on this awesome book. that is the story, happy in a hurry. thursday night, october 1st already. i will be back here with you tomorrow night, have some peanut butter pie! bye-bye. >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight," if you been watching the news, most prominent journalists went on the four white supreme minutes. they are highly agitated, why are they so worried? you know. a white supremacist mobs burned our country down. they spent the summer torching buildings and shooting people in minneapolis, kenosha, portland, seattle. it was immersed, worst domestic terrorism in 50 years and white supremacists did it. we better find them, check under the bed. that was a joke, obviously.

though not every reporter got it. some of them actually believe their own propaganda. if they are too dumb to operate an easy path, but they are telling you the news. it's a problem. let's hope when this revolution does end, someone fixes our newsroom. in the meantime, consider why their bosses are demanding they tell you something that is so obviously dishonest. think hard. why do people lie? why do you live? you lie when you're caught doing something you don't want to admit you've done. i didn't eat you oreos, i'd done like bobby did. the latitude to divert attention from your own crimes. that's what's happening, here. the summer, a political organization aligned closely with the democratic party wrecked our city. at this is black lives matter. here are what they did.

>> tucker: you don't have to guess about who did all of what you just saw, this wasn't exactly a stealth operation. the rioters proudly announced who they were, and what they wanted. just a few weeks ago, a guy with a not very subtle tattoo on his neck assassinated a trump supporter in orland. in kentucky, a man who promoted propaganda on social media tried

to murder two police officers. in chicago, blm activists supported looted as a form of reparation. >> people in the city are struggling through pandemic. i don't care if someone decides to loot a gucci or a macy's, or a nike, because that makes sure that person eats. that makes sure that that person has closed. i make sure that that person can make some kind of money, because the city doesn't care about them. that is reparations. >> tucker: yeah, that's reparations. cleaning up the nike start. no matter what they're telling you, blm is not a mainstream organization. to just five years ago, the democratic party acknowledged that. in the fall 2015 an internal memo described blm as a radical movement. not to lie, dozens blm activists stormed the stage at a bernie sanders event. they chanted, if i die in police

custody, burn everything down. the next month, they stormed another sanders rally. they seized his microphone and denounced the attendees as racists and white supremacists. you may remember it, it was scary at the time, including to democrats. they asked white sanders didn't have secret service protection. if these people were so extreme, they regarded bernie sanders as a. there was no reasoning with them weird there was no point. and now the democratic party embraces blm. they incorporated talking points directly into their product platform the summer great if you didn't care much about that in news coverage of the convention, just like you probably didn't hear anything about kamala harris' speech on the naacp this friday. if they didn't have time to tell you about that. there were too many rioting white supremacists to hunt down, that's a shame. you should know a lot more about kamala harris. a lot more. she is 22 years younger than

joe biden's. so if joe biden wins next month, at some point, possibly sooner than we expect, kamala harris will controlled the white house on the government. that is a concern because so few people in the democratic party, certainly at her level, have pushed blm's message more aggressively than kamala harris. here she was on friday. >> black lives matter has been the most significant agent for change within the criminal justice system because it has been a counterforce to the force within the system that is so grounded in status quo, and in its own tradition. many of which have been harmful and have been discriminatory. >> tucker: we are quoting, black lives matter has been the most significant agent for change within the terminal

justice system. that was a compliment. she was praising them as she said that. what kind of change is blm pushing for? what is their prescription for changing our justice system? we could tell you, but maybe you wouldn't believe us. so instead, we're going to play a tape from patrice culler, one of the founders of blm. here is what she said the summer. >> until they become signatory to legislation that eliminates the federal government's ability to give multimillion dollars to military and police forces, dismantle policing like ice and border patrol and the d.a., and the use of surveillance systems using to target protesters, the democratic party of today will be remembered as a party of complicity. >> so dismantle i.c.e. and the dea. that means no more drug

enforcement, no more border enforcement. that's the change kamala harris is endorsing. we are not making it up. we just showed you the tape. if she said that on friday. not 30 years ago in college. on friday. of eliminating law enforcement agencies, entire federal agencies may be a lot of things, it is not a moderate position. it is a radical position. kamala harris is a radical person. it doesn't matter what she seems like, it doesn't matter how soothing her words may sound, if you listen to what they mean, they are radical. here is kamala harris on friday describing the founders of blm. >> nothing that we have achieved has been about progress has come without a fight. nothing that we have achieved in our country that has been about progress, particularly around civil rights has come without a fight. >> tucker: so she used one word twice in that clip. it was fight.

