january 7, neil. >> neil: and on we go. thank you very much. we'll be looking at all of this. not much, in fact, they're racing on it. 12:00 noon tomorrow on fox business. money is the thing, right? >> she car pools on a caterpillar, dana perino, the five. >> by the way, it doesn't really feel like we're being impeached. >> it's because they call it impeachment light. >> they call it impeachment light. it's impeachment light. i don't know about you, but i'm having a good time. it's crazy. >> justin: it is crazy. no surprise the impeachment vote was as lopsided as a chipmunk's

face with a tooth ache. we're force fed any story, it pays to see who's imitating who. and it appears the democrats aced the media and the media to the democrats. a phony rectitude than a celebration. >> hey, everyone. i'm on my way to the united states house floor to impeach president trump. on behalf of my incredible district, 13 district, let's do this. >> article 1 is adopted. >> meanwhile, "the washington post" wishes you a happy im"impeach-mas," isn't that cute. we wonder, how dumb are they? don't they know this isn't a win-win, it's a win-lose-lose, a win for trump and a lose-lose for the media and the democrats.

not only will the senate reject it, trump will turn it to a badge of honor and sell replicas of it on-line. he should. trump turns political and media hate to a burden he shares with you because the media hates you too. meanwhile, thanks to the reckless use, impeachment becomes meaningless. every time one party controls the house, impeachment is a way to cry resist. why not start inauguration. they did. we see them create feelings, narratives from mind reading to smear those outside of their bubble. ask yourself this, why is the press and the democrats happy with the losing proposition? it makes them feel good thinking that you feel bad. but if the democrats in the media want to celebrate, let them. it's like the other make believe wins they savored, conclusion, covington, kavanaugh, after the sugar rush fades, they're in the same place. and while everyone with real jobs and interests goes to work. >> jesse, this is the best year any president has ever had, plus

we get an impeachment. christmas came early. >> and you knew trump would get impeached. he'll get it again in the second term. i think we'll get four impeachments. >> greg: we could, we could do that. depending on what he does, or doesn't do. pelosi is so funny, you know your mother in church when you get scolded for laughing. take this seriously, jimmy. that's what this whole thing is. it hasn't been disciplined or honorable. from the beginning, the secret crazy little sessions they had with schiff going god knows what in the weird little basement. and they had the people they bring up to insult president trump's children, they didn't convince one single republican, not one. it shows you how partisan this whole thing was. permission to make an analogy, greg? >> greg: permission granted. >> justin: they don't have ammunition left. it's like the bad guy in the movie he's firing, firing, then click. >> greg: throws the gun. >> justin: they're out of ammo.

and the good guys, standing over the bad guys saying we're going to finish you off. that's it. they should have saved impeachment for the second term. that's when the real scandals happen anyway. and listen, they've thrown so much out. >> walk: was that a defense. . >> jesse: mueller, impeachment. another dossier. women? it's gotten absurd and the rest of the country knows it. as you've said, in the last couple of month, you had phase i china, nafta. you had blockbuster economic numbers, breaking records. baghdadi is dead. think about it. this guy is having the best fall we've ever seen. the democrats are falling flat on their face. >> juan: is that a defense? >> jesse: pretty airtight.

it's going to be a kavanaugh situation. >> juan: let's leave it alone. i just cede the floor to you. thank you. we appreciate that. but, i do think that somehow to twist this around that this is a win for trump, it's no big deal. it you have to tie yourself in knots. third time in history, not good. nancy pelosi didn't want to do the impeachment. that's a very good speech. >> jesse: she's going to lose. >> juan: she said she felt forced. steny hoyer made a good speech last night on the floor. three times democrats voted not to impeach. it was only when they were forced. >> jesse: they tried four times already. >> juan: they didn't try. >> jesse: you said three. >> juan: they rejected it. they rejected it. >> jesse: approached it four times. >> juan: because he kept getting himself in trouble.

