plan to. serious allergic reactions may occur. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." the democratic party has long been a collection of deeply unhappyee interest groups that secretly hate each other. but, for the last three years it's been fairly simple to keep that fractious coalition togethersi you focus on donald trump. despising donald trump and jumping up and down how mean and immoral he is. something they can agree on. nancy pelosi was hoping it would last forever. the last election season intruded and democrats have a few months to choose their party's nominee their standard bearer that means for the first time in a long t time they have no choice but to focus on each other.

the most miserable people you know stuck together in an elevator for eternity. that's what it is like. naturally cnn is right in the middle of it.ha the channel shadowy president jeffrey zucker hasf joined forces with elizabeth warren and her campaign to crush their common enemy, bernie sanders.or just before tuesday night's democratic debate, warren used cnn to attack sanders as a sexist, not sexy, but sexist.as for saying a woman could not be elected president. sanders denied saying it. after the debate, warren marched over to sanders and barked at him, presumably at warren's request, cnn later released that tape. watch how it went, including a special guest appearance by tom steyer who suddenly looks tiny and afraid. >> i think you called me a liar on national tv? >> what? >> i think you called me a liar on national tv? >> let's not do it right now. you want to have that discussion, we will have that discussion. you called me a liar. you called me -- woe won't get into it right now. >> i just wanted to say hi,, bernie. >> okay, good.

>> tucker: elizabeth warren is not someone you would want to have dinner with. tell her you are busy if she calls. what else does that video prove? absolutely nothing. not one thing. we're in the very same place we were at the beginning of the week withn an aging unprovable allegation thrown onto the field in desperation by a fading presidential candidate who seems more unlikeable by the day. it would get nowhere in court. but over at cnn, where being a high school student from kentucky is considered grounds for character assassination, it's enough to show conclusively that bernie sanders hates women. watch the analysis. ♪ i am strong. i am invincible. ♪ >> tucker: i'm sorry, we pulled the wrong tape from our feminist outrage file. more embarrassing. >> it was so real the moment -- her, however you

want to describe it, her frustration, her anger, hercr desire to have -- make this point to bernie sanders was crystal clear. >> so you can clearly understand her fury at that. and, again, it's one of those moments you don't seef very often in politics where she felt very frustrated, used whatever words you want, and she just went over to him and told him what she was thinking. >> i agree with hillary, it was surreal. she was pissed off. >> people i heard all day she knew she was micked. she did that on purpose. that, to me did not look like an on purpose. looked like she was seething lrough that part of the debate. who do we believe? like i believe elizabeth warren. she is feeling under the gun. she is feeling judged as awa woman. i think there is an insensitivity like her frustration on that. >> tucker: yeah. it was totally authentic. this time cnn tells us, this time elizabeth warren was being 100 percent completely

real not like that time she lied about her race or the time she lied about her job history or the time she lied about her plan to finance universal healthcare without a middle class tax hike, no, no, no. this time for sure no question at all elizabeth warren is telling the whole truth and nothing but and you would have to be some kind of misogynist to doubt her. that's what they told us all night on cnn. why tell us that? why lie to us? simple the democratic national committee is worried about bernie sanders. all those attacks on wall street offend donors. so jeff zucker, a democratic partisan said repeatedly he plans to run for office once he is finished ruining cnn.. stop the bernie menace before voters could elect him. that's what you are watching. the media working as always to the hand maidens to thehe ruling class. not just on cnn. the "l.a. times" praised warren for refusing to shake his hand. master class in handling sexism.

okay. is any of this true? is it real? sanders is a socialist, obviously. but is he a sexist? consider this: according to analysis by breitbart, sanders pays his female congressional staffers $3.5000 more per year on average than elizabeth warren does. and yet, according to cnn, elizabeth warren is the real champion of women. so what's the effect of this debate? michael moore isn't much of a filmmaker for that matter much of a person he knows an awful lot of the democratic party. watch his analysis. >> i have known bernie since the 1980s, so, there is no, way he said anything like the way it's been reported. they will mark this day, january 13th, as the day donald trump was reelected. >> tucker: so trump is the beneficiary says michael moore. he may be on to something.

