tv The Ingraham Angle FOX News March 19, 2020 7:00pm-8:01pm PDT
7:00 pm
allowed to come about some local cities are taking a much tougher stance. for example, fort lauderdale beach, miami beach, beaches in tampa shutting down altogether and some beaches in alabama are also shutting down, kind of giving spring breakers the boot. >> sean: trace, got it, thank you, trace, let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham. i was almost late again. i hate missing the post. i missed the post a lot but i don't hate missing the post, i'm a radio guide. >> laura: is that what the story is tonight? you hate taking up my time? we can do this next hour together, and if you really feel deprived of airtime, sean hannity, every billboard, every bus. you did a great show. we have some good news. >> sean: why not "the ingraham angle"? >> laura: if we are too nice to each other, people start
7:01 pm
emailing me, why are you guys so nice to each other? they don't get that. like we actually are friends. >> sean: i'm glad you are doing so well. i'm glad of what we do. we tell the truth. you know something, there's been a lot of lies told about us, even saying we have been killing people over the years. i'm not taking their anymore. speed to know. and i noticed that, sean. a bunch of people, you are socially distancing if you go to the grocery or -- and people like sake, keep it up. don't stop, keep going. and when you are looking into a camera, you don't see the people. you are unready, filmic radio, you are the people. >> sean: i'm in the grocery store and people ask me questions talking, elbowing. >> laura: "hannity" come a great show tonight. i am laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle" from
7:02 pm
washington tonight we have been telling you days about a new drug to drastically change the trajectory of the coronavirus and maybe get out of our houses sooner. people are finally listening, plus new fears. this has not been reported, a cardiac complication with the disease. people think it is respiratory but i will talk to an expert on the short and long-term effects of this and the senate's new aid package could put money in your pockets, but is that the best way to steady the economy amongst this outbreak? steve moore and the dangerous of the stemless plan and also ahead, some on the left who seem to be happy about the coronavirus. who are they? they are happy about the effects, may be, not to the people but the claimant. claimant activists are thrilled. i will explain later on in the show. ♪ but first moments ago california governor gavin newsom ordering everyone in the state to
7:05 pm
7:06 pm
coronavirus. more people, and this is really good, or getting tested every day between march 2nd and march 14th, 10.4 million lab test were put in the health care system. 45,000 people have been tested for the cdc. i know always complaining about the cdc but 45,000, 63,000 have been tested by commercial labs, 20,000 and hundreds of thousands of more are coming in the next week. look, the president wanted results. he got them, and he got the one secretary of human health services, alex azar to push for this. i'm -- along with the deal regulatory push. >> >> large testing by leveraging all system. the estimated number of options of supplies, we are standing on 47 sites in 12 states. >> here are some other promising
7:07 pm
news about kovic 19's mortality rate. check this out, using a slew of public and information, the researchers say the probability of dying after covid-19 in wujan was 1.4%. now, we don't want anyone to die, but that is 50% lower has a mortality rate than previously reported in many different outlets. let's hope that number holds over time, especially as more people are tested worldwide. even though asymptomatic. but perhaps the best news of all is about a drug i brought to your attention on monday night. now at first, it seemed to me almost skeptical, almost too good to be true, but the results france, china and beyond have been nothing short of impressi impressive. >> what if it is already a cheap and widely available medication
7:08 pm
that is on the market to treat the virus? according to a new study, there is such a drug. it is called chloroquine. all of these antivirals have been showing promising and early trials, and the antivirus for the treatment, not the vaccine that you are looking at. >> we have to be careful, laura that we don't assume something works on an antidotal report that is not controlled and very specifically, hydroxychloroquine. you have been great about calling this drug. president trump is adamant that we leave no stone unturned, therapies, cures, vaccines for the american people. >> laura: today, "the angle" persistent paid off. the president made this announcement. >> a drug called chloroquine and some people would add to it,
7:09 pm
