rage, psychotic hate trump media. let not your hearts be troubled. don't forget hannity.com and set your dvr. let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham starts right now. >> laura: i'm laura ingraham and this is "hannity" from another insane washington tonight. the democrats week impeachment case was exposed today as the congressional rules committee said it to the full house. senate and judiciary members jim jordan, clinton and buck are here to respond. and senators are saying, this is my favorite moment of the day, that mitch mcconnell should recuse himself ahead of the senate trial, oh, anything else, alan dershowitz has something to say about that. plus the impeachment published is now losing the support of...

wait for it, democrats. the ingram holsters and mclaughlin tell us why. and also tonight and this is stunning, the court that signed off on all of those bogus buys and warrants just dropped a rare review of the fbi in jim comey, sara carter, matt schlapp all here to respond. but first, pelosi's three ring slot. that is the focus of tonight's many "angle." all right, this impeachment shuffle, i was thinking about it literally on the drive to the studio tonight. it has all of the feel of like a second rate traveling circus that camps out in the old fairgrounds of your town, but then it never leaves. you have the jugglers, the pass fake jugglers, kind of uneasy tightrope walkers. >> i'm going to reserve any kind of public judgment.

>> i think it is important we reserve judgment. >> have you made up your mind? >> and keeping to the facts. ♪ >> laura: wait, he's about to fall. and of course, you have to have the sward swallow her. >> it may be that voters decide in 2020 they don't want me as a representative but i don't know mike i hope that's not the case, i really do and i hope that if people don't agree with my decision, they see i base my decision on personal integrity. ♪ >> laura: he's got a sword appeared the flames were coming out of her mouth there. did you see that question with that was wild. then you have the ringmaster. last week, well, she pulled her to. >> i, myself, am not a lawyer. sometimes i act like one, not as often as i act like a doctor. i practice medicine on the side.

>> laura: i need a total translation of that. in this way, that ringmaster has been replaced by a new one. someone who i don't think he could sell a water cooler in the desert. >> the american people will be watching. they will be watching. who is going for an open and fair trial? who is providing facts, relevant facts, media facts? who is for covering up? >> laura: no one is coming into the tent. he's trying to get people to come on, it will be really cool when you come inside, $0.50, anything? and some of the newest acts, they clearly aren't ready for the big time. take jamie raskin. >> president saul alinsky, and the official will tell you theyt shaken down? >> there is lots of evidence. >> i never spoke to them. >> is there any statement on the record? speak with the last

administration for four years didn't provide any military assistance to ukraine. i did a 55 day with some how life and death in the situation, during a period of transition of one government to another. you know, it is just pretty thin rules to impeach a president of the united states on. >> laura: he kept going over to the side of the classes. but for his part this in a team majority leader mitch mcconnell wants to revoke all the permits and shut down the big top flop. >> the senator is meant with a judge and jury to hear a trail and not to re-rent the entire investigation because angry partisans rushed sloppily through it. the trajectory that the democratic leader apparently wants to take us down before he's even heard opening arguments could set a nightmarish precedents for our

institution. >> laura: well, after weeks of the democrats she bow production, americans are desperate for the show to just be over. heck the production is so bad to come i would not be surprised if we had a full-fledged stampede on our hands. well come away from the abuse of spectacle and towards the g.o.p. and that is the many "angle." now with me three congressmen on the house judiciary committee, jim jordan, tom mcclintock. the articles expected to hit the floor tomorrow. what can republicans do now? >> we continue to point out the truth and all the facts around the president side. they've always been on the president side and the democrats had to resort to this unfair process they conducted in the house. no subpoenas and no witnesses indicted for the hearings and the depositions. adam schiff prevented witnesses and all the democratic questions got answered and of course adam schiff told us the whistle-blower would testify until we'll discover, wait a minute, adam schiff staff so

then he wasn't going to testify. now they are talking about process concern in the senate after the democrats did through this entire three months which is kind of laughable. and i think you're "angle" was right on this. >> laura: it just came to me in the car. you always say a circus but it truly is a circus, but it's one of those lame kind that didn't have a lot of money. they kind of broke down with an old elephant. we have those in our town, just like, can we get the real circus question work if we want to see a circus, can we see a good circus? senator mcclintock might think nancy pelosi forgot was against doing this but i know she won't say it and she's wishing they wouldn't walk on the edge of this branch and they are about to sow it off. >> i can't read minds but what the air force calls target fixation where the airport gets fixated on the target and hit ends up crashing into a mountain. that is where the democrats or. they are crashing the country.

