't know because no one can get access to the crash site. 176 people have died. we are waiting for answers, sean. >> sean: thank you, benjamin. unfortunate, that all the time we have left. please set your dvr. we are not the hate-trump media. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham. >> laura: hannity, don't you get the sense that some democrats almost seem to be bordering -- coach my words here -- they are almost disappointed that there wasn't more chaos, there wasn't more, you know, upheaval created by these missile strikes. it's amazing. >> sean: it's also the mob and the media. they literally are reporting -- this is nbc so-called "news" and fake news cnn. and then over on nbc, they are reporting iranian reports of death that never happened. all night long. >> laura: no. >> sean: if we did that.

>> laura: but it's really -- at this point, you are dealing with iran, you're not dealing with a two bit nation. this is a serious, serious situation. >> sean: i'm laughing because you are right. it's absurd. don't have truth telling media. they are gone. it's over. it's dead. >> laura: i don't know if it ever recovered, sean, but you had a fantastic show tonight. >> sean: great show last night, as well. >> laura: great ratings, hannity. you're killing it. congrats for being number 1 in 2019. watch out, i will catch you in 2020.. have a good night. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight. we have another pack show. the iran debate simmers as the media continue to deny that this is a positive outcome for you, for america, our security. democrats look to strip president trump of his war powers. minority leader kevin mccarthy is here in just a few minutes with an insider account of what went down today for capitol hill. also, remember when the media slobbered all over nancy pelosi's pathetic move to

withhold impeachment articles from the senate? well, now even her own party is beginning to have second thoughts. plus, devin nunes is here with a huge announcement that could reveal more about the whistle-blower who started this whole ukraine deal. and congresswoman ilhan omar with another absolutely pathetic and disgusting display. then there was a royal falling flameout.co-alarmist arroyo has it all in "seen and unseen." but first, two attacks, two failures, that's the focus of tonight's "angle." ♪ president trump's enemies at home and abroad are really frustrated right now, and i can't blameea them. they keep launching attacks, but the president a just keeps gettg stronger, and the republicans more unified. and through it all, our economy, our markets, they just shrug it off, and they keep going higher.

well, last night iran, of course, fired their show missiles into iraq where our troops are stationed, doing some damage, but without casualties, thank goodness, but that's nott the only assault on this president that sizzled. at home, we see the same thing with the impeachment fiasco. with the articles of impeachment, i kind of picture nancy pelosi playing a game of san francisco hold 'em. she has her cards close to the vest, but it really means she doesn't want a senate trial after all.st because she wants zero concessions from mitch mcconnell, and now members of her own party are turning against her. >> we talked to a lot of the same senators today, were all saying, let's get this going. we have a job to do. let'se just get this trial moving, and just get it over with. >> laura: now, the ones revolting aren't junior senators, either. just today, dianne feinstein, joe manchin, chris coons, even the far left richard blumenthal are now all questioning the speaker's decision-making.

but it seems just like yesterday, doesn't it, that the queen could do no wrong? >> the american people happen to be on the side of speaker pelosi, that's the great leverage that she has here. >> nancy pelosi has been a light worker in dark times. >> i do think she has had a lit just brilliantly. >> she has been pitch-perfect. and this is her flock, these democrats. >> how she is leaving us in the impeachment inquiry is a perfect example of what a great leader she is. >> her whole career is leading to these two weeks, that puts her soundly in history books. >> laura: history books? may be the history of failure, mr. -- thrill up your leg. meanwhile americans are seen through the bogus investigations, and you've got to check these out. they have trump beating most of his rivals, even in virginia. more senators see this, it's just another flop for the resistance.

