as always, "the story" continues. i will see you monday noon eastern with "outnumbered" and at 1:00 p.m. eastern for "outnumbered over time." have a great weekend. ♪ >> tucker: good evening, and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." the story of american decline is a story of an incompetent ruling class. we will hear many self-serving explanations for it but the truth is it's that simple. the people in charge inherited an industrial superpower and in a little more of a generation that squandered all of it. they exchanged short-term profits, bigger vacation homes, cheaper household help. they built what they did not build. they imported a surf class to drive down wages and crippled the middle class while doing it. they had trillions in unpayable debt, turn the finest

universities of the world into a joke. they watch from their decadent little bubbles of affluence as family, faith, public decency died in this country and they laughed because they didn't care. how people this awful wound up in charge of a nation as great as ours is a question historians will have to answer, and they will someday. at this point, the population has grown tired of it. donald trump election is one clear sign of that. the rise of bernie sanders is another. the ruling class in other words is losing its grip on power and they can feel it. they can smell it. it terrifies them. the first response was denial, it always is for the retreat into fantasy. why can't we just elect joe biden and make it 2009 again. when it didn't work, they reverted to their governing instinct which is authoritarianism for they stop convincing the public of anything and instead decided to scare them. fear for old are easier to control. you saw it in the front page, "new york times," lawmakers

warning that russia is meddling to help elect trump. inside the story, it was enough to alert the and cable news, time to do their job now and always which is to run interference for the people in charge. when you watch the following clip, most people in television have no idea what they are saying even as they are saying it, they are reading the script written for them by some 23-year-old women studies major from leslie and who makes less than they do. try not to judge them to partially. >> donald trump desperately trying to keep that matter secret. >> if the russians are attacking our election processes and doing so to benefit donald trump, i think the president welcomes it, wants it. >> as bad as it is the russians are back at it, trying to help trump get elected, it's far worse that the president of the

united states is trying to cover it up. >> the president is a russian operative. that sounds like the description of a bad hollywood screenplay but it is real. it is vladimir putin's greatest achievement. this is one o one of the shockis days if you retain the capacity to be shocked in the trump era, the trump regime, which may better be labeled as the trump-putin regime. >> tucker: the president of united states has colluded with vladimir putin to steal the election but not the last one, not this one, but this one in the next one too. the public does not seem especially afraid of. maybe they've heard it before from somewhere. the lack of panic is deeply distressing to the democratic party which is counting on another red scare sometime between now and november. brian williams, trustee brian williams stepped into school in america not being more terrified.

>> we begin that funeral services pending the death of outrage, officially dead at its close relative, apathy, survives and is thriving. >> tucker: got that? screw you, america. you ought to be falling for it a second time. how dare you. you can see the frustration on their faces. on the other hand, you might think they would come up with a new hoax occasionally. why they cannot invent argentine sappers, something interesting. no, like a robot vacuum cleaners stuck carving circles under a chair, they are going to do the same thing over and over until the batteries run out. now they are trying it on bern bernie. >> you asked the question, would you want trump over bernie sanders? bernie sanders a democratic

socialist, ideologically into the with the old russia, anyway, and a remember, the russians did favorite bernie sanders in the primary 2015 over hillary clinton. >> tucker: bernie sanders? he's a putin stooge question mike i thought he was a brezhnev stooge. "the washington post" reported that "bernie sanders briefed by u.s. officials that russia is trying to help his presidential campaign." he learned about it weeks ago but the sanders campaign never leaked the story. on the eve of the nevada caucuses, someone in the so-called intelligence committee did leak it. as they repeatedly leak selective information in an effort to derail donald trump whose policies they agree with they'll make with disagree with. our democratic system is in fact under attack. that much is true. but it's not the russians

attacking it, not even the chinese. it's being attacked by our only ruling class for they are undermining democracy. if they let voters decide where to go next, they'd be out of a job tomorrow because they've been terrible stewards of this country. some of them would be in jail pair they subvert our system, likelihood depends on it. aaron mate is a journalist, joins us tonight. the russia collusion resurrected applied to bernie sanders bread trump, bernie sanders, the two people who pose a credible threat the way things are is being tarred by the so-called intelligence community. >> i think it's fair. we know now why trump was targeted with his whole russia scam. when he came into office, he was campaigning on having better relations with russia and scaling back foreign wars that have destroyed foreign countries like a rock, libya, syria,

