series, "what made america great." talking about great things in america's past. sadly i'm not going to talk about america today because this is embarrassing all day long. meanwhile, i want you to stay here for the coverage as it happens. we will be here every step of the way. don't move. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." and this is a fox news alert at this hour. nutty jerry nadler circus, his schiff show is still ongoing. going to monitor this charade throughout the hour. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell will join us, he'll tell us if they impeach the president what will happen to the senate, and important information. we start november 8th 2016, 62 million americans, you, we the american people, we shocked the world. you voted for donald trump. he won a whopping 304 electoral votes, carried over 30 states. and now democrats are officially trying to flush that free and fair election down the toilet based on zero high crimes, zero

misdemeanors and zero counts of bribery and zero counts of treason. this what we got for three long years. just two made up baseless week fact lists charges that would never be allowed in a court of law. this boils down to one the one thing only. that is the left, liberals, democrats, socialists, and their media mob friends, they think they know better than we, the people that voted for this president. they look down their noses at us. fine. they have contempt for all values, our views, our life and way of life, they hate us, they hate our choice for president. so for three years, three long years, they have desperately tried to undo an election and impeach donald trump. don't take my word for it, just listen to their dear fearless leader, speaker pelosi. earlier this week, this is quite revealing. take a look. >> one of the biggest criticisms of the process has been the speed at which they are moving.

seriously, though. >> it's been going on for 22 months, okay? two and a half years, actually. >> sean: two and a half years? since he got here. rare moment of truth even for pelosi. way back in january 2017, it was the russia, russia, russia hoax in coordination with a corrupt, deceitful, propaganda state run socialist tv mob in the media, the democrats lied over and over and over again about trump, russia, collusion. the only collusion was a dirty russian dossier that hillary paid for. adam schiff said he has ample evidence of collusion. and we have the nadler show. by the way, he's running his own full schiff show and he said there was collusion in plain

sight pit or eric swalwell. a great newsroom for the presidency, saying the president acts on russia's behalf. maybe it was hillary who bought the russian dossier. nbc news chief conspiracy theorist area 51 rachel maddow calling trump a russian op, tom brokaw, speak up. are you proud of this? they are all lying to their teeth. they have smeared, slandered, this parchment for this is who they are, this is what they do. four separate investigations, zero russia collusion. zero. zip. huge blow to impeach the president. they thought mueller would get them to the finish line. instead of apologizing for years and putting the country through hell, they moved to plan b. let's move through a new conspiracy theory. and now the election fast approaching. democrats have nothing to waste now, they can't rely on the

american people to do their bidding. take a look. >> we cannot rely on election to solve our problems with the president threatens the very integrity of that election. so with a heavy heart, with clear and mine the duty to our country, i support these articles of impeachment. i urge my colleagues to support them as well. >> sean: despite his heavy, heavy, heavy, hard of nadler, he's racing this thing across the finish line. of course, pelosi announced a vote will take place next week. for the past ten straight hours, again today, democrats in the house judiciary committee, they've been holding an all day marathon, we've got to get it done before christmas hearing. we learned absolutely nothing new all day. no new facts presented. no evidence introduced.

everyone here say or opinion but instead they hear from a bunch of democratic lawmakers totally divorced from reality, living in the land of rage and hatred and psychosis against trump. one congressman them, comparing the impeachment charade to the civil rights and suffrage movements. wow, they think a lot of themselves. take a look. some will cynically argue that the impeachment of this president would further divide an already fractured union. slavery once divided the nation, but emancipators rose up to clarify all men are created equally. suffrage once divided the nation, but women rose up to clarify that all voices must be heard in our democracy. jim crow once divided the nation, but civil rights champions rose up to clarify that all are entitled to equal protection under the law. >> sean: all lies and all conspiracy theories have to be peddled.