consider four years ago democrats rigged the primary for hillary clinton. they did that despite the fact that hillary clinton would have won anyway. they couldn't resist cheating. because they did that, because they cheated, millions of democratic voters emerged from the process inbitterred and enraged. some of them stayed home last november. others voted for jill stein or gary johnson. some moved over to trump. they suffered shocking upset on election day.on could that happen again? obviously it could. no one in washington knows that because no one in washington ever learns anything. author and columnist mark steyn learns and knows a lot and joins us tonight for an analysis.umn why do you think cnn is carrying water for elizabeth warren, of all of people,nn and will it help elizabeth warren? >> it won't help elizabeth warren. but i agree that cnn are doing this because the dnc and they and cnn are joined at the hip on this regarding bernie is a danger. so everything that the --

the priority for all these forces now is that bernie should not be the candidate. and elizabeth warren, on this show a couple of months ago, tucker, i said to you that i thought she was doing well as she was then because she was talking about policies.s she was talking about policies because she couldn't run on biography because her entire biography is a lie. as you know, you have played that clip just the otherer night of her saying i'm going to get me a beer and as she said no one would actually want to have a beer with the person. i'm going to get me i'm hoity-toity of foreigner as you can find i can do a better i'm gonna get me a beer elizabeth warren. the fact that she pivoted from policy to the lamest of all charges that can you level these identity grievance charges, tells me she is tanking and that at a certain level she is useful to cnn and the dnc in that

as she is nose diving into the briany she can at least take bernie with her. bernie raised 4 million bucks in the 48 hours since this thing started. i don't think it's going to work out for elizabeth warren quite the way she thinks it will. >> tucker: why wouldn't though she keep arguing from policy?r: you could disagree with her policies. i disagree with a lot of them. but, that -- there is some evidence that that works. why wouldn't she keep doing that? >> well, absolutely. i think this is the reason, the debate was such a bust the other night. and why the people who support bernie, the base of the democrat party wants radical change in this country. so they want candidates actually talking like bernie. they want people talking about the socialist healthcare and open borders and all the other flimflam. and in washington, their leaders are talking about some ukrainian phone call for the next six weeks and

on the ground, on the stump, they are just playing these lamest, i mean, it's not -- god bless her, i love helen ready, i am woman, hear me roar. but this is i am strong, i am invincible, i am whining. i don't even get the elizabeth warren charge against bernie. i mean, if i say to some gay guy i don't think iran is ready to elect a gay president, it doesn't mean i'm homophobic. just an assessment of the state of the race as it were. >> tucker: exactly right. it's not even a come prehence cybil allegation. it sounds like i'm defending bernie, i'm notment i'm offended by the unfairness and stupidity of it, i suppose. >> it's totally stupid even in democratic policy terms. >> tucker: great point. mark steyn, great to see you. >> thanks a lot, tucker.r. >> tucker: as the 2020 democratic party reaches climax heart attack and another elderly corporate shill spent his life taking

bribes from the credit card industry. the panic over the bernie sanders candidacy is obvious. some are wondering is there anyone in the race who could beat donald trump? >> i didn't see anybody in there on the stage last night or in the ring that said i'm taking charge. i can be president. i can take on donald trump. >> i think the consensus though is that this was not the type of night of ambition we expected. >> nothing i saw tonight that would be able to take donald trump out. i want to see a democrat in the white house as soon as possible. there was nothing tonight that if you are looking at this thing you say any of these people are preparedhi for what donald trump is going to do to us and to seere further division tonight isal very dispiriting.s >> that debate stage last night frightened me. it really did. >> tucker: a former supreme court clerk and lefty but a smart one joins us tonight. thanks for coming on. >> thanks for having me.