helping the working class at home. the one impact of accusing him being a puppet of putin that his policies have been incredibly hawkish. he's been tougher on russia than almost anybody else. he has torn up nuclear treaties committee has increased war games on russia's borders, he's trying to overthrow russia's ally in venezuela and imposing sanctions in the process. in that respect, the national security state got what it wanted out of trump on that. it still bringing him down because the collusion thing was such a scam. it's no surprise to see the same playbook being deployed against bernie sanders because bernie sanders is also talking about scaling back foreign wars and helping the working class. i think one big difference is that bernie sanders has an actual record of doing it, of challenging foreign wars and being a champion for the average person and he also has, unlike

trump who relies on billionaires like sheldon adelson and robert mercer, bernie sanders has a working-class movement behind him. a working-class movement talking about challenging foreign wars and spending money on health care for everybody, increasing wages at home. things that people actually need and having immobilized working-class movement is a huge threat to the establishment that is relied to this date on donor, big donors and lobbyists. >> tucker: let me ask you one thing. if trump is no threat to national security state, why are they readers directing the russia hoax? >> this is been a great way to keep him in line. did talk about having better relations with russia and whatever his intentions were, that isn't totally undermined. right now, the u.s. and russia are in a whole new nuclear arms race. for them to do this is a good way to keep them in check. they obviously do not seem as a suitable steward for the war machine. he has radically called it out

and talked about a military industrial complex but they did not want someone to identify it by name, they want someone who can carry out the u.s. empire quietly and bomb countries with less braggadocio than trump has. >> tucker: the truth is russia is not a threat to us and that's why they are telling us it is a threat. there are countries there are, that's not one of them. so as america as failing as talisman loses its grip on power, they aren't pushing conspiracy theories, though they are. they are trying to clamp down on your ability to say what you think is true. for michael bloomberg's disastrous debate on tuesday night, his campaign team did what campaign teams do, they try to put a gloss on it. they put up another video that told the story from their perspective. here it is. >> i'm the only one here who here who ever started a business. is that fair?

okay. >> tucker: that was kind of amusing. is that what actually happened in real time at the debate stage? obviously not. it was a parody and a form of political expression, the kind we use to tolerate without a thought. it was a joke. but today, the press was outraged by how they said bloomberg was pushing a doctored video. we aren't here to defend michael bloomberg for his campaign as an insult to the idea of democracy but the truth is free speech is more important than the election. what they are trying to do is squelch for speech and they call it misinformation. some call it a deep pig, a term that refers to fabricated videos using advanced technolog

technology. had more menacing purpose, to justify an intense thing push for tech censorship which they want. >> that campaign said it was tongue-in-cheek but when somebody sends you that clip for the debate, looks really good for the mayor and bath everyone else which is not true. >> we reached out to twitter, this is an example, this is something he would flag is not real. that's the thing. that clip, it wasn't a second or two of silence, that was the quickest. people might take it seriously. that's how disinformation sort of steamrolled and if nobody is going to stop it, that could change the narrative, change the outcome of the election. we have been there before. >> my bosses right outside offset, but in canada, we call it short form b.s. twitter seriously reporting that video labeling it as manipulated, which it should

because it obviously is. >> tucker: did you see that? the first guy, not the bald guy but the guy with the hair gel, calling himself a journalist looking right in the camera and saying that if somebody doesn't stop it, in other words prevent a campaign putting out a video that somehow the election results will turn out the way he wants. a journalist calling for censorship! that didn't used to happen. how do you think they are going to treat you? buck sexton hosts "the buck sexton show." a super quick theory on this, why is the media for censorship question what they've lost control of the story line, no longer the gatekeepers. they are challenged by the internet which is hard to corral and control, they want to clamp down on it so they can regain their cartel to monopoly over information. >> that's a part of it but also a desperation right now among those in the media who idea mostly as activists, people that

