pls. [sneezing] cancel your cold. the 1-pill power of advil multi-symptom cold & flu knocks out your worst symptoms. cancel your cold, not your plans. advil multi-symptom cold & flu. jessie. that's "the story," and the impeachment goes on tomorrow. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." this election is coming up fast, faster than you may realize. how fast? six months from tomorrow, the leadership from the democratic party will gather on the floor of the basketball >> formally nominate their presidential candidates, as of right now there is a strong chance that nominee will be bernie sanders if that happens if sanders becomes the official leader the parties funders will recoil of the democratic party, there will be chaos in terror at what's to comeme ad they will be joined in that terror by the establishment class in new york and los angeles as well as the entire foreign policy in washington. all these people in washington

demanded to know one thing. how did this happen? how did bernie sanders become the democratic nominee? that's a good question. here's part of the answer. it all started last night at the democratic debate in the morning when president jeff zucker a decided to destroy the campaign. his latest client is the democratic establishment. just before last night's debate, cnn ran a story without any proof at all where sanders once told elizabeth warren that a woman could not be president. the message was unmistakable and crystal-clear. he's a sexist, don't vote for him. cnn relentlessly hypes the allegations on air and then once again during the debate. watch how his hand selected moderator frames the story. >> senator sanders, i do want to be clear here, you are saying

that you never told senator warren that a woman could not win the election? >> that's correct. >> senator warren, what did you think when senator sanders told you that a woman could not win the election? >> i disagreed. >> what did you think when senator sanders told you they could not win the election? suddenly, in departments around the brooklyn area, legions of brooklyn supporters understood vote for the very first time when donald trump is always attacking cnn. why? because cnn deserves it. thousands of them reach for the credit cards and response.lw by this morning, thick sanders campaign was reporting its best ever fund-raising on the debate day. it turns out it's possible to level attacks that are so stupid and so unfair that they wind up hoping the person you are trying to hurt.

that's a lesson cnn has repeatedly failed to learn in the trunk era and they were no smarter this time. within zucker's small airlessrn bubble everything appeared to be going up precisely to plan. >> i didn't think his answer vis-a-vis elizabeth warren and what he said in that conversation was particularly good. good. >> i think what bernie forgot is, this is a reported out story that cnn was part of breaking, so to have him flat out say no, it wasn't nearly enough to address that for the women watching. >> i can't imagine any woman watching and saying, i believe burning.* i think people believe elizabeth. >> there was a been banana peel out there for bernie to step on and i think bernie stepped on it and slid around. she knocked that moment out of the park.

>> tucker: oh, cnn. it's a world where buffoonish joe lockhart with mustard stains on his shirt is a renowned expert on what women really want.'s hilarious, ask his first wife. but no one in zucker land thought it was necessary at all. onward to battle, bernie must be stopped. it almost seemed personal and in some ways it was personal. just four days ago cnn settled d lawsuit with its unionized employees for a record $76 million. it was the single largest payout ever collected in the 84 year history of the national league of relations board. when that deal was announced bernie sanders issued a statement celebrating the win for cnn's oppressed and miserable workforce. and they are. congratulations to america for this victory. this is a result getting the workers the justice they require.

but in the end it didn't work. and by the way, it won't work. americans may dislike politicians but they hate the media more. if forced to choose between bernie sanders and cnn, most people will go with burning. chris plante spent many years a working at cnn but thankfully he is gone now and hosts the chris plante show which is excellent and he joins us tonight. i can imagine if you are at cnn and you are putting on this show, do you think other peoplei are going to notice that it's a hit on bernie sanders?s? >> i know that people live in this incredibly well insulatede bubble and they don't really know what's going outside of the newsroom or outside of the building or their social circles.on really, i honestly think they are unaware. you mentioned the question, that abby phillips question. the longer version of that, abby philip actually in the set up to the question says that elizabeth warren confirmed, that's the word that she used,

confirmed the other day that you said that. cnn broke the story. and then abby philip had the temerity to say, and elizabeth warren confirmed the story for us. once again we seen a lot of this last couple of years, circular reporting. you have the same source and you pretend they are still -- and then the confirmation source is elizabeth warren. it's so appalling from start to finish. and clearly tucker, cnn is sticking it to burning. i think i see division taking place on the left wing of the democratic party and theirni chosen one is elizabeth warren. bernie has food stuck between his teeth, he's not the ideal candidate. and you are right, jeff zucker, like a, as he likes to say, looks like he has chosen his horse. everybody on cnn, i didn't see

the same movie they were watching i guess. >> tucker: it's just -- it's remarkable the kind of unity they tend to pull off. over on cnn, is just so obvious that jeff zucker speaking through his eunuch or whatever has issued the order, we are against bernie. we are going to take him out, he is bad news for our party. he doesn't see how that could be counterproductive in the end? >> i have to tell you that they are on fire. they were playing last nightht from project veritas talking about burning milwaukee where they are having the democratic convention. he was robbed, we learned from the hacked dnc emails, and they really sabotaged bernie and stole it from whether he was going to win or not.

