>> run. >> sean: ouch. you can go to hannity.com. live free or die, america and the world on the brink. live free, or america dies. laura, take it away. >> sean:>> laura: sean, great ss always. we don't stand up for a basic civil liberties, even in difficult times. we will lose them forever. i think more people are talking about that. >> sean: yeah, i'm worried about that. fantastic show, we will see you tomorrow. >> laura: high, i'm laura ingraham. how soon will we have the names of the incoming trump administration. congressman devin nunes and "the wall street journal"'s kim have answers. in nursing homes are basically accounting for a or overwhelming majority of cova death.

why are they ignoring that reality? we have a two-part expose later in the hour. if you needed any more evidence that democrats are playing politics with this pandemic, look no further than pelosi's new progressive stimulus bill. it tells us how the left is using fear to push their agenda. but first, what would joe do? that's the focus of tonight's angle. like i rarely seen endangered bird on its way to extinction, joe biden was spotted early this morning on abc's "good morning america." so how would joe lead america through the culvert crisis? >> i would tell the governors to listen to the scientist. a listen to what the facts are. look at, this is -- this president has to focus on what's going on here. i'm getting really frustrated with th the whole notion that we

can just open. >> laura: what? subject, verb, direct objects. what do they want to keep interviews short and campaigning for joe virtual? the poor guy. but what biden seems to be saying, if you can unpack it, is that he would farm out critical decision-making to others like dr. fauci and other unnamed food scientist. but while the idea may be appealing, to people like george stephanopoulos and others in the media, and the end it would mean that americans would be poor and less free. no work and less it's improved by experts. no worship services, no ball games, no concerts, no travel to see her family or friends. not at least until we have a vaccine. oh wait, vaccines as we heard

the other day. as in plural. since the virus is mutating. except some bad news, your kids are out of luck as well. because the vaccine wouldn't even be ready by september. >> the idea of having treatments available, or a vaccine to facilitate the reentry of students into the fall term, would be something that it would be a bit of a bridge too far. >> laura: parents across america let out a collective gasp. how is that based in science? with all due respect, no one elected him to anything. there are devastating consequences of keeping children away from -- i think we've been to get about this for five weeks. do the experts in medicine, if they have to work they can't

afford tutors or nannies. >> i don't have a good explanation or solution to the problem of what would happen when you close schools. it could have powerful circumstances. >> laura: i'm glad he was candid, but of course it's a case. he hasn't thought that through. the ripple effects. that's not his job. >> i'm a scientist, a physician, and a public health official. i don't give advice about economic things. i don't give advice about anything other than public health. >> laura: it now dr. fauci wanted to clarify saying that a vaccine is not necessarily needed to open schools, but still. we all know that the only experts that would inform biden are experts approved by the left-wing media. for instance, stanford phds who studied the virus and criticize the shutdown, they are just ignored. they are not experts at all.

forget the phd. the virus we know is killing americans we love. but it's far less deadly than originally thought. >> this is a virus that induces an immunity response. and people recover. the overwhelming majority recover from this virus. >> laura: keep that in perspective. i'm glad dr. fauci reminded of us of that today. we have known that new york, new jersey, accounted for a large percentage of a 45 of all deaths. and that's new york, likely ceded the nation with the virus. we know that under governor cuomo's leadership, senior citizens died. ended up infecting others. but now, new york expects the rest of america to fork over billions to bail it out as it stays down indefinitely. it shutdowns indefinitely.

how is that going to work? no i dare you to read andrew cuomo's 51 page plan to supposedly go forward. post covert. well, i will just give you a synopsis. mike bloomberg will be in charge of tracking and training thousands of contracts. only 3 out of 200 free foods meet requirements to reopen. bill gates and a partner in reimagining education. most of new york isn't opening any time in near future. and if you don't open, where is that tax coming from? to keep schools and services and at least doing something online. providing services as they are needed. where's the money coming from? well, wait for it. it's coming from you. the taxpayers of course. this is about remaking america under the veil of a virus. it's a naked power grab in the middle of a pandemic.