want a certain outcome, they want a democrat to win. they aren't sure which one necessarily yet, probably not that bernie sanders, but they do not want it to be donald trump and that desperation leads us seeing a bit more of a totalitarian impulse they are willing to display sometimes especially when it comes to the tech class. this is an area we know there is an advantage on the left, there has been a long time. we keep seeing these term of service violations were only conservatives get banned, there is some new regulation that comes in and you mentioned effectively a social credit system on youtube now where people will be able to mark whether something is truthful or not but hillary clinton, former secretary of state and presidential nominee called trump putin's puppet on twitter. we get to up like that when it's absurd! >> tucker: does it strike you that there are children reluctance is what social media competencies are proposing and what china does, keeping speech and thought under the thumb of centralized control or

the people who stray will be punished! >> this is organizations like cnn pretending they are preventing facts and the people who disagree with their clearly partisan democrat narrative are at issue with the facts and that's the only reason why anybody would ever criticize them. the tech companies are being called on to do what as you pointed out the mainstream media no longer really can do which is direct the conversation, control the bounds of what's acceptable. satire is very effective and there are some great satire out there from conservatives. there are others and they did not want that because if you look at the democrat field right now, it's right for satire and people will see how absurd it is to have the socialist with three houses. conservatives have been mentioning that, i've been talking about it for years. this is not new, but when the means get going and it becomes sticky, it stays in her

consciousness, it can have an effect. they want to shut that stuff down for they want to make sure these are journalist in particular that the social media companies snapped to attention when the democrats say so. they still view it essentially is a province of the left and of progressives. >> tucker: where are the elected officials in charge of protecting the first amendment, protecting our first amendment rights. where are they? why are they not doing sunning to protect us? >> the tech companies do this whole new world neutral, they do the neutrality dance where everybody knows it's preposterous. people have been banned, i have friends who have been banned and suspended beer they keep doing this and i have a podcast for a syndicated radio show. i have bloomberg ads they are because i have to, because the regulations say if you are taking political ads, you have to take them from both sides. we have regulations on radio come regulations on tv, but social media companies always want to say, no, we'll do this the right way and the right way seems to be going against

conservatives and in an election year, that makes a big difference and they know this. >> tucker: may be republican senators could stand up for their voters bid buck sexton, you have me have seen elizabeth warren delivering a to bloomberg. how is the campaign bearing now. exhausted? we'll tell you after the break. pods puts you in control

with our moving and storage solutions. pack what you want, we store it for as long as you want. then, we deliver it where you want, so whether you need to move or store your things, pods is here to help you with flexible moving and storage solutions. and with the sxfinity stream app, screen is your big screen.e or store your things, which is free with your service, you can take a spin through on demand shows, or stream live tv. download your dvr'd shows and movies on the fly. even record from right where you are. whether you're travelling around the country

or around the house, keep what you watch with you. download the xfinity stream app and watch all the shows you love. >> tucker: much closer tonight finding out where the fallen studio mogul harvey weinstein will be spending time in prison.

the trial is wrapping up. chief correspondent trace gallagher has the latest on that. >> harvey weinstein facing five separate charges involving the alleged rape of two women. the court has reached a verdict on three of the five charges which if he's found guilty would put him in prison for several years. but the jury could not reach a decision on the two most serious charges of predatory sexual assault which could put him in prison for life. defense attorneys said they were fine with the verdict but they wanted the jury to keep deliberating so judge james burke sent them back to the jury room for a short time and excuse them for the weekend. before reaching a partial verdict, the jury as to revisit the testimony of annabella c annabella sikora, she's the her testimony is still critical because to prove the more serious charge of predatory

assault, prosecutors have to show a pattern. showing that harvey weinstein had a prior history of rape. >> tucker: trace gallagher, thank you so much for that. you probably saw it, mayor michael bloomberg had a very rough time wednesday night, courtesy of elizabeth warren, invited her in her shame dunge dungeon. >> i'd like to talk about who we are running against, a billionaire who calls women fat broad's and horse faced. no, i'm not talking about donald trump, i'm talking about mayor bloomberg. democrats are not going to win if we have a nominee who has a history of hiding his tax returns, of harassing women, and supporting racist policies. democrats take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another. >> tucker: he paid

