ukraine were all about getting dirt on joe biden and hunter biden and trying to get the country president to go along. so far, very few minds seem to be changed. but they continue. as do we. here comes "the five." >> hello, everyone, i am jesse watters along with katie babbage, juan williams, and greg gutfeld >> it is 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five." it is day three of the impeachment trial. you are looking live at the senate floor warehouse impeachment managers are desperately trying to convince the senate to throw trump out of office but so far adam schiff and his friends have not been able to move the needle. the republicans aren't buying the democrats' case. take a look. >> mr. schiff and the other managers did an exceptional job

laying out the facts. speak of this is the weakest case for impeachment and history of the country. we continue to see how flimsy this case is. >> the president's action is wrong, it is illegal, it is dangerous. speaker who shouldn't be trusted? it is adam schiff trying to perpetrate this lie on the american people. >> jesse: while the democrats will spend 24 hours going after trump, adam schiff reveals what impeachment is really about. >> we are here today to consider a much more grave matter and that is an attempt to use the powers of the presidency to cheat in an election for precisely this reason. the president's misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly w won. >> jesse: i was reading karl rove today. >> dana: great way to start your day. >> jesse: and he had a great

point. i've made this point many times but i guess he made it in "the wall street journal," so come a very, very official. we were just talking about it. what if hillary clinton had become president and then we had found out she'd paid for this dossier overseas to dirty up her political opponent? with the democrats have wanted to impeach her for paying for foreign election interference? >> dana: surely not. >> greg: i rest my case! >> dana: we can go back to regularly scheduled programs. and in "the wall street journal" today, he can zero in on politics like this and make the point, but basically it would've come out because the whole issue of carter page and all this fisa stuff, it was going to come out either way, and yes, we've established hypocrisy is well at hand. people who had one position in 1999 have a different position now and if the shoes were on the other feet we know what would happen. i do want to mention one thing, adam schiff and his cohorts there have continued to use this

phrase that the president was trying to cheat in an election. republicans, when they had a chance repeated several times that the democrats are trying to steal an election. i'm just wondering, if you are at home, cheating and stealing an election, it gets to be a little bit confusing and i think the numbers show that. the ratings are not great for all of this. people are sort of paying attention, not much. they are pretty tribal on them. they for this for a long time. a house democrat said they think adam schiff did a great job but they know this is going nowhere and they would like to get back to business. >> jesse: you know what i was thinking about, if biden had not bragged on camera that he fired the prosecutor investigating his son, i don't think president trump ever would've even known to ask ukrainians to look into the corruption. >> juan: what difference does that make? >> jesse: biden is responsible for it. >> juan: trump is always going to be looking for something and this is the heart of the matter

that you heard presented by adam schiff yesterday, you can't just say this is about something that happened in the past. the president is persistently saying it is a perfect call. there is nothing wrong, he told interviews, with seeking a foreign country to intervene in our elections to his benefit. that is what he's saying. what you heard from adam schiff yesterday was literally saying, we have to be aware this is an ongoing issue. but i think the big story, to my mind -- by the way, i think the ratings numbers have been surprisingly good for something that is taking place largely in the middle of the day. people are paying attention. maybe it's not a sensation. it's not pro wrestling, but for something as serious and as requiring of attention as this, i think it's pretty good beer but i think the big news here is republicans say, why do we need witnesses if democrats say they made a compelling case with their two articles of impeachment? and what we have seen from schiff yesterday, which even

republicans like lindsey graham said was a very good job, and now today from jerry nadler and sylvia garcia, are just compelling narratives about why this president in fact, on the basis of facts and evidence, deserves to be impeached. >> katie: the word fact i think is an interesting one and all of that. all of those on the democrats i'd have had the luxury this week to talk for hours on end without being contested by anyone, without being questioned like we see in regular senate hearings. they can really say whatever they want and call it facts when there is a rebuttal coming that we are waiting for from the white house but on the hunter biden narrative, the argument has been made that president trump is simply going after hunter biden or joe biden because they want to score political points or gain some kind of advantage in the election. the white house has repeatedly argued it is about corruption and the argument has been it's only president trump. the obama white house also had very serious question about