hydroxychloroquine. it is known as a malaria drug. it has been around for a long time and it is very powerful. it is shown to be encouraging, very, very encouraging with early results. and we are going to be able to make that drug available almost immediately. >> now after this happened, the drug company donated 3 million of the bills on this particular drug to the drug administration. and although the fda has not approved the drug for use as a treatment for covid-19, doctors can still prescribe it. >> that is a drug that the president has directed us to take a closer look at as to whether to expand the use of it today. it could be done. so we can, we want to do that in a setting of clinical trial, large pragmatic trial to gather that information. to answer the question that needs to be answered. >> laura: i have a feeling
7:10 pm
given the fact that most of the countries are locked down right now, the controlled study of 2,000 patients could be organized pretty quickly, given what is at stake here. aunt if you are looking at volunteers, i will volunteer. the fda needs to hop onto this pronto. it looks like they are. and seeing the president snapped his team into action, in the process, harnessing the full power of the government, all of the government, the private sector and our citizens who are doing great act of selfishness during this crisis. it gives all of us hope, and it is a difficult time. as we have done with polio and the measles and so much else, we will find the answers we need. we have beaten diseases in the past, and we will do it again. and that is "the angle." so how beneficial is hydroxychloroquine? doctors are using this treatment and the united states successfully. joining me now dr. william
quote
7:11 pm
gray scum oncologist with lenox hill hospital in new york city. dr. gray's, great to see you tonight but how big of a deal would approving chloroquine for the coronavirus be? >> well, everybody is using it now. we have a surge of coronavirus, 19 patients throughout the metropolitan area in new york. the problem is, these patients are coming in quite sick. and when they get to a very difficult respiratory status, doctors are using hydroxychloroquine with or without a drug -- and that is showing tremendous activity. we have not had a death in the hospital. we are close to 100 patients. but i have talked to many of my colleagues and other hospitals in new york. and they also are using
7:12 pm
hydroxychloroquine come although the supplies are running down. so unique types of supplements to those supplies would be much appreciated. >> laura: dr. grace, and you heard the president today mentioned this, he maybe got a little hesitant with the fda, it's not approved but just to understand, that does not mean doctors can't use the drug and medical settings, as you said, it is already being used, correct? >> in the trenches, we are all using it. especially for death related people. and i doubt it everybody but people who show major compromise. >> laura: and so with this controlled study, we will see both the effects of the hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic, preventative and as a treatment, correct? >> yes. there are people on the west coast looking at it, and people who are virus positive
7:13 pm
but don't show many of the symptoms. they are looking for the clearance of the virus. by this drug. we think it works in two ways. you know the death rate goes up as the age goes up. and what i think is a more mature, more immune response, the more likely you are to have -- which means people with viral pneumonia and died because their lungs fill up with fluid with a new response. in this drug works in editing the edification but that immune response so that you don't get the tremendous amount of information. that is why the drug was used in arthritis. >> laura: apparently, w.h.o., world health organization has organized a study called solidarity. it includes ten countries, argentina, canada, france and a bunch more.
7:14 pm
so they are doing a global study on this, and it's already underway. we should be able to get answers on this pretty quickly. that could be a game changer if what you were seeing. your colleagues are seeing pans out. what they are seeing in china in france is stunning, stunning results with this drug. >> that is true. and i'm hoping what will happen, the data will come down quickly. we will get everybody on hydroxychloroquine, go back to work and put the nation back together again. >> laura: that would be nice. that is what we are trying to get to because america does not want to stay behind closed doors. dr. grace before we go, people talk about the mortality rate and that has been confusing because of the denominator. and people say, we have to know what the real denominator is. explain that. >> we don't have enough test kits, largely because the cdc internalizing to make the test kits part of their program rather than throughout the entire private sector.