these are a travesty. by the way i think you owe an apology to american circuses compared to what's going on in that building right now. spoon congressman buck, the president is responding to this impending boat and he did so today with a scathing letter to house speaker nancy pelosi writing "history will judge you harshly if you proceed with this impeachment charade. your legacy will be that of turning the house of representative and revered legislative body into a star chamber of partisan persecutio persecution." well, here is how nancy reacted. your reaction to the president's letter? >> no reaction. foolish. >> no reaction, why not? >> we have been working. i saw the essence of it though and it's clearly sick. >> laura: it's really sick. congressmen. >> what the president did was lay out the procedural flaws in the house process. and i think that if the bar stays this low for future

impeachment, we will have a problem as a country. anytime we have a republican house or a republican house and senate and a democrat president, they will go after the democrat president if this is where the bar is. it shouldn't be here. >> laura: your colleague hastings spent a lot of time pontificating on impeachment today. >> what we have here is a corrupt president that wanted to do something to advance his political circumstances. >> laura: a little interesting, slightly that that congressman back in 1988, mr. mr. hastings was himself impeached when he was a federal judge for bribery and perjury but like the circus, he keeps coming back to town, the same people. he's only one of the eight people ever to be removed from office by a senate impeachment trial. the congressman, you literally can't make this up. that actually isn't lc hastings.

but it is. >> would get stranger and stranger and remember what nancy pelosi when she wants the house representatives she promised in the end it would be bipartisan to move the american people when they actually had the hearings, to their position and in fact, just the opposite has happened, so much so they took the vote and inquiry to coat democrats voted with us and one at the democrats which to become a republican. they have not made a case. when i read the entire letter. it is hard-hitting but a good friend of mine in florida, very politically connected said the president's teaching republicans how to fight. like mitt romney's rules of order. oh, my dear friend from new york, we have to respect you so much but a slight disagreement. you come at him with a club and he will come at you with something bigger and harder. congressman mcclintock, they were hammering this letter. they see this letter and like evelyn woods readers because

they immediately pounce, watch. >> this afternoon he sent a six page, hyperbole filled in a glimpse in the president's mind. this is a tantrum being done on white house letterhead. and senator should read this will be concerned about his mental state. >> the letter is a midnight rant by the president and regrettably, it is filled with lies. >> honestly this is like a letter that he wrote. >> the letter is hard-hitting and pretty darn on pointe almost every point. they are trying to distract from the economy. they hate him, they hate the americans who voted for him. >> i think there is a pretty good reason he was elected and not because he talks in stormy platitudes like elections. what you get with donald trump is a blonde, clear talk of a manhattan businessman. he says what he means any means what he says and a lot of people

found that a plea yelling congressman buck he says that the democrats are interfering with the next election. everything they accuse him of in fact, intolerant, filled with hate, they want to dilute the votes of americans who will turn out to vote for trump. they want to remove that choice from the ballot. >> this is the opening statement that you will see in the senate. the president is laying out for the american people what the american people can expect purity if mitch mcconnell shortens the senate trial, it is unfortunate because the american people are waiting to see the republican narrative. we haven't had that opportunity in the house. >> laura: i ran into louie gohmert and the green room and the moderates want to shut this thing down. my concern as a lawyer is that you never know what you are going to get. you think, it's like, don't dig a hole when you are on top of firm. that is only concerned. i kind of wanted to take it to the wall.