and now the dnc kind of has togo take a step back because they know the bernie people are furious and they artie got caught once. so, zucker and the cnn and others in the media are picking up the slack and deck taking the baton, too many metaphors here. but they are moving this process where bernie has to go out and if they are going to have one person representing the left wing of the democratic party, it will be elizabeth warren. >> tucker: if you want to come the country down you have to convince people that the system is not rigged and it's fair. cnn has done a lot to make everybody a lot more angry and paranoid and it does not help america at all. >> if at this late stage of the game vary depending on cnn and other eight stage media to provide to a square and honest truth, it's your fault. at this point it's your fault, wake up. >> tucker: great to see you. joe biden has a lot of baggage as a presidential candidate,

he's been in politics for a long time.re he ignored or defended china and is it essentially a played vassal of america's credit card companies. in last nights debate biden biden portrayed himself as america's -- as a matter of fact, planet earth's savior.in >> i led the effort as you know against surging tens of thousands of troops in afghanistan. i have a overwhelming support from the african-american community, overwhelming. more than everybody else in this operation. i was part of that deal to get the nuclear agreement with iran. i was asked to bring 160,000 troops home from that war whichc i did. i lead that effort. i introduced the first climate change bill and check politifact's, they said it was a game changer. african-americans, black brown, black, and straight. i'm the one that has a broadest coalition of anyone running up here in this race.

i was part of a coalition to put together 68 countries to deal with stateless terror. i have great support, support across the board. >> tucker: people love me, they really do. joe biden's like superman crossed with one of those hip replacement commercials. of course he bragged about bringing our troops home from iraq but back in the day when it mattered, biden was one of the reasons they were sent to that quagmire in the first place. >> some of my own party said it was a mistake to go to iraq in the first place. so was the cost and so will be the cost of not finishing this job. >> tucker: mollie hemingway is senior editor at "the federalist" and she joins us. if you've been in politics for 50 years, 50 years as joe biden has, and you need to spend the majority of your time on the debate stage telling people that don't like what a great person

you are, something's wrong. >> also i'm not sure about his stories. kind of like the walter mitty of the democratic primary. he has the secret political life where he is not the ineffectual politician that we sort of know him to be, but secret adventure is that we didn't learn about until now. what we know from his actual track record is, he's been on the wrong side of most for major foreign policy decisions going back to a very long time. he's been able to pick out the wrong thing. particularly on the issue that you raised on whether it's important to send the regime into harm's way for change or whether to think through and see that's in good order. >> tucker: this strikes me as a sign of weakness. it suggested that you really

know that you are operating from an position of weakness. >> is a good retail politicianan and he tells good stories that might not be true. they are kind of fun to listen to. the problem is he's been doing it for so long and people are kind of aware of thatre track record that it's posing serious problems for him. again, actual instincts on foreign policy tend to be wrong. he wants to be using force when you shouldn't use force and then when he does it's like -- he pulls back at just that moment. it's really remarkable how he can be so consistent and being wrong. >> so we are looking right now's at some of the highest levels of personal debt ever recorded. these are companies charging close to 20% interest and crushing people. so if you are there page hill, are democrats going to vote for

you in a primary? >> i think this is why you are seeing such -- he's been sleeping very well in thein primary and he's been much stronger than i ever thought he would be but you see this unrest from younger voters in particular. there are these viral messages about, please don't make me have to vote for this person. he is someone who reminds you om getting decisions wrong whether it's corporate bailouts or alliances with china. he's operating in the 10-20 years ago mold and many peoplepo in the party, that's why they are not excited. he has a plurality of support there but he doesn't have the excitement that you need in your coalition to take on some of my president trump and that's why you heard some people sound the alarm today about whether he could actually get it done and whether people just want to go with this guy just because the other ones aren't taking steam. if you really want to take out