when pressed on her impeachment strategy today, speaker pelosi couldn't hide her aggravation. >> are they going to be transmitted tonight? anytime soon? >> what the arena is that we would be setting them, we haven't seen that. i don't know how many more times i have to say that or how many times you want to ask me. >> laura: what is that on her lapel there? i'm trying to figure out kind of bird thatt was. maybe it's a chicken. at this point, i think pelosi should just waive the right flag and caving to the impeachment demands of the radicals in her caucus was a huge blunder. but she's not going to do that. the bluster and the posturing will continue. indeed, i predict she will try to claim victory here. someone else's claiming victory today following a different

failed attack on the trump administration. iran's president hassan rouhani pledged to kick all american forces out of the middle east. but like nancy at the 11th hour, when push came to shove, he blinked. iran's cruise missiles, by his own admission, were just a slap in the face, they want a lethal -- they weren't a lethal strik. democrats were predicting this was all going to end up essentially as world war iii. >> the president, by blowing up diplomacy, has led to great chaos in the region, and that is why we are at the brink of potential war right now. >> those lives may be at risk because of the fallout from this action. >> let's all hope that we do not get to an open conflict with iran, because that'll be a very serious war that will make the iraq war look like a minor scuffle. >> laura: now, to some, this sounded like wish casting. they almost hoped trump would t act rashly and ramp up tensions. but he did not. today, he showed the

restraint not to escalate the situation, but to build on the reagan approach of peace through strength. >> we must also make a deal that allows iran to thrive and prosper and take advantage of its enormous, untapped potential.lo iran can be a great country. peace and stability cannot prevail in the middle east as long as iran continues to foment violence, unrest, hatred, and war. >> laura: think about all the hyperbole we have heard from democrats recently. trump's dealings on ukraine will bring down his presidency. then it was he was ordered of soleimani will trigger asymmetrical attacks, mass carnage. well, this is nothing more than the dark art of projection. what president trump's foes do not understand, or they forget, is that he himself is the master of asymmetrical fighting. he and his team not only managed

to turn impeachment into a positive, but they may have, by getting a top terrorist, forced iran back to the negotiating table. giving trump's resilience in the face of attacks, both democrats and iran would do well to think twice before launching any new assaults. and that's the "angle." joining me now is house minority leader kevinin mccarthy. congressmen, great to see you tonight. today pelosi -- he saw that clip, was visibly annoyed. what are you going to some the articles, what's going on? she seemed very frustrated in this position. what's our calculation? what is the pro and con for her here? >> well, she has no con. she is going to fail at this. she has already failed. now's not just republicans, democrats senators. was even worse is dianne feinstein. this is our home senator, her hometown senator from

san francisco.ei she literally said if it is so urgent, if you keep it, it loses its urgency. either send it over or don't send it at all. it's crushing her. >> laura: but what if the househa decides on its own to subpoena bolton? this theory has been floated the last 72 hours, they could subpoena bolton and get information from him and i don't know, backfill the impeachment inquiry, that is what they are saying now. >> they had the opportunity, but they didn't think it was important enough, that was so urgent, they had enoughad information, lo and behold, when it went to the floor, it was not there. they know the case is so weak, it's like she's embarrassed of it. >> laura: to the iran issue, democrats came out of the administers briefings breathingg steady on capitol hill and were all pretty much singing the same tune. watch. >> i was deeply surprised at the lack of information presented by the administration regarding a

specific, imminent threat. >> there was no raw evidence presented that there was an imminent threat. >> i was utterly unpersuaded about any evidence about the imminence of a threat that was new or compelling. >> laura: um, are they all lie and? mike lee is essentially saying the same thing as all of these democrats, a conservative from utah. >> it is a top-secret hearing, but i don't know what they're talking about. saying for one moment to the american public -- they don't have to be in that meeting -- more than 600 american soldiers have been killed by this individual. they killed an american. they took down a drone. they bombed tankers, they bombed saudi arabia's refinery. they took after our embassy. and somehow, it's also escalating something? it' think the way the president handled this was masterful. it's like a chess game, and these people don't even know what they're talking about. they are now the socialist

democrats are defending iran over defending america. >> laura: mike lee said it was the worst briefing he had ever seen basically stating conclusory comments about the imminence without actual facts of time, place, manner, what's thing to happen. >> i wish i could share with you what was said. >> laura: why do you think he is saying that? >> i don't know why he was saying that. i was not in the senate briefing, i was in the house?? breathing. >> laura: it must have been -- briefing. the same. >> the same members from cia, secretary -- >> laura: with a condescending? >> not at all. with interesting, if i could only share, the way people ask questions and come back, they would get the answer they asked and they try to come back, like they couldn't hear it. it was answered, i don't understand that. it was embarrassing, because here they are, they want to defend this terrorist. he's a bad guy, but. i want to hear democrats say, he's a bad guy because he killed americans, because he went after our embassy, because he killed another american, because he went after the tankers.