trump says he doesn't feel it today. he doesn't feel like he's being impeached. that says more about his distorted sense of reality than it says about the democrats or the facts. because the reality is plenty of things trump does, i don't like, you know that, but they are not impeachable. when he talks about john dingle going to hell, i just -- i don't like it. not impeachable. >> jesse: you heard that joke before? >> juan: it's not a joke when you go after dead men. dead people. >> jesse: trump doesn't see live, dead, black, white, male, female. we're in the fourth year of this. >> juan: he doesn't see women, no, no, not trump. here's the thing. there is such a thing as abuse of power. there's such a thing as obstructing congress. those are real items, real cases. >> greg: didn't happen. >> juan: that legitimately justify impeachment. >> jesse: juan admitted they tried to impeach him four times. we got that out of him. dana? >> dana: go back to rashida

talib, she's a congresswoman at michigan started off her congressional tenure as a freshman that won in 2018 by saying we're going to impeach the -- bad word. >> greg: say it! >> dana: oh, no. told me to jump off of the bridge. >> greg: rimes with brother trucker. >> dana: it's the political savviness of someone like an slotkin. she's also a freshman democrat. she's one none of the districts that trump won in 2016, a former cia officer. a different type of person than talib because she knew that if she votes for impeachment, it's likely she's going to lose in 2020. but she decided this is what i'm going to do. i'm voting my conscious. let the chips fall where they may. the difference is, if someone like talib who's going to win in her district -- maybe not her, but most of these democrats are going to win no matter what. it doesn't matter. they're being a bad team player. if they think they need the

majority to hold president trump in check, they might have written themselves off in 2020 and put their majority at risk. for the benefit of someone like a talib and not someone like an slotkin who might lose. >> greg: interesting. emily, bring it home with some incredible analytical insight. >> emily: i think the media celebration and the left celebration is sickening to me. it's not like we didn't know. but it rendered everything transparent. so after the impeachment debates, did you see tom nichols' tweet. he calls it the rump party. the gop is fast on the way to becoming the rump party to the south in the mountains to which jennifer ruben replied, and noncollege educated. it's so offensive and alienating and elitist that drips out of the left in the main stream media. that's exactly why, as we always say, people continue to support trump, because of that feeling from them. and the notion that it's only the college educated that are allowed to participate in these

proceedings and otherwise you don't understand. and to kind of attach yourself to that fairness idea -- so gross. and the smugness, too, the talib, we're going to impeach -- i have never felt smug at a sentencing. i have never felt smug or celebrated when i was sitting in prison no matter what kind of monster i was sitting across from, with a few exceptions. it is always a really grave thing. and so all of that to me belies the obvious. final point, remember, she's the one that utilized her grandmother, right, as a token of political issue and at the end of the day we see right through her. >> greg: you have never not felt smug. >> jesse: it's written all over my face. >> dana: he's got a smug mug. >> greg: that's good. aft racing to impeach trump, nancy pelosi is pumping the brakes on sending the articles to the senate. that's next. we made usaa insurance for members like kate.

a former army medic, made of the flexibility to handle whatever monday has in store and tackle four things at once. so when her car got hit, she didn't worry. she simply filed a claim on her usaa app and said... i got this. usaa insurance is made the way kate needs it - easy. she can even pick her payment plan so it's easy on her budget and her life. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa i've always loved and i'm still going for my best, even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'll go for that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. what's next? sharing my roots. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding.

don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. eliquis, the number one cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. ask your doctor if eliquis is what's next for you. in connemara. right! connemara it is! there's one gift the whole family can share this holiday season, their story. give the gift of discovery, with an ancestrydna kit.

in america, the zip code you're born in can determine your future. the y helps fill the opportunity gap with education programs for all. for a better us, donate to your local y today.

for a better us, what are you doing back there, junior? since we're obviously lost, i'm rescheduling my xfinity customer service appointment. ah, relax. i got this. which gps are you using anyway? a little something called instinct. been using it for years. yeah, that's what i'm afraid of. he knows exactly where we're going. my whole body is a compass. oh boy... the my account app makes today's xfinity customer service simple, easy, awesome. not my thing.

>> jesse: the democrat impeachment sham is getting more outrageous. it was supposed to be quick, now nancy pelosi is dragging her feet by waiting to send the articles of impeachment to the senate. pelosi melting down after being called out. >> frankly, i don't care what the republicans say. i said this is it. any other questions -- on mexico free trade agreement? anybody care about that? >> jesse: she just impeached the president. doesn't want to talk about it. the president responding to impeachment. >> they're playing game, don't want to put in their article, the ridiculous, phony, fraudulent articles. and i think they're not allowed

