tonight. tune in each night at 8:00 eastern >> the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. and don't forget to dvr the show as well. good night from all of us heree in new york. you are in for a treat this day, ms. tammy bruce right now. >> tammy: thank you, i appreciate it and thank you everyone welcome to sean hannity's program. this is "hannity," i'm tammy bruce in tonight for sean. house democrats are just becoming a shock in one gigantic lie for weeks, pelosi, shiff, and that alert they told that president trump must be impeached as quickly as possible. they called him an imminent danger to the democratic republic and they forced him to vote in record time. now, speaker pelosi is still stalling. at this hour, she is still refusing to send the articles of impeachment to the senate. president trump is calling her out and today he tweeted "the radical left nothing democrat so

they wanted to rush everything through to the senate because he is a threat to national security." they are vicious, will say anything. now they don't want to go fast anymore, they want to go very slowly.ey of course, the president is correct. over christmas, president trump had more to say about pelosi's impeachment charade. watch this. >> she hates the republican party. she hates all the people that voted for me. and the republican party. she is desperate -- look, she got thrown out and she lost like 63 seats. 61, 63, tremendous, record-setting number of seats i think it's going to be happening again. she's doing a tremendous disservice to the country and she's not doing a good job and some people think that she does not know what she's doing. a lot of people think that and a lot of people said it. >> tammy: i think nancy pelosi knows exactly what she's doing,

she clearly wants to prevent the exoneration of d president trum. they have no shame, they do not care about the impact and the senates, now believe president trump will in fact be acquitted on a bipartisan vote. joining us now with more is the author of "witch hunt" fox analyst, along with senior legal advisor to the trump campaign at one of your favorites, jenna ellis. gentlemen, jenna, thank you for being here with us tonight. let me ask you about this. it's fascinating what she's doing and some of the arguments are that there is chaos, i don't think there is, i think in fact it's possible it was a point a lot of long that they knew what they lose a control. they had no intention of caring about the nature of what the constitution required otherwise it wouldn't happen the first place. >> to claim we have to rush through this with almost no evidence and witnesses or anything, because the president

a risk to national security and a threat to the republicans, now belied by her stopping the process and hanging onto the articles. i think she had a couple things in mind, first of all she wanted the articles before the first of the year to damage the president in election year and i think that backfired. second of all, i think she wants the influence of the senate trial even under article one, section three of the constitution, she has no power of authority whatsoever. she's actually trying to engage in a quid pro quo, and i'll send the articles over to you if i approve of the process that you designed and she's doing exactly what she is falsely accusing the president of in the quid pro quo. >> tammy: obviously, congressman, no shame. i thinkmm what they've underestimated here is the american people's reaction to this. it's a sham, but it's more than a fraud. they are doing things that deliberately damage the republic.

to say this about the president of the united states when monumental things are happening, around the world, foreign policies affected because of the way that he might be viewed. yet, you're in the position where you need to rush because it affects what you're able to accomplish. >> you have real fact witnesses and i made a request and doug collins said a long list that we talked about about witnesses and we don't have time for that. they're in the majority, they can change the rules, and it allows for a minority witness we did not have them minority witnessed a because time was of the essence. we had to move on and get this to the senate. i don't think she thought this through as t well as some people think. she did not want to get to this point 9 months ago and then she pushed into it. >> tammy: of course, she would have to because it effectively unconstitutional. perhaps, also, they've been

looking at the focus groups on the polling through this like which were to used to accuse him. perhaps a way to see if any of this is affecting, and the number of people opposing impeachment are going up. >> i think she's hoping that it will affect people even the longer that she holds onto the articles the less likely that it is and will be a bigger boomerang effect. ehe other thing is, frankly, i just think she kind of hopesom that some magical evidence will drop out of the sky. like which is an witch hunt which really don't exist. >> tammy: or in fact, what started this may be another phone call from another anonymous whistle-blower which would require more investigation and it's a waste of money and certainly. the overall dynamic, congressman, is one that tells the people of the country that we've got to congress that is not doing its own job.

