that is speed 25 of tuesday october 20th 2020, but the story continues, see you back or tomorrow night, 7:00 from nashville, tennessee, as we kick off our special coverage of the final presidential debate. good night, everybody. ♪ ♪ speech to the president on the road tonight speaking in erie, pennsylvania. is all over the country in his final days of the election. we will be monitoring his speech tonight for news and we will bring it to you if it happen. good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." you just saw the president. what happened to joe biden? remember him? longtime senator, obama's bp. on the ballot in two weeks from today in fact. joe biden was last seen a couple of days ago buying milk shakes in north carolina. one of them vanilla, the other chocolate. he hasn't been heard from since. given his present condition, that is worrisome.

if you see him wandering in a park or lost in the crafts i love walmart, be sure to alert authorities. biden's campaign team assures us there is no cause for concern tonight. the final presidential debate is on thursday of this week and he's just preparing for that back in his basement practicing elocution, war gaming the election on zoom, picking the right time. if you can't be too ready for these things. that's what they're telling us and maybe it's true. maybe joe biden really does need a week to prepare for a 90-minute debate moderated by an msnbc correspondent. totally possible, but there are other potential expo nations as well. last week we learned how his vice president, joe biden, altered the foreign policy to -- big tech in the national media tried hard to kill that story, but it hasn't really gone away. the facts aren't like that, they tend to persist, they are hard to erase. this afternoon, "the new york post" published yet another newsworthy document taken from hunter biden's personal laptop. it's a photograph, undated that shows joe and hunter biden

posing with the man. hhe's an oligarch from the natin of kazakhstan, a former soviet satellite country. he has close ties to that nation a posthumous corrupt government. reportedly hunter biden helped him stash his fortune here in the united states. this new photograph reveals that hunter biden also provided him with access to his father. so it would be worth knowing a lot more about this. that's all we know, but we should know more before we vote in two weeks. for example, how much money changed hands? to the bidens do in return for that money, if anything? we should know. and maybe we will learn the answers, because there's an awful lot of material on that laptop. leaders of the democratic party are very aware of that, of course, and it terrifies them, so they're doing everything they can to prevent you from seeing that information before you make up your mind. that includes concocting ludicrous and potentially dangerous conspiracy theories about foreign interference in our political system. yesterday, perfect example, a

group of more than 50 former u.s. intelligence officials -- who are these people? they are the very same people who missed 9/11, who endorsed the iraq war and weapons of mass destruction. the people who illegally spied on american citizens for years. those people signed a letter claiming that "the new york post" story could very well be part of a secret russian operation designed to help vladimir putin 's fellow slavic dictator donald j. trump cling to power. "our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the russian government played a significant role in this case." these are so-called intelligence operatives, but they offered no evidence to support that reckless claim, that very serious coin. why didn't they offer any evidence? because there is no evidence. none exists. instead they simply asserted it, which means they simply lied. they lied to the american public in order to influence the outcome of a supposedly free and fair election. isn't that what they claim russia does? are doing it. with much greater effect they've

been doing it for years. but this time in the final days before we vote, they're not even bothering to hide what they're doing or their methods. senior figures in our vast national security state are working in concert with the democratic party to get joe biden elected. that sounds naughty even to say out loud, but it's not nutty, it's happening. they're showing us what they're doing. watch senator chris murphy of connecticut, a thuggish party hack, a man who has been in politics since he was 25 years old, our generation's joe mccarthy, vomit forth this masterpiece of dishonesty. >> i can confirm that their campaign of misinformation and propaganda and interference is bigger, it's broader and it's more problematic than it was in 2016. in particular because the russians this time around decided to cultivate u.s. citizens as assets. they are attempting to try to spread their propaganda in the

mainstream media rather than just relying on, you know, bots and facebook posts as they largely were four years ago. they've been successful. you know, rudy giuliani is effectively a russian asset at this point. i think -- you know, made some significant ground above and beyond what they were doing four years ago. >> tucker: a child posing as a senator. senator murphy is welcome on the show anytime for the hour any day. he's a coward in addition to being a liar. here's what he's telling us. he is telling us. he's telling us the former mayor of new york city, ladies and gentlemen, is a russian asset. keep in mind for 50 years rudy giuliani has worked for the american government at all levels from local to federal. but now, senator murphy, a sitting senator, tells us that giuliani is a traitor, a treasonous russian spy. it's too bad you can't sue sitting senator's libel. chris murphy certainly deserves that at minimum. so does john brennan, former cia

director. so does the former rector of national intelligence jim clapper. clapper is the man who lied under oath on camera but was never prosecuted for it because he's not roger stone. both of those two signed a letter claiming the russians are behind hunter biden's emails. what does this mean? we'd said it before and we are not prone to alarmism on the show but we will say it again and we mean it more than ever, this is an ominous moment when every power center in the nation, that includes big tech i'm a big media, the finance establishment, the federal spy agencies, when every power center aligns behind a common political goal, you have a very dangerous [indiscernible]. that is far too much power concentrated in one place. normal people will inevitably be crushed and they are being crushed, but that's okay, the media tell us, they deserve to be crushed because anyone interested in learning more about the emails and hunter biden's laptop is effectively colluding with the russians. >> it just lacks credibility and

