each night. don't forget to dvr the show as well. good night from all of us here in new york, you're in for a treat this day, ms. tammy right now. >> thank you, i appreciate it and thank you everyone welcome to sean hannity's program, this is "hannity," i'm tammy bruce in for an entry for sean. house democrats are just becoming a shock in one gigantic life for weeks, pelosi's, shiff, they told that president trump must be impeached as quickly as possible. they called him an imminent danger to the democratic republic and they forced him to vote in record time. now, speaker pelosi is still stalling. she is still refusing to send the articles of impeachment to the senate. president trump is calling her out and today he tweeted "the radical left nothing democrat so they wanted to rush everything

through to the senate because he is a threat to national security." they are vicious, will say anything. now they don't want to go fast anymore, they want to go very slowly. of course, the president is correct. over christmas, president trump had more to say about pelosi's impeachment charade. watch this. >> she hates the republican party. she hates all the people that voted for me. and the republican party. she is desperate -- low, she got thrown out and she lost like 63 seats. 6163, tremendous, record-setting number of seats i think it's going to be happening again. if she's doing a tremendous disservice to the country and she's not doing a good job and some people think that she does not know what she's doing. a lot of people think that and a lot of people said it. >> tammy: i think nancy pelosi knows exactly what she's doing, she clearly wants to prevent the

exoneration of president trump. they have no shame, they do not care about the impact and the senates, now believe president trump will in fact be acquitted on a bipartisan vote. joining us now with more is the author of "witch hunt" fox analyst, along with senior legal advisor to the trump campaign at one of your favorites, jenna ellis. gentlemen, thank you for being here with us tonight. let me ask you about this. it's fascinating what she's doing and some of the arguments are that there is chaos, i don't think there is, i think in fact it's possible it was a point a lot of long that they knew what they lose control. they had no intention of caring about the nature of what the constitution required otherwise it wouldn't happen the first place. >> to claim we have to rush through this with almost no evidence and witnesses or anything, because the president

a race to national security and a threat to the republicans, noble lied about her stopping the process and hanging onto the articles. i think she had a couple things in mind, first of all she wanted the articles before the first of the year to damage the president in election year and i think that backfired. second of all, i think she wants the influence of the senate trial even under article one section three of the constitution, she has no power of authority whatsoever. if she's actually trying to engage in a quid pro quo, and al of i'll send the articles over to you ii approve of the process that you designed and she's doing exactly what she is falsely accusing the president of in the quid pro quo. of >> tammy: obviously, congressman, no shame. i think what they've underestimated here is the american people's reaction to this. it's a sham, but it's more than a fraud. they are doing things that

deliberately damage the republ republic. to say this about the president of the united states when monumental things are happening, around the world, foreign policies affected because of the way that he might be viewed. yet, you're in the position where you need to rush because it affects what you're able to accomplish. >> you have real fact witnesses and i made a request and doug collins said a long list that we talked about about witnesses and we don't have time for that. they're in the majority, they can change the rules, and it allows for a minority witness we did not have them marty witnessed a because time was of the essence. if we had to move on and get this to the senate. if i don't think she thought this through as well as some people think. she did not want to get to this .9 months ago and then she pushed into it. >> tammy: of course, she would have to because it effectively

unconstitutional. perhaps, also, they've been looking at the focus groups on the polling through this like which were to used to accuse him. perhaps a way to see to i if any of this is affecting, and the number of people opposing impeachment are going up. >> i think she's hoping that it will affect people even the longer that she holds onto the articles the less likely that it is and will be a bigger boomerang effect. the other thing is, frankly, i just think she kind of hopes that some magical evidence will drop out of the sky. like which is an witch hunt which really don't exist. >> tammy: or in fact, what started this may be another phone call from another anonymous whistle-blower which would require more investigation and it's a waste of money and certainly. the overall dynamic, congressman, is one that tells the people of the country that we've got to congress that is not doing its own job.