kamala harris likes people who fight. she likes fighting. most of all, they like to fight. she is right. patrice colors does like to fight. she is a self-described market's list. she's not afraid to defend looting on television. she's happy too. watch her do it. >> the protest has been overwhelmingly peaceful, but there is a media focus on looting. >> we are very obsessed with property damage. property damage is seen as sort of like the pinnacle of destruction and violence, and we rarely hear the media focus on police viles violence or terry. >> tucker: it's someone likes to fight. in any other year, the vice president candidate who openly door stemmed from the stage, that would be a major national scandal. it might be enough to get kamala harris bounced off the ticket.

not this year, not in 2020. no one is saying the word about it. they are hoping we won't notice. the founder and president of the woodson center, happy to have you one. thank you for joining us. we both agree that these prescriptions are poison and counterproductive, but i'd love to hear it -- and i think our audience would do, your prescription for what we should do. so if you were running, if you are in kamala harris' place or joe biden's place, what would you say to the country about what we need to do to fix our problems? >> first of all, i would say molly harris should lead by example. one of the things i would recommend, the way she talks about reimagining the police, she should take steps to dismiss her security detail and instead hired social workers that she goes around. the one that is the best suggestion i've heard. did you think she will do that? >> i will recommend, maybe she's

watching and she believed that. people like her, they do not have to live with the consequences of their advocacy. particularly, when they have to do -- are vilifying the police and as a consequence, the people who are suffering most in this struggle are the people who they claim to represent and seek justice. low income blacks in these communities are one. if i was the vice president, what i would do instead is first of all, stop the money going to black lives matter. have these corporations investing in rioting, investing in murder and looting because the more they do it, and what they also should stop doing is vilifying the police. the more the police are vilified about patrolling aggressively in these black neighborhoods, the higher the murder rate goes up. also, if police resources are

drained off by l.a. rioters downtown, that's very dangerous for people in those communities. also what we've got to stop doing is black children are dying in record numbers on our streets and in the classrooms -- dying intellectually by admitting these negative messages about that hating their country. they live in a country that hates them -- what we are doing at the woodson center is that we are reaching out to communities and identifying people with the concerned, black men who are in those same zip codes who have the trust and confidence of the people, and they are creating islands of peace. also, another group that needs to be and is the hundreds and hundreds of black mothers were suffering these losses. they are coming to us and saying, we want a voice. we are opposed to elimination or

reducing police. we want the police to cooperate with us in the protection of them. tucker, what we've gotten to do is we really got to shift the paradigm and recognize that people should be agents of their own uplift. instead, we are investing in people who are destroying our cities. if there is no such thing as institutional racism. at the people who use that as an excuse and presents that as a problem, they need to be challenged to answer, tell me what institutional racism looks like. what is your remedy, how would that remedies save lives in these communities from those black mothers, i know one who has lost all four of her sons. if there's a study that they died within three years because of the grief that they suffered. they are silent sufferers, and we need to put them at the

center of our solution, and listen and support to them, and learn from these neighborhoods healing agents what should be done, and stop the hustle. stop the hustle. black elected officials are using race so they can avoid answering the question, if racism were the culprit, wire black children and low income black people being destroyed in institutions run by their own people. who has hired these police chiefs or racist props over the last 50 years? who hired them? >> tucker: stop the hustle. stop the radicalism. >> stop the radicalism. >> tucker: thank you for joining us tonight. last time we told you one of the main takeaways from the debate is that calling joe biden senile, he probably is, will not win the election. now, the vice presidential debate is coming up, next

wednesday we will take a much closer look at kamala harris' past and her record up until now. we will continue on that tonight. at the top three things mike pence ought to highlight about harris as they face off next week. great to see you tonight. >> good to be with you, tucker. >> tucker: what do you think vice president pence ought to address with kamala harris? >> i would hit her on a couple of things. i would go right at some of these far left schemes. did you really think we should pack the supreme court? do you believe we should give statehood to washington, d.c., and puerto rico? these are all schemes to lead to one party rule, of course democrats thinking it would be them. i would ask her, do you really believe we should decriminalize all illegal border crossings, and do you really think it's a good idea to give health care to illegal immigrants? i would also try to pin her down on, do you believe in the green