and it's disgusting. thank goodness president trump decided to let states chart their own course toward reopening. because now you can kind of see for yourself what life will be like under a biden administration paid what would joe do? well, he'd do pretty much what new york has done. or california has done. lockdown until the experts set you free. lockdown and told maybe bill gates gives his vaccine. all her health care decisions will be informed by the w.h.o. and thus, dictated by china. the new normal, under democrat role, will be socialism for all. crumbs for the masses. as for the elites who helped along the way, help to this whole situation unfold, they are not going to change at all. they and still fear to overcome the common sense. and that's what they have been doing all along. house democrats unveiled their

own plan to remake america today. a3000000000000 dollar grab bag which we will expose later. it includes everything from aid for marijuana dispensaries. it now keep all of this in mind as joe biden stumbles through carefully curated interviews. given his obvious limitations, he will be nothing more than a figurehead president. we have said this before. he will be shuffled from from event to event with an emphasis on ceremonial duties. this weekend we are getting mixed reviews. according to a poll, and biden's favorable rating among women slid since april. and then there is this, only 50 50/50 4% want the party to keep biden on the ticket. that's a terrible sign for the democrats in november. and perhaps why trump is still leading, even with all this

economic turmoil. the democrats will keep this panic parade going through at least the election. what else do they have? but fear itself. meanwhile, i envision a lot of banners with slogans such as this. trump 2020. we trust you. freedom, not to shutdowns. or maybe yes to america, no thanks to the new normal. and that's the angle. testing, testing, testing. that's not necessarily the best way out of this, is it? for example, washington went ballistic when the head of the national guard tested positive for covert. two subsequent tests, including one today, i gave negative results. so why is this happening? joining me now is my medicine cabinet, dr. steven smith.

and dr. cardiologist. we have a lot of issues to get through. we will start with you. does this reveal, and part, just little anecdotes of the folly of this obsession with testing? >> i think it's just the tip of the iceberg. imagine that you go to work and you test positive. you feel fine. you have no symptoms whatsoever. and your employer says go away, you can't come back until you have tested. you have to self quarantine without pay. how do you appeal to that? what about the false negatives and the false positives? we really don't know. and a lot of it has to do, in some cases, with all the test is administered. do you insert that swab as president trump discussed all the way into the cranium. there are so many issues with testing. that it's clearly not a metric. the only testing we should do,

at this point, it's strange testing. trying to follow the various constraints and get a sense of where things are headed. >> laura: all right, i want to move on to what dr. fauci talked about today. i remember, when he was really excited about this new gilead drug. well, he walked it back little bit. watch. >> let me take a moment to describe the placebo-controlled randomized trial. we must remember, it was only a modest result. showing that the drug made a 31% faster time to recover. he hoped to build on this modest success with combinations of drugs and better drugs. >> dr. smith, reining in his previous enthusiasm for this drug? >> it goes down that way. it does sound like a qualification. i'm not sure exactly what he

said before about the room an to randomized study. i think it was compassionate about the other study that was more about controls, criticizing controls. not criticizing other studies. not being strange about the analysis. depending on what drug was being tested. >> laura: dr. smith, i want to get back to really quickly on what we are seeing going forward on this hydroxychloroquine. because again, we don't have to play it, but he said there is no evidence, very confidently, no evidence that hydroxychloroquine has much of a benefit in patience. and we are hearing about nurses who were sent home in boston tonight who were given basically zinc and pepsi. and are not able to get dr. corcoran. and they want to have hydroxychloroquine because it's not been recommended by their

