that is "the story" monday, october the 12th, 2020, very intense coming here with 22 days to go. to stay with us every night on "the story" as we continue the coverage for you. we will see you back here tomorrow night. good night, everybody. ♪ >> tucker: president speaking at a huge rally in florida tonight. cleared by two tests given the green light by his physician, president full of energy looking to monitor the rally. raking with any news that emerges. a good eating, welcome to "tucker carlson tonight," happy columbus day. you may have missed the first round of amy coney barrett's confirmation evening emac hearing. are they? it was bizarre. bizarre for this reason, none of the attacks on her and there's many of those had anything to do with the job that she's trying

to get. the supreme court exists only to determine whether the laws of the politicians right are consistent with the constitution of the united states. that's why we have the supreme court and the only reason we have it. supreme court justices do not make laws because they're not elected by voters. we don't let them legislate as a result and that's how democracy works, people who are alike to get to make laws. democrats would like to change that system. they understand congress is inherently small conservative body and congress is never going to change the country overnight and radical ways because voters do not want radical overnight change. they never do. if you're going to have a revolution and remake america, you're going to have to do it from above and imposing on people. the left would like to use the supreme court as their instrument to do that. it kind of super congress with lifetime tenure. imagine the power like that. nothing you cannot do.

once you understand that perspective, very much their perspective, today's hearing's made sense. democrats spent hours talking about the 2009 obamacare law and that goes back. if you're interviewing someone for whom the supreme court there's only one relevant question about obamacare. is it constitutional? that's all they consider, that's all they're supposed to consider, not how they feel about the law, not where it contorts with their personal values. is it constitutional? that was one of the few things democrats did not ask because they're not inserted whether or not it's constitutional. what they care about is power and amy coney barrett will diminish or enhance theirs. they understand the supreme court purely in political terms and not surprisingly, they conducted today's hearings like a campaign rally. health care for millions of americans at stake barked one single senator from california. pointed to another woman from laura, she will be unable to

afford the treatments necessary to survive. if amy coney barrett gets this job, it is curtain for laura. it democrats made that very same point as they had recently, obs or many will die. >> you know they're going to push through a justice who's been critical of a upholding the critical care act. >> there asking the supreme court to strike down to strike down the affordable care act. >> your nominations about the republican goal of appealing the affordable care act. the obamacare they seem to detest. >> they are deliberately trying to defy the will of the people in their attempt to rollback the rights and protection provided under the affordable care act. >> tucker: sounds like obamacare is going the way of acb getting on the courts. but it's not actually and that's the amazing thing, obamacare is not at risk.

there is no case pending anywhere in the country fo that would eliminate obamacare. they have no idea how amy coney barrett would rule in a case like that and again it hasn't. but most of all, democrats themselves publicly conceded that obamacare is a disaster. six of the ten democrats currently sitting on the judiciary committee, the same committee that convened today to consider amy coney barrett's nomination, six of the ten cosponsored medicare for all legislation. that legislation would have completely abolished obamacare. along with all private health insurance. kamala harris is one of the people who voted for that. yes, there's kamala harris today warning us the country will collapse if amy coney barrett goes to the hypothetical case to destroy obamacare which she herself voted to destroy. what?

it all seems kind of confusing. think about it for a second and it begins to make more sense. when you realize the goal is not to preserve obamacare, again, they voted to scrap obamacare. the goal is to undermine the legitimacy of our systems. in this case, the three supreme court so joe biden and kamala harris can pack the court. again, it is about power. oh, that's the key. when confirmation hearings become partisan political exercises they make the supreme court itself seem like a partisan political exercise and that degrades the public trusts in the cord. and the support for the institution. it democrats know that the public to go along with the court packing, they have to delegitimize everything about the court and the confirmation process. if that's what they did today against them. >> it is the legacy of

ruth bader ginsburg, let me close by remembering her for a minutes in this unseemly charade. >> this is a charade when they say this is a normal judiciary committee hearing. >> rushing a judge through a shared process. >> they are confident that the victory in the supreme court is now within their grasp if the senate confirms judge barrett to this hypocritical, illegitimate process. >> yes, judge, i think this hearing is a sham. >> tucker: old. ruth bader ginsburg because in a democracy, and a democracy you are required to obey the posthumous orders of a dead person who is never elected. okay. when you don't, it is a sham, it's a charade. never mind the fact that the sentiment of course course by definition funneling every constitutional procedure for fulfilling a supreme court

