in the meantime, it was an up-and-down day on wall street, ultimately down on some of these very concerns. how is it all going down, particularly in china? that will do it here. "the five" is now. ♪ >> juan: hello, everyone. i am juan williams along with jesse watters, greg gutfeld greg gutfeld, dana perino and emily compagno. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five." ♪ this is a fox news alert. the family of rayshard brooks expected to speak soon following the announcement of charges against two police officers involved in that shooting death. ex-atlanta officer garrett rolfe, the cop who shot rayshard brooks in the back wall outside a wendy's facing 11 total

charges including felony murder and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. the other officer involved david brosnan will testify against his partner as a states witness. facing three charges including aggravated assault. body cam footage shows the officers having a calm conversation with brooks for more than 40 minutes before things got violent. brooks resisted arrest, stole an officers taser and took off. the officer said brooks fired the taser at him and that's when he shot him. fox news contributor and former homicide detective ted williams reacting to the charges. >> this is why this case i believe, these officers will not be found guilty. at that stage, unfortunately, mr. brooks turned and shot the taser at the officer. a taser is a weapon. a taser can be a dangerous

weapon. we are not watching justice take place here. i don't give a damn about this white-black situation. these are human beings. this is a rush to judgment. this is to satisfy a crowd. prosecutions should never be based on satisfy a crowd and that is what we have here. this is wholly unfair. >> juan: emily, you are the lawyer on the panel today so let me get your thoughts on these multiple charges and as you just heard ted williams, former detective, former lawyer for the police here in washington, says he thinks that the prosecution went too far. >> emily: right, two things struck me, first of all the fundamental failure of basic arrest protocol that these officers failed to do which was telling mr. brooks he was under arrest and also their behavior after mr. brooks was shot,

kicking him and standing on him and the failure to render timely medical aid. it was really not -- i know it was a surprise for those in the courtroom because you could hear the audible gasps. i want to speak to those charges in that georgia law requires that a grand jury indictment before those charges are actually formalized. given the fact that we already know the second officer had flipped on officer rolfe and is testifying against him, he's also facing the death penalty for this, i would be shocked if this even went to trial. i foresee there being an eventual plea agreement. my final thought is just that the amplification of the tragedy here is so sad. this is another life lost. these are two more police officers who had their lives ruined. one is literally facing the death penalty in the ripple effect for all of us, community and law enforcement, i think it is frankly never ending the tragic. >> juan: i hear it in your

voice, emily. jesse, i know you think that the officer had reason to fear for his safety. when brooks ran away and then fire the taser. what do you think about these charges? >> jesse: i think it's a political overcharge because the prosecutors in a hotly contested runoff election and he's under state investigation for pocketing six figures that was supposed to go to the state to fight crime and it went into his personal bank account. that's what that's all about, but he's playing with fire. we are looking at a huge crime wave in the next decade because of this. this is the ferguson effect on steroids. police now, especially atlanta, they will pull back and let the streets run wild. if there is an arrest, i bet suspects are taking their chances with officers after this. it's clear as day, juan, that they gave the sky so many second chances. they were so polite, some respectful. they tried to waking up twice.

they asked him if he was okay, if he needed an ambulance. he pushed them in the veins trigger face, wrestled with them, points the taser, fires it. if it connects, it, a capacity of the officer and he steals the firearm. he's already stolen and taser. he can do whatever he wants. we talked about police reform. we need that. we need people reform and i'm not talking about this case. i'm not talking about black-white. anybody, if you get pulled over, this is what i do. yes officer. no officer. may i go, officer? i have my license and registration. if you have a small amount of marijuana in the car, it's a ticket. know the law. if you have a weapon in the car say i have a weapon in the car. it's loaded under the seat. if you want to fight the officer, fight him in court. you're talking about if you have warrants? that's on you. but if you run if you resist, if you assault and officer, you're racking up a massive amount of

felonies that are going to haunt you for life. they have helicopters. they have dogs. you're going to get caught and you're going to get in big trouble. people need to be respectful of law enforcement. officer doesn't have to pull out the taser, doesn't have to wrestle, doesn't have to pull out a firearm. all of these finds, these lives lost, these tickets, they can all be saved if people just start conducting themselves appropriately and that goes for everybody no matter who you are. >> juan: okay. greg, one of the elements of republican proposals here in washington on police reform has to do with de-escalating tensions before you get to a violent situation such as we thought in that wendy's parking lot in atlanta. do you think that applies to this case? is it a case where you could reasonably say let brooks run away.