to do that. here it's unconstitutional, a lot of other thing, but they don't want to put him in because they're ashamed of them. >> and republicans are mocking pelosi. >> speaker pelosi showing they're too afraid to send their shoddy work product to the senate. they could not wait for due process but now they're content to sit on their hands. >> now we have the speaker of the house who's so embarrassed she admits the failure of the impeachment that she will not even send it to the senate. >> jesse: try to convince me this is some sort of brilliant tactical move? i don't see it. i don't see how she has leverage, power, i don't see how holding him back gives her anything, results in anything. explain it to me. >> you think trump wants impeachment hanging around over his head. >> jesse: over his head? he's going to get acquitted. who cares? >> juan: that's what your

assumption is. i see. that's what you saw was total spin coming from >> jesse: what's the point. >> juan: the point is right now mcconnell says this is the political proceedings. he's 100% right. he prejudged it. lindsay graham doesn't want to see any evidence. they don't want witnesses. charles schumer, the majority leader in the senate said he would like to have people come forward with firsthand knowledge. >> jesse: who cares. they investigate in the house and the senate judges. isn't that how it works. >> juan: the senate can set its own terms. they're going to have john roberts, the supreme court chief justice there. >> jesse: schumer doesn't control the senate. >> juan: i agree. republicans. democrats control the house, republicans -- but there is a requirement, i think, that you have some sense of fairness and honesty. >> jesse: there wasn't fairness in the house, juan. juan can't explain why it's a brilliant strategy. why? because they're going to keep

them in nancy's pocketbook for the rest of the year? >> greg: i think the idea -- we dismissed the idea of we demand more witnesses. if your case is so strong, why you demanding more witnesses? and why wouldn't you capitalize on the momentum of the great achievement? why? the momentum is going in reverse. they know that. that's why -- that's why trump is -- he's in an unusually good mood in this whole thing because only his numbers keep going up. so what this is. what they're trying to say now is we need to dig up more stuff. impeach now, find the crime later. if you talk about fairness, no one listens. it was never fair. you guys started the day he was inaugurated. you've always been saying impeach, impeach, you mentioned four times already. >> juan: i said they said there were some people who raised this and they said no to it. >> greg: impeach now, find the crime later.

>> juan: let me respond to greg on this. i say you say rush, rush, rush. remember john bolton, not only john bolton, but mack mull va nooe, all the guys have firsthand knowledge but trump said don't testify, send it to the courts. so maybe nancy pelosi should hold on and say -- >> greg: the case is too strong, you don't need witnesses. that's what i heard. >> juan: that's why we have an obstruction article of impeachment. >> greg: it's not obstruction. >> juan: nancy is going to go to court? you're erasing your articles as we speak. let's talk about -- is this pr? because she obviously wants him to be impeached. but she doesn't want him to be acquitted. and that's the problem she faces. >> emily: this is another reason why this is so preposterous and transparent. everybody sees through this game. it's gamesmanship. it's not actually seeking justice. we're talking about fairness, how is it fair to hold on to these articles. it's literally in the

constitution, the sixth amendment, you have the right to a speedy trial. this is not a criminal defendant, but why as we hold as a procedural matter that it's so fundamental that it processed quickly and efficiently and she decides to hang on to it. her baton should pass now to the chief justice. we heard majority whip today said give him a fair trial and hang him. nothing about that indicates there's an actual commitment to fairness. if so, too, then that testimony would have been so crucial. then, yes, we would have waited for the court's decision. >> and we would have been slow walked forever. >> emily: the evidence would have been -- >> jesse: one of the reasons the democrats said they had to do it was trump was an imminent threat to the democracy and the upcoming 2020 election. what happened to the urgent threat? >> dana: preimpeachment. permission to make a sports

analogy? >> greg: granted. >> dana: nancy pelosi, the speaker of the house, she's really smart, she's really strategic. and i feel like, am i missing something? because it does seem like she's fumbled on the 1-yard line. that's my only -- >> greg: that was your analogy. >> jesse: i thought it was good. >> dana: i have another point to make. they're telling the members it's a consolation prize on the democratic side is now we get to go to 2020 and we will always be able to say that donald trump was impeached. that's what they wanted. they wanted to have that in the ads, they want him to be labeled that way. and they watered down the two articles so much that abuse of power could be -- every american thinks that every president abuses their power. because we're americans, we don't trust the power. >> jesse: if trump starts to sell merchandise, the best president ever and impeached. >> juan: already doing that.

