shower, maybe even a phone. he will also wear a tan jumpsuit indicating he has not been sentenced yet. >> trace gallagher, thank you. we will always be fair and balanced, not the hate or psychotic media mob. >> i'm raymond arroyo in for laura ingraham, this is the ingram angle from washington tonight. chuck schumer's threat against conservative justices. even though they preach acceptance for all, are the democrats actually the party of silence and violence goes to mark congressman matt gaetz, dispel the myth of liberal tolerance. a failed presidential candidate bill de blasio is added again, wait until you hear his latest comments about black voters. but first, for months the democrat and media elites not

only touted their 2020 field as the most exciting ever, it was also the most diverse. >> people really are excited about the field. >> it is easily the most diverse field for president ever the 2020 democratic field is taking shape. >> there are more women running for president in the fields that have ever run for president in any one field. >> this is a field i think democrats can be proud of. >> raymond: today their diversity dreams came crashing down when elizabeth warren announced her decision to end her presidential campaign. which means, the most diverse field ever has been whittled down to two very old white men. don't you wish walter mashal and jack lemmon were still around to do the movie? the media has been desperately searching for a way to spend more in the end of other female candidates failures but all they could come up with with this. >> i think women always say it is a double standard, they are taxed more when they make mistakes and it is harder for

them to gain traction and fund-raising and organizing. >> elizabeth warren had trouble at fund-raising, you can't remove the sexism. it is all built in, we punish them harder than we do male candidates. >> raymond: where have i heard that before? >> are you a victim of misogyny? why do you think you lost a majority of the white female vote? the people who want to be protected from the kind of changes you are talking about right now. >> i do think it played a role. >> raymond: joining me now is mercedes schlapp, trump 2020 campaign senior advisor and tezlyn figaro, former staffer for the sanders 2016 campaign. mercedes, it's sexism the reason that amy klobuchar and kamala harris and warren and gillibrand were rejected by democratic voters? >> you have to look at what message they were pushing, warren for example was focused on the anticorruption message, super pac money which she said

she wasn't going to take but then she took, when she started present in her plans like medice for all and they were like how are you going to pay for this? he would have to raise taxes for the middle class, correct? that's where she was going with it, it is not about sexism it is about bad policy with these messengers who obviously weren't able to win the hearts of the democratic voters. >> raymond: i want you to react to this, here is how elizabeth warren explain her loss today. watch. >> if you say, yeah, there was sexism in this race everyone says. and if you say, there was no sexism about a brazilia billion. i will have a lot more to say on that later on. >> raymond: it sounds like she doesn't trust the voters, the democratic voters. is that what you're hearing? >> unfortunately i was a big fan of elizabeth warren, i think she

was one of the strongest of debaters the stage. we all know the sexism exists, this was about strategy. unfortunately senator warren lost her home state, who has voted her in numerous times. this came down to the bottom line, she was the saying she was not a capitalist until the tenth debate, she allowed bernie sanders to pull her too far to the left. now everyone has to eat humble pie and realize there are more moderates within his party than what they think. i work for senator sanders but i am an independent, i am also a small business owner and i am not a socialist. those people forgot about that, elizabeth warren one moment she is saying i am a capitalist, next minute she is leaning more toward socialism. her strategy was off, she was trying to please too many tribes, that is the bottom line. actual voters are real, particularly those here. >> raymond: the lying factor here, ladies, she has lied about

her heritage, she lied about her father being a janitor. that stacks up, and it does have an influence in a final impact. >> no question, for the democrats there is a struggle, this fracture happening of the far left and the socialist agenda of bernie sanders. the establishments are as panicking and are like we have to rally around biden, immediately. despite all the gaps, the controversies with his son hunter biden, he is a truly weak, weak frontrunner. what you are saying is despite warren going out, she will have an important role to play in convention. she has 50 delegates, she still will be influential over those delegates. >> raymond: i want to get to that in a moment, and her endorsement. nancy pelosi reacted to liz warren's withdrawal this way. >> i so wish every time i get introduced as the most powerful woman, i almost cried because i think i wish that were not true. i wish that we had a woman president of the united states,