hunter biden's position on marie's mom while hunter biden was working n policy. state department officials testified, that record has been entered into the senate for everyone to say, they have repeatedly said that bre' buriss a problem and a conflict of interest. >> jesse: not greg gutfeld money but money nonetheless. >> greg: you started this segment by saying you are looking live at the senate floor. now, you are looking dead. did you notice they were already showing videos that they showed yesterday? they are already into their summer reruns. but it doesn't matter because all they are trying to do is fill space. this is basically so far a three day campaign ad against trump. this would be a great time for the news to actually do the

fact-checking and say, the reason why people say adam schiff socks and adam schiff did a great job is because adam schiff is presenting opinion. people can disagree with the opinion, they say he is bad and people who agree with the opinion say he is dazzling. we know it's all opinion. the problem is we have all these fact-checkers and amazing journalists and they are just overloaded with adam schiff that they can't fact-check what he is doing. instead, what did they do? they discuss his performance. not the content, but the performance. oh, he really laid it out there. can you tell me what he laid out and whether or not it was true or false? most telling moment was that sound on tape that you played when schiff said impeachment is necessary because we can't count on 2020 being a legitimate election. think about that. he's saying that impeachment is a process is superior to an election.

not just past ones in 2016 about future ones. what he is basically saying is that anybody can do this. he is saying this to prevent a future event. this is a figment in his brain. it's not even real. he is saying the 2020 election cannot be trusted. the 2020 election has not even happened yet so we have seen this before with the media and the democrats. their arguments are always about the future because reality is so different than what they are experienced. the reality in the united states is great. the economy, the stock market. we have peace and prosperity. so they have to look ahead and predict the apocalypse in order to somehow keep trump in their cross hairs. but it's not about -- they know it is going to be acquitted. they know he is not going to be impeached so we all know it's not about impeachment. it's about wounding. this thing is actually effective because it's wounding him so that it will be a burden for him come election. they already know they are not

going to impeach the guy but they do know that this is something that will be stuck on him until the election. >> juan: allow me to quickly respond and say that i think fact-checkers are locked in, and what we are seeing is that the biggest fact-checkers are at the white house and they are in front of the microphone and they are republicans who say this is the problem or this is the problem. but they are not saying, hey, schiff is factually wrong. they are saying we don't like the process, the secret proceedings in the house -- >> jesse: they did say it was factually wrong. >> juan: now, nobody is arguing about the facts. by the way, something happened in 2016. and today, there was a presentation saying russia worked with donald trump in 2016 to benefit donald trump and donald trump asked for their help. >> jesse: trump she did in 2016, he's going to cheat again in 2020. >> juan: that is the worry.

he's getting help from ukrainians -- >> greg: help in office. >> jesse: at least he didn't pay for it like kirk and hillary. coming up, it's a question we have been asking a lot. where is hunter? we found out and you won't believe it next. s why i like liberty mutual. they get that no two people are alike and customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. almost done. what do you think? i don't see it. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ most people think as a reliable phone company. but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. (second man) virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences. (second woman) we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g.

almost all of the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation... verizon keeps business ready. thouwhich is breast cancer metastthat has spreadcer, to other parts of the body, are living in the moment and taking ibrance. ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor is for postmenopausal women or for men with hr+/her2- metastatic breast cancer, as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole significantly delayed disease progression versus letrozole, and shrank tumors in over half of patients. patients taking ibrance can develop low white blood cell counts which may cause serious infections that can lead to death. ibrance may cause severe inflammation of the lungs that can lead to death. tell your doctor right away if you have new or worsening symptoms, including trouble breathing, shortness of breath, cough, or chest pain. before taking ibrance,

tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include low red blood cell and low platelet counts, infections, tiredness, nausea, sore mouth, abnormalities in liver blood tests, diarrhea, hair thinning or loss, vomiting, rash, and loss of appetite. be in your moment. ask your doctor about ibrance. ♪

