and so on is going to win and this election is over, i don't believe anybody. i don't think anybody knows. you will make that decision three weeks from tonight. set your d.v.r., mefr miss an episode and never let your heart be troubled. haura ingraham. >> laura: i have to get one of those banners. i don't think i have ever set a d.v.r. >> sean: you want to put the ingraham angle to mine? i could loan it to you. >> laura: i think you have to work here for 25 years. >> sean: i don't get paid enough for this abuse. you give it to me. tucker. >> laura: hannity, i checked the mailbox and outside of the house i got nothing from you.

4 1/2 years. no frer. >> have a good show. >> laura: -- no fryer. >> laura: this is "the ingraham angle." if you missed trump tonight in pennsylvania, you missed a doozy. he is back in a big way and now the rallies are drawing parallels with biden in a way that really matters. >> my goal is not to make friends in the d.c. swamp. my goal is to fight for you and fight for your family. in biden wins the orders are gone which means the health care is gone, your middle class is gone and your safety is gone. other than that you will be doing very nicely. >> laura: other than that things will be rosy.

10 days after the covid diagnosis, unbelievable frank. he looked pretty great and sounded even better. when you see this pathetic showing earlier today of joe biden. i'm going to hit this later on in "the angle" day two of amy coney barrett's hearings are in the books. a full breakdown from a senator there today and the legal discussion the best in the business and nancy pelosi. if you didn't see this -- she's totally losing it. she actually accused wolf blitzer of essentially being a member of the vast right-wing conspiracy. nikola jokic takes it all apart later in the -- >> laura: newt gingrich takes it apart later in the hour. amy coney barrett for day two of

her hearings and since the democrats cannot match her intellect they decided to launch this series of desperate attacks and smear attempts. senator mazie hirono led with the absurd kavanaugh-esque line of questioning. >> since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature? >> laura: did someone mix up her notes from the kavanaugh hearing? what was that? senator klobuchar engaged in legal arguments with barrett but that too backfired. >> is roe a super precedent? >> how do you defend super precedent? >> i might have thought someday i would sitting in that chair. i'm not. >> people use super precedent differently, and answering a lot of questions about roe which indicates roe does not fall in that category.

>> laura: that's the problem when someone else writes your questions for you. "i don't know. what do you think?" senator feinstein employed a sickening tactic. of using barrett's personal life to figure out a way of how she should back into -- i don't know, abortion? >> you don't have a magic formula for how you do it and handle all the children and your job and your work and your thought process, which is obviously excellent, do you? >> it's improv. >> yes. yes. well, let me begin with a question that the chairman touched on, and it's of great importance, i think, because it goes to a woman's fundamental right to make the most personal decisions about their own body. >> laura: that was quite a segue. we have a beautiful family. let's move on to abortion. and no confirmation hearing would be complete without loaded

racial questions from spartacus himself. >> i want to ask you very simply, i imagine you will give me a very short, resolute answer, but you condemn white supremacy, correct? >> yes. >> thank you. i'm glad to see that you said that. >> laura: this is -- i dipped in and out of this throughout the day and it seemed to get worse as the day went on. not exactly representing the highest decorum or what should be the ideal supreme court confirmation line of questioning. and we wanted to show you these sound bites tonight to demonstrate the utter shallowness and the callousness of the democrats' posture in the age of trump. joining me is a senator who sat through the entire saga today. marsha blackburn from the great state of tennessee.

senator blackburn, when i watched judge barrett, the way she handled herself, of course we all know she had no notes in front of her unlike the senators who can't utter a syllable without a staffer having written a question. the calm she displayed. the legal intellect. the poise. what a stark contrast to the democrats asking about white supremacy and comparing her children to the abortion process -- the whole thing was just frankly disgusting. >> well, you're right, and you look at the arrogance of dianne feinstein or how condescending senator leahy was to her. klobuchar, so emotional. hirono so dismissive. harris. very combative. she never got flustered. she never was ruffled. here is the thing. i think she's well prepared,

laura, for knowing that the left is always going to denigrate and dismiss and ridicule and mock a conservative woman. they know that. amy coney barrett knows that. and i think she was prepared for what they were going to do and how they were going to come at their questioning, and quite frankly, the way they tried to build out the affordable care act argument and tilt everything to health care and then create a national panic, saying people are terrified. they were projecting their fears onto the american people saying the american people are terrified. they're scared. they're frightened. they're trying to create this panic and say she is going to take their health care away. which is not true, and i will tell you, laura, their numbers -- they keep inflating these numbers on health care. they grow bigger every day.