with regard to pelosi, you say, oh, the democrats, they're not doing anything. but look at the mexican trade deal, it went through, right? look at the deal in terms of the budget. >> dana: she fumbled on the 1-yard line. and president trump grabbed the ball and ran it back 9 yards for a touchdown. >> jesse: let her win one. >> juan: the democrats, the moderates, they're going to have trouble. all of the moderates, they got onboard. who's leaving? mark meadows? and -- >> greg: and a new jersey democrat. from >> juan: justin amash. >> greg: a bipartisan vote against impeachment. technically, it was. coming up, the doj and the ig destroys the fbi over fisa abuses and refuses to rule out political bias. details ahead.

do you have concerns about mild memory loss related to aging? prevagen is the number one pharmacist-recommended memory support brand.

you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.

♪

>> greg: we'll talk about it. >> dana: more alarming fallout in the fisa scandal, blasting the fbi over the botched handling of the trump russia probe. first, ag barr calling out james comey. >> he said i was seven steps removed from what was going on. the director doesn't get involve in these types of thing, the

investigation, do you believe that? >> no, i think that one of the problems with what happened was precisely that they pulled the investigation up to the executive floors and it was run and bird dogged by a very small group of very high level officials and the idea that this was seven layers below him is simply not true. >> dana: you can watch more of that interview with the attorney general tonight on "the story" and michael horowitz with explosive testimony yesterday. >> could you say the opposite that actually in this instance there was evidence of political bias and evidence of record changing that looks like malfeasance. >> evidence of both. i agree with you. and in both of these investigations, you found political bias? >> we found through the text messages evidence of people's political bias, correct. >> dana: mm-hmm. jesse, what are your thoughts on the bias. the evidence of bias in the process. and if you can talk about it, the lisa page's insurance policy

explanation she gave about it -- oh, that was an analogy. >> jesse: i have also have a sports analogy. i would say this. james comey botches two bigtime investigations, the trump investigation and the hillary clinton investigation. that would be like the umpire blowing two world series, costing the yankees both world series against the red sox. all of the calls go against the new york yankees, then all of the umpire's crew has the cell phones out and they all say, i hate the yankees, i will do whatever i can do to stop the yankees from winning, and then you say, ump, you guys biassed? how dare you challenge our integrity. it doesn't add up. these are not sloppy mistakes. this is intentional misconduct. you don't happen to forge a document, accidentally conceal information from a judge. you intentionally deceive a

judge in order to spy on a campaign. it's so clear. look at some of the text messages. trump is never going to become president, right? no, he's not. we'll stop it. potus -- barack obama wants to know everything we're doing. quote, the white house is running this. look at that and then look at the results and then the bias screams in your face. now, durham is looking at how all of this thing started. he's looking at whether it was started by pap cop louse or an excuse to ramp up an investigation already started. who started the russian conclusion rumor. what was the bias at the fisa level and he's looking at the cia, the doj, the nsa, the dod, i can keep going. >> juan: yeah, the nba, the nfl. >> jesse: and he's looking at it all to say this thing is finished, it's not finished until durham says it's finished. he's a man of integrity.

the democrats confirmed him and he worked for a democratic president. >> juan: you said oh, the horowitz report is coming and going to blow it out of the water. >> jesse: it did. >> juan: it did not. do you think that horowitz's report is good or bad. here is why i ask that question. >> jesse: horrible. >> juan: you like the part where horowitz goes after the fbi and says mistakes were made. they were made. but you don't like the part where he says, you know what, no political bias in terms of the origins of the report or even the mistakes. >> jesse: he said he couldn't find evidence of political bias. because when he asks someone, are you politically biassed, they say no. >> juan: that's not true. >> jesse: that's true, juan. >> juan: he said, for example, with regard to the e-mails you were talking about, people have personal opinions, but they did not either make the decision or exhibit it in their conduct of their probe. >> jesse: flipping a cowboy 20 times and each time it lands on

heads. you don't make the same mistakes over and over again and have it not be rigged. you know it's rigged. >> juan: you can't pick or choose. you can't say good or bad. you can't have part of it. >> jesse: the report says it was crooked from the jump. you know it. you read it. you know it. >> juan: nobody -- >> jesse: he couldn't find bias. if you don't see bias in what they did in the trump campaign, you're willfully blind. >> juan: trump's coat is blinding him. >> jesse: my future is so bright, i need shades. >> dana: that's a great phase. >> emily: even the fisa court came out publicly and said because of impeachment, this hearing yesterday which is pretty interesting in its own right was overshadowed. at the end of the day, the fisa court, a secret court, they never say anything. they issued a letter saying we're furious at the fbi. they're demanding a response by january 10 because they were lied to. that's what this report says.