vacancy. if amy coney barrett is not the outcome the democrats want therefore the system is in which illegitimate. remember that they tell you that at every turn. if it's not trump who tries to attack the supreme court, he could have tried. he did not consider packing the supreme court. it democrats are planning to and it's a familiar path. hugo chavez packed the supreme courts of venezuela in 2004, and the same in turkey. how did they do that? how did they get their populations to go along with a question mark by teaming the claiming the judicial systems were already illegitimate. >> reveled wiccans are ready packed up the core joe biden declared and yes he had nine justices for more than 150 years and somehow without anybody noticing, president trump pack the supreme court. he did. >> court packing is going on

right now. going on with republicans, packing the court now, it's not constitutional what they are doing. >> tucker: they are the ones of violating the constitution says joe biden, so when i rewrite the constitution, it will be fun. that's the predicate. that's the set up for what's coming next. joe biden knows republicans are not packing the court, he also knows he can repeat the light with no consequences whatsoever because the media will never hold him to account. if they want him to get away with it. back in 2013 when i helped barack obama, a partisan operation road to "court packing has involved one branch of government proposing to change the structure of the court either expanding or decreasing the number of justices." republicans are not doing that, it's pretty simple, they're not in favor of doing that. we will attack them for doing it. we are not partisan. of course, you won't find a politifact fact-checker of what joe biden said on saturday and

the media actually rush to perpetuate the whatever it takes, whatever it takes. this weekend, a piece by the associated press referred to court packing, not sarcastically, "d politicizing the court." you increase the size of the court to dilute the other size power. you pack it full of partisans who do your bidding and that is depoliticizd politicizing. he would be open to measures to depoliticize the court including adding judges to the bench or practice credits packing the court. no, not critics, scholars, historians, politicians. it ruth bader ginsburg herself, every person in america referred to court packing as court packig up until two weeks ago. right. hard to believe that line made

it into print but it did, corporation rocking is d politicizing the courts. you will see it in the neck style guide next to their entries on undocumented shoppers and peaceful riots. funny that ep is onto something inadvertently and many judges and justices in the country are obviously thinking they have too much power. more than individuals should have. power in the country should roadside and the electorate, people elected should have the power and not people who are appointed. unlike the judges they should not be deciding issues like abortion and immigration policy for the entire country but they are. the solution is not to embrace more politics in your judicial branch, we recognize the proper role of the courts and de-escalate a little bit to bring us closer to sanity. in a brief moment for the end of today's hearing and the opening statement, amy coney barrett tried to do exactly that. watch. >> the courts have a vital responsibility to the rule of

law, which is critical to a free society. but courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life. the policy decisions on the value judgments of government must be made by the political branches. elected by an accountable to the people. the public should not expect courts to do so in courts should not try. >> tucker: these hearings of amy coney barrett will continue for the next couple days, barring some really dramatic a developments. it seems likely she will be confirmed in the end. there's not a lot of drama tonight surrounding her nomination. what happens to the supreme court itself, however, is very much in doubt and along with it our country. senator ted cruz sits on the judiciary committee and author. he joins us now with the insight

on what to expect. it senator, thank you for coming on. i found this attack on the process itself is a sham. one thing democrats side, it's a power move and you're doing something that you would not like if we did. all that is probably true, by the way, but to attack the constitutional process for filling an empty court csd as illegitimate. >> you're right, and today's histrionics were about setting the predicate to pack the court. there is a reason joe biden kamala harris refused to answer the question because their answer is yes, they intend to pack the court. they intend it as as a partisan power grab, they know it's not popular with the voters so they're trying to hide that and part of the way they're trying to hide it is to claim then everything else is illegitimate. they are trying also to redefine what packing the court means. they are saying nominating

judges when they there are vacancies and suddenly that is packing the court. as you know, fdr and other democratic presidents tried to pack the court increase the number of justices from 15 and his own party resisted and refused to do it. it democrats controlled congress and they said it would destroy the independence of the judiciary and destroy the supreme court, it would make it just another political body. so they said no, now today's democrats are much more radical than the democrats used to be. >> tucker: you served in the senate through which amy would have to go and pushing. do you think they would attempt this of joe biden and kamala harris win? >> i think they will do it if they win. i think they have the votes, it will be a straight party line vote and got her bed, we wake up in january with biting,