per usual, democrats clearly more interested in the hyping of their own which trial than actually getting to any truth or real justice because the truth is not good for the democratic party. take a look. >> this amendment strikes the reference to joe biden as the center of the proposed investigation and replaces it with the true topic of the investigation, burisma and hunter biden. hurts called the press department and officers filed a narcotics offense report listing items seized in the car including a plastic bag containing white powdery substance, a secret service business card, credit cards, and hunter biden's driver's license. a little hard to believe that burisma hired hunter biden to resolve the international disputes when he could not resolve his own dispute with hertz rental car over leaving cocaine and a crack pipe in the car. congressman matt gaetz

advocating for an amendment to the articles of impeachment which would actually include language about hunter biden and, yes, zero experience in the millions he's paid. it's pretty simple. it's a quid, a pro, a bye hunter. zero experience, hunter, of course selling his access to his father. that's the evidence of real abuse of power which they ignored. that commitment ultimately defeated alongside party lines alongside several other amendments. the american people, we know what's going on here. this is nothing but a partisan circus to undo an election. resident shrimp will never be -- president trump will never e convicted in the senate. senator graham will dismiss and senator mcconnell will dismiss these phony charges. all the other republican senators, look at your screen. look at the 31 democrats from the districts that president trump carried in 2016. see nancy pelosi? she's now making all of those lawmakers walk the plank for nothing. sacrificing those seats to placate a radical extreme socialist. some of these lawmakers are starting to waffle and buckle under the pressure. >> are you ready to vote for

them? >> what i'm going to do now is what i was always trying to do as a cia officer. sit by myself with a full body of information. >> sean: the question going forward is will these lawmakers do pelosi's bidding or the people to actually represent, the people who hired them because the constituents are pretty ticked off about the democrats' latest political stunt and the fact they do nothing. take a look. >> [bleep]. it's a laugh. it's all a laugh. >> hasn't done anything wrong!

spewing americans across the country have every right to be angry tonight for joining us now, florida congressman matt gaetz. people got mad at you and they got your back. there's no evidence here. just the opposite. one fact witness, everything is hearsay and opinion, matt. here's where they take the country, the three years of doing nothing for the people of this country. >> you are right, sean. democrats have attacked president trump, president zelensky, and even me in this hearing, but what they haven't attacked are the facts in the law that showed the president has done nothing wrong and should not be facing this illegitimate impeachment. democrats have lost ground in the polls and either they will lose votes on the floor tomorrow or they will lose the majority. each and every time that they reference conduct they believe is wrong and improper about the president, we are able to show a deeper understanding of why the president is fighting against corruption, using different tools to accomplish american foreign policy.

you know what? the results are in. the american economy is thriving, the american experienced is enhanced. >> sean: how many democrats you talking to, your colleagues, your friends, how many of them think >> let's start with the standard nancy pelosi said, just remember she, adam schiff, jerry nadler all said the impeachment would have to be bipartisan. right now, the only bipartisan support is against impeachment. not for impeachment. they could even lose more tomorrow. speed when they already dove out of the plane but how many democrats are going to say, you walk the plank alone. this is idiotic and political suicide? >> you should see! all 31 democrats in the trump districts opposing this impeachment in working with us to try to make america great again. instead, there is a pep rally environment among house democrats where they are going to act against their constituents, against the own political

interest because the radical left has taken over the narrative in washington, d.c., the democratic caucus. i do, though, sean, believe that democrats could actually lose more support than even previously. what's interesting about that is they told us so many times that once they had public hearings, once they put witnesses before the american people that somehow this would fundamentally shift the polling and it hasn't. democrats are right where they've always been and the majority of the american people do not support this impeachment. you know what? they are going to hold it against the democrats who continue to advance this cause. >> sean: thank you for that report. thank you for being with us. when these bogus articles of impeachment make their way over to the u.s. senate, republicans can finally put an end back to this madness. >> we are just out of britain following a national election. it is now going to clear the