>> tucker: as someone who knows the left well, is this working? elizabeth warren is basically leveling in identity politics attack chief rival on the left bernie sanders. is it effective. >> no, it's not. the reason they are doing it because there is nothing else that they can do. right? this was very predictable, right? about a week or two ago you started to see this sort of coordinated release of analysis and articles and things like that saying hey, does anybody notice that bernie sanders might actually be in incredible position to win this primary. same sort of pundits on cnn and "new york times" basically ignored his candidacy for a long time suddenly realized wait this guy is not a joke. he has the most money. he is close or close to first in all the early states. he has real strength in the super tuesday states. is it possible he might actually win? and there was about a week of that and we were all feeling now they get it. thing come next is what are we going to do about it? not time to out organize him. not time to outfund raise him and certainly not time to explain to people why his agenda which is very popular with the voters is nothing they should believe in.

so, what do you reach for? the refuge of scoundrels lie and call him a sexist. i have to believe that even the elizabeth warren campaign knew this would be tough for people to believe. bernie sanders in 1988 as a surrogate by the way for jesse jackson in his presidential campaign in 1988 surrogate first major party candidates black man to run for president said he thought a woman could be elected president. it's a tough argument to make but what else are you going to do? >> tucker: i don't know. you will could critique his policies, which are radical. and i think deserve a debate and one of the things that enrages me that the rest of us are -- we would be enriched by it. tariffed by it and learn something that's the point of this whole stupid process inform us. y sexism, racism, it's like childish. >> yes, it is. here's the problem they tried that. where did things go wrongbl for the elizabeth warren campaign? easy, they had a good summer.be really good summer. i was afraid they had such a good summer. details of the debate about

healthcare policy. medicare for all. how are you going to pay for it. >> tucker: she will not thought it through. >> she had not thought it through. we will be able to do this without raising taxes. we will be able to do thisise in year three and then we will have a sort of option at the beginning and tried to pull a fast one. and they lost that argument decisively. >> tucker: yes. >> so badly that it tanked their campaign all the way from the height that i thought they were going to ride all the way to the nomination down to where they are in third or fourth place and leading everything to pete buttigieg.n you are losing to the boy mayor from south bend. they tried a policy argument and the problem is their arguments were bad and they couldn't win that argument. now they are looking around and thinking well, hillary clinton didn't have good policy arguments either but she had this. why don't we try that it's just not going to work. >> tucker: last question, ifif we are almost out of time, if this works and if ther: establishment led by cnn and jeffrey zucker somehow crushsh the bernie campaign on the basis of identity politics attack, what's that going to

do to the democratic primary electorate?s will they feel well-served by that.o >> there is a decent chance that is an event have that could destroy the democratic party. to the contrary what more interesting what if it doesn't work. what if you pull this gun and shoot it and we are fine and we live anyway and itn' demonstrates this is not as powerful as you people thought. from now on you better believe we are not going to be afraid of this anymore. because you tried as hard as you could and we still won. trump demonstrated that. >> tucker: i'm not a lefty or for sanders. we will all benefit if that happens. if this identity politics garbage ends here i will go to church and say a prayer. i mean it. it's that bad. >> thank you. >> tucker: what may be theme most solemn and prayerful moment in the history of this nation, nancy pelosi has finally delivered impeachment articles to the senate. a member of the senate, republican gives his views republican gives his views of what should happen next. ? ♪ ♪

some things are too important to do yourself. get customized security with 24/7 monitoring from xfinity home. awarded the best professionally installed system by cnet. simple. easy. awesome. call, click or visit a store today.

♪ >> tucker: well, after months of delays, house democrats today finally let the impeachment trial begin. they made a hilarious march over to the senate side to deliver the two approved articles like the munchkin parade in the wizard of oz. it looked like a scene from the hollywood blockbuster, hilarious. ♪ ♪

>> tucker: the munchkins have arrived. this before the march you just saw and by the way go online and watch it again. too great. nancy pelosi marked the occasion by signing the articles of impeachment with several separate pens and them handed them out like prizes. s that was a decade of the rosery. it was a prayerful occasion. over on cnn they described the pens as priceless valuables. >> you heard nancy pelosi there say, in fact, this was a sad and tragic day and then there she is holding up the pen and havingth photographies taken with those pens so, yeah, i think it was a little off message for someone who has tried to set a very serious tone and here she is posing for photographies with a pen. so probably not the most -- >> committee chairman and house managers they will have those pens for the rest of their lives. >> tucker: yeah, a moment that we will remember forever -- oh, wait, we a won't remember it next week.