>> laura: after playing the tactics of perpetual resistance for three years now, it's amazing to see and hear the democrats claiming that it is the president and wants to divide the country at a time like this, but that's exactly what happened. leon panetta was a pretty well-respected guy, on with anderson cooper. let's watch. >> this moment of potential national unity and national, kind of relief, he, you know, chose it, lay it on, attacked president obama. >> he's almost deliberately tried to split this country apart. all he cares about is whether or not his supporters continue to support him. i think that's a serious mistake. >> laura: so, did. the president miss a historic opportunity to bring the nation together today?, >> no, i think what he did was he made this world safer. think for a moment, what if we were able to stop bin laden before 9/11 happened?? think about how many more people are safe.

and think about history will look like in the future because of how strong this president acted. he held restraint when a droneik went down, but when they killed an american from a redline on the sand, and he actually acted. >> laura: i would say, what if we could have knocked out saddam before he went to war again? and when he traveled to kuwait, knock him out. >> exactly. this is such a joke, they are bringing him under what is called a con resolution. >> laura: tomorrow. tomorrow. >> you got to understand how they are bringing it up, it is con resolution, the same kind of resolution we use to do a soap box derby on capitol hill. it doesn't go to the president. it means nothing. >> laura:so so they are doing iw too,n what? for what purpose? >> i don't know, to appease the social space, but has no power, no meeting, it equal to a soap box derby. >> laura: congressman alisa slotkin, the sponsor of this legislation -- >> she should be embarrassed. >> laura: this is a battleground state. everyone watching-- michigan, ts is your congresswoman. let's play it and have you rea

react. >> we should, as a body, be discussing and debating if there is even a risk of us going into war with iran. i just wanted to put the marker down and be very, very clear because we are pass this moment, doesn't mean congress has a right to abdicate its responsibilities. >> laura: very high-minded, congressmen. >> she knows betterr than this, if you read her background. and you know what is most interesting? she is allowing her name to be used as a trick. with a resolution that means nothing, it doesn't have any meaning whatsoever, and they're trying to play something up, and then they're trying to tie the hands, and are they forgetting what iran has done to the american soldier? what iran has done -- >> laura: she knows, she served in iraq and the cia. she served our country. >> what is the speaker doing to these new members? walking them off the cliff on impeachment, now defending iran over defending america. >> laura: aoc plus three were fun to watch. >> did you watch them laugh during the hearing? >> laura: sheila jackson lee is actually talking about

casualties. i will give her credit, she was talking with potential for casualties, and the other ones are laughing in the background. >> on 9/11, some people did some things, remember what she said about 9/11? >> laura: i already have a stomach ache. if i heard that again, i would go right off the edge. congressman, raymond arroyo's segment coming up. >> oh, sorry. trump's speech on iran today, we talked about it, i think it was a master stroke, and he is getting praise from some of his critics. near times columnist ian bremmer tweeted this. "i'm far from a trump supporter, but impossible not to call iran outcome a win for u.s. president and a big opportunity going forward." here to debate this, dan bongino,ar and fox news contributor, also with me, chriss hahn, former aide to senator chuck sumer and host of the aggressive progressive podcast. what is the left line supposed to be now, that trump just kind of got lucky here? he fell into a position of