it is trying to still undo, or stop, at a elected president and of course, ironically, because we knew something was wrong with congress and so we were putting there to clean this up and away it's an battle that is occurring because these are correct in 2016. >> it because many of the deep state that we really didn't have identified. they pop their heads up. there we go. in the days we will be able to eliminate those so that president trump will have more cooperation within their own and administration. >> tammy: pelosi, greg, he's arguing that mitch mcconnell made it clear he's not going to be there. they want all those things -- they know, they know they weren't being fair and now they're afraid like most leftists and those who project they were of the same thing that's happening. they want fairness, they want witnesses, they want the same things. thisam is clearly a political action and that's when

impeachment is. mcconnell has no obligation to evenen look at this sham that's been provided to them. that's one of my concerns, the argument -- i think they're relying on the process that the process would make them seem legitimate, where in fact mcconnell has every right to be serious about how he looks at this.ha for crying out loud, a member of the same party. >> it's ironic if not hypocritical as nancy pelosi to the demand due process of the senates that she approves while she denied due process and fundamental fairness in the house procedure over which she was in charge. >> tammy: forgive me, this is one of the issues with two people on set here, we've got jenna ellis who obviously knows directly what he's been going through. the impact on the president himself in the function of donald trump and try to get theo job done. your sense here now, of what the

delay means and how it's impacting him and you think it's going to be a larger problem in the long term? >> yeah, you know, the reality is politically that president trump approval ratings in the polling numbers are the highest they've ever been in the republican fund-raising is the highest it's ever been and if you look at the american people who understand it's a sham, he's absolutely right that nancy pelosi is doing a disservice to the country. she's doing a disservice and that means she's not taking seriously her oath of office to protect andea defend the u.s. constitution. this is a sham impeachment, not from a political partisan talking points, certainly, there are those of us who support president trump but we support him because we understand the constitution does not allow the house to impeach for any reason whatsoever.on that's a limited power that's given to congress and they have to abide by only putting forth impeachment when there is

evidence of a crime that fits acwithin article two, section four. there is no evidence whatsoever that came out in the house and i think that's really important for the american people to understand that but it isn't about partisan politics, to vote in the senate should be 100-0 to acquit president trump because that's what the evidence shows. >> tammy: i would not expect that, we expected to be somewhat bipartisan, but this could be the call where we look at the nature of how partisan it can be and there needs to be some rules applied to stop that to some point. now that we have seen it be applied to, i think we know we've got work to do.t, jenna, congressman, greg, thank you for joining me. let's turn to the developing story out of washington, d.c. causing some anxiety among deep state bureaucrats and for good reason.

the fisa court ordered a review of all previous warrant applications involving the fbi attorneys who falsified critical evidence against carter page. however, that's just one person. a fox news is reporting that the court is not ordering fbi revisit other warrants for 17 critical errors and omissions on the page warranty. trump isesident confident that justice will be served. take a look at this. >> now, we found out they're a bunch of dirty cops. paid for by the dnc, paid for by hillary clinton in many cases. and as much, they did a phony dossier, that use the dossier for fisa. as you know, the fisa court, the top coach is very much involved and they will do something about it but these were dirty people, these are bad people, these are evil people that i hope that someday i'm going to consider it my greatest, or one of my greatest achievements getting rid of them.

we have no place in the country for people like them. >> tammy: amongst many that he is direct, he's blunt. many in the mainstream media continue to embarrass themselves with lies, conspiracy theories, and fake news today even "the washington post" called out msnbc's rachel maddow for promoting the discredited steele dossier.st i guess earlier today, you are correct. joining in now with mark, our fox news contributor sara carter and john sullivan along with former u.s. attorney, brett tolman. thank you for joining me here on the day after christmas, the left never stops so were not going to stop either. when i say we, it's the point of

view that is reliant on the facts of the matter. the nature of what is genuinely occurring. let's start with, the president alluded to there. sara, and he is a good piece on this. there's so many details and it gets confusing. we know that the main fisa judge is now bemoaning all the stuff, it's awful on the horowitz report we've got to get all the new information. how can we trust her. she knew two years ago from a letter from a devin nunes that mirrors his committee in the house and they found exactly, for the most part, with the horowitz reports. all of this is brand-new in the shocking. the fisa judge, and possibly part of the problem here. >> i believe it absolutely is, it's a huge problem, by the way, the column was excellent. -- kimberley strassel comment