path. britain's conservative party by prime minister boris johnson projected to win a resounding victory over the labour party. conservatives will occupy a large majority of seats in parliament, the biggest win since 1987, labor leader jeremy corbyn calls it disappointing and says he will not leave his party in the next election. this is indication for johnson who rose to the position of prime minister 20 weeks ago based on his support. strong support for brexit. with the ruling party behind him, johnson will now be able to ratify the deal he struck with the european union allowing the united kingdom to leave on january 31st, we are learning. but that is not to say it is all going to be easy for johnson from now on. the e.u. is still largest trading bloc in england has been a member for nearly 50 years. once great britain leaves, the

daunting challenge of striking new international trade deals for preserving lenton's position as a top, global financial capital and men think the politically divided nation. johnson will also have to negotiate another trade deal with president donald trump. britain's conservative party led by prime minister boris johnson is claiming a landslide victory over the labour party in thursday's national election. conservatives will occupy the majority in the seat in parliament with the ruling party behind him, johnson will swiftly ratify the brexit deal with the european union allowing the united kingdom to leave the world's largest trading block on january 31st. life in new york city, and we now return to the regularly scheduled programming already in progress. >> to the extent that we have we don't have the kind of control

where a typical issue will come to the house, if we don't like it we will take it up. we have no choice but to take it up. we'll work this process in a short period of time in total coordination with the white house counsel's office and the people representing the president. as well as the senate. >> sean: i've got to believe the federal rules for the admission of evidence would apply here with the chief justice in charge, that would mean there would be no hearsay evidence be allowed, that would probably mean, well, you might have one or two opinion people, fact experts. but when we watch this process unfold in the house, especially in the schiff show, everybody was hearsay or opinion witness. the one fact witness said, the president said he wanted nothing, no quid pro quo. that was the only fact with this that i saw a pair that would be ambassador sondland. with that be in your view how the federal rules of evidence apply here? >> exactly how we go forward i will coordinate with the president's lawyers, they would be no difference between us on how to do this. you raise the issue on what if

you have witnesses much like the president's counsel may or may not decide they want to have witnesses. the case is so weak. coming over from the house. we know how it's going to end. nope chance the president is going to be removed from office but my hope is there will be no single republican who votes for either of these articles of impeachment. sean, it wouldn't surprise me if we got one or two democrats. it looks to me over at the house the republicans seem to be solid and the democrats seem to be divided. >> i think you rightly point out, this is very weak. we look for example at the obstruction issue. here, the president like every other past president has exerted executive privilege. they don't like it when there is a dispute between the second of -- legislative branch and the

executive branch and that would be the role is to resolve the disputes between the other two branches of government but frankly they are in such a rush to do this they didn't want to give the courts any time or worse they feared what the courts would decide. >> this is a thoroughly political exercise. it's not a courtroom experience. it's a political experience. they've gone and screwed up the courage to do it. they've been trying to do this for three years. it looks to me that it may be backfiring on them particularly in swing districts that the speaker's party managed win. most of the nervousness i see on this issue with politicians since the political process is on the democratic side. >> sean: assume it comes over to the senate. you are obligated to take it up. everybody understands that. whoever the house chooses to present the case, they will present their case. however long period of time that takes. there is some dispute, and

actually i could probably be persuaded on either side, which for me is a rare thing, senator, and that would be okay. a lot of people would like to bring in adam schiff, hunter biden, joe biden. i think i'm more inclined to agree with senator graham on this. it's tempting, and they do believe that all of these things must be looked into per there are a lot of real questions here. but i don't know if that would be the appropriate forum once you have the 51 votes to end this, very weak case but i think it would be smart to do so. where would your inclination be? >> i'm going to take my cues from the president's lawyers. but yes, if you know you have the vote, listen to the arguments on both sides, and believe the case is so slim, so weak that you have the votes to end it, that might be what the president's lawyers would prefer, and you could certainly make the case for making it shorter rather than