new deal and its entirety, because we know it is coercive socialism, it will only be implemented in its entirety through coercion. there is another term, it's called communism. i would start there, i've got a few more ideas that you just need to keep pounding to illustrate, again, she was bailing out the rioters and looters up in minneapolis this summer. actually raising money to bail them out of jail, and then i would conclude, will you renounce antifa and to the marxist and all of its destructive ways? put her on the mark, do not let her off of it completely pin her down and get her to either deny or accept all of those points and then move on. >> tucker: and none of that seems far-fetched to me. if this doesn't seem hard to predict if you're going up against someone in a political race, you would say, these

people have positions unpopular with the public, why not let them know they have these additions? i see these idiotic messages from trump campaign attacking biden for voting for the crime bill that most people like. why don't they mention that they want to add puerto rico and d.c. each of the union? >> this is obvious stuff. i would remind people that a poll showed nearly 70% of the american people are opposed to packing the supreme court. anytime you have a 70% issue, that's a winning issue. it does highlight how radical she is. again, i think i'm stating the obvious. if her record shows she is one of the most liberal members of the senate, just go through her voting record. it show people what she is doing -- i told my wife, i would not be surprised -- god forbid joe biden wins, i would doubt he would serve out his first term, i think kamala harris would replace him as president before the first term would expire. that's how serious this is,

because she is truly the real presidential candidate on the ticket. >> tucker: i don't have the polling right in front of me, but i don't believe that most people want to see d.c. -- may be the most mismanaged eddy in the world, in this hemisphere, become a state? it's insane. who supports that? >> we both know, the constitution for them is a series of suggestions that they can either accept or reject as they so choose. if this is all the pursuit of power. a political power to implement the far left agenda. you get two more liberal senators from d.c., two more liberal senators from puerto rico, then you filibuster -- that's another thing that tends to push. do you think it's a good idea to remove the legislative filibuster from -- which can destroy any minority right in that body? that is --

you've got all three branches of government controlled by one party. >> tucker: not a good idea. good to see you. too much power, we will have more on kamala harris in the vp debate next wednesday. after the break, we will talk to the -- daniel cameron. you may have seen him on television recently giving some powerful speeches. he's ready to verify some of the details on the breonna taylor case. we'll be right back. i'm hearing the most awful things, people shouting at me. it's ok. when you live with schizophrenia like us, it can feel like you're living in a different world. you should definitely talk to your doctor and ask about fanapt.

ok. fanapt is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. in clinical trials, fanapt significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo. cynthia, are you ok? i feel like everyone's out to get me. fanapt may change your heart rhythm which could elevate risk of sudden death. your doctor will consider this when deciding among treatments and may prescribe another medication first or may instruct you to take a smaller dosage of fanapt. remember you're not alone, there is help. call 8557 fanapt

>> tucker: protesters so ongoing in kentucky, on a case last month. back in march, breonna taylor's boyfriend open fire after a competent the apartment with a search warrant. he was endangering others. the police officer had been shot when he did that. after the verdict came out, they apparently shot to officers in louisville. one of those officers called

wednesday saying, hate and violence progresses nothing. blm's leaders and the news med media, agree with that message. if they insisted that they have somehow betrayed the black community. attorney general is about to respond on this show and a moment. at first, here with those attacks against him looked like. >> he is a republican through and through. eco-he is not -- since they can't speak for kentucky, because he is up there with a black face, he does not speak for all of us. >> but i saw this morning was bull connor speak in 2020. you are right, unfortunately, it was being -- -- >> i'm so disgusted by this. i'm disgusted by cameron's performance. i am so sick and tired of going

on here and performing for -- officer violence against black people, claiming their mamas and because he's a black man they care about it. >> tucker: those attacks are so cruel and so vicious it's unfair. we hesitated to air them again, we didn't want to -- daniel cameron. he asked us to because he wants people to see them. thank you so much for joining us. it's embarrassing to even play that before this interview. i have to ask, what did you think when you saw that? >> well, tucker, it is so unfortunate that because i have a different political philosophy and because of my role as the attorney general and at the special prosecutor in the breonna taylor investigation. because i led with the facts and the truth and had that lead to the conclusion, somehow i betrayed my race.

it is repugnant, it is so disappointing, but it's par for the course. anytime someone stands for the truth, and when that truth is different from a narrative that has been pushed by others, this is how they respond. if you look at my social media, you will see countless folks who have made similar statements and comments. i am here tonight to say that enough is enough. black republicans, folks that believe in the truth, that we are going to stand up. that's what i did in presenting all of the information to the grand jury and the breonna taylor investigation. at that is what i'm charged to do. it is my responsibility to be attorney general of the commonwealth of kentucky. that's what the citizens and stomach here deserve, that's what they elected me to do. a>> tucker: and god bless you for your calm and bravery. i don't the guy could handle it if i were you. i'm glad you can.