it is trying to still undo -- or stop at a elected president and of course, ironically, because we knew something was wrong with congress and so we were putting him in there to clean this up and away. it's an battle that is occurring because these are incorrect in 2016. >> it because many of the deep state that we really didn't have identified a period of they pop their heads up. there we go. in the days we will be able to eliminate those so that president trump will have more cooperation within their own and administration. >> tammy: pelosi, greg, he's arguing that mitch mcconnell made it clear he's not going to be there. they want all those things -- they know, they know they weren't being fair and now they're afraid like most leftists and those who protect they were of the same thing that's happening. if they want fairness, they want witnesses, they want the same things. this is clearly a political

action and that's when impeachment is. mcconnell has no obligation to even look at this sham that's been provided to them. that's one of my concerns, the argument -- i think they're relying on the process that the process would make them seem legitimate where in fact, mcconnell has every right to be serious about how he looks at this. for crying out loud, a member of the same party. >> it's ironic if not hypocritical as nancy pelosi to the demand due process of the senates that she approves while she denied due process and fundamental fairness in the house procedure over which she was in charge. >> tammy: forgive me, this is one of the issues with two people on site year, we've got jenna ellis who is obviously knows directly what he's been gg through. the impact on the president himself in the function of donald trump and try to get the job done. your sense here now, of what the

delay means and how it's impacting him and you think it's going to be a larger problem in the long term? >> yeah, you know, the reality is politically that president trump approval ratings in the polling numbers are the highest they've ever been in the rubble begins fund-raising is the highest it's ever been and if you look at the american peoe who understand it's a sham, he's up to lately write that nancy pelosi is doing a disservice to the country. she's doing a disservice and that means she's not taking seriously her oath of office to protect and defend the u.s. constitution. this is a sham impeachment, not from a political partisan talking points, certainly, there are those of us who support president trump but we support him because we understand the constitution does not allow the house to impeach for any reason whatsoever. a that's a limited power that's given to congress and they have to abide by only putting forth impeachment when there is

evidence of a crime that fits within article two, section four. there is no evidence whatsoever that came out in the house and i think that's really important for the american people to understand that but it isn't about partisan politics, to vote in the senate should be 100-0. of to acquit president trump because that's what the evidence shows. >> tammy: i would not expect that, we expected to be somewhat bipartisan, but this could be the call where we look at the nature of how partisan it can be and there needs to be some rules applied to stop that to some point. now that we have seen it, be applied to, i think we know we've got work to do. jenna, krugman greg, thank you for joining me. let's turn to the developing story out of washington, d.c. of causing some anxiety among deep state bureaucrats and for good reason. if they ordered a review of all

previous warrant applications involving the fbi attorneys who falsified critical evidence against carter page. however, that's just one person. a fox news is reporting that the court is not ordering fbi revisit other warrants for 17 critical errors and omissions on the page warranty. still, president trump is confident that justice will be served. take a look at this. speak out now, we found out they're a bunch of dirty cops. paid for by the dnc, paid for by hillary clinton in many cases. and as much, they did a phony dossier, that use the dossier for pfizer. as you know, the fisa court, the top coach is very much involved and they will do something about it but these were dirty people, these are bad people, these are evil people that i hope that someday i'm going to consider it my greatest, or one of my greatest achievements getting rid of them.

we have no place for the country like people of them. >> tammy: amongst many that he is direct, he's blonde blunt. many in the mainstream media continue to embarrass themselves with lies, conspiracy theories, and fake news today even "the washington post" called out msnbc's rachel maddow for promoting the discredited steele dossier. i guess earlier today, you are correct. joining in now with mark, our fox news contributor sara carter and john sullivan along with former u.s. attorney bretz all night. thank you for joining me here on the day after christmas, the left never stops so were not going to stop either. of when i say week, it's the point where your reliance on the facts of the matter. the nature of what is genuinely

occurring. let's start with, the president alluded to there. saybrook, and he is a good piec. there's so many details and it gets confusing. we know that the main fisa judge is now beaumont and all the stuff, it's awful on the horowitz report we've got to get all the new information. if how can we trust her. she knew two years ago from a letter from a devin nunes that mirrors his committee in the house and they found exactly for the most part, with a horror wrist reports , all of this is brand-new in the chocking. the fisa judge, and possibly part of the problem here. >> i believe it absolutely is, it's a huge problem, by the way, the column was excellent. we have known this for sometime, those of us that's been investigating this obviously