the fact that it appeared in "the new york post" and that they chose to report on it extensively sort of says a lot about where we are in 2020 as opposed to 2016, when a lot of news organizations reported on emails that had been hacked by the russians, democratic emails and then leaked and they were newsworthy and people reported on them, we are in a much different situation because we now know that russian disinformation or foreign disinformation or even campaign disinformation period is as dangerous to our democracy is anything exposed in these emai emails. >> tucker: that's all most unbelievable. that guy you just saw, who is the nbc news intelligence analyst or reporter or whatever, some name, he was caught, and you can look it up and you should look it up, he was caught sending his stories to the cia for approval before running them. he was working for the cia and posing as a journalist. that's true. but notice what he's not saying in that clip. he's not saying -- none of them are saying -- that the emails are fake.

they are not going to claim that because they know it's not true. the emails are not fake. just like the dnc emails that leaked four years ago. the emails were real and everyone knows they're real. laptop is real. hunter biden signed for it. his lawyer asked for it back. and to this day, no one has shown or even claimed that a single photograph or video or document, email, text, on that laptop, tens of thousands is fraudulent, not one. so they're not even trying to convince you really that russia did this. they're trying to bully you into shutting up and they're using lies. russia did it! russia, russia, russia, russia! are sworn and former enemies, the russians, and impair more evil and more threatening to america even in the twin perils of poland and hungary -- poland and hungary? yep, those are nations that don't bind describe just the other day as totalitarian regimes. but you didn't know that poland and hungary, tiny peaceful nations in central europe, where threats to american national

security. did you know that? well, they are. unlike say china, which pays far higher consulting fees to everyone in d.c. what do poland and hungary pay? nothing. in any case, russia. the point is russia, russia is bad. russia indirect collusion with -- by the way, this news channel ladies and gentlemen, planted that laptop in order to create, in the words of cnn, "the appearance of scandal." that's right. the appearance. watch. >> you call this a classic example of the right-wing media machine. >> that's right, this is an example of steve bannon giving a tip to a new york post reporter, rudy giuliani handing over a bunch of documents, "the new york post" putting it on the front page and then fox running with it for days on end, creating disappearance of a scandal involving hunter biden. >> tucker: but why don't you assess the emails? what did they say? they don't tell you. it's the right-wing media machine working with the russians. that's not even journalism.

that's really responsible. yesterday the director of national intelligence tried to put an end to this. if there is, as we've said, and he confirmed yesterday, precisely zero evidence showing the russians planted that laptop or invented any of the documents on it or conspired to leak it or played any role at all. today the senior federal law enforcement official told fox news that the fbi and doj concurred with that assessment. another log forstmann confirms they are -- what we told you from day one. we've seen a lot of them. they are real. you may not think there are a big deal. you can make that argument, but they're real. the russians didn't do this. but to our media, and sitting numbers of congress, all those denials just prove their point. it turns out the director of national intelligence is in on it too. he's part of the conspiracy. he's a prudent agent. watch. >> director radcliffe said there's no intelligence, his words, no intelligence, that would indicate the smear against

hunter biden is part of a russian disinformation campaign. last week the house intelligence committee chairman adam schiff told me exactly the opposite, so how much stock do you put into what the director of national intelligence is now same? >> well, not a lot. not a lot, because, sadly mr. radcliffe, who used to be one of my colleagues, has demonstrated that his interest is largely in supporting the president and the president's political fortunes. >> tucker: so we could parse the clip we just played, but honestly, why bother? it's too stupid to analyze. there's nothing sophisticated or interesting about this. it's store brand propaganda. the generic variety. they're not even trying to convince you the russians did it, they don't believe in themselves, obviously and they don't really care if you believe it either. they just want you to stop talking about "the new york post" story for the next two weeks while it still matters. so trump can lose. and maybe that will work.

we don't know. but we are all still going to live here when the smoke clears and what then? and the mad scramble to unseat the president, our core institutions are being destroyed of free press, fair elections, y agencies that won't from their dark arts on the public, all of that is disappearing. we should fight to get those institutions back no matter where you come from. pierce morgan is a longtime british journalist who is deeply familiar with the american media. he learned the hard way. also the author of the brand-new book, "wake up, why the world has gone nuts." congrats on the book, thanks for joining us tonight. i'm glad that it's out finally. let me ask you -- i want to take trump out of this. most journalists hate drum. i think you don't like drum. let's take that out. >> i like him. i just think he's had a very bad year. >> tucker: for sure, he has, but the matter who is, don't reporters have an obligation --

journalist have an obligation to cover the news as honestly as they can, no matter how they feel about the guy there covering? >> completely and this is the whole point. i wrote a column for dailymail.com yesterday saying it doesn't matter what side you're on here. journalists, freedom of speech, dictates -- the first amendment dictates that one a story like this drops and it's not being denied by the people it's accusing for six days now, clearly there is something there that they want to hide. the job of a newspaper, of a television network, of anybody, frankly, in the media, who believes in freedom of speech and believes in journalism is to go and investigate the allegations new york post have made. it's not the job of tech giants like facebook and twitter to have an instinctive reaction to suppress every element of that story or for most of the mainstream media to say nothing to see her. in fact the only story is this terrible smear on the bidens.