longer since it's such a weak case. >> are you confident -- we've talked about for example the obstruction charge and the other would be the abuse of power charge. you read the phone call. you watch, i'm sure, a lot of the coverage that has taken place in the house. do you see any evidence of any wrongdoing whatsoever on the president's part as you read the transcript, i read it over and over again. i certainly don't see what we hear joe biden bragging about. you are not getting a billion taxpayer dollars unless you are a prosecutor invest getting his son with zero experience making millions. that didn't happen. >> this is a really weak case and that's why i think you are going to see bipartisan opposition to the articles over in the house. >> sean: how long are you thinking and we will move on from here, how long do you imagine after the house presents its case, that will happen in full -- >> if they do this next week, sean, we will be able to have to

go over christmas but we will turn about it right around the first of the year and we would stay on that until we finish. my hope is that it will be a shorter process rather than a long, lengthy process. >> you have your book and -- look, donald trump is a lot of things and i've known him probably longer than you, well over 20 something odd years. he's disruptive. he's an iconoclast. he's a fighter. he's got a lot of good things done for the country. kept a lot of promises with your help on judges, tax cuts, certainly he's got the money for the wall, ending burdensome regulation from a bitter trade -- better trade deals. the alba got a caliphate defeated. what do you know now what this president three years that you didn't know? >> let me tell you what this book is about. the book is about the most long-lasting observation that donald trump and the senate

republicans for the country end. and that is putting young men and women who are structuralists whose jobs are to follow the law in the courts. we did our 50th circuit court judge just yesterday. to put that in perspective, barack obama did 55 circuit judges in eight years. we did 50 in three years. and we have a year less for sure. we are going to do one fourth of the circuit judges. most cases did not make it to the supreme court. most complex litigation never makes it beyond the circuit courts. this has been the most long-lasting conjugation the -- contribution the president could make in the future, far beyond his tenure in office. we'll have a judiciary not to make it up on the fly. obama said he wanted to appoint judges who had empathy. that makes great sense if you are a litigate before the judge before whom the judge has

empathy, not so good if you are not. >> sean: let's say somebody were to retire at the end of this year, leading into the summer. you have been very clear if the president had supported somebody, you would follow through on that nomination. absolutely. >> we definitely would do that. and this paperback we were just talking about, the president's forward is about judges, the afterword catches us up what's happened with the trump administration on judges because my memoir came out three years ago before the president was elected. what we did here, the president and i did with this paperback that he was showing on the screen, talk about how the judge project came about, how it went forward. if you recalled, sean, the most important decision i made in my entire political career was to not fill the supreme court vacancy when justice scalia passed away. that was the beginning and we have the exclamation point here three years the public would be

interested to read about, that's why the president and i collaborated on this paperback. >> sean: i was surprised president obama left so many vacancies and didn't fill those vacancies. >> i will tell you why, i was in charge of what we did the last two years of the obama administration. >> sean: i will give you full credit for that and take a bow. congratulations on the vote. -- book. we will be watching very closely in the senate. do you see any possible affections? >> i doubt it. there is zero chance the president will be removed from office and i'm hoping we'll have no defections at all. >> sean: senator mitch mcconnell, thank you for being with us. >> thank you. >> sean: when we come back, eric holder. he's actually saying bill barr is unfit to lead the doj. we have his history. obama's former attorney general may want to take a real hard long look in the mirror before making that comment.

we will remind you. the great one mark levin is fired up. he'll joins us live as we continue. ♪ sfx: [sneezing] i am not for ignoring the first sign of a cold. i am for shortening my cold, with zicam! zicam is completely different. unlike most other cold medicines, zicam is clinically proven to shorten colds. i am a zifan for zicam! oral or nasal.

made it myself. i love this place! made that myself, too. order up. fries on the side. right where i like 'em. don't forget the grease fire. burn, baby -- wait, what? -[ alarm beeping ] -i said grease fire. what are you doing on the counter? when owning a small business gets real... sorry. can i get a to-go box? ...progressive helps protect what you built -with customizable coverage. -aah!