>> we all like to hear from the whistle-blower but mitch mcconnell and the senator's going to do, the facts on the president side. we said this for months now. we had the transcript and a quid pro quo. the two guys, president trump sent no pressure, no linkage, no pushing whatsoever. we have the fact ukraine, it was held up at the time and almost importantly the ukrainians did nothing to get the aid itself. so those facts have never changed, will never change. >> laura: they keep saying you never argue the substance. they are like oh, they are not arguing the substance. ken buck, jim jordan and tom mcclintock are talking about substance. >> list talk about substance for a second. if you brought a case to the court, no crimes but ten crimes, crimes are made up, those are the two articles of impeachment from abuse of power and obstruction of congress. those are not crimes, that means he went to the court to defend his constitutional prerogatives, abuse of power means he lawfully exercised his constitutional

powers just in the manner congress -- >> laura: so no crime. >> and present no evidence admissible in court. it is all hearsay or the words gossip. that is what is supporting mike supporting the flimsy case, it made up crimes. >> laura: congressman jordan i hear you are one of the people arguing. >> that is up to the white house and i would be happy but like i said the facts around the president side and i will do anything to help the president. >> laura: the debate will keep going tomorrow? >> six hours of the day. >> laura: all of their stockings. congressman great to see you. thanks for being here tonight. i want to introduce you to larry tribe, harper laud protect -- and the house democrats behind s with the articles of impeachment. he's telling democrats, now that they link to formally impeach trump would invite intervention and set a dangerous precedent another option is vital to consider. voting for articles of impeachment but holding off for

the time being on actually transmitting to the senate. this is a cute trick. always changing it. joining me now alan alan dershowitz, you know him well, author of the book "guilt by accusation." the democrats with a new trick. coming out of the hat this time, it's bribery, extortion, the court documents, not the articles but now, it will have it in our back pocket and we won't put the cards on the table. what about that? >> i can't imagine anything more unconstitutional or any great deprivation of civil liberties than to congress to impeach a president, to accuse him and then not bring him to trial. it is the same thing. you accuse him. you know what it would be like,

indicted somebody and said to come i'm not bringing you to trial. you are indicted. you stand indicted, but you have no opportunity to prove innocence. back in the as they did richard nixon, the criminal case come i was in and i objected. in nixon's behalf. and is the acc you get involved on nixon's behalf to make sure his rights were not violated. this impeachment is tearing the country apart and my friend and colleague larry tribe's idea will tear the country apart even more because it would accuse somebody formally without giving him an opportunity to be

vindicated and acquitted. hamilton and madison would be turning over in their graves at larry tribe suggestion. >> laura: they are frantically, the democrats sleeping with the holograms of the founders. the founders are mentioning every five seconds by these folks, alan, senator brown, and this is an amazing interview today. i have to say i watched it. said this about mcconnell today. >> will not easily shocked by mitch mcconnell. he doesn't have respect for the institution although you would think the majority leader of the u.s. senate would, but there is increasing talk he should recuse himself from this trial when we are supposed to sit there and judge the evidence. >> laura: in other words, senator mcconnell is saying this thing is bunk and we are not voting for it. so he's not impartial, alan. so he has to recuse himself now. >> i was involved in the clinton impeachment, of course, and the clinton impeachment exactly the

same thing happened. the leaders of the senate, the democratic leads in the senate worked closely with the white house. i know, i saw it. i was there. and so come if you would have invented a new way of impeachment, it would be great is if it was nonpartisan. if all of the people in the house were to listen to the evidence objectively and all of the people in the senate would listen, but for the democrats after conducting extraordinarily partisan impeachment and suddenly virtuous and the trial itself has to be any involvement cometh mcconnell has to recuse himself, so would adam schiff have to recuse himself and jerry nadler, all of the peopled for impeachment on day one. >> laura: we need her in there for comedy sake. >> you can't have recusal on one side without recuse on the other. this is tearing the country apart and we have to find some way to bring us together when this is finally over. >> laura: this is why we are

here, alan, bringing everyone together. so alan, where it has that you being seriously considered for a role in arguing this case along with the white house counsel, jordan, few others but how would you divide that up? i know you can't say or might not do it but hypothetically speaking, how would this be divided up? >> i can't comment on it obviously. >> laura: hypothetically. >> i would be kind of an amicus curiae friend of the senate, the constitution. i would be arguing not the facts, but the constitutional issues going back to the constitutional convention to "the federalist" papers to point out how the framers did not intend for they are to be partisan impeachment, but intended for specific criteria before they were laid out and not the kind of criteria that have been made up. that would be my role, if it were decided that i would play that role. but i can't comment whether or not i have been asked or whether

i would agree to do that. >> laura: who would have ever would have thought a law professor wouldn't like a hypothetical, but i gave you a hypothetical. alan, thank you so much. it's great to see you tonight. disgraced fbi love your lisa love your lisa page's work she is not political and she is the victim of a right wing smear campaign. so naturally she's giving her first interview to rachel maddow. sara carter, matt schlapp, sound off on that one and a lot more.

