one in the country. costco, 40 percent discount on amazon, costco, walmart, target books a million, barnes & noble. 56 days remain until you decide. laura ingraham takes it from here. >> do you get a set of ginsu knives with it? >> could you get in anymore plugs? you have the number one show, the number one book, you have the number two, number one radio show. now we just have to get the president reelected. >> i want the mob to choke on their words in 56 days we can now project that donald j trump will be reelected to president and watch the collective minds get blown. the american people can do that. >> we need that videotape montage again of all the anchors. remember the next day they alle wore black. they all wore black the next day.

>> i pinned the tweet on my twitter >> i watched it on your twitterberry fantastic show, great to see you. >> i'm laura ingraham, and this is "the ingraham angle." a man who spent six years by joe biden side is here to spill the beans about the former vps decline, plus how putin him related him. and can't miss with a stenographer stenographer is straight ahead. the dubious social justice heroes and how pressure for black lives matter is prompting them up. but first, biden 101, the war party exposed. that is the focus of tonight's angle. >> we've entered the sprint to november and the angle is back to translate joe biden's word for you. he has tried mightily to muddy the waters on his real views and actual record of supporting wars.

>> do you say your vote on the iraq war was based on the representation this wasn't about going to war, this was about presenting a clear at least threat to saddam hussein? bernie sanders has eyes right through that. can we say that senator sanders judgment about that was better than yours? >> look, the reason i voted the way i did was to try to prevent a war from happening. >> it is completely false. and anyone who has any momentary memory of what was happening at the time in 2002 and 2003 knows that. this is why biden has sought to capitalize on the now debunked atlantic magazine smear against the president despite the facte that the most incendiary claims in that piece have been disavowed by at least 21 current or former administration sources

on the record, by the way. >> no president has ever talked about our servicemen and women in that way. i'm sorry if i'm coming close to losing my temper, but the simple truth is, if that's how you talk about our veterans, you have no business being president of the united states of america. period. >> the biden campaign of course is eager to drive a wedge between president trump and his most loyal constituencies, and he happily took the assist from atlantic writer jeffrey goldberg who used anonymous sources to conjure up the bogus claim that trump canceled his visit to an american military cemetery in france two years ago because he didn't believe in honoring violent heroes. goldbergrg went on to claim in a conversation with senior staff members on the morning of the scheduled visit trump said why should i go to that cemetery,

it's filled with losers. in a separate conversation on the same trip, he referred to the more than 1800 marines who lost their lives as suckers for getting killed. this isn't the first time that goldberg cited anonymous sources to prop up a ridiculous claim. or the first time his writing fits seamlessly with the pro- war party agenda. back in february of 2003, while writing for the new yorker, goldberg was busy selling the iraq wmd claim and the idea that saddam hussein had in some way aided and abetted al qaeda. he was one of the most influential journalists in the united states whose reporting led to a broad public acceptance for invading iraq. here is an interview with robert siegel he did of npr. >> in all of your reporting on al qaeda and iraq, what is the strongest piece of evidence that would suggest there really is a link between the two? t >> i would have to say it something i learned of recently

and have in this new story, which is in the mid '90s, series of emissaries went from afghanistan earlier from sudan to baghdad to convince the iraqi intelligence service to provide al qaeda with chemical weapons training in afghanistan. according to my sources, they succeeded and iraqis did in fact help al qaeda in the teaching of the use of poison gas. >> while many of us including this host took that reporting as gospel, big mistake. well, at least i did a real mea culpa and changed my thinking completely about these types of preemptive wars, specifically those in the middle east. and ended up believing that they would make us weaker across the board, as they did, but mr. goldberg did not. although years later heap delivered us apology for his role in peddlingng this pro- invasion narrative, he

nevertheless insisted onon the dignity of the story the original story. the dignity of a story that ended up supporting a war that cost trillions of dollars in the lives of over 4,400 americans. such as the hubris of an unrepentant liberal interventionist. this brings us back to joe biden. why did mr. goldberg, after his huge iraqi war embarrassment, pull a stunt like this in the campaigns homestretch? to prop up the candidacy of the aging war hawk himself, joe biden.he that's why. biden laughably has tried to claim that despite having voted for the war, he was against it almost as soon as it started. in reality, biden was pushing for military intervention in iraq five years before theli invasion. this was a 1998 foreign relations committee hearing. >> many believe as long as

