo joe has a
6:09 pm
lot to hide and also breaking tonight, a big story in "the wall street journal" by their editorial board, ship's broad definition bribery would mean that joe could also easily be impeached. said that would be your real insurance policy. joining is now, fox news contributor dan bongino, fox news poll responded that large geraldo rivera. i stayed away from the drug issue, you are not the father, i stayed off that because that is different than the corruption here. his father we know leveraged a billion dollars and said you are not getting it. zero experience, paid millions of dollars. isn't that a real scandal? >> i think a couple of things, i disagree with your characterization of the former vice president. i thought he was at his absolute best, almost pulled a geraldo today.
6:10 pm
>> sean: stopped. >> i think that the key point here is whether or not joe and/or hunter biden can reasonably be called to testify in the impeachment trial in the united states senate. i would say they can be called. i think they can. aside from the no quid pro quo than the fact that there is no victim because president zelensky said that muscle wasn't put on him to go along and investigate the bidens, the fact of the matter is that you have joe biden taking a very controversial political stance that is threatening the billion dollars in aid if they didn't fire the prosecutor back in 2016 and hunter biden obviously with the sweetheart deal, 30,000 a month for a fellow that didn't know his elbow. so i think they can both be
6:11 pm
reasonably called. will object and go to the courts, the courts will decide but if they think this is going to be the same one-way street that they've had up until now, they are sorely mistaken. this is going to be rough-and-tumble. the republicans want to go down that road, they can muddy up a lot of democrats. the conclusion is a foregone conclusion anyway, the president will be acquitted but joe biden's confidence that he is not going to go anywhere near washington is sorely misplaced. >> sean: dan bongino, the federal rules of evidence are applied which i would assume the chief justice of the supreme court would follow. that would mean that there was only one fact witness that we've heard from. everyone else is either hearsay or opinion witness. not relevant or admissible. that would be ambassador sondland. what did he say? i asked the president what do you want, nothing. and no quid pro quo, they
6:12 pm
released it and they never announced anything. there is no case. but the bidens are the guilty, it is almost comical how they contort themselves to avoid that fundamental truth. >> he was an actual judge unlike the posers up on the hill, most of them are, some of them never had real jobs before and said this is a hearsay case based on hearsay leg joe told tony who heard from barbara who heard from marianne. this is a joke of a case against the president. you are right, there is one first-hand witness spoke to the president who told him i want nothing from ukraine and then the double down, gordon sondland, the only fact witness in the case proceeds to text, a text we have all seen, one of our officials in ukraine and then says i want to be crystal clear, the president said no
6:13 pm
quid pro quo. on the other hand as you accurately stated, you have joe biden literally, not figuratively, on tape saying he demanded a prosecutor be fired. who is conveniently investigating a company that hired his kid has exactly a big fat zero experience in anything related to natural gas which the company operates. this is almost a joke, a tailor-made case for the republicans against the democrats. >> sean: i have to give the night to dan but i still love my friend, my brother geraldo, thank you both. biden isn't the only democrat cracking under pressure in the house judiciary committee come on that's enough, pelosi announces the democrats are full steam ahead on impeachment. that was fast. but when a reporter asks just why the democrats plan to impeach the duly elected
6:14 pm
president, she had a full on public meltdown because she got called out. she knew it was a train wreck yesterday, take a look. >> the facts in the constitution give us no choice but to impeach, move forward with impeachment of the president. i don't hate anybody. i was raised in a catholic house, we don't hate anybody. not anybody in the world. >> as a catholic, i resent you using the word hate in a sentence that addresses me. i don't hate anyone. i was raised in a way that is a heart full of love and always prayed for the president. i still pray for the president. i pray for the president all the time. so don't mess with me when it comes to words like that. >> sean: like biden, pelosi is seething with rage and i won't bring up the whole catholic issue, but the facts are on her side.
6:15 pm
yesterday and the only official impeachment hearing, the judiciary committee heard from for left-wing radical liberal law professors, actually three of which hate the president. including one who wrote that trump could be impeached for actually tweeting the term fake news. impeach him for that and also praised sharia law. and then another presser who invoked the president's 13-year-old son and a sick, ugly, repulsive joke and trash conservatives during an anti-trump podcast and also had this to say about "white men." listen to this. >> the rich pampered prodigal sanctimonious white, straight times of the powerful do pretty well everywhere in the world and they always have. but what about us? snarky bisexual jewish women who want the freedom to say what we think, read what we want, and love who we do.