was excellent. we have known this for sometime, those of us that's been investigating this obviously would have been knee-deep in all of the mess here in washington, d.c. according to devin nunes, the report and the original report that he wrote the fisa court must've t known this. if therere was something that wt wrong here, and went wrong in the fisa court and think about this. it totally does not give anyone who's been monitored throughout the fisa court has no representationon whatsoever. tithe one thing that the presidt said that so important here about getting rid of these bad players in the swamp. it is the fact that he needs to house. because if there's nobody to represent, think about this, that's the fourth amendment right to unreasonable searches and seizures. what the fbi did, kevin kline of the fbi attorney in the case of carter page was stomping all over carter page's rights. which is the right of all american citizens. >> tammy: this becomes the question, we know carter page's name, we know this could affect all of us.me the scary questionable thing here, with the best government

on god's great earth, the best country in human situation. we've gott, these individuals begin to think it's their own private company t and they can o what they please. they brought out this willingness to say, well, the ends justify the means and john, because we do know carter is affected by this. when i think is shocking is that she limited the request or review to this one fbi person as though it's just about procedures. having known about it for two years, having done nothing in the process, john, is this part of a larger problem, and how you expect this to unfold at the fisa court at this point? >> i've been covering this for two decades, look at the history of the fisa court's behavior. 2002, there's more than 70 violations and creates a more procedures. there's problems with national security letters, creates of new procedures. in 2016, obama was exiting the

presidency andit they dropped hundreds of violations on thee court. nobody got it on him. o that's the dirtiest political trick to be carried out, and nobody cared about the fisa court. three years into this, right, we have 51 known false statements misleading statements or uncorroborated statements a minute before the court.ve we are talking about procedural issues and one lawyer, the temptation to do that again will be greater in the course, if attorney general barr does not follow up. >> tammy: it will be worse. >> itt will be. >> tammy: it got to this point because clearly it had, and you've been working on this for a generation, and it's been going on, there's been no repercussions. it is now out in the open and they have not been able to hide as and when it's out in the open, the system is trying to save itself. with their former position as the attorney here, what's the repercussions -- some are saying

got the rid of the fisa court but it's not that infrastructure. it's the mentality of the people within the system itself. it is that something we can see? >> remember, never understatement a bureaucracy and the ability of those who lead the bureaucracy to point the finger at somebody else. that's what we've seen, and just add what we've heard it, the fisa court is a court that has extraordinary power and able to actually get a round the fourth, fifth, sixth amendment and delay the application to the targets that they are investigating. let's enormous power. we have the accountability but we have the increased power that's been given the last two decades. i was there. in congress when jim comey appeared and said, we will not survey on u.s. citizens. guess what, they did, they have been, and we need to find out how many other instances hasd there been about the failure oni the part of those who present evidence to our most powerful court. >> tammy: and then

james clapper who told us the metadata scandals. and the metadata, we were not doing that and later on he said he was lying the least amount that was appropriate. or something to that effect. i'm paraphrasing. but, sara, we talk about getting rid of agencies or getting rid of particular courts, it really is president trump interestingly who is standing there are now saying, enough is enough. is that perhaps the break that we needed for people to realize that this radio, this game is over? >> itt absolutely is, look, how many times have people come forward in congress and others not many, but the stand up and saying there's something wrong with the fisa court. she is the presiding judge, she stepping down, so what else is going to be stopping her place. okay, well, let's review this. everybody is scared, and particularly the fisa court because they know come march, come march, congress has to

reauthorize the fisa court again. whether or not this will move forward. sutammy, let me tell you, i'm nt too sure that this is going to happen and i know people are afraid and they don't want to dismantle the court. >> tammy: the fight will go up until december 2020 when we make ama statement as america regardless of the party that we want this government back. thank you for all of your perspectives. up next, the 2020 primaries continue to lean radically left, and now they're saying socialist bernie sanders could be the eventual nominee. our panel breaks it down. stay with us. ♪ i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync,

keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424.