it's really not like being the pen john hancock signed the declaration of independence with except of course there is no way john hancock prayed as much as nancy pelosi does. how long will the senate impeachment trial last? it's hard to say.l after four months of democrats trying to minimize hunter biden's pretty obvious role in this scandal he is at the very center of it. might be a good time to hear from him directly in testimony. and, yet, here is the strange thing someme republicans seem uninterested in hearing from hunter biden. hard to see why. it makes sense that democrats might want to shield him from public scrutiny but why would republicans want that? senator tom cotton from the state of arkansas and he joins us tonight. senator, thanks so much for coming on. >> hey, good evening,e tucker. good to be on with you. >> tucker: i'm no expert on strategy, procedure or otherwise. just an interested viewer. i would like to hear from hunter biden. why won't would he be able to?i >> yeah, well, first off,, tucker, i would just say in that lead-in you may not be an expert in strategy nancyld pelosi isn't either. the left wing media is

always celebrating her after what we saw yesterday with those gold embossed pens, i think nancy is anything but a master strategist here. >> tucker: i agree with that. >> as for hunter biden, if we're going to have any witnesses i think hunter biden would be at the very top of the list of witnesses the president would want to call. i don't know though what thehe president and his legal team have decided whether they want to call witnesses at all or whether they want to move straight to a final vote after arguments and questions from senators. obviously they will play a big role in that. one thing i can say is that would are not going to have a situation where just the democrats are calling witnesses.s. if the democrats call witnesses, then the president will be able to call witnesses as well. >> tucker: are there any outstanding -- sincere question, are there any outstanding questions you would like to see answered? given i think you probably agree with me this whole thing is like ludicrous. parts of it are kind of interesting. is there anything you would like to know? >> well, tucker, despite nancy pelosi and jerrold nadler and adam schiff's best efforts, what we heard right on the senate floor today simply does not add up to the constitutional

standard of impeaching andnd certainly not removing a president from office. we will listen to what they have to say, although i have got to say just listening to 20 minutes of adam schiff was already pretty taxing. i can't imagine 24 hours of it. but it's hard to imagine what else they mightht marshall to support their farcical process that led to this moment coming out of the house. >> tucker: right. can you imagine any scenario where the president loses republicans, any republicans in the senate, in this trial? >> i don't know, tucker. we have to listen to adam schiff and jerry nadler drone on for so long that we sue for mercy and do anything to make it end. >> tucker: you know, you have a couple just say fine, i will vote with you if you stop, in other words? [laughter] >> no, tucker, i really can't imagine that scenario. and, like i said, i'm not sure the president will even seek witnesses. you know, in a criminal trial which is not exact analogue to this trial.

>> tucker: right. >> oftentimes the defense does not put any case at all says the state's case is too weak.ft the president may very well just say the house put on a very weak case. it was a rough slipshod impeachment and the senate should just move to the final vote.. >> tucker: last question, super quick, do you think it's better for the country for the republican party, for the president, to get this over with quick or to kind of air it all out? >> hunter -- or tucker more important than the length of the trial is that the trial be fair and even-handed which the president didn't receive in the house of representatives. we do not want to set a new political standard, a precedent going forward for the ages that an enraged partisan majority in the house can ram through on a party line vote articles of impeachment and see a similar process in the senate. we want to do this in a fair and even-handed way thatat gives the president his chance to finally make his case and to teach not just this house majority in case they are thinking about impeaching donald trump