6:16 pm
>> sean: that was democrats impartial star witness, the only witness called by republicans constitutional caller jonathan turley ran circles around other witnesses with intellectual honesty, common sense and reason applied. he destroyed the democrats insane narrative and when he got home, his office was inundated with threatening messages demanding that he be fired. that is why we call them a mob and of course, none of yesterday's witnesses witnessed anything which means today we only have heard from a grand total of one fact witness grade who others are hearsay or opinion witnesses. that is not admissible under the federal rules of evidence. that was gordon sondland, he testified and gave conjecture and opinion but when he testified what he knew on the facts, trump wanted nothing, no quid pro quo, matt gaetz demonstrated this impeachment charade is baseless, feckless, witness list, and it is a scam. take a look.
6:17 pm
>> to all of the witnesses, if you have personal knowledge of a single material fact in the report, please raise your hand. and let the record reflect no personal knowledge of a single fact and that continues on the tradition that we saw from adam schiff where ambassador taylor could not identify an impeachable offense. never met with the president, fiona hill never referenced anything regarding military aid. mr. hale was unaware of any nefarious activity. colonel vin vindman denied that bribery was invoked, mr. morrison said there was nothing wrong on the call. the only direct evidence came from gordon sondland who spoke to the president of united states and the president said i want nothing. no quid pro quo. >> sean: let the record reflect case closed, checkmate. i yelled back the remaining time i have rated not hearing from
6:18 pm
any actual fact witnesses because again, the facts are not on the democrats side and they are not changing. watch this. >> four key facts have not changed and will never change. we have the transcript, there was no quid pro quo in the transcript. the two guys on the call both said no pressure, no pushing, the ukrainian third didn't know that the aide was held up at the time of the phone call and forth and most important, ukrainians never started, i never promised to start, and never announced an investigation and the time that the aide was paused. never once. but you know what did happen in those 55 days at the aide was paused? they were five key meetings between president zelensky and senior officials in our government. none of those five meetings was aide ever discussed in exchange for an announcement of an investigation to anybody, not one of them. >> sean: five meetings after,
6:19 pm
never discussed, they did nothing. was never discussed on the call, they got the money and didn't do anything and it wasn't discussed in any of "the five" subsequent high level meetings including the vice president. president trump had every reason to be concerned about ukraine corruption. look at this. according to a ukrainian court, let's read it from the record linda january 11th 2017 report from politico, ukraine interfered in the 2016 election for you dopes in the media, that doesn't mean we don't know that russia interfered. they are a hostile act or regime and devin nunes formed in 2014 they would do it and biden and obama did nothing. so did ukraine. look at politico. indians the operative worked with ukrainian embassy to release his campaign to boost
6:20 pm
hillary clinton. so in that report, is at an unfounded conspiracy theory? they determined the country of ukraine was interfering. let me educate you you and thea mob. i pointed out many times russia is a hostile regime led by a hostile actor, vladimir putin who more flexibility with, release those transcripts. everyone agrees they meddled in the election. devin nunes warned about it and also look at hillary clinton's dirty russian dossier that you all ignored and the mob. according to "the new york times," they finally concluded it was likely russian disinformation from the beginning. russia interfered in our elections but every indication is ukraine did as well. that january 11th 2017 political report details at all. ukrainian court also ruled that the country interfered in our 2016 election. not mutually exclusive and it wasn't just russia and ukraine, don't forget china likely hacked
6:21 pm
hillary's secret server. we are told in real time. did iran and north korea, who knows how many countries hacked that server and attempted to interfere in our elections. so president trump tells zelensky do us a favor. plus referring to your country and ours. we've been through three years of this, help us get to the bottom of it. i thought democrats cared about that. in other words, foreign interference in our election and also warned the new president i don't like who you are surrounding yourself. you look like you're surrounding yourself with the same guy the other guy did. the president wasn't wearing a hand over millions of dollars to ukraine. good for him, here we are, democratic party want to undo an election because the president was performing duly executing his job, his sworn duty. faithfully executing the laws of the land, it is disgusting and repulsive end in 334 days, you get to decide the fate of this great republic, the choice
