>> breaking tonight, house manager only filed their impeachment brief with the senate. president trump sends an angry letter to the sender freak: the proceedings a dangerous attack on americans) welcome, thank you so much for being with us tonight. and thanks as always for delivering justice to the number one slot, all weekend long. we appreciate it. we will talk about the president's letter to the senate and much more tonight and congressman of the house republicans in the congressman mark meadows. him from the legal defense team,

and we will talk about the royal bombshell announced today. it is all on next. but first my (. >> our country is in the midst of a great economic awakening. to this train deals in one week. an awakening that everyone is able to participate in. yet the only thing that the democrats in congress can focus on is an unconstitutional factually insufficient, carson impeachment, and windows is not going to succeed. democrats know they're going to lose in the senate but rather than focusing on how to continue to grow the economy, in the country there only focuses on tearing down. is that what you want in your leader. and so bent on destroying and removing the president and all of the good he is doing for us, that they would do so based on irrelevant in material inman miscible evidence in second and

third hand hearsay. folks, they only thing the democrats care about is power. and they will do whatever they can to take down whomever they must within their way to obtain a power. earnestness is they rushed through impeachment and cause and then south and then they do nothing. and then they demand further investigation as they bring their noncriminal, nonstatutory, non- high-priced misdemeanor, none treason, none bribery sham articles of impeachment to the senate. to take look. it. >> the feeling in the senate chamber is solemn. it is serious and profound. the weight of history, the eyes of history, you can feel it, are upon us. every one of my colleagues public. i hope my colleagues on the other side of the aisle felted. >> really chuck, did you get a

thrill that you might become majority leader. here is how solemn nancy friend. >> these actions which undermine our national security, violated his oath of office to protect and defend the constitution, and jeopardize the integrity of our election. >> and there's the session with those two noncriminal, non- unconstitutional articles of impeachment, were carried from the house to the upper chambers of the senate. and the occasion was described as crossing the threshold in history. yet they cross the threshold all right, their hostility in was inapplicable as they cross the threshold from politics to the theater of the absurd. it will prove fatal to their cause in november. and get this, nancy pelosi says it is not a question about proof, it is question of

allegations. >> in any case, it is not a question of saying, proof, and says what allegations have been made. >> really. you bozos, up and everything that makes america great including the constitution. it is not about proof, it is about allegations. didn't you try that with can not. how did that work out for you. to them, whether it is true or not, it doesn't matter. depends on what they think is true. not whether they can substantiate it. whether they can substantiate it is irrelevant to them. and if they try to make it so solemn. history is watching us. as they proceed for one out to next, make no mistake, they were celebrating as nancy passed out silver platters with her name etched on gold pins to celebrate the occasion. it wasn't solemn. it wasn't serious.

they were giddy with joy. there are about as a serious as much of second graders passing gas in classrooms. and then, they had the unmitigated goal to try to tell the senate panoramic case that they totally had no proof. they could prove collision is only substituted ukraine as a new basis for impeachment. in the transcripts, is proof that there was no crime. they wondering mail even though he violated no law, and other what the senate to investigate and call the witnesses they didn't bother to call. this in his job is not to do the investigation of the house. the senate news job is not to build the case has credit. in the senate news job is not to reinvestigate the investigation. his job was to rule on it. and for all you bozos and out what to call left, the latest guy indicted on multiple

felonies it will do whatever he can to get out of this indictment, is no more credible than your hero, michael quinn. he got dragged out of prison to testify in your holiday chambers. how did that would work out for you. in the russia collusion delusion. in her other euro, he's got indictments pending against him from coast-to-coast. there is even talk about him running for president. are you stupid two. can someone tell me, what we have to suffer through this baseless nonsense, transcripts of the conversation between president trump and gillespie is best evidence braided turn on the audio and then turn it off. in thinking confirmation that the president release the money when required and send it to the senate jury to deliberate. serious stops the hogwash. americans wanted to see the truth and while were at it, would you please stop saying

joan hunter by the corruption quid pro quo is developed. he debunked it. and when. even in the new york times, the thesis got legs. look folks, in the end, we know how it ends. the indictment has been hand left. "the issue is" joy. the trial against donald j trump began strength but unfortunately, were going to have some muddling through of the democrats partisan charade of the united states, for no high crime, no statutory crime no constitutional crime, but some abuse of power, we will be subjected of that squalling, their unceasing objections and the nonstop partisanship. but i want you to remember is the hostility and the malevolence that brought us to the shameful point in american