what's the problem? he is no threat to public yeah, i mean, i think you can look at every single case, because there aren't a lot of them, like i said out of the 50 million police encounters in a year, you have roughly 50 cases like this where an unarmed man or a man in this case holding a taser is shot dead. there are more whites than there are blacks and it's a greater proportion of encounters. the deaths are more among whites. you can actually, they are enough you can look at each one of them and you can see how different each one is. each one has its own problem when it comes to tactics and training. you can find a flaw in each one but you also find these other universal things like resisting arrest, intoxication, and flaws in tactics and training. these all come together. so the goal of this reform movement is to take these one and a million tragedies, because

again, it's one -- 50 out of 50000000 encounters and go from one in a million to zero in a million which i believe is impossible because we are imperfect human beings and is going to be problems. we do have to increase training and we do have to re-examine the tactics but i'm going to back to my suggestion earlier about police recusal where a black officer only handles black suspects and white officers only handle white suspects. people will call it, isn't it discrimination? but actually found out that we are doing this already. female cops frisk female suspects. you go to tsa, juan, i know you are shaking your head. it is female tsa officers patting down females in line. we do segregate in this world in order to reduce, you know, certain kinds of shocking visuals.

we know what's behind this. rage. we know what's behind this rage, the perception of racism. what the sheriff said about these charges is that it's kind of and appeasement to the mob. appeasement signals don't work. they don't work. we saw wendy's with half a million dollars, half a million dollars, they gave a half a million dollars. and the restaurant was still burned down. that has to be remembered. >> juan: greg, i have to interrupt for a second. the family of rayshard brooks is having a press conference. here we are. >> from the very beginning. i want everybody to know that we want you to stay focused. this is not the finish line. this is the starting point. yes, we appreciate and we

commend the d.a.'s office for charging these officers appropriately but that's just step one. step to his convictions on all charges -- step two is convictions on all charges and after that we have to try to find a way to make things right for the brooks family and for the children. like we said before, justice is not something that's going to be easy in this case. it never is. how do you find justice for three little girls who will never see their father again? how do you get justice for a little girl who on her birthday every single year from now until the rest of her life she will remember that that is the day she found out that her dad died. how do you get justice for that little girl? since this happened i have

talked to several people who have said different things about what went on, what mr. brooks should or should not have been doing, about what the officer should or should not have been doing it to those people, i say with these new revelations, again i implore you, look into your heart and have some empathy for another human being. because that's what rayshard brooks is and was, another human being. he may not look like you. he may not be from where you're from but he's another human being just like you. tomika miller is a human being, she's a mother, she's a daughter. she's a wife and she is a human being just like you. so when you see officer rolfe cake rayshard brooks after he shot him in the back, while he's laying on the ground dying,

think about that before you start to get into things that don't matter at all, that are completely irrelevant to this case and to generally just to all of us as humans. we should be together on this, not apart. i was taught when i was a kid that you don't kick a man while he's down. i learned that playing sports. i was taught that that was kind of an american thing. one of our ideals. we don't kick people when they're down. what you saw and what we all saw is one officer standing on a man who was dying, standing on top of him, and then the other