the horowitz report says that they were lied to. so how can they do their job and protect all of us? remember, americans pay for the intelligence, all of the technology that is used to help protect us from possible threats that are being coordinated overseas. that's why you have a foreign intelligence surveillance court in the first place. if that is ruined because of political bias or incompetence, whatever it is, the fbi has a lot to answer for. chris ray ought to give a public speech and press conference about it. >> emily: in 2003, the senate oversight committee investigated the fisa report and said they had a culture of not accepting criticism, ie, what ag barr said, and also, 99% of the applications are approved in contrast to what comey said, oh, it's a hard bar to cross.

what are your thoughts? >> greg: i have no thoughts, emily. 17 errors all in one direction. it's bias but not the kind of bias we're used to. we're used to political bias or left versus right bias. this is a confirmation bias issue. whether it's a social worker or a discrimination attorney or a hate crime investigator, finding something means work to do. and so that defines your job. so you're -- you see what you want to see. for example, may i use an analogy? >> dana: yes, please. >> greg: if you have back pain, you go to a massage therapist or chiropractor, the back pain went away, all of them will believe it's because of them. but the back pain just went away. it's people by the job they do believe they're doing the right thing. that's why i'm not to -- this is biassed. they hated trump. they wanted him out. they thought he was a threat. so that -- that bias confirmed all of these mistakes.

so, i think that's fair. >> it's kind of strange that the oh be a ma white house, though, doesn't get more attention. -- the obama white house, though, doesn't get more attention. >> that's crazy. he should be impeached. >> a retroactive impeachment. >> greg: and find that birth certificate, while you're at it. >> jesse: working on the birth certificate. >> dana: i will save us. always listening to your conversations, hopefully it's not this one. now they want to break up christmas. more on that ahead.

>> big tech taking over our lives. amazon's virtual assistant, alexa, set to roll out a feature for the holidays. if the debate gets too heated, you can get alexa change the

subject. face-to-face interaction, that's disappearing. withe spend more time having digital conversations than talking to each other in person. greg? >> greg: my sister told me an amazing story about the disconnect between digital conversation and face-to-face interaction. so she works out in the -- out west. she was at a party. and there were a bunch of people there. and two guys nearly get in the -- they get face-to-face in a savage fight. they're going to -- they're getting to fist acuffs. they had to be separated. they had never met each other before. and when they get them apart, they had been communicating every single davey yeah e-mail at the company. and very congenial and had no idea who they were at the party. they almost kicked each other's butts because they have always been talking digitally and never ever met each other. i thought it was a perfect example of how -- normally, though, on digital, you're more rude. they didn't even know each

other. that was amazing. >> dana: they got into a fight over something else because they were friends over e-mail. >> greg: they didn't know they were those people. isn't that creepy? it's like the sixth sense. like that movie. >> dana: i see dead people. >> juan: they didn't know each other, so what? >> greg: it's like you and me communicating by e-mail every day. right? and we're over at a bar and we don't know each other. >> juan: okay. >> greg: and i say something rude to you. you say who the hell are you. >> juan: it would have moderated. >> greg: it escalated into a fight because they didn't know who they were. what's wrong? why are you laughing? >> juan: dana, what about this idea that alexa -- alexa can help to resolve family arguments? >> dana: i don't want alexa listening. i don't want anybody involved in my family. and then i thought, well, maybe some families need this. so why do i care. knock yourself out if you want to have an alexa. that's good. i mean, i think this is the end of the decade.

everything in the world is better. the fact that we're talking less is probably good. >> juan: do you think we could do better by not texting but actually face-to-face. >> greg: i like talking face-the-face. you can read people. i know when someone's uncomfortable when i'm talking to them. i can see them wincing, smiling, responding. i don't know how my material is doing over text. i can't tell if an lol actually means lol. >> dana: texted me? >> greg: i need to hear the l. yeah, by accident last week. >> dana: yes. shall i tell it? >> greg: you tell it? >> dana: i can tell it. you're okay? >> greg: sure. >> dana: so i was looking through stuff. i heard something about a great santa event that is being held downtown. you have to buy tickets. it's fun for kids. and it's near jesse's apartment. so i sent a text to him and his fiancee and say, hey, this is something you might want to do with the girls, it's in your neighborhood. they were like, oh, thanks,