saddam is at the helm, there is no reasonable prospect. you or any other inspector is ever going to be able to guarantee that we have routed out root and branch, the entirety of saddam's program relative to what weapons of mass destruction. the only way we are going to get rid of saddam hussein is we are going to end up having to start it alone, start it alone, and it's going to require guys like you in uniform to be back on foot, in the desert taking saddam down. >> first of all, he's been in politics a long time, right? but before he won the nomination, his record on wars was actually beginning to catch up to him.rd the left-wing anti- trump website was incredulous that party might actually nominate a war hawk like biden to go up against trump who won in part by taking on the war hawks in his

own party. and biden's explanations weren't washing. what biden did was to help ensure war happened while trying to wash his hands of responsibility for it.le he helped build the car for bush, filled it up with gas, saw that bush was drunk, gave him licensed to do what he wanted. eventually, biden pretended he was shocked that the streaks were littered with mangled bodies.ep the intercept which is another antiwar anti- trump site has also called out biden and the democrats in general for their own long history of supporting wars of preemption. intoxicated by the maelstrom of crises both domestic and global there's beenen, little accountig for these tragedies. the impact of the wars did not bear mention at the democratic national convention, but in the end a catastrophe of this scale can't just be brushed aside. and biden claims that donald trump has disrespected the troops?

a pathetic drive-by smear, and a desperate attempt to cover up his own lies about his own history of rubberstamping whatever the pro- interventionist types wanted. the military-industrial complex was never comfortable with trump despite the massive increase in spending he pushed back in 2017h while the neocons and the foreign policy establishment seized on goldberg's hit piece. they knew that he, the generals knew he asked uncomfortables questions like why are we still in germany 75 years after world war ii ended? and why are people more worried about russia today than china? and why doesn't nato nations why don't they contribute more for their own military defense again? a lot of these war hawks don't like answering these questions

or having them asked at all. and they know that biden will not ask them. he won't demand answers to any of those questions. that's why they like him. simply stated, biden is a lifetime member of the pro-war pro-surveillance state crowd. the far left epitomized by the squad, they don't like any of this, they don't like it, but it seems they have made in implicit devil's bargain that they will control social policy to push reparations and court appointments in a biden administration and then they will look the other way, at least for now when it comes two foreign policy. the rest of us don't have to make that bargain. do you know why? we actually have a candidate who fights what eisenhower called the military-industrial complex a man who seeks to bring our troops home from endless unnecessary wars and who recognizes that we can't solve all of our problems by bombing cthem. if you want to rein in the

pentagon, president trump is the only credible option. a vote for biden will lead us back to the disastrouswi policis that ledto to the invasion of iq in the first place. and that isin the angle. joining me now is a former trump nsc official and author of the stakes. michael, i've got a lot of news on this and we will get to that in a moment. have you ever heard donald trump utter one disparaging comment about our troops or our fallen heroes? >> no. and i was with him for the first 14 months of the demonstration on every foreign trip where i had lots of interaction with the military bases overseas and the united states, i never heard him say anything like that. one thing i heard him say which you just mentioned in his

opening, i heard him ask really pointed questions to generals and senior officials that they had trouble answering. you know, on more than one location they were taken aback. i think they'd gotten used to getting rubberstamped, they were so unused to answering these kinds of questions that they would get flustered and couldn't think of anything. at one point the president said which i think they thought they were going into a meeting where they would stick something in front of him and he would sign it. he saidysk okay, and he kept thm very long and asked them lots and lots of questions he said okay the next time i see you you're going to have answers to all of these. i'm not going to do anything until i hear more from you. and let's just say the mood around the table was somewhat swollen and the meeting broke u and they streamed out. >> michael, i want to get your reaction to the breaking news tonight as senior defense official telling fox news the pentagon, the president, and pentagon will announce tomorrow that they are cutting u.s. troop 00vels in iraq by a third from 5200 to about 3500 troops. this announcement was apparently