i think the american people are ready. >> raymond: very quickly, what is the end game here? when the fact is, nancy pelosi was the one pushing the 77-year-old white guy who was running correct? >> absolutely correct, i'm really getting offended with hearing the democratic party talk about we need a woman. what type of woman are they talking about? a black woman, the women that actually saved joe biden over this last weekend? bill de blasio talking about the black vote, i believe he needs to shut his mouth. democrats need to get it together, i don't see elizabeth warren endorsing anyone. i think she will do just like she did in 2016 and wait until the actual nominee is selected. >> raymond: you got ahead of me, let me show this video. mercedes, i want you to react to this. this is sanders, i couldn't get it out, biden, sanders, now i'm

sounding like joe biden. here is sanders, watch. >> certainly, i have a lot of respect for senator warren. and would love to sit down and talk to her about what kind of role she can play in our administration. >> raymond: warren is also talking to joe biden, who will she endorse motion mark or does she take the obama road, hang back and let it settle? >> i would say stay back, wait to see what happens because remember, bernie and warren went after each other during that time. the losing strategy for democrats has been identity politics, they lost in 2016 because of it because they keep trying to divide americans. he unites americans, it is all about opportunity for all. black, latino, women, white, that is where we need to be. as opposed to this identity politics, we need to have a woman president or a black president, look, the american people are going to vote the person who is best qualified for

the job. obviously, we know that president trump has been able and is continuing to grow his coalition with women, with blacks, with latinos. >> raymond: how does this ultimately wind up? there is such a focus here on checking the female box, you have to have a female president, you have to have a woman leader. we had that plethora of women in the beginning, they suddenly stay home now that there are no female candidates? >> and some will, just like some black voters have stayed home. this is an issue that i understand republicans want to jump ahead and talk talk about what it would be like in the general, as far as the democratic party there are people who feel as if the their concerns have not been addressed. the democratic party has always said they are the party of diversity but they seem to pick and choose who has priority. they have created this fracture, what you were saying about

dividing up folks. thithe democratic party has put themselves here by continuing to take advantage of certain groups, let me be clear when i say certain groups i mean black voters, i am not talking about people of color i am talking about minority groups. there are people who are resentful, that needs to heal and it needs to heal by actually having results, not prayer, not stopping by the church, and not singing a hymn andrew yang. but actually providing true results and true tangible benefits that we can put our hands on and that is what they are looking for. >> raymond: mercedes, react to that. how will president trump capitalize on this division? particularly what we just heard there about taking the black vote for granted. there is no doubt the democrats. >> i think she is saying the right things, let me tell you, this campaign and the president is focused on reaching out to the black voters.

we are just opening up these black voices offices, it is really important. republicans have never done this effectively, i am telling you president donald trump is taking it to the next level. why? he knows he is not going to take the black vote for granted, his agenda is about making sure criminal justice reform, real result in that community that uplift the black community which the democrats have taken for granted. >> raymond: ladies, thank you. a brilliant analysis and i think you both for being so honest. as laura said last night, joe biden won't actually be in charge of the things if he is elected president. he will be a geriatric pinocchio whose strings will be pulled by the politicians, activists, or donors currently propping him up. that includes big donor mike bloomberg. this is bloomberg's former campaign advisor on what joe biden will be getting out of the deal. >> mike will to the full extent

possible back joe biden's campaign. we have a huge ground operation, hawk fish is an enormously successful photo identification and turn out tool. we have a great field office across the country, those are going to stay open in the battleground states. >> what that means is that mike bloomberg is going to have more power than any ordinary american will in a biden and administration. which of course is great news for china. joining me now, victor davis sampson. senior fellow at the hoover institution. for a party so worried about russia collusion and an election, they seem to be fine with the outside influence and importance of mike bloomberg. who apparently will have a much bigger influence than appearances would lead us to believe. >> yeah, i don't think the problem is mike bloomberg is worth $60 billion or it's a free country in china, or that he tried to buy the democratic primary nomination.