$460 million for that spanking did he enjoy in question but we can't say. it was weird to see a play on television, strangely into men. it would've been enough to end's presence campaign but bloomberg is not a normal candidate, he's a billionaire with $60 million in the bank. yesterday he picked up three more congressional endorsements. in the wake of what you just saw, a disaster on stage, three more members of congress endorsed michael bloomberg, which suggests that in the end, bloomberg's performance, his ideas, his history question mike all irrelevant. it's all about the money. sean davis, founded "the federalist," very smart man. thank you for coming on. this is a theory but i don't know if it's true, running the kind of campaign that anybody has ever run, a campaign in which what he says, what he thinks, all irrelevant. all that matters is his money. do you think that's what we are

watching? >> right. getting to see in real time whether a candidate with no charisma, no real rationale for running, no base of support can actually buy the nomination and i was kind of amazed, i think that might've been the first time in television history that we saw a guy pay half billion dollars get spanked by an indian. >> tucker: i'm stealing that. it's either a species of masochism or watching something something that's so cynical that it puts a chill down your body. a guy that does not believe in democracy at all. thinks the system is ridiculous, he can walk in and flood the zone with cash and will all obey. is that what you think? >> i don't know. maybe he thought he could go in the debate and throw the other candidates above the wall. that's what he is generally done with his opponent in government previously. if you look back at 2016, the

democratic establishment decided they would make sure that bernie sanders wasn't going to win denominations are they rigged it. at least than they had enough shame and good sense to hide it. here in 2020, what we are seeing is why the democrat establishment is going to use a billion dollars of someone else's money, mainly in mike bloomberg's, to steal the nomination from bernie sanders. that's what it looks like from the outside bear this guy has the most votes. somehow doesn't have the most delegates, and he's obviously the front runner in the matter what he does but he can't catch a break. in the batter were mike bloomberg is somehow on somehow they decided he got to be on the stage. >> tucker: give me the 22nd answered at this bird can he of bernie sanders winds up with more delegates, not a majority, but a plurality, can bloomberg actually become the nominee at that point? >> i checked ahead of your show

but there are no technical laws against swaying delegates. why not go ahead and buy make delegates during a second ballot? >> tucker: right. why not reveal it's all fake. it's a kind of nihilism, actually, and it's scary. we should not have this in our system. thank you. too good. one of the president's top advisors does not like the president. he said so. he doesn't like the president a agenda. why is he in an authority in the white house? will ask that question expert plus a fanatical colt could be spreading the coronavirus. is the threat higher than ever? we've got details on that. the frels family runs with us on a john deere 1 series tractor. because this is more than just land, it's home. search "john deere 1 series" for more.

>> tucker: over the last 40 years, america has become a far richer country than it's ever been. not everyone has enjoyed the benefits of that. many americans in fact have fallen backwards but from 1979 to 2013, real wages for low skilled workers dropped by 5%. meanwhile, in a single year, 2016 them a private jet travel increased by more than 8%. this is an ominous trend. economically stratified countries are unstable countries, but recently there have been signs of hope. wages for low skilled workers are growing at the fastest rate in memory right now, nearly 5% a year. for those at the very bottom of the labor pool, those without haskell diplomas, wages went up a full 10% last year.

those are something that we should celebrate. it makes america stronger and less prone to the kind of radicalism we are seeing on the horizon. why are things suddenly getting better? it's simple. we are enjoying a tight labor market right now. immigration to our country is down from employment is up. that means there are fewer available workers bear therefore workers must pay higher wages to those workers. it's called supply and demand. the most basic principle in economics. also the healthiest and most efficient way to share the wealth. it does what socialism claims to do but without hurting people. the labor market is something that donald trump ran on in 2016. it may be his single greatest, spend. but now, but, bizarrely, one of his closest aides seem determined to ruin the president's achievement. acting white house chief of staff mick mulvaney complained to a private audience at a speech in the u.k. that the trump ministrations immigration slow down has been a disaster.