♪ there is no one on this set of who has inexperience of counterintelligence who would not have made the exact same decision. this is a question about whether rush is working with the united states to interfere in the elections. we were obligated to figure out with that that was true or not. we were extraordinarily careful not to do anything that would allow this information to get out before we knew what we had. >> laura: of course, that was former fbi lawyer lisa page moments ago showing just how

nonpartisan she has. the first big interview she gave on the russia collusion biggest booster, of course show rachel maddow. she claims to be the victim of right wing smear campaign but her timing is kind of curious. the return to the public eye comes in the wake of the ig report bombshell that laid out the fbi's stunning abuse of power to spy on the trump campaign. joining me now at sara carter, host of the sara carter show and the podcast and fox news contributor matt schlapp chairman of the american conservative union and author and filmmaker, sarah. why is paige puffing up now, and why on rachel maddow? >> lisa page is actually trying to control the narrative now. these aren't stupid people. they have conducted a very stupid action, but that was only because they believe that hillary clinton was going to win the election. they never believed for one

minute while investigating president trump in conducting illegal surveillance of carter page that they would ever be caught. at this point in time, and this is according to my sources that are former fbi, sources with the fbi right now, that the players that are being called out in the ig report or trying to control the narrative. those that haven't come out publicly that is talked about in that report that basically alter documents more misthe fisa court are scrambling now. they are getting attorneys, trying to figure out how they will handle this and believe me, people are throwing people under the bus right now. this is what is happening. so there's a lot of movement. >> this is amazing and math, she talked about the leak text messages. trump likes to say the love bird, watch. >> i know what it looks like when the department is trying to protect people and protect information, and i know what it looks like when they are not. there are plenty of ways to

fulfill congressionally mandated secretarial responsibilities without politicizing the messages and shoveling them out the way they did. my speculation is because this was not a great time for the justice department. >> laura: okay, so they had an insurance policy, and they wanted to make sure potus was kept informed. please don't let this happen, peter. oh, don't worry. >> there is two points, first to show the rachel maddow show is wall to wall with russian collusion. there is literally, they are pushing this. after bob mueller did everything and hired every democrat he could and found no evidence. second of all, on the text messages, the reason why it is important for the american people and the taxpayers to see it, it wasn't about their sexual relationship. it was about to go high-powered fbi officials talking such never trumper trash on the elected president of the united states. that is the part everyone needs to see. a behind the scenes effort as they said, to stop him. and the text proved it.

>> laura: i want to get your action to today stunning and of course sarah alluded to related news, the fisa court. finally, i wondered, the fbi to fix national security wiretap after that ig report. the fisa court judge writing the frequency with with which representation is unsupported or uncontradicted by possession with which they withheld information detrimental to their case. calls into question whether information contained in other fbi applications is reliable. how big of a deal is this and what does it mean for lisa page and all of that tonight? >> first of all these fisa courts rely completely on the files that they have put on their desk. i believe hundreds and hundreds of fisa request and of course, the courts denied none of them, maybe one, maybe two and in the

sense of conducting investigations, hearings, none of that but basically looked at the file and they go, sure. and now they realize they have been lied to. now, the fisa court doesn't focus on the issue of bias, and of course the ig and horowitz, no bias here. i find that amazing conclusion when you have errors, a lot of them and they all fall on the same side. when the tennis ball falls once or twice on this side and once or twice on that side commit is random, incompetent, it could be an accident. but if the tennis ball falls 17 times on the same net, that is prima facie evidence of bias. it is kind of weird to say, they all follow the same direction and yet no advice here. >> laura: blamed the right-wing media. i guess we in the right wing media we wrote those text messages. that was all us. now this is what james comey