♪ >> juan: on the senate floor right now, house managers making their case that abuse of power is an impeachable offense. this counts as democrats continue to ramp up the pressure on getting more witnesses to testify. senator chuck schumer, the democratic leader in the senate, is being accused of sending mixed signals on that. take a look. speak out that's off the table and it's still apparent to the american public what an unfair trial this is. how they are so afraid of the

evidence. it will make the value of an acquittal zero. so either way, there is a good outcome. >> juan: will impeachment make trump a stronger opponent? joe biden seems to think so. >> i would ask the question, isn't the president going to be stronger and harder to beat if he survives this? the answer is yes, probably, b but, but congress has no choice. they have a constitutional responsibility. >> juan: i think the question is, as the democrats are trying to pose it, if the president is acquitted as most people think is likely, is it the case that the voting public might say, it wasn't a fair trial, we don't know. therefore the value of the acquittal is depleted. >> dana: i think the democrats are counting on that and you can bet that what they are really hoping for are some sound bites where they can say, cory gardner, colorado voted

against a fair trial, no witnesses. he should be voted out of office. i can even just imagine this is going to go both ways. that republicans will do the same. i just think the democrats are already sending mixed signals. we want these witnesses, not these witnesses. i predict there will be no witnesses. i think the republicans, they will say i think we've heard enough here, you don't want to give us these witnesses. you are not interested in a fair trial, either. we are going to vote, we are going to be done here. >> juan: chris wallace was making the point earlier today on fox news that republicans have the majority. if they decide they want witnesses and they wanted hunter biden or everybody else they could vote to bring them in. >> jesse: they could and we know where to find him, a $3.5 million home in the hollywood hills. knock on the door and we will find hunter biden where he is

paying child support to a woman he met at a strip club where he also allegedly smoked crack at. i listened to a lot of the testimony today and i think i understand what they think donald trump did wrong. so donald trump comes in and asks the ukrainians to investigate hunter biden, his corrupt company and the role his father played in getting his prosecutor fired. trump, you say, should've just handed over the millions of dollars without doing any due diligence, without ever establishing any trust with ukraine peer that is what you believe, hand over the money, don't ask any questions. it could've been bad press for joe biden if this had happened with the investigation, and a sense he is running for president, this is foreign interference in a campaign. do we have that right? >> juan: not quite but i won't interrupt. >> jesse: okay, to your logic, hunter biden could've sat on boards of corrupt companies and corrupt countries all over the

world and protected them from political prosecution and curried favor with the u.s. taxpayer for eight years while his father was being paid and donald trump can come in and he can't ask a damn thing about this guy's son being in all these corrupt countries. that is your logic? so is it the crime he tied the aid to the investigation? because the democrats have put zero evidence and had zero witnesses testified that aid was linked to the investigation, or was it asking a foreigner to investigate an american? because if that's the crime then that is what hillary did except she did more than ask, she paid for it. >> juan: that is so convoluted. >> jesse: i thought that was so clear. crystal clear. >> juan: you missed sylvia garcia. it was really terrific, in which she laid just this out for you, jesse, and made it very

apparent. i wish you had watched. because she talked about this and talked about how president trump didn't raise this issue in 2017 or 2018. >> jesse: she only found out about it because joe bragged about it on tv -- >> juan: hold on, you said they didn't do due diligence but yes, the u.s. government was interested in ukrainian corruption all along, but in the phone call, trump never mentions corruption. he mentions bidens. >> jesse: why do you think bidenbidens? because of corruption. because of burisma, the most corrupt company in the nation. >> juan: in the phone call, fox news poll's shows biden consistently beating trump, so trump says, i've got to get this guy. >> katie: two months before the july 25th phone call came out, a big story came out about joe biden being tied to burisma, whether he would be a problem to joe biden's campaign based on

