we will never be the media, raged,se hate trump mob. for the impeachment. they could have subpoenaed bolton and boa the votes would e expedited the schedule. let not your heart be troubled. on that question, i believe history will show in the whole laura ingraham standing by to take it away.democrats were idea of upholding it for the last two weeks will show she made a lot of tactical and strategical mistakes. all in all, sheal was not a obsessed with ripping trump out serious person. the judgment of history on her will be devastating. of office. what they are stooping to now >> laura: you're being very really is an all-time low. charitable. owtheir back on the russia red that's why we love to have you scare with his "new york times" on the show. your the charitable guest on the absurdity that came out today. it's a complete joke. panel. really quickly, bob barr, the it's actually embarrassing. democrats are already looking at some point it's just past the impeachment vote to do embarrassing for them. >> sean: they haven't done anything for the american more russia people. they're supposed to serve. public servants. when you serve, i was a waiter, i would serve for the clientele. watch. >> laura: we work for them. >> when this process is all we work to pay their sedan. over, the committee and intelligence will continue to weli the people work for the investigate this president from all the issues relating to the oppression investigation, government. that is how the democrats see

it. trump sees it the other way including money laundering. around. you had a great show. tiwant the public to know that i'm looking forward to next the investigation of this week. president, the desire to hold you and i are going to tag team him accountable will continue. it. >> laura: i hadn't heard money laundering before.e it's going to bean fun. i heard extortion and bribery. >> sean: i'm thinking about doing a segment, everybody always likes these handoffs. everything else. i'm like, why doesn't laura do a segment every week? i'd not heard that in a while. we can hash it out longer. final thought? you can make fun of me like you >> what they're doing here is usually do. >> laura: you do me the same courtesy andak go once a week on their further eroding the entire my show. process of the intelligence committee, which ought to be involved in a serious oversight. >> sean: there always has to it has no credibility whatsoever.mm be a quid pro quo. they've done great damage to >> laura: you finally discovered the quid pro quo. that process as well to the >> sean: the real quid pro constitutional process of quo. impeachment. like joe. >> laura: dismiss this now. >> laura: this is i have to make t-shirts. "the ingraham angle." i'll send each of you one. nancy finally, finally makes her gentlemen, thank you. coming up, where is hunter? glacial move. mitch mcconnell hinted he moments my angle examines what might be interested in callingme the senate should do next. our expert legal panel latest on hunter biden as a witness in the senate trial. democrats want witnesses, they everything you need to know want witnesses. devin nunes joins us to discuss about the upcoming trial. what that next. will and what won'tal

and a forgotten witness the surprise you. we have breaking news. heart of impeachment. we just got our hands on it. tonight, mitch mcconnell opens the door calling hunter biden in ♪ >> man: what's my safelite story? front of the senate trial. what about the whistle-blower? we will ask that question. devin nunes has answers. more breaking news, this time on mike flynn. we have new details. more russian hysteria is coming your way as i mentioned to hannity, democrats and the resistance media are foaming at the mouth over this new russia hacking controversy. we are digging into the real truth and the sources there. laura logan is here. first, dismiss the madness. that is the focus of tonight's angle. nearly a month after the house passed two lame articles of impeachment against president trump, nancy pelosi finally, finally announced urgent case needed to be slowly transmitted to the senate.

>> he abused his power and obstructed a constitutionally instructed impeachment inquiry. in america, no one is above the law. the next step is simple, the senate should conduct a fair trial. >> laura: he is not biased. the slow roll of her articles, that itself speaks volumes about these absurdities of this entire exercise. when pressed aboutum why she decided to send the articles despite zero concessions from mcconnell, senior members of her own party struggled to move beyond gibberish. >> she thought very carefully about this with the conjunction of the committee chairs. you know, she'll make her case and proceed forward. >> laura: can i buy a vowel please?