officer literally kicking him while he was on the ground dying him. literally kicking him while he's down. what that showed me as i was watching the press conference is this, america is not america for all americans. and as we come to the july 4th holiday and a couple of weeks, there will be a lot of people celebrating. but there will be just as many people who are not going to feel comfortable celebrating, who will still be in the streets fighting for justice. again we ask everyone, continue fighting. keep doing your part. stand with us and support this family because right now they really need you. thank you. >> i just want to say thank you, and i just hope that everything falls out how it needs to fall out and these officers are

charged. i'm really hurt. father's day is coming up and all i can do is just think about, what if my husband was still here? >> the biggest question is how do we feel about the charges? i know there's a lot of them. a lot of churches. this isn't like a celebration or a victory lap of watching these officers get charged. nobody's happy. nobody is celebrating because this never should have happened. we shouldn't have to celebrate as african-americans when we get a piece of justice, like today. we shouldn't have to celebrate and parade one and officer is held accountable for actions that we saw and actions that we didn't know about until today. some people thought we would be happy and be celebrating and have our fists in the air but

it's more a disappointment that this is the state of policing and this is where we are at. but i saw a lot of hope today. as the district attorney said, this is the first time another officer has decided to be a government witness and testify against another officer. that's what policing is. that's the kind of officers that make these streets safe, that stop instances like this from happening. when you're willing to step up and say that was wrong. even if that's going to risk my career, even if people won't like me and other officers will be angry. that's the reason i will always say, not every single officers out there trying to kill somebody but we are also not going to play that rhetoric game that you saw today of all officers are great. no, we have seen what's happened. it's the same assumptions that we don't want officers making about black people, that all people are from the ghetto, that

all people are good and we are up to no good and you need to search every black male that you see which leads to situations like this. it's both assumptions. watching these policies that directly affect families like this, these arguments, democrats versus republicans, all of this ridiculousness and they are not starting from step one. how do we actually fix this, not what's best for your political party. the things that i saw today, we are going to be back here next year. what's the point of a national collection of data if the data is flawed? we have handled cases where the internal reports aren't taken properly so you are collecting data that's nonsense: doesn't hold officers accountable unless you fix officers and internal affairs first. they don't want realities. they want policies and elections and that's fine but we will end here again.

was this justice? not yet. we still don't have a definition for it. it's more heartache that families have to go through this invite the public to try to get justice for a man that was shot in the back twice. but we do think everybody in this country for the outpouring of support, the people marching for change peacefully. keeping his name alive positively. maybe one day this country will get it right with policing and we will all come together. brief questions real quick. >> reporter: your point about the second officer agreeing to cooperate to be a witness. the attorney saying the statement that the second officer is cooperating but has not agreed to be a witness against the other officer. has not agreed to plead guilty to anything. do you have an update on this? >> i didn't believe he would plead guilty to anything. the information that they've

already gotten so far has led them to believe that this is going to help secure the prosecution of the other offic officer. >> juan: those were the lawyers, chris stewart and justin miller, for the family of rayshard brooks, the man who was shot in the wendy's parking lot last friday night in atlanta, georgia. tomika miller, his widow, is there with the lawyers that you just heard. dana perino, wanted to come to you just for a general reaction to what you heard but also i guess to the whole notion of police reform, because the poll showed overwhelming support for it at this juncture. >> dana: yes and sometimes it takes events like we've seen in order to enforce change or at least get people to the table. the president had come forward with an executive order. we all know executive orders are not as strong as legislation but that's why republicans have put forward in the senate a bill,

the house, the democrats. that's how legislation gets done and there's a commitment from the leader of the senate to move it forward in a more timely fashion and not waiting until after the fourth of july holiday. on that front, i think people can take some comfort that washington is being responsive. i was thinking about in minneapolis in the case of derek chauvin and their frustration amongst the community that it took three or four days to get the charges against the officer. for minneapolis, that was actually quite quick, quite rapid. one of the things that prosecutors dressed in minneapolis, remember the charges were not second-degree murder. there was third-degree at first but he explained to the community, we have to be able to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. that's how our system works. if this goes to a jury and that jury does not convict on these very tough charges, that will be

a major disappointment. emily could be right. there might be a plea deal. that might happen. but if you're the officer, you might want to take it to her jury because again, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. i will stop there since i know we got to run and i'm sure we will be talking about this a lot more in the future. >> juan: i think that was insightful. i had, what some are calling a new example of conservative censorship after nbc apparently encourages google to go after right wing websites. that's next for you on "the five."