history. they must pay a price for not doing their job for the american people. they must pay a price for trying to seize power to which they are not entitled. and that's my open. i know what you think of a facebook and twitter, hashtag judge jeanine. and here reaction to my open this ridiculous impeachment charade. joining me now. callahan, i want to talk some issues with you but i have to ask you about the president's letter to the senate tonight. the president responded they were going to ask another to the actual answer to the houses impeachment letter and brief. so with this letter and the president responded, from the white house. it makes it clear that there seems to be no crime and nothing they can actually even defend.

>> will the president news great legal team may to the point jeanine is constitutionally unsupported. let's go back just a few months. we were promised bribery quid pro quo, high crimes and misdemeanors and there is nothing here that even approaches that. in fact his words are not even in the actual articles of impeachment. you look at mrs. just a few articles of impeachment, initially you can write them your hand. a little index card. they're very thin. therefore all of the promises and all that they never sat there screaming their heads off about this. with the senate will have to focus on are these two articles of impeachment. and ask him up with very little. i have a slightly different view than others maybe i think them when people look back at the beginning of january and 2020 they're going to only think about the economic boom time. at least major trade deals in today's.

and then jones said it has gone past 29000 will keep on going. the fact that in 25 is the most percent, of our economic are enjoying the greatest ways. in the boom of the trump economy and people think about things in very large profits. people think about the impeachment. nancy pelosi said he will be impeached forever. he's going to have to answer for when they got so little done. usmc a training 796,000 auto jobs, and at the border he reported probably zero of that on the companies they will move their productions overseas and in tears and said . winter and 796,000 jobs created overall. in the china deal. the first time in history somebody has dispute resolution. i don't talk about china but when a backup for a second.

usmc a. that was held at my pelosi. for months and months and months how many people could event jobs during that time. and also now. stupid people should know that. judge jeannine: client. let's talk about now, china deal. i understand phase one requires china divide an additional $40 million in agricultural products from what they are buying already. they were talking about this because pelosi is going on with this nonsense is now in the senate. >> we are talking about it and i think history will not look kindly on the instigators in the investigators of this. and will reward those beginning with president trump. who actually showed courage and boldness in transforming our economy in a relationship with the world news second-largest becoming china. a quick review, we had actually in dollar trade deficit with china.

every year. the reversing technology instilling technology. in the total amount of goods and services that china will not bite under the agreement, is 200 billion. 40 billion is aquaculture. and this is fully enforceable and there's a 90 day. whether they're satisfied with the way things are doing and going. i think most importantly is the way to present trump approach this deal. in his team and secretary nugent, he didn't take deal when he could've. he could've taken the deal from america. the american worker and farmer and rancher manufacture, they're all going to benefit. and the china trade hill and a him ca. that from history will show the one on january 2020. about one euro away from this is next in operation, and he will go in couple of days and he will talk about this economic. judge jeanine: what is the president going to

switzerland on the very day that the impeachment trial begins in the senate. what message is the president sending with that. >> he goes to work everything that on behalf of the american people and the resultant deliberating crop progress reports on the first few years the presidencies tells the entire town. he really does matter what they're doing. they are wasting their time and your money taxpayers on this ridiculous trial to try to do something and we know the outcome is. he will not be removed from the office and he will be reelected to the office. it will continue. do you really do regulation two. deregulation energy, seven new regulations and one new regulation that where saving billions of dollars and they are invasive and expensive. they are real people and the people are free to choose what

they do. in the energy explosion is crazy. when out exporters of natural gas and oil. in a way they were not depending on these foreign entities. judge jeanine: what is amazing about it is the animal spirits that started almost as soon as the president took over and took office. >> doesn't really matter. it's frustrating and annoying. i'm not sure it matters because people feel it know it. thank you so much. judge jeanine: thanks so much. in the trial and senator randall has an interesting perspective on just how unnecessary this whole charade is. >> they basically are upset that president trump delayed delivering forney. well i'm under the opinion the parnate is unconstitutional. it is unwise to send the money over to ukraine or any other countryman have to borrow from china. judge jeanine: twenty me now to talk about that