president trump you need excitement and that's one thing that very few people have in this primary. >> tucker: and if you are 28p and can't buy a car much less get married or buy a house because some creepy credit card company look to for debt in college, and you signed up for student credit cards et cetera, et cetera, the guy living large on bribes from the credit card company, i don't believe it. great to see you. after weeks of an action, nancy pelosi is that she is prepared to move impeachment over to the senate. the key question is, did she do it prayerfully? plus the favorite presidential candidate from 2018 is not on the debate stage companies in a jail cell in santa ana, california.om an update on the downfall of creepy lawyer, stay here.pa ? ? - do you have a box of video tapes, film reels, or photos,

that are degrading? legacybox professionally converts them to dvds, thumb drive, or the cloud. legacybox is simple and safe, with over half a million satisfied customers. visit legacybox.com today, and get 40% off.

all ♪

some things are too important to do yourself. get customized security with 24/7 monitoring from xfinity home. awarded the best professionally installed system by cnet. simple. easy. awesome. call, click or visit a store today.

>> tucker: it was voted to impeach the president almost a month ago. democrats at the time he argued impeachment was a matter of national security and they were trying to protect the nation. they haven't really done much about it, and that's seven of the so-called impeachment managers who prosecute the president during a trial in the senate. as she made the announcement,, pelosi delivered a very odd speech which you should watch online comparing impeachment to the american revolution. as part of it.el >> even our poets, longfellow. remember, listen my children, and you will here come the midnight ride of paul revere.

it's always about marking history using time. >> tucker: you have to wonder why the other networks don't put more unedited footage of nancy pelosi on the air. also definitely not an electionu year, not political at all, it's serious. it's prayerful, it's like a post funeral really. >> this is a very serious matter and we take it to heart. in a very solemn way, he has been held accountable. he's been impeached. they can never erase that. >> tucker: oh, it's internal. the president's soul has been marked for all time. his complaint about hunter biden's corrupt sweetheart job will be brought up on the day of judgment before he is cast inevitably into the lake of fire. that's how serious this is. according to nancy pelosi.

senator john kennedy is a republican representing the state of louisiana. he joins us tonight. thanks so much for coming on. the president will be marked for all time. this is indelible, this mark of impeachment, the mark of the beast. what's your assessment of that claim? >> well i think the senate will have something to say about this. you don't have to be mensa material, tucker, to see that speak speaker pelosi is swollen with partisan rage. the whole process in the house was rigged. we are going to do itle differently in the senate, we will treat both sides fairly. as i said the other day, when we are done, i don't want the american people to look at the senate's work and say, well, we just got run over by the same truck twice. it was unfair in the house and unfair in the senate.

you say look. the senate was fair. they gave you time to both sides and we understand the allegations in the senate voted and that's what we will try to do. >> tucker: probably got no vote at this stage but what would you expect the timeline roughly to be? >> there will be a presentation first by the prosecution. common sense would tell you that the discussion of witnesses is premature. we don't know the senators anyway. t we don't know the details of the prosecution's case. if we don't know the details of president trump's defense because speaker pelosi did not allow him to have one in terms of the prosecution's case. nine out of 10 senators, they had been read the transcript of the house. all they had done is look at the

news articles and they are reading the media reports. as we know after the reporting on the steele dossier, then we need to hear the prosecution and the defense. i think that will take probably four days together and then the senators can ask questions on that will take a couple days. i learned a lot from listening to the questions and learn a lot from listening to the answers. that may possibly be what we are talking about and we can make a decision about witnesses. now i want to be fair about the witnesses.re we talk about chuck schumer as witnesses or speaker pelosi's witnesses -- i think the speakers and senator schumer are together on it -- i want to treat the defense fairly. everybody gets a level playing field. and we could end up in a very odd circumstance where

senator schumer, he caught the car. he asked for his witnesses. in fairness, the president gets his witnesses and we end up hearing from hunter biden and joe biden, whoever else is on the witness list. any of the chairman that were involved, and the prosecution doesn't get to hear its witnesses because of executive privilege. >> that sounds fair to me. thank you so much, now you got me excited about that. appreciate it. one like the one you just heard is being openly discussed and considered by senator mcconnell. he's not calling any witnesses at all but some republicans think public hearings could have marriage. mcconnell seems open to that idea, watch.