i'm not seeing how that answers the question. the senate majority leader is clearly in the driver's seat. i spend a lot of time in my truck. >> the house majority thinks political anamiss have started it's my livelihood. this with frivolity. it will fall to the senate, to ♪ rock music the senate to end it with >> man: so i'm not taking any chances when something happens to it. so when my windshield cracked... seriousness and sobriety. my friend recommended safelite autoglass. >> tech: hi, i'm adrian. >> laura: he is right. >> man: thanks for coming. >> tech: oh, no problem. the senate is not beholden to >> tech: check it out. >> man: yeah. the lower chamber and they came right to me, with expert service determining trial procedures. where i needed it. anymore than they senate can dictate with the house does. that's service i can trust... nancy pelosi knows this. no matter what i'm hauling. right, girl? it's all a farce. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ from beginning to end. mcconnell, frankly has been a beacon of clarity for weeks. raising the requirements of the constitutional questions at every turn. he's repeatedly demonstrated how absurd and have seen this entire ukraine impeachment was from the start. today mcconnell gave the as a doctor, i agree with cdc guidance. appearance, kind of holding a i recommend topical pain relievers first... door open to witnesses at the like salonpas patch large. it's powerful, fda-approved to relieve moderate pain, senate trial.

>> we will be dealing with the yet non-addictive and gentle on the body. witness issue at the appropriate salonpas. it's good medicine. time. hisamitsu. into the trial. i think it certainly appropriate to point out that both sides would want to call witnesses that they would want to hear from. >> laura: you see the trick going on there. as i said last night, he has the power to add to this nightmare. he could in his opening resolution tomorrow include a motion to dismiss the fraudulent articleses of impeachment. the facts, the law, and the constitutional requirement. an actual trial is only necessary if preceded by a legitimate indictment. that didn't happen here. the process and the house was infected by partisan tanks and effected legal arguments. first the house failed to make their case under applicable law. the constitution clearly states a person can only be impeached for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. herech none of that was established. there was o no underlying crime. >> this would be the first

impeachment and history where there would be considerable debate, and in my view now compelling evidence of the commission of a crime. >> laura: the two articles filed against the president are deficient. the first, abuse of power is just totally made out.an ♪ -- up. >> i would love to have the according to the radicals and whistle-blower who wrote a fake their parties, the president is abusing his power every time he report.he enforces, let's say immigration i want to know what happened to law.ry the second whistle-blower. what happened to the informer? they all disappeared. they are saying that all the time. he can't do this, he is abusing when i gave the transcript. his power, would that count as an article of impeachment? >> laura: i lost track of how many whistle-blowers, informants. the president raise some great points with my exclusive you see how wide berth this is? interview with him on friday. what happened to the person who the president acted squarely launched this entire sham? with his article one powers in his telephone conversation with the connection to adam schiff. ukrainian president. ukrainian president said he felt how many connections are there no pressure,n no quid pro quo. this is why the democrats with adam schiff? abandon their talk of the quid why haven't we heard from the pro quo and of course all the whistle-blower? other stuff they were throwing they don't get any special in the kitchen sink, extortion, immunity. you name it. >> there are a number of events if you thought that, you were

you are investigating for which wrong. joining me now is devin nunes. ranking member of the house until committee. congressman, is a senate going i cannot bring any first-hand to try the president? knowledge. take a vote in this removal in >> what i can do for you here the office with such murky today is to tell you what i origins? heard from people. >> you have no testimony today how did it get this far? that ties president trump to a >> they've been hell-bent to impeach for three years. scheme to withhold aid from your last panel, the guests were ukraine in exchange for these talking about -- former investigations. congressman bob barr, they've >> other than my own presumption. >> which is nothing! ruined and stepped all over the >> laura: that's my favorite constitution. they've also grew to the house of all. the second of obstruction of intelligence committee. at somer point i would like toe able to come on the show and talk about the work that people congress is even more legitimate sent me here to do. if that's possible. now we will impeach presidents to serve on the committee, where who exercise their rights to observe privileges or otherwise we deal with trade issues and defend their executive authority? all the important issues people care about. w that's going to be interesting. from day one adam schiff and >> laura: how about china? a country that's military is on company made it clear that they wouldn't go to court to enforce the verge of being larger than subpoenas, what does that tell ours. that's ahi threat. you. a no confidence in their case. they claimed there was no time. they pointed to the urgency of the matter. that's a threat to the we had to stop trump, he was united states. >> the republicans, we had an going to do it again. investigation going into china and we still do. we've had virtually no hearings remember all that? whatsoever. it was like, hurry up and wait

