tv Tucker Carlson Tonight FOX News October 9, 2020 5:00pm-6:00pm PDT
5:00 pm
i'm honored that you're watching, be well. take care. that is "the story" for friday october 9th 2020 but as always the story continues, we will see you back here on monday night at 7:00 -- have a good weekend. ♪ >> tucker: just a few moments, will max speak to the president of the united states in his first on-camera interview since he was diagnosed with coronavirus last week. our own dr. marc siegel will interview the president about his condition and assess his health, that's all straight ahead. also, weather news tonight. hurricane delta has made landfall in southwestern louisiana, it's a category two storm -- we are tracking it and will have an update on that as well. good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight, for a guy who's been in politics all of his life, joe biden never learned to live very well. you think he would've picked up some flair over the years given
5:01 pm
the practice he's had, but no. if he still tells whoppers like a child like that insecure fat kid in his sixth-grade class who was always bragging about how his dad was a secret agent when actually he worked in insurance. there was a scary gang guy called corn pop, then i went to south africa to free nelson mandela from jail but a bunch of arrested me at the airport but i fought them off -- okay, you say to yourself. you're embarrassed for the guy, it's so transparent and dumb. but biden isn't embarrassed, he assumes you believe him, maybe he's so deep in his internal fantasy world he doesn't care what you think. either way, he keeps going, tall tale after a tall tale -- then i went to segregated black college, the guys there loved me. the whole thing is weird, it's a little sad. what's interesting are those moments in which joe biden doesn't lie, he decides to tell the truth in the face of criticism. that's not an easy thing to do for a man who's desperate to be loved, you have to ask yourself why is he doing it?
5:02 pm
it's happening right now -- it's interesting. repeatedly he's been asked in recent weeks whether he plans to pack the supreme court with partisan democrats if he's elected. the answer is obvious of course i would never do that, i'm not a radical, i moderate, i'm from scranton -- you can trust me. that's essentially the answer he is given on a bunch of different issues like the fracking ban or the green new deal. he used to support those things, now he claims he doesn't support them. he wants to win, he'll say anything. what's weird is that biden isn't trying to reassure you that he won't pack the supreme court. most americans don't want him to do that, they don't want to destroy an entire branch of government. again, biden is refusing to reassure them. packing the supreme court is the one thing joe biden is certain to do if he selected. listen to his answer from the question from yesterday, he doesn't even bother with the colorful story, here it is.
5:03 pm
>> you'll know my opinion on court packing if the election is over. it's a great question and i don't blame you for asking but you know the moment i answer that question, the headline and every one of your papers will be about that. >> tucker: we showed that clip to you last night, we showed it to you again because we wanted to make sure it was real and you want imagining it, it's that strange. his official articulated planned out scripted position is that voters are not entitled to know what he will do to their government if they elect him. if you think about it, it's itself a clear answer to the question -- it's not like he's ever thought about the subject of packing the court. he sat on the senate judiciary committee for decades famously and at one point the specific issue came up during a hearing. here's what biden said about it. >> president roosevelt clearly had the right to send to the united states senate a proposal to pack the court. it was totally within his right
5:04 pm
to do that. he violated no law, he was legalistic lee absolutely correct, but it was a bonehead idea. it was a terrible mistake to make and it put in question for an entire decade the independence of the most significant body including congress in my view, the most significant body in this country, the supreme court of the united states of america. >> tucker: it was legalistic lee correct, even then he was inarticulate. he did say clearly court packing is a terrible mistake, it would ruin the integrity of the judicial branch. that's not a profound insight, in fact it's the consensus view of historians and judges and has been for decades. once again, polls show americans agree, they oppose court packing -- it's not a partisan issue, it's common sense. the system has worked this way for hundreds of years -- let's not wreck it now. ruth bader ginsburg had the same view and she said so just last
5:05 pm
year. >> i have heard there are some people on the democratic side who would like to increase the number of judges. i think that was a bad idea when president franklin delano roosevelt tried to pack the court. if anything, it would make the court appear partisan. when we are in power, we are going to the number. >> tucker: so that's one of ruth bader ginsburg's final wishes that we are ignoring, apparently. it's pretty inconvenient nevertheless, how is the biden campaign explain this away? they put some thought into the question -- just before the last debate, the biden campaign got an intern to google up some facts to justify court packing. they came up with abraham lincoln a few minutes before kamala harris went on
5:06 pm
stage and she repeated it. >> abraham lincoln was up for reelection and it was 27 days before the election. a seat became open on the united states supreme court. abraham lincoln's party was in charge not only of the white house but of the senate. but honest abe said it's not the right thing to do. the american people deserve to make the decision about who will be the next president of the united states and that person can select who will serve for a lifetime on the highest court of our land. >> tucker: that's, let harris his version of american history -- it's not correct, not surprisingly. harris didn't grow up in this country, she moved to quebec when she was 12 and she didn't come back until after high school. if the question is what the capital of canada, it's a place called ottawa, kamala harris could probably tell you. but when it comes to