again but future house majorities that there is no political benefit to be gained in this kind ofo ramshackle impeachment process. >> tucker: i think that's a fair point. senator, thanks so much for coming on and explaining that. t >> yeah, thanks, tucker. >> tucker: well, creepy porn lawyer's presidential campaign has hit something of a speed bump. is he in prison tonight. jeffrey zucker's minions need a new project. one is making an hbo documentary.y. take a look back at the career of one of the least impressive people in this country. how did he get a tv show? good question. plus nfl star antonio brown has ruined his career with outlandish behavior. an argument that there is a double standard going on in professional sports. he will explain it when we come back. ♪ - do you have a box of video tapes, film reels, or photos,

that are degrading? legacybox professionally converts them to dvds, thumb drive, or the cloud. legacybox is simple and safe, with over half a million satisfied customers. visit legacybox.com today, and get 40% off.

rowithout the commission fees and account minimums. so, you can start investing wherever you are - even on the bus. download now and get your first stock on us. robinhood. moms love that land o' frost premium sliced meats have no by-products. [conference phone] baloney! [conference phone] has joined the call. hey baloney here. i thought this was a no by-products call? land o' frost premium. a slice above.

>> tucker: a meritocracy is fading all over america and in the media completely dead nothing proves it better than this man jeffrey zucker's marinette brian stelter known him for a long time since he was in college. a picture here of brian stelter in 2004. i can tell you as someone who has watched his career all this time amazing he has a job much less than television.wh hard to find someone dumber or more talentness. he not only has a show on cnn but a show on hbo. steltzer announced two years producing a new featureho

entitled after truth disinformation and the cost of fake news. [laughter] it's hilarious. you would think the irony alarms would be going off everywhere woo woo woo this guy works at cnn and that's a channel that spent two years pushing the russia hoax. this is a channel that believed jussie smollett's hoax and many other fake crimes. and then there was the timeim don lemon i would say charming at least lecturede his viewers on the peaceful nobility of antifa.ec >> it says it right in the name antifa. antifascism which is what they were there fighting. listen, there is no organization that's perfect. there is some violence. no one condones the violence, but there were different reasons for antifa and for these neo nazis to be there. one, racist fascists, the other group fighting racist fascists. there is a distinction there. >> tucker: um-huh. there is a distinction, yeah. antifa, good guys a few

months later lemon explaining to us perfectly fine for a mob to target high school kids for the crime of making america great again hat. f >> the maga hat carries a certain connotation that provokes a conditioned reaction from many people, especially from marginalized people. >> tucker: got it? violence good, red hats bad. just last week cnn settled the lawsuit. i wonder if this is in the hbo documentary with covington student nic sandmann they tried to destroy his life and these are the people lecturing you about fake news. amazing. author of the book panic attack he joins us tonight. hey, robbie. this does seem a little bit preposterous, right? this is like hiring a homeless guy as your realtor. [laughter] bernie madoff as your financial advisor. this kid is lecturing us on fake news. >> i wonder if the documentary will cover any of the myriad, multiple w

errors false news stories, misleading stories, post truth world that we live in according to them. i wonder if their own role in that will be chronicled.in i think that's the annoying thing, right? they act like everything was fine and then all of a sudden trump and the rightht wing media they created this dispope yahweh live in where you can't trust any information and we are just these, you know, these poor lost souls trying to deliver you the truth. we are not ideological we are above the fray. that's their message. i don't think anyone believes that and i don't think people on the left believe that after this weekek watching cnn's hosts push this narrative invented by what i assume is elizabeth warren's campaign staff thatis bernie told her a woman couldn't win and you saw them ask, you know, bernie has asked about it. he denies it. and then warren is not asked about it.s the question that she got framed it as if it was true, which is important because the activist left, the progressives, believe that

you cannot question people who are claiming some kind of victim status. so that was a subtle example of activism rather than journalism kind of out in the open for everyone. it was an important momenthe that should really just -- it's a black eye on their organization. >> tucker: you think it would slow them down a little bit. you think they would have some scintilla of self-awareness, right? if i just paid millions of dollars to a high school kid for slandering him i might pull back before lecturing other people about fake s news. their aggression seems to only increase. >> absolutely. you see and i read articles all the time about the horrifying world we live in that is more racist and sexist than ever before. that hate crimes are off the chart. even as we see these things get debunked from time to time.he even as we see the statistics shown to be misleading. they are living in this world where everything is so bad that it's just not like historically true. they have this ideologicalal conviction that things must