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ wherever you make go, lexus will welcome you back with exceptional offers. get zero percent financing

and make no payments for up to 90 days on all 2020 lexus models. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.

♪ >> emily: welcome back. new accusations of censoring conservatives, google banning right leaning financial blog zero hedge and warning the federal estate could be next. the tech giant claiming posts

and comment sections violated policies. nbc news influence google to take action. republicans are responding with a bill that would allow americans to sue big tech companies over political censorship. the doj is proposing new rules to limit internet companies liability protections. greg, i want to start with you. you've been in so many formats of media. what's your take? >> greg: i think this is how they woke crowd works. if you can't win in the field of ideas, you contact companies and report what you believe to be offensive material. the companies don't want the hassle so they operate on a hair trigger. they will do anything to comply with this mob and actually it's a fairly effective means of silencing speech. people will say this isn't silencing speech because google is a private company or it's a company, it's not a government and nobody's telling you what not to say but the fact is if

your career and livelihood is at the mercy of an intolerant woke activism, then it is silencing speech. it is harming you. this is actually spreading out and it's really frightening because you can see how the media avoids data and statistics about law enforcement in favor of polling. remember, polling aren't facts. those are gauging feelings but stats tell you about behavior and we are not hearing about statistics because the media is so cowardly about it. if they see a statistic as a third rail straight to being canceled or ruined and it's a travesty because we need to know the facts in order to push the ball forward on issues like law enforcement and instead we are just stuck in emotion and symbolism and virtue signaling. >> emily: dana, what are your thoughts on the new senate bill? >> dana: one of the things i

think that google got suckered by an nbc media hoax. they had so many calling around saying hey, have you seen this in your comments? no we haven't seen it and then as greg said they were on a hair trigger and then they had a major public relations screwup. so that leads to the fact that you have on the left aoc, congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez, she wants the tech companies to be regulated because she thinks they don't do enough to suppress speech that they don't like. on the other hand you have someone like josh hawley, the senator from missouri, on the right, saying we want to regulate the tech companies so that they won't censor people on the right. so it's weird. they kind of want the same thing but for very different reasons. congress i believe has had a little bit of a light touch when it comes to regulating the internet and big tech companies because we like the innovation. we like the freedom. i think we still like the first amendment. but actions like what happened

yesterday or the concern that there was an action about to be taken against somebody raises everybody's hackles and i do think that the tech companies are looking at some sort of big reconciling in d.c. coming soon. >> emily: jesse, how do you read this, especially the reaction of the comments, not initial content? >> jesse: can we defund the speech police, emily? that's the only police that the democrats alike. i am sick of these narcs, snitches, control freaks, intellectual lightweights that can't handle debate and they have to destroy you instead. think about what they are doing to the president on twitter or any conservative on twitter. you say something, you're canceled. they sue the president to stop his rallies. they don't want the task force briefings. they boycott fox news. people are cut businesses and restaurants. you can even say anything

anymore. all lives matter is racist. cops lives matter is racist. they could barely trickle barely handle merry christmas. radical islam, you can't say that. you can't say anything. they're coming after the clothes you wear. they're going after maga had sent teachers. after apologize? how about statues, tearing down statues, getting rid of movies and mascots and logos, history. pretty much everything the left doesn't like they need to erase. this is the cultural right now. it's bigger than a culture war and anything they have to disagree with they want to wipe out. they want to bankrupt you. they want you fired. if you work for the president, they would throw you in prison. while everybody is so intimidated and scared by the mob, the left is seizing more and more power all over the country. they are not going to be satisfied until they have

absolute control and anything they don't like about this country they want gone. the scary thing is they don't like a lot about this country so it's all on the table for them. and people better start realizing right now, this is a fight. right now everything is on the table for destruction. >> emily: juan, can you speak to jesse's points, especially the one about cancel culture and how there are certain conservatives, principles or symbols that really have been considered totally alt-right and have now been essentially completely canceled by the left. speak to that please. >> juan: sure, emily. i am a big free speech advocate. i have been fired for speaking my mind and here on "the five" i don't think there are any muzzles. people can say what they want to say we go at it pretty good but i do think that in this case you're talking about a private company.