5:07 pm
abraham lincoln, she's completely at sea, none of what she said was true. michael burling gatewood know, he runs the lincoln studies department at the university of illinois springfield and he was baffled about what he saw. i never seen anything like that quote and all my 36 years of lincoln research. in fact he didn't immediately nominate a supreme court justice before the 1864 election because he couldn't -- the scent was not in session at the time and in 1864, there were fewer direct flights to washington, senators couldn't hop on a redeye from california to come in," things things moved more slowly. in december, the day after the senate reconvened, president lincoln immediately nominated a replacement to the court. kamala harris i's version isn't real. it's hard to believe but this is real, their plan to completely change our american form of
5:08 pm
government, that's close to happening, closer than a lot of republicans want to admit and you should be worried about it. for details on what they plan to do if elected, we are joined by justice jeanine pirro, the author of the book don't lie to me. thanks so much for coming on. how hard would it be if democrats were to take the white house and both chambers in congress for them to enlarge and pack the supreme court? >> i don't think there's any question that they want to pack the supreme court, the democrats when they can't get their way, they don't follow the constitution or the law, they have a hissy fit and decide how they are going to change things. they don't like the electoral college because that's how donald trump got elected so now they want to change it to the popular vote. what they intend to do and they are laughing at the people who support them and they are lying to the rest of us when they say "look, the issue over who the
5:09 pm
next supreme court justice will be on the ballot. that's not on the ballot, there is no supreme court justice on the ballots -- their intent is to pack the court so we have a supreme court of 11, 12, however many they need justices dressed in black who are nothing more than another legislative branch who will create the law of activist judges, whatever law they want to satisfy whatever hour it is they need. congress won't matter, the executive branch won't matter, they'll have the supreme court. they don't believe in originalist constitution, they will change everything. they will change america. this election is about everything being on the ballot and i got to tell you, what they are saying when joe biden says "i'm not going to tell you, i'll tell you after the election." they are disrespecting the people, they are disrespecting
5:10 pm
the process and they are disrespecting the american constitution. we are entitled to know, this isn't a game where they go backstage and high five each other and say we pulled the wool over their eyes. >> tucker: i'm concerned about changes to our institutions because you could see what might happen next. most of us go along with what the supreme court says because we believe it's a nonpartisan body whose only job is to interpret the founding documents, the constitution. if we start to believe it's just another group of politicians, why would we obey its dictates? >> we wouldn't, it would be seen as another partisan branch of government that is not elected but appointed by the people who are in power. this would be to take down of america, the breakdown of the system. the constitution doesn't matter anymore. the first amendment, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, we sought in the pandemic, the
5:11 pm
second amendment kamala harris says she can take away your guns, confiscate them. is anyone surprised they would try to change the supreme court as well? they have an agenda and it's not the agenda that our founding fathers had in mind. >> tucker: it's too radical. judge, thanks so much for that. we're going to hear from the president and his first on-camera interview since he got sick last friday emma but at first denied hurricane delta has just made landfall in the southwestern part of the state of louisiana, our fox chief meteorologist has a report for us. >> absolutely incredible to have two landfall and hurricanes in the exact same area just in a matter of six weeks. the hurricane that made landfall weeks ago was hurricane laura, the strongest when we saw this year, it's done incredible damage around the lake charles
5:12 pm
area. another landfall from another hurricane, this one made landfall an hour ago and creole around 13 miles to the east of where or made landfall. it will move quickly towards the north throughout the overnight hours but take a look at this. incredibly active season, ten storms that made landfall in the u.s. this year, five of those as hurricanes and behind us, there's nothing big concerning that we are watching. we are heading toward the end of the season and hopefully we will continue to see things remained very calm. if earlier today, a category three storm and it moved over this cooler water and began to weaken a little bit and that's good news. as it pulls towards the north, you will see this rapid weakening but you will see a lot of rain. some spots, ten to makkah 12 inches of rain, wind around 80 miles per hour around lake charles, where we saw the worst of the damage amount hurricane laura, now a lot of
5:13 pm
people with tarps for roofs and you've seen that kind of wind. continues to pull out towards the north and northeast eventually getting out towards the tennessee valley, you'll see that tomorrow and towards the day on sunday. lots of rain ahead, lots of wind and hopefully this is our last storm we will have to deal with in this crazy 2020 season. >> tucker: thanks so much. the president joins us in just a minute for his first on-camera interview since he was diagnosed with the coronavirus, dr. siegel assesses his health.