>> sean: the blake tint hypocrisy, dilution, hitting the extreme democratic socialist

party especially with formal obama general eric holder. he's attacking bill barr. really? accusing him of being unfit for the job? at this, running political interference for the president. the hypocrisy knows no end, the disconnect with reality stunning. shouldn't shock us. but it's e not the first time holder has taken a cheap shot at the current attorney general. take a look. >> has he ever reached out to you? >> no. he talks about me. he keeps saying, where's my roy cohn, i want my attorney general like holder was to obama. which is true. barr doing the best to protect him. he's broken through some of those norms that we talked about. he's too close to the president. there has to be a wall between the justice department and the white house.ou

>> sean: the last person we need a lecture from him is him eric holder. that same guy, literally called himself obama's "wing man" back in 2013 while he was the attorney general. "i am enjoying what i'm doing, still work to be done. i'm still the president's wingmen." want to talk about a institutional norms? abuse of power? remember back in 2012, eric holder actually held in contempt of congress in a bipartisan ipuse boat. -- vote. why? he failed to provide key documents related to the fast and furious gunrunning scandal. if you recall, fast and furious, that was the failed obama era gunrunning operation under holder's doj that led to the death of the border agent brian terry. o and others. those weapons were used numerous times. obama and his atf were actually so dumb that they let the guns be sold to illegal straw buyers

connected to cartels and they lost track of the weapons and people died.ed and holder was caught stonewalling congress for the key details about the failed program. how about those institutional norms mr. holder? your conduct was repulsive, dumb, as graceful. and don't forget, it was obama and holder, they were the ones responsible for the most egregious attacks on the press. you might number former fox news reporter james rosen, named as a coconspirator to commit espionage in some of the leak investigations? in fact, eric holder prosecuted more people under the espionage act than all previous attorney general's combined. by the way, the same espionage act that hillary clinton clearly violated and every subsection with that secret server with top-secret and classified information on it. oh, the irs scandalt of which there was never any real accountability for, despite

overwhelming evidence -- what, they targeted key party groups, guess who's in charge of that investigation? that guy, eric holder. when he was in office and since he left, holder has continued to sow division and push the political instability that he claims to be, again -- here's just a small sample of the sanctimonious, self righteous hypocrite in his own words. >> this country has thought itself as an ethnic melting pot. in too many ways, essentially of cowards. they say when we go low, they go higher. no. no. they go low, we kick them. i listen to these things, let's make america great again. when did you think exactly america was great? >> sean: when we go low, we kicked them. like a nation of cowards.

like i have been telling you, every democrat, they accuse trump and guilty of what it is they accuse the president of. what they are caught doing. every he ran political interference for obama and brag about it. and he continues to fuel the fuel divisive rhetoric. we kick them. is that a threat? now, attorney general bill barr, he's actually the one whose holding those who abuse power accountable. he's draining the swamp. he's trying to literally weed out the dirty cops who abuse their power and have free reign during the obama years. weaponizing intelligence against political opponents. facts? they no longer matter to the left. truth doesn't matter. reason, common sense doesn't matter. it's all trump derangement syndrome every second, our, 24-hour day, levels are shocking and disturbing. look at this, ahead of tonight's appearance, look at governor mike huckabee. he's got a great sense of humor. he posted this on twitter. i will be on sean hannity

tonight and will it's plain how president trump will be eligible to a third term due to the illegal attempts by comey, dems, and the media attempting to oust him, that's why i was named to head up to 2020 for reelection. liberals on twitter had a full now, on meltdown over a joke. look at susan rice tweeting out, wtf." i tweeted out, it's like alka-seltzer and water. the bubble and fizz. what's the name of don jr.'s book? oh, yeah, that's right, they are triggered. mike huckabee alongside the author of the best seller "witch hunts," fox news legal analyst jeff jarrett. governor, it's an obvious joke. and -- i'm reading the comments and i'm dying. >> it wasn't a joke, sean. i'm serious. >> sean: you been appointed?