that's so great. i get a text from jesse that says, "i miss you already." and i was like -- >> juan: oh! >> jesse: it was not meant for you. >> dana: i was flattered. saturday morning. i miss you so much. >> jesse: it was weird, because it was actually for brian kill immediate. >> juan: what about the idea that a computer could settle family disputes over the holidays? >> emily: to me, it's international law, for it to work, you have to subscribe to it. i can imagine if there's really a family fight, alexa says, no, talk about this. you need more of one of those things where you put it on the thing and it emits that high-pitched screech. >> greg: i like the idea of alexa settling disputes because you can say fact check that, alexa. >> dana: we need one for "the five." >> juan: that would be an expensive device. up next, dramatic video showing

a teen girl being snatched off of the street. but it turns out, it could be a hoax. next on " the five."

>> dana: a nightmare scenario caught on tape. could bit a hoax? a 16-year-old teen girl seen dragged into a car and kidnapped right in front of her mother, sparked an amber alert and massive media attention. now sources tell fox news that it appears the girl made it all up and she reportedly did it because of an overprotective mother. pay a lot of attention to these kinds of stories and thought it was scary these things happened. she was having problems with her mom. doesn't want to move. could be a hoax.

>> it seems what we might know thus far, a teenage girl with an overprotective mother and dating a guy she just wants to be with. if it's true, it's a hoax, this is obviously an absolute really unfathomable decision on her part. and it's a felony charge. it's a stage crime that's a felony, right? we all remember jussie smollett. her mother was there. and she was holding on to her, she was pulling her. oh, no, no. the trauma, i can't imagine the trauma that mom felt in that moment that she will never -- i think it will be hard for her to forgive her daughter >> dana: what do you think, jesse? >> jesse: i'm looking at my sources here. they say adam schiff is trying to hire her after this hoax. definitely credentialed to be on the impeachment committee after all that. >> emily: she's not old enough to work in congress. >> jesse: maybe she could be a page for him, who knowles.

i think this boyfriend is probably an amazing boyfriend to pull a stunt like that. >> dana: look, it was reported he's 23 years old. a refuted gang banger, wanted for murder. >> jesse: maybe not the best boyfriend. maybe the mom was right on this one. let me read the story. >> juan: oh, help us. >> dana: i think the mom might have had good instincts. >> jesse: pro mom on this one. you have to ask, why are there so many -- the decade of the hoax? we're in a time accelerated social media and the prehistoric media as well, reward victim hood. i think sometimes kids just read the environment and go, this is one way to get out of something, get some attention. and i feel bad for the mom. she was fighting to save her kid. she was knocked to the ground. i hope the guys that did that are put away. she's got to do a little time. she's a little time. >> dana: the mother was planning to uproot the family and go back to honduras with the daughter

and the daughter didn't want to leave the boyfriend. >> juan: yeah, seems to me that the kid made it up. i don't know for sure. but it looks that way. and as a result, i think a compassionate way to do that is to say the young lady needs help. >> dana: so does the mom after that. >> juan: especially after seeing her daughter yanked away. there's some dysfunction and upset from the mom and the child. >> dana: do you press charges. >> jesse: oh, hell yeah, and i'm not a parent. >> dana: if you're the parent, you would not press charges? >> juan: no, waste of public money. >> dana: against the guys that carried it out. >> juan: the guys were apparently working for the little girl. >> dana: what a mess. not a good holiday story. everything turned out okay. she's back with her mom. >> jesse: no sports analogy. >> dana: that is like when -- >> jesse: no, don't do it. >> dana: okay.

i can't believe it. that sophie opened up a wormhole through time? (speaking japanese) where am i? (woman speaking french) are you crazy/nuts? cyclist: pip! pip! (woman speaking french) i'm here, look at me. it's completely your fault. (man speaking french) ok? it's me. it's my fault? no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on my car insurance with geico. (pterodactyl screech) believe it. geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance. so chantix can help you quit slow turkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking,

or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. talk to your doctor about chantix. if your glasses aren't so will we. no we won't. side effect is nausea. don't forget to use your vision benefits before they're gone. now in-network with vsp. visionworks. see the difference. us. it's what this country is made of. but right now, our bond is fraying. how do we get back to "us"? the y fills the gaps. and bridges our divides. donate to your local y today. because where there's a y, there's an us.