there's no first amendment protection for a private company. they can select what voices, what opinions they want to feature on their platforms. that's america. that's the law, and they have that right. i don't think that we can say you must hear this. you must hear that. of course in response to what jesse was saying, you know, i think that there are offensive symbols and materials that other people, let's say the germans, they don't have statues to hitler. there is a reason for that. yet we have confederate statues, statues to people who are traitors to this country, to america, wanted to break us apart. i think that's an indication of something out of balance. so to my mind -- >> jesse: what about christopher columbus? >> juan: hang on, let me finish please. i think when we think about private companies, again, sounding like a conservative, think we should stay out of the business of private companies

making decisions that are best left to them and their shareholders. >> jesse: those decisions only affect conservatives, that's the issue. >> juan: that's not true, absolutely not true. the biggest media company in america, "the wall street journal," fox news, rush limbaugh. >> jesse: you know it. the audience know it. conservatives -- >> emily: coming up -- we have to go. we have to save this for the next block. this is not going to land well, coming up, the new airline regulation that has greg fired up. stay with us. these are real people, not actors, who've got their eczema under control. with less eczema you can show more skin. so roll up those sleeves. and help heal your skin from within with dupixent. dupixent is the first treatment of its kind that continuously treats moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis, even between flare ups.

dupixent is a biologic and not a cream or steroid. many people taking dupixent saw clear or almost clear skin. and had significantly less itch. don't use if you're allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, which is severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. if you take asthma medicines, don't change or stop them without talking to your doctor. so help heal your skin from within and talk to your eczema specialist about dupixent. if your financial situation has changed, we may be able to help.

if your financial situation has changed, and my side super soft? yes, with the sleep number 360 smart bed, on sale now, you can both adjust your comfort with your sleep number setting. come on pup, time to go. can it help me fall asleep faster? yes, by gently warming your feet but can it help keep me asleep? absolutely, it intelligently senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. so you can really promise better sleep? not promise. prove. and now, during the lowest prices of the season, the queen sleep number 360 c4 smart bed is only $1,299, save $400. only for a limited time. to learn more, go to sleepnumber.com. ♪ you know limu,g after all these years it's the ones that got away that haunt me the most. [ squawks ] 'cause you're not like everybody else. that's why liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. what? oh, i said... uh, this is my floor.

nooo! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ however, there is one thing you can be certain of. the men and women of the united states postal service. we're here to deliver cards and packages from loved ones and also deliver the peace of mind of knowing that essentials like prescriptions are on their way. every day, all across america, we deliver for you. and we always will. ♪ >> dana: welcome back. new details from john bolton's book coming out. the ex-national security advisor is accusing president trump of misconduct including asking china for help with his

reelection, that is among other various allegations of unethical behavior that bolton lays out for joining us to react his chris wallace. he's the author of the brand-new book "countdown 1945: the extraordinary story of the atomic bomb and the 116 days that change the world." chris, good to have you. we'll take it around the table and ask you a few questions. let me start with the john bolton question. interesting situation because bolton had written a book. he does not have permission from the government to release the book but the book is coming out and you have an interview that's already been done with "abc news" that's going to air on sunday night and now you have an excerpt from john bolton in "the wall street journal" that ran just a couple hours ago. this is coming out. what do you think the big take away is? will be a bombshell or more of the same? >> it's significant. there have been other people, members of the trump administration who's come out but nobody this high up, the