♪ >> tammy: welcome back to ♪ "hannity," i'm tammy bruce.

the new extreme democratic party continues to drift further and further left wearied of embracing open borders, higher taxes, and of course, far less ffto socialism. none of that does any good for humanity as we've seen historically. get this, even democratic insiders are now admitting that bernie sanders has a path to politico. "bernie sanders presidential campaign is considered seriously. they're reconsidering sanders chances." if that's not disturbing enough, alexandria ocasio-cortez said she would be "quite honored to be his vice president while admitting she's too young to even hold the office." tonight, it could not be more clear the new extreme democrats are running the party and driving the narrative and putting so-called moderates like joe biden, if you want to call him a moderate, putting them on thee defensive, while he clings to the front runner standing, he could use to be plagued by a

weak record and his son, hunter's, dealings overseas. let's take a look. >> i don't think trump is playing chess objectives, he's playing hungry hungry hippo. i get why the president was a circus, a circus is a circus and it's good for everybody that gets confused and we talk about hunter biden. when we once going after hunter biden, or these guys, it's going to be crazy. >> tammy: yeah, that's in the future, crazy. remember, joe biden is literally on tape admitting to a quid pro quo. leveraging taxpayer aid to get the prosecutor fired in his zero experience son hunter. not only that, a private investigation from the private investigation firm is alleging a new court filing that hunter biden is actually the subject of multiple criminal investigations.

mubut the media would rather jut ignore it, and ignore just how disconnected and how dangerous and how destructive the new democratic party has become. joining me now free airmp -- four reaction trumped 2020 campaign secretary, kayleigh, along with "the washington times" columnist ann fox news contributor, charlie hurt and "washington examiner" senior campaign reporter, kerry picket. kerry, let's start with you the entire environment here when you're looking at the media covering the democrats and the nature of what it's covering for and accusing donald trump wanting the circus. he's not in charge of the democraticum party. he didn't choose the candidates. they are dealing with the mess of what barack obama left them in the wake of obamacare and his eight years. so donald trump is sitting back yand trying to run the countryt the same time. obviously, i think any of the individuals can become a nominee, but the democratic

machine effectively because it's annoyed one. -- anoint one. they're talking about biden, are they serious about bernie sanders? >> right now, we are seeing bernie sander going back into the spotlight and remember, tammy, there's a period of time where he was number one. and the establishment was a freaking out a bit and so's they're saying, yo, joe, you better jump in at one point in save us. then joe biden all of a sudden, he's having the entanglements with his son. we begin to see elizabeth warren have her pop. and all of us and then they're going back out again. we are seeing bernie sanders pop upg again and we are beginning o wonder and it comes around. >> tammy: it comes around to the media is paying attention to. bernie sanders, after the heart attack, he's not really taking

anything by the media as well. elizabeth warren was because of the absurd medicare for all $50 trillion circus and she took some heads. for the moment any attention came to them, they sink. charlie, do you think this is going to be one of the cases where either they are hoping he will and no elizabeth warren going away and going down, somebody's not going down, bloomberg. where did you see all of this coming out in the next month or two as we head into the caucus? >> i have to say, tammy, all along i have believed somebody like joe biden although he is completely marched away from his "disinterest of the legacy of obama" sort of platform. i do think that he most likely

represents the broad cross-section of the party. as you point out, he's running a disastrous campaign. it would not surprise me one bit to see out of all the wreckage see a bernie sanders wind up without nomination. after all, he won the nomination and 2016. it just so happens the dnc and the hillary clinton campaign got together and conspired to take it away from him, but it would not surprise me. i also think that bernie sanders will wind up as the nominee for ethe party, i think he clearly loses and not only because he's crazy, all his policies are totally unpalatable to the general election voters. they're unpalatable to the cross-section of democrats. >> tammy: when i was on the left, even bring up the subject it's a legitimate thing to discuss. moving forward. that is five steps forward, three steps back, we can't dismiss the effort that has to change the mentality of