would have been knee-deep in all of the mess here in washington, d.c. according to devin nunes, the report and the original report that he wrote the fisa court must've known this. if if there was something that went wrong here, and went wrong in the fisa court and think about this. it totally does not give anyone who's been monitored throughout the fisa court has no representation whatsoever. the one thing that the president said that so important here about getting rid of these bad players in the swamp. if it is the fact that he needs to clean house. because if there's nobody to represent, think about this, that's the fourth amendment right to unreasonable searches and seizures. if what the fbi did, kevin klinf the sbi attorney in the case of carter page was stomping all over carter page's rights. of which is the right of all american citizens. >> tammy: this becomes the question, we know carter page's name, we know this could affect all of us. the scary questionable thing

here, with the government on god's great artist, the best con human situation. we've got these individuals begin to think it's their own private company and they can do what they please. they brought out this willingness to say, well, the ends justify the means and john, because we do know carter is affected by this. when i think is shocking is that she limited the request or review to this one fbi person as though it's just about procedures. having known about it for two years, having done nothing in the process, john, is this part of a larger problem, and how you expect this to unfold at the fisa court at this point? >> i've been covering this for two decades, look at the history of the fisa court's behavior. 2002, there's more than 70 violations and creates a more procedures. if there's problems with national security letters, crats

of new procedures. in 2016, obama was exiting the presidency and they dropped hundreds of violations on the court. if nobody got it on him. if that's the dirtiest political trick to be carried out, and nobody cared about the fisa court. three years into this, right, we have 51 known false statements misleading statements or uncorroborated statements a minute before the court. if we are talking about procedul issues and one lawyer, the temptation to do that again will be greater in the course, if attorney general barr does not follow up. >> tammy: it will be worse. >> it will be. >> tammy: it got to this point because clearly it had and you've been working on this for a generation, and it's been going on, there's been no repercussions. if it is now out in the open and they have not been able to hides and when it's out in the open, the system is trying to save itself. with their former position as the attorney here, what's the repercussions -- some are saying

got the rid of the fisa court but it's not that infrastructure. it's the mentality of the people within the system itself. it is that something we can see? >> remember, never understatement a bureaucracy and the ability o of those who lead the progress eat to point the finger at some of the elves. if that's what we've seen, and just add what we've heard it, the fisa court is a court that s extraordinary power and able to actually get a round the fourth, fifth, sixth amendment and delay the application to the targets that they are investigating. let's enormous power. if we have the accountability but we have the increased power that's been given the last two decades. i was there. in congress when jim comey appeared and said, we will not survey on u.s. citizens. guess what, they did, they have been, and we need to find out how many other instances has there been about the failure on the part of those who present evidence to her most powerful court.

>> tammy: and then james clapper who told us the metadata scandals. and the metadata, we were not doing that and later on he said he was lying the least amount that was appropriate. or something to that effect. i'm paraphrasing. but, sarah, we talk about getting rid of agencies or getting rid of particular courts, it really is president trump interestingly who is standing there are now saying, enough is enough. is that perhaps the break that we needed for people to realize that this radio, this game is over? >> it absolutely is, look, how many times have people come forward in congress and others not many, but the stand up and saying there's something wrong with the fisa court. she is the presiding judge, she stepping down, so what else is going to be stopping her place. okay, well, let's review this. if everybody is scared, and particularly the fisa court because they know come march, ce

march, congress has to reauthorize the fisa court again. whether or not this will move forward a period of tammy, let me tell you, i'm not too sure that this is going to happen and i know people are afraid and they don't want to dismantle the court. >> tammywe want the fight will p until december 2020 when we make a statement as america regardless of the party that we want this government back. thank you for all of your perspectives. of the 2020 primaries continue to lean radically left and now they're saying socialist bernie sanders could be the eventual nominee. of our panel breaks it down. stay with us. ♪ ♪music

(children laugh and scream)

(dog barking) ♪music it's the final days of the wish list sales event. hurry in to your lincoln dealer today to get this exceptional offer. [sneeare you ok?fles] yah, it's just a cold. it's not just a cold if you have high blood pressure. most cold medicines may raise blood pressure. coricidin hbp is the... ...#1 brand that gives... powerful cold relief without raising your blood pressure.