planned before the atlantic article dropped, and it's keeping with his promise to bring our troops home. but could this have been anul impetus at least for pushing this atlantic hit piece out with zero on the record sources? >> it could be, i'm sure, but i think the reason for the atlantic hit piece is much more political.iv it's to seeen what they can do to drive down the tapresident's popularity with te i hate to say it also has to do with a lot of this kind of crazy coo talk that the democrats have been engaging in over the course of the year including joe biden saying the military won't let him stay past january 20th. the military will be on my side. a lot of this kind of nutty talk that really terribly tears atwh

the military civilian relations in this country which is one of the bed rocks of our government and you know, here the cynic in me is speaking ahead more to do with that, but you could be right though. a move like this, any kind of troop reduction is in the works for months. it takes a long time to in the meantime, as it's getting ready lots and lots of people see it so there are opportunities. >> you've just written a book called the stakes. was then it's all on the line notth just the presidency, but e country is on the line. explain. >> fundamentally right now, i think the two big issues of this election, every election has a lot of issues that to biggest ones are stacking, burning, and looting american cities in the covid lockdown punishing our

economy. it's clear wherely biden is. he's for the mob and he's for the lock down and it may sound harsh to say he's for the mobs what you can only go outut there and condemn violence very blandly, you can't call out core democratic supporters and he can't even criticize these incredibly effective with villas mayors who won't even enforce the law or governors that won't enforce law but in sometimes take to twitter intake to the airwaves and egg them on. biden has also setme a couple times that if he gets in there is president and the experts whoever they are saved to him welcome that we need more lockdown he says i'll shut the country down. donald trump is on the other side and both of those two issues. he's made that play all along. he definitely made it plain at the rally some parts of which i saw in south carolina. then there are his core issues that he ran out in 2016 where they are diametric opposites trump wants more immigration restriction, he wants a wall, he wants to clean up the gratian policy and reform the system so that we are putting americans first.

he wants to readdress our trade imbalances, get tougher with china. biden has been in the pocket of china for a long time. and then finally, war, which you've already talked about. they couldn't be more different there. >> we have a president who has just helped broker a historic peace deal between the uae and israel, obama blinked and he got a nobel peace prize, it's a joke. and this is historic and it's a collective yawn for most in the media, but they're coming into town next week and they will celebrate that.he he's a peacemaker, and people don't like his tweets, but i'd much rather have a peacemaker who tweets some rough stuffho tn ahu warmonger who is hugging cay with all the constituents all

the time. michael, your book is fabulous everybody should go out and get it. thank you so much. >> thank you. >> for the last four years, he rolled pro trump gear at the end he did it without any incidents. in fact, he often got complement from coworkers, but it all changed last week when the company who, by the way, is the sole builder of u.s. aircraft carriers decided that hat would no longer be tolerated. after he refused to remove the trump 2020 had before a safety meeting, he was fired. the company told him he had violated its policy on campaigning, but he wasn't campaigning, he was just wearing a hat. dave sunderland joins me now. dave, it's great to see you tonight. is it true you wore a trump hat of this type to work every day for four years without any controversy? what changed? >> i really don't know what changed. d ye, i did wear it every day for four years. i might have missed a day oruc two, but pretty much for four

years i wore it. either a keep america hat, trump 2020, something. and all of a sudden, it is not allowed. >> your company claimed it was not a policy to attack anyone's particular viewpoint. we tried to get a statement from them tonight to clarify things and they said the following. we have policies and procedures to eliminate anything that could negatively impact teamwork. these long-standing policies and procedures are designed to minimize disruptions and allow our work teams to doing job safely, efficiently, the procedures are not to any election or candidate. but, dave, they wouldn't actually point us to a specific policy. they kind of just issued the fact that there is a policy, so do you feel like you were treated fairly or targeted because of your trump views?

>> i feel like they are stepping on a first amendment right here. it may not be what they liked, but they shouldn't be able to pick and choose opinions somebody has. >> have you seen other coworkers where other insignias, or mottos that have a political message of any type? >> i've seen black lives matter masks. i haven't really seen any biden stuff, but i have seen in 2016 i saw the hillery t-shirts. there were, obama t-shirts everywhere. >> apparently that was tolerated. >>at yes, it was. >> dave, we will keep trying to get answers from newport news. they certainly make a lot of money from u.s. taxpayers, not

sure why they for the treatment here. >> demand that witnessed joe biden up close for six years when he was vp is speaking out about the decline of joe biden. his former stenographer mike mccormick joins us exclusively with all the details. don't miss this. with all the details. don't miss this.