7:15 pm
and we are paying a price for that. once we have more tests out and get the public private sectors producing these kits, we will be able to get that denominator down pat. >> laura: that means the mortality rate mortality rate invariably will go down because a lot of those asymptomatic people will test positive, correct? >> exactly, exactly. >> laura: i should have stayed in premed but i got out of that pretty quick. this is so fascinating to me. thank you so much for what you did to explain it. it is complicated but you made it easy to understand. dr. grace, thank you so much. >> thank you for talking to me, laura. have a good night. >> laura: remember the other night when i said there's a lot we don't know about this virus? we are learning something else about this and something quite troubling. the coronavirus associated with heart complications. joining me as dr. michael, cardiologist at st. elizabeth medical center in boston. doctor, how is the coronavirus
7:16 pm
associated with heart problems? what are you seeing with all of the chinese research that is coming out just on that aspect of it? >> well, laura, this is a problem because the initial data from china showed the effects of the coronavirus and the heart is relatively small. so 8% of patients, will see cardiac problems. in lesser cardiac problems observed more frequently. however, that data may be changing coming out of italy and europe. we will hear more alarming results and complications may be more common. and also in the case of the united states, we see late complications on the hearts. this is alarming and this is unknown, we don't have the data. the data is coming but when something is unknown and alarming, we need the data to
7:17 pm
clarify that and alleviate the fears. and that will probably clear to go forward. however, having said that, current complications also are very complex and require complex treatment and complex devices to help support the body while it is fighting the virus. in those devices are in relatively short supply and we need to be prepared to be quickly equipped for them, otherwise, heart, lung machines to support the body. and we don't have many of those that we need to. >> laura: dr. come another point that has been raised is the president's response today, what he specifically mentions this drug and you and i have talked about chloroquine is already being
7:18 pm
>> the president should not be talking about that. i don't care who the president is. this is not a political issue. there is no president that should be out there talking about the intricacy of a medication in a serious situation like this. and with the political leader is saying. >> laura: do you agree with that? the president should not mention any promising drug because heaven knows, we don't need any hope these days. >> i think the promise should be made -- i disagree with that. the promising drug should be quickly tested and checked. there are some minor
7:19 pm
possibilities of complications with hydroxychloroquine but can be monitored. this is a medical drug that should quickly be disseminated and made available. my concern is that hydroxychloroquine supposedly manufactured only by one producer. we need to make it quickly available. like many, many other things that are missing. i was going to bring up some simple things because simple things work. miracle drugs are perfect, but we just need need to, public gatherings, people should observe that is very important. effective equipment needs to be made available. the front lines, we don't have enough. this is just missing again because just overseas there are not enough masks and effective equipment to be made available.
7:20 pm
>> laura: doctor, it is great to see you tonight. and i know there is a lot of government red tape that the president has already cut. there is a lot of hospital red tape because hospitals have gotten this big conglomerate, and a lot of these are very big. and know you have been searching for the hospital red tape to be cut to get the supplies as well. thank you so much, dr. come it is great to see you tonight. >> thank you. >> laura: coming up senate republicans have a fenced -- have something that is very expensive. what can trump do to assure stimulus packages do not backfire? steve more ways in next want to brain better?
7:22 pm
7:24 pm
7:25 pm
proposal will do. these are not ordinary policies. this is no ordinary time. senate republicans want to put cash in the hands of the american people. >> laura: senate majority leader mitch mcconnell proposing a third coronavirus economic aid package. his plan will likely cost more than $1 trillion. it includes sending checks out to every american up to $1200 per person. relief is needed. we all know that because many americans are already filing for unemployment benefits. a looming recession. some say it's already here. the labor department reporting that 280,000 people lost their jobs in the last week. at this rate, we can stand to lose over 1 million jobs. i can't even say that, it is so heartbreaking come over the next month. and experts predicting job losses could total 3.5 million by the summer. we better get going on these antiviral. mcconnell earmarks over
7:26 pm
$350 billion for loans to businesses which he assist is not a bailout. he is carving out $60 billion for the airline industry. do they need taxpayer support, even if it is a loan? is that better? and remember this bill needs to get through a democrat controlled house but they are all working together. so if the last coronavirus bill is any cause, they will fill mcconnell's plan, the house with all sorts of little goodies, goody grab bags, the christmas tree to put their ornaments on and give away to their friends. there is another risk. it is something that endangered economic recovery during the great depression. joining me now, chairman of the calvin coolidge presidential foundation, author of "great society" and steve moore, trump 2016 campaign and author of trump and makes. i told everybody you were going to come back tonight because you were telling us last night and i rudely cut you off that we should avoid doing the things
7:27 pm
that fdr did in the 30s that hurt our recovery. what were you referring to specifically? >> yes, i was not too happy to hear senator mcconnell say no ordinary town because that is a reference of a new deal of franklin roosevelt, which is what we did in the 1930s. and what president roosevelt did as livable and inspiring as it was, to put into the phrase because we had unemployment for 10%, think of that in contrast to nell. and has not come back and a whole decade. imagine if, we pulled ourselves the dow jones will not get back. but that is awfully disconcerting and the bottom line -- >> laura: steve moore, people