for an entire month. >> laura: they are not interested in governing. they're interested in the they're going to any impeachment removal of the presidents. t articles to the senate. if anybody should be charged that's it. with abuse of power, it pelosi and schiff. now, i >> if you impeach a president, want to play something for you. this is tammy baldwin when the issue was raised of hunter biden. speaking of witnesses that we if you make a high crime and have not heard from, misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. watch. >> the idea for a trial is to it's your abuse of power. you are doing precisely what have witnesses who have knowledge about the articles of impeachment that had been sent over or will be sent over from you're criticizing the presidenp the house. it's abuse of power. it's obstruction of congress. for doing. >> laura: the politics of this impeachment stink to high heaven hunter biden really has no and they always have. bearing on those things. democrats didn't get a single >> laura: no relevance. republican to vote for it. not one!e! >> clearly he has relevance the framers made it very clear that impeachment had to be bipartisan to be legitimate. along with all the democratic operatives who were doing exactly what they accuse trump the underlying conduct had to be of doing. they were in ukraine digging up egregious. dirt on trump. >> hamilton in federal 65's have you ask about -- about the greatest danger is for adam schiff, what is he doing? impeachment to turn on how many he needs to testify. votes one party can have against everyone's guess tomorrow is the other party. that is exactly what happened. that he will be one of the managers that will be in ao senate try to prosecute this

it would be ideal if we had case. impeachments that were neutral, objected, bipartisan. >> laura: he walks over to the in this case it doesn't rise to that level in any sense. witness, is there a witness stand? >> laura: it shouldn't be i don't even know how it will treated as legitimate either. democrats used to agree that look. hold on, let me put down this impeachment should be driven microphone and go on the other fully by one party. side. >> he needs to answer questions because he is the fact witness. >> we are here today because the he's the one that first had interactions with the whistle-blower. republicans and the house are you take on top of this -- paralyzed with hatred.er > laura: he said he is not a fact witness.. he was on "the view" today. until the republicans free themselves of this hatred, our i know you saw it when you were country will suffer. >> history is going to question sitting there with bonbonske whether or not this is just a partisan lynching or whether or watching "the view." watch what he said. not it was something that in >> would you, if asked to come up to testify if you are subpoenaed? >> i'm not a fact witness, so t fact met the standards. the very high bar. >> laura: back then, biden i'm not sure why the senate would call me or nancy pelosi as a witness. actually members were he was. what happened? >> of course he's a witness. donald trump happens, that's what. they get away with this because that memberstime the media is letting them get away with it. we don't know how this of congress start earning their paycheck. we face a wide array of whistle-blower ever came to be. we find out new things all the challenges that need the time. president's undivided attention. we just found out the other day iran, infrastructure, the

skyrocketing cost of health care still. that mary mccord, the former this is all a dangerous distraction mcconnell should doj personnel had been advised in the democrats. call it out as such. we did know about that. mitt romney and the other folks who are wobbly, mitt romney has >> laura: we got these notes the opportunity to be a hero of scribble scrabble, there ia a notepad and were supposed to say, the democrats have a here. smoking gun. i said hero. this is nothing. he had a handful of the other wavering republicanhe senators it's not even dated. have the power to preserve the legitimacy and the check of impeachment. >> who was adam schiff hanging allowing new witnesses into the out with? process at this point, it only empowers the partisans that began this madness from the beginning! the constitutional deficiency is obvious on its face. i parnas. he has been indicted on serious think romney knows that. it's imperative that they stop federal crimes. they been in negotiations to get this guy a deal, some type of a nullification. remember, this guy has lied the democratic senators itching about me. he's lied to -- about us several for a a show trial. times. he's lied about our staff. this is not someone who is a allowing this impeachment to go credible witness for anything. forward only serves to set a >> laura: michael flynn has poisonous precedent for future commanders in chief. withdrawn his guilty plea due to long after trump is gone. the government's breach of his agreement. this is a time for the g.o.p. to