♪ >> tammy: welcome back to "hannity," i'm tammy bruce.

of the new extreme democratic party continues to drift further and further left wearied of embracing open borders, higher taxes, and of course, far less to socialism. if none of that does any good for humanity as we've seen historically. get this, even democratic insiders are now admitting that bernie sanders has a path to political. "bernie sanders played no presidential campaign is considered sears lay. they're reconsidering sanders chances." if that's not disturbing enough, aoc said to be quite honored to be his vice president while admitting she's too young to even hold the office. tonight, it could not be more clear the new extreme democrats are running the party and driving the narrative and putting so-called moderates like joe biden, if you want to call him a moderate, putting them on the defensive, while he clings to the front runner stand us, she could use to be plagued by a

weak record and his sons shady dealings overseas. let's take a look. >> i don't think trump is playing chess objectives, he's playing hungry hungry hippo. i get why the president was a circus, a circus is a circus and it's good for everybody that gets confused and we talk about hunter biden. of when we once going after hunter biden, or these guys, its going to be crazy. >> tammy: yeah, that's in the future, crazy. if remember, joe biden is literally on tape admitting to a critical pro. leveraging taxpayer aid to get the prosecutor fired in his zero experience son hunter. not only that, a private investigation from the private investigation firm is alleging a new court filing that hunter biden is actually the subject of multiple criminal investigatio

investigations. but the media would rather just ignore it. and ignore just how disconnected and how dangerous and how destructive the new democratic party has become. joining me now free air reaction, trumpet 2020 campaign secretary, kaylee, along with "the washington times" columnist ann fox news contributor, charlie hurt and "washington examiner" sr. campaign reporter, kerry picket. terry, let's start with you the entire environment here when you're looking at the media covering the democrats and the nature of what it's covering for and accusing donald trump wanting the circus. if he's not in charge of the democratic party. he didn't choose the candidates. they are dealing with the mess of what barack obama left them in the wake of obamacare and his eight years. so, donald trump is sitting back and trying to run the country at the same time. obviously, i think any of the

individuals can become a nominee, but the democratic machine effectively because it's annoyed one. they're talking about biden, are they serious about bernie sanders? >> right now, we sing for it any standers going back into the spotlight and remember, tammy, there's a period of time where he was number one. and the establishment was a freaking out the beds and so's they're saying, joe, you better jump in at one point in save us. then joe biden all of a sudden, he's having the entanglements with his son. we begin to see elizabeth warren have her pop. and all of us and then they're going back out again. if we are seeing bernie sanders pop up again and we are beginning to wonder and it comes around a period >> tammy: it comes around to the media is paying attention to. it bernie sanders, after the

heart attack, he's not really taking anything by the media as well. elizabeth warren was because of the absurd medicare for all $50 trillion circus and she took some heads. of for the moment any attention came to them, they sink. if charlie, do you think this is going to be one of the cases whe either they are hoping he will and no elizabeth warren going away and going down, somebody's not going down, bloomberg. how do you see this coming out in the next month or two as we head into the caucus? >> i have to say, tammy, all along i have believed somebody like joe biden although he is completely marched away from his "disinterest appearing like a sea of obama" sort of platform. he most likely represents the

broad cross-section of the party. as you point out, he's running a disastrous campaign. it would not surprise me one bit to see out of all the wreckage see a bernie sanders wind up without nomination. after all, he won the nomination and 2016. if it just so happens the dnc and the hillary clinton campaign gods of the other conspired to take it away from him but it would not surprise me. i also think that bernie sanders will wind up as the nominee for the party, i think he clearly loses and not only because he's crazy, all his policies are totally infallible to the general election voters breed of their unpalatable to the cross-section of democrats. >> tammy: when i was on the left, even bring up the subject it's a legitimate thing to discuss. moving forward. that is five steps forward, three steps back, we can't dismiss the effort that has to change the mentality of