said on fox about getting back to dinesh d'souza and his point how hard it was to get a fisa warrant. >> i was overconfident and the procedures the fbi and justice had built over 20 years my thought they were free robust enough and i was overconfident. >> let's put up the graphic, jimmy appeared 1,081 request for surveillance under fisa in 2018. one was withdrawn, one rejected an approval rate of more than... wait for it, 99%, sarah. jim comey how was he ever fbi director from day one? >> day one, that was a critical, critical wish we could do it over moment. >> he signed the fisa. he was responsible. he was the director of the fbi. he knew very well what was going on. he was in close communication with andrew mccabe. we know andrew mccabe had meetings with lisa page as well as peter strzok. they wanted to stop the

president. they wanted to coup the president of the united states. this is what they wanted, and this is what they did. laura, this was not their first rodeo and the fisa court knows that. they knew they had applications in there fudged by the fbi. this was supposed to be there top brass. this was supposed to be there top brass. so how can sba or chris wray chris wray say nobody made a mistake when premier agent made more than 17 errors? >> laura: how does christopher wray say? he's like to stockpile on the fbi. >> it might be unfair to christopher wray and others but a wholesale change who's running the agencies because this is simply corrupt. i want to go back to what dinesh d'souza said. if there was no political bias on spying on team trump why was the team trump only spied on? how many democratic presidential candidates or presidents were spied on?

this is obvious what is happening here when you see the wholesale change in leadership. >> laura: can you imagine what susan writes, samantha powers and ben rhodes would have said if the shoe were on the other foot? can you imagine? they would be chaining themselves to the white house gates. >> we were not even allowed to attack president obama. >> we don't even know who yet who they unmasked. what about the 300 or so unmasking with samantha. >> laura: dinesh, almost out of time but do you think people are going to jail after this horowitz report in your sent home where this is going? >> i sure hope so because look, they have been doing this to us. it is amazing how they get away with it. it seems that there is no accountability. so until we do to them what they have been doing to us, they are never going to stop. i think that is the the principal for the republicans to keep in mind. we have to ultimately do to them

what they have done to us else they will keep saying fine, when the other guy comes in, let's move on. we come in and we resume shenanigans. and so the breakdown instability and rule of law in america, one site is gangster raised and the other side has put up with it. >> laura: okay, thank you so much and great to see you, merry christmas if i don't see you before hand. >> merry christmas. >> laura: the latest impeachment fall has bad news for the democrats and though panel breaks down for significant findings yet. don't go away. is it ok to ask for a bass pro and a cabela's gift card? save big on great gifts during the christmas sale at bass pro shops and cabela's. like redhead men's fleece or flannel-lined jeans for under $30. natural reflections ladies' chenille cardigans for under $24. and bass pro and cabela's gift cards are always a favorite gift. plus thousands more online.

♪ >> there's another peach might pull out and sorry, bad news for the democrats. cnn report shows support for impeachment of five points just since november. but more importantly support among democrats, they see the writing on the wall plummeted from 90% to 77% last month. that finding may be the most significant polling result today on impeachment. here to tell us where that is is conrad's editor at large and trump 2020 campaign poster. scott, let's start with you. that is a pretty significant shift among democrats. what is driving it? >> look i don't like to get hung up on any one poll, but the data are showing clearly republicans have won the impeachment debate. democrats are frustrated because

things aren't going anywhere. we were told a couple of weeks ago that support for impeachment was going to grow. republicans were going to come on board. now the numbers are shifting back the other way. democrats and everybody else is aware that the president will not be removed by the senate. and in fact, probably the most significant finding of all and most significant data of all is not even polled. we are sitting here talking about democrats at risk for their reelection because of voting for impeachment. that is not the way this was supposed to work out. the writing is on the wall. the republicans won the impeachment battle. >> laura: john, that is pretty definitive from my old pal here. but jeff toobin is a revered cnn legal analyst. he has a real problem with this poll, watch. >> i don't believe that poll for one second. 9277%. >> you know, i just don't believe it. it makes no sense that number would change like that. the polls are sometimes wrong.