restraint? >> i think we are all glad that the president stepped back from the brink of the war that he almost started himself. p he alone started this war, and he alone stepped back from the brink. and you know what? i'm happy about that. i'm glad he came to that rational in conclusion, let's move forward. i don't think i would say it is a master stroke of speech. i hope and i pray that they do come to the table and we do work out an agreement. i even given the president credit if he did. however, we did havede an agreement, and we weren't ate this posture with iran under this agreement. in fact, when we be pulled away from the agreement, that the hostilities with iran ramped up, and it donald trump alone who pulled us out of the agreement. >> laura: susan rice,ne dan, mentioned the same issue that chris was talking about, about the iran deal today, watch. >> president trump came out, his he first words are iran won't get a

bomb, a nuclear weapon on my watch. they weren't going to get a nuclear weapon on anybody's watch, had the president adhered to the nuclear deal. >> laura: a case of amnesia, dan? explain this for our viewers. >> i'm trying to parse what was sillier, susan rice's comments, or chris's. let me start with susan rice's. first, someone should have notified someone there was the iran deal, because they did little to stop the advance of their nuclear program, as the israelis kindly pointed out to us, and as chris knows, he may not, i'm not sure how much reading he did on wikipedia before the show, but the iran deal had a provision, we had to get the iranians permission to inspect military facilities. i'm sure the iranians are going to let us and give us permission to inspect facilities where they may be producing nuclear weapons they are not supposed to be producing. it was a nonsensical deal. secondly, chris's point was

really so silly, i don't know what he even said it. heis said president trump, we've got to give him credit for not getting into a war that he tried to start? what are you even talking about? president trump ran and made a point of getting us out of unnecessary war is. he said he wanted topo de-escalate -- >> he did. >> he did, in turn, de-escalate the situation. why take a cheap shot? that is just silly, your point makes no sense. >> laura: let me get into a moment of last night -- you can address them in the answer to this. last night, we were talking about how to inform the public as to what was happening. we were trying to report all of the news coming in during our hour, and it was always fast and furious, but last night on msnbc, they were actually takina the iranians words for what happened on the ground. check it out. >> iran state media is claiming that u.s. soldiers have been killed in this attack. now, this is not confirmed.

>> talking about leveling al-assad air base. >> saying they have leveled in al-assad base in iraq and have killed 30 u.s. troops. >> laura: why are repeating this propaganda of iran in a moment of concern for the nation? >> i don't condone that, i think the time of war and hostility, we should confirm things before we report them, and we should definitely not taking the word of iranian state media. i am not here at all saying the iranians are good actors. i am saying that we have guardrails in the united states that the president of the united states needs congress to authorize the kind of force that he used last week, killing the iranian general. and i think, you talk to the leader about the war powers act resolution coming before the house and the senate, and when you listen to mike lee today, and what hed was saying, i thik that is going to have a little juice, not only in the house, but also the senate, controlled by republicans. >> laura: mike lee's thoughts on this are a total outlier.

i like mike and he is a smart guy, but the idea that the president makes the call that there is an imminent threat to the united states, we have a chance to take out someone responsible for literally hundreds of deaths, american soldiers -- everything they were doing, the fact that he did thai ts a good thing for our soldiers, the victims of all that violence. dan, americans should be celebrating the death of soleimani, not wondering, what if we had waited 30 days for a resolution, or nancy pelosi okayed it? i think that is a joke constitutionally. >> that's the constitution! >> laura: first of all, talk to george washington about what he would think an imminent threat to the united states as determined bye the chief executive officer -- >> he didn't prove imminent. okay, dan, go ahead. >> let's do a quick principles check on chris, because i guarantee chris was nowhere when

obama was droning people in syria, what was it, 571 times? he's only upset -- >> you must not have been watching fox. you must not have watched fox during the obama administration, i was highly critical of obama and his droning program.t if you watch the network you work for, you would know that. >> laura: great seeing you. all right, despite the overwhelming media admiration for pelosi's impeachment plan, as we talked about, has totally flopped. two vets of the clinton impeachment will tell us why. plus, house intel republicans, devin nunes is here with exclusive insight, next. ♪

♪ >> there will be no haggling with the house over senate procedure. we will not cede our authority to try this impeachment pick of the democratic leader does not need to continue to be enthralled to the speaker. he does not need to keep colluding with outside efforts to supplant the judgment of his own colleagues. stand up for our institution. stand up for the country. >> laura: at what point does mcconnell just say enough? at what point does he change the a trial, start regardless of whether or not pelosi sends the articles of impeachment? to answer that, that question and a lot more, two experts on the subject. bob barr, former clinton impeachment, and sol wisenberg, former whitewater independentbj counsel. how easy would it be, or not be, i've been hearing differing responses to this question, to change the impeachment rules? does it require 67, or a simple majority?