♪

it's how we bring real hope to our cancer patients- like viola. when she was diagnosed with breast cancer, her team at ctca created a personalized care plan that treated her cancer and strengthened her spirit. so viola could focus on her future. their future. this is how we inspire hope. this is how we heal. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now. cancer treatment centers of america. when youyou spend lessfair, and get way more. so you can bring your vision to life and save in more ways than one. for small prices, you can build big dreams, spend less, get way more. shop everything home at wayfair.com

>> greg: my dates for nashville, march 22, now available. oh, this is going to be crazy! i got some special guests. it's going to kick butt. now it's time for this. you know it's going to be crazy. >> amazing. ♪ animals are great animals are great ♪ >> you know what i'm saying. the gender thing is fluid, dana, i don't know if you're aware of it. everybody is fluid. i don't know what i'd if as. but check out this cat that now identifies as a bird. i mean, normally cats would eat the canary, but in this case, he's trying to get him in a romantic mood. and the bird is like, get the hell away from me. this is never going to work. this is never going to work. but you know what?

love transcends all species and differences. and i would like to -- >> dana: that cat is so sweet. he easlicking his chops. i think he's playing with his food. >> greg: it's beautiful. and that's why. ♪ animals are great >> greg: the greatest. the greatest song you will ever hear. so, jesse, speaking of animals. >> jesse: speaking of animals? still on sale. you can afford it, this country is so strong. here's the little rookie man wearing the leash. and we also have jasper. looking on jasper, but, you know what? it's all about the fit. get your leash today. and also, we had our christmas party at the long acre tavern. guess who's missing? >> oh, i was there. >> you left early. >> dana: he left two seconds

before. >> greg: you waited until i left. that's all you guys ever do. >> jesse: we waited and we took the group shot. what is juan wearing? >> juan: oh, i'm wearing the jacket. >> jesse: i have three leashes and i don't even have a pet. >> jesse: that's disgusting. >> greg: add a little spice to the love life. >> dana: oh, my word. >> juan: baby, it's cold outside. much of the country experiencing a sudden drop to temperatures below freeding in the last few days. when i woke up in new york city this morning, it was 17 degrees. and yesterday it felt like new york city was inside a snow globe. watch what happened? yes. that's a snow squall. it lasted just minutes, but it covered the the city in a beautiful christmas cloud of snow. it left less than half an inch of snow on the ground. but across the country, nine

inches of snow right now in st. louis, eight inches in kansas city. frosty the snowman definitely in the usa as the holidays approach. merry christmas to all. >> greg: i hate it! hate it! >> dana: we don't often talk too favorably about the united nations? >> jesse: who are they? >> dana: but yesterday something cool happened. two of the top diplomats in our country, ambassador kelly craft and richard grinell. they got together to bring attention to the criminalization of gay people by dozens of current un member states and the u.s. said we're not going to put up with this. individual men and women around the world face and continue to face punishment and even death because of their sexual orientation. this is a wrong that we seek to right. and it's the beginning of renewed efforts to try to deal with this issue around the world and i think we will be hearing more about this from the united states and the trump administration in the months to

come, which is good leadership, indeed. >> greg: i hope you have something interesting. >> emily: you're going to love this. the best song of all time is "all i want for christmas is you." which is at number one, 25 years later. so after her christmas concert at madison square garden at penn station, listen to what these new yorkers did. ♪ >> jesse: that is cool. i still hate -- >> emily: i'm so sad i missed it. it's the best moment of all time. mariah carrie retweeted it, what an awesome new york moment and mariah carrie moment. >> greg: such an average little singer. all of the manufactured runs -- i hate that. i hate the song, i hate everything about it. >> juan: that's a great song. >> greg: maybe she should collaborate with the melvins.

>> jesse: we love you, melvins. >> greg: melvins and mariah would be amazing. set your dvr, never miss an episode of "the five," "special report" up next. >> bret: the house impeaches president trump but the senate trial is in limbo while house speaker nancy pelosi holds on to the two articles of impeachment. the president declares victory over the federal appeals court, obama care and an exclusive look at nasa's decision to go back to the moon. this is "special report." up in washington, i'm brett baier. the political maneuvering is still happening an it this hour as nancy pelosi has not transferred the articles of impeachment to the senate where a trial will occur but will not continue without the art