quote
5:18 pm
♪ >> tucker: the president tested positive for the coronavirus, since then his public events have been canceled and he hasn't participated in any interviews on camera, now the president's physician says he's completed his course of therapy and can return to public engagement as soon as tomorrow. by any measure, it's been a remarkable turnaround. on saturday, we are hearing rumors the president is very sick, on monday he seemed himself. how did that happen? to learn more about the process of the president's recovery, our own dr. marc siegel spoke to donald trump today. it was his first time talking on
5:19 pm
camera about what happened. these are very unusual circumstances, normally we would send our camera crew but because his diagnosis was just a week ago, we had to rely on the white house camera team for that interview. dr. siegel interviewed the president from new york, here it is. >> president trump, welcome. this is not officially a televised but you probably realized i've done hundreds. i hope you will indulge me and let me be th you be the patienty be the doctor and i promise you know co-pay. >> president trump: sounds good to me. >> briefly, how are you feeling now? >> i feel really good, i feel very strong, i know a lot of people have had the covid or the china virus as i call it because it came from china, i feel really strong and a lot of people don't feel that way sometimes for a while afterwar afterwards. very good to. >> what about symptoms that you had last friday when you went
5:20 pm
into walter reed? what were the two most prominent symptoms that you had to? >> didn't feel strong, i didn't have a problem with breathing which a lot of people seem to have. i had none of that. i didn't feel very strong, i didn't feel very vital, i didn't feel like the president of the u.s. should feel. i knew there was something a little bit off and the doctors at walter reed were incredible, they came from johns hopkins and everywhere, it's good to be president, i guess. they were great people. if i would say more weakness than anything else. >> i have to tell you something confidentially, my patients never listen to me no matter how hard i try, they don't do what i say. did that occur to you where the doctors were telling you something and you were negotiating or did you just do what they say? >> i did negotiate but i have a lot of respect for these doctors, they are the best doctors in the world. i've seen the work they do in the military, people coming in
5:21 pm
so badly injured like you've never seen before -- i have a lot of respect. i really tended to listen but generally maybe i wouldn't but i did tend to listen to this gro group. >> when you were in the hospital, what was bothering you the most? what were you feeling? >> you were tired, it was getting to you from the standpoint, you didn't have that same energy level. my life is based a little bit on energy and you didn't have it. i don't know, it could have led to bad things from that point, i don't know but i got lucky with the certain medicine. it really was something, i took a certain medicine that was miraculous to me, i don't think it's just in the head, i really believe it worked. >> were you scared? were you frightened? >> i took the regeneron and
5:22 pm
eli lilly makes a similar medicine, you have the eli lilly version of it and within a period of 24 hours i felt very different, i think i could've left the hospital a lot earlier but it made a tremendous difference. markedly so. i felt very good. you would have sort of a sore throat to add to what we were saying but i felt really good after taking this for a period of time. it's a transfusion, not a shot. i'd like to send it to everybody, i said i'm going to send it to everybody that's got the problem and we're going to send it free of charge, including seniors of course. we're going to send it to everybody. >> did you want to leave the hospital earlier than they said? >> i did. they wanted to keep me from observation and make sure i was good, i was there for three and
5:23 pm
a half days, they wanted to keep me -- i wanted to leave after the first day, i really felt i was in not bad shape after the first day, i think i would've been in much worse shape had i not taken this medication. >> how long do they want to keep you, the doctors? >> i don't know exactly. i stayed for the time that they needed me and they've done a lot of tests, they've done tremendous testing and right now i'm medication free, not taking any medications as of probably eight hours, i medication free which frankly makes me feel good, i don't like medication. >> if you would feel comfortable, can you tell me a little bit about the tests you had in the hospital, did you have a ct scan, what did that show? >> they tested the lungs, incredible equipment at walter reed. they said you could leave your jacket on, that's the first time that's ever happened on, i said i'll take it off anyway if you
5:24 pm
