about russia collusion? doubt it. if humpty and his wannabe assistant, exposed by his own journalism, watch your own network. let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham, big show tonight. >> laura: hannity, i know you are very upset about thed, jim comey developments. i have one of those fruit bouquets on its way to you because i know you are very broken up by the investigation into comey's leaks. why did it take them so long? that's my question. >> sean: yeah, i think we know. lack of candor, government documents, i think that would put all of us in jail. >> laura: those were his personal documents, in the sedan paid for by the u.s. taxpayer. have a good night. great show, as always. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle" from washington. this is going to be the go-toho hour for every key twist and turn of this impeachment farce.n the political, the cultural, the legal, all here. senators now sworn in.

disturbing new reports emerging about what may be in mcconnell's rules governing the trial. our legal team weighs in. it's an all star one. plus, senator martha mcsally is here exclusively to respond to the firestorm -- i don't know if you saw this today -- created by her concentration, is like five seconds, with a cnn reporter. it was the talk of capitol hill today.nc they can dish it out but can't take it. tonight, the resistance thinks they have two more silver bullets to take down the trump presidency. they are here to explain whyda those silver bullets are blanks. and my "angle" comes later in the hour it, i like when that happens, mixes it up. i will explain what kind of future we're in for if democrats regain power in november. but first, mcconnell's senate resolution that lays out the rules for impeachment is going to be introduced formally on tuesday.

a couple of different sources in the senate are telling us that chuck schumer has not yet seen the rules, the specifics. again, they can always be amended. but the rules are in the final stages in the form of this overall resolution. now, they will be debated next week at some point, it will include things like how long each side has to advance its case, how long to offer a rebuttal, and more. well, another report emerging today that indicates that three g.o.p. senators, romney, murkowski, and collins, want or maybe even demand a vote on whether witnesses will be called. but mcconnell has also promised to model the trial rules after the clinton impeachment rules. seems really smart, a smart thing for him to do. but now we are learning his resolution as of tonight will not include a provision for a motion to dismiss, which was part of the clinton impeachment resolution. bob byrd at the time pushed for that.

now, if this is true, it's a huge mistake. a motion to dismiss could be voted on, well, of course before any opening arguments are made, the white house counsel could just move. that will probably fail. or it could be made after w opening arguments, but before any vote on whether any witnesses should appear, any other matter. as we've documented, we've done this extensively this week, these articles, to anyone who is fair, and not just a rank, trump-hitting partisan, they are not just efficient on their face. i actually think they are fraudulent. right up to yesterday when nancy pelosi purposely again pulled a schiff and misquoted the transcript. the fraudulent articles to ana full-blown trial in the senate? in my view, it rewards the house his own lawlessness on this, and rank bias. republicans need to do what they did during the kavanaugh hearing. they united in this travesty now. here's why.

the election is just a blink away. democrats are clearly afraid that if they don't remove trump, hope they throw something against the wall and it will stick in the next couple of weeks, he is going to trounce them again.ro the debate the other night -- i actually started to feel sorrywe for joe biden up there. this resolution should be tweaked, amended, whatever you call it. follow the clinton impeachment model. robbed me, collins, lamar alexander, do they really want to go to their home state and say, oh, yeah, we want -- we want the president to have two endure more witnesses that weren't even discussed or talked to at all in the house. they really want to go to utah and make that argument? or tennessee to make that argument?ou that is how mitch mcconnell should put it to them.o a shorter trial with a motion te dismiss right at the top or after the first initial arguments are put on by the house impeachment managers and white house counsel,

pat cipollone. here now is senator martha mcsally, republican from arizona, a juror -- sworn in today -- and the impeachment trial. before we get your thoughts on what i just said, the senate should do, even understanding there are a few stragglers, i want to ask you about this. >> senator mcsally, should be senate consider new evidence is part of the impeachment trial? >> man, you are a liberal hack. i'm not talking to you. >> you are not going to comment? >> laura: [laughs] you heard that, "you are a liberal hack."u based on the media reaction,ac you'd have thought manu raju -- >> she calls him a nasty name. >> prize-winning excellent journalist. >> nobody looks at him with a real, objective lens, and sees anything but objectivity.