americans on the scene. we have seen what they did not anticipate with donald trump reminding them of the greatness of the american ideal. the importance of the republic and certainly capitalism. at the same time, you've got to the other thing and i've seen the hunter biden dynamic, a little bit of a distraction, but it really in a way sits at a quarter of the problem with the -- core of the problem with the swamp. it's the nepotism, the money, and you wonder how do you become a multimillionaire in public service? now, this is the scene that seems to explain that to be really stripped t bare. do you think this is a hunter biden problem per day. is this something that will affect joe biden if he continues to stay at the top? >> it certainly well, tammy, when i travel the nations with the president's rallies, one thing i hear repeatedly is about the washington swamp. the notion that politicians go in, theyam are enraged and they

cross it off the time in public service and there's no better example of that than hunter biden who had no experience and oil and gas against the lucrative congress in ukraine. -- contract in ukraine. the lucrative deal in china, avcoincidentally, after his fatr leaves the foreign relation both of the country or visits they are in the case of china, this is at the center. when hillary clinton had her emailem problem in the bleach bidding and all of this came out, cnn, and msnbc, they did their best to hide it. i was a contributor at the time. i saw it happen, the scandals to hide it from the american people. but i can tell you this, the american people are smart, they see through its, and will see the scandals for what it is likely did with the hillary clinton. >> tammy: i think one of the things that's different and all of that and were discussing here, it's social media. its cable television. the fact that real-time now you can see the news on the smartphone. you can get information as it's occurring. maybe the hunter biden thing, if

he only had three networks to rely on that were covering up, you would not have all the tinformation to be able to make those determinations. then you've got alexandra ocasio-cortez who seems to be the representation of the problem when it comes to the voting, economically, historical literacy. she attached yourself to bernie sanders. clearly it's not the kennedy party anymore, but you see the social media as part of the change in how the american people are responding in what they are willing to put up with because we're learning more every day. >> certainly, social media has a lot to do with it, but remember, alexandria ocasio-cortez provided a lot of energy to the democrats in the primaries that they can't provide. she's t not old enough. unfortunately, they have to wait until 2024. >> tammy: if they imagine this

is the future, they've got some bigger problems than you can imagine because the americans have rejected that in 2016 and the rejecting it now. with everything else we've seen i think they're going to reject it e in 2020. it's a legacy of the american public. so it has to get there act together. thank you very much for joining us now today. straight ahead, reacting to the most outrageous examples of the radical far left rage in the holiday season that you will have to see to believe.t we will bring to you, so do not go away. we will be right back. ♪ when we started our business

we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free. ♪ >> tammy: ♪ >> tammy: welcome back to

"hannity," everyone, by the way merry christmas and merry day after christmas. even on christmas, the cheer and holiday spirits, the media can control themselves and they cannot set aside the rabid hatred for all things president trump and anything and everything that offends them. which is really everything. now branding -- this is extranet, but true, branding hallmark christmas movies "as fascist propaganda." meanwhile,ho evangelical christians who support trump would, "sell jesus out." watch this. >> they would take this shameless con man over the president and the holy season as we celebrate, they would sell out if they felt they could get something from him. >> tammy: well, he was not the person evoking going chief political point. check this out. >> if you're not doing your best

to show compassion for the poor, the week, the sick, and yes the immigrants and you are doing christmas wrong. i don't care what's on the starbucks cup, jesus loves me and he hates it fox news. bye. >> tammy: the left rage is extending to liberals also across america including new york where governor chris crisco omo is trying to prevent trump appointed judges from officiating weddings. all federal judges are not allowed to officiate at weddings because some are appointed by trump. virginia, right governor is reportedly increasing where the they are jailing gun owners. joining me now with more, fox news contributor dan bongino. thank you for being here tonight. i appreciate it. merry christmas.