more is one of the jurors now coming impeachment trial. mike brown. he was supposed to be alive from in south dakota tonight, they claimed to a blizzard which you can see on the screen his trip was canceled. and we appreciate him giving us a few minutes on the phone. good evening senator are you there. >> is ayanna thank you very much. interstates are now starting to open up again. judge jeanine: of course. we are looking to get you on justice another time but were thrilled to have you on. you are a juror in the upcoming historic senate impeachment trial is scheduled to begin in the senate on tuesday and on tuesday, the senators are scheduled to debate the resolution as it relates to the calling of witnesses and the producing of documents. now the democrats want witnesses and most of the republican senators do not. what you think is going to happen given that you need 51

votes to set the senate rules there are 53 republicans 47 democrats. how is always going to work out in terms of the witnesses. >> i think right now, our consensus is that the republicans will support senator mcconnell spent just to follow similar guidelines is what we saw in the clinton impeachment. and that means we will do phase one without making a decision as to any additional witnesses. basically what were saying here is okay house, you've artie had enough to impeach, bring it on. bring it over here. then we will find out at that point whether there is an additional findings of fact necessary. or if you have failed to make your point. now the facts are clear, and there is no for the reason for any witnesses or any additional material, we can at that time vote up or down to have a not have witnesses. once that is complete, if they

decide not to have any witnesses, and we can move on to other questions including whether or not we go to directly to a final decision up or down on removing him from the oval office. he went as a former d.a. myself, and i tried many cases myself. sometimes as a project, and the alleged certain facts in a crime in the indictment which on presentation of their evidence, is factually insufficient which is the president and stressing that was delivered tonight i believe five or 6:00 o'clock. there can be emotion to dismiss the indictment. is it possible in the senate for there to be a motion to dismiss before the president even comes in because it's factually insufficient. it. >> it possible but is highly unlikely here's the reason why. as of this bill very with president should be exonerated based upon the facts that have been presented so far. the best way to do that is to go

directly to another rambo is whether or not he should be removed. remember to be removed from office, it requires a two thirds vote. a substantially news phone number supporting that will send a very clear message to mass that they didn't do the job. and that there was no evidence. and remember and not at this point charge him with any crimes, no i crimes, and suggested this is a high crimes and misdemeanors. and while it is true that he can be we can be impeached without having a crime and it would be the first crime in the nation if that were to occur. but based on the evidence they have presented so far, we just simply don't see how the move forward and asking to try to find additional material for them. be one in 32nd senator that we have not, i think the most senators have already minute the

minds or more generic question, do you think senators to be biased. aren't you all, having watched his charade, don't you think a lot of people have made up their minds and senate. >> i think the founding fathers were clear that they expect us to be fair and impartial but that doesn't mean that we have been able to look at all of the material that is been provided by the house already. it doesn't mean that we can't speak her mind as to what we have seen so far. and the vast majority if not all republicans so far and perhaps some democrats have not seen how the house has been able to code up with enough material to suggest the removal of office. the house has the ability to impeachment the senate has to be the adults in the room. and were the ones that have the ultimate say on this. as you said earlier, i think the decisions for the most part, we all know the final outcome. but as the senate, we have to do

this correctly, we have to follow and do our due diligence and then we tell with the final outcome to be made very clear to the american public. judge jeanine: thanks so much for being with us. later on, will be talking with pam from the legal team of the presidents. i am asking republicans as we talk robinhood believes now is the time to do money. without the commission fees. so, you can start investing today wherever you are - even hanging with your dog. so, what are you waiting for? download now and get your first stock on us. robinhood. what happened to the real men of america? before we suffer a full-on masculinity crisis, unleash your potential test x180 ignite from force factor. boost testosterone to fuel desire and build lean muscle in the gym. plus burn fat and improve performance. now available at retailers nationwide.

beyond the routine checkups. beyond the not-so-routine cases. comcast business is helping doctors provide care in whole new ways. all working with a new generation of technologies powered by our gig-speed network. because beyond technology... there is human ingenuity. every day, comcast business is helping businesses go beyond the expected. to do the extraordinary. take your business beyond.