want. they tested the lungs, they checked the lungs, they tested with different machinery, they have incredible stuff i've never seen before. it tested good, initially they had some congestion in there but it tested ultimately -- it tested good and with each day it got better. i think that's why they wanted me to stay. the ct scans were amazing, the equipment was incredible, i've never seen equipment like this before. >> tucker: we spoke to the president about his drive outside walter reed medical center to greet his supporters out front from a lot of blue checks on twitter were enraged by that, will make a show you how the president responded to their criticism next.
5:29 pm
5:30 pm
surrounding that debate just before the news broke that it won't happen at all. he also asked the president about his car right outside of walter reed, the one the media told you endangered his staff -- interesting. here is more of the interview with the president. >> could you talk to me about when you went outside and took a ride with ppe and what you were thinking when you did that? >> i had tremendous numbers of people, i could hear them from the hospital and i was way up high in this fortified military hospital that's built to the highest standard. through these powerful windows, i could hear people screaming and shouting with love, with real love and after two days i said i want to go out and say hello to the people and i went to the secret service and these are the people who are with me all the time and they said we have no problem. i said i just want to take a drive and wave. you saw what happened, it was a great display of love out there. i don't think there was one
5:31 pm
negative person and there were many people. i don't think there was anybody negative out there, they went crazy when they saw the band go by, the car go by. the people in were protected, heavily protected because at that time i guess i would've been positive -- they were very protected and they've been with me, they've been with me for a long time. i thought it was very important to show my affection for them. they were standing out there 24 hours a day -- you saw that. every time you would be on television you would see them in the background and i just thought i love the people -- i love the people of this country. i thought it would've been very disrespectful if i was there for three, three and a half days and these people are there standing late at night, i'm very glad i
5:32 pm
did it. >> mr. president, lessons learned from this from your own illness that you would apply to the shift, how you can apply it to other people who have covid-19 and how to prevent getting covid-19, lessons learned. >> such a great question, i think the biggest thing is i did do it early. i have such great access to medical. we have a white house doctor who is great and so many great doctors -- it's a lot easier for me than somebody who's -- who doesn't have access to a doctor so easily but we have them all over the white house, watching them every corner. i think very important for me was very early. as soon as i felt something and i'm thinking about it because i see what's going on and i have a lot of people around me even though this tremendous testing but a lot of people around me so i think about it and i know there's a danger but i can't be
5:33 pm
somebody who goes into a basement and hides in a basement the rest of my life. i'm running a country, the greatest country in the world. i think the big secret from me -- i got there very early, i think it would've gotten a lot worse, one of the doctors said he thought it would've gotten a lot worse. i think these medications, they are a lot better if you get them early than if you get them late. it will react probably better. i think going in early is a big factor in my case. >> dexamethasone, i've given it to a lot of patients, many, most have tolerated it well. it sometimes there's issues with anxiety or behavioral issues, that you have any problem with that? >> i didn't know i had it, i didn't know what it was but it keeps the swelling down of the lungs as i understand it. i tolerated it very well. i don't take it anymore, but it
5:34 pm
was pretty short-term during the course of the medicine, that was one of the medicines. i think i tolerated it very well and it keeps the swelling down. that's important. >> what are you taking right now as of today? >> i think nothing, we pretty much finished and now we'll see how things go -- pretty much nothing. we had our final doses of just about everything. the original transfusion, that's supposed to last for about four months, the antibodies. i think you're supposed to be protected anywhere from 2 to 4 months, maybe longer than that. >> are you going to donate your own plasma? >> i will, nobody asked me that question but i will if they want me to do it, i'd love to do it. >> i heard you said you were going to test again today, have you been retested? >> i have been retested and i
5:35 pm