>> it's just the rules. the senate can do that anytime it wantsan to. what moves all of this is simply the rule -- under its current -- rules, the senate moves forward with setting up the rules for an impeachment, or the trial itself, until the managers have been o appointed and the documes delivered to the senate. all the senate has to do is change that, and they can do it pretty much any time. >> laura: last night, i think i was talking to ted cruz over in the makeup room, and he said need 67 votes to change the rules in the senate. h he's a pretty smart guy, and he says it's not that easy. your thoughts? >> well, the current rules for impeachment do say that you need 67 votes to change the rules. my point is a little different. i interpret the current rules as here is what we do when we get articles of impeachment exhibited to us by the house. there are no rules for what

happens when the house and -- and peaches the president, which they have, and they don't bring anything over and exhibit the articles of impeachment. in my opinion, what are called the impeachment rules in the senate don't cover the situation we are in, and i believe they could establish new rules by majority vote and say this is what we are going to do in this situation, unprecedented, and we are going to move forward. >> laura: in other words, it's better for them to do it now, to act now, before they send to the articles over, if they ever, correct? so you need a threshold. >> well, once you send the articles over, you don't have to worry about yve changing the ru. the limit they have, speaker pelosi is pulling this maneuver that is very unserious and very dangerous and really shows that she doesn't take in this process seriously at all -- >> laura: all right, i want to -- okay, i want to move on. the democrats, i think they found themselves, maybe a

brand-new talking point. >> the idea of the clinton precedent, which is really not applicable here, if we had a clinton precedent to apply here, all of the witnesses will testify, even before the trial begins. mitch mcconnell is being very selective in the application of the clinton precedent. >> theis clinton trial was very different. they are saying it was the same rules, but all of those people had alreadyy testified. >> laura: bob barr, is that all correct? >> this is nonsense! none of those people testified hearings, impeachment this is another example of how the democrats, in their zeal to go after trump, care nothing about precedent, nothing about the truth, nothing about the rules, and what is happening here, the danger moving forward, laura, goes far beyond simply this impeachment. it shows the american people that the democrat party and the speaker of the house of representatives don't care of

-- about rules and you can make it up as you go along. >> laura: senator graham, elslindsey graham, is thinking f crafting -- well, he's crafted a resolution calling out for pelosi to send the articles of impeachment to the senate. it's a flagrant violation of the separation of powers, and he calls on the speaker to immediately appoint managers and send impeachment to the senate. it's a nice sentiment by lindsey, but doesn't really have any sway whatsoever? >> i don't think it gets us anywhere, and i don't think it's a flagrant violation of the separation of powers. ihi don't like it, but let's fae it, the constitution says the house has the sole power of impeachment, the senate has the hesole power to try it. nothing in the constitution says nancy has to send was over. so i prefer the option of the senate just saying he's been impeached, i mean, speaker pelosi said the articles passed, she banged her gavel, so he's been impeached.