>> we could be dealing with the witness issue at the appropriate time into the trial. i think it certainly appropriats to point out that both sides would want to call witnesses that they wanted to hear from. so when you get to that issue, i can't imagine that only the witnesses that democratic colleagues would be called. >> tucker: it seems fair. congressman mike johnson represents louisiana and he joins us. do you think that's fair and will it happen?pr >> of course it's fair. i agree with what senator john kennedy just said. that makes good common sense. if you are going to call witnesses, if that becomes necessary, you have to allow for both sides. so the reciprocity should be continued. adam schiff doesn't need to be n manager company needs to be a witness in the thing because he engineered the whole process. he would have to call hunter biden because of his information

of being on burisma, this terribly corrupt company in ukraine is still directly applicable to what the president's frame of reference was. c you know joe biden might have something to say about that as well, how did his son get on the board in the first place? then you have devon archer who also served on the board, this is important information that served at the heart of the case. if we go down that road then yoa have to have those witnesses as well. >> everything you said not only seems right but it's hard to g argue with it. i'm confused as to why the senate controlled by republicans -- because as the left always says, there are consequences, is demanding this and making it happen. of course he should. >> the first question is whether any witnesses or not. i think if this case is put on it, think the managers that they have sent over, they don't have much to work with. that's a real problem for them,

because everyone in the senate is going to recognize once they do hear the details. they will realize there's nothing here and it's a vapid case. there may not be a need for witnesses because it will be so clear to everyone and that will dispense with the whole question. >> i think that sounds like it's right. thanks a lot for that. appreciate it. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: we got a fox news alert for you now.e it was obvious to everyone watching last night that bernie sanders and elizabeth warren were having a chilly conversation after the debate. earlier we told you about jeff zucker and his role in all of this, now's now cnn has released the audio of what the two were saying. here it is. >> i think you called me a liar on national tv. >> you called me? >> >> what a group.

>> let's not do it now. >> speaking of something you are not likely to have dinner with, the creepy porn lawyer. he's been in a downward spiral all year. has a hit rock bottom?ke evidence suggests, oh, yeah. the latest cpl news. then democrats are pushing private gun ranges just to make absolute sure you are not capable of defending herself when things fall apart. our investigation into that, next.

>> they wanted to find out why people fantasize about sex. so michael do you have those or not? >> i have fantasies involving handcuffs.s. >> tucker: it seems like yesterday he was making near daily appearances over on cnn. >> that's because of your presence on cable news. >> i have 20 years of experience at a very high level and as anth attorney i understand how governmental regulations are passed and how laws are passed, how the supreme court works. i have an extreme depth of knowledge. >> it's also 2018.

and we still remember like it was yesterday. they gushed about the creepy porn lawyer with a dynamo of physical and dare we say, energy. >> he is a beef and he keeps popping donald trump and all his folks and the mouth. >> i o michael avenatti an apology. for the last couple weeks have been saying enough already. what's left to say? i was wrong. >> times have changed a lot for cpl e. no longer haunting your television screen or looking in spaces beneath your bed. instead he's wanting a jail cell. cpl was arrested by federal agents who said he continued to break the law even after his first arrest last march. for details on this, we go as we always do to trace gallagher. >> talk about a tangled way at weber, he was disbarred from the

california bar a association.to stormy daniels attorney was arrested by irs agents who accused him of laundering money and committing wire fraud. turns out stormy's former lawyer recently got settlement from a former client but instead of using the money to pay his ex-wives, some of the $2.5 million he owes her or, and he rented a luxury apartment, and took a series of lavish vacations. the irs said he was able to hide the money from creditors by shifting it through multiple bank accounts and using cashierr checks made out to himself to spend it.gh besides laundering money, prosecutors point out he also has an italian passport and could have hidden assets in europe. today they asked a judge to revoke his bail and the judge agreed. watch. >> the judge in this case today

made findings that he posted an economic danger that there were no terms of relief that would ensure that he didn't continue to engage in this conduct. >> so he's in the california jail right now and will likely be transferred soon to a new york jail where he's being tried sometime in the next few weeks for allegedly extorting nike out of $20 million. >> tucker: trace gallagher, thank you. we should note that we are in los angeles this week where we are minutes from where cpl iss spending his time. we've obviously criticized him quite a bit but it's the new show. we put in our request just hours ago to visit him in jail and we hope that comes through. in the name of public safety, virginia democrats newly offended are trying to erase the second amendment in the commonwealth of virginia. they want to destroy things simply because you enjoy them

and because they might make you safer and more self-reliant. a bill now pending would ban many private indoor shooting ranges. taking away ranges one-stop shootings, and it won't make anyone safer. it's the opposite in fact. they want to take away gun ranges because route gun owners like them. thanks so much for coming on. i dismissed the laws intent, and i wanted to check with you. is there any evidence at closing gun ranges will make anyone safer? >> the evidence will be quite to the contrary. it would make people in virginia less safe because there won't be a place for them to go handleil firearms in a safe and responsible manner, to be educated about how to use firearms. that will make it less safe in virginia, not more safe.

