tv The Ingraham Angle FOX News January 16, 2020 7:00pm-8:00pm PST
7:00 pm
y. settling with nicholas sandmann, look, i think they are or multiple fake news stories about russia collusion? desperately puffing up the doubt it. historic nature of this. if humpty and his wannabe of course it is historic. it doesn't happen very often. but it's historic because it is assistant, exposed by his own the first partisan impeachment of this type, with no unity in journalism, what your network. let not your heart be troubled, the senate for clearly lauren graham, big show tonight. procedures or resolutions, that >> laura: hannity, i know you is not going to be possible, as are very upset about the jim they had with clinton. comey developments. i have one of those fruit but there desperately trying to bouquets on its way to you puffed this up. because i know you are very >> there is a tinge of broken up by the investigation sanctimony, not, not solemnity. they also failed to bring the into comey's leaks. public along, public opinion, why did it take them so long? and failed to bring republicans along in the house, and now, that's my question. >> sean: yeah, i think we they are in the senate with this know. lack of candor, government very partisan, rhetorical documents, i think i will put articles of impeachment i don't really say anything come up with all of us in jail. them on post-it note. >> laura: those were his they could have sent a post-it personal documents, in the sedan note, i'm not the walk across paid for by the u.s. taxpayer. the halls of congress. have it mike wright show as we respect the process and the always. i'm laura ingraham, this is senate, laura. we respect to the fact that "the ingraham angle" from leader mcconnell and others washington. this is going to be the go to are going to engage. i will tell you something about our for every key twist and turn of this impeachment farce. white house counsel and his
7:01 pm
team. they are ready. they are prepared. the political, the cultural, the legal, all here. while everyone else is preening in front of the cameras night after night, tell you what will happen, what did happen, what senators now sworn in. won't happen, they've been disturbing new reports emerging working in quiet, around-the-clock, to be prepared about what may be in mcconnell's rules governing for the senate trial. the trial. i'm a trial in the senate will our legal team weighs in. be a more familiar process to it's an all star one. americans. they know what a trial is. they know what judges and juries plus, sandra martha mcsally is here exclusively to respond to do, they know what witnesses and the firestorm -- i don't know if evidence means. you saw this today -- created by >> laura: its political. her concentration, is like >> completely known to five seconds, with a cnn americans. you talk about making history this week, donald trump made history. the trade deal with china -- reporter. it was the talk of capitol hill >> laura: we had that last today. they can dish it out but can't night, it was amazing. take it. tonight, the resistance thinks you know, i like how we say the they have two more silver tale of two leaders, a tale of bullets to take down the trump presidency. they are here to explain why two signings, it was those silver bullets are blanks. something -- >> with their pens. >> laura: i'm going to get to and my "angle" comes later in this later, but it's like they are the revenge party, and the the hour it, i like when that republicans right now are the results party. happens, mixes it up. garlic's plane what of future we're in for if democrats >> what matters to americans. >> laura: i want to show you regain power in november. how tainted even historians have but first, mcconnell's senate resolution that lays out the become who are trotted on cable
7:02 pm
rules for impeachment is going news to talk about this. to be introduced formally on tuesday. watch. >> the country has a president a couple of different sources in who operates as an outlaw. the senate are telling us that we haven't had an outlaw chuck schumer has not yet seen president before, and that is the rules, the specifics. what you have with donald trump. outlaws in american history get again, they can always be their fans, fans, billy the kid amended. but the rules are in the final or al capone, donald trump may stages in the form of this be in that's world. overall resolution. now, they will be debated next >> but nobody interjects. that's what i can't understand. week at some point, it will include things like how long people saying something on live each side has to advance its tv, but you have to pull them back and say, wait a second, we case, how long to offer a can't he say that on our network rebuttal, and more. well, another report emerging because you are not revealing facts, you are not providing today that indicates that three g.o.p. senators, romney, news. you are providing your opinion, murkowski, and collins, want or and your wishful thinking. maybe even demand a vote on you've been showing clips of bill clinton, to have to say, whether witnesses will be call you and i were part of that. we were around. called. but mcconnell has also i think one person in washington promised to model the trial rules after the clinton can't wait for impeachment to be over has got to be bill clinton. impeachment rules. seems really smart, a smart >> laura: all of the old thing for him to do. clips. but now we are learning his >> really get it taken to him. resolution as of tonight will not include a provision for a andrew johnson isn't here. >> laura: bernie sanders is motion to dismiss, which was really upset, by the way. i don't know if you've seen this, but he knows the trial is part of the clinton impeachment