haven't even found out numbers or anything yet but i've been retested and i know i met either the bottom of the scale or free. >> when is your next test going to be? >> probably tomorrow, they test every couple of days. it's really at a level now that's been great, great to see it disappear. >> i have a question and this is my own fantasy -- all of this back and forth controversy about the next debate. if you test negative and you said you wanted to be in person, how would you feel about a debate outside on miami beach? >> i'v i would have no trouble h it at all, we've had rallies outside, no problem whatsoever. outside is better than inside with this crazy thing that's gone on but i would have no problem with it. we've always have a problem with this commission, this commission has been ridiculous. who wants to do a debate on a computer? i don't. virtual debate -- you got to be
5:36 pm
there. we did great in the last debate, you have to be there, you have to see the person, you can't do it on the computer. besides that, joe has a tendency to get the answers and read them off the computer when he's asked questions. i would love to do it outside, it would be fine as far as i'm concerned. >> where do you think you got the virus come at what point do you think you contracted it? >> i don't know, they had some big events at the white house. perhaps there. i don't really know, nobody really knows for sure. numerous people have contracted it, but people up contracted it all over the world -- it's highly contagious. that's one thing you learn, this is a contagious disease. generally you get better from it but we also now have medicines that will help a lot. if you look at mortality rate, i think it's up 95 or 85%, i think you've seen that -- you pointed out to me. what we're doing now with the medicines and all of the things are incredible.
5:37 pm
especially younger people, i wish they would open schools, i hope they open schools, some of the states are closed and the cure is worse than the problem itself in many cases -- it's a terrible thing. >> final message from you to america about what they can learn from your illness and your recovery which many would say is inspiring -- a final message? >> i have such great respect for the doctors and labs, scientists, the people working on this, they're doing incredibly well. i have incredible respect and love for the families that have suffered so badly. this is something that came to us -- i won't be able to tell you yet, maybe at some point i'll be able to report what came to us but it came out of china, it shouldn't have happened, they should've never let it happen but they suffered 20 also, far more than people understand. this is something that should not have been allowed, they should not have allowed us to come out to the world.
5:38 pm
i have such respect for the people that have suffered and my sympathies to those families that have been so horribly hurt, just horribly hurt. again, the respect for the doctors and for the technicians and the scientists -- it's incredible because i've seen what they've done and it's incredible. the job they've done a short period of time over a six-month period mack, the job they've done is incredible and you'll see that very soon with the medicines and the vaccines. >> i really appreciate that last answer and the interview and i want to tell you how much it means to us that you appeared for your first on-camera interview tonight on tucker carlson tonight, thank you so much for joining me. >> thank you very much, it's my great honor. >> tucker: there is more of that interview, if you're interested you can catch it tonight on shannon bream's show, at 11:00 eastern on fox. up next, democrats said this
5:39 pm
5:42 pm
because it strengthens prop 13 for seniors, disabled veterans, wildfire victims, and family farmers. prop 19 also protects the right of parents to pass on the family home to their children at the current property tax rate. you worked hard for your house and you should be able to give it to your children without a tax penalty. that's why taxpayer advocates, firefighters, veterans, and small business owners are voting 'yes' on prop 19.
5:43 pm
traffic and air pollution will be even worse after the pandemic. that's why we support measure rr to keep caltrain running. which is at risk of shutdown because of the crisis. to keep millions of cars off our roads, to reduce air pollution and fight climate change. and measure rr helps essential workers like me get to work and keep our communities healthy. relieve traffic. reduce pollution. rescue caltrain. [all] yes on measure rr. the unfair money bail system. he, accused of rape. while he, accused of stealing $5. the stanford rapist could afford bail; got out the same day. the senior citizen could not; forced to wait in jail nearly a year. voting yes on prop 25 ends this failed system, replacing it with one based on public safety. because the size of your wallet shouldn't determine whether or not you're in jail.