>> for six years my next guest, mike mccormick, was at joe biden's side as his stenographer, transcribing the former vp's every word. he was present anytime the former vp gave speeches, met with foreign leaders, had off the record chats with reporters, you name it. in other words, he would have been a near constant presence during biden's time in the white house. given that personal relationship, it's all the more stunning to read what he wrote about biden in his new book. he's lost a step and he doesn't seem to have the same mental acuity ass he did four years ag. he doesn't have the energy, he doesn't have the pace of his speaking, he's a different guy. it's hard to quibble with the evidence. >> what holds this nation together and always has, has been an intuitive and expressed commitment to the constitution. to our institutions.

>> all men and women created by you know the thing. you know the rapidly rising in with, i don't know. >> joining me exclusively is mike mccormick, biden's formerer stenographer and author of biden unauthorized. mike, what troubles you about where biden is now versus where he was just four years ago in that clip that we played from 2017, i believe. he does seem just to the casual observer, quite a bit different. >> laura, thank you for having me on. and the title of my book is joe biden unauthorized and the 2020 crackup of the democratic party. i'll get to the second part of the title later.

joe biden is a different guy than he was. he doesn't have the same vitality. i listen to he spoke, i worked as a stenographer in the white house for 15 years. and started in the bush of ministration in 200 to i worked for the obama administration and i worked one year for president trump, so i'm not a political appointee, i have sort of across-the-board perspective and because of that, i'm kind of a neutral observer, that's what you wrote the book is because i saw and understood as joe biden was running for president, ther was a lot of things i saw that america needs to know. what i didn't know when i was writing the book was how far he'd slipped until i saw how he'd'd become this year's performance and debates was pretty low quality. when i saw him do his speech at the democratic national convention, that wasn't the joe biden i knew. that guy was reading from a teleprompter almost verbatim and he's never done that. it was a 25 minute speech. a 25 minute speech would get him warmed up in the past.

>> i want to show everyone biden, now just from last week end. watch. >> you know, it used to be a basic bargain in the country, i think it's really important, it's that somehow get that back on. limiting obama care in the middle of a pandemic. >> that is kind of a hodgepodge there, but with the joe biden of three or four years ago havee that much difficulty just reading from a teleprompter? sometimes they go down and it's frustrating, it's happened to me before, but is there something else going on? >> there is something else because he would never read from a teleprompter.el he is the guy that would walk out, take his speech and make a big joke about how his speechwriters worked all night on the speech and he would throw it away in the air and just say i'm going to tell you what i know, what i think from hisin heart or from his gut.

he doesn't have that heart of gut anymore. he's trying to work as joe biden off the teleprompter and that's not joe biden, that's it shell of his former self it. >> he also likes to kindaa portray himself as a president who would stand up to russia. watch. >> think about what is done, thk done damage it's done to us internationally. >> pruden doesn't want to need to be president because i know him and he knows i know him.ow he's spending a lot of money for these bots to try to undermine me. >> in your book you describe a time when biden was humiliated by putin, tell us about that. >> it was 2011 and it was the only trip he ever took to moscow, he took it early in the obama administration as kind of a back up to what hillary clinton and barack obama had done for their resets, and it

was his chance to have a big shot at puten. he made a big deal out of his background in russia and all the times he's been year, and puten just reeled him in like a fish in a boat. he knew how to bait the hook, he baited the hook by telling joe biden look, you did a great job you were here before, tell us about it and he started talking and talking and talking and all of a sudden off go the lights off goes a microphone and he is left speechless. imagine that, joe biden speechless and publicly humiliated. here. there was a press guy who wrote about it in a press pool port but for some reason it never got broadcast back your. there were press in the room from reuters and ap, they didn't report on it. there were moscow-based, so for whatever reason they didn't see it as important.t. i couldn't believe it. a that was one of the reasons i wrote the book because after he did this, he basically got body slammed by vladimir putin.

he did exactly what vladimir putin wanted him to do and started trying to promote the russia ascension to the russia world trade organization. >> meanwhile, they claim that trump is somehow imprudent pocket? cki'm sorry, as biden would say come on, man. why is kamala harris telling a man accused of felony sexual assault that she is proud of him? ahead we are going to show you how intimidation from blm has produced a troubling byproduct for the left. deeply flawed heroes. we will explain in moments.