7:03 pm
resolution. going to take him off the trail. bob byrd at the time pushed for >> going to take him off the trail, conserving his energy. that. now, if this is true, it's a >> i would rather be in iowa huge mistake. a motion to dismiss could be today. there's a caucus there in two voted on, well, of course before and a half weeks. i would rather be in any opening arguments are made, the white house counsel could new hampshire. nevada, so forth. just move. that will probably fail. or it could be made after i swear a constitutional oath as opening arguments, but before any vote on whether any a united states senator to do my witnesses should appear, any job. >> there's nothing in the constitution that says you other matter. as we've documented, we've done should be a socialist country, by the way. this extensively this week, give all of our money to medicare for all or the green these articles, to anyone who is new deal. he would rather be in iowa. fair, and not just a rank, it sounds like he already knows how he's going to vote. trump-hitting partisan, they are not just efficient on their face. i actually think they are he things it's an add water and fraudulent. right up to yesterday when stir process, which is itself nancy pelosi purposely again offensive. people keep comparing the pulled a schiff and misquoted impeachment process is on the rules, but you can't compare compare the fact pattern. the transcript. the fraudulent articles to a if your viewers know how to tune full-blown trial in the senate? to cnn, how to change the in my view, it rewards the house his own lawlessness on this, and channel, they did an amazing rank bias. documentary recently, where bill clinton had his personal republicans need to do what they
7:04 pm
did during the kavanaugh secretary saying hide these gifts under your bed that i gave hearing. they united in this travesty to monica lewinsky. i was never really alone with now. here's why. her, was i? there is nothing like that here. the election is just a blink i think that is why the public away. democrats are clearly afraid is losing interest in the that if they don't remove trump, impeachment, but also come according to an "usa today" hope they throw something against the wall and it will poll, 11 out of 12 on the most stick in the next couple of weeks, he is going to trounce them again. important issues to your family. >> laura: i went back and watched, everyone saying it was the debate the other night -- i actually started to feel sorry not going to happen, trump is for joe biden up there. going to bubble the trade deals. my favorite, the tariffs were this resolution should be going to tank the economy. he could have kept the tariffs tweaked, amended, whatever you call it. on the economy. follow the clinton impeachment >> two trade deals done, two model. robbed me, collins, terrorists out, two supreme court justices -- >> laura: are you doing at lamar alexander, do they really 2020 numerology thing for us want to go to their home state tonight? and say, oh, yeah, we want -- we >> not really, just stating the facts. >> laura: thank you for want the president to have two stopping by. all right, "the new york post" editorial board is questioning endure more witnesses that weren't even discussed or talked adam schiff's role as the lead to at all in the house. impeachment prosecutor, writing they really want to go to utah late yesterday, "a normal court and make that argument? with reject a dishonest or tennessee to make that prosecutor like schiff. he's been lying to the world for argument? that is how mitch mcconnell should put it to them. years in his nonstop campaign to a shorter trial with a motion to dismiss right at the top or smear president." joining me, sol wisenberg, former deputy whitewater
7:05 pm
after the first initial arguments are put on by the independent counsel, and house impeachment managers and harmeet dhillon, 2020 advisory board member. what do you make of nancy's white house counsel, impeachment managers, as a pat cipollone. here now is whole? >> well, i think the way they senator martha mcsally, republican from arizona, a juror -- sworn in today -- and are handling the impeachment, the impeachment trial. not just the managers, but before we get your thoughts on what i just said, the senate particularly speaker pelosi, it reminds me a lot about they should do, even understanding a few stragglers, i want to ask y. tried to do with brett kavanaugh, in the sense that they are bringing stuff in, supposedly dramatic information >> senator mcsally, should be at the very last minute, when it senate consider new evidence is part of the impeachment trial? really should be beyond the >> man, you are a liberal hack. deadline, and they are dubious i'm not talking to you. >> you are not going to comment? witnesses, and they are sleazy witnesses. >> laura: [laughs] the whole thing is like a hot you heard that, "you are a liberal hack." mess. as i said the other night, she based on the media reaction, you'd have thought my new ride - is not serious. there was a way to have handled this seriously from the very beginning, and she blew it. so now they are desperate, and they're pulling out all the stops. >> laura: harmeet come >> she calls him a nasty name. according to pelosi, the impeachment trial isn't actuallt >> prize-winning excellent journalist. >> nobody looks at him with a proof or evidence.