national security advisor, and written a book and he does have a lot of damaging things to say that the president, according to bolton, pleaded with chinese president xi to buy more farm goods because that would help trump win reelection with the victories and the farm states. a variety of other embarrassing things. he hits the democrats, says a mistake they made in impeaching trump was that they should've actually gone on more issues, not just ukraine. there were a variety of foreign policy issues. in terms of the impact it's going to have, i have been thinking about it. i don't think it will have a lot of impact. people are so locked in on donald trump. you either think he's, you know, been the savior of the country and has managed a great economy and is going to bring it back after covid-19 and all of that or you just hate him or certainly don't want him to be president. i'm not sure this is going to change a lot of minds one way or

the other. >> dana: jesse watters, you have a question for chris? >> jesse: sure. a lot of the audience obviously hasn't read the book so we can hash out the specific allegations and there's some big ones. putting that aside, chris, if you look at someone who i guess lobbies to be part of a presidential administration, is hired as i guess national security advisor and then is entrusted with classified information, over a year i think he was there. and then leaves and writes pretty much a tell-all about the experience immediately after being fired right before the election, doesn't that seem a little, i don't know how to characterize it. i guess i would say unusual. >> i think you can argue that it says as much about john bolton as it does about donald trump. i will tell you, because i was around and interviewing the

president and when he was president-elect and he was considering john bolton for a top job at that point in 2016 after the election when he was president-elect. he had two concerns, one that he was too aggressive, too hawkish, one of the neocons who helped get us into iraq, and the other was the question of loyalty. dana can speak to this, george w. bush expended a lot of political capital giving him a recess appointment to be u.n. ambassador and when he left that post, he turned on bush and attacked his foreign policies. he was concerned about the loyalty of john bolton. having said that, i don't think it matters. i mean it matters in an ethical sense in your judgment of john bolton but news is news. remember when the russians were able to hack john podesta's email and they put it out and the clinton campaign in 2016 kept saying this is stolen material by the russians. you shouldn't be reporting it. news is news. we are going to report this.

>> dana: juan williams. >> juan: i just wanted to ask a question about the book, chris. congratulations on "countdown." i think in the current atmosphere, lots of people are going to ask, what about lessons in terms of decision-making, leadership that you saw coming from president truman in the days before he makes that, it might be the decision of the century, to drop the bomb on hiroshima. >> thanks, juan. there are a couple points i would make about "countdown 1945" and truman. one was he was really meticulous. it wasn't dropped the bomb or nothing. it was dropped the bomb or invade japan, and he went over it again and again and again. in fact i think there would've been more loss of life invading japan the other wasn't dropping the bomb. two, he sought out opposing opinions. he had a meeting shortly before the bomb was dropped with

eisenhower in potsdam germany and eisenhower said i don't think you should drop the bomb, mr. president. i think the japanese are going to surrender anyway and i don't think we should be the country that introduces this technology and i think it will hurt our moral standing. truman didn't follow eisenhower's advice but he welcomed it. the third thing, point i would make is that all this talk about truman being famously decisive, the buck stops here, he agonized over this decision. he couldn't sleep at night. he complained of fierce headaches. and he wrote in his diaries about this in apocalyptic terms, the use of the bomb. he said it's a terrible weapon and he said it's the fire and destruction that had been prophecy in the bible. >> dana: wow. chris, it's a great book getting great reviews. thank you for coming on the show today. we'll see you on sunday of course. thank you very much. coming up, flying can be a hassle. there is a new rule that has

greg kind of mad in the age of coronavirus. in your feet? get relief finally, with magnilife® pain relieving foot cream. while also restoring cracked, damaged, and itchy skin. and get living. available at your local retailer.

yeah. this moving thing never gets any easier. well, xfinity makes moving super easy. i can transfer my internet and tv service in about a minute. wow, that is easy. almost as easy as having those guys help you move. we are those guys. that's you? the truck adds 10 pounds.

in the arms. -okay... transfer your service online in a few easy steps. now that's simple, easy, awesome. transfer your service in minutes, making moving with xfinity a breeze. visit xfinity.com/moving today.