we don't have to wait for them. it's not h like an indictment. we don't have to wait for them to send it over. we've given them a decent amount of time to send it over, they aren't doing it. let's create a new set of rules for the situation and let's have a trial. >> laura: or call it a default judgment, but that doesn't vindicate the president. the president needs to be vindicated and have this thing acquitted. >> speaker mcconnell needs to find out how they handle it, because it is the president's legacy on the line, not mcconnell's, not schumer's, not pelosi's. >> are republicans tonight closer to uncovering a new deep state conspiracy? there is, at this hour, an active investigation going on in the intelligence community inspector general for his handling of the ukraine whistle-blower complaint. house intel republicans have serious concerns -- and they should -- over inconsistencies in michael atkinson's closed-door impeachment

testimony. i would show you excerpts of it, ifso i could, but adam schiff refuses to release it. of the 18 closed-door impeachment interviews, it's so curious that atkinson's is the only one being withheld. the question is why? here now is house intel ranking member devin nunes. congressman, was he hiding? >> what he's hiding is very simple,co the origins of this ae shady and don't make sense.. from the time the whistle-blower came forward to the ig, didn't have any first-hand knowledge, the form letter changed, was backdated, things we had to hear from the whistle-blower and then didn't have to hear from the whistle-blower, and the media and democrats hoping we forgot about -- it's kind of funny this is no news, but at the time, we have the letters right here, in my hand, we sent a letter,

september 30th, to the ig. he responded in an inadequate way on october 8th, and we said look, rightt now, we have to focus on this impeachment, but this strategy, we are going to come back to this. he knew we weren't happy with the response, so we will be sending him a new letter this week, give him another week to respond. i will tell you, someone is not telling the truth here, and that's why they don't want this testimony out. >> laura: can the senate do anything here?e? >> they could call the ig in,n, but the question will be these transcripts. they need to be released to the public, and why are these the only transcripts not out? >> laura: it's interesting to see figures rushing to atkinson's defense. watch. o >> atkinson did, the best i could tell, exactly what he was supposed to do that comported with the law, and the whistle-blower complaint -- himself or herself complied

meticulously with the law. >> well, the law, if you believe this or not, there is no such thing as the law. they are trying to claim this was the case, and yet the formss didn't show that. and then, only when questioned by the media did the form get ff changed, and got backdated. if it wouldn't have been us for asking the questions originally, they would have gotten away with it. >> laura: it's a different set of facts. you do the same thing when it came to the mueller investigation. you were pressing and pressing and pressing, and then they started vilifying you. >> if they think i'm going to go away, i'm not. >> laura: you didn't before. it's dejank vu all over again. >> they might think because i don't have subpoena poweror that there's going to be some issue, but we do have other powers. we can run this investigation and get other people to come in and testify. we do have people that come in as whistle-blowers and talk to us, right, or informants that

talk to us. if i was the ig, i would provide all of the documentation. you have to either believe he is in on it or he is incompetent, okay? if he's incompetent -- that's what he's claiming in the letter, essentially, we are incompetent.t.e' we have all of these mistakes. we need to have evidence of your incompetence. that's all we ask for in the letter, provide us all the documentation that shows how this got changed. we are not going to take your word for it, oh, we made a mistake. >> laura: do we know how many times schiff's office met with the whistle-blower? do we really know? >> we assume multiple times. they likely know the whistle-blower, several staff members newly whistle-blower. >> laura: congressman, we will stay on this, thank you for staying on this for the american people. coming up, squad member ilhan omar sympathizes with the enemy -- shocker. a royal falling out, some climate change goes up in smoke. raymond arroyo with "seen and unseen" next. a lot ofe in my truck.

it's my livelihood. ♪ rock music >> man: so i'm not taking any chances when something happens to it. so when my windshield cracked... my friend recommended safelite autoglass. >> tech: hi, i'm adrian. >> man: thanks for coming. >> tech: oh, no problem. >> tech: check it out. >> man: yeah. they came right to me, with expert service where i needed it. that's service i can trust... no matter what i'm hauling. right, girl? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪

♪ ♪ >> laura: it's time for our "seen and unseen" segment, we expose the big cultural stories t'of the day. congresswoman ilhan omar, a royal shake up, and climate change fanatics flameout, again. joining us as raymond arroyo. squad member ilhan omar is at it again, at a pressure today about the iranians attacks on the u.s. airbase in iraq, she said this. >> i feel ill, a little bit,

because of everything that is taking place, and i think every time i hear about -- i hear conversations around war, i find myself being stricken with ptsd. since we got into office, the president of the united states has been goading around into war.t this is a man who is both in arsonist and a fireman. he starts a crisis, then he wants to create the appearance of wanting to solve it. >> she would know, laura. judicial watch has filed several ethics complaints against her, and it looks like omar is actually the arsonist. she gets ptsd about a strike on a terrorist mastermind, but today at the press conference, when discussion a turned to american casualties in iraq, he or she is giggling, and gossiping.en look at her.