7:06 pm
real, objective lens, and sees anything but objectivity biased. >> is not a question of proof, it's what allegations have been made, and that has to be >> laura: [laughs] subjectivsubjected to scrutiny w senator, do you regret what you said? we go forward. >> laura: harmeet, i don't >> no, laura, i do not. i said it again as i went in. you are a liberal hack, buddy. understand, she is quoting old limericks and rhymes yesterday, you know, these cnn reporters, and now, we need a special many of them around the capital, they are so biased. interpreter for nancy. >> it's total gibberish, laura, they are so in cahoots with the and those trial lawyers are looking at this and just democrats, they still can't stand the president, and they run around trying to chase cringing. it is absolutely a violation of every principle that we hold republicans and asked trapping questions. i'm a fighter pilot. dear. yes, there are deadlines, judges i call it like it is. that is what we see out of the impose rules, there is due process, and there are no surprise witnesses. mainstream media, and especially cnn every single day, so this isn't perry mason in real life. obviously, i'm going to tell the the whole thing is just such a grab bag of mismatch of garbage truth, and i did it today, and it's laughable. that it really reflects poorly >> laura: they were saying on the congress as a body and on you've gone full trump. >> they've also said it was the entire process. unbecoming a senator and i i'm afraid it's going to undermine americans respect for lashed out. the entire system of government >> laura: i have a question. what do they do on a daily that we have. >> laura: back to this motion
7:07 pm
basis? to dismiss, i'm on this, i can't they called trump a russian asset, the call all of you hacks on a daily basis. drop this issue, but my and they always say, well, sources tell us, or what we sources told me tonight, it is not in the resolution as it is understand, or people are saying. meanwhile, it's just the people currently drafted, they can amend it and i think ever who at the cnn, you know, producers cares about this should put pressure on the senate to amend meeting. >> exactly, and then the democrat senators walked by, and this and put a motion to dismiss they say hi, how are you today? is a vote before the witness they chase after the republicans. vote. what are your thoughts on that? it's ridiculous. are there cheerleading the >> you know, you were talking democrats, they hate the president. about the clinton case earlier, >> laura: they say it is because you are in a tight race and you will lose in november to and at first they were going to do it like that and do a motion the astronaut. >> i speak the truth, and i will to dismiss early on, and they continue to do it. i've done it my whole life. changed it so it could be >> laura: wolf blitzer brought at any time. commented, he interviewed the ultimately, near the very end, after three witnesses had given victim here, manu raju. you are strong, but i think he could take you. depositions, they did allow a motion to dismiss. they were demanding. i think, at this point, laura, whether it is in the rules are they are demanding something not, it's just not going to work from you. early on because apparently watch. >> i take it she or her staff, you've got four or five republican senators who aren't going to go for it, and they no one has reached out to apologize to you, have they? >> i have not heard from them at probably think -- either that it's not right or that it's not
7:08 pm
all. >> if they did the right thing, a good political move. i'm not as scared as some other she would personally call you people are about calling and say i'm sorry. witnesses. that's an awful thing she did. be careful what you ask for. >> laura: i think they should >> laura: you and i are on the apologize to james earl jones, same page. opens up a possible pen he should get his voice-over back. >> they have a lot of apologizing to do, and they pandora's box. harmeet, are you o with me, the should be filing the reports with the dnc. motion to -- i went back and >> laura: i want to ask, my read the resolution that was passed and agreed to unanimously concern about opening the by daschle and trent lot in pandora's box, 11th hour witnesses, text messages from a 1998. >> i agree with you, laura, and guy who is obviously trying to get his sentence reduced, i also agree this is probably a scribble-scrabble on a vienna political decision by the fence sitters on the republican side, notepad from the ritz-carlton, but it is not the end of the world, because we have tools. and then the republican moderates want to have a vote on in real court, a motion for witnesses. why do the republicans always do summary evidence, judgment after this nonsense, and democrats evidence, but there are ways to always stay together? dismiss a defective prosecution, >> well, laura, we are trying to and hopefully we will be able to stay together, and that is the do that after these people are intent of the vote we are going placated with the initial vote. to take on monday. when we open up witness lists, hundred senators under hopefully it will be reciprocal. president clinton voted for the process to start going. >> laura: okay.