>> merry christmas. >> merry christmas. >> tammy: i have to say, if you say that the hallmark movies are worse than this, you know things are very good because that's not just over the clip, it really is, there should be going to a typewriter that they have for wherever they are incarcerated. it makes no sense, i can rederstand they can't relate to the hallmark movies. i grew up with the single mom, who never is really going to school and that's not how i grew up. it's how people live their lives. dan, when you're looking at that kind of accusation during the christmas time, the mocking of, taking a shot at fox news, what's the reflection of? >> it's the reflection of a larger eat those on the left and i want to the listeners to never forget this because once you get this and said to it on your brain, everything makes sense,

rights. conservatives paint dominic think liberals are people with bad ideas. that's not how liberals feel about you. liberals largely think you are bad people with ideas. lythat's a big decision. they think are bad -- they're not arguing on principle. look now. all of us on that and it's constitutionalist with the impeachment and then you give them the second and oh, not that constitution. the other constitution we made up 5 minutes ago. they think you are bad people. that's the problem with the left. >> tammy: obviously, the court of this, when you're in the identity politics, the premise there is that your identity or certain identity is better or needs to be helped or supported because the moment that you move into dividing people up with, slivers of identity or elements of our self, on the other

identity has to be bad. if you have to be better than thanas white people have to be e enemy. it's inevitable it becomes that shallow. by the way, you want to see the intro and thank goodness this isn't the case, the chris promo as governor, so thank goodness. in the midst of the kind of thing when i was on the left,th that was always the argument was that they are bad people and their coming to get you. the tension heightened a little bit. hasn't it? >> it kind a tremendous amount where people really do their best.le look, i don't care if it's any time of year, one of the common threads we should have as americans with respect for one another. respect for people who have different type of lifestyles oro people who have different opinions about different

matters. it has to go in both directions. when i hear people say that hallmark is fascist because they represent a certain sense of traditional values, this is offensive to all. homer got in trouble because -- hallmark got in trouble because they took back a campaign about two women kissing on the hallmark movie. that's perfectly fine with me, i don't think they should have gotten it back, they should've put it on and kept it on the air. there's nothing wrong with that. but to call them fascist over that? is a part of the cancel college movement where if you do anything right, if the stop what you're doing and be canceled. if you stand for traditional values, you may not be speak and you may not be on the town square anymore. this is what's happening on college campuses and people want to spread it as a society. they want to respect each other. >> tammy: look, we got cable television where, you can have the hallmark channel which is like away.

you've got different channels with the golfers, diy people, redo your house, in the hallmark channel. which i have to love. again, i wish they had a policy less embarrassing regarding the commercial regarding a gay wedding, and we should not underestimate americans because they're a good tolerant people. in the meantime, they promoted them through media it's a small group of people like one writer, but then this kind of mood, the idea that moved forward everybody is their way to stop that? what can we do about it? >> it's tough, and it's a generational and battle with the left against any objective standards. if they don't want the 12-inch ruler and they want subjective values. they want to get overly complicated on this, the whole essence of socialism is replacing our god-given rights, family values, and roles interviewed byia the government.

that's the whole reason, none of this by this the state having been on the left, it's not a mistake that they go after the family of religion and these are immutable movements and rights, they want little rights given by government. >> tammy: we can agree to disagree on a lot of issues but that's forbidden and now arguments about tolerance do away now. --- win out. it's the most intolerance now that are on the left and that's where the sexism, racism, the homophobia live and it's the framework that perpetuates the idea that people should behed isolated and punished ironically for being different. that's what all civil rights movements in america were about and it's about demanding do not be treated differently because of who we are. now look at who is demanding for the opposite now, it's the american left.

we can reject it, it's also being aware that this is occurring and being able to have a conversation and thank you very much for joining. i appreciate it. all right, liberal run cities are as we know, no surprisingly, spiraling out of control. from coast-to-coast, charlie couric and janine barela weigh for us, coming up next. ? ♪

♪ >> min ♪ >> my administration is committed to helping those who are not receiving any mental health of any kind. homeless individuals and i think that number has to be much, much higher than that wouldn't did you think? over 100,000. you have some states over 100,000's many individuals with serious mental illness.