7:28 pm
are desperate and looking at these jobless claims. and a month ago with the strongest economy in the world, in decades. and now, here we are. whatever we are calling it, save space distancing and people are out of work, can't go anywhere, can't spend money on anything. what is the best pathway, steve? are they on the right track? >> well, you know, i'm sort of frustrated with this whole stimulus idea. because stimulus has never worked. in fact, "the wall street journal" saturday with the title, stimulus never works. and everybody is right what happen in the 1930s. by the way there is a whole mythology how wonderful the new deal was because the history books and that's what everybody learns. but exactly right it didn't work in the 1930s. we had double digit unemployment throughout franklin roosevelt's presidency. we tried to as you call, laura,
7:29 pm
in 2009 when barack obama was president. remember, laura, shovel ready projects and $30 billion to spring the economy back to life? and by the way, joe biden with a summer of recovery, it never happened. it was the worst recovery from a recession going back to the great depression given by obama's new numbers. the economy would have been better and healed faster had we not spend that money. so my first advice to donald trump, don't do what we did in 2009 under obama because it didn't work. by the way him if he puts in place policies that actually hurt the economy. some of these policies would, you are talking about president joe biden. he's got to have a growth plan, steve forbes and i have talked about the idea of suspending the payroll tax for the rest of the year to give businesses an incentive to hire more workers because it will be a tax cut for
7:30 pm
everyone and the 26 million. >> laura: but what if people don't have any money to spend? >> look, we have programs already for people, for example who have lost their job. unemployment. i had dinner tonight with my seventh and eighth grade stepsons. i asked them, what do you think about the idea of the government giving $1,000 to everybody? the first one said why doesn't anybody work if the government and wouldn't that be inflationary? if ralph seventh and eighth grader figure that out, why can't members of congress? >> laura: i'm trying to get my kids to do basic math facts. >> economics is not complicated. >> laura: but you know the pressure people are under to say, okay, we have to come together. we have to work together, we have to come together, we have to do something. so the people are asking the questions and always vilified. if you ask us a question about a lockdown or write an editorial
7:31 pm
as they did in the journal today. rethinking the coronavirus shutdown, you are vilified. this is wall street editorial journal board and what if this is wrong? >> laura, there were answers to the economic problems that are much more dramatic than the administration is proposing with the senate is proposing. you say you can't say things and you are absolutely correct. an example, what if we cut the tax by half and forget about the surcharge to 20%? what if we talk about that ? for helping the rich, but every economist, including all the way over on the left among the marxist nose if you cut the capital tax rate by half, and international investment will raise the stock market tomorrow. it is just that they don't dare say it. the republicans act like democrats in elections.
7:32 pm
and it's unfortunate. there are many more growth steps that we could take, but we have to be a little bit braver than we are currently being. the republican party is almost indistinguishable, unfortunately from the democratic party. and he had a completely different vision, let me say. >> laura: let see. >> okay, look, i think this is a dangerous situation. i heard a report what they are doing in california, basically locking down the whole state telling people they can't leave their homes without government permission. this is a very dangerous call almost a situation we are in right now. i happen to agree with "the wall street journal" editorial. if this goes on where we have people locked down they can't go to work, you were talking about economic damage that would be in the trillions of dollars. we have to ask this question, is it worth trillions of dollars of losses? think of human suffering, the loss of savings, is that worth the it to deal with? it is a question worth asking
7:33 pm
because i'm starting to think maybe we should get people back to work as fast as we can. >> laura: it is a question of, if you are locked down for months and you can't go anywhere, you can't talk to anybody. you can't really see anyone close up. you can't -- i mean come a friend of mine said that is not america. if we are here in two months and we can't leave our homes, that is not really america. and so, people are beginning to already ask that question and we haven't even got through a week of this so imagine three weeks or four weeks or five weeks. i think it is good to ask questions and do smart things and do common sense. guys to see you tonight, good to see you tonight, thanks very much. the coronavirus is making everyone miserable except climate activists are happy about one part of it. we will tell you why before a rational environmentalist response. don't go away shield got a chip. >> man: we drove to safelite autoglass for a same-day repair. >> woman: and with our insurance, it was no cost.
7:34 pm
7:38 pm
♪ >> laura: shutting down entire industries and then forcing people to stay behind closed doors is terrible for the economy, for the mental well-being and standard of living. that must be why activists are celebrating. blessed cheerleaders at cnn. there is an unlikely beneficiary of coronavirus, the planet. u.s. sa said could we be saving lives and parts of the world because of reduced pollution? and here is what the architect of human paris used to say, one
7:39 pm
thing that i think is positive, if we sustained several months of travel, we may realize we don't have to travel as much. can this have actual behavioral change impacts? maybe, and let us hope you're joining me now, mike shellenberger president of environmental progress. my, admissions are down, but people are getting pretty miserable and economies are in referral so is this their vision of a healthy society looks like? >> unfortunately for antihuman and environmental brothers and sisters, this is a model to teach how to live. it is not a model most people want to live. and the thing we forget, carbon emissions peaked in the united states over a decade and a half ago. they have declined by 35% when you look at the emissions from the electricity production.