>> welcome back, when guests is arranged by the entire impeachment. jenny me now with more has republican. congressman thank you for being here. >> judge, great to be with you. judge jeanine: on the start with the ceremony. i felt it was fascinating as they marched solemnly through one house chamber to the upper chamber, with the articles of impeachment. he seemed so serious about it. when i got the sense that they were high-fiving each other after this whole thing was over. what can you tell us about that. >> how embarrassing was it to see pelosi said, i better hurry this thing credit whole western civilization is at stake we don't remove this president.

then she system the entire holidays in the papers try to play games and trying to act like she is the center. totally gives iceman so to speak for mitch mcconnell where ultimately he says your 11 irrelevant to this process. they have this juvenile ceremony where they are handing out expenses if it's some kind of trophy ceremony. the whole thing is been a sham. it is been a witchhunt. i think it shows. it is very personal. it's only about trying to hurt this president from winning again. because it did not happen with the 2016 election print the case. i was clear. every one of the star witnesses, can you name an impeachable thing. no . cement. judge jeanine: during this month of the house was off during which he of those articles of impeachment, all you would know. did you notice a reaction of people not just in your district, but work what were other congresspeople over the hearing from their constituents and they got home braided.

>> seated in the fully been, swing voters are furious with this near asking especially all of us impress them in two years ago, saying they were going to be different than work with everybody and boeing news policy and every one of them, they're being asked in their swing districts, when you been doing and why have you been focusing things like working with the other parties to build infrastructures and secure the border. none of those things are happening because of this obsession the polls he said impeachment. it actually costing that democrats people. they his reaction when he went back home, was incredibly positive. people thanking him for mark and basically working for them. in trying to work with this president to get some things done. judge jeanine: let's talk about those districts that were trump leaning districts. twenty-one. should the will be concerned about them and how do you think they're going to fair in the next election because in their

up in 2020 also. >> those the ones that close seatmate really walk the plank on. a lot of those democrats did not want to do the impeachment at all. that gives aoc news very tweet the weekend before policy came out to impeachment, where they incessant essence threatened the democrats the majority saying why are they impeaching the president. and lo and behold and in pelosi came out a few days later saying she's going to impeach the president. they haven't anything except harass and try to impeach the president. they're not going to remove him from the office ultimately the voters are going to decide who the president is. people are fed up with this personal politics attack so the policy is been using. judge jeanine: negative this. and is now in the upper chamber in the senate. there's gotta be a certain relief that you have in all of in-house for this waste of time

essentially. in his you say, trying to redo the 2016. the time for the scalp finger on 2020 election. do you have a chance to be able to start working on some things for the american people started to think policy is interested in that leading up to the election anyway. >> judge, i haven't seen holiness for her to move on actually focus on priorities. look over the break one of the things that she and a few of the other impeachment fanatic to say is that they're going to impeach the president again. thirty the party of impeachment. we have the package on the committee and it has to be unanimous. every democrat and republican to lower drug prices. if pelosi and put them on the floor, it would've passed overwhelmingly president trump would assign it. that's going on today because of the sin. pavement obsessiveness. i think you're seeing people back home being fed up with this

whole personal and petty obsession that they have against the president. judge jeanine: it will be interesting to see what happens in november. thank you so much for taking time out of your weekend. take care. and pam bonnie, from the president's legal team and congressman mark minutes, still ahead. the next, why would anybody want to leave the royal family. if you dream being a princess your whole life. were talking about it most of

the time in north america. now back to justice with judge jeanine. judge jeanine: here here, here he, came to an amicable conclusion today. it's very and may megan markle struck a deal to gracefully exit the royal family. her to discuss it is rain. spectator usa. thank you for being here. please explain why some americans don't get with the brits, also near endure to the heart and that is this monarchy and obsession with it. in winter, it really is a mono. weather power but in every sense of things.