this is not a biased reporter.s, >> laura: [laughs] senator, do you regret what you said?no >> no, laura, i do not. i said it again as i went in. you are a liberal hack, buddy. you know, these cnn reporters, many of them around the capital, they are so biased. they are so in cahoots with the democrats, they still can't stand the president, and they run around trying to chase republicans and asked trapping questions.d i'm a fighter pilot.ar i call it like it is. that is what we see out of the mainstream media, and especially cnn, every single day, soll obviously, i'm going to tell the truth, and i did it today, and it's laughable. >> laura: they were saying you've gone full trump. >> they've also said it was unbecoming a senator and i lashed out. >> laura: i have a question. what do they do on a daily basis? they called trump a russian asset, the call all of you hacks on a daily basis. and they always say, well,

sources tell us, or what we understand, or people are saying. meanwhile, it's just the people at the cnn, you know, producers meeting. w >> exactly, and then the democrat senators walked by, and they say hi, how are you today? they chase after the republicans. it's ridiculous. are there cheerleading the democrats, they hate the president. >> laura: they say it is because you are in a tight race and you will lose in november to the astronaut.ic >> i speak the truth, and i wile continue to do it. i've done it my whole life. >> laura: wolf blitzer commented, he interviewed the victim here, manu raju. you are strong, but i think he could take you. they were demanding. they are demanding somethingco from you. watch. >> i take it she or her staff, no one has reached out to apologize to you, have they? >> i have not heard from them at all. >> if they did the right thing, she would personally call youe and say i'm sorry. that's an awful thing she did.

>> laura: i think they should apologize to james earl jones, he should get his voice-over back. >> they have a lot of apologizing to do, and they should be filing the reports with the dnc. >> laura: i want to ask, my concern about opening thee pandora's box, 11th hour witnesses, text messages from a guy who is obviously trying to get his sentence reduced, scribble-scrabble on a vienna notepad from the ritz-carlton, and then the republican moderates want to have a vote on witnesses. why do the republicans always do this nonsense, and democrats always stay together? >> well, laura, we are trying to stay together, and that is thes intent of the vote we are going to take on monday. hundred senators under president clinton voted for the process to start going. the vast majority is going to be just like clinton, but chuck schumer and others,

obviously, are not wanting to be with us, so we are trying to unite as a g.o.p. you know, everything schumer is doing right now, is not about president trump. thought about the constitution. it's not about a fair trial. he just wants power. >> laura: what about manu raju's question? they want witnesses? >> i want a fair trial.. >> laura: you can call me a conservative hack, but do you want witnesses, yes or no? why are you telling us? >> because we are going to vote on tuesday to start the trial, and let them present --o? >> laura: how are you going to vote on the motion for more witnesses?s?ayay >> we are going to get to that. >> laura: kind of an easy question, don't you think? >> we will proceed forward on that point -- >> laura: you're not going to vote with romney and the others? >> a final vote with strong unity after phase one is complete. >> laura: okay, well, to go for a lev parnas as the silver bullet in this case, that is it smacks of michael avenatti. we will get back to that. michael cohen, michael avenatti, lev parnas, they should start a rock group together.

>> there has to be parity. whoever they are asking for, president trump's lawyers and the defense get to also -- >> laura: i will see you a john bolton, and i will raise you a hunter biden. >> it's fairness.: it's parity. >> laura: senator, thank you for missing your plane tonight b i'm going tomorrow. i really appreciate it. i don't expect an apology comino from you anytime soon. speaking of the senate, democrats in the upper chamber raised in the impeachment drama to the next level. >> when the chief justice walked in, you could feel the weight of the moment. i saw members on both sides of the aisle visibly gulp.ei >> a solemn moment for all of us, but the moment when the very weight of history becomes clear. >> right now, it is incumbent on the united states senate to do the work of upholding america's constitution and our fair system of justice. >> it was a knot in my stomach when the chief justice came in