7:40 pm
thanks to the fracking and gas revolution. if you are looking for a model for how to deal with claimant change, and improve the environment, you wanted a lot of growth and prosperity. and that brings us energy. >> laura: over at cnn tonight, well, she wanted to remind us of the silver lining. >> if there is a silver lining to this crisis commit is visible in the sky above china. the dramatic slow down in manufacturing and driving has caused a reduction in carbon emissions. we have seen these massive satellite images that shows the improvement in china's air quality. >> laura: cnn though, pbs on a monday but you get the point. they are showing a lot of these satellite images and it is italy before and after. i think of italy cometh of people before and after the coronavirus, but again, this is some of the most extreme elements of the environmental lobbyist. i'm a conservationist, it was
7:41 pm
outdoors with my kids today and i love the outdoors. i hate people that literate, but they actually seem to be happier the less we are doing. the less we are outdoing travel and seeing the world. they don't want us to see the world. >> yeah, i think that is really sad. i think what you see with a lot of people celebrating this moment. and i seen it on line, the virus is eliminating the human cancer on the earth. i think it is minority dark view. i think the truth is, even on the growth and lifting people out of poverty is the most important way to reduce air pollution, and negative impacts on the national environment. the truth is air pollution has been in decline in the united states since the late 1960s. carbon emissions, obviously over a decade and a half ago, carbon emissions peaked in the 70s. the good news, the switch to
7:42 pm
national gap -- natural gas mains unlikely temperatures will be very high. it will probably peek under 50 degrees in temperatures to increase since preindustrial time. so i think this is a current situation a terrible example of what it means to protect the environment. >> laura: whoever used to work for obama, a white house official said that the virus and climate change were somehow linked. watch. >> there is one more significant to reduce the spread of animals to humans and that his combat climate change. climate change is driving this problem. climate change has a lot, a lot, a lot of bad effects when we don't think about very often is an effect of the driver of the epidemics. but certainly it is making this risk go up as a plan they. >> laura: have you heard anything about that? the wet markets and eating bats
7:43 pm
or other animals or whatever the heck they did to have this virus be a global problem with climate change? i'm not following that. >> there is always an argument to be made that some of these epidemics in warmer temperatures, but the fact of the matter is, no one thinks climate change because 1918 flu that killed 1,500,000,000 people. i haven't heard many people claiming but the way you said it is exactly right. who would have thought that the west nile virus in china would be a major source of global chaos of economic challenges that we will be having mass deaths. and that is the reality and warning against chinese markets. the markets where the animals are on top of each other. it is very unsanitary. we have been worrying about those for two decades now. one thing that will come out of this, there ought to be efforts internationally to make sure that countries get rid of those markets which are breeding grounds for dangerous viruses
7:44 pm
like these and helped countries move towards modern meat production and consumption. >> laura: thank you so much, mike, great to see you tonight. coming up a prisoner at reichert island has a contract of the coronavirus. wait until you see bill de blasio responded to that one. but more importantly what about inmates running free? we will tell you next.
7:46 pm
7:47 pm
yes. this moving thing never gets any easier. well, xfinity makes moving super easy. i can transfer my internet and tv service in about a minute. wow, that is easy. almost as easy as having those guys help you move. we are those guys. that's you? the truck adds 10 pounds. in the arms. ok. -yep. transfer your service online in a few easy steps. now that's simple, easy, awesome. xfinity makes moving easy with two-hour appointment windows, even on nights and weekends. go to xfinity.com/moving to get started.