7:09 pm
the vast majority is going to be sol, i don't trust republicans just like clinton, but chuck schumer and others, obviously, are not wanting to be to negotiate a good deal on th with us, so we are trying to unite as a g.o.p. this. i love mitch mcconnell, i you know, everything schumer is think he's really smart. doing right now, is not about you just never know. and these guys aren't trial president trump. thought about the constitution. it's not about a fair trial. lawyers. you guys are in court all the he just wants power. time. >> laura: what about >> defendants get to call manu raju's question? witnesses in trials. the whole idea that only the they want witnesses? >> i want a fair trial. house managers would get to call >> laura: you can call me a witnesses is just a joke. conservative hack, but do you a joke. want witnesses, yes or no? >> we all agree on that. why are you telling us? >> because we are going to vote >> laura: jeffrey toobin says basically everyone is afraid. on tuesday to start the trial, if they don't want to call and let them present -- witnesses, they are afraid. i think we don't want to insult >> laura: how are you going to this process or create a vote on the motion for more witnesses? precedent for a fraudulen fraudt >> we are going to get to that. >> laura: kind of an easy impeachment to go forward. sol, harmeet, thank you for question, don't you think? coming on. >> we will proceed forward on coming up, was senator mcsally that point -- write about manu raju, or just laura: you're not going to mean? later in the show, we reveal the vote with romney and the others? >> a final vote with strong evidence that shows the bias. up next -- this is like a running joke with these earrings unity after phase one is complete. falling off, tell you about that >> laura: okay, well, to go later. democrats think that if a new for a lev parnas as the silver against trump. bullet in this case, that is it
7:10 pm
shady character named lev parnas. smacks of michael avenatti. my next guest say not so fast. we will get back to that. stossel, hemingway, and york michael cohen, michael avenatti, lev parnas, they should start a rock group together. explain why the left supposedly >> there has to be parity. silver bullets are really planks. stay there. whoever they are asking for, president trump's lawyers and the defense get to also -- >> laura: i will see you a john bolton, and i will raise you a hunter biden. >> it's fairness. its parity. >> laura: editor, thank you for missing your plane tonight i'm going tomorrow. i really appreciate it. i don't expect an apology coming from you anytime soon. speaking of the senate, democrats in the upper chamber raised in the impeachment drama to the next level. >> when the chief justice walked in, you could feel the weight of the moment. i saw members on both sides of the aisle visibly gulp. >> a solemn moment for all of us, but the moment when the very weight of history becomes clear. >> right now, it is incumbent on the united states senate to do the work of upholding america's
7:11 pm
constitution and our fair system of justice. >> it was a knot in my stomach when the chief justice came in to the chamber and then pronounced the name "donald john trump." >> laura: okay, first of all, i cannot believe he's a senator from my home state of do you have concerns about mild memory loss related to aging? prevagen is the number one pharmacist-recommended memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
7:14 pm
♪ >> laura: well, the resistance thinks it has two shiny new silver bullets to take down trump. the phrases lev parnas, the shady ukrainian former associate of rudy giuliani who is the talk of a town after his interviews on msnbc and cnn and others. >> stunning new allegations emerged that associate of rudy giuliani directly implicates trump. >> it's hard to conceive of a more relevant come a more material witness and lev parnas. the spotlight needs to be on 100 senators demanding to hear more from parnas. >> laura: who is this guy? 's mr. parnas has been indicted
7:15 pm