5:44 pm
vote yes on prop 25 to end money bail. ♪ >> tucker: because apparently she doesn't consider the country unstable enough, nancy pelosi today announced legislation that would make it possible for congress to unilaterally take the president out of office under the 25th amendment to the constitution. that's the amendment that outlines the procedures for removing presidents who can no longer perform their duties as president. here's the interesting thing, according to nancy pelosi, legislation has nothing to do with donald trump. >> this is not about president trump. people face the judgment of the voters. it shows the need for us to create a process for future presidents. >> tucker: for future presidents, like let's say you elected some guy who was 78 years old and congress decided
5:45 pm
you could do the job so his vp had to be president -- scenarios like that. no matter what she's thinking of, nancy pelosi does seem like the wrong person to deliver a message about fitness for office, maybe you've seen her speak in public -- if you haven't, here's one example. nancy pelosi froze completely and rebooted live on air in the middle of an interview -- watch this. >> to be clear, you're not taking any arrows out of your quiver, you're not ruling anything out. >> good morning, sunday morning -- we have a responsibility, we take an oath to protect and defend the constitution. >> tucker: good morning, sunday morning -- if you were talking to someone who said that, wouldn't you check that person's vitals? wouldn't you say, i'm sorry, are you having a stroke? the anchor didn't say anything, he didn't want to man's plane so
5:46 pm
he didn't. the rest of the media reach to the same conclusion, they decided the safe bet was to agree with nancy pelosi. >> whether it's a side effect of the steroids he's taking as part of the coronavirus treatment or something else, donald trump it seems to be drifting further away from reality today. >> donald trump doesn't seem like a well man, i'm going to be blunt about it. >> as it steroids, a psychological issue? >> we do know he's taking a powerful steroid that can affect mood and judgment. you put all that together and you've got a president who is unwell physically come on well politically and on well emotionally psychologically right now. >> hopped up on steroids and rage tweeting and calling into his favorite channel rage interviewing. >> he's embarrassing to the people who support him. >> tucker: 2020, it's a horrible year in so many ways but it's also a truly hilarious year in so many other ways.
5:47 pm
here you have cnn which has its own weight lifting corresponded to a show at night who doesn't squats on tv and it screams at strangers on the street, threatens them but they are upset about the presidents freu, they may have to remove him -- it's also great. steve krakauer has been watching carefully, he joins us tonight. great to see you. they're very concerned for the president has been pumping too much iron in his basement and screaming at people in the hamptons, should they be? >> i don't know if don lemon is picturing donald trump in the white house with a syringe injecting into a bicep or something but he has the most commonly prescribed steroid in the country according to "the washington post" for rashes and allergic reactions -- this is not some freud rage happening. the biggest proof that this is completely ridiculous is has
5:48 pm
anything donald trump has done in the last seven days since his covid diagnosis any different from the donald trump precova diagnosis? rage tweeting? was he tweeting differently before? i don't know how they're coming up with this other than trying to find new talking points. >> tucker: we have an election in a little over three weeks, the country is volatile enough. we have violence in the streets, a pandemic -- it does seem like if you have a national audience you want to tell the truth and sometimes the truth is upsetting. you don't want to go out of your way to make the country more volatile and that scare people needlessly, that seems reckless to me. >> i think sadly that's what we've seen. i felt the pandemic in march would be the beginning of a lowering of the temperature in the media. certainly not in a very serious situation of the president of the united states getting hospitalized with the coronavirus, you think let's focus on the facts and lower the
5:49 pm
temperature, report to the public who is nervous about this instead you get people like asante group do, you worked with him, i worked with him, now he's on the air saying i think the president is sicker than the doctors are letting on. you think the president is sicker? why are you what you think? diagnosing based on an interview with what he's hearing, it sounds like he's sicker then you think, it's not based in fact. for a media that really likes to hold themselves up as very fact-based, this is one of the most important topics in the country right now, a very fact free. >> tucker: i have some alarmist unfounded opinions come i try to keep them to myself -- sometimes i sneak through. you have a responsibility to stay factual, they don't seem to feel that at all -- it's distressing. steve krakauer, great to see you tonight.