according to mulvaney, america is "desperate, desperate for more people. we are running out of people to feel the economic growth that we've had in our nation over the last four years. we need more immigrants." everything about that statement is dishonest and stupid. for one thing, americans don't want more immigration. a lot of pulling on it. 2018, a harvard harris poll found that 81% of american voters support curbing immigration levels. in a democracy, public opinion should matter. but even more basically, america isn't running out of people. far from it. ask anyone who tried to drive to work in one of our major cities. america is a crowded country and that is bad, that's why rent is so high for example. official employment rains an accurate story on our labor market but as of tonight, there are 40 million american men over the age of 16 were out of work. two and a half-million say they want a job but can't find one. more than 7 million of them have

left the labor force despite being in their prime working years, 25-54. some of them are just discouraged, some of them are addicted to drugs, video games, social welfare checks posing as disability. there are fellow americans, they built this country literally. we have an obligation to do everything to help them flourish but a ruling class which has betrayed them would rather pretend they didn't exist. these people are dying in huge numbers. nobody in washington cares, least of all mick mulvaney. he'd rather replace our american working class with ungrateful foreigners who would work for less. that way wages pay low. this is the opposite of what donald trump ran on. it's what he railed against in speech after speech. so why is mick mulvaney passionately disagrees with donald trump running donald trump's white house? it's almost like mulvaney is trying to undermine his boss'

agenda. that shouldn't surprise you. mulvaney despises donald trump, said so on camera. >> [indistinct] >> tucker: that was in 2016. mulvaney isn't talking like that anymore. at least not on camera. but if you want to know what people think, don't listen to what they say, watch what they do. well, the government of china claims it is bringing the deadly coronavirus under control. it's not clear that's true. the disease is now threatening to become a worldwide pandemic where there are deaths in country it was like italy and iran. so far we have not had them here. a cruise ship where more than 100 passengers fell ill is set back to service and set sail in a couple of months. could be desperately because in korea, a coronavirus cult is

spreading the virus on purpose. amazing story with harris faulkner, and a host of "outnumber," thank you for sharg the story tonight for this story sounds like it's not even real. what is this? >> when you hear the word cult, you want to drill down. it's a fringe religious group, a cult is what it's called. why are they looking at it? in south korea, let's start with this part of the breaking news on this breaking friday, south korea they've seen such a disturbing spike in the last 24 hours. the center of disease control and prevention says they have 53 additional patients who tested positive for coronavirus. in addition to 20 from the day before. they say, where is all of this coming from? they located this group, this

temple of the tabernacle of testimony, shincheonji is the group, theyt is may be a super spreader situation, they were not allowig people to wear masks, not allowing them to wear protective glasses, they have them in these tight group of worshipers and they were there hours at a time. the group is denying that that is its policy, but because so many people let this one event and tested positive so quickly for coronavirus, they said it was a super spreader situation. let's take that and consider it as lesson a, let's go to the diamond princess shipped now, you have that times 3700 people and you now have a spreading situation of 600. and the representatives, and mr. fauchi from the representatives of how they felt what they tried to do on the coast of japan on that ship, it could be a lot worse. today we saw two deaths from

passengers on board there. you have two super spreader like situations ben tucker, it seems so simple. you put people together, don't protect them enough, you don't have a quarantine tight situation that are going to buffets early on in the ship before the captain made them go back to their rooms? these are nightmare scenarios. now they fanned out, you mentioned iran, turkey sending fast track tips to help them discover the virus in places like is pakistan and because extend. countries all over the world i don't want to freak you out on a friday, but this is real. a couple of ways in america plays a part. we've been offering help from the beginning. we've got a bio containment unit that became famous under the ebola outbreak a few years ago. that's in nebraska, that's where some of these passengers were taken. i interviewed one of them off that ship. they are there. they've got a great chance of survival.

that's great. they also can study the disease. you mentioned austin, texas, coming up with that vaccine. they are able to study this in real time. but it's still going to take 18 months for a vaccine. that is a long haul. i hope where they are seeing burgeoning numbers in south korea and now japan, japan calling off a marathon for thousands of people, cutting down on events with its leadership. i hope that they can get a handle on the spread of this while we work on a vaccine. >> tucker: the people i know who know the most about this, you would be at the top of this list, are the most concerned about it there that tells you an awful lot. harris, thank you for that update but hope you come back. >> of course! you are my friend. >> tucker: great to see you tonight. happy weekend. another story that we've told you about for some years, even as we reported it. on one level it seemed too absurd to be true, but it's

molly community leader confirms that ilhan omar really did marry her brother. is that true, should we believe him? details on that amazing story next. . but they aren't listening. they've just raised the prices of over five hundred drugs. president trump supports a bipartisan plan, that would force drug companies to lower prices. but the senate won't act. tell senate leaders to stop drug company price gouging and lower drug prices now.