primary care physicians. thoughts? >> it doesn't make sense. there is certainly no... zinc does anything. so the why are they giving those two drugs? there is plenty of data from other countries showing that this combination works. the biggest difference in the trial show the increased dose of hydroxychloroquine. that's one of the biggest differences. the other one is that the studies have seen in the u.s. the hydroxychloroquine is just a group, it's much sicker than the other groups. it's really hard to compare apples to oranges, and that's what they are doing. >> laura: i get that. it may need to be the higher dose, especially for patience of particular weight. it has to be given earlier. that's what we have gotten from

your analysis throughout this period dr. smith, thank you on that. in the hours after, the city of l.a. announce this. >> we are not going to fully reopen in los angeles, or any place in america, without any help orders. i know it's going to be even longer than three months. we are goin not going to go baco normalcy until there is a medicine or a vaccine that allows that. >> laura: dr. fauci said there's not likely any this fall either. so i guess we're just not going to open california. >> flabbergasted. so much of what is been suggested here is not backed by actual data. it's a lot down. ed never had a neat real good data to support it. the understanding always for the lockdown was that it would blunt and therefore not overwhelm the health care system at one time. it was never going to be without risk. but to allow people like

dr. fauci to make these kinds of decisions as to allow, to determine whether or not we should invade normandy. it's not based in science. at least not science and anything but the 15th century. >> laura: yeah, well, social distancing, whether schools should be closed. dr. smith, if schools continued to be closed, it doesn't seem to be a lot of evidence that kids are super spreaders, at least of this virus. >> also, what's the end game? what are you going to wait for? there is one plus to testing. we have tested over 500 people. we have only had three positive that's reassuring. less than 35th of a percent. that's very reassuring when they know they are not positive. that gives them confidence

moving forward. that's where testing has its strength. and the number of negatives. the new tests are not invasive. which means just the interior part of the tip of your nose. and we are using those to great success. people are amendable to those. they are in the benefit to match that enormous comfort level, and norma's knowledge on how it's spreading. >> laura: writes, and it's spreading an old folks homes. and it's not as lethal as originally thought. >> the first epidemic i know of where we didn't chase the contact of the injected people. this is what we do with every infectious disease. we chased him a context. that's what we should be going after. i don't know why -- >> laura: all right. thank you so much. great to see both of you tonight. joining me now -- dr. carson.

i want to go back to this during the senate hearing today. where lawmakers did press dr. fauci on the consequences of keeping schools close. watch. >> you think we are going to have a national strategy and nobody's going to go to school, it's kind of ridiculous. >> has there been any sort of kind of risk-benefit ratio for the child? particular risk for missing out on the year of education? particularly those from rich backgrounds. >> you have to have the consequence is of having children out of school. i don't have an easy answer. i just don't. >> laura: is that a little troubling that this is where we are. as a member of the task force, what do you think needs to happen now? parents across the country are freaking out. that their kids are not going to go back to school next fall. >> you know, one of the reasons

we have a president is so that they can weigh all these different opinions that come from all kinds of different directions. and the president is doing a good job of that. i expect people in the scientific arena to always be dotting all the eyes and crossing all the t's. that's the reason probably that they are not the ones who make all the decisions. you have to have somebody who can integrate all these things. and obviously, one size does not fit all. that is so important. and this is the land of the free. maybe sometimes people forget that. but there is a reason that america rose from nowhere to the pinnacle of the world. in record time. it's because we have people who were free to use their gifts, their innovation, their entrepreneurship. and we had people who were

brave. people who were willing to take risk. unfortunately, there is no risk free atmosphere. and we have to weigh these things. you know, when you look at the hotlines for mental illness, they skyrocket in april. and you look at all the negative consequences that come from us equestrian people. we have to begin to think about those things as well. and weigh these things. it doesn't mean that we don't have to be careful. we have learned a lot of things. we have learned about hand washing, we have learned about social distancing, we have learned to be careful about the things that we touch. social distancing, all these things are important. and if we use them intelligently, we can integrate people back into the workforce. this country was built on work. it wasn't built on sitting around and waiting for the government to do everything for you. >> laura: are you concerned that what you're saying in states especially, that have