to the chamber and thens pronounced the name "donald john trump." >> laura: okay, first of all, i cannot believe he's a senator from my home state of connecticut. connecticut, what are you doing? it doesn't not my stomach, kellyanne conway, from the white house stopping by. look, i think they are desperately puffing up the historic nature of this. of course it is historic. it doesn't happen very often. but it's historic because it is. the first partisan impeachment of this type, with no unity in o the senate for clearly procedures or resolutions, that is not going to be possible, as they had with clinton. but there desperately trying to puffed this up.es >> there is a tinge of sanctimony, not, not solemnity. they also failed to bring the public along, public opinion,he and failed to bring republicans along in the house, and now, they are in the senate with this

very partisan, two articles of impeachment that don't really say anything, put them on post-it note. they could have sent a post-it note, not the walk across the halls of congress. we respect the process in the senate, laura. we respect to the fact that leader mcconnell and others are going to engage. i will tell you something about white house counsel and his team. they are ready.ac they are prepared. while everyone else is preening in front of the cameras nightt after night, tell you what will happen, what did happen, what won't happen, they've been working in quiet, around-the-clock, to be preparel for the senate trial. and the trial in the senate will be a more familiar processrk to americans. they know what a trial is. they know what judges and juries do, they know what witnesses and evidence means. >> laura: its political. >> completely known to americans. you talk about making history this week, donald trump made history. the trade deal with china -- >> laura: we had that last night, it was amazing.g. you know, i like how we say the tale of two leaders, a tale of

two signings, it was something -- >> with their pens. >> laura: i'm going to get to this later, but it's like they are the revenge party, and the republicans right now are the results party. >> what matters to americans. >> laura: i want to show you how tainted even historians have become who are trotted on cable news to talk about this. watch. >> the country has a president who operates as an outlaw. we haven't had an outlaw president before, and that is what you have with donald trump. outlaws in american history get their fans, fans, billy the kid or al capone, donald trump may be in that's world.ru >> but nobody interjects. that's what i can't understand. people saying something on live tv, but you have to pull them back and say, wait a second, wes can't he say that on our networe because you are not revealing facts, you are not providing news. you are providing your opinion, and your wishful thinking. you've been showing clips of bill clinton, to have to say, you and i were part of that.

we were around. i think one person in washington can't wait for impeachment to be over has got to be bill clinton. >> laura: all of the old clips. >> andrew johnson isn't here. really get it taken to him. >> laura: bernie sanders is really upset, by the way. i don't know if you've seen this, but he knows the trial is going to take him off the trail. >> going to take him off the trail, conserving his energy. >> i would rather be in iowa today. there's a caucus there in two and a half weeks. i would rather be in new hampshire. nevada, so forth. i swear a constitutional oath as a united states senator to do my job. >> there's nothing in the constitution that says you should be a socialist country, by the way. give all of our money to medicare for all or the greenot new deal., he would rather be in iowa. it sounds like he already knows how he's going to vote. he things it's an add water and stir process, which is itself

offensive. people keep comparing the impeachment process is on the rules, but you can't compare the fact pattern. if your viewers know how to tune to cnn, how to change the channel, they did an amazing documentary recently, where bill clinton had his personal secretary saying hide these gifts under your bed that i gave to monica lewinsky.on i was never really alone with her, was i?? there is nothing like that here. i think that is why the public is losing interest in the impeachment, but also, according to an "usa today" poll, 11 out of 12 on the most important issues to your family. >> laura: i went back and watched, everyone saying it was not going to happen, trump is going to bubble the trade deals. my favorite, the tariffs were going to tank the economy. he could have kept the tariffs on the economy. >> two trade deals done, two terrorists out, two supreme court justices -- >> laura: are you doing at 2020 numerology thing for us tonight?