speak of the president is going to get a third term because the first one didn't count because he was so mistreated by congress and the press. this is hilarious. by the way, wtf means well, that's fine accordingly. >> sean: maybe in arkansas. but in new york it means something different. >> it's hilarious and i had a lot of fun watching people on the left just have their heads explode. some of them were never trumpers, they'd went crazy. you have the media types. but honestly, the fact that susan rice took the bait? i've got to be honest. that was funny. i've had a fun day. >> i will be honest. because they are so psychotic, this has gone on for three years. at this point, it has no real impact. it's, like, whether it's, you know, a tree falls in the forest, nobody is there. they are like, okay, they wake up and they hate trump. now we are going to hate him this way. one conspiracy theory, we don't

admit we got it wrong, move on to the next light. -- lies. >> eric holder, bless his heart, nobody takes him seriously. his record as ag was abysmal. he turned the department of justice into a political organization for barack obama. so to accuse bill barr of partisanship? that is rich. let me point something else to you. when he was held in contempt of congress for defying a subpoena, he rushed to the white house to hide behind barack obama begging for executive privilege. and obama did it. but nobody accused obama of obstruction of congress and impeachable offense. but donald trump invokes the same, executive privilege in response to congressional subpoena, it's obstruction of congress, impeachable offense. it's rank hypocrisy and stupidity.

but democrats in congress are excellent at that. >> sean: last word, governor huckabee. where does this end? i would just say to accuse bill barr to be unfair and go out there and protect the president, anybody who knows him knows that he's just a protectionist of the law. he loves the constitution. he's not a trump guy as much as he is a constitution and law guy. good for him. for eric holder to say what he did, it's nonsense. it's like asking jeffrey dahmer to teach is nutrition. table manners and nutrition. just simply does not fly. >> sean: thank you. author of "the new york times" best seller, "freedom of the press." as you know, i call him the great one. he hosts "life, liberty, levin." 8:00 p.m. sunday night right here on fox news channel and also syndicated radio host, this send a he has a very special

guest, me, for the full hour. great one, there's a lot of seriousness here. when we get to the heart of this, this is your wheelhouse. our framers and founders never imagined this. this is about the constitution. >> let's take a look at this. first of all, let's take a look at the committee chairman. what do they have in common clicks make a lot of things but they talk about the rule of law. they come from sanctuary cities sanctuary cities that nullify a federal law and the support that. they obstruct ice and law enforcement. they reject the immigration laws and they are talking about the rule of law. they do not believe in the rule of law. the constitution is the law of the land. not these that run these committees. they are not nancy pelosi. it's the president's duty to uphold the constitution, not the rogue house with the democrats in control. literally every president who crosses the house represented it was in the future under the

standard list procedures they have in place with abuse of power and obstruction of congress is subject to potential impeachment if they do not bow to the will of the majority of the house of representatives. first of all, obstruction of congress, they say, right? has the senate done anything yet? so how is it obstruction of congress? it's obstruction of a rogue faction of radical democrats of the house of represented in spirit when they won the majority, they ran for impeachment. the president of the united states has no obligation to them. abuse of power, they talk about. when the president of united states like every past president even since george washington has fought to protect the office of the presidency against a congress that is out of control, that demands the innermost information from his innermost witnesses, individuals who report to him. he goes to court and they say that's obstruction. let me tell you something: every past president who will be

subject to impeachment under the current articles being debated under the house of representatives, john adams would be impeached. he shut down newspapers and imprisoned reporters but abraham lincoln would be impeached. he shut down 300 newspapers. he imprisoned reporters. thomas jefferson would be impeached. the louisiana purchase without budget approval from the congress. woodrow wilson would be impeached. he re-segregated the civil service and he put political opponents and reporters in prison. he would be impeached. the great fdr would be impeached. internment of japanese americans, italian-americans. german-americans. took the property, took their homes. use of the internal revenue service against the "philadelphia inquirer" owner against the connect used the irs against political opponents like you belong. fdr would be impeached 25 times. john kennedy would be impeached, used in the irs and fbi against his opponents, leaked