his long history of dealing with these situations where he didn't have a lot of experience, getting paid a lot of money, on the phone call, he was asking about a government issued joe biden was dealing with while his son was on the board and burisma. that is the issue. i want to get back to this issue of witnesses. chuck schumer and the democrats have no leg to stand on when it comes to the spirit in america, the way due process works, the burden of witnesses -- not the burden, but the side of witnesses falls on the defendant. the defendant is the one who gets to decide on witnesses. not the prosecutors. now at this point democrats have a long history of throwing due process out the window, whether it's brett kavanaugh, president trump on impeachment. they have a guilty, prove it now before innocence attitude. they keep saying this is an unfair trial to the democrats. it's not about the democrats, about the person who is on

trial. in america, the fairness factor falls heavily on the side of the person being accused and in this case, that is the president. >> juan: greg, much of what we are discussing here with witnesses and burisma and all of this stuff has to do with the whole notion of a fair trial. >> greg: exactly. >> juan: i wonder what you think. >> greg: this is a waste of oxygen peer the prosecution does not control the defense. there need not be any discussion about this whatsoever. all they can say is have the people say, is this an impeachable offense, they can call witnesses, but the fact is and this is where my legal expertise comes in, any time you're going to take the prosecutors' advice or suggestion, that makes them happy, and that is a bad sign. you want the prosecution to be upset with you. do you want to put a fiery, aggressive defender, you want everybody to hate your lawyer because that means your lawyer is doing a great job. actually having this conversation is hysterical to

me. no, end of discussion. no witnesses, have a great day. >> juan: democrats or even siding jonathan turley, one of the defending lawyers insane, you don't have to have a specific crime to be guilty of abuse of power. >> greg: when you make a list of offenses, it is impossible to vote on them because there are supposed to be a specific thing you did wrong but not everybody can agree to the laundry list that they are doing. they have this, this, this. and they're all opinions. 10 times 0 is still 0. all these are opinions, so how can you vote on that? you can't even vote on this cr crap. >> juan: they think it is fact, i understand your position. coming up, "the five" takes on some of the media coverage of impeachment. so much fun, right ahead on

"the five." cologuard: colon cancer screening for people 45 plus at average risk. some things are harder than you thought. and others are easier. like screening for colon cancer with me, cologuard. i'm noninvasive and you use me at home. i'm also effective. i find 92% of colon cancers using dna in your stool. so why wait? cologuard is not for those at high risk for colon cancer. false positive and negative results may occur. ask your healthcare provider if cologuard is right for you. most insured patients pay $0.

it's either the assucertification process. or it isn't. it's either testing an array of advanced safety systems. or it isn't. it's either the peace of mind of a standard unlimited mileage warranty. or it isn't. for those who never settle, it's either mercedes-benz certified pre-owned. or it isn't. the mercedes-benz certified pre-owned sales event. now through march 2nd.

only at your authorized mercedes-benz dealer. ♪ i don't keep track of regrets. and i don't add up the years. but what i do count on is boost high protein. and now, introducing new boost mobility with collagen for joint health. when taken daily, its key nutrients help support joints, muscles, and strong bones. new, boost mobility.

art bed. can it help keep me asleep? absolutely, it senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it's the final days to save $1,000 on the sleep number 360 special edition smart bed. plus, 0% interest for 36-months. ends saturday. uh, "fifteen minutes could save you 15%ain? or more on car insurance." i think we're gonna swap over to "over seventy-five years of savings and service." what, we're just gonna swap over? yep. pump the breaks on this, swap it over to that. pump the breaks, and, uh, swap over? that's right. instead of all this that i've already-? yeah. what are we gonna do with these? keep it at your desk, and save it for next time.