>> not really, just stating the facts. >> laura: thank you for stopping by. all right, "the new york post" editorial board is questioning s adam schiff's role as the leadnk impeachment prosecutor, writing late yesterday, "a normal court with reject a dishonest prosecutor like schiff. he's been lying to the world for years in his nonstop campaign to smear president." joining me, sol wisenberg, former deputy whitewater independent counsel, and harmeet dhillon, trump 2020 advisory board member. what do you make of nancy's impeachment managers, as a whole? >> well, i think the way they are handling the impeachment, not just the managers, but particularly speaker pelosi, it reminds me a lot about they tried to do withe brett kavanaugh, in the sense that they are bringing stuff in, supposedly dramatic information at the very last minute, when it really should be beyond the deadline, and they are dubious witnesses, and they are sleazy t witnesses. the whole thing is like a hot mess.

as i said the other night, she is not serious. there was a way to have handled this seriously from the very beginning, and she blew it. so now they are desperate, and n they're pulling out all the stops. >> laura: harmeet, according to pelosi, the impeachment trial isn't actually about proof or evidence. >> is not a question of proof, it's what allegations have been made, and that has to be subjected to scrutiny as to how we go forward. >> laura: harmeet, i don't understand, she is quoting old limericks and rhymes yesterday, and now, we need a special interpreter for nancy. >> it's total gibberish, laura, and those trial lawyers are a looking at this and just cringing. it is absolutely a violation of every principle that we hold dear. yes, there are deadlines, judges impose rules, there is due

process, and there are no surprise witnesses. this isn't perry mason in real life. the whole thing is just such a grab bag of mismatch of garbage that it really reflects poorly on the congress as a body and on the entire process. g i'm afraid it's going to undermine americans respect forr the entire system of government that we have. >> laura: sol, back to this motion to dismiss, i'm on this, i can't drop this issue, but my sources told me tonight, it is m not in the resolution as it is currently drafted, they can amend it and i think ever who cares about this should put pressure on the senate to amend this and put a motion to dismiss is a vote before the witness vote. what are your thoughts on that? >> you know, you were talking about the clinton case earlier, and at first they were going to do it like that and do a motion to dismiss early on, and they changed it so it could be brought at any time. ultimately, near the very end,

after three witnesses had given depositions, they did allow a t motion to dismiss. i think, at this point, laura, whether it is in the rules are not, it's just not going to work early on because apparently you've got four or five republican senators who aren't going to go for it, and they probably think -- either that it's not right or that it's not a good political move. i'm not as scared as some other people are about calling witnesses. be careful what you ask for. >> laura: you and i are on the same page. opens up a possible pen pandora's box. harmeet, are you with me, the motion to -- i went back and read the resolution that was passed and agreed to unanimously by daschle and trent lott in 1998. >> i agree with you, laura, and i also agree this is probably a political decision by the fence sitters on the republican side,8 but it is not the end of the world, because we have tools. in real court, a motion forr

summary evidence, judgment after evidence, but there are ways toh dismiss a defective prosecution, and hopefully we will be able to do that after these people are placated with the initial vote. when we open up witness lists, hopefully it will be reciprocal. >> laura: okay.is sol, i don't trust republicans to negotiate a good deal on this. i love mitch mcconnell, i think he's really smart. you just never know. and these guys aren't trial lawyers.ch you guys are in court all the time. >> defendants get to call witnesses in trials. the whole idea that only the house managers would get to call witnesses is just a joke. a joke. >> we all agree on that. >> laura: jeffrey toobin says basically everyone is afraid. if they don't want to call witnesses, they are afraid. i think we don't want to insult this process or create a precedent for a fraudulent impeachment to go forward.ai nu raju, or justank you for

mean? later in the show, we reveal the evidence that shows the bias. up next -- this is like a running joke with these earrings falling off, tell you about that later. democrats think they have new against trump. a shady character named lev parnas. my next guests say not so fast. strassel, hemingway, and york explain why the left's supposedly silver bullets are really blanks. stay there. silver bullets are ry planks.