since you are here, and we've covered this case quite a bit, there's been a lot of competing stories about what actually happens. clear up for us, if you would, since no one was more involved in this venue. what misinformation is out there about the breonna taylor case? >> the biggest myth that is being promoted right now is the idea that one of the officers who was administering the search warrant in the morning hours at breonna taylor's apartment was shot by friendly fire, meaning child by another officer. i've taken a call in this a conspiracy theory. in order to believe this narrative that's been promoted in kentucky, you have to believe to defy physics and disregard the trajectory analysis. you have to believe that the officers standing outside of the apartment, shooting into the apartment that he had a magic bullet. if that bullet went through the apartment unit and then made a sharp turn left without any

obstruction or impediment to mess it up with the entry point of the wound that sergeant suffered. it is this silly notion, it's one of the biggest myths that has been promoted here in the last few weeks. before three weeks ago, before this defense attorney uttered this statement, it was a foregone conclusion that what happened that evening that breonna taylor's boyfriend fired a shot at the officers. if the officers responded and returned fire, justified in doing so because they had been fired upon. the tragedy -- i said that since the beginning. the tragedy is that breonna taylor was in the hallway as well and was hit. the tragedy doesn't allow for me to not present facts and truth. that's what we've done here. >> tucker: amen. that was exactly my read on it. it looked like a tragedy. everyone is sad that she died, but it doesn't seem like a

justifies violence in the streets. he said it's not justice for the mob to commit violence. you were attacked for saying that. what do you make of that response? >> there were a lot of people inside and outside. a lot of celebrities, a lot of folks that were either misrepresenting the facts because it was to their advantage, or didn't know all of the information. they made conclusions first, and then wanted to cherry pick will be facts to meet those conclusions. i don't have that luxury is being attorney general here in the commonwealth. my responsibility as to the truth and to be information, and then that is ultimately what leads to the conclusion. we presented all of the information to the grand jury. ultimately, we presented to them as well. the officers were fired upon and they were justified in returning the fire. we've obviously had a prosecution into a third officer that was there that night. i can get into the specifics, that is an ongoing prosecution.

again, a lot of folks had already made up their mind and you weren't interested in what the truth is. now, they are still trying to cherry pick so that they can fashion and narrative that meets their agenda and advances their own interests. >> tucker: i hope someday we can have dinner, i will ask you about the other prosecutors who have bowed to political pressure. i won't ask you on tv, it would put you in a bad spot. >> i will pick you up on that dinner. >> tucker: daniel cameron, attorney general of the commonwealth. thank you so much. >> thank you for having me. we won officials in new york city have released to date on just how many bars and restaurants may go under forever because of the lockdowns in response to the coronavirus. at those numbers will stun you, we will show you that, next. we put our arm around the veterans. when i think of the veteran out there that needs

to refi his home, he may want to purchase, we can help them and provide that financial solution for they and their families. it's a great rewarding feeling. everybody in the company, they have that deference and that respect and that love for the veteran that makes this company so unique.

>> tucker: when the

coronavirus arrived early this spring, our leaders basically responded by shutting everything down almost immediately. it was a hasty decision, but is taken many months to learn the details of its effects. what happened after we did that? now we know a lot more about the effects on small businesses in the city of new york. rick leventhal has details on that tonight. >> every day we hear reports on the number of coronavirus cases nationwide and state-by-state, detailed breakdowns and the rise and fall of infections, but we don't often hear about the impact of the shutdowns on local businesses until today, a new audit released by the new york state comptroller brings all kinds of bad news. half of restaurants and bars made close for good because of covid-19. most of them have been closed since march, most restaurants have survived because of carry out orders. only a 25% normal seating capacity. he comptroller says the industry

is challenging under the best of circumstances, many eateries operate on tight margins. now they face in unprecedented people that may force them to close properly. one-third to one half of the city's bars and eateries -- thousands of businesses could shut down forever costing as many as 150,000 jobs, most held by minorities. at this equals potential losses of billions in wages and more than ten billion in taxable sales. if they have extended outdoor dining year-round, but how many people are going to sit outside in new york city and the dead of winter? >> tucker: the implications are profound. rick leventhal, thank you for that. if you think about it for a minute, those numbers are hard to believe, but not everyone in new york city is giving up. one man opened a bar and restaurant in the city a month ago today, bill de blasio's government has done everything

they can to stop it, including banning for people to sit at the bar. the restaurant called festival is still open. he joins us tonight for an update on how he's doing. thank you so much or coming on. why did you do this? opening a restaurant in new york now, it seems -- >> tucker, a lot of these petitions were made at well be whole obefore the coronavirus. if this was two years in the making, i refuse to be negative on these sort of things. i refused to dwell on the negative, i believe in the power of community. i believe in the powers of new yorkers. cuomo, de blasio, they didn't stop the virus, new yorkers stop the virus. new yorkers will survive. >> tucker: i love that. do you have investors? do the stomach they agree, too? do you have anyone saying, that's a pretty brave time to open a restaurant?