>> really, wonderful. they are an incredible family. what they've endured, and they just do it with such dignity and grace.enen they're carrying the weight of d

lot of voices on their shoulders. >> why aren't her comments receiving more scrutiny? what she called an incredible family includes jacob flake sr. and remember, his facebook page replete with bigoted statements. blake posted disparaging comments about jewish people black trump supporters, and said he was with louis farrakhan with 100 percent. kamala harris went on to praise jacob blake jr., cnn covered it this way. >> there were just moments according to the lawyers between kamala harris and jacob blake jr. where he told her that he was proud of her, and she told him how proud she was of him. >> there are legitimate questions and concerns over the

use of excessive force by these kenosha officers, but should kamala be proud of jacob blake? proud? this is a man accused of breaking into a woman's home and violently assaulting her sexually.o he also reportedly stole her car, and then returned again to harass her. isn't she supposed to be all about women's rights and safety for women? due to all of this, he wasn't allowed in kenosha, which is why police showed up to arrest him in the first place. joining c me now is random tatum the former founder of the tatum report.com, like i said, you can impose police conduct in these kinds of incidents, while also not heaping praise on the alleged victim. >> these people are fake, they are dirty politicians, everybody is dirty as a sock lift on skidrow for a week. there is no way in the world you can get out here and advocate for women, get out here and advocate for rights in america but you're supporting a flat out

criminal. he is a criminal. when he got caught, the police came to the house, he had one cop in a headlock, he got tased twice. he went to the card to retrieve a knife or. they support some of the this gambia's dirtiest people in our society and they wonder why people don't support them. i can't see anybody advocating for kamala after her statements. >> how is any of this good for hard-working african-american single moms, trying to support their families in a very difficult time, when criminals in some cases are elevated especially those who sexually assault women? i mean the democrats are forever telling us that they are better on the women issue, on the women issue, they're always proo women except when the politics are inconvenient. this one takes the cake. >> these people are bad at

lying. the democrats come out every year and they talk a big game but they never do anything positive for anybody in the black community. i don't understand how any black person would support any of them. this is what i think it does to the black community as a whole. it puts us at a deficit because these are not positive examples of black people in america. these are the criminal element of the black community. there are black people out every day doing what they're supposed to do, progressing in life, and they're not being represented. that's a shame that they can't see eye to eye on what's really going on in the black community and where this support should be coming from. >> well said. this follows perfectly with what you just said because the leadership, the entire leadership of rochester police department resigned today after all of these days of violent protests, the chief declared in a statement as a man of integrity, i will not sit idly

by way outside entities attempt to destroy my character. and suddenly the mayor tries to paint this as a positive development, watch. >> while the timing and tenor oe these desert resignations is difficult, we have faced tough times before. i truly believe, that we will get through this. i can assure this community that i am committed to instituting the reforms necessary in our police department. >> brandon, is she in the back pocket of blm? is that what the reforms mean? >> she has to be. it made no sense, what reforms is she talking about? you have the rioters out here bludgeoning people confronting people, and a racist manner. this isn't just them confronting people on regular issues, they are going after white people.

these are the things that the blm people claim their champions against what have happened to black people in the past. they're doing the same things today. these politicians are so fraudulent, i don't understand how people can vote for her when she doesn't have a backbone to stand up for what's right. you can walk and chew gum at the same time. heyou can advocate for change, t you can also call out the bad paired. >> and everybody should also know as a side point, but significant, the police chiefte and rochester is himself black. so he has seen it all. and i have to say, i can't blame any of these police officers. there like you want to run this? go ahead, ms. mayor. over the weekend blm agitators stepped up their tactics where they harassed and threatenedd restaurant goers in pittsburgh and has we discussed earlier rochester, a violent days following violent days of blm demonstrations over the death of prude. in the wake of all this

in the wake of all this, my next guest is focused on what black lives matter isn't talking about, more than 50 minority children, most of them black, who have been murdered in 2020. that number continues to climb just last night an eight -year-old girl was killed in chicago.er host of the informed dissent podcast joins me now. should blm ever attain political relevance? if y they ignore these young victims that you brought to light? >> never. blm is a toxic fraudulent organization and peoplefo just need to get on board with that and understand what they actually stand for. how can you stand for black lives, and not go advocate for the most innocent black lives among us. we are talking 54 kids, age 12 and younger that have been killed this year in street violence, and there is for more outrage when a criminal who