clearly they are trying to disarm the population for whatever dark mode if they might have, but what are they saying they try to achieve with this? >> he's admitted that its aimed at trying to shut down the nra's indoor range and facility in fairfax. he claims it's to prevent workplace violence although i don't understand how he arrives at that conclusion. it's really to shut down the second amendment in virginia by saying, you can't have an indoor range and it's going to cause harm to businesses in virginia. there are about 114 indoor ranges in the state and seven of them will be shut down if this becomes law. these are places where for example, elite shooting center and man assess. 14,000 people go there per month to use the range and enjoy the target shooting and to train. 5,000 people go through that place to be trained on how to use firearms safety. half of them women, to be

concealed carry permits. this is punitive and if you violate this law you could be fined, are you ready for this? up to $100,000 for a single violation of this new law, if it's passed and signed into law. >> tucker: is also true i know for a fact, our troops in the military use this for training. the left took control of your state and they decided to erase the constitutional amendment, ratified again and again. are people going to go along with this? >> there is significant pushback and you are saying that all across the state of virginia were counties and cities are declaring themselves second amended sanctuary counties and cities to push back on these proposed laws, and they are banning essentially the second amendment to confiscate firearms.

that's where it has taken place, and that's where they stand up and support the second amendment rights. and that will make it less safe, not more safe. >> tucker: there's no reason to be passive in a democracy. >> absolutely not. >> great to be with you. >> 100 billion pain pills, opiates, have flooded the market. more than half of million people died. who is being punished? half a million americans died. basic question, we will ask you after the break.

>> tucker: it's been nearly, believe it or not, 25 years since the fda approved oxycontin for use by the general public. some of these countries pivotal events go almost unnoticed when they first happened. since then america has been drowning in a tsunami of opioid pills but, just how many off these pills were in circulation? governors may have no idea how many illegal aliens live here but they do have a number for this, it turns out, we just got it. according to data from the deave from 2006 through 2014, a total of 100 billion doses of oxycodone and hydrocodone were shipped to pharmacies across the country, and then from there into households. that's more than 11 billion doses per year, about 35 opioid pills for every living american. what happens when you do that?

it's not hard to guess.. they cause an opioid epidemic and then come the slaughter that followed. from 1999 through 2018, a total of 770,000 americans died of drug o.d. 770,000. that's more deaths that took place then the americanns civil war, our costliest war, or in all of america's other wars combined. in raw death toll, the opioid crisis is the single human greatest catastrophe to ever afflict the country. here's the remarkable part. nobody, almost nobody has been punished for it. the cyclic family made. $13 billion selling painkillers. they are still rich. none of them have gone to prison and either have others who profited off of the destructione you may have noticed a theme in this country. nobody has ever punished for the real crimes, the ones that really hurt people. the invasion of iraq.is

the subprime mortgage disaster, the plundering of the nation by the chinese government. in washington all of those are minor. they are forgivable if you know and pay off the right people which they invariably do. if only the sackler family had fibbed about some emails that p didn't matter or had a phone call with the russian ambassador, maybe washington would finally care. >> tucker: for all the public statements, the left has developed a weird passion recently, an inconsistent one, destroying girls sports by making girls compete with biological men. republican greg steube introduced a bill into the house that would bar schools from using title ix federal funds to support women sports if biological men are allowed to compete with them. it makes sense, it's not a woman support of men are competing, right? and as recently as 15 years ago that idea would have been too obvious to require federal law. but today it has no chance of passing thanks to democrats control of the house. congressman, thanks for coming

on. you get the common sense award for sponsoring legislation thato you think we wouldn't need. what's the argument against this? >> the argument against this is you are discriminating against people who identify as a woman that day and want the ability to compete. it's fascinating that we are in a place in our country where you have to file bills to make it clear that women are actually going to be competing with women, and women sports.ha >> tucker: what's so striking is that this is one of those phenomenon where there is an identifiable group of victims, w and it's the girls. it's the people that this wasen passed to protect and they say they are suffering. rare feminists have been able to stand up and say this, how can people who pretend they are feminists, that carry the torch for women, and support something that hurts girls? >> i don't know. martina navratilova who is the great tennis great, she supports