>> i have such a strong belief in the people that i work with, from the mixologists to the shaft, front of house, back of house, dishwasher who reemployed who works his heart out because he needs this job. everyone needs this job. we are a family. this is even brought us closer together, in a neighborhood where there's not a lot of great options we are positively the best cocktail bar in new york city at this moment. >> tucker: i bet you 100% of the people watching right now are inspired by what you are saying. with the city government of new york inspired? have they encouraged you? >> absolutely not. i will say one thing, open dining, alfresco dining, is a wonderful idea. it should have been implemented long ago. why? the city gets a lot of money by charging bars and restaurants

cafe sidewalk fees, which was a normal license would have to apply for to spend tens of thousands of dollars every year just to use a small amount of sidewalk in front of your business. now, we can spread out. look, my business is lucky enough that we have a great landlord and we have a great sidewalk, we just put in another beautiful sidewalk garden, we seat a lot of people 12 or 6 feet apart. we will put a table anywhere on the sidewalk for you at your comfort level, because we are willing to go the extra distance. it has paid back in spades because the neighborhood has rallied around us. >> tucker: i bet they have. how many restaurants and bars has your zip code lost, would you say in the last six months? >> i would say half to 75% of the bars in my neighborhood, i also lived there, are gone. they are gone. if you a man, you are in for the

long haul. do you hear people say that new york is doomed, people are leaving, you are not leaving, obviously. >> absolutely not. let's be clear, the new yorkers are the ones who beat back this disease. new yorkers are responsible, resilient, healthy, strong people who wear their face masks, keep their distance, and to respect each other. i will tell you one thing that absolutely disgusts me about what de blasio and cuomo have it done. in new york we have something called 311. it used to be a great service, but now it's the tattletale line. anyone who has a problem with any other person can tattletale on them and the government will send its special enforcement agency of the mayor's office -- which just sounds terrible to me. >> tucker: you are living proof that new york is not lost decent, sensible, optimistic people still live there. godspeed, i hope you thrive. >> thank you.

my only question is, when are you coming for cocktail? >> tucker: i want to come now. i don't even drink, but i'll definitely be there. thank you. while, the center for disease control prevention steals billions from you. we sent the money for a specific purpose. we believe they do a good job, the cdc is the federal agency refund to handle public health emergencies like the pandemic we are living through. how are they doing? we have some details on how they are doing. it according to a senior and highly knowledgeable source we spoke to, many senior cdc scientists and analysts are refusing to go to work. they have been ordered to go to the office, they won't. doesn't seem like anyone has reported on this, but it is happening. what are they doing? they are political activists, spinning media outlets for

political effects. "the new york times" published a piece saying government officials are oversight for the cdc. it's part of the administration, it always has been. apparently the white house asked the cdc to ask about the mental health crossed of the coronavirus. at those costs that then profound. they also asked to incorporate data on coronavirus deaths under the age of 18. again, a totally fair question to the public. the cdc thought this was an outrageous request, releasing scientific data to the public? no way. that could hurt the biden campaign. they wanted instead to hide data showing that children are not actually dying from this virus because the more you are afraid you are ahead of the election, the better. what happened monday was not unusual. back in may, the cdc created restrictions of religious services, rejected by officials in washington, including the

director of the cdc. a new version was less restrictive of the ledger services because of the first amendment, because someone at the cdc went ahead and published the original unapproved document online anyway. when this was discovered, the employee said, it was within bounds to publish incongruen int guidance. no one was punished. something similar happened last week when the cdc posted and retracted an alert on transmission. if these weren't mistakes. although, that's how the media reported them. they were deliberate attempts to sabotage the oversight of elected officials of the cdc for political effect for the benefit of one political party. the people responsible for this should not be working from home, they should not be working for the pro-government period. this is what you're doing? we will continue to monitor the story. i'm next, a highly detailed book

about what's actually happening inside google, facebook, and twitter. the most powerful companies in the world working to change the election results. we will show you how they are doing it, next in the bay area, we believe in science.