stand together. what else can you tell us? just like they did in the face >> we knew from earlyre on in 27 of the brett kavanaugh smears. lending any t legitimacy to the that michael flynnfr did not lie houses acidic article would burn to the fbi. a hole through the constitution and frankly, the senate's we actually put that in our reports. it didn't come out until 2018. there were several of us as legacy. witnesses. we also told the highest level of the doj that we had been and that's "the ankle." briefed by the fbi that he joining me now is bob barr, didn't live to the fbi. former house impeachment manager along with saul wisemenberg. john eastman, claremont institute senior fellow and >> laura: didn't peter strzok constitutional scholar. come out of that meeting with we have a lot to get to tonight. flynn? fox news is concerned, confirming that mitch mcconnell met today with he didn't think you lied? g.o.p. senators to discuss trial strategies including the idea of witness reciprocity with >> interesting you said that. there is interesting democrats. documentation we never received. to add further than that -- i want to make sure everybody understands this. we put into our report and some basically, will trade you a of the things that general flynn saying, withdrawing, he hunter biden for a john bolton. saying he's been treated unfairly. john, is this kind of a cutesy game? remember, we put this in a mitch mcconnell is very smart, he knows the procedure better report in 2018 and for some reason it was redacted. than anybody on the hill. knowing democrats will never allow hunter biden or schiff to we had to fight for a couple of testify. months to get that unredacted.

>> i think so, but if were going we are witnesses here -- we were to go forward it would be from those to hear briefed by the fbi that flynn folks. didn't lie. we have enough evidence to be here it was collusion months before the call to set this up. i just don't see -- some of us we have enough evidence to know need to speak on his behalf. hunter biden was in a sweetheart deal getting money. the fbi should have this information. we heard from your opening >> laura: vindictive prosecution withholding monologue, they keep saying evidence. nobody is above the law. that would include hunter biden and joe biden. it makes a perfectly legitimate that's a real no-no. for the presidential look into that deal. along with fudging stuff at the all of these things ought to be on the table. the whole scandal where, where fisa court. there seems to be a pattern of misbehavior. >> we alerted the fbi. it is illegitimate for the >> laura: you had a lot in your reports. congressman, thank you for president to ask for foreign coming in tonight. keep it up for flynn. help and investigation of u.s. distance, where they talk about and coming up, 14 days in 2020 and russia hysteria is back. the obama administration my mini angle explains that and investigation of paul manafort? the use of the fbi to spy on the trump campaign? then lara logan joins us to dismantle the latest red scare. this f whole charade is designed stay right there. to provide cover and hide that most phenomenal, political ♪

scandal in american history. >> laura: an impeachment trial is not going to get to the bottom of anyy that. [confetti cannon popping] energizer. that's just wishful thinking. backed by science. matched by no one. going back to my ankle, saul. you are wit and wisdom is required here. what about mcconnell including a motion to dismiss in that opening resolution? even if they don't vote on it right away. i know you think that happened in impeachment if my memory serves me correctly. saul. >> if they entertain a motion to impeach, sorry a motion to dismiss. either on the theory that the impeachment articles on their face do not allege an impeachable crime. or on the theory that we've looked at all the evidence from the house and that does improve an impeachable crime. if they decide to dismiss on those grounds, i believe that under the case of nixon, that is walter and not richard. the supreme court cannot question that.

in other words it's a political question the supreme court will not second guess. my first answer to your question is, there is no doubt the senate can do this. that that will be considered a trial. there supreme court said, we don't know if something's a trial or not. that's up to the senate alone. >> laura: interesting. i knew i would get a good answer from you.en bob barr, you've been through this before. what are your thoughts here about this idea of expanding this out. we have supposedly new documents that the democrats are dropping into the senate tomorrow regardingts scribble scrabble oa notepad that's not dated. how does that all play into this process? >> it's more nonsense from a process that has given usoc nothing but nonsense. they're to resuscitate a body that died a long time ago over

in the house night. your idea of having a motion to dismiss, it is so obviously the right thing to do for the republicans that one wonders why there is all of this dilly dallying around. by some of the republicans. it takes a majority vote. they have more than the majority. get it over with. if the democrats want to try and take it to the courts and have the court slapped her hand, that's fine. the senate has the power and the majority ought to do the right thing for once. >> laura: i have to agree. this entire thing of, should we call hunter? you called him in a senate committee. they could call him tomorrow. in a senate committee hearing. this idea that we will negotiate and romney will do this, schiff -- this is a joke. this is terrible for the future of our country. it might be good for us, we will have gangbusters ratings next