6:22 pm
couldn't be more clear. the president has delivered on every promise after promise, look at your screen. going to keep it scrolling. joining us now, thank god for them, look at the "washington examiner," 290 or so things the president has accomplished, big things that every conservative would dream of. three years of do-nothing democrats, where is this going? >> where it's coming is that democrats cannot be president trump in a reelection bid, the president has kept his promises, our economy is good and is going to get better and you know what, they are willing to say and do anything to have him removed from office and that is why you see they logged on to that, latched on to that, latched onto that in november 9th 2016 the day after president trump was elected and they've been going at him ever since then he saw it on display yesterday and that pitiful
6:23 pm
hearing with these very bitter liberal professors, those three all basically willing to say the one guy saying i am now a convert to impeachment. he was talking about impeachment two years ago. they are willing to say and do anything to remove this president but the demarcation between president trump and the republicans on the democrat choices is remarkable and i just think that's where they are going, they are going to do anything. >> sean: congressman turner, great job by you. can you explain the bifurcation? the only fact witness, he wants nothing, no quid pro quo but then all the stuff with joanne hunter, how do you explain this a rational bifurcation and hypocrisy which is breathtaking? >> you've been pointing out the stuff that they are taking, not just their attempts to undo the election that is the problem here, it is the fact that we have a facts list impeachment being undertaken.
6:24 pm
has no legal standard, it is a political impeachment. you take the hearsay and innuendo, the conclusions that the adam schiff report provides as a basis for impeachment, you can apply it to any scenario and thereby justify impeachment as you said on "the wall street journal" was saying what we know about joe biden, hunter biden, burisma issue is enough already, if it's enough to impeach trump, it's enough to impeach joe biden day one, not advocating for that but that's the standard that they are advocating for. literally, obama with the irs scandal where they were targeting conservative groups you could also perceive impeachment based on that. >> sean: amazing job, republicans this week did a fantastic job. and i've been very critical of the republican party, not the freedom caucus but thank you both. when we come back, we will see some of the mob defending the
6:25 pm
impeachment witness attacking a 13-year-old teenager. that has to stop. the president's press secretary stephanie grisham responds and also house minority leader kevin mccarthy straight ahead.
6:26 pm
6:27 pm
6:28 pm
>> sean: not only is them mob
6:29 pm
and the media fawning over the impeachment scam hearing, they are defending one of the democrats witnesses punch line. about a teenager, a 13-year-old innocent kid. just a small sample of their repulsive this. >> she used upon them. you don't drag the story through the mud and act shocked and stunned and still waiting for her to ask her husband to apologize for face shaming my wife, lying about my wife, saying that she was bleeding badly from the face-lift. >> maybe they missed this part, but she was not speaking about the child. she was speaking about his name. >> sean: okay. the kids and adults, very big difference. beyond the cheap shots, any common sense american knows that just like that show, expose the
6:30 pm
democrats hunt only focused on one thing. raging, hating, impeaching president trump for the crime of winning the 2016 election creative remember congressman al green, we better impeach him for we are not going to beat him? just admitted they will teach ih him again. >> moving forward with what we have on the table currently, we can take this before the senate and we can still investigate other issues and when the president has committed additional offenses and my suspicion is that he will, we can take those before the senate. there is no limit on the number of times the senate can vote to convict or not a president, no limit to the number of times a house can vote to impeach or not a president. >> sean: white house press secretary stephanie grisham. i have to be honest, my temper, it is hard now. everybody is fair game.