be the worst they have ever been. and i keep thinking there was misleading news out there by the way before social media existed, before the moment we live in, newspapers have been, you know, convincing the american public to support stupid things for decades, probably centuries. it's just not -- it's alarmism and that's kind offus what they are promoting. >> tucker: it's being rewarded. i want to live in a world where impressive people rise to the top and unimpressive people should be parking my car. brian seltzer should be parking my car but he has an hbo show. robby, thank you. >> my pleasure.bb >> tucker: nfl wide receiver antonio brown has enough talent to be one of the world's highest paid athletes very talented currently he doesn't have a job. cut off from multiple teams for bad behavior that would include sexual assault.

he dropped his own agent him delivering a profanity laced tirade to cops in front of his kids. watch. >> you [bleep] white [bleep] out of here. here. you as well. [bleep] [bleep] get the [bleep] out of here. get the [bleep] off my property you [bleep] get the [bleep] out of here. i love you, poppy. i love you. police get the [bleep] out of here. look at the little crackersti don't get no justice for no [bleep]. get out of here. get out of here, cracker. >> and just today another nfl player, odell beckham jr. was hit with arrest warrant for slapping the bottom of a security guard at the college football championship. does this add up to anything?? jason whitlock is in los angeles tonight. he hosts speak for yourself. we are always grateful to have him here. thanks for coming on. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: i don't want read into anything beyond what it deserves in this case isis t there a trend we should be aware of. >> i think there is with

odell beckham jr. and antonio brown, these are two guys that are constantly trying to build their social media brand.tl they want to be bigger and bigger influencers. and that's going on with a lot of professional athletes. we have moved from athletes being role models to being influencers. influencers are there to basically promote product, to build a following and convince their following to buy product. >> tucker: you are describing a business that they are running? >> yeah. absolutely. the social media brand influencer is their goal andnd they don't care what measures they have to go to to get there. so, that's why they keep putting out viral producto over social media ab., antonio brown put that video out of him talking this abusively in front of his kids.im >> tucker: he sent that out. >> yeah. he put it on his instagram page. he filmed it. had someone film it and he

put it out.t it's content made to go viral because this guy is addicted to social media and building a social media following. these are two of the biggest nfl players with social media brand and that's why they keep doing things to go viral. odell beckham jr. he was handing out wads of cash on the playing field after the national championship game. he knows that's illegal. he knows he is being filmed. it's a viral moment to build up o.b.j. and his brand. the goal for a lot of these athletes and particularly wide receivers in the nfl, becomes a big a brand as you can be. try to be the mail version of kim kardashian, lindsey lohan, paris hilton, it's not about being a role model. a role model and that's what athletes used to aspire to be was about modeling behavior for young people to emulate. influencers it's about building as big a following as you can and convincing that following buy sneakers, buy whatever product.

>> tucker: you are saying infamy is as valuable and notoriety. screaming obscenities in front of kids makes you money? >> absolutely. have you not been watching this reality world. building tv shows around a housewives attacking each other and showing all thee dysfunction within their family. a.b. is -- look, a.b. has, i think, some mental health issues, no question. you got to question whether both of these guys maybe have some chemical issues or substance abuse issues if you just look at their behavior over and over again. but, primarilyri they are addicted to their cell phones and addicted to social media. they are addicted to becoming more and more infamous building a bigger following. kim kardashian became famous because of a sex tape. this cussing out of the police. having some incident in front of your home with kids there, anything to build to

get people to look at you and follow you and for your brand to become bigger and bigger on social media a lot of these guys see it as a good thing. >> tucker: i assume there is a whole lot of parasites making money off these guys. >> o.b. has contract with nike pays him millions of dollars. general this that money is spent on basketball players because they sell gym shoes. o.b. would buy different watch before the game watch companies wanted to be attached to him. his social media game is so big. b.a.b. had all of thesee legal issues and allegations, he was another guy through his instagram page that was pushing product. that's -- these guys aren't really concentrating on being great football players at this point.oo it's about can football help me build a brand that i don't need football and i can sell product and become this social media