for violating campaign finance regulations, started a country in 2013 called "fraud guarantee," that's my favorite, two years after being accused of fraud. don't worry, to the resistance, he's a lot more credible than trump. >> today, trump does denied knowing lev parnas, despite having multiple photos with him. parnas says the president was aware of his efforts to get dirt on the bidens and was in close coordination of giuliani, but today, trump said he doesn't think they've ever spoken. >> laura: to every person you ever took a photo with, you know intimately. jenny me now, molly henning miller, senior editor at "the federalist." byron york, she political correspondent for the "washington examiner," and kimberley strassel, wall street editorial board member. all fox news contributor's. these folks risk being -- just like with avenatti. >> this late information. one of the things i was interesting about the kavanaugh
7:16 pm
smear campaign as it began with something that had no evidence but was at least kind of plausible. didn't get really crazy into the end when avenatti and his client, julie swetnick, were making truly outrageous allegations. lev parnas going straight to the julie swetnick phase of operations, rather than going through something more reasonable. it was interesting, though, that so many people in the resistance cling to these people who claim to have evidence that will truly, finally bring down president trump, no matter how many times it blows up in their face. >> laura: by rent, they are posing for photos with parnas. they were smearing him just a month ago, now posing for photos. tweeting about it. >> it's obvious credibility problems. remember the guy who claimed that devin nunes went to vienna in december 2018 and met with viktor shokin, the former prosecutor over there. did not happen at all. the person who claimed that was a lev parnas. also alleged contacts with president trump.
7:17 pm
obviously, he's under indictment. if there's anybody you want to stay away from right now, it would be lev parnas. >> laura: giuliani should have stayed away from him. >> exactly. >> laura: giuliani, these unsavory characters, why is he hanging out? i was in ukraine in 1983, it was a dark time then. corruption, still come all of the east country still have problems. kim, this is quite something, when you have the media clinging to this -- it's like the last buoy of hope. lev parnas. they keep promising more tidbits, but not mentioning in these interviews any of the points that byron just made about his past or his credibility. never even mentioning it in the intros. >> yeah, and you know the problem too for the media is that this goes beyond the question of lev parnas' credibility. that's a big first strike. but also, the information he claims to impart is irrelevant
7:18 pm
or unbelievable, right, in that part of this is supposedly the notes that he scribbled. we don't know when they were or in what context, to the extent they might apply to something -- rudy giuliani's activities, which rudy giuliani was completely open about the entire time he was doing. that's -- also he claims to suggest that he knows what was going through donald trump's mind. what bill barr knew. what mike pence knew. we've got people who are far closer to the president in lev parnas who would not seek to make that claim. this is sort of a fantastical tale. >> laura: mollie, of course the president knew. pence was in on it. every twitter conspiracy theory was coming out of lev parnas on television last night. he has no first-hand knowledge about what trump knew, maybe giuliani said something -- we don't know, have no idea.
7:19 pm
>> the media do have some responsibility here. you are supposed to vet allegations and they are made, not just air them and run wild with them. they are not doing in this case. at the same time the care about this information. >> laura: the second silver bullet, the findings from the government accountability office. >> we are very significant breaking news just in. >> nonpartisan independent arm of the government called the government accountability office concluded that the trump administration broke the law when it withheld security aid to ukraine last year. >> i can't wait for reporters to get microphones in front of a lot of senators, and this is really going to be hard for them to digest and ignore. >> laura: well, just a few problems. one, this is a toothless declaration. two, obama's gao found he broke regulations, and it's part of the legislative branch, so it's not surprising they would side .