7:48 pm
>> laura: this is a fox news alert, gavin newsom ordering everyone in the state to stay at home during the coronavirus outbreak. foxes jeff paul from the west coast newsroom with all the details, joe. >> laura this is a major setback for california to try to stop the spread of the coronavirus. it is a decision that will impact the lives of 40 million
7:49 pm
people who to stay home. the mandate residents to remain in their homes and stop social interaction. governor gavin newsom stating one of the biggest concerns at the moment, hospitals becoming overrun with the sick. the state projects more than 25 million people in california will be infected with the coronavirus over an eight week period. in a letter to president trump, gavin newsom said employment of the nursery hospital to the port of los angeles to help those who might get sick. >> this state as large as ours is many parts. but at the end of the day we are one body. as a mutuality and a recognition of our interdependence that requires of this moment that we direct a state wide order to people to stay at home. that directive goes into force and effect this evening, and we are confident, we are confident that the people of the state of california will abide by it and
7:50 pm
do the right thing. and may be at this moment they will step up. >> a service will operate and include things like grocery stores, media outlet, gas stations, banks, hardware stores, home repair professionals and laundromats. restaurants can stay open if they prepare food for delivery or carry out, but the big push is for people to stay away from each other and will he be out if necessary, laura. >> laura: jeff, wow, 25 million, he said will be infected. and i asked dr. fauci and the report is half of americans get infected and he kind of pooh-poohed that. that is not right. and so we are getting all sorts of projections here and making a lot of assumptions based on these projections. jeff, this is well news. thank you so much for this tonight. i appreciated. >> you bet. >> laura: new york city has confirmed cases of coronavirus which includes an intimate at rikers island.
7:51 pm
so of course, mayor de blasio is using it as an excuse to do what, to release dozens of prisoners. >> the cases are being reviewed by the nypd and the mayor's office of criminal justice and as they reach agreement on individual cases, we start the process to release them. 40 inmates, 40 inmates have been put on a list. we are awaiting signoff depending on the case from the relevant district attorney and or the state of new york. >> laura: now, i do want to note that four correctional officers have tested positive for the coronavirus. joining me now is the dean and president of the correction office, elias, great to see you tonight. should we be letting these inmates out? right now it is only 40 so what is wrong with that? >> absolutely not. you cannot solve a public health crisis by creating a public
7:52 pm
safety crisis. i don't know who would think that is a good idea. the best way to solve a public health crisis in the jails is by giving directional supplies and the tools and the things that we need to actually address this. this is what we have been fighting for and asking city hall and asking the mayor to give us. we need supplies. we need gloves. we need masks, we need things that we can use to actually keep the health problem inside of the jail and not have people running around the streets creating public safety issue. they are in jail for a reason. >> laura: can you tell us anything about the level of supplies that you have and your officers have at rikers island? >> currently what we have is not adequate. if we should have an epidemic and if this thing should break outcome of the supplies that we have won't last. so we have been asking like so many other humans in the city,
7:53 pm
we need more masks. we have been asking for masks like this particular mask which is a mask, we have the letter in-95 but those are only good for a few hours. and this one has a five year shelf life and a filter to be replaced, cleaned, reused. but the reality is, what we have is not sufficient. it is not enough. but we have to fight just to end visits and stop the outside from coming in. but laura, who would think that you can solve a public health problem by putting people back in the streets? >> laura: elias, this is happening not just in rikers island though. there is a push to use the coronavirus to not make arrests, basically decriminalize criminal activity. because it is just too much and too much stress on the system. there is a push to not deport
7:54 pm
criminal aliens in the united states. in some quarters. activist groups, they know we have to stop all deportations and all of our people should be focused on the coronavirus. i mean -- >> currently, there is no need to. the inmate population in new york city is lower than it has been in decades. we have approximately 5400 inmates in our custody. and we have the ability right now to change the inmate to office ratio. we don't have to have one officer for every 50 inmate like we have right now. we have the ability to have 20 inmates for everyone officer, 30 inmates for every two officers. there was no need to release anybody. we don't have current -- they have already done their relief. >> laura: so just people know and i want to put this on the screen, it is mostly murderers,, drug dealers and people convicted of grand larceny. so those are the majority of the folks at rikers island that
7:55 pm
7:59 pm
8:00 pm
in dealing with impeachment and the congress was dealing with their impeachment mania -- think about bath just for a moment, get your head wrapped around that. think about the consequences of having the wrong priorities. shannon bream in the fox news at 19 take it all from here. >> shannon: just a short time ago the democratic governor gavin newsom issued a statewide order for all californians with some exceptions to stay home. what exactly does that mean and how are they going to enforce it to? what is the potential economic impact? senate majority leader mitch mcconnell unveiling the stimulus bill promising $1200 cash to everyone making up to $75,000 a year. democrats claim there is little in it for workers and there are rising partisan concerns about spending trillions of tax dollars. the president telling food and drug to cut all the red tape it can in hopes of speeding up
146 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on