>> is very to, the monarchy does not have much power. it's a simple. in many ways functions as perhaps one of the world news greatest and longest-running soap operas. because these characters we feel we know them. generally we never meet them but we feel there a big part of our lives. in this episode of the drama. his office twist coming. barely married couple of years and already the royal runaway thinking they can take the families somewhat with them. and instead, her majesty is set off of their hats, you're not leaving you all that. >> went what is interesting, what started out as the potentially this explosive drama filled event, a couple of weeks ago and now it seems to have quietly settled down. they pretty much made the decision as to what is going to happen and how this thing is going to play out. when did you tell the viewers what exactly will happen with megan and harry. >> moment has settled down so

quickly. her majesty the queen is only 93 years old. as soon as she was involved of course everybody had to jump in my but the deal that has been cut is a tough deal. megan and harry are not allowed to call themselves his royal highness or her royal highness. they're not receiving any money from the british taxpayers. they're having to pay back the $3m dollars that they spent other people news money of course they spent doing what they're cottage. and generally speaking, they're going to have to make a living on their own. and that is no easy thing for them to do. judge jeanine: where will they be living. is it canada la. new york, uk. >> i'm feeling for tax reasons, they don't want to be genocide for the nazis. the irs will be a lot of them of the royal family too. they were talking about canada. but a lot of canadians are not very impressed with them being treated as a halfway house. judge jeanine: that will they maintain the residence in london.

>> oh yes, they have a cottage providing than they can still make the rent on that. because now they have to. so imagine the looking down the back of the royal stuff as we speak. judge jeanine: how will the make money. >> lincoln due to various appearances in franchising things. they have a website. sussex royal. but sources in buckingham palace are saying the terms which they're allowed to use that's next rules have been flexed and there. so the before they can start printing out the megan and harry that thousand pieces may have to get permission from grandma. judge jeanine: let me ask you, this final question. the decision that they made to leave. was based on harry's experience in the impact of his mom and dad had a raise mother died in the tunnel. is megan enclosing him. do we do with the tipping point was pretty. >> i think the both of the reasons pray for her she had great trouble adjusting to this weird way of life in the royal family has prayed for him, he's on it all of the ball in front

of the cameras with what with the media. in the danger here is you're actually rushing that kind of tragedy himself. judge jeanine: it seems that based upon some of the rumors, she may be working for disney or something like that. w front of a lot more cameras anyway. thank you so much mystery for joining us tonight. judge jeanine: how the president defense began and pam money from the legal team joins us next.

judge jeanine:president trump he legal team and tonight fight back begins. joining me know is one member of that special advisor to the president and former florida attorney general, pam bondi. thank you pam so much for being here. i want to start before i get into the answer that was filed

today. this evening impact. the president in response to the impeachment statement of the house. you've got adam schiff, who now is one of the house managers they call them, they really he is a prosecutor. do they do that with a straight face. this guy every time he opens his mouth. un prosecutions in the state of florida. it is a native little bazaar for the sky, you should be to begin with, let alone he would recuse himself to be in charge of this. >> we very well may calling him as a witness if we ultimately kept witnesses. don't discount that yet. you know jeanine, remember what he does, he starts off in his opening argument lying about the phone call with president zielinski, he was really unreal. just flat-out lying about the transcripts about the phone calls. then what he would but as he do

then. he said he has no idea that was a lower is. then when we find out, his team has been basically coaching was a lower is not a real whistleblower by the way of course. the informant, then later. now this is the guy, is going to code over and for this and present the case to the united states and in print has saying that he has evidence on russia collision. he had the war evidence more did. i can't believe they made him the house manager. ended with a straight face. judge jeanine: but i went really want to talk about the sense of the president. i have read it all. i think that it is fascinating because it is very clear that it's not only the presence responses that and trying to change 2016, they are trying to impact the 2020. they don't have the right to do that but the one that i thought

was most interesting as a lawyer obviously, is that it is factually insufficient. these articles of impeachment, they don't establish a crime. so how can you actually impeach print on crime. or something that isn't a violation of the constitution. >> that's exactly right janine. they have had this reckless obsession with impeaching president trump from before he was even sworn into office. and it has continued on and on and now as i said earlier, when schiff said they have all of these crimes, absolutely nothing. they not charge the president with any crimes in the president did nothing wrong. there was no crime. the transcripts of that phone call speaks for itself. so yes insufficient, on the merit, and if there is sending this basic trash over to the u.s. senate. his last part of that and especially with adam schiff

presenting it. bringing on because were ready to go . >> following the disclosure of this phone call, the president was transparent in the allegation subtracting congress by asserting executive privilege, which is recognition of the separation of power is something that every president is entitled to do. so when i was just saying earlier in any real casework picture, you make it into motion a motion and then i understand thinking is that you really want to have been spurred. so that the president can be fully exonerated. >> you know in the beginning he kept saying he said the president wanted witnesses. if we were falsely accused, we would want witnesses to pray because now though it is become so flimsy there is absolutely nothing in the impeachment. it is an insult to the people in