the same time, we need to keep very dangerous people off our streets and take care of theak mental illness for a very dangerous on our streets. >> tammy: that was president trump speaking out about his plan to take action against the growing crisis in america's major cities. when i say major cities, the liberal cities. particularly of course california, los angeles, san francisco, president trump isng in fact were in california and the governor, fix your homeless state prices or the -- crisis or the feds are stepping in. today, he continued to call out nancy pelosi tweeting "california leads the nation, by far, in homeless people, and the percentage increase in the homelessnd population -- two terrible stats. crazy nancy should focus on that in her very down district, and

helping her incompetent governor with the big homeless problem!" but that unfortunately, california cities are not the only righteous and violent crimes continue to get worse in baltimore because with 338 murder so far into the 2019, the city is on track to set a per capita or record a of joining us now fox news contributor janine barela, and president, charlie kirk. you know, i want to start with you, i'm a native of los angeles and it's my home state and it's a beautiful state and it's not natural, and the because the weather is go to, not because people who live in california are crazy or who don't want to this is no.se every time i go back, every few -- e new. months, it's were sprayed over and over again ends about liberal policies great at what your take on what we know this, we discussed this, they seem to be refusing to admit it. what's your take on this as a whole and whether or not california is going to get the act together when

president trump in this ultimatum. >> not anytime soon, and california is a test cage of how a beautiful, functioning, -- case of how s vibrancy could be ruined it simply because of politics. only because for democrats on every single level in their run by the public teacher unions and left-wing groups that kept the borders open in the streets have become totally unsafe. in san francisco in particular, drug users outnumber high school students. people and currently enrolled in school.nc according to not exactly the right wing publication, "the san francisco chronicle," it's amazing what you're saying because this is something that should be leading in every single category but fortunately, the homelessness, the drug usage is becoming a public health crisis. the democrats are somebody to blame and yet they keep -- if he actually mentioned it in some of the arguments that use, they say, oh, where different it's because of the weather, it's nonsense. it's because of democrats, it's because of liberal control and

the ruining america's once great city. >> tammy: it's a similar situation with baltimore. it shows you that policy matters. the leadership matters. we see that with president trump changing the horrible trajectory that we were on after eight years with barack obama with a horrible economy in fact, the economy brings people. at the state level, we talk about drug users, i think something like 70% of crime in the shootings of the entire maelstrom of baltimore is related in some way to the drug trade. where and policy in this regard attempt to make things nicer or easier to people to not be so harsh on quality of life crimes. is that not we are seeing in baltimore at this stage? what's your take on? >> what we are seeing in baltimore is absolutely horrible, look, the crime and the violence that we are seeing. here's the recipe for disaster and you have corrupt politicians

and you have some corrupt police officers. you have that going on and then you have the fact that there's so many disadvantages that are taking place because of the high taxes, because of failing public schools and owner regulation. where the opportunities, where are the jobs for these individuals in baltimore? it's a recipe for disaster all around. >> tammy: normally, it's horrible and we have the same dynamic in chicago. you've got h gun-control, and of course the certain crimes we see the broken window crimes outside or drinking in public. they are not good to act one those anymore and though send signals and have an impact -- or like drug abuse, but all that increases and then of course police issues are not being able to arrest, and the corruption

issues in the police department is awful. i'll give you the last word on president trump and do you prefer him to intervene or you think you will not? >> yes, they should get involved in chicago, baltimore,? california, it's a public health crisis and what's happening needs to be addressed and i applaud the president declaration. >> tammy: every american deserves to live a decent life. thank you. greatly appreciate it. more "hannity" after the break. stay with us. ♪

these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter

any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again!

♪ ♪ >> tammy: welcome back to "hannity," i just want to say thank you for to sean for let me fill in this evening for the entire team and that's a great crew of people who bring the program to you. unfortunately, right now, that's all the time we have left this evening and thank you for joining us if you like tonight's show sign up for fox nation and don't miss any episode because there's a bunch of them with my new show, i'm also the president

of the independent women's voice. i learn more about the organization. i will be back in this chair filling in for sean tomorrow night asac well. i hope you will join me again, and the "the ingraham angle" with jason chaffetz filling in for laura ingraham. >> jason: thank you, appreciate it. i'm jason chaffetz, this is "the ingraham angle." 2020 democrats are continuing the war on law and order. how does the leading 2020 democrats want to make your life better? by making meth and cocaine legal. of course. the hot debate is coming up plus, the editor of a christian magazine is coining just because -- quitting just because the publication will defend president trump. rachel is here on that. and california governor is blaming the trump administration for the states homeless crisis. trump is h