information against them. lyndon johnson would be impeached, used the irs, the fbi, and the cia, to protect and tap into his belittle opponents into civil rights leaders. by the way, became a multimillionaire while he was a senator. we have a lot of impeachment going on under these bogus rules that this rogue house democrat leadership has put in place. let's look at the history of the democrat party. it's an ugly history with some gaps of goodness. the party of slavery. the party of segregation. the party of jim crow. and when the democrat party does what it does like that, it needs to be slammed down. and it needs to be slammed down now! the next democrat president of the united states must be impeached. not to get even, not because we are at a low level. but because the republicans can't live under one constitution when the democrats

live under another constitution. it's the only way we are going to stop them. one party cannot be allowed to abuse the constitution, wave it around, while the other party since there and takes it. the democrat party must be slapped down. -- slammed down. the next democratic president, if they vote for impeachment for donald trump, must be impeached and we have the blueprint. it's the pelosi project. she said it today, we've been at it for 22 months, two years. what you mean we are being fast here? we have the plan. endless unconstitutional subpoenas. no resort to judicial review. no due process. accusers protected from scrutiny accusers protected from scrutiny hone calls upon leaders must be released. the president's closest advisors must testify. tax returns. business records.

business associates! all subject to congressional access and demand the appointment of a special counsel. that's the pelosi project. it must become the republican project when there is a democrat president. one other thing. look at this damn thing. this is the mueller report. it took them 500 pages to say that the president of united states is an innocent man who did not commit any crimes. 500 pages, $40 million. two and a half years. that's that. another one that's 500 pages long. look at this. what is this? this is an inspector general report that says, what, the obama administration -- are you listening, mr. holder, spied on the trump campaign! tampering with evidence! repeatedly lied to the fisa report to get bogus warrants four times renewed! used a dossier paid for by the clinton campaign. and the dnc that they knew was bogus and that

they use all of this, lies and crimes to get this! a special counsel report that says you are president of the united states is an innocent man. donald trump is upholding the constitution. donald trump is the victim! it's the members of the house of representatives, the democrats! they are the ones who need to be impeached! that's it. >> sean: great one, thank you. "life, liberty, levin," i will be mark's guest. sunday night, 8:00 right here on fox. i hope you watch. i have questions for james comey and i'm going to lay them out. that straight ahead. ♪

>> sean: the revealing stunning horwitz report, cemented james comey's legacy of failure. we now know with certainty,

comey lied a lot about fisa abuse claiming, that's a bunch of nonsense, claiming that the dossier did not form the basis for the warrant against carter page, 1-2 step into all world trump. still has a lot of questions to answer, questions that would expose him as overseeing a derelict, amounting to an upper echelon of corrupt fbi so-called leaders. for example, how does jim comey, how do you justify signing a warrant that how do you justify in this whole process doctoring key materials, still using it to keep in the phony investigation going? verified. remember, you signed a three of them. how do you justify and proudly proclaim your vindication when you look at 15 failures, inaccuracies, and

failures relating to this warrant? how do you justify signing a warrant when the materials, the vast majority of information in the application is unverifiable? there is no so-called evidence. how do you justify, then use the clinton dirty russian dossier she paid for as a central and essential part of a fisa application. you didn't have the dirty dossier, you weren't getting the fisa warrant. how do you justify renewing the fisa warrant, still no verifiable information and the available information corrected? how do you justify in between finding one, two, three, you tell trump it's unverified but salacious. by the way, can we get a straight answer? when did you first learn about the dossier? did you ever take any steps at

all to verify the dossier? it seems you did nothing. do you still believe as you've been telling us, that dirty clinton bought and paid for russian dossier had credible intelligence in? if you do, you're the only one believing your own lies. we know the fbi, we know you relied on the dirty clinton bought and paid for dossier to get the warrant to spy on carter so you can 1-2 step into the trump campaign transition and deep into his presidency. when everything suggested the opposite. you have lied repeatedly. will you ever admit that the fisa process was abused and you abused it. it all happened on your watch. how did the steele dossier wind up in the intelligence committee? assessment, can you tell us that? did you talk to brennan? did you talk to clapper? and by the way, what were the nature of those conversations? i'd also like to know what did barack obama know?