6:31 pm
i get the beaten out of me every day, i can take it. don jr. can take it, eric can take it. when you're going after the first lady or a teenage kid, this is a line that is crossed but yet they justify it. how come that is allowed? if it was anybody going after short of michelle obama saying for the first time i am proud of my country, bring yourself into the arena, pitts has crossed lines we've never seen. >> i agree on that is the tolerant left for you and the left wing media for you. minor children of any president in any administration should be off limits and the fact that after that professor said that, the room erupted in laughter was beyond the pale, really unfortunate and what was also unfortunate was some media seem to really revel in it. pbs data, the view data. was really unfortunate but that's what it is with the trump
6:32 pm
administration right now. >> sean: you work with the first lady, good for her yesterday, i applaud her for calling this out for what it is, and you would think that the media instead of defending it would say everybody else is fair game, if you are dishing it out, you're going to take some incoming. they defend it. has it gotten that bad that we now have to attack a kid and we have to attack the first lady? helping with opioids, reading to children. >> yes. the answer to that is yes. the left is so angry at this president's excess that that's all they have left is to attack the first lady who is doing nothing to help children and attack the minor child of the first family. the american public sees it for what it is. that hearing was a joke, it was very embarrassing and this morning, i thought nancy pelosi was going to come out and say you made a mistake, let's get to work and do usmca.
6:33 pm
they had tea with what a joke that hearing was. she didn't, they are moving forward with impeachment. i think they were going to be a lot of dems that are hurt here. the american people see what they are doing when they are going down the road of attacking a 13-year-old child and attacking the first lady. they are desperate right now. >> sean: you work with the first lady a long time and when jimmy kimmel -- we had a big fight that i won and i dare him to start it up again. jimmy, start it, one more time. i have a lot to bring out. i was just ready on the verge of unloading it all. but here is the thing. because she speaks five languages, english is her fifth, she has traveled the world since being a teenager, highly successful, nice, smart, intelligent and gets attacked for helping kids and trying to end the opioid epidemic. and then they attack her teenage
6:34 pm
son, her 13-year-old son. attacked him before he became a teenager. >> he has been the subject to attacks for a long time but your point about the first lady is exactly true. this was any other administration, the first lady would be hailed and would be in all kinds of publications and talking about be best in all of the things that she is doing to help children. but she keeps her head down, she continues to work and it does not bother her. she was attacked the other day about the tote she wore at a christmas video. is not bothering her at all paired the first family is very strong, the president is very strong, we are used to this by now. has happened before he even took office. that's okay, the results this family is showing for this country is what matters. >> sean: think you for all you do and for being with us at my offer stands, jimmy kimmel, i dare you, start up again.
6:35 pm
i will unload like you've never seen. i've got it all racked up and ready to go. also developing tonight, we have the compromise corrupt congenital liar claiming that he did nothing wrong and that there was never a subpoena for the phone records that devin nunes and john solomon and maybe little old me react to the developing story. fox news contributor john solomon the last i checked, part of the job of talk show host, reporters is that they call sources did they do digging, they do fact-checking, they double check. you would expect that your phone records would be released and was one of mine released? >> i didn't remember seeing one of yours in there, it's possible but i will say this, the idea that adam schiff said no big deal, i took a lawyer's record, rudy giuliani's and then extracted john solomon's from and published it is not any more comforting to me or my privacy rights and if he had subpoenaed my records.