we all know that, but the problem is that he doesn't know how to distinguish dictatorships from constitutional government. he is on record saying the president of china is not a dictator, the vice president is the most influential man in the world. second, he runs one of the most influential news organizations that deals with matters of global finance. and he sensors stories, his organization does that are critical of the chinese communist government. so he filters the news to an american audience through the lenses of his own interest in china. most important, he is engaged right now and one of the most massive efforts to bring american financial power into the chinese market to help his company that are suffering in trade war with china among which about 45% of them are run by the chinese communist party. what that boils down to is essentially michael bloomberg is using his plan for cloud, his journalists power, to bring

american capital to help the chinese communist power. he is going to use all of these resources we saw in his failed presidential bid and use them to the service of joe biden. if that is disturbing to me. you see how joe biden modulates his foreign policy views towards china. china. >> raymond: victor, i alluded to this earlier in the intro but bloomberg spent $35 million on ads. russian facebook ads that everybody lost their lunch over, $135,000. $35 million, $135,000, and we are worried about russian collusion. part of what he is promising biden is accessed to his social media arm, does networking he has created. as an example of what they do, here is how they responded online to trump mocking bloomberg's exit from the race. this is online, watch.

>> you can strike me down, i shall become more powerful. then you could possibly imagine. >> raymond: that was it, no branding or anything else. today, this is how the trump campaign struck back. with this gift of trump holding bloomberg at bay and not getting hit by the lifesaver. what good is a media platform if your content is so off key or fails to resonate with voters as bloomberg's obviously did or he would be the nominee in the democratic party? >> to know michael bloomberg and hear him and see him in a debate was not to want to vote for him, his influence is in the shadows because he is not going to be a public figure because to do so is counterproductive for him. we have learned that. what he is going to do is put this enormous expertise about china and profit-making and

journalistic clout in service of a particular candidate and there is no limits to his resources. we just went through a psychodrama for three years about a possible trump hotel in moscow, we went through all the shenanigans and after it was all over we found out there was nothing to it. this is a guy who is going to make billions of dollars in the chinese bond market helping a communist government run companies when they are in an x essential struggle with his own country. that he is going to play a major role in the biden campaign. >> raymond: no wonder bernie sanders is so upset, about his intrusion. >> absolutely. >> raymond: i have to get to this before run out of time, bill clinton is opening up about his affair with monica lewinsky. here is what he said in a hulu documentary about his wife of all people. we will put it on the screen, you feel like you're staggering around, you are in a 15 round prize fight. here is something that will take

your mind off of it for a while, i thought i could think about the most stupid thing to do and do it. to manage my anxieties for yea years. >> raymond: can you believe he is trying to justify his affair, writing it off as a way to manage his anxieties? in a documentary about hillary, of all things. >> he always does that, he always leaves other people. this is an example of the dehumanization of women. monica lewinsky was an individual, she always had liked him. she had a personality, she wanted to get to know him, and now in retrospect he says she was just something like xanax or valium for me. it is crass and cruel the way he is looking back at that incident, it was tragic the way she was deluded by that sense of power and authority. since then, we know that if any of us did what bill clinton did use our authority to elicit favors from a subordinate we would be fired. he has no remorse about it.

>> raymond: i think you so much. he used her, he used this young girl and he apologized in a backward way saying i feel sorry for what happened, but as you said, he still think of her as a object for his own relief and anxiety. coming up, the angle exposed if the real agenda behind chuck schumer's personal attack on to conservative supreme court justices. do not miss this, stay there. your whole windshield. tk with safelite's exclusive resin, you get a strong repair that you can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace.

>> raymond: welcome back to "the ingraham angle," schumer's real agenda. if that is the focus of tonight's angle. many of us for decades have complained about the rise of judicial activism on the federal

course. too often, especially on social policy judges have played the role of super legislators, over the will of the people. >> our system has been under relentless attack by the left-wing activists who want to take the powers of the elected branches and give that power to unelected federal judges. they want to oppose by judicial decree but they fail to win at the ballot box. i will do everything in my power to halt judicial activism. >> raymond: the president recently had some tough words for justices ginsburg and soto mayor. demanding they recuse themselves after demonstrating overt political bias. >> justice ginsburg should do it because she went wild during the campaign when i was running, she said some things that were obviously very inappropriate. justice total mayor said what she said yesterday, i don't know how they cannot recuse