laughing her head off with her little pals. worst of all, in a tweet last night, she seemed to offer iran suggestions on targets they might consider striking. she wrote "trump needs to immediately divest with his businesses and comply with the emoluments clause. iran could threaten trump hotels worldwide and he could provoke war over the loss of revenue from skittish guests. his business interests should not be driving our military." i don't see how the business decisions or driving anything, but to signal out, to point out a private enterprise is really outrageous, and to side with a regime like iran. speaking of switching alliances, laura, it appears that harry and meghan markle -- prince harry -- they dropped a blistering announcement on instagram todayt stating they intend to step back as senior members of the royal family.ta >> laura: no! >> and work to become financially independent. "work to become." this comes after months of public wrestling with how difficult it is to fit in with the royal family and with harry

claiming he and his brother william are different paths. theyil responded, the discussios with the duke and duchessia of sussex are at an early stage. these are complicated issues that will take time to work through. i'll bet. you can imagine the reaction in the u.k. was not warm. we were there -- you were there. >> laura: hearing you do that voice of the queen him it was like she was going to hit meghan with her purse. >> this was the reaction of the u.k. watch, royal watchers. >> it's okay to move away, but i think it's not being done in a very tactful, nice, kind, thought out. >> do you know the problem is, laura? the prince formally known as harry, he and meghan see themselves as ace kind of brand, they want to be their own brand.

they hang out with serena williams and are jet-setting withey amal clooney. how that helps the media stay away from you, i don't understand, but that is their argument here. my guess, this is going to look like season 4 of "the crown,"," hollywood days. >> laura: i also think it is kind of -- it's a very self-possessed. if you want to do that, fine, but they are doing it, and the way they did it, is kind of a flick off of the whole thing. and it's also insulting to the longest reigning monarch in worldng history. >> they are using the title to advance themselves, and by the way, they are plotting a global initiative, their own charity. how do you think it is going to be financially? >> the private jets that fund of the charity. celebrities in the media have been pressing the narrative that the wildfires in australia are caused by climate change people change. the golden globes, nightly news, et cetera, it's the same story.

watch. >> climate change is front and center in australia. >> fully aware there is climate change underway. australia is the only first world country in the world that is dealing with climate impacts of the scale. >> people are looking at australia and climate change, saying somebody has to do s something about climate change. it's urgent they're. >> this is incomplete reporting, laura.me australia has had the highest -- the driest season ever. it's not correct to say climate change caused these wildfires. they've taken legal action is 180 people who lit fires or discarded a match on land. there is a complicated story here, and the media only wants to report one half of it. "seen and unseen," indeed. now you know the whole story. >> laura: i feel bad with all of the animals and the people who lost their homes. >> it's a terrible story. >> laura: it makes w you just cry. thank you, raymond. if you thought the democrats looked impotent against trump before the events of last week, wait until we take you through the reactions to iran.

the 2020 commander inun chief tt next.

looking to get your business off to a fast start in the new year? it's go time! switch to comcast business and get fast internet on the nation's largest gig-speed network. plus, complete reliability with 4g lte backup.

and, cloud-based security to help protect the devices on your network. greenlight your business in 2020 with fast internet and voice for $64.90 per month. switch now and get a $100 prepaid card when you add comcast business securityedge. call today. comcast business. beyond fast.