7:20 pm
byron, do you remember obama's allegations getting covered? >> they came up with bribery, that's when the test of the best. they did not come up with the impoundment control act, which is the law the president is accused of, the omb is accused of breaking. this is a dispute between the branches of government, and especially on spending, this dispute goes back -- these kind of disputes go back centuries between president and congress on how to spend the money. >> laura: it's embarrassing, though, that the media don't even bother to couch this in terms of, well, of course, bill clinton -- or this is a legislative, you know, group, outfit. nothing. not even a reference to that. >> not to mention the actual quality of what they're saying. they say delaying within the same fiscal year is somehow breaking the law. >> laura: nice try. i want your thoughts on the breaking news tonight from a law york times, law enforcement scrutinizing two articles with
7:21 pm
mr. comey published. hackers obtain the document and provided it to the fbi come in both its existence and the collection of it were highly classified secrets. kim, comey keeps saying he's done nothing wrong. why do we keep finding out, i guess he is under investigation? >> yeah, we will see if he is or not. to me, comey aside, this is almost another media story. even "the new york times" admitted they seemed to -- it appeared he was under investigation. to me, the entire tenor of that story was designed to enable another hit on bill barr, to suggest that somehow the department of justice was reaching way back. >> laura: reaching way back, mollie, we just lost the satellite. >> the headline said it was a year's worth old situation. they are investigating something that happened a month before he was fired. only from 2017. the fact is that the russia hoax, which is very dangerous
7:22 pm
and damaging to the republic, was fed by leaks. this is a story that was presumably leaked by comey's own team to make it look like he is okay and it's a continuation. >> and we know comey was a weaker. wrote the memo about his talk with the president, gave it to a friend for the purpose of giving it to the near times. >> laura: heard it from a friend. kim, byron, mollie, thank you. beyond the impeachment hysteria, let's pull back the curtain what is going to happen, if in november, the worst possible thing could happen. the radicals take power. matt schlapp, chris hahn react to it. don't go away.
7:27 pm
♪ >> laura: hope and change becomes revenge and pain. that's the focus of tonight's "angle." tonight, i want you to think beyond all the procedural wrangling of impeachment we talked about earlier in the show and i want to put your mind on the big picture, what is really at stake for america, for your kids and your grandkids. by that, i mean what we stand to lose if the radicals -- you know, those people who dragged us through this obscene impeachment? if they were to take power in november. well, yesterday nancy pelosi acted, of course, like the part of an aggrieved patriot.
7:28 pm
>> we pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic, for which it stands. that is what our nation is. that was the decision of our founders. listen, my children, and you will hear, the midnight ride of paul revere. listen, my children, and you will hear about an assault on the constitution. the present takes a special oath that was taken by president george washington, the patriarch of our country. >> laura: in case we didn't know what it oath was, she had to show us. nice try, san fran grand nan. of course, her party is morning tune with saul alinsky instead of james madison. on cnn, a couple nights ago, they gave us a sneak preview and how they plan to tank the economy. >> i will stop all new drilling and mining on federal lands and
7:29 pm
offshore drilling. >> my plan cost $1.5 trillion over it decade. no small sum. >> to reinstate and rebuild obamacare, an option that costs $700 billion over ten years. >> raise their minimum wage to $15 an hour. we are going to have a green new deal. that is what democratic socialism is about coming that will win back the selection. >> laura: kids, get off my lawn. i guess bernie never really returned from his honeymoon in the soviet union. bye-bye, record unemployment. bye-bye, wage growth. hello welfare and gas lines. it's not just the economy democrats plan to destroy while pretending to be these grand patriots wit, like nancy and her styrofoam flag there. freedom of speech and religion will be under constant assault. >> there can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break, for anyone or any institution, any organization in america that
7:30 pm
denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us. >> protecting the right of a woman to be able to make decisions about her own body, it's fundamentally what we do and what we stand for, as a democratic party. >> laura: of course, human rights, children, babies -- no. of course, the left subscribes to their own type of religious orthodoxy. and they bow down at the planetary altar. >> we have to fight climate change with such urgency. >> climate is my number one priority. >> climate change threatens every living thing on this planet. >> laura: remember, the left climate change police, they aggressively enforce the dogma. even a supposedly more centrist joe biden has had to adopt their lingo. >> we should be investing in infrastructure that raises roads, makes sure we are in a position that every new highway