themselves from anything trump or trump related. >> raymond: i don't recall any public official ever actually threatening judges, at least not until yesterday. as the court was about to hear arguments concerning a louisiana abortion law, senator chuck schumer issued a direct warning on behalf of the abortion lobby. >> i want to tell you cavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> raymond: initially his ranting and raving sounded like a threat of actual violence, one even liberals couldn't defend. >> i am certainly not going to defend what chuck schumer said, it was wrong, it was inappropriate, it did sound like a physical threat. i think if you look at chuck schumer's entire record, if you look at how he behaves, he does not threaten people

visibly. >> raymond: his threat wasn't physical, it was in a way much more corrosive to our republic. he was threatening an issue based impeachment, against the two newest members of the high court. in other words, if you didn't en think about voting in a way that restricts roe v. wade we will annihilate you. he didn't speak casually or thoughtlessly, he was delivering a message to these justices, especially cavanaugh. you may think you are safe with tenure, but if joe biden wins the white house we will turn over every stone in your personal and professional life and devote all our resources to destroying you and removing you from office. they don't think you need high crimes and misdemeanors anymore, a catch all abuse power charge is enough for these fools to start screaming impeachment. after hearing schumer yesterday, you don't think cavanaugh is thinking to himself holy smokes, they are going to put my

family and me through this again? schumer wanted this to be in their minds, as they readied their votes at conference. uphold the state of louisiana law that abortionists must have admitting privileges in hospitals, not just my professional and personal life but that of my law clerks. my spouse, my children. everyone will be fair game as the dems scour for any reason to justify impeachment. there are a few things that need to happen right away. number one, chief justice john roberts must continue to aggressively push back on this, and stand up for the right of each justice to do his or her job without fear of political, professional, or physical replies or roots. his words were a threat, to roberts too, if you don't do what you want we will blow up the entire court. half the country won't trust you will respect this as legitimate

ever again. number two, every democratic senator should be forced to swear they will not move to impeach judges for the rulings they make on the bench. period. they must disavow not just the threat of violence, but schumer's threatening the independence of the court. if senators refuse, republicans should make a really big deal of it and center them. tell the voters that democrats are willing to destroy the entire court in order to save roe v. wade. this is an extremely dangerous moment, and remember, it is to let mike if elected joe biden would be a figurehead. planned parenthood and the center for reproductive rights would essentially be in charge of judges. the democrats, even the so-called moderates are of one mind when it comes to abortion. no limitations, no restrictions. >> a woman does have a right to choose, if they rule it to be unconstitutional i will send to the united states congress and it will pass i believe a bill

that legislates roe v. wade in justified cases. >> i will be a pro-choice president, i want you to know that when you make a decision about who you are voting for. speak up it is very important to me and to most americans to resa woman's right to choose. >> raymond: the democrats are now not only repelling pro-life and religious voters, but excommunicating pro-life democrats from their own ranks. if they want to engage in political litmus tests, have at it. republicans will win every time. but to turn their fire on a branch of government over abortion at a time when the majority of americans want to limitations on the procedure is ruinous and destructive to the well-being of women and their children. and that's the angle. i should confess that that was partially written, mostly written by my friend laura who is a little under weather tonight. that was the understudy

performance. joining me now, walker former associate counsel to george w. bush and former law clerk of justice clarence thomas, sol wisenberg. john eastman, claremont institute senior fellow and constitutional scholar. i want to start with you, have you ever heard a top party individual personally threatening a supreme court justice and how do you think the justice are reacting at this time? >> i have never heard anything so outrageous in my life. i have lived in washington for 30 years, i have never heard any member of a branch of government speak to anybody in the supreme court that way. i think we know what the justices think, the chief stood up today for the integrity of the court and the integrity of the institution. he said we will not be capped by this sort of inappropriate and dangerous behavior, we will all continue to do our jobs. i am confident that justice kavanaugh and course which will

follow the law, do what is required, and they will not be affected one bit by this outrageous gambit. >> chuck schumer offered this half-hearted apology today, watch. >> we speak in strong language, i should not have used the words i did but in no way was i making a threat, i never would do such a thing. and republicans who are busy manufacturing outrage over these comments know that too appeared >> raymond: he was raised on the mean streets of brooklyn, he can't help but be a little threatening in his language. your reaction to that. >> you know, first of all, it's totally protected speech under the first amendment. but it would certainly threatening, the difference between what he did and what his colleagues have been doing for several years now is this threat aspect, this aspect. i have criticized the president for what he has said about