>> laura: well, i think what they're doing with the hearing it seems to me, senator, they know she's going to get confirmed. they know she runs circles around them, in intellect, and knowledge, and ability to think on her feet. she doesn't need someone prepping her, with written questions, a terrific job prepping her but she's brilliant and they know that so what they're doing is they're using this as an extension of the biden campaign. we're not watching a confirmation hearing. >> you're right. >> laura: we're watching the biden campaign in all of its desperate tactics. >> you're exactly right, and that's why they keep saying 150 million people will lose their health care if obamacare is repealed. here is the truth. 8.3 million americans are in the obamacare marketplace. 8.3 million. you've got 57 million that are on medicare. you've got 153 million people that have private health

insurance. you've got 66 million on medicaid. where they come up with these numbers? and they never say if we get our way, if we get socialized medicine, then 153 million of you are going to lose your private health insurance. because they will get obamacare -- and by the way, obamacare is not the issue they're after. they don't want a constitutionalist judge on the supreme court who might block them from doing socialized medicine, green new deal, d.c. statehood, abolishing the electoral college. >> laura: they're going to pack the court. i want to play this exchange, senator, between senator john kennedy of louisiana and jauj barrett. check it out. >> some butt-head professor at boston university says that because you and your husband have two children of color that

you're a white colonist, and that you use your two children as props. >> it was the risk of saying people saying things like that -- my husband had to weigh the cost of it. it was saying deeply offensive and hurtful things, things not only hurtful to me but hurt willful to my children, whom we love. accusations like that are cruel. >> laura: senator blackburn, very quickly, those are the compassionate, pro-child, pro-women party we're supposed to believe in. >> well, and we know that the left -- if you do not kow to you to their agenda -- if you do not kowtow to their agenda, if you don't go for their pro-choice, liberal, leftist narrative, and this is the closest that judge barrett got to emotion during

the course of the day, but it is despicable that people would go after their relationships, they're bringing these children into their family -- the fact that they have adopted these children, laura, it is absolutely horrific, and it is upsetting to hear it. they should be saying thank goodness there are people that will take children that are needing a home and will bless them with a family life. >> laura: as a mother of three adopted children myself, internationally adopted -- i took that very personally for her, and she was phenomenal. she's going to be an amazing justice on the court. senator, thank you for sitting through that and asking great questions today. we'll be watching as it unfolds. thanks for joining us. >> thank you, laura. >> laura: joining me to break it down is robert dunn, former

clerk of justice thomas, and robert, let's get into it, barrett laid down the marker early on in the day. >> i haven't even written anything that i would think anybody could say this is how she might resolve an election dispute and i consider it -- i certainly hope that all members of the committee have more confidence in my integrity than to think that i would allow myself to be used as a pawn to decide this election for the american people. >> laura: robert, this is what likely led to the dems on the day up there lashing out like we just showed. >> yeah. they are terrified that she's going to rule against them on an election case and that she is somehow a secret agent that trump has sent onto the court and i don't think she could be any more clear that she owes trump nothing, and the american people need to know that the moment she is confirmed he has no power over her at all. he can't fire her. he can't reduce her pay.

every republican president in my lifetime has regretted a decision when someone went against him and president truman said the moment a justice is confirmed they're no longer your friend and that could be true for president trump the next four years. he could be having a dinner where he's cursing her but she's going to rule impartially. >> laura: so impressive. harmeet, you have been tracking senator harris's idiocy on the campaign trail but today in her hearing she made an attempt to be relevant, one moment in particular is when she talked about let's not pretend the way we don't know the way amy really feels. watch. >> are you aware of president trump's statements permitting to nominate judges who will strike down the affordable care act?