7:31 pm
bill is a green highway. >> laura: at this rate, someone like greta thunberg will be his running mate. >> how dare you. >> laura: okay, we need a longer sound bite. sorry. i almost said greta van susteren, but she is my friend, i didn't mean to say that. there are no more moderate democrats left, though. remember governor blackface northam of virginia? he built himself as a pragmatic, middle-of-the-roader? that lasted 5 minutes, now he is moving against gun rights, advocated infanticide, and running roughshod over religious freedom. some a moderate. the left stuck by him after the kkk blackface yearbook photo, but the price was a loyalty oath to radicalism. so again, if the democrats take the white house in november, they are going to move against all inconvenient speech. and moderates and never trumperers, you think you're going to get a free pass
7:32 pm
because you didn't like how? good luck. just look at what they're doing to poor meghan mccain over at "the view." chuckled as near times piece just published. "the view" has a meghan mccain problem. the problem is with miss mccain still on the show. there's not much to enjoy. again, repeat, mccain doesn't even like trump. so it doesn't matter if you think you are reasonable today, as a republican. the left will always come for you, in the end. the positive coverage, people receiving now like mitt, susan, lisa, lamar, that's all because the left hates trump more than you do. when he's gone, so will your green room passed to all of the networks. heck, the left is so consumed with hatred for trump at all of you who support him, they won't even tolerate a hint of objectivity or balance. earlier this week, msnbc's larry o'donnell spit his angry bile at the liberal cnn.
7:33 pm
>> one-third of the people on their payroll love trump. it's one of the reason trump kind of wants you to watch cnn instead of msnbc, because we don't bring on myers. i don't bring on a liar. i won't do that. >> laura: never. >> donald trump loan documents there show that he has cosigne cosigners, the cosigners are russian oligarchs. >> laura: what? really? >> last night on the show, i discussed information that wasn't ready for reporting. i did not go through the rigorous verification and standards process here at msnbc. >> laura: what? really? if 2020 sweeps democrats into power, the government will be filled with angry msnbc hosts. thousands of political appointees to do to the american people what they are trying to do to president trump. since retaking the speaker's gavel, pelosi has shown us time and again that obama's promise of hope and change is dead.
7:34 pm
>> impeachment that will last forever. >> moscow mitch says that he is the grim reaper. >> i think the president is a coward. i think he is cruel. so don't mess with me. >> laura: that never gets old. they want revenge. and so, november, you don't vote for trump, who vote for one of these other people, it's just going to be payback for four years. if they impeach trump on these bogus grounds, do you think they are going to become bill clinton's interests if they win the presidency? they are going to impeach the economy. impeach the constitution. impeach our history. and bulldoze anyone, any group, any company that gets in their way. unless, that is, republicans stand united and make the case vigorously to the people. unless reasonable independents
7:35 pm
refuse to be bullied by the squad, the leftist hit squads roaming about this town and the country. unless you, the american people, deliver democrats a stinging rebuke in november. and that is the "angle." chris hahn, react to my "angle," and was martha mcsally right about cnn's manu raju? we have the evidence. th voya gives us confidence. so we can spend a bit today, knowing we're prepared for tomorrow. wow, do you think you overdid it maybe? overdid what? well planned, well invested, well protected. voya. be confident to and through retirement.
7:38 pm
i di kept putting it off...et screenwhat was i thinking? ok, mr. jones... we're all done. i told you it was easy. with life line screening, getting screened for unknown health conditions is so quick, painless and affordable, you'll wonder why you hadn't done it before. so if you're over age 50, call now and schedule an appointment near you. for just $149- a savings of over 50%-
7:39 pm
you'll receive a package of five screenings that go beyond your doctor's annual check-up. ultrasound technology looks inside your arteries for plaque that builds up as you age and increases your risk of stroke and heart disease. after all, 4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom is a stroke. so call today and start with a free health assessment to understand your best plan of action. so why didn't we do this earlier? life line screening. the power of prevention. call now to learn more. ♪ >> laura: here to respond to my "angle," matt schlapp, chairman of the american conservative, and chris hahn, host of the podcast. it was hope and change under obama. pretty inspiring, but i didn't agree with lot of his policies.