kamala . they will add new states to the united states and four democratic senators and i think they will pack the courts and i think every senate democrat is in on the joke and they know that and it's why kamala refuses to answer it. let me give you a word of optimism and i think today was a very good today. today was a very good day for two reasons. number one, nobody laid a glove on judge barrett. they had no meaningful substance to criticize all the nuts has a lot that they can't criticize that she has impeccable qualifications. number two, the democrats are not actually arguing they are far left radical agenda. you mentioned a minute ago i have a new book, rose to be the number one best seller in the country last week on amazon. what it does, it takes you inside the court, takes you behind the scenes. what's going on with the justices from the perspective of

the major landmark cases of the courts. many of which i helped litigate. it tells the inside story and what is stunning, tucker, on issue after issue, after issue, we are one vote away from losing our fundamental liberties and the democrats don't want to talk about it. they did not want to talk today about their agenda to take away your religious liberty. they did not want to talk today about their agenda to go have a government center in silence you and they did not want to talk today about their agenda to erase the second amendment from the bill of rights. i think that shows that these are important issues for us to lean on because they matter to the american people. >> tucker: i agree with that, people need to wake up. big changes coming. senator cruz, thank you. >> thank you, let me encourage everyone to get the book and i'll tell you something real quickly when i went on the mark levin show last week it's one it shot to number one. of i'm willing to bet that you can ask mark, he'll tell you the

inside of what's going on in the records and what the stakes are. >> tucker: senator cruz, thank you. we told you in detail for weeks that joe biden refused to say what he will do with the supreme court if elected. he admitted it's a fair question to ask after all destroying the judicial branch of the government does seem like not a small thing. on saturday, reported price the issue and that's when joe biden let us know what he thinks. >> i know you said yesterday you weren't going to answer the question until after the election. >> you've been asked by the viewers were probably republicans who do not want me to continue to talk about what they are doing to the court right now. >> don't the voters deserve to know? >> i'm not going to play this game. he would love me to talk about -- i've already said something on packing the courts. instead of what he's doing now.

>> tucker: voters don't deserve to know when he will do if elected says joe biden. anyone who cares about the supreme court is probably republican. hard to believe that's a real clip. a few years ago even joe biden himself would have trouble had believing it. here he was in 2005 not ancient history, we had air conditioning calling court packing exactly what it is. a corrupt power grab. >> summer of '37, roosevelt came off the landslide victory over alf landon. he had a congress made up of a solid new deal with the nine old men in the court were thwarting his agendas. this environment, roosevelt and remember the soul adage about power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. corrupted by power in my view unveiled the court packing plan. he wanted to increase the number of justices to 15 aligning himself to nominate judges.

it took the courage and the part of his own party and institutionally to stand up against this power grab. >> tucker: that's a very different joe biden, 15 years ago completely different person. the question is do voters know what they are getting? joe biden is ahead in the polls tonight and do voters understand what will happen if he is elected? constitutional attorney, trump campaign legal advisor. jennifer, thank you for coming on. there's a lot of issues and senator cruz pointed out the second amendment which has to be the top in this is up there though. court packing. do you think the average person understands what is at stake? >> absolutely, the american people are much smarter than joe biden gives them credit for. they also are absolutely entitled to know because joe biden has been running as a presidential candidate but he's running for a tyrant and king of america. in the 47 years of not doing

anything and being in elitist snob, he told the american people very clearly that he thinks that they democrats are the sovereigns. that they can manipulate the power because they are entitled to it. if there's two things about the democrats today and first they don't want to be held accountable and second, anything they disagree with they will deem as illegitimate. that's the mark of despotic tyrants and the democrats don't care about the constitution, they hate our system. they will use any and all manipulation tools available including changing the definition of meetings like court packing, including contradicting themselves when they know that we have video of just a short time ago. they will do anything to push their own policy agenda through and they will say that they are doing it under the constitution, but really in fact they believe that they are above the constitution. they believe that they are the law rather than actually being under the law and under the constitution. that is why they hate amy coney barrett because she wants to be a judge. they want the judiciary to be

impartial and they want to push their agenda through. >> tucker: donald trump and a lot of loud noises and he's never suggested anything this radical or even this radical. packing the supreme court? that's a byword for radicalism, i wish people understood that. thank you so much, hard to explain that. lockdowns taken a huge toll on everybody in the country, psychologically and economically, the world health organization supported those lockdowns and that's why we had them. but tonight, news that's probably not leading the newscasts on the other channels, the world health organization has changed its mind. on lockdown. an amazing story, straight ahe ahead. ♪ut we put our arm around the veterans. when i think of the veteran out there that needs to refi his home, he may want to purchase, we can help them and provide that financial solution

for they and their families. it's a great rewarding feeling. everybody in the company, they have that deference and that respect and that love for the veteran that makes this company so unique.