judges in pending cases and what he said about justice sotomayor or and justice ginsburg, not that they are above criticism but i don't think that they should be criticized by the president. in no way did he make president trump any kind of a threat. that puts it on a totally different play, this isn't new. it started in the obama administration, when the president in the state of the union criticized his citizens united while all the supreme cot justices where they to honor h him. as an honorific, they sit there during the state of the union. they don't anymore, he threatened the court right before the first obamacare ruling and you had the brief filed by sheldon white house and four other senators four months ago in that new york gun case where they essentially said the same thing that schumer is saying now. they are clearly i intending if

they win in 2020 to go after these justices, it is extreme the corrosive. the independent judiciary is really the gem of our system, and the envy of the world. that's very, very sad. >> raymond: i want to go to you, obviously schumer is trying, he is out broadcasting this threat before a ruling. particularly about abortion, now i spoke to catrina jackson today who is the state senator in louisiana at the center of this case. she said look, i have been subjected to this kind of language. i have had people threatened to hit me over the head, i have to walk around with police escorts for a year and a half. is there anything, any law, any crime that schumer might have committed in violation of a u.s. statute in making these threats? >> short, you can't threaten public officials like that. let's back up 40 years and figure out what is going on here, the supreme court politicized itself when it decided roe v. wade, it has been that way ever sense.

you can't run for dog catcher in this country without people taking a stance on where you are on abortion. the supreme port should never have gotten involved, the constitution doesn't mention the word. and so it's not a surprise that politicians are going to treat the court politically when they have themselves acted politically in deciding those cases. what is significant here is that brett kavanaugh and neil gorsuch and clarence thomas are going to follow the constitution wherever it leads. that is what chuck schumer and his cronies can't abide by, they want an outcome that favors their political agenda whether the law allows for it or not. that is what really is at stake here. >> raymond: they are no doubt worried, the roe v. wade is as thin as joe biden's hairline at this point. this is the statute that people have been siding, this is 40 u.s. code, 6134. it is unlawful to discharge a

firearm, explosive, set fire to a combustible, make a loud, threatening, or abusive language in the supreme court building or grounds. chuck schumer was there at the behest of a pro-abortion group on the stairs of the supreme court. did he run afoul of that statute? >> i think you probably dead, people should also look at title 18 of our criminal law because the law that john referred to which makes it a felony to threaten a federal official, i think that one senator schumer said arguably does constitute a threat of physical injury. he said you want to know hit y you. >> raymond: i want to play this, this is the president tonight, watch this. spea>> that was a physical thinn my opinion, he said it had to do with the election it has nothing to do with the election. the way he said we would head back like you've never seen before. that was a real intimidation, and the best you can say is they

are trying to intimidate so that the judge justices vote their w. >> raymond: i know it is protected speech, but it is irresponsible speech. >> is despicable, it is intimidation, it's despicable. but it is constitutionally protected which means that even if it violated some statutes that would never even get to a jury. condemn him, but it is not a crime. >> raymond: before we run out of time, is there, let me go to john eastman, what is the mechanism in article two to impeach supreme court justices? if that what schumer was really alluding to? >> it is hard to say what he is alluding to, he is clearly trying to cower them away from following the law and upholding the louisiana statute. the issue about whether it is a threat or not, threats are not

protected speech. that would lead to eminent lawlessness, if somebody was enraged enough to go in and shoot a justice. schumer could be held liable for that, it is not protected spee speech. >> raymond: we are out of time, thank you for being here. the media often claims president trump is the one in citing mass violence, but is that true? what about the threat of actual violence from the radical left? congressman matt gaetz exposed the hypocrisy, and the latest on the coronavirus in the u.s. when we return. ♪ i want to rock! (rock!)

♪ i want to rock! (rock!) ♪ i want to rock! (rock!) ♪ i want to rock! (rock!) ♪ rock! (rock) ♪ rock! (rock) ♪ rock! (rock) ♪ i want to... (chris rock) who'd you expect? (sylvester stallone) i don't know...me? (vo) ♪ i want to rock!