millionaire that can push products down consumer's throats? >> tucker: every time you come on you say something so far out it shocks me it turns out to be true. >> this is true. >> tucker: it's hard to believe that goes on in the country. >> i just want to say this before i go, i started outli parking cars, tucker. [laughter] >> tucker: but now look what you are doing. that's the point.. that guy is moving in the opposite direction. i was a dishwasher. i get it. great to see you. jason whitlock. >> thank you for having me. >> tucker: the press has seriously avoided investigating ilhan omar's past. the fbi apparently is picking up that thread. that's next. first, final exam. trace gallagher brings you breaking news on this show all the time. e how well has he followed the weirder news of the last week. he faces off against judge jeanine next. >> trace: going to be awesome. is aex common flush physical flush

♪ >> tucker: time now for final exam the most charming put reputations on the line in a struggle to win prizes from the tucker carlson.com store. this week's first contestant is judge jeanine pirro host of justice with judge jeanine. facing formidablet challenger. a man admired by every person in this buildingg trace gallagher. >> gosh. now when i get smoked i will feel better. >> yep. >> tucker: i don't know. i'm not even going to guess on this. >> i'm going to guess, do you know why? he has done the news four.. days this week. he knows all the news. >> she is intimidating me. >> no, you are intimidating me. >> leading the witness. going on 10 minutes. >> tucker: i love. this. >> let's go. >> tucker: you know the rules. read it for our viewers. hand on buzzers, i ask the

question. first one on the buzzer. wait until i finish asking the question before you answer. every correct answer is worth a single point. each incorrect answer detracts a point from your total. first to five wins. are you ready? >> ready. >> tucker: okay. question one is multiple choice. you have to wait for all the options. here it is michael bloomberg's social mediaia team went a little crazy the most recent debate and super imposed his face on to a kind of food was it a a hot dog, b, a meatball or c a potato? >> trace gallagher. >> trace: that was a potato. >> tucker: was mike bloomberg's face super imposed upon a potato?o? >> i think we can put one of them up which meatball looks like mike? >> i don't know. >> i like meatballs. [laughter] >> the one in the front. >> meatball carved. >> people thought -- they thought that you were hacked but it wasn't hacked.

>> trace: it was a meatball. >> judge jeanine: all that for a meatball? >> judge: you lost a point. >> trace: i know, i told you. >> tucker: question two, another multiple choice and i promise it didn't come from the onion. this is real. the president said at a press conference recently that he received inspiration trade deal village people song. re was it a in the navy? was it b. macho man or was it ymca judge jeanine? >> judge jeanine: ymca probably in the navy but i'm going to stick with ymca. >> tucker: is it fun to stay at the ymca. >> i'm good at names usmca like the song ymca. nobody could remember usmca. think of the song ymca. they don't remember the previous name a bad deal, okay?

commonly known as nafta. >> trace: nicely done, judge. >> judge jeanine: thank you very much. >> tucker: nice. all right, question three. yet another multiple choice. cheetos, the snack brand, has come up for a name forto the residue left on your fingers after you finish eating a bag of them. is the name cheeto dust a? b, cheese soot, or c cheetle.he >> cheetle. >> least likely is it correct? >> cheetos officially giving a name to the dusty cheese residue stuck on your fingers after eating the snacks. >> yeah. >> it's gross. calling it cheetle. orange and red dust in a moment of true cheetle. >> judge jeanine: i want a complaint. you won. here's the problem. did you see that i hit this and it didn't ring? >> tucker: i didn't see that i'm not in charge of the equipment.