much -- very little covert. i mean, proportionally. very small. especially compared to the horrific flu season we had which was one of the worst we've seen in the last 40 years. although cdc can get their numbers straight on that. are you worried that this response by some states and local officials is appearing to be more politically-based than medically based? >> well, either that or it's a great coincidence. i'm not sure. i would love it if all the governors and all the local officials would simply say let's sit down and look at the evidence. remember for instance in georgia there was all this criticism a few weeks ago because governor kemp said he was going to open things up. well, he did open things up. have we had a tremendous spike their question mike if we have

come i haven't heard about it. >> laura: no, we haven't. >> we need to be willing to really sit down and objectively look at the data and look at the data on both sides. what is the damage from contracting the virus, what is the damage from destroying the economy. look at the long-term implications of that. and i think you will come out on the right side if you are willing to do that. >> "the washington post" headline, i just tweeted it. a few moments ago. 100,000 businesses are set to close. more than a hundred thousand small businesses have closed forever as the nation's pandemic pole escalates. that's a lot of human lives, don't you think? >> absolutely. and every day that we keep things shuttered, more businesses will close. now there is a good thing. >> laura: 20 seconds. >> a lot of the brush has burned

off. a new businesses will spring up because of the infrastructure, it still there. >> thanks for joining us, russia wanted trump to win. not quite. we will set the record straight.

♪ >> laura: joe biden doing his best today on "good morning america." to dodge questions about the fbi's hit job on mike flynn. he deflected, he dodged, and he might have done it if it weren't for this follow-up. >> i know nothing about those moves to investigate michael flynn. >> but you were reported to be in a meeting in 2017 where you and the president were briefed on the fbi's plan to question michael flynn? >> i thought you asked whether or not i had anything to do with him being prosecuted. i'm sorry.

>> okay. >> i was aware that there was an investigation. but that's all i know about it. >> laura: was he just caught off guard, or does forgetful joe no more than he lets on? fox news contributor congressm congressman, fox reported earlier that the doj will not release the names of the obama officials involved in the unmasking of flynn. so who can, and when might we learn those names ffr? >> well, we have known from the beginning that the only crime that we knew what was was the crime of leaking the contents of a call that clearly must've been an intelligence product of some kind. that was the only crime we knew about, and still to this day it's a crime that has not been investigated. the one reason that i am hopeful, i have no evidence of this that perhaps the doj is

finally running an investigation and if that's true, there would be a reason not to put those names out. i'm only speculating. i must tell you. >> laura: kim, here's what one of jim comey's good pal said about the flynn gaze. >> information that has been released relates to general flynn, of course, it does not in any sense establish that there was any great misconduct on the part of the justice department or the fbi. much less president obama. >> laura: kim, i'm pretty sure this is encouraged in the fbi handbook? >> yeah, i mean, anybody who actually read the doj's filing last week, and presumably this person did not, there is no way you could walk away and believe the fbi behavior was anything less than reprehensible. there is a couple of pages devoted just to jim comey. about how he completely ignored

doj leadership and acted, yet again, and i'm suppor insubordi. which everyone was advising him to do. so you know, yes, entrapment, no. it's deftly not a good look for the fbi. i think we stove a lot more we are going to learn about that fbi behavior as we go forward. >> laura: now congressman, we need to get to this. remember crowd to strike a question mark the company that the dnc hired to figure out how their emails were hacked. well, here's what their ceo sean henry told the house until a to committee about. as it relates to the dnc, we have indicators that data was expedited. we do on my congressman of utah pressed him on the point.