7:40 pm
some of our media friends, irs, two-party groups, what do we have in store if the democrats do win? >> what i really see his retribution, and i see the democrats being fully unhinged on their most radical policy views. we've seen it in the debates with the presidential candidates. reparations, health insurance for those who come here illegally. you know, the answer to every question of the debate the other day, the start of every answer was "the government needs to," and then you have all of these questions but what unites america. i think when it comes to these radical democrats, laura, i don't think the anymore agree with things we used to believe united us as a country. i don't think they like our founding, and i think a lot of them think that america is a blight on the globe, instead of an inspiration of the globe. >> laura: okay, chris is cyan, i didn't think that was loud enough, chris. >> that was an al gore sigh. >> laura: we will call these
7:41 pm
segments beyond the sighs. go ahead. >> matt, democrats love america the same as republicans love america. in the thought that you would say and question my love of this country, it's just ridiculous. you know that, and you know me. we know each other. i don't question your love. we have a different way of how we think the country should go, but that is where the mind has been crossed by the g.o.p. and by this president. i remember a lot of people being rightfully outraged when a democratic candidate called trump supporter's a basket of deplorable is. should we also be outraged when you say things like i don't believe in the founding of this country? >> i didn't say that. i would like to hit this back at you. you actually don't agree with the same vision of america that i have. i'm not saying you don't love your country, chris, and this really isn't about you, believe it or not. the democrats running for president, they want -- as obama
7:42 pm
said -- they want to fundamentally transform this country into something that is different from the valleys of the founders. >> laura: doesn't even obama find some of these developments, crisp -- because he said as much with some of the things happening on the fringes that seem to have infected even more moderate democrats. even he has kind of -- like, i would be too conservative for this new party. yeah, chris, you would be too conservative for some of the democrat party today, that do have outside influence. >> so, i think when we paint the entire party by its fringes, it's dangerous. i mean, it happens on the right, as well. there are some progressives that want to paint the entire republican party by its most extreme people, like this guy hyde in connecticut and what he is doing. i wouldn't paint a republican with the same brush. i think there are people who want to see america do the right thing and do good, but unfortunately, we have a president of united states who stands at rallies and says all
7:43 pm
democrats hate america. >> i'm just talking about democrats running -- >> the majority leader in the speaker of the house, islamic garb -- >> laura: just to remind everyone, getting back to obama, because i think it is important, he was a two-time democrat president, beloved, he said two months ago that we have to be rg to what was being said at these debates. when he wasn't progressive enough. and whether it is warren or sanders, sometimes even joe biden sounds like he has been infected by this. you can sense obama is worried. >> yeah, i mean, come on, when kamala harris stands on the stage and basically calls joe biden a racist? >> laura: gentlemen, we've got to go. was mixed highly right about manu raju? i have evidence next.
7:45 pm
7:46 pm
7:48 pm
>> laura: adam schiff hatchet man and the favorite by his reporter when they want to damage the president. headlines you see on screen are all pieces he's contributed to. according to "the federalist," came from leaks. steele did not pay for sources. draws new scrutiny. leaks, there's a lot more. a couple more than a dozen that when on one way again trump. that's all we have tonight. you be the judge on that one. shannon bream and the speed 27 team take it here. >> shannon: we begin with a fox news alert.
7:49 pm
it's official, the senate has been sworn in leading to the impartial jurors of president trump and a fight over witnesses will be called will be tonight. key senators, republican susan collins saying tonight about how she plans to vote. a bombshell from "the new york times" saying amidst all of the drama, fired fbi corrector james comey reportedly being investigated for classified information to the media. the times calling investigation highly unusual. anja mccarty, jenna ellis, and bradley maas, or legal eagles
104 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=482658256)