geico. over 75 years of savings and service. ♪ >> greg: while cnn makes google eyes at adam schiff, one of their analysts and former clinton lackey made up a conversation with republicans. he tweeted "overheard conversation between two republican senators who only watch fox news. is this stuff real? i haven't heard any of this before. i thought it was all about a server. if half the stuff schiff is saying is true, we are up [bleep]'s creek. hope the white house has exculpatory evidence." after the tweet made much praise, including from "the washington post," he later added, "okay, maybe i made up

the conversation but you know that is exactly what they are thinking. what does this matter? he just revealed the entire anti-trump platform with "you know exactly what they are thinking. the last few years of panic have been from the media believing they can mind read. they accused everyone of racism and openly demonize trump supporters because they know what is in everyone's head. yet they are always wrong about reality. maybe it is their ill-advised mind reading that leads to these predicted catastrophes that never, ever come and that makes them even more sad and more nervous. of course, lockhart lie got thousands of retweets, which is fine with him here the lie is what he believes. cnn, will they admonish him? not when they are busy with their own faculty nations. you may remember joe lockhart, the presr

bill clinton during his infamous sex scandal. you were just a tot. but his whole strategy is saying, i know what everyone is thinking is thinking. >> dana: and this is the trial, everyone is pointing out your thoughts and opinions don't work. evidence is what is presented at a trial. and it is tempting and kind of fun to make up a conversation to put up 2 on twitter. my friend did something about what trump said. it seemed like something trump would say but he didn't say and it caused a whole firestorm. adam schiff made up a whole phone conversation and has paid the price ever since. we keep making these comparisons come of this impeachment versus clintons. i do wonder what it would've been like if someone like joe lockhart, the press secretary then, had had the tools of social media to be able to directly community it with the american people rather than through the media. >> greg: given that is the

topic of clinton's impeachment was about sex, can you imagine? the gifs. gifs or gifs? anyway. >> jesse: i know what some of the republicans are thinking. i'm starving and i can't wait to get on to be 20 "hannity" tonight. and the democrats are thinking, i'm starving and i can't wait to get to iowa. they'll have better places to be. adam schiff is like a human sleeping pill. everybody knows it but the media will tell you the guy is like a can of red bull. and you're wrong about the ratings. they have been down since day one, they are down from the house hearings and they are way down since the mueller hearing. i didn't think the people are really paying attention. joe lockhart, we've now come from reporting gossip to just making up gossip and reporting it. that is how bad it is. >> greg: should cnn fire joe

lockhart? >> juan: that is a good question. i don't think so, though. >> greg: i don't know, just a question. >> juan: he is not there is a straight news guy but i will say his description as satire is weak and wrong and he should have just said he was wrong and i think cnn should have said it wrong but i noticed, in the way that democrats go after senators who are republican senators who are sleeping, nodding off or whatever, now everybody is picking on -- this is like, distraction, distraction, distraction. i noticed that the rnc and the trump rapid response team made a big deal about what joe lockhart did. again, they don't want to deal with the facts of what schiff is presenting, what sylvia -- >> greg: mind-reading! >> juan: now, let's have a conversation about gossip. >> jesse: how does juan get all the republican talking points and i don't get any. send me some emails.

>> greg: should we just get your -- i would like to run some tape. this is the media completing about sleepy senators. >> some senators may be even leaving before tonight was done. it's odd and not something i expected. >> it's a terrible look to the public. these are people who are supposed to be listening to a hearing and making a decision on what is being presented. >> you find it too annoying or frustrating or uncomfortable to sit for hours. listen, you can resign tomorrow and go get another job. >> many of the senators of both parties were not at their desks at different times despite the rules but it's not like the future of the republican state. oh wait, it is! see, we turned it around? it's brilliant. >> juan: i think dianne feinstein is going to have to resign because she left at 9:30 p.m. last night and it went on and maybe they had something besides

water or milk to drink they wouo stay up. but again, it shows the house didn't have enough evidence to compresent the case. to the senators not listening to everything they are presenting shows the house is not giving them a compelling reason to sit and listen to every single detail because they think this is a very serious matter. i think it's interesting now that the media is concerned that politicians aren't doing the same work that regular people do, having to stay until the end of their jobs instead of leaving early. >> greg: and going away for weeks and weeks of vacation. >> dana: order campaign. >> greg: coming up, joe biden, his latest comment on illegal immigration. see next. see how to forecast anything,