americans on the scene. if we have seen what they did not anticipate with donald trump reminding them of the greatness of the american ideal. the importance of the republic and certainly capitalism. of at the same time, you've got to the other thing and i've seen the hunter biden dynamic, a little bit of a distraction, but it really in a way sits at a quarter of the problem with the swamp. it's the nepotism, the money, and you wonder how do you become a multimillionaire in public service? now, this is the scene that seems to explain that to a release trip to bear. a do you think this is a hunter biden problem per day. it will this affect the joe biden if he continues to stay at the top? >> it certainly well, tammy, when i travel the nations with the president's rallies, one thing i hear repeatedly is about the washington swamp. the notion that politicians go

in, they are enraged and they cross it off the time in public service and there's no better example of that than hunter biden who had no experience and oil and gas against the lucrative congress in ukraine. the lucrative deal in china, coincidentally, after his father leaves the foreign relation both of the country or visits they are in the case of china, this is at the center. of when hillary clinton had her email problem in the bleach bidding and all of this came out, cnn, and as bc, they did their best to hide it. if i saw it happen, the scandalo hide it from the american people. at the american people are smart, they see through its, and will see the scandals for what t is likely did with the hillary clinton. >> tammy: i think one of the things that's different and all of that and were discussing here, it's social media. its cable television. if the fact that real-time now you can see the news on the smartphone. you can get information as it's occurring. maybe the hunter biden thing, if

he only had three networks to rely on that were covering up, you would not have all the information to be able to make those determinations. then you've got alexandra kazu cortez who seems to be your the representation of the problem when it comes to the voting, economically, historical literacy. she detached yourself to bernie. of clearly it's not the vanity party anymore, but you see the social media as part of the change in how the american people are responding in what they are willing to put up with because we're learning more every day. >> certainly, social media has a lot to do with it, but remember, shirto provide a lot of energy o the democrats in the primaries that they can't provide. if she's not old enough. if unfortunately, they have to wait until 2024. >> tammy: if they imagine this

is the future, they've got some bigger problems than you can imagine because the americans have rejected that in 2016 and the rejecting it now. with everything else we've seen i think they're going to reject it in 2020. it's a legacy of the american public. so it has to get there act together. thank you very much for joining us now today. straight ahead, reacting to the most outrageous examples of the radical far left rage in the holiday season that you will have to see to believe. we will bring to you, so do not go away. we will be right back. ♪ - do you have a box of video tapes, film reels, or photos,

that are degrading? legacybox professionally converts them to dvds, thumb drive, or the cloud. legacybox is simple and safe, with over half a million satisfied customers. visit legacybox.com today, and get 40% off.

♪ >> tammy: welcome back to "hannity," everyone, by the way

merry christmas and mary day after christmas. even on christmas, the chair and holiday spirits, the media can control themselves and they cannot set aside the rabid hatred for all things president trump and anything and everything that offends them. which is really, everything. now branding -- this is extranet, but true, branding hallmark christmas movies "as fascist propaganda. "evangelical christians who support trump would "sell out. watch this. >> they would take this shameless comment over the president and the holy season as we celebrate, they would sell out if they felt they could get something from him. >> tammy: well, he was not the person evoking going chief political point. check this out. >> if you're not doing your best

to show compassion for the poor, the week, the sick, and yes the immigrants and you are doing christmas wrong. i don't care what's on the starbucks cup, loves me and he hates it fox news. bye. >> tammy: the left rage is extending to liberals also across america including new york where governor chris chroma is trying to prevent trump appointed judges from officiating wag weddings. of all federal judges are not allowed to officiate at weddings because some are appointed by trump. for jeanette, right governor is reportedly increasing where the they are jailing gun owners. joining me now with more, fox news contributor dan bongi dan bongino, and every brochure. thank you for being here tonight i palacio hyper show that. it merry christmas. of >> merry christmas pradip >> merry christmas. >> tammy: i have to say, if

you say that the hallmark movies are worse than this, you know things are very good because that's not just over the clip, it really is, there should be going to a typewriter that they have for wherever they are incarcerated a period of it makes sense, i can understand they can't relate to the hallmark movies. i grew up with the single mom, who never is really going to school and that's not how i grew up. it's how people live their lives. of dan, when you're looking at that kind of excavation during e christmas time, the mocking of, taking a shot at fox news, what's the reflection of? >> it's the reflection of a larger eat those on the left and i want to the listeners to never forget this because once you get this and said to it on your brain, everything makes sense,