and i appreciate a yes or no answer, please. >> i don't recall seeing those statements. >> i imagine you were surrounded by a team of folks that helped prepare you for this nomination hearing. let me finish if you don't mind. >> i'm so sorry. >> laura: she tried to pull that little let me finish thing like she did at the debates to a spectacular fail, harmeet. >> that's her reflex. her reflex is to play the victim and be put upon and also that kind of bullying, bossying mannerism in that grating voice and that grating, fake demeanor, even though kamala harris mistook this hearing about a supreme court nominee as a campaign opportunity because she spoke for about 95% of the 44 minutes or so today in a monologue about the affordable care act and a couple of other issues, she did herself no favors, i think, and she showed herself to be an inept cross

examiner, the big buildup as it was to the kavanaugh hearing she's a great cross examiner. she couldn't cross examine her way out of a paper bag. i think rob and i would agree with that. the witness ran circles around her there. it was something to see, laura. >> laura: robert, i want to play another harris because come on. this was really about the biden campaign. it was not about the confirmation hearing. she made another bizarre statement during the hearing. watch. >> considered filling the seat of justice ruth bader ginsburg who was straightforward enough in her confirmation hearings to say that the right to choose is quote a central to woman's equality, unquote, i would suggest that we not pretend that we don't know how this nominee views a woman's right to choose. >> laura: robert, we have amy

coney barrett, who doesn't have a note in front of her, and we have kamala harris who could be president of the united states given biden's condition if he wins doing this, "and i would suggest that we not" -- it was unbelievable. >> it was, and i think her answers were consistent. she got a variation of that question all throughout the day, really, and she was very clear. she respects roe and she doesn't consider them super precedents as some of the democrats tried to call and she's going to take every case that comes before her and they may not like some of the results, they may be surprised in a pleasant way for some of the results because she isn't just going through there and doing the president's bidding. this attack isn't launched on every catholic, justice thomas is a devout catholic and one thing he's naefr been accused of is being a will too far the vatican. he's been accused of a lot of things but being a tool of the

vatican isn't one of them. he would look at you like you were out of your mind and tell you to go back and read your bench memo. she's going to be the same way. that's not who she is. >> laura: just for fun, we have to -- i guess it was senator leahy had a little bit of a problem, harmeet. watch. >> do you know how many republicans on this committee have joined amicus briefs urging courts to overturn the a.c.a. versus sebelius and king versus perwell? >> having trouble hearing senator leahy. could the volume be turned up? >> i am sorry for that. how does it come through now? >> that was part of the covid fear, don't go into the hearing room. come on. real quick.

>> the whole thing today was a comedy of errors and it showed first of all -- and time and again in many other settings how senators don't know how to use technology. kamala harris had that problem yesterday with the zoom boom voice but it was a poor showing. we really expect better from our senators. they should be better prepared and if they don't have something productive to say we should move on. i heard kamala harris talk about it's only 16 days of cramming it through but she wasted 95% of her time talking about something totally off point, so they had plenty of time to do this. it wasn't even about amy coney barrett today. >> laura: no, this was an extension of the biden campaign. he's not doing many campaign appearances so the committee was doing it for him. the democrats. robert, harmeet, wonderful appearance. my angle very clearly lays out why trump's covid response has actually saved the country, and then presidential covid advisor

dr. scott atlas will respond. stay there.

>> laura: a trump or biden economy. that's the focus of tonight's "angle." the world health organization has finally confirmed what we at

"the ingraham angle" have been telling you for months. that covid lockdowns are horribly destructive especially to the poor. in light of all of this it's time for another reality check and to realize how fortunate we are that trump was in charge before, doing did during and after the pandemic hit. the politicized expert class has been wrong more than right and president trump was smart enough to follow his own america-first instincts instead of their america-last default, and if the pro-biden media toadys -- if they think the angle is going to let them get off the hook for their idiocy, think again because it's flash back time. >> if we can show this graph of the united states versus the european union. europe crushed the curve to where it's now well below the u.s. and stable. >> laura: that stability didn't last long. european nations entered lengthy

lockdowns and now they're experiencing a massive surge of covid cases and even deaths, while we're steadily improving. we have been since about july. the only thing europe crushed was its economy. the i.m.f.'s new g.d.p. loss protections vindicate trump. the u.s. beat every other g-7 member nation in managing the covid fallout. had we listened to team biden we would look like the u.k., france or italy. total disasters. look at those numbers. the euro-zone has a lot to offer. 8.3%. had we followed their lead our economy would have lost, we did the calculations today, about $1.6 trillion instead of the $815 billion hit that we did take, and it wasn't pleasant but trump's reaction -- his policies saved us from a $770 billion loss.