♪ rock! (rock) ♪ rock! (rock) ♪ i want to rock!

>> raymond: democrats love to portray themselves as the party of love and tolerance, but are they? we just showed you how chuck schumer threatened to sitting supreme court justices, unfold schumer wasn't making a physical threat others in his party have openly threatened violence against the president. >> donald trump is a guy who you understand, my testosterone sometimes makes me feel like i want to punch him. >> i think he needs to go back and punch him in the face. >> raymond: aren't they lovely? joining me now are congressman matt gaetz and lee zeldin, congressman selden does that sound like a party of love and tolerance to you? >> not at all, i am thinking of

steve scalise who almost lost his life. all of the other members republican members of the house and senate who would have lost theirs if not for the great work of the capitol police. i remember the end of june of 2018, maxine waters was speaking to her supporters with a video that went viral and she was using a lot of rhetoric about confronting trump administration officials to confront them in public places and restaurants and movie theaters, guess what? the first week of july 2018, 1 of my campaign volunteers a strong supporter of donald trump was targeted by somebody using the same exact rhetoric and almost killed this campaign volunteer of mine with his car. i can think of stories from 17, 18 fast forward to today, we are not sending the right message, not only the leaders who share this hyperbolic rhetoric but all the followers who then look at it as a call to arms and obviously the nt for thugs. >> i mentioned jackson who was

subjected to this sort of thing for her pro-life stance, have you been subjected to this? >> we have had a number of very frightening death threats, taking shots at me from long range. sometimes a double standard with the fbi unless they are willing to investigate, based on whether or not you are a conservative in my experience wha. i think it's the fact they are losing, donald trump has reshaped the federal judiciary. chuck schumer lost on merritt garland, he lost when he tried to block gorsuch, they lost in spectacular fashion when justice kavanaugh. you see the folks on the left, even more anxious and even more on protectable. >> raymond: democrats have been saying for years that trump is the violent one. >> what mr. trump has done is create an atmosphere that

condones violence, that actually incites people's most emotional and violent feelings. i told the president directly that i thought his language was not just divisive but increasingly dangerous. >> it is the language in other countries, and it is dangerous for the president. >> congressman selden, did any of them condemn what schumer said yesterday? >> not that i know of, that is one of the things that is so frustrating. of all the double standards that we have seen, since donald trump has gotten elected we saw it last year in the house of representatives with all the anti-semitic rhetoric, the double standards of moral equivalencies. we settle our scores at the ballot box, all this inflammatory rhetoric it belongs there. as a consequence of the last presidential election, that's how you end up with neil gorsuch, and brett kavanaugh. let us do our jobs, but certainly as you point out

whether you are in congress or a member of the media, call it accurately if you want to go there. it was a threat, there is no acceptable excuse, no acceptable explanation for it. you can't cut it any other way, it was a threat. >> raymond: is congress matt gaetz was saying, i think he fears losing the supreme court. i want her reaction to the outcome of the coronavirus yesterday "the new york times" reported that on monday the cdc appeared to have removed figures on the agency website counting how many americans had been tested. congressman gates, very quickly. have they told congress why they are doing this? >> yes, because we have democratized access to testing to the state level, we are actually doing a great deal more testing now and keeping that data in real-time on the cdc website is less productive than having states do the testing and the reporting. >> raymond: congressman, thank you both. we will catch up with you soon.

coming up, america's least favorite mayor bill de blasio put his foot in his mouth talking about african-american voters. [ fast-paced drumming ]

[ fast-paced drumming ]

that does all youou expect and way more. that's xfinity xfi. get powerful wifi coverage that leaves no room behind with xfi pods. and now xfi advanced security is free with the xfi gateway, giving you an added layer of network protection, so every device that's connected is protected. that's a $72 a year value. no one else offers this. faster speed, coverage, and free advanced security at an unbeatable value. get the xfi gateway and download the xfi app today.