because that poll is wrong, just as i said, okay? >> laura: trump says the fox poll is bad, but it's not just that poll, scott is making the point. you are interviewing in wisconsin three weeks ago, can we talk about health care? we are sick of this ukraine thing. >> right, those bad media polls are getting bad for them. all of the bulls that came out with her cnn, abc, quinnipiac, they are all for republicans. can you believe they have less than 30% republicans, 33% on election day in 2016. so they can't believe that the polls that they rigged are actually going against them. because after two weeks of hearings, they board the country to death. they came up with no evidence, no proof and all they proved it as donald trump is innocent of everything they are saying. this is a railroad. all politics and the country is

tired of it. they want to move on to other things. we introduce the campaign, trump campaign and reduced a poll in the 30 districts that the democrats hold because one switched. we already got one. because of this. but in that poll, 53% opposed the impeachment and only 43% support and member of congress of every election. so they are big at risk and this is backfiring big time. >> laura: so i think, scott they are here for show can, it is very complicated. a lot of different players. i'm not saying it's not important, but i think a lot of this goes down to what they are seeing now as far as the results of this months and months of discussion of ukraine. trump and these are national polls, not every battleground state, but they are national polls, interesting snapshot, beating every major presidential candidate.

here is the graphic. "usa today," biden is beating bernie sanders, warren, bloomberg, pete buttigieg, some months back that was not the case. trump was losing to pretty much every one of those characters. scott. significant or just a blip? >> i think it suggests all of the trends are moving in the president's direction. things are better for him today than they were a month or so ago, partly because of what we have seen from the democratic presidential debates. partly the economy, partly the impeachment, but you can't get overconfident if you are the president's team if you want the president to win. polls about a general election in december of the preceding year aren't all that predictive. what they are telling us, it's likely to be a close election if nothing changes, likely to be talking late on election night like places like wisconsin and michigan and pennsylvania. and so i don't think either side should feel great about this. right now, compared to a month

or two ago, the president is doing a little better. >> laura: scott come i will take a bit about the late night wisconsin and michigan, okay? we heard that about the parliamentary election in britain last week. it's going to be right down to the wire and boris was popping the champagne at 6:00 a.m. i think you are right, right, john? very positive and let the democrats dissolve themselves. he's made his case, and i think the public has already spoken. >> you are exactly right. we are running behind but in the meantime the one name you forgot from ukraine was biden. biden used to be the front runner. he is now trailing because collateral damage. everybody sees about him and hunter. i tell you what, the only one that might be aware of this is nancy pelosi. watch out, she were to impeach to remove the president and go after mike pence, she becomes president. and when americans figured that outcome of this impeachment is dead, dead on arrival.

>> laura: all right, gentlemen, thank you so much. great to see you both. for two years, we have been beaten over the head about russian election meddling, but how about the homegrown meddling? the media is ignoring? we will bring you the details plus bernie caring with that horrific murder of an 18-year-old college student, tessa majors. stay there.

♪ >> laura>> you have communitiesd to create crime. >> millions they live in constant fear because the president is cracking down on illegal immigration. >> laura: the statement from the gym and the media, they are not just tired but they are

wrong. the rush to impeach president trump and the conspiracy integrity of the 28th 20 election is at stake? the democrats out the state level are doing things now to potentially dilute your vote and disenfranchise millions of americans. new york began handing out driver's license to illegal aliens on monday, take a look at that line. it went on and on. the same day new jersey got the law also. giving that illegal aliens the right to drive. look at this reaction from the supporters and recipients. [cheers and applause] certainly look like they were in the shadows. here with reaction tom homan, tom, jersey licensed illegal aliens and supporters say i guess it will make the roads safer and they will be driving safely and will have to get insurance, et cetera. >> listen, i think there is 12 states now issuing driver's

license. if the president is watching this tonight or administration is watching this we need to take a hard stance now and come fig fight. and in a privilege like a driver's license, you don't get a privilege to someone who is in the country illegally. most of these people getting driver's license had due process and ordered to be removed by a federal judge. so not only here illegally by the federal law but we are going to reboard them with a driver don't make reward them with a driver's license. >> laura: wait a second, adam schiff, maxine waters, nancy pelosi on capitol hill all day long and nobody is above the law tom homan, nobody is above the low. >> nancy pelosi, chuck schumer and the rest of them are illegal aliens above the law. the president announced a nationwide operation for family groups -- >> laura: they freaked out. >> because they are above the law and even the federal judge remove them from the country, they fought laws with congress.