>> judge jeanine: it's a fix. >> tucker: producers back in my ear at the sioux falls you buzzed in after trace.k >> judge jeanine: that could be it. >> tucker: passing the buck. keep in mind, this is not a multiple choice, just one potential answer. here it is. on jeopardy this week contestants were shown a photography of a democratic member of congress well known for his fighting with the president. the contestants were asked to identify him and yet not a single contestant knew who he was. who was the california representative in question? i'm sorry, what are our judges saying? i'm sorry, our judges aree saying, judge, that your premature button smack. >> judge jeanine: you took a pause. >> tucker: i'm just telling you. look, trace gallagher? >> trace: the answer is adam schiff. >> tucker: is it adam schiff? to the tape. >> judge jeanine: yes.

>> u.s. representatives for 12. >> 1/53rd of california's house delegation is this intelligence committee chairman. [buzzer] his name is adam schiff. back to you, veronica. >> judge jeanine: they didn't know it by the way. >> trace: we are tied. >> tucker: going into the final question sudden death result tonight. this is a multiple choice so please wait until all the options are presented before you answer. here it is.. senator elizabeth warren of massachusetts noticed the true measure of a candidate's success and that, of course, is selfies, not votes or fundraising, selfies, she has been bragging about taking a lot of selfies with her supporters. how many selfies hasa elizabeth warren taken is it a? 60,000? is it b 80000? is it c 100000 selfies? trace gallagher? >> trace: 100,000 selfies says elizabeth warren. >> tucker: 100,000 selfies. now, remember, this is self-reported so we can't verify. >> judge jeanine: she

exaggerates everything. i'm sure it's right. >> tucker: is trace correct to the tape? >> i should start out by saying don't comment onke polls and i actually don't really look at them. but, i will tell you this: the best part of this whole year has been doing what i do, which is getting out and doing town halls. it's reaching out to people. i'm closing in on 200 town halls. we have already shot past 100,000 selfies. >> judge jeanine: congratula tions. >> trace: woo! >> tucker: she doesn't lookk at polls but she counts selfies. >> tucker: trace, congratulations. outstanding. >> like beating ali back in the 1970s. >> judge jeanine: congratula tions. >> trace: she is the champ. >> judge jeanine: look at the mug. tell him what he wins. >> tucker: you win our coveted eric wemple mug. you will drink coffee from it as soon as we can get itte

to you which will be soon. thank you very much. >> trace: thanks, tucker, thank you. >> tucker: that's it for it tune in all week to see if you can beat our experts. plus, i recently appeared on a special episode of the quiz show on fox nation. they have a quiz show, too. we are not going to say if it's better or worse. pretty good. be sure to check it out. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪

♪ >> tucker: the press is essentially ignoring the story. but now, the fbi reportedly is investigating. journalists will not. chief breaking news correspondent, trace gallagher joins us. >> now, democratic congresswoman, ilhan omar is being looked at by customs and u immigration enforcement. the inspector general for the department of education. they are reporting that the allegations include tax fraud, student loan fraud. and possibly bigamy. the investigation is focused on her 2009 marriage. judicial law claims it is her biological brother.

now, there is allegations the marriage might also have been used to obtain illegal student loans and that while she was married to him, she allegedly filed illegal joint tax returns from ahmed hersey. he is the father of her children. she separated from him in 2008, then legally married him in 2018 before legally divorcing him. she calls the allegations baseless, yet, she has refused to turn over any documents. though, soon, she may be compelled to turn over those documents. >> tucker: we will continue to follow that story. thanks and congrats. that's it for us. every night, 8:00 p.m. weeknights, the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. don't forget to dvr the show if you can figure out how that

works. there's a lot more there. we will cover it. good night from los angeles. sean hannity takes over. >> sean: did you try out in-n-out burger? yes or no? >> four times. breakfast, lunch, dinner. they are the best. >> sean: don't forget, animal style double-double. cheese. welcome to "hannity." a fox news alert. get this. james comey, i hope you are sitting down for this. big breaking news, only moments ago, federal prosecutors are reportedly investigating high-level leaks, classified material from the fbi and the super patriot himself, according to reports is likely the target of a criminal probe. remember, only a few months ago in an unrelated case, the doj inspector general referred them

for prosecution