let me tell you something, i wouldn't be here if i thought reverse mortgages took advantage of any american senior, or worse, that it was some way to take your home.

learn how homeowners are strategically using a reverse mortgage loan to cover expenses, pay for healthcare, preserve your portfolio and so much more. a reverse mortgage loan isn't some kind of trick to take your home. it's a loan, like any other. big difference is how you pay it back. find out how reverse mortgages really work with aag's free, no-obligation reverse mortgage guide. with a reverse mortgage, you can pay whatever you can, when it works for you, or, you can wait, and pay it off in one lump sum when you leave your home. discover the option that's best for you. call today and find out more. i'm proud to be a part of aag, i trust em, i think you can too.

>> tucker: there is a new scam going on in this country. it's almost everywhere. not some guy that came his uncle is a nigerian prince. this game entrench itself in every school, company, nonprofit in the united states. very popular with the people in charge, praised in congress by many republicans. it goes by many names, by his training, sensitivity training, diversity training. nobody can criticize it because the name sounds so virtuous. if you know what it is, you're

crowded into a room where political radicals say you are racist, sexist, anti-gay on the inside. nothing you can do about it, it's a form of original sin. if this hasn't happened to you, you probably don't have a job because everybody goes through it. anytime there's some dumb controversy in america whether there is some ill-advised or offensive graffiti by a 12-year-old in the john somewhere or another fake hate crime, the moment is used to demand even more biased training. thousands of people earn a living selling this garbage to the country. if you study gender studies, racial studies, postcolonial theory or any of the branches of grievous inc., it's annoying. half training of biased training course can cause 6 grams you will see that billions of

dollars are spent on this. this is a sector of our economy! not even accounting for lost productivity here. a key question that nobody ever asks, is it useful? does sensitivity training, diversity training do anything worth doing? it turns out, no, it doesn't! we know because it's been studied extensively. for example, a 2015 paper in the journal of applied psychology, probably not a right wing publication, took a close look at biased training and saw it's actually counterproductive, not a surprise to anyone who is wise. people receive bias training were more prone to racial and gender stereotyping. you may have sensed it, but this is true. in 2018, a u.k. government study found that bias training does nothing to change people's behavior. a study from 2000 show that people trained to avoid

anti-elderly bias became even more biased against elderly job applicants but you can find countless more examples, we don't have to. this company has been drowning in sensitivity training the past 30 years making some of the most dumbest and lowest them people in america rich, but what's the effect? is the country and less racist less sexist? we are getting more that way, more divided along those lines. if anything, politics is more entrenched. why question my thanks to the people who pushed bias training on the rest of us. they are the one who are most determined to sort and judge us by our, skin color, things we have no control over at all. the push for bias training is the latest case of the left projecting his claws onto the country. they call you racist because they are. as you know. here's a story that's incredible. so remarkable, so over-the-top, you think we are making it up. we wish we were but we are not. a leader in minnesota's symbolic

community now says in public that ilhan omar actually did marry her own brother, biological brother. omar sticking the same strategy, she is denied attacked anybody who says it as racist. on twitter, omar called the story hate speech, meaning she think it'll be a band that you can't say bad things about me, i'm a member of congress -- she claims her somali accuser brag about lying -- she's a liar, as you know. helped break the story five years ago. so good to see you. i want to say before we explain what we now know, you are owed an apology by virtually every blue check on twitter ever in in the media dismissed as a conspiracy not. looks like tonight to be true, tell us what we know. >> don't get me going.

you are referring to a story published in the daily mail yesterday, the daily mail is the most widely read english language website in the world, a lot of it is tabloid news and it has pursue the ilhan omar scandal in tabloid format, but they sent a reporter to the town last week to look into omar-related stories. i met with him and sent him in the right direction. he published the story yesterday to the effect of what you just reported, that ilhan omar in fact married her brother in 2009. didn't get around to divorcing them until 2017, the marriage was for fraudulent purposes. it's kind of a joke. the story that i've been telling to anyone who would listen. now it's in the daily mail. had a huge impact in the somali immunity in the twin cities which is divided among clans and

ilhan's family is not taking -- didn't mention her most recent tweet as an anti-sec diatribe against david steinberg. this story has been told over the last three and a half years in two parts. one is through social media investigation by. hams taking that path, they told the story about a fraudulent marriage for fraudulent purposes. among the documents that were turned up in that respect were that the marriage certificate involving this fraudulent marriage signed by a christian manager. there's that part of the story... >> tucker: finished up for me, if you would.