rights. ithere some liberals who are bad people, but people with bad ideas. if that's not how liberals feel about you. liberals largely think you are bad people with ideas. if that's a big decision. if they think are bad -- they're not arguing on principle. look now. of all of us on that and it's constitutionalist with the impeachment and then you give them the second and oh, not that constitution. of the other constitution we made up 5 minutes ago. if they think you are bad peopl. that's the problem with the left. >> tammy: obviously, the court of this, when you're in the identity politics, the premise there is that your identity or certain identity is better or needs to be helped or supported because the moment that you move into dividing people up with -- slivers of identity or elements

of our self, on the other identity has to be bad. if you have to be better than than white people have to be the enemy. it's inevitable it becomes that shallow. by the way, you want to see the intro and thank goodness this is in the case, the crisp aroma as governor, so they goodness creae in the mists of the kind of thing the left when i was on the left, that was always the argument was that they are bad people and their coming to get you. the tension hygienist a little bit. >> it kind a tremendous amount where people really do their best. look, i don't care if it's any time of year, one of the common threads we should have as americans with respect for one another. respect for people who have different type of lifestyles or people who have different

opinions about different matters. it has to go in both directions. when i hear people say that hallmark is fascist because they represent a certain sense of traditional values, this is offensive to all. homer got in trouble because they took back a campaign about two women kissing on the hallmark movie. that's perfectly fine with me, i don't think they should have gotten it back, they should've put it on and kept it on the air. it lays nothing wrong with that. but to call them fascist over that? is a part of the canceled college movement where if you do anything right, if the stop what you're doing and be canceled. if you stand for traditional values, you may not be speak and you may not be on the town square anymore. this is what's happening on college campuses and people want to spread it as a society. they want to respect each other. >> tammy: look, we got cable television where, you can have the hallmark channel which is like narrow and away. if you've got different channels

with the golfers, diy people, ro your house, in the hallmark channel. which i have to love. again, i wish they had a policy less embarrassing regarding the commercial regarding a gay wedding, and we should not underestimate americans because a good tolerant people. in the meantime, they promoted them through media it's a small group of people like one writer, but then this kind of mood, the idea that moved forward everybody is their way to stop that what can we do about it? >> it's tough, and it's a generational and battle with the left against any objective standards. if they don't want the 12-inch ruler and they want subjective values. they want to get overly complicated on this, the whole essence of socialism is replacing our god-given rights, family rallies, values, and rols

interviewed by the government. if that's the whole reason, nonf this by this the state having been on the left, it's not a mistake that they go after the family of religion and these are immutable i rights, they want little or rights given to by government. at >> tammy: we can agree to disagree on a lot of issues but that's for britain and now arguments about tolerance do now. of it's the most intolerance now that are on the left and that's where the sexism, racism, the homophobia live and it's the framework that perpetuates the idea that people should be isolated and punished ironically for being different. that's what all civil rights movements in america were about and it's about demanding do not be treated differently because of who we are. now look at who is demanding for the opposite now, it's the american left. we can reject it, it's also being aware that this is

occurring and being able to have a conversation and they give very much for joining. i appreciate it. all right, liberal run cities are as we know, that's a presently, spiraling out of control. if from coast-to-coast, charlie couric and janine barela's way in the coming up next. ♪ [sneeze and sniffles]

are you ok? yah, it's just a cold. it's not just a cold if you have high blood pressure. most cold medicines may raise blood pressure. coricidin hbp is the... ...#1 brand that gives... powerful cold relief without raising your blood pressure.

♪ >> min my inspiration administrs committed to helping those who are not receiving any mental health of any kind. of homeless individuals and i think that number has to be much, much higher than that when did you think? over 100,000. if you have some states over