♪

some things are too important to do yourself. get customized security with 24/7 monitoring from xfinity home. awarded the best professionally installed system by cnet. simple. easy. awesome. call, click or visit a store today. ♪ >> laura: well, the resistance thinks it has two shiny new silver bullets to take down trump. the phrases lev parnas, the shady ukrainian former associate of rudy giuliani who is the talk of a town after his interviews

on msnbc and cnn and others. >> stunning new allegations emerged that associate of rudy giuliani directly implicates trump. >> it's hard to conceive of a t more relevant, a more material witness and lev parnas. the spotlight needs to be on 100 senators demanding to hear more from parnas. >> laura: who is this guy? mr. parnas has been indicted for violating campaign finance regulations, started a companyna in 2013 called "fraud guarantee," that's my favorite, two years after being accused of fraud. don't worry, to the resistance, he's a lot more credible than trump. >> today, trump denied knowing lev parnas, despite having multiple photos with him. parnas says the president was aware of his efforts to get dirt on the bidens and was in close coordination of giuliani, but today, trump said he doesn't think they've ever spoken.n. >> laura: to every person you ever took a photo with, you know intimately. joining me now, molly henning miller, senior editor at

"the federalist." byron york, she political correspondent for the "washington examiner," and kimberley strassel, "wall street journal" editorial board member. all fox news contributors. these folks risk being --ki just like with avennati. >> this late information. one of the things that was interesting about the kavanaugh smear campaign as it began with something that had no evidence but was at least kind of plausible. didn't get really crazy into the end when avenatti and his client, julie swetnick, were making truly outrageous allegations. lev parnas going straight to the julie swetnick phase of, operations, rather than going through something more reasonable. it's interesting, though, that so many people in the resistance cling to these people who claim to have evidence that will truly, finally bring down president trump, no matter how many times it blows up in their face. c >> laura: byron, they are posing for photos with parnas.pr they were smearing him just a month ago, now posing for photos. tweeting about it.

>> it's obvious credibility problems. remember the guy who claimed that devin nunes went to vienna in december 2018 and met with viktor shokin, the former prosecutor over there. did not happen at all. the person who claimed that was lev parnas. also alleged contacts with president trump. obviously, he's under indictment. if there's anybody you want to stay away from right now, it would be lev parnas. >> laura: giuliani should have stayed away from him. >> exactly. >> laura: giuliani, these unsavory characters, why is he hanging out? i was in ukraine in 1983, it was a dark time then. corruption, still, all of the east bloc countries still have problems.. kim, this is quite something, t when you have the media clinging to this -- it's like the last buoy of hope. lev parnas.

they keep promising more tidbits, but not mentioning in these interviews any of the points that byron just made about his past or his credibility. never even mentioning it in the intros. >> yeah, and you know the problem too for the media is that this goes beyond the question of lev parnas' credibility. that's a big first strike. but also, the information he claims to impart is irrelevant or unbelievable, right, in that part of this is supposedly the notes that he scribbled. we don't know when they were or in what context, to the extent they might apply to something -- it's to rudy giuliani's activities, which rudy giuliani was completely open about the entire time he was doing. that's -- also, he claims to suggest that he knows what was going through donald trump's mind. what bill barr knew. what mike pence knew. we've got people who are farwh closer to the president in lev parnas who would not seek to make that claim.

this is sort of a fantastical tale. >> laura: mollie, of course the president knew. pence was in on it. every twitter conspiracy theory was coming out of lev parnas on television last night. he has no first-hand knowledge about what trump knew, maybe giuliani said something -- we don't know, have no idea. >> the media do have some responsibility here. you are supposed to vet allegations and they are made, not just air them and run wild with them. they are not doing in this case. at the same time the care about this information. >> laura: the second silver bullet, the findings from the government accountability office. >> we are very significant breaking news just in. >> nonpartisan independent arm of the government called the government accountability office concluded that the trump administration broke the law when it withheld security aid te ukraine last year. >> i can't wait for reporters to get microphones in front of a lot of senators, and this is really going to be hard for them