5:50 pm
according to a brand-new documentary, amazing documentary, ufos are simply real, they also have interfered repeatedly with the united states nuclear weapons capability. after the break, we'll talk to people who said they have proof of that, this is not on a responsible take, it is fact-based and it's pretty shocking, will next be right back. i am a good parent. jared? i'm hearing the most awful things, people shouting at me. it's ok. when you live with schizophrenia like us, it can feel like you're living in a different world. you should definitely talk to your doctor and ask about fanapt. ok. fanapt is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. in clinical trials, fanapt significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo.
5:51 pm
cynthia, are you ok? i feel like everyone's out to get me. fanapt may change your heart rhythm which could elevate risk of sudden death. your doctor will consider this when deciding among treatments and may prescribe another medication first or may instruct you to take a smaller dosage of fanapt. remember you're not alone, there is help. call 8557 fanapt
5:55 pm
5:56 pm
the documentary called the phenomenon, we learned that the feds are hiding more than we thought they were. >> all we are saying, nobody has to agree why it is they are. but shouldn't we at least be spending money to study all of this phenomenon? shouldn't we study the stuff? the answer is yes. that's all this is about and why the federal government all these years has covered up, put brake pads on everything, stopped. i think it's very, very bad for our country. >> are you saying that there is evidence that still has not seen the light of day? >> i'm saying most of it has not seen the light of day. >> tucker: as outrageous. it's a nonpartisan question, senate majority leader from nevada, democrat as there's ever been one. he said that ufos have repeatedly interfered with our nuclear weapons capabilities. where the ufos from?
5:57 pm
some workers told the filmmakers that the origins are becoming clearer. >> dr. has collected metal debris from ufo cases dating as far back as 1947. the experts are analyzing the state-of-the-art laboratory and he was astonished to find the composition was unlike any unknown metal. it's not natural, it is not natural to the materials that we have with us on the earth. >> tucker: physical evidence of extraterrestrial spaceships, not a big deal come out like the on mike pence's fo for head. unfortunately, we have a few minutes, but the director and producer of the film. christopher, former senior intelligence official from the department of defense and joining us tonight. first you will, thank you both are coming on in making the
5:58 pm
film, i want to ask the intern about the two strange things from the documentary. the question of the nuclear facility, how often do you think they visit and why? >> that's one of the big bombshells harry reid job during the production of the film that caught me off guard. it was the first time a government official of the magnitude and his level had revealed that the ufos were not only seen over super secret nuclear weapons facilities, but they were interacting and shutting on and off some of the missiles. he went as far as saying that if the president had called upon to launch the missiles in several locations, they could not have done it. the missiles were deactivated and this is also been happening in russia. we document those cases very thoroughly with high-level military officials testifying about those incidents.
5:59 pm
>> tucker: quickly to you, physical evidence of ufos, metal from the craft? where? >> well, my congratulations to james, this is the most informative and engaging documentary on the subject. because it is no longer theoretical issue as you observed, this is now the defense department confirming this is happening, congress is asking questions and asking for a report. people need to get a understanding and a context of the process and absorb this. in terms of the materials, there's private researchers and perhaps foremost among them the star of the academy that have the materials and are funding the research. if he's a particular tisccuielat so he sending it to peer review and multiple labs. but the gist is that those materials were engineered at an atomic level. it's a capability that we don't
6:00 pm
even possess and if they can prove that and demonstrate that, that will raise a lot of interesting questions. >> tucker: you think? you've been on it for a long time. thank you both, congrats on the film. have a great weekend, we will see you monday. ♪ >> sean: welcome to "hannity" on this busy breaking news. if joe biden and kamala harris, the radical left plotting for wt will be the single biggest power grab in modern american history. they will not be answering questions about any of it. talk about a lack of honesty and transparency. according to joe biden, you would the american people, you do not deserve to know his position. kamala harris' position on what our monumental issues like court packing, keeping the electoral college, statehood for d.c. and
344 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=8178575)