what did joe biden though? what did susan rice know or what they did any other top official in the obama administration? what did they know? that they hide exculpatory evidence and use unverifiable evidence with the fisa court application spying on americans? and this wrapping abuse and illegal surveillance, it all happened on your watch. you act like you've done nothing wrong. why do you refuse to take responsibility? by the way, a lot of people that lack of candor like horwitz say that you did, they light a course and go to jail all the time. why do you get a special pass, get out of jail free card? day of reckoning is coming, mr. comey. i've been warning you. you have the right to remain silent. i suggest you use it. joining us, dan bongino, sara carter, jason chaffetz. jason, i say i would not want to be james comey's lawyer today. >> that's a good question. i would add a few did that.

i would ask, where would people go to get a refund on that book? i'd also like to know when he said he doesn't do sneaky things, he doesn't leak, he doesn't do weasel moves. how can he justify that? i want to know how he handpicked to the team, the same people who worked on the clinton email team, they are 110,000 people at the department of justice. how come he handpicked those people to work on this for trump? he's so dirty, this guy. i hope he ends up in handcuffs. >> sean: sarah, i will let you go next but let me tell you something, this is even worse than we thought. the level of deception and lying, just outright lie to the country. no, this is -- that never happened. he's lying through his teeth. then he goes and tells trump something totally different. >> that's right. even when they are caught, they don't admit to the truth. this is not the first time and

remember, this is the same james comey with robert mueller accused stephen hatfield in the anthrax case. they accused an innocent man, went before a judge and said i'm absolutely certain that this is the guy. absolutely certain this is the guy. it wasn't the guy. this is the same man who told roberto gonzalez and made a big speech about how he rushed to the hospital -- higher loyalty. >> that he was going to save america from this unwarranted surveillance. guess what happened? he did the same thing but worse to carter page. >> sean: dan, only for the constraints of time. >> sean, listen for the most devastating jim comey take away, no later than january of 2017, jim comey's fbi those with absolute certainty that christopher steele's dossier sources are bogus because they talk to the sub sources who tell him this information is garbage. it's beer talk. comey's fbi authorizes the spying on an innocent american citizen three more times.

not only that, the seven misstatements in the initial fisa? they add in those lies and they add to ten more allies in three renewals! knowing it is all bogus. >> sean: i'm hoping at this point, we have a real criminal investigation with serious people. that would be barn door. when we come back, you will not believe what's happening on capitol hill right now next. when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free.

♪ >> this is not from stock footage, not library stuff. the house judiciary committee could vote on articles of impeachment before the night is

>> sean: continues on capitol hill tonight, nadler and company and thusly debate the bogus fact free articles of impeachment. this is a national embarrassment. they are hurting this case for their kids and grandkids. this madness has to stop. you have the power. we help you set your dvr. never miss an episode and will never be the media mob and let not your heart be troubled. see you tomorrow. >> laura:dv a i'm laura ingraham and this is the "ingraham angle." back in washington tonight. now before we begin this analysis of this farce of impeachment -- i'm coughing because i can't believe it's still going on in capitol hill. it's going until four in the morning, another event that shows the enduring power of the movement donald trump created. economic nationalism. sovereignty. independence from international bureaucracies. and controlling one's destiny. that movement is sweeping through the u.k. tonight. where the anti-brexit labour party is resounding defeat in parliamentary elections making