what about the emails that everybody is so, so knowledgeable of? were there also indicators that they were prepared, but evidence that they actually were? henry then responded there is not evidence that they were actually expo treated. now, as he him admitting this is just completely bogus? i found that to be stunning, frankly. >> you have two different issues here. one, the democrats hired crowd strike. they refused to let the fbi go in and look at the server to do a proper evaluation. so that evidence is likely lost forever. but on the other side of things, remember, this is not been a big secret. we have been advising anyone who would listen that if you are a government agency, the department of defense, anybody who works for the department of defense, anybody that has personnel records, any political

party, congress, russia, china, north korea, iran, every single day they are trying to get in and break into these official records. so, you know, i don't think it's rocket science to think that several countries could be breaking into government agencies at all hours of the day. and so i think it is concerning that the democrats did not allow the fbi to go in and get their server. so we will never know the truth. >> laura: kim, kamala harris, perhaps joe biden's running mate if she has her preference, she spoke out about what he did. watch. >> when you have an attorney general in bar who allows michael flynn to withdraw his plea, that's not justice. this man doesn't understand what

it means to do justice. at he should resign. >> laura: he should resign. that's the refrain you are hearing from all these long time democrat doj officials as well. what does that tell you about the state of play on the left? >> well, by the way, here is your sign. whenever you hear one of these officials say that this was built bar's decision, without referencing the fact that he put a u.s. attorney in charge of ths review to look at this, a guy who was a long time fbi agent himself, a career prosecutor for ten years. who did an independent review and made this recommendation to bill barr. you know that they are trying to pin this on a politically it. they are just not aware of the of listening to you. >> laura: yeah, i mean, that's just fact number one. it wasn't decided by barr.

he farmed it out to a career prosecutor who did nick the decision. and anybody who read the document actually knows that was completely fine. it made perfect sense. congressman, great to see both of you. >> laura: is protecting nursing homes important? we have the data, plus the incomprehensible reason that pennsylvania has democrat governor is keeping one of his counties from the opening. that's next.

>> laura: of course you know now about the appalling decision to force nursing homes to admit cocovid positive patience. the highest toll of any state. but new york is on the loan and experiencexperiencing the trage. nursing home deaths are the majority of the dust. that includes massachusetts where there have been over 3,000 nursing home deaths. in in new hampshire and rhode island, and in minnesota over 82% were among nursing home residents. joining me now, a man who went through the numbers and painstaking fashion. from the committee to unleash prosperity. boy, do we need prosperity big

time now. it seems like they are isn't enough attention paid to these stats. when we talk about how to open the country again and protect those who need to protect the most. what are we missing here? >> well, laura, i think that we failed the most basic test of our response to this virus which was how are you going to protect the most vulnerable, the most at risk. we knew that there was a steep age risk with this virus. we saw it in china, reside in europe. it was very clear but the oldest and sickest were most as del mike at risk. we focused in on where the problem was in europe. remember about half of all of the cova deaths in europe are in nursing homes. long-term care facilities of different types. that we typically call nursing homes in this country. and we didn't do that, we did the opposite. in fact, it wasn't just them.

the same thing happened in pennsylvania. they required nursing homes to take positive patience, and many circumstances, allowed sick people to be moved to hospitals. in some cases, even to empty hospitals. there are some stories of empty hospital say no, no, we have to wait for the wave of other patients. we have to keep our hospitals empty. and so there were some really major missteps. the one thing you didn't mention there in the introduction is pennsylvania. they are more than two-thirds of all their deaths in the state of pennsylvania are in the nursing home. and that's not a small number because that's the state with a lot of deaths. they have over 2500 deaths. more than two-thirds of their cova deaths in pennsylvania. and he's sane oh, we can't open the state where the only outbreak is in the nursing home. he saying the county has the same walked on locked on. >> laura: this is what the cdc director said about what to do with the provo riveter to tell

marco mike to the home doxxed. >> the cdc will be doing that in partnership with the state and local territorial health departments. we get in front of this and do comprehensive surveillance of everybody in the nursing homes. >> laura: phil, is that reassuring? >> well, i'm glad somebody's finally doing it. the states were supposed to be doing a spirit obviously, did a very poor poor job of tracking. where are you tracking this nursing home disaster in the state? well, ask your governor. the trump administration is stepping up for the states failed. they put in a final rule last week they are going to require weekly reporting of dots. and with multiple instances of flu-like illness as well, even if there hasn't been tests yet. there's going to be public data