♪ >> greg: all right. have you heard the phrase never let a pandemic go to waste? now you have because i just said

it. some airlines are doing just that, delta american among others are suspending all or part of their booze service reduce interactions. and to limit bad behavior. this in medical circles is called stupid, stupid highly stupid idea. do these idiots have any idea what alcohol sales boom during the lockdown? because we were trapped in a room and we couldn't get out. much like being on a plane where you're trapped with no way out unless you open an emergency exit and aim for a giant bush. i wouldn't suggest that under any circumstances unless you are seated next to joy behar. it's a fact that flying is getting less enjoyable. yet we never get anywhere faster. as computer speed doubles every two years, we still produce new jets, lumbering through the air at the same speeds is the old ones did in the 70s. where's, today we are packed like sweaty veal, forced to endure endless

delays in bizarre regulations that often leave us with hunger-induced migraines and distended. now they want to take the booze? i get the face masks and believe me i hate drunk jackasses who fly. even a hate myself. but to punish me because of the actions of a few is not the way to solve problems. sadly that seems to be the trend with just a few bad apples, we don't just throw out the whole batch. we defined the orchard. it's enough to make me drink and hate myself tomorrow. all right, emily. the best part about travel is that you can't be bothered by anyone and you can sit for three hours and have a cocktail and chill. they take that away from us, it's over. >> emily: everyone is going to be on edibles. i have been on commutes across the country for six hours. six hours each way of sobriety

and mask wearing and everything. honestly this whole situation makes me so depressed. i'm with you. i'm going to train all the way to new york from now on. >> greg: there you go. juan, everybody is going to be on edibles. i have a feeling emily is right. people are going to be sneaking stuff on. people are going to be sneaking. they're going to have duct taped booze in glad bags. does it bother you? >> juan: i like sweaty veal. what an image. i do think, you know, the airlines have to be concerned about the workers as well as the customers. so when you hear them talk, you've got to keep in mind they are worried about, if the stewardesses and the pilots started getting sick, they don't have anyone to run an airline. the cdc, as you said, recommends the mask and it requires -- cdc says no close contact. if you're serving drinks up and

down the aisle. i understand but i also hear your voice. gosh, we are going to be confined on a plane for a long time with nothing to drink. >> greg: all they have to do is have a big basket of little bottles of booze and wear rubber gloves and just throw the drinks out to people and people could have their own mixers. >> jesse: let me get this straight. you can bring a therapy goat on a plane but you can't have a scotch? just when i thought i couldn't hate coronavirus anymore, this comes along? some of the great pleasures in life, drinking on a boat, drinking on a ski lift, and drinking on a plane. do not take this away from us. some of us, i mean, our lives would be totally different. if dana perino weren't plastered on that flight, she wouldn't have had the courage to flirt with peter and they never would've gotten together. [laughter] >> greg: so true.

>> dana: and it was 10:00 in the morning. >> greg: that's exactly what i was going to say. dana, care to respond to jesse? >> dana: i mean, i was totally hammered. it was 9:30 in the morning. i almost missed my flight. it was unbelievable. here's what i say. bring back the road trip. i love a road trip. i'm very, very good at it. >> greg: yeah. they are taking everything away from us. it's not fair. it's just not fair. with that, "one more thing" is up next. >> dana: just stay home. >> greg: i am. whoo! don't do it. don't you dare. i don't think so! [ sighs ] it's okay, big fella. we're gonna get through this together. [ baseball bat cracks ] nice rip, robbie. ♪ raaah! when you bundle home and auto insurance through progressive,

you get more than just a big discount. i'm gonna need you to leave. you get relentless protection. [ baseball bat cracks ] thousands of women with metastatic breast cancer, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body, are living in the moment and taking ibrance. ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor is for postmenopausal women or for men with hr+/her2- metastatic breast cancer, as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole significantly delayed disease progression versus letrozole, and shrank tumors in over half of patients. patients taking ibrance can develop low white blood cell counts,