this legislation and was against the bill that democrats pushed, the e.r.a. bill because it redefined women sports and allowed men to compete in women sports. so you even have people on the other side of the aisle going, hold on a second, this doesn't make sense. we are completely eroding what women sports are if we allow biological men to compete with women in women's collegiate activities. >> tucker: none of this is an attack on women, it's merely saying that girls are hurt when we allow this to happen. were there any -- and it's obvious and everyone knows it, and it's only because of the w bullying from the lunatics online and was allowed to say it out loud. a are there any democrats who would believe what you're sponsoring? >> i filed pretty much what my bill is and not a single democrat voted for it. we did it as a motion to recommit on the floor of the house on some older legislationf and i believe there was only one or two democrats have voted for it. that's a sad state of affairs that we are in for today. we are destroying women sports

and democrats aren't willing to stand for women in women sports. >> tucker: so after a million years we are redefining gender out of existence? that can have consequences. great to see you. the pentagon has spent millions of dollars investigating ufo's now they are telling us that their findings are too dangerous to show the public. what does that mean, exactly? what could the findings mean? we will be back with more after this. he findings mean?

>> tucker: for about 70 years the u.s. government avoided saying anything about ufos and they didn't exist but the first time ever the defense department admitted three f different tapes 2004-2015 general footage of unknown object. the navy refusing to declassify forms, saying it would impair her national security. what does that mean? what kind of information does those reports obtained? the government programs and services at the academy, he joins us.

thank you for coming on. >> thank you for having me. >> tucker: the languages so typically understated.d. this one said it would cause severe damage to the u.s. national security if we release this. what does that mean?n? >> typically the three categories of classified information to help her stomach top, secret, confidential. hope is that if released could provide graveda damage to the national security of our count country. >> tucker: but what way could knowing more about those tapes of the objects damage the security? i'm totally confused. >> tucker: if you have video, you are doing it to protect m sources and methods, locational data, qualifying or certain aspects of technology that we are testing. in this particular case, there are methods, means to sanitize

video. you can clear up the metadatapl for example, you can of course sanitize the video to not reveal the sources and methods. to me, it is a little peculiar when the pentagon say we cannot release the video. perhaps the raw data, the raw data for sure but there are ways to get around that. >> tucker: welcome of course. my hunch is they don't know what these objects are and they defy physics. they don't want information because it will terrify the public. >> well, that is absolutely a possibility but another possibility too is they don't know what it is. quite frankly to be in that position t you are the departmet of defense and you don't have answers, that would be an uncomfortable position to be in. that is e why we need to have a conversation as a people, as american citizens. >> tucker: i'm struck that this kind of information is known for an awfully long time. and political figures have ready and on these reports and i know

some of them. and none of them have described in public they have heard in these briefings. why do you think that is? >> i think there is a lot we still need to know. my time, we came across a lot of information that frankly from a conventional perspective simply doesn't make sense. these are vehicles able to perform in ways that, frankly, defy our understanding of physics. now, that doesn't mean defined't physics but simply means we don't yet understand the science behind how these things are moving. quite frankly, if this was ever an avid cereal technology this could be game changing for the country. >> tucker: 100 knots under water but very quickly, do you think officials and the pentagon are unnerved by this and scare people that know about this information? >> i do. my concern is not enough people in the pentagon are aware of this program here that was kind of the frustration i had when i was in the program.

there are still elements right now and the pentagon that don't want this information to become public. >> tucker: at this stage, it seems verynl unlikely they wille able to keep that information. thank you so muchrm for that. it is always great to see you. appreciate that. >> thank you for having me.re always my pleasure. >> tucker: we will be back 8:00 p.m. tomorrow >> the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink." do t. if you want to have that discussion, we can have it -- >> i just wanted to say,

>> welcome to hannity it. it was a huge day at the white house. president trump signing phase one, a historic new trade deal with china. benefiting our economy, jobs, gdp, straight on down the line. for years, decades china has taken full advantage of this country far too long. no president has been up to the challenge for freer and fairer trade deals with china and others. the great news is this will bring hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue to american farmers, american manufactures, service industries and much more. over two hundred billion dollars. that's just the next two years alone. this is y alone. this is yet another major promise made him a promise kept by the president that you will never hear from in the media mob. we have al t