6:36 pm
i have said from the beginning they knew they had subpoenaed and extracted mine. but it is designed to chill my reporting. i have been an inconvenient reporter for the democratic narrative over the last three years. they went after collusion, we helped unravel collusion. the party of no corruption family brought up the joe biden corruption and this is a personal payback by the democrats to try to embarrass me by releasing my phone records but there's nothing embarrassing, the fact i can talk to the president's lawyer ought to be seen as a good thing by journalists. >> sean: i know you to be because i've been in situations, you are asking for transparency. i know that to be a fact. the other thing is that we do know certain things. we know that alexander chill luca did go to the ukrainian embassy. she was working for and paid by the dnc for purposes to dig up dirt on then candidate trump and his campaign people like
6:37 pm
paul manafort and so i'm watching this, that reporting is accurate and i think it's pretty accurate on the record that zero experience hunter was paid millions while his son was being investigated, 1 of 3 groups of people, you, "the washington post," and abc interviewed the prosecutor and you three interviewed him and he confirmed for you he was fired because of joe's demand with billion dollars as leverage. >> he was overseeing the investigation of burisma where he worked. i watch that episode today, that farmer was right about something. before hunter biden was hired just a few weeks before he was hired, joe biden told the ukrainians ramp up your natural gas and what happen? happen? all of a sudden, his son got hired. he set it up by giving that speech to the prime minister and that farmer actually had the right script, joe biden is the one that doesn't have the facts
6:38 pm
right. >> sean: great and thank you. i am a talk show host emma we do straight reporting, we do investigative reporting, we do opinion, sports, culture. that is being part of the press. we have a free press, good job, thank you. and we also call sources, that's how you break stories. more reaction in the impeachment sprint, kevin mccarthy. good to see you again. i think you should be very proud of your team and you know when i've been critical of republicans, very loud about it. but this has been a moment where clarity, can you explain how the media and the democrats ignored the hunter-joe situation? >> they ignore almost everything and you have to remember here if i was a democrat and i was sitting in one of those 31 seats that president trump carried and i listen to speaker pelosi today, i would be concerned because she just gave away your
6:39 pm
seat. for her to move forward after listening to these hearings after hearing, if you watched john charlie last night, a democrat, he did not vote for trump, he says this is the thinnest and weakest impeachment in the history of america. he said the only abuse of power is the democrats moving forward with this. >> sean: i agree with all of this, but all of the protections that speaker gave to clinton, they got to choose the date that it started, gave them two and a half weeks to prepare, also got a chance to cross-examine, a chance to bring witnesses. everything was afforded and in the secret meetings in the private ones not even releasing the transcripts yet, telling witnesses not to answer, republicans call nobody, no fact witnesses who says the president asked for nothing, the rest would never be admissible in any court of law.
6:40 pm
how are we at this point? i am trying to understand it. >> we are at this point because when you listen to the speaker today, that was no new news. they wrote this timeline a long time ago. the day they got elected the majority, you had nadler run for the committee of impeachment based upon he would be best for impeachment. you have the freshman that gave him the majority the night she was sworn in that if she was going to impeach the president and then cost about it. >> sean: i will say it. >> you had al green admits that the only reason he needed to impeach him was because if he did not, he would win reelectio reelection. now they tried to fill it in, but they have no proof. >> sean: then he said they can impeach him over and over again. you don't believe pelosi, this
6:41 pm
is got to be driven by hate. it's even worse than that and if there's anything worse, i don't know. she knows her job is on the line, this radical group of democrats, she wants to remain speaker. she loves impeaching this president because giving of the entire away has wasted however her majority on only investigating and trying to impeach this presidents that tells you a lot about how much she loves to impeach him because she put the country aside. no usmca no prescription drugs, not rebuilding our country. all of the things that we have wasted because the only desire is to impeach this president. >> sean: great job leading the republican party, it is nice to see for once correct, a backbone, a spine, a commitment
6:42 pm
to standing up for what's right. that's a change. you have to admit. all the show boats on repeal and replace and in it when it comes down to it, we are already but hopefully things are changing, thank you. when we come back, a brawl literally breaks out at a pete buttigieg event. hillary clinton hints again she may be jumping on the 2020 race. later, we will also reveal what did the obama's nearly spend $12 million on? was at homeless people, opioid epidemic? the answer coming up. in the human brain, billions of neurons play in harmony.