the present. let's put this behind him and him continue to do the all the great things for our country that he is continuing to do. it is so great to watch him work nonstop. this just like them trying to derail pam and deter him. it's not going to work. he is a great president. he's going to keep fighting for the american people the next five years. judge jeanine: i am 22nd spent. we think going to happen in the senate. do you think that those senators are kind of on the edge there, whether it is romney and colli collins, do you think that they will have more witnesses 40 think i will die from is mitch mcconnell thinks it will predict. >> i think they're going to see especially after opening arguments and maybe before that, the seat truly the lack of evidence that is been brought to them. i think they're all going to do the right thing. i think there and i think they're ready to get back to

work. instead of sitting there every day listening to this trash. it. judge jeanine: pam bondi thank you so much for being with us on saturday. and congressman mark met us with

judge jeanine:

the impeachment trial begins in the senate. joining me now is congressman mark meadows. i want to start with nancy pelosi now admits she without the articles from going to the senate to force republicans to call witnesses and now the ball is in their part to do it or pay a price. anything about one predict. >> i think the narrative continues to change with nancy pelosi. maybe she was waiting for all those impeachment bends to arrive on special order. more importantly than that, she was serious about calling witnesses, and what in she said. the very witnesses that she is talking about bringing forth in the senate. she actually withdrew the subpoenas. she's not serious about the judgment but we do know is this going to go to the senate and it should be dismissed. one of the things we are hearing is this. we are hearing that josh la is making an announcement that he believes that there should be an amendment to dismiss.

the main way they make sure that this does not become a surrogate, is to have that not only at the beginning of this trial, but throughout the process because i think our senators are going fine and there's not a case here. >> said that earlier, there's a line back of house managers. as you said, you tweeted something about the underlying crimes. there is no underlying crimes. >> is the first time that there's not an underlying crime. and actually some of my colleagues actually pointed that out and we were having some discussions. the simple where is the underlying crime. it is just not there but more importantly than that adam schiff continues to tell one falsehood after another and trying to spend an narrative that was a justice president did something inappropriate. i've seen evidence and a bit of the deposition spread and i can tell you that the senators will reach the same conclusion that

we rage, just on the case here . judge jeanine: there's not only an underlying crime is defined in a first-hand witness that could say anything that contradicts or transports anything with a phone call at all. >> will we have five witnesses that says that the president did nothing wrong. we said that to our house collins brought forth. we had president zelinski, we had to underneath him. how many more witnesses to we have to have the, this is the president did not pressure him before nancy pelosi and her team will agree. there will never be enough witnesses that would exonerate the president for satisfaction. so i can tell you this is a sad day for america but you will be a good day soon. because it is interesting, we had two different signing ceremonies. i 1600 pennsylvania avenue where we had sent historic chinese trade deal. in the other one was the impeachment articles and the

american people would prefer the 1600 pennsylvania avenue. judge jeanine: jobs and the economy. always good to see you. thanks so much for being with us.

are you sick and tired of looking and feeling heavy? probioslim promotes healthy digestion and helps you lose weight. patented probiotics ease constipation, gas, and bloating, while powerful egcg burns fat and calories. unleash your potential with probioslim. available at retailers nationwide.

♪ ♪ >> a big day ahead monday for the fox news channel. starting on monday, ed henry will be joining sandra smith as co-anchor of america's newsroom from 9 p.m. to 12 p.m. eastern. and bill hemmer will be taking over our 3 p.m. eastern time slot with the debut of bill hemmer reports. both shows kick off monday. that's it for us tonight. thanks so much for watching. i'm jeanine pirro, advocating for truth, justice and the american way. the greg gutfeld show coming up, and i'll see you next saturday night. i'll be in washington. have a good weekend.

♪ ♪ >> u.s. representatives for 12. >> 150 third of this house delegation is this committee chairman. his name is adam sure. [laughter] greg: no, his name's tom shillue! [cheers and applause] greg: so i think we found the one thing worse than fake outrage, fake righteousness. >> we are here today to cross a very important threshold in american history. >> we are on the precipice of a great historic moment dealing with protecting the constitution. >>