spoon and trumpet supposed to be the toughest guy with illegal immigrants, and you see lines and lines of illegal immigrants in new york. you go on facebook, where is i ice? line up, ice. >> we have to take tougher stances. and i saw the secretary. >> laura: they are not in the shadows. >> we cannot take this lightly. first of all we don't know who these people are. and the fbi with numerous reports, the most vulnerable fraud so these people are representing fraudulent, foreign identification that we don't even know what this is. and new york mp on and commit to share the information with ice, only ice. and suddenly they call immigration and not only that, if ice gets a court order to get the information, three days, you're supposed to notify the subject of the inquiry and ice to let them know you are looking for it. >> it is a direct violation --

>> laura: this administration is falling down in my view on this issue. maybe it is the election, hispanic voters and a lot are supporting trump. i don't think illegal immigrants and american citizens of hispanic descent like this. in el paso we did that big show in el paso and tens of thousands of people lined up one after the other saying coming he's got to be tough on immigration. >> i'm with you 100%. that's the reason i'm here. i hope somebody is watching. and they take action fast. >> laura: this is all the boat, tom homan, thank you so much. another horrific story, the barnard freshmen stabbed to death murdered allegedly by three young teens in new york city. at 13-year-old suspect in court today charged with second-degree murder. a frantic man hung on for another suspect, a 14-year-old who allegedly bolted from the car yesterday on his way to meet with the police. on top of the gruesome details, there was controversy over information released by the nypd

union about what majors was up to the night she was murdered. joining me now former nypd commissioner bernie kerik come i read the story of the night it happened. your heartbreaks. it is horrific at every level but ed mullin's the president of the nypd sergeant benevolent association being accused of victim blaming. reports are the victim was perhaps at some point looking to buy marijuana, but what do you think about all of this? >> listen, i know what mullins and i take him at his word that that is not what he's doing. he is trying to explain or talk about the mayor's policies are not locking people up for marijuana. i know the mayor blasted him, but i also think that is because it mullins and the other units have exposed for anti-cop mayor for somebody that has promoted anti-cop read rick and someone enfolded the thugs. for somebody that has supported groups that have bashed the

police. and so i don't want to get into what mullins said. i think this is a tragedy. it is horrible. it it is reminiscent what is was going on in this city 70s, 80s, 90s where rudy giuliani created amendment -- and all the crime reduction strategies. this is something that we have to look at extremely carefully right now because i think the city is changing. all you have to do is take a walk around the city right now. rapid homelessness, panhandlers. all of the quality of life crimes, quality-of-life issues that we address in the early '90s to reduce crime, they are all back. >> laura: they are coming back. bernie, the report was 13, 14-year-old individuals were just decided they would go rob people in the park. they just made a decision like, let's go. >> listen, according to a number

of reports now, this was not the first one. there were a number of these that happened prior to tessa majors and someone reported, some not reported. they came out after the fact. this is an area that obviously, there needs to be a bigger police presence. there needs to be more security. and this isn't the only place in the city this is happening. there are spikes in the indicators right now. this is something that the police commissioners are looking at, i'm sure. but look, i'm scared to death at the city reported back to where it was prior to 1994. >> laura: bloomberg stop and frisk and that will end up getting people her as well. i want to show this video and we are almost out of time. this nice wielding man was attacking a woman near park avenue today. a friend of mine actually alerted me to this in a video. it was posted on facebook. he was laying around park avenue

today, flashing and laughing at people. we are out of time, bernie but one example of what you're talking about. thank you for sounding the alarm tonight on this anti-cop frederick. bernie, thank you so much. coming up, it is time to answer your questions, ingram's inbox is next you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. - do that are degrading?ideo tapes, film reels, or photos, legacybox professionally converts them to dvds, thumb drive, or the cloud. legacybox is simple and safe, with over half a million satisfied customers. visit legacybox.com today, and get 40% off.

>> laura: time for ingram's inbox. felix is writing in from michigan. "i was a mexican citizen until last year and went through hell

to get my citizenship and now they want to give immigrants license? let them go through the process. i also used to think i was a democrat. not no more." that's all the time we have. keep the emails coming. shannon bream and the fantastic "fox news at night" team. they can all dance. i know personally. >> shannon: please tell me there is nobody of that. >> laura: i won't say anything more. it's between us. >> shannon: thank you so much. we begin with a fox news alert, public order, the presiding judge of a fisa court slamming the fbi call in the troubling. noting that it means information between other applications is also in question. a deadline from the court. the fbi explains how it plans to cl