from today's weather to tomorrow's business trends. with esri location technology, you can see what others can't. ♪

wean air force veteran made of doing what's right,. not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa ♪ >> dana: welcome back. how's impeachment managers are presenting their case on

impeachment. we will bring you any big developments. in the meantime, joe biden is getting some attention with these recent comments on illegal immigration. >> they go off to school wondering if mom comes to pick them up, is she not going to be there because an ice age and was to arrest her. you are fired, if, in fact, you do that. you only arrest for the purpose of dealing with a felony if you are committed and i don't count trump driving as a felony. >> dana: i saw this and i wrote you an email with an expletive. >> greg: you used to be so law and order into considering he is now the middle lane for the party, shows you how far left the party has become. daniel ortega would be considered a right wing crank among these guys. here's my suggestion to the democrats come i think they are squandering an amazing opportunity for rediscovering what america is. trump was not considered the conservative choice.

he was all over the map. he was antiwar so it pinched off the neocons. pro tariff, but on a couple issues he resonated, he could speak to the americans, the average joe and he was "law & order." he was an outside the box choice be the problem is they are all pandering to the left. trump didn't pander to the right, he just said what they wanted. if they had somebody, like, that surprise do. what he's doing, forfeiting every believe he had for the last few years in such a frail, sad manner you feel bad for him. >> juan: what is so radical about what he just said? in most of america, the first offense for drunk driving is a misdemeanor. it's not like in some states, it's just most of america. unless you injure somebody, kill somebody. >> greg: what is interesting to me as he is pro-drunk driving for illegal aliens. that is what i get out of it.

i'm just wondering, if you were talking about citizens, he probably wouldn't have gone that far. >> katie: there's a lot of angel parents and a lot of angel moms and families who are watching right now and seeing joe biden say that and their grief over family members who have been killed by drunk drivers here illegally, deported multiple times. a police officer in arizona in 2014 was killed by a drunk driver who was in the u.s. illegally. there are real-life consequences for americans as a result of joe biden saying that drunk driving, no big deal, especially for illegal aliens, who he is trying to pander to for some reason. that is exactly what he said. >> juan: he said -- >> dana: for everybody paid the penalty of a felony is a deterrent so you don't drive drunk because you will get punished. but that's not even for illegal immigrants. i don't want people thinking it is okay, like it's like getting

a parking ticket if you're driving drunk. >> jesse: it gives you the perfect opportunity to deport the illegal alien. have them fingerprinted, they are in custody, you get them out. those of the people you want out. you're not knocking on peoples doors who are trying to make a living, doing whatever they're doing, whatever job they have in this country, but you want to get the people out first that have committed crimes. drunk driving, pretty serious. if you are swerving all over the road, if you're putting people's lives in danger, that is just no good. he wouldn't go to another country and do that and expect to have everything be okay. oh, you can stay. before the threshold for deportation is higher if it is a felony because they have to prioritize the predation. drunk driving come if it is lower on the scale in terms of crimes they are going to not support as many drunk drivers as they would deport felons. >> dana: i could just imagine that campaign ad. if trump takes that language, what do you think?

>> greg: i don't know. the weird irony is, i would assume illegal aliens probably have a lower incidence of drunk driving because of this argument. >> juan: again, everyone is against drunk driving. i don't want a drunk driver, if he is an illegal immigrant, a legal immigrant. you just have to say it's wrong. but what this is about, it strikes me as, again, demonize immigrants and -- >> greg: he said it. to be when you said it. >> juan: but it's his response i'm talking about, not joe biden. >> dana: i want everyone to have a penalty of a felony if you are drunk driving, that is what i want. >> jesse: call and huber. up next, president trump takes on climate change activists. you will want to see that next. ,

i wouldn't be here if i thought reverse mortgages took advantage of any american senior, or worse, that it was some way to take your home. learn how homeowners are strategically using a reverse mortgage loan to cover expenses, pay for healthcare, preserve your portfolio and so much more. a reverse mortgage loan isn't some kind of trick to take your home. it's a loan, like any other. big difference is how you pay it back. find out how reverse mortgages really work with aag's free, no-obligation reverse mortgage guide. with a reverse mortgage, you can pay whatever you can, when it works for you, or, you can wait, and pay it off in one lump sum when you leave your home. discover the option that's best for you.