resists arrest gets arrested and chopped by police. there is almost no national outrage just for the collective of the 64 kids. when you have an organization that says we champion black lives, it's hard to take that seriously. >> i am looking at the pictures of these children, they are just beautiful, sweet little angels. it is a heartbreak. anyone watching this, you have to be moved. that goes to the heart of what we have raised before on the show is that corporate money millions and millions and millions of dollars professional athletes throwing their support behind this organization with apparently benevolent intentions, but what does that achieve? >> and who receives justice? i mean what are we achieving here? in looking at these pictures, as

a parent, just going through these stories and reading the different go fund me stories from the family members, it is just heartbreaking. and to have this kind of idea where we need to push for police reform, and that needs to be a priority, and then we have all these children being killed inll street violence, it makes no sense to me. >> thank you so much tonight and thank you for what you're doing to raise awareness about this issue. why has there been an explosion of false covid positive test at late, and how long has it been going on?si my medicine cabinet has answers and some breaking news on the vaccine front is moments away.

>> we see the headlines every day and explosion of covid cases at colleges and among athletes, but there are serious reasons to question the reliability of the testing that is driving all of this hysteria. at the university of arizona, covid 19 retesting found 15 positives false tests in one day of testing. the university also admitted that the faulty tests inflated the number of student athletes who tested positive by 600 percent.

now is the cardiologist of colleges and ceo, also with me is dr. harvey rich, profession or of epidemiology at the yield school of public health. how widespread do you think these false positives might be? >> good evening, laura. don't really know the how widespread. i know that there was a lab in massachusetts that had a problem with false positives and found in its analysis a few hundred of them. it's hard to tell because theypl are so complicated, thet equipment that is used that it's hard to tell whether the supplies were bad or if the equipment had a fault or some other reason. tthere is a dozen different ways that false positives could occur. to get the question as how widespread, and how may it have affected public policy decisions including at the college level.

dr. fauci said this today about when we might get back two normal. >> we will not really return with ease to a degree of normality that we all seek in till we do get a safe and effective vaccine. i believe we will have that by the end of this year, the beginning of next calendar year 2021. >> he had a setback with the trials, but does there need to be a vaccine for america to be america again? >> i think the short answer is no. we see obviously in places like new york and even arizona that herd immunity is taking place. right it's not about masks, it's about the healing condition, the naturally responding to a virus attenuating, and a vaccine is probably not going to have sufficient safety data by the time it is ready for it to really matter.

vaccines for corona viruseste are notoriously difficult, we've tried for a decade to do this and there's a reason why it hasn't occurred yet. it's unlikely that we will have a safe and effective vaccine that people will take voluntarily by the end of the year because it simply takes time to collect that data. >> you've written extensively about hydroxychloroquine and it continues to be dismissed by i journalists over at cnn. there was a new study that came out from spain from washington examiner, acute respiratory infections may improve with regiment of hyden vitamin d3. only two were admitted to an intensive care unit. what of this?

>> the interesting thing is that in older people, in spain, and here too, people tend to be vitamin d deficient. it's not life-threatening, but the vitaminng d levels are low. vitamin d is beneficial for the immune system and needs to be in the normal range. supplementation in reasonable amounts as a good idea. what they did is they gave a big flash of vitamin d to supplement it into the normal range very quickly. that's what made the other stuff work well. >> we don't have time, but andrew cuomo actually tried to blame donald trump today for covid 19. no joke. gentlemen, thank you so much. coming up, something you will never see happen at a biden rally. the next bite is next.

all my years of covering politics that i have ever seen a crowd or heard a crowd chanted

"we love you" to a candidate as they did tonight in north carolina. a big crowd, and before that trumper's and palm beach, florida, held a boat parade and support of the president's reelection. a similar scene from california to texas, even new jersey. pretty stunning. that's all the time we have tonight, shannon bream and the "fox news at night" team take it all from here. shannon, i hope you had a great labor day weekend. >> shannon: i shannon: a critical battleground state of florida but i asked 0 political questions. it was only do you have some suntan lotion. that was the only question. good to see you. breaking tonight african-americans across the country the latest casualties of