ibrance may cause severe inflammation of the lungs that can lead to death. tell your doctor right away if you have new or worsening symptoms, including trouble breathing, shortness of breath, cough, or chest pain. before taking ibrance, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include low red blood cell and low platelet counts, infections, tiredness, nausea, sore mouth, abnormalities in liver blood tests, diarrhea, hair thinning or loss, vomiting, rash, and loss of appetite. be in your moment. ask your doctor about ibrance.

be in your moment. if your child doesn't 1 iseem themself at times,ed. they may not be hydrated enough. wabba wabba! all new, plant powered creative roots gives kids the hydration they need, with the fruit flavors they love, and 1 gram of sugar. find new creative roots in the kids' juice aisle.

♪ >> juan: they can take away our drinks but they can't take away "one more thing." jesse. >> jesse: time for jesse's angry bird news.

look at that. my hair has changed a lot. do you want to see or hear the most annoying sound in the wor world? [screeching] >> emily: oh, my gosh. >> jesse: that's an australian cockatoo. ironically that's the exact same sound greg gutfeld makes when we change the rundown late in the afternoon. >> juan: greg, you have to respond. >> greg: i heard that that cockatoo will be sitting in on "the view." that will be exciting. okay. i am finally doing my podcast. doing my podcast. the first one just went up.

it's at foxnewspodcast.com. i interview a legend named robert johnson, a music legend but not the legend legend, a different legend, robert johnson. he's been everywhere. you can hear the music in the background. amazing guitarist, addition for the rolling stones. he has played with everyone. he knows everybody. it's a fantastic podcast, i urge you to check it out. it's at foxnewspodcast.com. that's it. >> juan: i hope you didn't trade his soul to the devil. dana, europe. >> dana: i have had the nursing home residents of our country on my mind. we have talked about it and focused on it. they've been shut up in their rooms for three and half months isolated and it's really upsetting. one guy in new hampshire in a nursing home, he began a pen pal program for the seniors at senior crest -- summer crest

community. word of the program has spread like wildfire. over 700 letters have come. they can't take more pen pals. america responded with really great heart and generosity here. so you have anyone in a nursing home, you might want to send them a note. >> juan: a lot of love. >> emily: the cutest bunny was born in his name is leo but he doesn't have any ears. he looks like the cutest almost like a gerbil. he can still hear. he has an irish accent and no ears. >> dana: he has ears. he doesn't have the skin. >> emily: internal ears. doesn't have external. >> juan: but he can hear.

okay. >> greg: unlike a lot of us. >> juan: you've heard of casper the friendly ghost. how about having casper over to dinner. look at the detroit area restaurant. to keep customers safely apart they cut out ghostlike figures and seated them at empty tables. the idea is to keep the customers safely apart as they dine. it works. the people returned to the restaurant after three months are enjoying it according to the owner. he said it's an attraction. anyway, people making the best of these tough times. what do you think, gregory? did you like that one? >> greg: i don't know. i've a feeling people are going to walk by and go, is it a ral rally? >> juan: i think people get the joke. >> jesse: i knew you couldn't leave that alone.

>> juan: i have emily's ears. all right, thanks, guys. that's it for us. "special report" is up next with bret baier. hey, bret. >> bret: hey, juan. thanks, everybody. good evening. i am bret baier. waking trickle breaking tonight the white police officer who fatally shot an african-american man last friday in atlanta is facing a felony murder charge they could put him in prison for possibly lead to his execution. the district attorney in fulton county georgia is pursuing 11 charges against now former officer garrett rolfe. steve harrigan starts us off from atlanta. >> the reaction on the street when people first heard the charge of murder, there was some surprise, even some applause. but then when they heard the new details released today, that one of the officers kicked brooks' body when he was dying on the