call today and find out more. i'm proud to be a part of aag, i trust em, i think you can too. ♪ >> katie: president trump heading back hard against the left climate change hysteria. how many have predicted the world is going to end in ten to 12 years? >> fear and doubt is not a good thought process because this is a time for tremendous hope and joy and optimism and action. we must reject the perennial prophets of doom and their

predictions of the apocalypse. they are the heirs of yesterday's foolish fortune-tellers. they predicted an overpopulation crisis in the 1960s, mass starvation in the '70s, and an end of oil in the 1990s. >> katie: while we are on the subject of left-wing prophets of doom come here is vice president al gore making an outrageous comparison. >> the burden to act on the shoulders of the generation of people alive today is a challenge to our today. this is dunkirk, this is 9/11. we have to rise to this occasion. he >> katie: it is not 9/11, first of all. aren't we tired like people like al gore who owned multiple homes, who take a lot of energy, putting the burden of the climate on those below them? >> jesse: doesn't his mansion in tennessee burn 500,000 times

more energy than the average american? must be nice but most people can't afford that type of ener energy. >> greg: i don't know if it is that number. >> jesse: extrapolated. i will tell you another number, i was researching this today. >> greg: oh, boy. >> jesse: want to see another pie chart? imagine the pyrite here 70% of u.s. energy consumption is oil and gas. 20% is coal and nuclear and only 10% is wind and wood and solar. it's nothing. and what they want to do is take the 90% that works, that's lifted all of these billions of people out of poverty, raises everyone's standards of living, air conditioners, tessler's, whatever we can have, air travel and they just want to take that down and make everybody just go fly around on wind. how exactly does that take you

across country? how is solar going to take you across the country to visit their grandparents? i want people to visit their grandparents with petroleum, with jet fuel not with burning stoves. it doesn't work. what is it like to be so wrong on everything? b3 i feel tickle in my ear from that blowing. >> greg: go to hr. >> juan: i know trump will say anything, i knew that part but the reality is i believe the administration is rolling back environment of regulations, rolling back our agreement to take part in the paris climate accord, right? i think this is the guy that has conservative stakes not mentioning the effects of climate change if they petition for money to deal with the effects of climate change on their coasts and increase the numbers appear to me this is like, oh, yeah, watch this hand, don't see what this hand is doing. it's trickery. >> dana: i remember during

2004, president bush's reelection campaign, al gore day being this big climate think i'm a january 24th, 2004, and it was the coldest day in north american history and the guy doesn't have great timing. i think the president is just providing some real talk here. i'm for conservation. i would love innovation. but if i say i think we should consider small nuclear in order to help power and get it to 50%, i'm shut down. no, we have to go completely off of all fossil fuels and guess who just did that was mark's brain has a very new left-wing government. a very high unemployment rate. they just announced by 2040 they are going to be all wind. how do you think that is going to go customer for jobs and also their own well-being and national security? not good. >> katie: i heard prophets of doom was a band for the '80s. >> greg: i opened for them. what were we told where the effects of climate change?