that's more than the g.d.p. of ohio. that's like taking ohio out of our country for a year. ok, but what about the future now? let's look at that. under trump, it's so bright as the song goes you would have to wear shades. third quarter growth is going to be record setting, annualized about 32% and it would have been even higher if the petty tyrants running the blur states weren't dragging their feet on reopening their economies. hello, california. according to "the spertator" 14 out of the top 15 -- according to "the spectator" 14 of the top 15 are in republican led states where 12 of out of the 16 weakest recoveries are occurring in democratic lead led states. of course. what doesn't the -- why doesn't the press ask biden about any of this? because they're asking as his team, that's why. biden has no answer for any of

this, god bless him because there is no answer for this, and he's losing it. his lockdown, tax and regulate approach to governance will lead us to football know ruin, people. he will -- will lead us to financial ruin, people. the economic one. it really is. he did this. he nailed it tonight in pennsylvania. >> in my first three years in office, family income increased by $6,000. more than five times the gains in all eight years of the obama administration. after our tax cuts took effect, wages for the lowest income americans grew twice as fast as those near the top. african-american income grew nine -- not two, not three.

nine times more, and these are out of the book. >> laura: the crowd was wild because this is success. you cannot debate it. just the job numbers and wage increases from trump's first three years in office should be enough to convince every voter in america to support him, and what's biden's answer to all of this? >> gallup reported last week 56% of americans said that they were better off today than they were four years ago, so why should people who feel that they are better off today under the trump administration vote for you? >> if they think that, they probably shouldn't though their memory is not very good, quite frankly. >> laura: wait a second. is biden questioning other people's memories? didn't he just forget mitt romney's name? on nearly every key economic and covid issue, donald trump has been proven correct, and biden proven wrong. and biden, by the way, never

learned. he just mumbled bromid-s about unity and dignity and -- he just mumbled bromides about dignity and i was thinking about this today. i know this. i know a lot of people out there feel this way. they feel like trump is a bully. he's too tough around the edges. rough around the edges. those who call him a bully should remember am what he's accomplished for them. despite what he's been up against from day one. the deep state. corrupt comey. the mueller investigation. the obamas. the clintons. george soros. a phony impeachment. the pro-china crowd on wall street. big tech billionaires. medical experts acting as political assassins, woke celebrities in sports and hollywood, academia and, of course, a dishonest, far-left,

hateful press. so the real bullies -- they'll be people like gretchen whitmeror andrew cuomo or j.b. pritzker and they'll perhaps be running a biden d.o.j. or e.p.a., department of education and d.h.s. if biden wins you will not only be pining for the good old days of record setting wage growth but for the fighter who against all odds achieved great things for america. and that's "the angle." joining me is white house covid advisor dr. scott atlas. dr. atlas, do you believe that should biden win his experts will urge, if there are covid cases popping in january, urge us to lock down again? >> hey, laura. thanks for having me. anyone who is talking about doing another lockdown has really not been paying attention for the last seven months and is

simply out of touch with average americans. because the lockdowns have been the -- the prolonged lockdowns are a complete disaster. they're a complete disaster for missed health care. they're a complete disaster for average working families. and particularly for people who are working-class and lower-income people. people have been killed by people who want to have prolonged lockdowns, and when i say "killed" i look at the data. that means, for instance, this week it was shown that 46% of the most common types of cancers were not diagnosed during the lockdown. those cancers didn't disappear. they're there. people will present with much later, more widespread disease. half of people who had chemotherapy appointments didn't show up. that's 650,000 americans. half of people who had immunizations for children didn't come in out of the fear instilled by our so-called public health experts. 40% of people with acute stroke.

this is devastating. when you close schools, schools alone, we had more than 200,000 cases of child abuse not reported during the two months of the school closures, and now we're in a situation where one out of four college age americans have contemplated killing themselves during the month of june. that's a c.d.c. report. this is completely off the rails and it's much worse not for the elites who are sipping lattes working for a tech couple of company where i live in silicon valley but for people who are average, working-class americans, they are destroyed by prolonged lockdowns. >> laura: hold on, dr. atlas. why don't we hear dr. fauci ever addressing the larger american patients? do you ever ask him that? do you ever talk to him and say "you never talk about these other circumstances that have been created by these lockdowns."

this guy, peter hotas, on cnn today, he said i'm telling my own family get ready for lockdowns this winter. that's what they're saying. >> i can say this. history will record the faces of the public health expertise as some of the most sinful, egregious, epic failures in the history of public policy. they have killed people with their lack of understanding and their lack of caring about not just the impact of cases of covid-19, a virus that the overwhelming majority of people do well in, notwithstanding, of course, not underestimating 200,000 americans who died, that's tragic but these people have been a gross failure because they never cared to consider the impact of the policy itself, and the policy itself has been a complete, epic failure, and honestly, some people say a crime against humanity. these people should be held accountable for what they said.