to digest and ignore. >> laura: well, just a few problems. one, this is a toothless declaration. two, obama's gao found he brokes regulations. and it's part of the legislative branch, so it's not surprising they would side with congress. byron, do you remember obama's allegations getting covered? >> they came up with bribery, that's when the test of the best. they did not come up with the impoundment control act, which is the law the president is accused of, the omb is accused of breaking. this is a dispute between the branches of government, and especially on spending, this dispute goes back -- these kind of disputes go back centuries between president and congress on how to spend the money. >> laura: it's embarrassing, though, that the media don't even bother to couch this in terms of, well, of course, bill clinton -- or this is a legislative, you know, group,

outfit. nothing. not even a reference to that. >> not to mention the actual quality of what they're saying.e they say delaying within the same fiscal year is somehow breaking the law. >> laura: nice try. i want your thoughts on the breaking news tonight from a law york times, law enforcement scrutinizing two articles with mr. comey published. hackers obtained the document and provided it to the fbi, and both its existence and thezi collection of it were highly classified secrets. kim, comey keeps saying he's done nothing wrong. why do we keep finding out, i guess he is under investigation? >> yeah, we will see if he is or not. to me, comey aside, this is almost another media story. even "the new york times" admitted they seemed to -- it appeared he was under investigation.mo to me, the entire tenor of that story was designed to enable another hit on bill barr, to

suggest that somehow the department of justice was reaching way back. >> laura: reaching way back, mollie, we just lost the satellite. >> the headline said it was a year's worth old situation. they are investigating something that happened a month before he was fired. only from 2017. the fact is that the russiath roax, which is very dangerous and damaging to the republic, was fed by leaks. this is a story that was presumably leaked by comey's own team to make it look like he is okay and it's a continuation. >> and we know comey was a leaker. wrote the memo about his talk with the president, gave it to a friend for the purpose of giving it to the near times. >> laura: heard it from a friend, who heard it from a g friend. kim, byron, mollie, thank you. beyond the impeachment hysteria, let's pull back the curtain what is going to happen if, in november, the worst possible thing could happen. the radicals take power.

matt schlapp, chris hahn react to it. don't go away.

♪ >> laura: hope and change becomes revenge and pain. that's the focus of tonight's "angle."re tonight, i want you to think beyond all the procedural wrangling of impeachment we talked about earlier in the show and i want to put your mind on the big picture, what is really

at stake for america, for your kids and your grandkids. by that, i mean what we stand to lose if the radicals -- you know, those people who dragged us through this obscene impeachment? if they were to take power in november. well, yesterday, nancy pelosi acted, of course, like the part of an aggrieved patriot. >> we pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic,, for which it stands. that is what our nation is. that was the decision of our founders. listen, my children, and you will hear, the midnight ride of paul revere. listen, my children, and you will hear about an assault on the constitution. the present takes a special oath that was taken byn, president george washington, the patriarch of our country. >> laura: in case we didn't know what it oath was, she had to show us. nice try, san fran grand nan.

of course, her party is morning tune with saul alinsky instead of james madison. on cnn, a couple nights ago, they gave us a sneak preview and how they plan to tank the economy. >> i will stop all new drilling and mining on federal lands and dfshore drilling. >> my plan cost $1.5 trillion over it decade. no small sum. >> to reinstate and rebuild obamacare, an option that costs $700 billion over ten years. >> raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. we are going to have a green new deal. that is what democratic socialism is about coming that will win this election. >> laura: kids, get off my lawn. i guess bernie never really returned from his honeymoon in the soviet union.id bye-bye, record unemployment. bye-bye, wage growth. hello, welfare and gas lines. it's not just the economy