the first big claim was it would knock a percent to 10% of our gdp over the next 100 years. if the economy grows by 2% to three t3%, i can live with that. but we missed the big news here. trump was entirely correct in everything he said, taking down the prophets of doom, but he actually tied climate action to ending the panic. he moved away from his simplistic hopes. he said it was a hoax, which was his opening bid in the climate debate. he comes out very strong, then he moves as you moved towards him and always talking about this deal of planting a trillion trees. he is actually, if he believed it was a hoax he wouldn't be doing that. what you are seeing is a change in him and you are also, i think you will be seeing a change in the larger greater environmental movement because you saw it and some of the democratic candidates about being more rational about climate change

claims, talking about nuclear, other types of energy, clean energy like smaller plants, and moving away from the hysteria. i think we realized the hysteria doesn't work. even when it comes from a child it doesn't work. >> dana: greta doesn't complain about the autocrats. they are the worst. we are actually trying to do something. >> greg: don't say anything bad about greta or i will get on you on twitter! >> dana: "one more thing" up next. ♪ limu emu & doug [ siren ] give me your hand! i can save you... lots of money with liberty mutual! we customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

a more secure diaper closure. there were babies involved... and they weren't saying much. that's what we do at 3m, we listen to people, even those who don't have a voice. we are people helping people. and you may remember us from your very first sandwich,esh, your move-in-day feast, your bold canine caper, your dinner in the dark, your mammoth masterpiece, (whispering) your 3:47am snack, and whatever happened here. oscar mayer is found in more fridges than anyone else, because it's the taste you count on. make every sandwich count.

$12.99 all you can eat ♪ now with boneless wings. only at applebee's. sini wasn't sure...clot was another around the corner? or could things go a different way? i wanted to help protect myself. my doctor recommended eliquis. eliquis is proven to treat and help prevent another dvt or pe blood clot. almost 98 percent of patients on eliquis didn't experience another, and eliquis has significantly less major bleeding than the standard treatment. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. don't stop eliquis unless your doctor tells you to. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding.

don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. if you had a spinal injection while on eliquis call your doctor right away if you have tingling, numbness, or muscle weakness. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. what's around the corner could be worth waiting for. ask your doctor about eliquis.

zion williams had made his nba debut last night on espn. he had a game, started off a little slow. second half, he scored 17 straight points. finish the game with 22. came up a little short against the spurs but played

what did i say? people care more about this than the car about impeachment. ratings are income of 2.3 million watched this game and that outscored cnn big time. >> greg: didn't outscore the five. >> jesse: that's true. you are a bigger star than zion. >> katie: he jumped in to help a group of children across the street. they have an adult that's helping them cross the street, but he got ferocious with the car and made sure that these children would cross. he's a stray dog and he just help them. one of the hurting >> greg: how do you know was helping? >> juan: greg? >> greg: i can read his mind. ♪ animals are great

mobile animals are great ♪ i'm doing these particular videos over some media blogger can say other networks were carrying impeachment live... "the five" was showing a show how much joy this is getting. >> dana: i love the doorstop. >> greg: i wonder how many are made. we should do an hour-long special tomorrow at 5:00 on doorstops. >> jesse: the hunter biden sits on the doorstep of a big company. >> juan: i don't have to make the case anymore. if you remember my recent trip to serendipity with dana and emily, who

imagine my delight when i saw a fellow ice cream fanatic expressing her love? take a look. that's a 9-month-old getting her first taste of ice cream. the best part? her viral video, 100,000 on twitter. one comment, the babies put a sleeper hold all that ice cream. we have cookie monster, that we should have blakely monster. >> emily: very cute. this police reported >> dana: as a team until they would make first place. a bunch of their teammates won one of them in pencil shooting,

the community-based program like the boy scouts that gave law enforcement is to give the abilities so as teenagers. >> jesse: vertical assault. sound like something that you do, greg. "special report" is next. >> bret: thanks, jesse. welcome to washington. i'm bret baier. house impeachment managers say president trump should be removed from office now, right now, making their case at this hour to senator tonight withholding military aid to ukraine in order to get an investigation of his main political opponent and the president obstructed congress' investigation in the abuse of power. we are on the second day of the prosecution's three-day prosecution. there you see hakeem jeffries on the senate floor. it would be followed by 24 hours of defense rebuttal by the