>> tom: a scale of one to 10, 10 being the strongest, one being the weakest, how do you rate donald trump's recovery from covid? >> listen, the facts speak for themselves. it's not a political statement. it's a data-based statement. the president was caught blindsided. the country. the world was caught blindsided and there was an immediate mobilization of resources. >> laura: one to 10, scott. we've got to go. >> i've got to go 10. i would like to go into details. you are going to force me, i'll say a 10. >> laura: the president tonight in pennsylvania. unbelievable. he looked stronger than ever. dr. atlas, thanks for joining us, sorry to cut you off, nancy pelosi if you missed it she completely lost her mind on cnn. the tape. the reaction. newt gingrich. in moments. now, simparica trio simplifies protection.

ticks and fleas? see ya! heartworm disease?

no way! simparica trio is the first chewable that delivers all this protection. and simparica trio is demonstrated safe for puppies. it's simple: go with simparica trio. this drug class has been associated with neurologic adverse reactions, including seizures; use with caution in dogs with a history of these disorders. protect him with all your heart. simparica trio.

♪ >> laura: nancy pelosi probably agreed to appear on cnn today thinking it was going to be another usual softball interview from america's leading antitrump propaganda outfit but it quickly devolved into an epic meltdown. >> even members of your own caucus, madam speaker, accept this $1.8 trillion. >> you're always an apologist, and many of your colleagues apologists for the republican position. do you have any idea what's in their bill and what's in our bill? >> there is a lot there. >> honest to god. you really don't know what you are talking about. >> laura: the speaker is not well or is a challenge in the offing? joining me now, former speaker newt gingrich. newt, why do you think pelosi was so thrown off by that line

of questioning by not taking $1.8 trillion, i choke when i say that, trillion dollar deal? >> i think she is not used to anybody challenging her. she thinks she lives in a bubble. she lives in a world where, if she's caught cheating on wearing a mask and going into a beauty salon that's supposed to be closed, it must be somebody else's fault. it was an ambush set up to hurt her. when members of her caucus don't get it it's because they're stupid, because she's brilliant, and i think she's very fragile at this stage and i think it's interesting to watch. if if you think about it, if you're going to have a leadership of pelosi, schumer and biden -- talk about people that have some amazing length of time in washington, all of them are at a point in life where they get irritable and edgy and biden at times blowing up at reporters and blowing up,

telling people if you're not for me you're not black, comments that 10 years ago he would never have made, and she's in the same boat. she may be frankly -- her past-due date may have already expired. >> laura: here is more because this is such a special moment for nancy. here is more from the on-air meltdown. >> millions of americans who can't put food on their tables, who can't pay their represent. >> and we represent them, and we represent them, and we represent them, thank you for your sensitivity to our constituents' needs. >> i am sensitive to them because i see them on the street begging for food, begging for money. >> have you fed them? we feed them, we feed them. >> laura: newt, i was clutching my side, i was laughing so hard. she's not long for the speaker's world, i think this is a sign that even if they hold the house i'm not sure nancy is going to be speaker of the house in the

new term. >> sure, she wouldn't. it's about raw power. look, pelosi is a person who could with no sense of irony be standing in front of a $24,000 refrigerator eating $12 a pint ice cream and expressing her concern for poor americans. she has no sense of irony. she can live in a protected enclave and think it's ok to defund the police and not see any contradiction in the size of her security patrol and the fact that she wants to leave average citizens without any police. this is the beginning of the -- the california liberalism -- you have a vice presidential candidate from san francisco. the speaker of the house from san francisco. and the ranking member of the judiciary committee of the senate from san francisco. and then the governor of california is from san francisco. for a city that can't collect human found off the street, that is an extraordinary level of --

of human feces off the street, it is an extraordinary level of -- >> laura: i'm not going to -- play another sound bite from that exchange. i think we get it now but i do, newt, want to ask you about the importance of republicans trying to take back the house of representatives. you came along in 1994 and changed the world. the first time the republicans had the house in several decades. you were able to do it with a midterm election. it's not out of the realm of possibility here and i don't think people should give up on that. >> no, i think the fact is that if trump continues to campaign as well as he did tonight in pennsylvania, and continues to make the case on the big issues and gets off all the minor stuff, i think that he can beat biden by a big margin and i think in the process we'll take back the house and more than keep the senate. maybe increase the senate.