submitted that is going to be posted. there were also be notification requirements for families where you will know if you have a family member in a facility with an outbreak. so the government is really stepping up here. they probably should've done it even sooner. but clearly, filling the void where the states have failed. >> laura: thank you so much. this should inform us going forward with the overall response to covid. given where we know where it takes place. southwestern pennsylvania is preparing to reopen. welcome everywhere except beaver county. they are stuck in lockdown even though nearly all the cases came from the single nursing home. daniel camp is the commissioner of beaver county. he joins me now. why is the state punishing an entire county instead of focusing on the most vulnerable here? >> absolutely come out thank you for having me tonight. when he came last week to announce, he put it on the

economic island. we don't understand his decisions. it's unwarranted and irrational. we are having a large issue with that. our residents won't become prisoners within our county lines. when these other counties open up outside of beaver county we want to go to other counties to travel. 70% of our cases are at this one facility. 90% of the deaths is at this facility. the department of health failed the residence there, and filled the loved ones who lost their loved ones. >> laura: a lot of business owners can't open i beaver coun. at the state is allowing the county's first medical marijuana dispensary to open. this is just crazy town stuff. now, commissioner, is this really what your constituents, many of whom were out of work, are really desperately desiring?

pot without jobs? is that what they want? >> absolutely not. we want to get back to work. the small businesses that build our community here in beaver county, they built it for years. i am a product of the small business. if we were here today, we would be failing. governor telling them stay on the on appointment line. there are people who have it, received unemployment checks since march. all year, putting money into these businesses. that's a failed system as well. >> laura: commissioner, thank you for fighting. thank you for raising this iss issue. every county in the country matters. and every person, of course who has lost his or her life during this process, they matter. but we have a lot of covid survivors and a lot of people who never, thankfully, i got the virus. they also need to survive. they also need to thrive.

and this has got to be challenging. it's got be challenged. i hope it doesn't come to you for that. but commissioner, thank so much. >> thank you. >> laura: all right, coming coming up house democrats are unveiling $3 trillion of wishlist radical leftist policies. we will help us expose some of the worst of the worst i in the spell. next.

our retirement plan with voya gives us confidence. yeah, they help us with achievable steps along the way... ...so we can spend a bit now, knowing we're prepared for the future. surprise! we renovated the guest room, so you can live with us. oooh, well... i'm good at my condo. oh. i love her condo. nana throws the best parties. well planned,

well invested, well protected. voya. be confident to and through retirement. now through may 17, enjoy free access to the best shows and movies from favorites like hbo, showtime, starz and for the first time ever, hulu and peacock! watch the show starring that guy you saw in that other thing... you know the one. or the series this kid on reddit says is "legit," punch emoji, explosion emoji. even the one with the actor people say looks just like your boss. and maybe sounds like him too. put your phones down. everyone's got a show to recommend. watch the best for free. just say "watchathon" into your

voice remote, or download the xfinity stream app.

♪ >> the bank has told us to think big. we are doing what's necessary to deal with the coronavirus and make sure we can get the country back to work. >> laura: that's just a lie. much to the democrats plan, it's not even about you, it's about

them and their radical agenda. this is what pelosi and her friends think will actually help get your kids back to school. immediately releasing certain prisoners, giving marijuana businesses an alternative to dealing in cash, and the blue state tax cut for her million millionaire friends in california and new york. at this is pandemic politics at its worst. joining me now is a conservative vote of commentator. earlier today, you said that they are expert practitioners in fear and that they are relying on the vulnerability, this vulnerability that they create to enact their agenda. injecting fear and panic to push this multitrillion dollar disaster. explain. >> when you look at the grab bag of socialist proposals, there