>> raymond: new york city mayor bill de blasio is proving himself to be a terrible surrogate for bernie sanders. take a look at what he has told msnbc today. >> why do you think he was losing by 40 and 50 points on the african-american voters? >> it stands to reason if people have a certain amount of information, i don't blame them for this, i understand it. the information that i think people received about joe biden was some of his historic connection, which understandably means something to people. >> joe biden's record did not

get a ton of examination. >> raymond: joining me now is horace cooper, project 21 cochair and author of the upcoming book "how trump is making black america great again" also with me is jamila bey, democratic strategist. does de blasio really think black voters are that gullible? they are low information and will civilly go where they are told to go? >> that is their plan for sometime, progressive movement has taken blacks for granted and they assume they can get away with that. the real test is what happens when people start seeing real improvement in their lives? how easy or how hard will it be to attract those kind of voters? >> what are you hearing in reaction to that statement, and are you concerned that black voters are being used to prop up an establishment that quickly forget them? >> they are in a position where to call some people low information voters, that does

not exist. particularly in the states that went through super tuesday, they understand what joe biden's record is, they understand what is joe biden's legacy, the thing that i think is being overlooked is that there are a lot of black voters who i have interviewed who have said we sought biden, bernie sanders in 2016, he didn't do so well done. why would we waste our vote was someone who doesn't even have a chance? >> now that he is serving 110% crazy for $32 trillion and all these various schemes, that scares people. black americans tend to have an overrepresentation of middle-class and working-class people, and they don't like those kind of ideas. what you want to talk about our job creation, opportunities, good for your family. here is what one msnbc contributor said about the african-american vote. >> it is ironic to me that black

voters will be the firewall to protect the moderate conservative wing of the democratic party. will this be the democratic party that assumes as we bank away from the primary, go into the general, will they take advantage of the african-american voters and move and a different direction? and not pay attention? >> raymond: might black voters be unwittingly propping up and supporting bloomberg 2.0? because though they rejected bloomberg utterly, he got none of the black vote, they have supported biden. and bloomberg is really the animated force behind the biden campaign. >> bloomberg is anti-trump, bloomberg is going to throw his money to anyone who he believes, if it gets down to bernie being the candidate bloomberg absolutely is going to go wherever the wind blows. black voters are going to use their votes in ways that make sense to them. of course, you are absolutely right. job creation, what is going to make my family happier, healthier, better? bernie has had a track record of

a mile long and congress, it doesn't have a lot on it but he was there the whole time. >> raymond: horace, before i go i will let you quickly respond. how do you think trump will ultimately fair? what percentage of of the black vote might he get given criminal justice reform, the unemployed t in the black community? >> two things, they will see the biggest gender gap among blacks that we have seen in a generation. and you are going to see a large number of black american support because of black men, blacks are tired of being at the back of the political bus. >> he's right, he is going to get 1% of black women and he is going to get about 8% of black men. >> raymond: i think he will do bigger than that. we will check in. horace and jamila, thank you. coming up, we pay our respects to another fall in 2020 democrat. stay tuned. f brain performance.

memory, focus, accuracy, learning, and concentration. try neuriva for 30 days and see the difference.

... ... ... ...

i i

it is with deep sorrow, i bring you an ingram angle tribute to, another fallen 2020 hopeful. today, princess full of bull left us. >> i'm going to get me a beer. want a beer?

the president likes to call my mom a liar. what are the facts? >> the facts. >> warren's dna test showed last year, she was less than 1-tenth of 1% of native-american. >> i think you called me a liar on national tv? >> i what? >> i think you called me a liar on national t.v. >> who's ready for some. >> slurp it down. >> mmm. if her husband could reach me that beer, i'd toaster. farewell, elizabeth. that's all the time we have tonight. thank you, laura for letting me

sing site in for you. pick up a copy of my book, wil wilder 3. out in paperback march 24. good night from washington d. c. peace. >> after a student super tuesday, it appears the race for president is down to three. >> make no mistake about it. this campaign will send donald trump packing. >> it is our campaign. our movement, which is best positiond to defeat trump. >> some of joe's handlers are further left than bernie. that's pretty scary. >> president trump, fighting for another four years in the white house and wasting no time trying to convince voters to keep him there. >> we must devote everything we have towards victory in november. november 3 to be exact. >> the president, betting