the key for the trump campaign, frankly, is to get on these big issues such as the biden depression versus the trump recovery, and stay on them and not get down into the weeds and not get drawn off on things. the news media works every day to get trump to say something that doesn't get his main point across so they can avoid covering how bad biden is, and trump all too often plays into that. he needs to focus on the big choices in which case three weeks from now we're going to have an astonishing election. >> laura: newt, i could not think of anyone better to have on tonight. thanks for joining us. >> great to be with you. >> laura: straight ahead a biden institution would institutionalize a level of grifting or grift not seen since, i don't know, maybe the clinton days and who stands to profit the most? biden's own family, of course. i'm greg, i'm 68 years old. i do motivational speaking in addition to the substitute teaching.

i honestly feel that that's my calling-- to give back to younger people. i think most adults will start realizing that they don't recall things as quickly as they used to or they don't remember things as vividly as they once did. i've been taking prevagen for about three years now. people say to me periodically, "man, you've got a memory like an elephant." it's really, really helped me tremendously. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.

♪ >> laura: for all the baseless talk about how the trump family has monetized all their time in d.c., you think that the media would be worried about the unprecedented level of grift that a biden administration would bring. political profiteering seems to be kind of a biden family

tradition. we already know about hunter biden's shady deals at home, and china and ukraine and he got the $3.5 million from the former mayor of moscow's wife but there is his sister. have you heard of ashley biden? her dad was v.p., the nonprofit she worked for got a huge federal grant in 2014. two months later she got a big promotion. then there is ashley's husband, howard crine and her brother-in-law. they run a company with holdings and start-ups that. he's simultaneously advising his father-in-law, joe, on covid policy. nothing to see here. no appearance of impropriety or conflict. dinesh d'souza and his film.

a hit. the latest twist that biden denies, by the way, where is the rest of the media on those? >> yeah, the biden family has enriched itself enormously through access to joe biden. most of these people, the son, hunter biden, the brothers james and frank biden, the son-in-law, they have very little qualifications themselves but their qualification is that they are related to joe biden, so whenever joe biden is the point man on anything there is money to be made. look, if the clintons can make money off earthquakes and famines in haiti, no reason the bidens can't make money off covid. these people are like vultures and they circle looking for political opportunities to cash in, and it's all over the world. they have made money not just in the ukraine. that was the tip of the iceberg. they made money in china. frank but den made money getting green contracts in central

america. they made money in costa rica. they made money getting contracts to build homes in iraq. something that none none of the bidens is even qualified to do. the trumps built things. they built wollman rink. they're losing money in government. trump gives away his salary. for biden, government is not just an ideology it's a great business opportunity. >> laura: i want to turn to biden's long time business partner, archer. hunter and archer received millions of dollars from nationals with questionable backgrounds according to the homeland security report and last week a federal appeals court, the second circuit court of appeals reinstated archer's conviction. the scheme committed under the auspices of a broader business venture in which hunter biden was involved and perpetrators invoked his name to bolster

their legitimacy. dinesh, the devin archer angle. the media? no interest. >> i think it's because we have too high expectations of the media, when we say things like the media has a double standard look at the way they covered trump with a fine-tooth comb, things that aren't there but they cover the bidens with this light touch pretending there is nothing to see there, we're assuming that the media aspires to some higher impartiality, i'm afraid that's not even the case so we're in a sense -- >> laura: good to see you, thank you, still ahead, trump isn't just cured from covid, he's trained as a dancer.

>> president trump was on fire and pennsylvania tonight he eve had time for dancing with the stars moment.

♪ >> at least he didn't do that overbite thing. he was cute, but he went on and on and on by the way. you look at the faces, people were just howling, they were laughing. people were enjoying themselves very don't want that again? they are doing it in red state america already. that all the time we have tonight. shannon bream with her phenomenal analysis of the hearings all day on fox and primetime box, fantastic and th fox news at night team take it all from here. shannon, it's your friday night dance party. you got to invite trump to that pretty i've seen you dance. you like to have a good time two . >> i will invite you and the president to our friday night dance party. post covid, i am there. >> tonig