are actually a pretty hard sell. because they don't contort with experience or reason. and the democrats kind of deep down know that. and so what they rely on is the politics of fear. they are expert practitioners of the politics of fear. why? because if you thing about fear, it is fear of the unknown. it causes you to suspend your reason and do things that you wouldn't otherwise do. almost a century ago, fdr, a democrat, warned us about fear. he said we don't like the only thing to fear is fear itself. fear is un-american. it can paralyze you, it can become the problem itself. but not for democrats today. fear is now an opportunity. if you look at the coronavirus, it's only delayed it. a generation ago they were talking about the ozone layer at dissipating, the earth running out of food, next it was climate. they are trying to introduce at hysteria because in the hysteria, they want people to act in ways that they would never act if they give something

consideration. >> laura: yeah, they are now comparing people who want americans to go back to school and work to climate deniers or anti-vaccines. so instead of actually taking on the argument, can kids really spread the virus, what are the other consequences of not being in school? they don't want to engage in that debate. see, you are just a denier. you are antiscience. >> yeah, one of aoc's had said recently a very revealing thing. he said look at these -- for us it's all about change in the economy. he is saying that there is a chance to do things by invoking climate. i mean, he couldn't care less whether the earth was getting hotter or colder. he doesn't know, he doesn't care. but it is a pretext for doing things he couldn't otherwise do. the same thing here, a bunch of these pelosi proposals have

nothing to do with fighting the health crisis. they have nothing to do with jobs. they are basically a way to introduce proposals that they have been trying to push for a long time. but that meant the resistance of common reason. and political good sense. and now they are hoping to shut them by because they think we are all too scared to do otherwise. >> laura: yeah, too scared or too stupid. now i have to get your take on this. abc news was the only morning show not to play it a clip of tara reade's interview last friday. he didn't ask a single question about read until the end. let's just say, he let it completely off the hook. >> watch. >> on these allegations, i know you deny them. but you also said women should be believed. what do you say to americans who believe tara reade and won't vote for you because of that? >> i think women should be believed. that they should have an opportunity to have their case -- forthright, what their cases. that is their responsibility of

responsible journalist to go out and investigate those. >> laura: your thoughts on the deflection by biden? that's pretty much it. with the to bed. >> well, i mean, first of all, the statement would be inconsistent even if all that biden meant was that it's a he said, she said. what's interesting here is that tara reade told a number of people, not only relatives, but neighbors and so on that this happened to her. and she told them a long time ago. and so there is not necessarily corroborating evidence to what biden did, but there is corroborating evidence that she felt this way before. at this is not just something that she has come up with now. and that's the part that is being quickly glossed over. >> laura: thank you for your insights on the grab bag of progressive goodies. great to see you. and coming up, the biden states are off and running. the latest video entry.

oh, goody. guys, figuring out who counts in the 2020 census isn't complicated. everyone living in your home on april 1st counts. my aunt and uncle who live with us, count. my best friend who sleeps over every friday night, doesn't count. (laughs) my new baby sister, she counts. my mom's best friend, who's been living with us, she counts. the dog, mr. bebe, should count, but he doesn't. complete the census online, by phone, or by mail. shape your future. start here at 2020census.gov

>> laura: stacy aprons used believe all women, but that was before the biden states began. >> what he is accused of doing that he had flatly and clearly denied, and i believe his denial speaks not to who he is, but who i am. >> if you thought there was evidence, you were not supported him as a candidate? >> of course not, because i

believe that we are obliged to serve justice to those who have been wronged. >> laura: you see how this is just impossible for them. we will have to pause there, stacy. the "fox news @ night" team takes it over tonight. it's going have a great night. breaking news, though whole plot got a lot thicker in the case of general michael flynn. an unusual development, the federal judge has decided to keep the perjury case open. against the wishes of the justice department who outside parties weigh in on whether it is appropriate to drop the charges. news comes as d.c. is on edge by the acting director of national intelligence ric grenell, handing over a list of obama administration officials ending in masking of flynn. we will get to the bottom of it tonight. and stunning moves i