100,000's many individuals with serious mental illness. the same time, we need to keep very dangerous people off our streets and take care of the mental illness for a very dangerous on our streets. >> tammy: was president trump speaking out about his plan to take action against the growing crisis in america's major cities. if when i say major cities, the liberal cities. particularly of course california, los angeles, san francisco, president trump is in fact were in california and the governor, fixer homeless state prices or the feds are stepping in. today, he continued to call out nancy pelosi tweeting "california it leads the nation by far and homeless people and the percentage increase of the homeless population and crazy nancy should focus on that and her very down district and helping her incompetent governor

with the big homeless problem!" california cities are not the only righteous and violent crimes continue to get worse in baltimore because with 33 338 murder so far into the thousand 19, the city is on track to seta per capita or record a of joining us now fox news contributor janine barela, and president, kelly kirk. you know, i want to start with you, i'm a native of los angeles and it's my home state and it's a beautiful state and it's not natural, and the because the weather is go to, not because people who live in california are crazy or who don't want to live inside, this is no. if every time i go back, every few months, it's were sprayed or and over again ends about liberal policies great at what your take on what we know this, we discussed this, they seem to be refusing to admit it. what's your take on this as a whole and whether or not california is going to get the

act together when president trump in this ultimatum. >> not anytime soon, and california is a test cage of how a beautiful functioning, vibrancy could be ruined it simply because of politics. if only because for democrats on every single level in their run by the public teacher unions and left-wing groups that kept the borders open in the streets have become totally unsafe. in san francisco in particular, drug users outnumber high school students. of people and currently enrolled in school. according to not exactly the right wing public station "the san francisco chronicle," it's g what you're saying because this is something that should be leading in every single category but fortunately, the homelessness, the dog usage is becoming a public health crisis the democrats are somebody to blame and yet they keep -- if he actually mentioned it in some of the arguments that use, they say, oh, where different it's because of the weather, it's nonsense.

if it's because of democrats, it's because of liberal control and the ruining america's once great city. >> tammy: is a similar situation with baltimore. it shows you that policy matte matters. the leadership matters. if we see that with president trump changing the horrible trajectory that we were on after eight years with barack obama with a horrible economy in fact, the economy brings people. at the state level, we talk about drug users, i think something like 70% of crime in the shootings of the entire maelstrom of baltimore is related in some way to the drug trade. it's the wear and policy in the regard the attempt to make things nicer or easier to people to not be so harsh on quality of life crimes. is that not we are seeing in baltimore at this stage? with your take on? >> what we are seeing in baltimore is absolutely horrible, look, the crime and the violence that we are seeing.

here's the recipe for disaster and you have corrupt politicians and you have some corrupt police officers. if you have that going on and then you have the fact that there's so many disadvantages tt are taking place because of the high taxes, because of failing public schools and owner regulation. where the opportunities, where are the jobs for these individuals in baltimore? it's a recipe for disaster all around. >> tammy: normally, it's horrible and we have the same dynamic in chicago. you've got going gun-control dynamic, and of course the certain crimes we see the brokew crimes outside or drinking in public. they are not good to act on those anymore and though send signals and have an impact - tht are like drug abuse, but all tht increases and then of course police issues are not being able to arrest and the

corruption issues in the police department is awful. i'll give you the last word on president trump and deeper for him to intervene or you think you will not? >> yes, they should get involved in chicago, baltimore, california, it's a public health crisis and what's happening needs to be addressed and i applaud the president declaration freedom >> tammy: every american deserves to live a decent life greatly appreciate it. if more "hannity" after the break. stay with us. ♪ i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424.

(children laugh and scream) (dog barking) ♪music it's the final days of the wish list sales event. hurry in to your lincoln dealer today to get this exceptional offer.

♪ >> tammy: welcome back to "hannity," i just want to say thank you for to sean for let me fill in this evening for the entire team and that's a great crew of people who bring the program to you. if a virtually right now, that's all the time we have left this evening and they give for joining us if you like tonight's show sign up for fox nation and don't miss any episode because there's a bunch of them with my new show, i'm also the president

of the independent women's voice. learn more about the organization. i will be back in this chair filling in for sean tomorrow night as well. i hope you will join me again and the "the ingraham angle" with adjacent habits filling in for laura ingraham. >> thank you, appreciate it. if i'm jason chaffetz, this is "the ingraham angle." of their continuing the war on law and order. how does the leading 2020 democrats want to make your life better? by making meth and cocaine legal. if the hot debate is coming up plus, the editor of a christian magazine is coining just because the publication will defend president trump. rachel is here on that. and california governor is blaming the trump administration for the states homeless crisis.