>> another path of somali sources, another interesting source of the "daily mail" source, his name is abdi noor, and has given me information that proved out and sent me in the right direction which is the story that i've been telling in that format. >> a strange telling in the face of a lot of opposition. good for you for telling the truth. we'll talk to you when this is confirmed. great to see you tonight. president trump is a fan of wanting the most popular movies ever made in english. you know what that means but he's a bigot! will break down why depressed now hates "gone with the wind." really? really? "wizard of oz" next?

.

>> where do i go? what do i do? >> frankly, my dear, i don't give a damn. >> tucker: the highest grossing film in the history of american cinema, one of the greatest, "gone with the when", you probably saw it when you were young and loved it. last year the president lamented where the greatest films by a movie from cree kwa. >> and the movie from south kroo yeah. what's that about? we have enough problems up from south korea with trade. on top of it, they give them the best movie of the yore, good, i don't know? can we get gone with the wind back, please? >> tucker: there he is, the

republican rooting for the film industry because it's american. that's not the way the press analyzed it. no, there must be a sinister second layer. the president's love of gone with the wind was, of course, racist. >> gone with the wind is subordinating black people to white folk. >> racist, sunset boulevard. about a celebrity who loses touch with reality >> another way of reminding people of cultural themes that he likes to talk about. this is not the country that it should be. this is not the country we want it to be. he brings up whatever culture -- >> to make it to be great. >> in, make america great again. >> oh he acts like let's bring back "gone with the wind," let's bring back mamie with the handkerchief on her head. bring back the civil war, bring back slaves. >> tucker: the dumbest people in the world are on television, literally. they're screened for dumbness.

michael austin is not dumb. he's a comedian. he joins us tonight. so when you watch -- do you feel guilty like you by accident watch "gone with the wind"? >> no, it's a great piece of american film making. i feel bad of all of the people at the height of trump derangement symptom that michael eric dyson on tv had to mute his comments on "the view" when you know you have a problem when joy behar is like, whoa, that's too far out there even for me. that's like ax l rose saying you drink too much. >> he lives in my neighborhood, i swear. >> you can hear him in the morning eating dictionaries. >> downtrodden. literally. >> you're concluded that "gone with the wind" is racist. you ear saying anything that happened before last year in america is immoral and we want to remake the place completely, i think.

that's what they're saying. >> it is. anything that trump mentions is racist. at this point, blink willing be racist. smiling, using hand gestures is somehow racist. it's horrible. "gone with the wind" is a great piece of american cinema and the most successful film of all time. ry no rob with an americanle movie winning best picture. i loved "parasite" but that's foreign language fill up. let's bring the oscars back home. that's not racist, it's pro america. >> tucker: shouldn't be there a test before you go on television as like a pundit that you should have something interesting to say? you're not parroting a talking point from "the new york times," no? >> this is when the giant hook comes and gets me off of the screen. i like to think for myself, i like to be an original. kwus to watch all these people, yeah, we should bring back the old time bugs bunny hook where you can say, hey, people like

michael eric dyson. can we just say mike dyson? we should bring the hook and get him off of the stage. >> tucker: thank you. that's it for us tonight. have the best weekend. we'll see you next time. >> special to this special edition of hannity, trump versus the left, tonight 256 days away from the presidential election and the presidential party is going broke. the dnc is less than $10 million cash on hand. in contrast, the rnc has nearly $80 million, the 2020 candidates aren't faring much better. prfrpt builds a massive war chest, the opponents are hemorrhaging money on the campaign trail. none of this matters to mike bloomberg who is trying to buy the race. he has so much money