democrats plan to destroy while pretending to be these grand patriots, like nancy and her styrofoam flag there. freedom of speech and religion will be under constant assault. >> there can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break, for anyone or any institution, any organization in america that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us. >> protecting the right of a woman to be able to make decisions about her own body, it's fundamentally what we do and what we stand for, as a democratic party. >> laura: of course, human rights, children, babies -- no. of course, the left subscribes to their own type of religious orthodoxy. and they bow down at the planetary altar. >> we have to fight climate change with such urgency. >> climate is my number one priority. >> climate change threatens every living thing on this

planet. >> laura: remember, the left climate change police, they aggressively enforce the dogma. even a supposedly more centrist joe biden has had to adopt their lingo. >> we should be investing in infrastructure that raises roads, makes sure we are in a position that every new highway bill is a green highway. >> laura: at this rate, someone like greta thunberg will be his running mate. >> how dare you. >> laura: okay, we need a longer sound bite. sorry. i almost said greta van susteren, but she is my friend, i didn't mean to say that. there are no more moderate democrats left, though. remember governor blackface northam of virginia? he billed himself as a pragmatic, middle-of-the-roader? that lasted 5 minutes, now he is moving against gun rights, advocated infanticide, and running roughshod over religious freedom. some a moderate.

the left stuck by him after the kkk blackface yearbook photo, but the price was a loyalty oath to radicalism. so again, if the democrats take the white house in november, they are going to move against all inconvenient speech. and moderates and never trumpers, you think you're going to get a free pass because you didn't like how? good luck.u et just look at what they're doing to poor meghan mccain over at "the view." chuckled as near times piece just published. "the view" has a meghan mccain problem. the problem is with miss mccain still on the show. there's not much to enjoy. again, repeat, mccain doesn't even like trump. so it doesn't matter if you think you are reasonable today, as a republican. the left will always come for you, in the end. the positive coverage, people receiving now like mitt, susan, lisa, lamar, that's all because the left hates trump more than

you do. when he's gone, so will your green room passed to all of the networks. heck, the left is soo consumed with hatred for trump at all of you who support him, they won't even tolerate a hint of objectivity or balance. earlier this week, mbc's larry t the liberal cnn. >> one-third of the people on their payroll love trump. it's one of the reason trump kind of wants you to watch cnn instead of msnbc, because we don't bring on myers. i don't bring on a liar. i won't do that. >> laura: never. >> donald trump loan documents o there show that he has cosigners. the cosigners are russian oligarchs. >> what? really? >> last night on the show, i discussed information that wasn't ready for reporting. i did not go through the rigorous verification and standards process here at msnbc. >> laura: what?di really?

if 2020 sweeps democrats into power, the government will be filled with angry msnbc hosts. thousands of political appointees to do to the american people what they are trying to do to president trump. since retaking the speaker's gavel, pelosi has shown us time and again that obama's promise ga hope and change is dead. >> impeachment that will last forever. >> moscow mitch says that he is the grim reaper. >> i think the president is a coward. i think he is cruel. so don't mess with me. >> laura: that never getsde old. they want revenge. and so, november, you don't vote for trump, who vote for one of these other people, it's just going to be payback for four years. if they impeach trump on these bogus grounds, do you think they

are going to become bill clinton's interests if they win the presidency? they are going to impeach the economy. impeachy the constitution. impeach our history. and bulldoze anyone, any group, any company that gets in their way. unless, that is, republicans stand united and make the case vigorously to the people. unless reasonable independents refuse to be bullied by the squad, the leftist hit squads roaming about this town and the country. unless you, the american people, deliver democrats a stinging rebuke in november.tr and that is the "angle." chris hahn reacts to my "angle," and was martha mcsally right about cnn's manu raju? we have the evidence. th voya gives us confidence. so we can spend a bit today, knowing we're prepared for tomorrow. wow, do you think you overdid it maybe? overdid what?

well planned, well invested, well protected. voya. be confident to and through retirement. force factor's alpha kingtime to boosts total testosteroner game. for more lean muscle in the gym, more energy, and more passion and drive so you can rule the bedroom. unleash your potential with alpha king. now available at gnc. we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping were cut in half. just like that. shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get 2 months free.

shipstation. the #1 choice of online sellers. beyond the routine checkups. beyond the not-so-routine cases. comcast business is helping doctors provide care in whole new ways. all working with a new generation of technologies powered by our gig-speed network. because beyond technology... there is human ingenuity. every day, comcast business is helping businesses go beyond the expected. to do the extraordinary. take your business beyond.