week. i'm saying something against my own personal interest. i probably shouldn't say this, but it is. it's bad for the country, terrible for the country. >> as you pointed out in your opening monologue, the claims of obstruction of congress for the president,t, asserting his righs as an executive, he doesn't work for the congress. this is not a parliamentary system. he has his own independent authority from the constitution. what thehe house of representatives, second article of impeachment is trying to upset that balance and shift power away from the executive. we have a unitary executive for a very important reason. it started to threaten the entire infrastructure of our constitutional system. >> laura: whenon we read the reporting about nancy pelosi calling mitch mcconnell, a russian asset. i'm paraphrasing. that is what she said. she said, he has kremlin

connections. going along with the far left hashtag that's been flying around twitter. that speaks to the underlying rot here. this is a partisan attack, the extension of the failed mueller probe and they're trying to go back and get him out of office. i think her comments alone tanked. >> i believe when the history of this is looked at, speaker pelosi is not going to look very good. >> laura: the democrats tried mightily to use fake anti-russia the reason for that, hysteria, only to flame out senator mcconnell, i don't always agree with him but i spectacularly. think he hit the nail on the head. they did not take this process seriously. now they're at it again if you when you impeach a president, can believe it. on sunday speaker pelosi it's serious. you don't get up one day hold a wonderedf if mcconnell is an press conference and say, we are accomplice with russia. now doing impeachment. you pass a resolution that says today she was back added, reportedly telling her were going to do an impeachment colleagues in a private meeting inquiry. if you do it early enough to let that she wondered if mcconnell has kremlin connections. people go to the courts and see if they have to testify. d of course the press happily they could have joins in and they relentlessly

fan the flames of this new red scare. now they think they have a new in. yesterday's "new york times" reported, russian military hackers have been boring into the ukrainian gas company at the center of the impeachment affair. according to security experts. you might wonder, who are these security experts? it turns out, it's a company called area one. cofounded by oren falcowitz. also the "washington examiner" reporting that area one is working with the campaigns of 2020 democrats. what? somehow the paper record failed to mention those insignificant details. a conflict of interest maybe. work on them totally unimportant.nsns either way, it's embarrassing. forget this antiquated idea of checking sources. potential conflicts before you run with a story.

liberal pundits were all too happy to run back to russia. >> russia have played this game before and 2016. are we seeing the groundwork being laid for the same thing? >> the russians are doing the same thing over again. >> they will function as a super pack. not just a trump campaign, but a hostile actor as well. >> this will be a factor in this election. >> this is a redo of that election. just delete hillary and put in biden and it is the equivalent of wikileaks. >> laura: that diagram. i would like to state that i personally -- if i had to bet the farm on it, if i had a farm, i don't believe any of these details. at least not as their laid out. especially considering the source. this looks a lot like a planted story meant to pre-spin the 2020 election and maybe even provide cover for joe biden should any

inconvenient details come out. if they come out they can say, it's russia. let's consider for a moment the worst-case scenario, that the russians did hack burisma. all it proves is that, hunter biden should never have gotten involved with a corrupt company. susceptible to these types of intrusions. especially while his father was the sitting vice president. here now with me, the investigative journalist, fox nation host, lara logan. noah shackman tweeted about "the new york times" and, "i hope my fellow editors will think hard, really hard, harder than they did in 2016 before publishing any material hacked by the russians." it seems they haven't learned a lot from the first russia scare. they are saying basically that

because theree was a report from a source that russia hacked into burisa, anything that comes out about burisma and joe biden should be discounted. that's pretty convenient. >> when i first saw that, i thought the tweet was going to be, i hope my journalists think hard before they accept this at face value. it was the opposite. what was unusual about it to me as a journalist, especially is that editors and editors in chief don't normally go out telling other journalists how to react to something. right? >> laura: talk about groupthink. >> it's kind of odd. any time there is something odd you take a closer look. anytime therehi is a red flag -- because here,