♪ >> tucker: six months ago the director of the world health organization assured the world than mass lockdowns were absolutely necessary to stop the stop the coronavirus. you might want to live your life and continue with their jobs, elderly parents tough. it's time for a new normal dr. ted rose told us. >> people and countries with stay with stay-at-home orders are understandably frustrated being confined to their homes for weeks.

on end. people understandably want to get on with their lives because their lives and livelihoods are at stake. that's when we are working for all day, every day. but the world will not and cannot go back to the way things were. there must be a new normal. a world that is healthier, safer, and better prepared. >> tucker: a new normal size doctor who is not actually a doctor ted rose. we can't go back! that's the lie then and very clear it's a lie now. sweden can tell you that was a very, very bad idea. last week, dr. who is the special envoy on the coronavirus admitted it. it lockdowns are not a good idea he says and they were never a

good idea. >> we in the world health organization do not advocate lockdowns as a permeatin primarf controlling the virus. their markets have got tainted and look at what's happened to poverty levels. you have a doubling of world poverty by next year. a doubling of child malnutrition because children's are not getting meals at school and their parents and families are not able to afford it. this is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe actually. we do appeal to all world leaders, stop using lockdown as your primary control method. >> tucker: our leaders are so stupid, so reckless, completely insulated from the consequences of the decision that they made that they doubled the global poverty in six months. good going, guys. will anyone ever trust these people again? why should we? why are they still there?

dr. marc siegel has watch the whole thing from beginning to end in the first person to interview the president on camera during the recovery and the author of the book "covid, the politics of fear and the power of science." we're happy to have them on tonight. hey, doctor. >> i'm going to talk about the w.h.o. and dr. navarro today and also about a former restaurant down in texas. a personal story, terms of the w.h.o., in my book i talk about dr. navarro and did you know in 2005, he said that bird flu is going to kill and could kill up to 150 million people? it scared the entire world. fearmongering. he is still there with the w.h.o., but going forward 15 years and you know the w.h.o. did not warn the world through a emerging pandemic. as you just showed it, ted rose just stated here you need the lockdowns but i'm very happy today to see that dr. navarro come out and say, look, lockdowns can help a little bit

as you regroup or if your health workers are exhausted. about the cost is enormous and they should not be a primary strategy. stick to your masking and distancing. i'm so happy to see the turn around and they're not a reliable group and this is very correct. a look at the united states for a minutes and how it's affected the united states, talker. if restaurants, national restaurant association said last month that 100,000 restaurants are already closed. 40% of restaurant owners say they cannot keep going more than another few months. then you it's a major economic disaster just in terms of restaurants. i want to talk about one restaurant owner down in texas. a woman who owns a bar and grill that can seem to get open because of the log on and she's gone through severe depression that made a suicide attempt. now she's turned to alcohol. i've a message for her tonight. don't listen, we know now when we are learning that the fear from covid, the damage, the side

effects of covid, the side effects from the lockdowns is worse potentially than covid itself. hang in there. we're on it. i hope we can focus on the lockdown damage and not just on covid. tucker. >> tucker: dr. siegel, thank you so much for that. >> thank you. >> tucker: horrible story out of denver, shot at trump supporter in the face and killed him. while the confusion around the case and standing with someone who is danny right nearby when it happened. after the break. ♪

>> tucker: well, probably columbus day where you live in your house anyway. but in the cities controlled by america's unhappiest people its indigenous people day in portland, oregon. the unhappiest city in america. if it's indigenous day of rage, that's what they called it.

portland police declared a riot as they do most nights, and tivo broke windows, through flares into the oregon historical society. they toppled statues of abraham leiva and teddy roosevelt. why abraha abraham lincoln and roosevelt? he said we need to address the climate crisis, people. if indigenous people are hurting, our salmon are hurting. he did not explain what abraham lincoln and teddy roosevelt did to the salmon. we will get to the bottom of the motive for last night's particular riot and we will find out. meanwhile in the city of denver on sunday, security guard called matthew we shot a pro-police by the name of lee in the face and killed him on the street in full view of many people and on vid video. the news in denver contrasts, the security company that hired

him to protect him at the demonstration. it now emerging that he has radically left-wing views and social media he referred to president trump as a fascist dictator and praised blm. there is no record that he's a legally licensed security guard in most places. why did nine news higher him to higher him. it's also pro into effect, we saw the correspondence, openly mocked anybody who's concerned about blm and gentiva. one happen yesterday? stories are swirling around and we spoke to someone who is there. he was there and also at benghazi when it happened in 2002. but he was about 10 feet away when the shooting happened and were happy to have them on tonight. thank you for coming on tonight. >> hey, tucker, thanks. >> tucker: i want to unravel this and tell us as an what you saw.