6:43 pm
6:44 pm
6:45 pm
6:46 pm
for people with parkinson's, some neurons change their tune, causing uncontrollable tremors. now, abbott technology can target those exact neurons. restoring control and harmony, once thought to belost forever. the most personal technology is technology with the power to change your life. the amount of student loan debt i have, i'm embarrassed to even say. we just decided we didn't want debt any longer. ♪ i didn't realize how easy investing could be. i'm picking companies that i believe in. ♪ i think sofi money is amazing. ♪ thank you sofi. sofi thank you, we love you. ♪
6:47 pm
>> sean: and other breaking news today, three former obama administration officials are now endorsing mayor pete for president but not everything is going so well for
6:48 pm
him. a brawl broke out had an event for the candidate last night. nothing like a good brawl. take a look. >> i will address you guys in a few minutes if you give me my time in that respect, i will do the same thing. >> where the black leaders? where are the black leaders? they are here to talk about pete buttigieg. why are we talking about pete buttigieg? >> sean: i'm sorry. i the lady with a cane, that is
6:49 pm
priceless. this is speculation again joining the primary after she appeared on howard stern's show. here now with reaction, we have attorney darrell parks, nationally syndicated radio talk show host larry elder and conservative columnist, former fake news cnn host. i don't know, i like hockey, i played hockey as a kid, used to fight every day and i kind of liked it. >> only in america can a meeting that was set up by black leaders to show their support for mayor pete be crashed by black lives matter activists with the ringleader apparently a white activist who takes the microphone away from the black speaker. only in america. the only question is how are they going to blame this on donald trump? >> sean: that's a great point. i'll give you the best shot. >> without question, we've seen
6:50 pm
mayor pete having trouble around the country, having trouble in south bend as well. there are seven polls now that have donald trump in terms of support in the black community anywhere from 16 to 34.5%. 1: , 34.5, another poll 33. he got 8% of the black vote in 2016, but he sent record after record, black unemployment, look at his criminal justice reform bill. every democrat said they do it, he got it done. >> without question, they were still work to be done. he needs to find a way. >> sean: no one has sent record after record, historically low black unemployment. i shouldn't he get credit for that? >> here is the deal. what type of difference does it?
6:51 pm
that's a question we have to ask. >> sean: he has created a million and a half jobs for the black community, more than obama did and biden in eight years. checkmate. >> we invite the president to continue to do better for the black community without question. >> sean: that is the weakest response. >> i think without question, there is work to be done. you can't say things that are already done. >> sean: great job, mr. president, keep going. to say those words, it is not that hard. >> i have written about this for a long time, the democratic party has a culture, founded and controlled by slave owners and then moved to segregationists and identity politics. the sun of segregation and the grandson of slavery. the interesting part of this as they are now starting to turn on each other and call them racist, not republicans which is sort of their standard. and now they are doing it to
6:52 pm
each other. is interesting here and mayor pete as their target. >> sean: when the president crescendos of speech with a strong ending, we are one glorious nation under god, we are one family. when our family succeeds and we set record after record of unemployment, i am happy for her family. can i finish my point please? this is a president who supports choice in school and majority of black and brown parents living in the inner-city want to be able to escape an underperforming government school. the majority of white democrats do not. they don't have their kids in these inner-city schools. president trump is pushing for choice. and that alone is something that causes black people to reconsider their traditional allegiance to a democratic part democratic party. great job president trump, keep going, go ahead and say it.
6:53 pm
>> great job, we look forward to president trump in the following year. you can't put words in my mouth. we welcome that. >> sean: that has not been your best appearance. we love you, though. when we come back, you won't believe what the obama -- what did the obama spend money on? homeless, opioid epidemic, i don't know. i hear over the day, you don't want to miss it. woman: my reputation was trashed online.
6:54 pm
6:55 pm
6:56 pm
i felt completely helpless. my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. vo: take control of your online reputation. get your free reputation report card at reputationdefender.com. find out your online reputation today and let the experts help you repair it. woman: they were able to restore my good name. vo: visit reputationdefender.com or call 1-877-866-8555.
6:57 pm
6:58 pm
>> ♪ >> sean: earlier tonight we asked you what former president barack obama did when he spent $12 million. did he give the money to the homeless? no brought a 30 acre mansion in
6:59 pm
martha's vineyard. liberals love to spend other people's money. it's his money. i want to highlight a hero of the day. we smelly wal-mart shoppers and trump voters. this is a real wal-mart employee. duped by a prankster. help me find this woman. watch this. >> [inaudible]. >> [muffled audio]. >> thank you. >> sean: i hope he has a good
7:00 pm
sense of humor. i want to find this woman. she said if you don't find it come back and i will do it again. that's such greatness. we want to give her something. laura ingraham, hi. >> laura: yes. >> sean: people were laughing. i hope she has a good sense of humor. come back in 5 minutes. i want to help you again. >> laura: were you one of those kids who would call 9-11 and order 10 pizzas? >> sean: yes. guilty. >> laura: why did i know that? >> sean: i was incoreigible. >> laura: a got an email i read on air. you were fast asleep by then. one of my viewers said i too often