why did someone not want me to look at something? why did someone flagged this? beyond that actually, what i recognize here is reminiscent of what was in "the new york times" during the presidential campaign in 2016. an opinion writer went out and called on journalist to abandon their normal standards and principles of objectivity. to make sure this person wasn't elected. that has echoes of that, he reminded me of that. it also reminds you, as journalists we are supposed to be skeptical of everybody. you're telling me not to do something. >> laura: that's like telling your kids, don't check under your bed for the christmas gifts. what you think about your recovery for journalists? there actually needs to be a place where they all go and they go into recovery from this syndrome. a people call it trump-derangement syndrome. i've never seen anything like

it. i've been in this town far too long. way longer than i want to admit. they don't seem to be -- they seem incapable of taking an objective look at stuff that ten years ago they didn't care about at all, like russia. you couldn't get people to cover russia ten years ago. >> how do we know what journalists think? the coverage is dominated and drownedkn out by one narrative. i think a lot of journalists just know that the price of going against a narrative is so high.at what i know from talking to other journalists, it's not worth the problem. that is one part of it. the other problem it is the institutions themselves. where is a accountability from institutions? perhaps russia -- we wouldn't be so quick to rush to judgment if there had been a real accountability with journalists and publications.

got wrong for so long. >> laura: there needs to be a general, the whole deal. no one ever does that. >> if you are an alcoholic the first thing they say is, you have to admit you are an alcoholic. it startsoh with admitting what you did. we haven't gotten to that stage. >> laura: don't you think the ends justify the means? i heard it today. this guy has got to get out of office. let's say they don't want money in politics. in 2016 and it was about money in politics. michael bloomberg says, i'm want to spend a billion and they turn into human pretzels and, it's okay now. to use money and politics because the results will be, will rid the country of this antidemocratic force owned by the russians. blah, blah, blah. >> i havee faith because of my experience with the journalists i have worked with over the years. there journalists who hear that thing and see that kind of thing.g. they see it for what it is. they know that is not it.

>> laura: where are they? >> that's a very good question. they are there. >> laura: it's like college campuses, it becomes a self-selecting group. there are not that many conservative professors. maybe not the universityec of chicago. >> but you don't have to be conservative. your background, your cultural understanding, your worldview. i'm not sayingun it should proselytize the students, but there is no intellectual diversity. it's a monochromatic, ideological lurch to the left. the same thing is happening in the media. where in "the new york times," if people looked at an old facebook post, you might have said something objective about it trump, i don't see you getting hired at "the new york times." >> forget it. that would be true. being an independent voice gets you smeared as being right.th once you're smeared as being right, who's going to touch you?

>> laura: vince vaughn shakes the president's hand, the actor. lsu national championship. they're getting all over him on twitter. you can't even show up in public anymore. you shook this man's hand. >> that's public shaming, right? if you are associated with this president in any way, or if you standre up for the principles ad it happens to work in his favor, that's enough to put you in that basket. >> laura: unbelievable. great to see you. when we come back, the chief who cried wolf? elizabeth warren is losing allies as she feuds with bernie sanders. was she lying? charlie hurt, scott bolden, mercedes schlapp. that's going to be fiery. that's up next.

♪

♪ >> this entire situation is so incredibly disappointing. bernie sanders encouraged elizabeth warren to run and 2016. contextual information is incredibly important to the conversation. he left out to paint a particular candidate as some sort of sexist. >> c laura: elizabeth warren's attempt to frame bernie sanders as a woman hater is backfiring. she's also feeling the burn. on twitter where they are using the hashtag, refund elizabeth warren. about where supporters can get their donations back. even from democrats pushing back, tulsi gabbard tweeted about sanders. "he showed me the greatest respect and encouragement. just as he always had." charlie kirk, founder of turning point usa and author of, go get it. "the maga doctrine." i already have my copy. scott bolden, former chair. you are rude. i should say, scott bolden -- uh.