♪ >> laura: here to respond to my "angle," matt schlapp, chairman of the american conservative union, and chris hahn, host of the "aggressive progressive"e" podcast. it was hope and change under obama. pretty inspiring, but i didn't agree with lot of his policies. some of our media friends, irs, two-party groups, what do we have in store if the democrats do win? >> what i really see his retribution, and i see the g democrats being fully unhinged on their most radical policy views. we've seen it in the debates with the presidential candidates. reparations, health insurance for those who come here illegally. you know, the answer to every question of the debate the other day, the start of every answer was "the government needs to," and then you have all of these questions but what unites america. i think when it comes to these radical democrats, laura, i don't think the anymore agree

with things we used to believedi united us as a country. i don't think they like our founding, and i think a lot of them think that america is a blight on the globe, instead of an inspiration of the globe. >> laura: okay, chris is sigh, i didn't think that was loud enough, chris. >> that was an al gore sigh.y, >> laura: we will call these segments beyond the sighs. go ahead. >> matt, democrats love america the same as republicans love america. in the thought that you would say and question my love of this country, it's just ridiculous. you know that, and you know me. we know each other. i don't question yournd love. we have a different way of how we think the country should go, but that is where the mind has been crossed by the g.o.p. and by this president. i remember a lot of people being rightfully outraged when a democratic candidate called trump supporters a basket of deplorables. should we also be outraged when you say things like i don't

believe in the founding of this country? >> i didn't say that.n i would like to hit this back at you. you actually don't agree with the same vision of america that ii have. i'm not saying you don't loveac your country, chris, and this really isn't about you, believe it or not. the democrats running for president, they want -- as obama said -- they want to fundamentally transform this country into something that is different from the valleys of the founders. >> laura: doesn't even obama find some of these developments, chris -- because he said as much with some of the things happening on the fringes that seem to have infected even more moderate democrats..meng even he has kind of -- like, i would be too conservative for this new party.ve yeah, chris, you would be too conservative for some of the democrat party today, that do have outside influence. >> so, i think when we paint the entire party by its fringes, it's dangerous. i mean, it happens on the righth as well. there are some progressives that want to paint the entire republican party by its most extreme people, like this guy

hyde in connecticut and what he is doing. i wouldn't paint a republican with the same brush. i think there are people who want to see america do the right thing and do good, but unfortunately, we have a a president of united states whoca stands at rallies and says all democrats hate america. >> i'm just talking about democrats running -- >> the majority leader in the speaker of the house, islamic garb -- >> laura: just to remindy, everyone, getting back to obama, because i think it is important, he was a two-term democrat president, beloved, he said twor months ago that we have to be rooted in reality, reacting to what was being said at these debates. when he wasn't progressive enough. and whether it is warren or sanders, sometimes even joe biden sounds like he has been infected by this. you can sense obama is worried. >> yeah, i mean, come on, when

kamala harris stands on the stage and basically calls joe biden a racist?wo >> laura: gentlemen, we've got to go. was mcsally right about manu raju? i have evidence next.au ix

..

>> for months, adam schiff's hatchet man and the favorite reported the dems the president,

according to the federalist this came from leaks, fusion gps cofounder didn't take sources for dossier and trump, exclusive top aides, there's a lot more. more than a dozen that all went one way, against trump. that's all the time we have tonight, you be the judge of that one. shannon bream, take it from here. >> it is official, the senate is sworn in pledging to be impartial jurors and impeachment of donald trump. whether witnesses will be called, what republican stephen collins are saying about how he plans to vote. a bombshell report about the impeachment drama, comey reportedly investigated for use of leaks of classified information to the media.