>> i wasn't that close to it, i kind of go back to where -- when i started doing, within 24 hours the denver democratic party hosted a soup fund-raiser, whatever you want to call it. at a soup drive. and saying they're going to give to the homeless. within a matter of minutes, blm and nt fussing how they're going to use the canvas to projectiles and attack us like they did in the black and blue rally because in july they had april police rally. they came in and immediately started attacking people with skateboards, batons, socks with cue balls and it's and it got extremely violent right out of the get-go. i thought they would come back and try to do the same thing. but that did not happen in the whole entire time leading up to it they wanted to shut us down saying they're going to attack us, they're going to get one of us. right now we find that they got one of us and from what i'm hearing actually the owner of

nine news actually helped push the soup drive and it was nine news, they actually had an agitator, they had the murder that was with them. the whole entire process of the mustard, the agitator had a black guns live matter. he started immediately coming up calling his wife racist,, supremacists, everything under the book. if he had a politician that was there. he's a black individual, the moment that he came up he immediately went and called him a house brother, but use the s and the n-word and then every other individual of color he immediately attacked them and called them a house brother. again, just wanted to say that i'm going to kick your and do this and the whole entire time, just prior to us leaving, the

producer, the murderer, they were all in the corner having a long conversation. >> tucker: can i stop you there? by pinkerton who fired the shot, the producer from nine news, the guy in the black guns matter shirt who was screaming at the pro-police demonstrators, they were altogether talking? >> yep, huddled before we started exiting. he immediately came up and started attacking a pretty good sized black individual a guy named joe. his dad that, when he came out he saw and i'm going to whip your -- and he's about six with five, burly guy just looks and smiles. he kind of backs off and then he immediately goes to another individual. a female came up and tried to de-escalate and he got in her face. again whole entire time he was trying to get a rise. when he was doing it, the

murderer, i'm not even going to say his name, he was there the entire time. nine news was there the entire time and everywhere the agitator went, they went. >> tucker: interesting. of course, we know how it ends. quickly, give us a sense of the man who was murdered in. who was he in what was he doing there, do you know? >> he was pro-american, and again this is not back to blue rally, it to me just a patriotic. he was an american patriot and a veteran he came out to support the cause because were tired of the left trying to keep us quiet through intimidation. you know, he was just there and obviously. >> tucker: well, this qualifies as shooting a man in the face as intimidation i would say. thank you for your account. >> shooting somebody or slapping them in the face, that's not self-defense, that's murder.

>> tucker: thank you so much. i appreciate >> yes, sir. >> tucker: donald trump hates our troops, you heard that again and again. their signs tonight that that stories a little bit more complicated than we have been told. signs at the highest level of the u.s. military are openly defying the president. that's not how the system works. you should be concerned about it. straight ahead. ♪

♪ >> tucker: on labor day, the president pointed out something that is true, but somebody never says. military contractors have an awful lot of power in washingt washington. enough to distort foreign poli policy. >> biden shipped away our jobs, through open our borders, and sent our youth to fight in the crazy endless wars. one of the reasons the military -- i'm not saying the military are in love of the me, the soldiers are. great at top people in the pentagon probably aren't because i want to fight wars because all the wonderful companies who make the bombs, the planes, they're happy.

>> tucker: cue the leaks from anonymous military sources saying the resident hates the troops. tonight, there's ominous signs the military is openly defying our system of civilian control. but today, chairman of the joint chief of staff broke with the white house's plan to lower troop levels in afghanistan to 2500, the plan for both the public demand. he's going to conduct his own rigorous analysis of the situation. again, aren't civilly and supposed to be in control of the military? thoughts about this host of the show and we're happy to have him with us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. i guess i hope i'd be principled enough that a president i despised -- of elizabeth warren were president, i'd be as offended as i am right now because it's and then tack on our system. a system that we should probably keep a pretty good hold on. what's your view of it? >> i think it's great that on oe