traffic and air pollution will be even worse after the pandemic. that's why we support measure rr to keep caltrain running. which is at risk of shutdown because of the crisis. to keep millions of cars off our roads, to reduce air pollution and fight climate change. and measure rr helps essential workers like me get to work and keep our communities healthy. relieve traffic. reduce pollution. rescue caltrain. [all] yes on measure rr. but that's tough to do on a fixed income. i'd be hit with a tax penalty for moving to another county, so i'm voting 'yes' on prop 19. it limits property taxes and lets seniors transfer their home's current tax base to another home that's closer to family or medical care. being closer to family is important to me. how about you? voting 'yes' on prop 19.

>> tucker: it's it's a free country, if you're over 40. no one says that anymore. that silicon valley is a big part of the reason. check oligarchs do whatever they can to censor and humiliate anyone who challenges the approved position on all kinds of topics, the coronavirus lockdown, mail in ballot, can't criticize him. you've seen all of that. what are you not seeing? what are these companies doing internally to effects the way we think and vote? we have thought a lot about this, written a new book on it, deleted, big text battle to -- congrats on the book. >> think you took, i've been

following the activities of silicon valley tech giants for years now. i have no other way to put it, we are in an era of digital totalitarianism. we've allowed a handful of corporations to seize control of political discourse and therefore seize control of democracy. you don't have to take this for me, take it from my sources, the people who worked for google, twitter, and facebook. these are the people that have been interviewed for this book. they are so alarmed of what they've seen inside these companies, they put their own careers on the line to come forward and warn the american public about what's going on. if this is not just about people getting banned, we all know people get bands on social media. that is just the tip of the iceberg. the really terrifying stuff is what's going on behind the scenes. that's what these sources have told me about. i know were short on time, i will focus on just one example

that people need to know about. it's called the machine learning fairness. machine learning fairness. everyone needs to memorize those three words. i will tell you what it is briefly, this is big text attempt to merge the field of computer science on one hand, and a critical race theory on the other. critical race theory, tucker appeared at the same racist ideology that is being rightfully purged from the government by president trump is running rampant in silicon valley. it couldn't be more dangerous, because these people control the algorithms that are going to control every aspect of our lives. they control whose messages are allowed to be seen, whose political movements are allowed to go viral and gain momentum? even whose businesses are going to be successful, if you're on the tenth page of google search, no one will ever find you. people have this awesome power, which by the way it affects not just america, but so many other countries around the world. people who have this power of

the same people think they are the leading intellectual figures of her time. these people are crazy, and they are racists, and they are running the technologies that are running our world. that's where we are, that's digital totalitarianism. >> tucker: it machine learning fairness? i won't forget it. i hope you come back. it's a remarkable story, i appreciate it. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: a president trump and joe biden in the same room again, not at the same time. they were at the 75th out smith fund-raiser. it was a chance for them to poke fun at each other in person, what happened this evening? we will tell you, straight ahe ahead.

i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424.

>> tucker: this is a fox news alert, hope hicks has tested positive for coronavirus.

a long time on and off close aide of the president of the united states. if they were together yesterday in washington. no evidence of the president is sick. hope hicks is fine so far. one of the most decent and kind people in politics. it we will bring up a more we learn it. we told you the president and joe biden spoke at the annual al smith dinner. they spoke virtually, here's part of what happens. >> the original happy warrior, that's what he was. he was a happy warrior. i know it well, i consider myself to be a happy warrior, it's not so easy at this time. he spent his time fighting for working americans and battling the anti-catholic prejudice that you see even today coming out of the democratic party, anti-catholic bigotry has absolutely no place in the united states of america. >> live a life worthy of those that were lost. two stomach throughout my life

and public service, i've been guided by the tenants of catholic social doctrine. the only there was! at that's it for us, back tomorrow night, 8:00 "the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink.," sean hannity, right now. >> we echo your thoughts and prayers. for anyone who had to deal with the virus and families, thank you. welcome to "hannity." if the president the united states will join us live for an exclusive one-on-one interview, that is coming up earlier tonight. as tucker just mentioned, he delivered a speech at the al smith dinner where he defended amy coney barett from the despicable disgusting attacks on her faith. let's take a look at that part. >> to protect your god-given rights, i was recently honored to nominate one of our most brilliant legal minds, judge amy coney barett to the

united states supreme c