i would never do that because i adore you. [laughter] >> i apologize. >> laura: this is acid reflux. this whole thing. let me tell you. this to me has all of the trappings of 2020. newt gingrich, i urge them to form a coalition. if g they had to take on romney, they had to work together and instead they were ripping together. romney comes out smelling like a rose. why would they both focus on joe biden? >> it makes no sense. the running against each other. we are four weeks from the primary, or the caucuses. i don't think it's going to work this time. the debate, they both came out strong.

they said they are bigger, broader issues and we will not divide. the progressives have said, we are not going to do that. it was a nonissue in the debate. i don't know why warren, in her orbit. someone released this 2018 conversation, and then gets a run out of it. >> laura: i think she's lying. this goes back to the inauthenticity problem. he called her pocahontas, she ig a phony. she claims she was a native american and she wasn't. no one believes her. >> we have fake news and we have fake warren. so there you go. but i think for elizabeth warr elizabeth warren, it was a desperate move. we know that bernie sanders is gaining ground in states like iowa, new mexico, california. they play to the same type of voters.s in her mind she is thinking,

biden is the front runner, but he is a weak front runner. the one i have to go after is bernie sanders. i think that was her strategy and it totally backfired. i think sanders came out honest. >> laura: he's like a grandfather figure. elizabeth c warren has a long history of pushing false tales. watch. >> i was visibly pregnant. the principal did what principles did in those days, wished me luck and hired somebody else for the job. why did the facts say? >> you absolutely have a native american ancestry in your background. >> my dad was a janitor. >> her kids went to private school.y it goes to that same point. she is doing everything she can to save a failing presidential campaign. p. but your point is very

insightful, laura. the only thing that could really help joe biden right now it is two divided senators that are helping each other. that soon might be quarantined in a senate impeachment trial. having the fight at the worst possible time.mi all of a sudden, joe biden will benefit from this. it goes to a broader point, if you add the totals with warren and bernie, that's a formidable candidate looking at the coalition. the tone of the democratic party is much more in their direction. >> laura: scott? >> they're both in the race which is a real problem. >> laura: elizabeth warren is never going to be president of united states. i don't make proclamations like that, but never. never going to be president, okay? she would do well now to drop out and start campaigning for bernie. that is what she should do. and then maybe he will throw her a bone and maker vice president. >> not even before the first caucus? >> laura: god bless her. people aren't going to vote for her. she should drop out. and endorse bernie.

>> she's polling pretty high. you can't deny the polling numbers. in iowa. >> laura: i knew they were garbage when they said trump was so far down in 2016! >> the bottom line is, if you are right it will be confirmed. >> laura: she will never be president. mercedes, i want to get your thoughts. on this "new york times" headlines from tonight. trump and his aide focused on two rivals. most of the presidents rivals see mr. sanders helping to solve trump's problem with the suburban voters. in states like virginia. some have concerns that sanders might be more durable in the rust belt states. that goes to the issue of trade. bernie sanders said tonight, he would have done better trade deals with china. mercedes. >> he also said he would support the usmca which is a bipartisan piece a legislation. we know when it comes to that, that is something both parties support. he is talking about climate change.

that's all he cares about. >> laura: if it was so easy, why didn't obama do it in eight years? panel, up next, breaking news about michael avenatti. so when my windshield cracked... my friend recommended safelite autoglass. >> tech: hi, i'm adrian. >> man: thanks for coming. >> tech: oh, no problem. >> tech: check it out. >> man: yeah. they came right to me, with expert service where i needed it. that's service i can trust... no matter what i'm hauling. right, girl? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪

♪ ♪ >> laura: very sad breaking news. michael avenatti, disgraced attorney and constant thorn in everyone's side, arrested again >> michael avenatti, disgraced attorney and thorn in the side of everyone on earth arrested again taken into custody by federal agents for violating the terms of his previous relief. as he was walked out of the

courthouse he said, quote, completely innocent. i hope he has something tonight as he spends it behind bars until his court hearing tomorrow morning. that is all-time we have tonight. shannon bream, take it all from here. >> the president holding a campaign rally in milwaukee is democrats debate in a final countdown to the iowa caucuses. the president says his maximum pressure campaign is working in the middle east, others say his policies are dragging us to the brink of war with iran. getting the us mca to a phase i agreement with china, democrats making the case about climate change.