on president orders the troop withdrawal, that's up for negotiation with anybody in the military. maybe mark milley is one of their instance that he's writing a book and planning on selling to the resistance people. now he stood up against a trump trying to end a war because that's what it seems like. here's the weird thing, donald trump, he has to and some of the words and you have to pull the troops home now. he is the commander-in-chief. there is no excuses, people are sick and tired of the wars. he's got to take on the establishment, tucker, that's one of the elected of 2016. in the primaries, trump was able to smash the bush dynasty and republican status quo. now he can handle a few military war hawks and mitch mcconnell? i say he can, he promised and that's why he got elected because he promised to give everybody health care an an ende overseas war. right now, president trump, there's millions and millions of

americans who do not follow you on twitter who are hurting, we need a check right now. take the troops home and give the money to the people and nancy pelosi office 1200, you double it, but your name on the check and people need help right now! you know how weak it looks like you're trying to present and position yourself as a victim to nancy pelosi? take the troops home, take the money, pin it in a stimulus check and give it to the people right now. time is ticking. if he had given us health care in this moment whoever gives the american people health care, they're going to put on moshe rushmore. he missed that now it's time to take the troops home and invest the money here. you tell the g.o.p. and the senate to do their job and get the stimulus to the people and he'll put his name on it, whatever meant nancy pelosi offers, doubled it. that's what he would have done in 2016 and he needs to do it now. >> tucker: it's all hilarious, you're a lefty who is not voting trump, giving him better advice than any senate republican and

congressional in washington. your rights. jimmy dora, thank you for that. >> my. any time. >> tucker: california is easing tax money to hire democratic operatives in election season. we have obtained a contract with them and hard to believe that this is legal. speaking with a member of congress and we will get to the bottom of it. next. ♪

>> tucker: and august, the state of california warranted a $35 million contract for a voter turnout program in the state claims is nonpartisan. if how nonpartisan is a question mark on the website says it's on "the team biden." the managing director it is a top abide in aid. he called president trump a liar. it doesn't sound nonpartisan.

he says the state of california may be illegal using federal funds from the cares act. he joins us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. how can this be legal? >> i don't think it is legal, and that's why my company, the oversight committee is requesting that the federal election commission o inspector general launch a investigation. one of the things that the company said they would provide is getting out of vote efforts and that's illegal. and they help america vote act which was part of the cares act. to get out to village, they're going to have to macro target voters. in order to do that, they have to have sensitive voter data from the secretary of state offense. so they would be giving a democrat operative firm voter data to help get out to vote and i'm pretty confident that would not be a vote for a donald trump the house republicans.

>> tucker: it's unbelievable that this was allowed to happen. was there nobody up and down the chain of california state government who said this is so obviously unethical? >> no, apparently not. at this is something that the secretary of state did in a no-bid contract. other companies that wanted to bid and ask about it and said that this is a no bid invitation only contract and they did not have time to go to the normal bid process because of covid virus. this is a another act of wrongdoing, potentially by democrat secretary of state's trying to do things to help get out to vote with the universal and remember california mailed out 21 million universal mail in ballots last week. >> tucker: i know you're busy as a member of congress, but he f time they might compile a book of all the corruption that has been embedded and justified by the covid epidemic. it seems like there's a lot of it. >> there is another example of wasteful spending.

there is no need for secretary mnuchin to continue to negotiate with pelosi. she is not interested in solving the problems in america, she is interested in fulfilling her liberal christmas wish list with more funding for useless, worthless projects such as the one were talking about tonight. >> tucker: this is our response to the covid epidemic. subvert the electoral system. can you do anything about this? >> were not going to let it go, the federal electoral commission is a federal agent and this was created, it was created to be a watchdog over the election. this was created in 2002 in the help america vote act. we are going to put them to work and if they don't do their job, were going to hold them accountable. this is clearly wrongdoing and a no-bid contract to a partisan firm. doing things that are clearly illegal in the help america vote act. something that can be done were not good to let up until he gets done and these people are held accountable. of >> tucker: i hope so,

somebody's finally punished for something. great to see you tonight, thank you for doing that. >> thank you for having me, talker, talker. >> tucker: that's it for us, we'll be back tomorrow night 8:00 p.m., the show that is the sworn and totally sincere enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. sean hannity right now. >> sean: thank you, welcome to "hannity," we start the week with another break breaking news night and president trump has been given a clean bill of health nights and he's back on the campaign trail. all week, moments of go wrapping up a massive rally and i mean massive. it looks like 30,000 people if i had to guess in florida. the president will crisscross the country with the rallies in carolina, georgia, iowa. hannity election correspondent lawrence jones standing by on the ground in florida. if he has a full report about the events just earlier tonight. lawrence will ask voters what they think of biden sneaky, sketchy,