♪ >> >> by removing soleimani, we have sent a powerful message to terrorists. if you value your own life, you will not threaten the lives of our people. y >> laura: that was president trump handling a crisis with iran. he seemed to pass the commander in chief test with flying colors, i might add, but how do the 2020 democrat rivals stack up? here to help us score the democrat field reaction to iran as tom bevan, cofounder and presidentea of real clear politics, along with scott rasmussen, polestar, and authorr of the new book "the sun is still rising."

gentlemen, let's get started. first up is elizabeth warren's response to iranian aggression. >> we cannot solve nonmilitary problems using the military. we have to understand the full range of tools. we have to have a sophisticatedo approach to the rest of the world. people have to believe that our first responsepr is not going to be to try to move us toward war. >> laura: tom, isn't this a little t disingenuous from warr, when trump said he doesn't want any further conflict? >> yeah, of all of the candidates in the democratic field, i think elizabeth warren handled this the worst, she initially called so the money a murderer and had to walk that back after being called out on twitter. and then calling him a senior official, has been able to bring herself to call them bad guy who deserves what he got. she's really handled this, of all of the candidates, the worst.e > laura: all right, scott, here's michael bloomberg's take on trump's handling of all of this.

>> in any crisis, it's imperative that the commander in chief think through all of his decisions and not not act rashly or recklessly, but as we all know, that is not in his nature. >> laura: it gets better, in an interview with "the washington post," bloomberg also suggested that maybe an emergency phone line should be installed so irani and american officials can easily get in touch, like the hotline that connected the kremlin after the cuban missile crisis. technology has advanced. >> it's changed a little bit since that era. >> laura: what is this with bloomberg?an >> that was like a batting practice pitch for the president. the president is prepared for something along the lines of all of the experts they that i should deal from a position of weakness, i should appease our enemies and not offend anybody,

and the president will say i stood up for america. i took this action because we had a bad actor, a chance to take out instead of hundreds of americans, many of our allies, the talk coming from the other side is not going to cut it with swing voters. >> laura: tom, bernie sanders also sounded off. watch. >> i think it was an assassination. i think it was a violation of international law. all we have to do is name these people terrace, call them what we want, andnd we can assassinae them. >> laura: sticking up for good old guy soleimani, tom. >> listen, here is the thing. even though the majority of americans supported the strike against soleimani, a 68% -- 2 out of 3 democrats -- disapproved of it, including half of democrats strongly disapproved of it. here is bernie saying what most democrats are thinking, and he

has the benefit of being authentic and antiwar. that's resonating with voters. >> laura: don't know how it will play in the battleground states. joe biden has also weighed in on iran, tweeting late tonight, "i'm thankful no one was hurt in last night's attack, but we're onlyat in this mess because donald trump pulled outl of the iran deal, so instead of using his statements today to lay out a coherent strategy on iran, he used it to mislead the country on the obama-biden record. he's been president for three years, it's time he stops blaming president obama for his failures." >> i'm not sure i would take that but with you on the democratic nomination. with a larger picture here is no matter which democrat wins the nomination, they are acting from a positionot of weakness. and it's true on this foreign policy issue, it's true on

economic record right now. >> laura: they are back on their heels. all right, thank you so much, great to see you. a big announcement about the next two nights. stay there.a ..

>> man: what's my safelite story?

i spend a lot of time in my truck. it's my livelihood.

♪ rock music >> man: so i'm not taking any chances when something happens to it. so when my windshield cracked... my friend recommended safelite autoglass. >> tech: hi, i'm adrian. >> man: thanks for coming. >> tech: oh, no problem. >> tech: check it out. >> man: yeah. they came right to me, with expert service where i needed it. that's service i can trust... no matter what i'm hauling. right, girl? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ ♪ >> laura: all right, a huge programming announcement. >> a huge programming announcement, two big exclusives over the next treatment, tomorrow mike pompeo will be

here with reaction, criticism and congress over the briefing on capitol hill and friday night, donald trump will sit down with me for a wide-ranging interview on iran, in >>, china, immigration, a lot more. you will want to watch the next two nights and "fox and friends" will have mike pence on but for now shannon bream and the fox news at night team. have a great show. shannon: fox news alert. a military response, invoking new sanctions against iran for the missile attack for forces in iraq, and taking aim at the obama administration saying that helps with the attack. is the truth to that statement. nancy pelosi continuing to put forward