and i would say to you, imagine if we switched the names around. imagine if the story was about donald trump jr. and donald trump. what would be happening? do you think that the tech giants would be suppressing the story with the mainstream media ignoring the story, saying that it's all just an unfair smear on the trumps? if you reverse this, it would be a completely different situation and they would all be behaving in a completely different manner. this is one of the most extraordinary collective suppressions of freedom of speech that i have ever seen and it's one of the main themes in my book, what is going on and what is going on with liberals, frankly? and i consider myself to be one, but what is going on when liberals want to attack and suppress freedom of speech? >> tucker: that is the core question, because, you know, elections come and go, politicians come and go, the country remains, you hope and its core institutions on that as a pillar that hold up our

democracy. so you've done this for an awfully long time, you've been in the media for decades at every level. what do you think happens after this election? how do we go back to what we had? is impossible when the smoke clears? where are we? >> if joe biden was to win does he think the story goes away? of course it doesn't. it would be like every other scandal when they tried to hide something. joe biden needs to come out and needs to talk about this, but there is such tribalism now i think in america and we are having the same problem here in britain and again, i touch on this in the book, it's driven by social media. everyone gets in their tribe and they can't deviate. i prefer to cut through the tribes and i think you do too. and cut to just a sense of fair play in the sense of fair play, if you got to address this story in the same way with two weeks before an election, joe biden wants to be president, you must expose him to exactly the same scrutiny you would do if it was

donald trump and his son and at the moment, that is not happening. there is a conspiracy happening right in front of our eyes to make the story go away and joe biden, you know, he wants to be the decent candidate. he wants to be the antidote to the devilish donald trump. okay. then come forward and speak honestly and openly about these allegations. >> tucker: i think that is the wisest and most honest take that there is and sometimes people who are looking at the u.s. from abroad see it more clearly. and more than anything i hope people do wake up. congratulations on your new book and i hope our audience will check it out. i read it. "wake up." great to see you tonight, thank you. >> good to see you. >> tucker: so tech companies are censoring speech in this country. where did they get the idea to do that? where did they get the techniques to do that? we are not making this up. it seems like we would have to be. directly from the communist party of china.

chinese nationals are heading up facebook in-house censorship teams. that story broke just minutes ago, we will speak to the man who broke at just ahead. so really, how are you? oh well, look! that's what we're both taking right now, fanapt. you know it's really been helping me manage my schizophrenia. i used to hear these terrible voices. loser! you're such a failure. you're so embarrassing. i used to feel like everyone was staring at me. but we're doing much better now, right? yeah. fanapt is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. in clinical trials, fanapt significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo. fanapt may change your heart rhythm which could elevate risk of sudden death. your doctor will consider this when deciding among treatments and may prescribe another medication first or may instruct you to take a smaller dosage of fanapt.

the good thing to know, is we're not alone. call 8557 fanapt

♪ >> tucker: there's new reporting tonight, it broke just moments ago that redefines what

we know about the crackdown now underway by big tech on our freedom of speech. facebook, the company, operates something called the hate speech engineering team. now, how do they know how to censor hate speech? well, at least half a dozen members of the in-house team are in fact chinese nationals in this country on h1b thesis. there building algorithms to censor where able to think on facebook. they've been very active in the past few days. this is a were markable story and we are pleased to know to be joined by the man who broke it. editor at "the new york post" and he joins us with details. thanks for coming on tonight. this is the kind of thing that if i saw it online i'm not sure i would believe it. you've done extensive reporting on this, tell us what you've learned. >> this is thanks to a facebook insider who came forward last week, a former employee, who was

alarmed by this censorship that facebook -- that "the new york post" suffered at the hands of facebook and he wanted to help us shed light on the people who are actually behind the mechanics of how stories get censored on facebook. and he shared with us the full directory of the people work on this orwellian named organization within facebook called hate speech engineering. most of them are based in seattle and as we learned, half of them -- i apologize -- half a dozen of them -- at least half a dozen of them are chinese nationals. and so there's -- that's such a -- on the surface of it it's alarming, but it's especially lame because it's okay for tech workers to come from foreign countries. a lot of them want to settle here and become american citizens share in the american dream. but as it is, many of them may not. many of them may go back so you wonder not only expertise they

bring from the most censorious society on earth here but then did they take their machine learning and algorithm expertise back to help xi jinping repress his own people? >> tucker: exactly. i mean, this is not just any nation. i think most people, even essentially immigration restriction nests like me love to see immigrants come here and thrive. of course we do, every american loves that but this is china. this is our main global rival. they consider us to be in an enemy. this seems like a national security thing to me. >> i think it does. and then another fact in all of this is these people could take back their expertise and help their own people -- their own -- xi jinping repress their own people. >> tucker: yes. has facebook comments on this? i mean, there section -- the symbolism of importing people from the most repressive big country on the planet to repress

our population, what's the reclamation for this? >> and especially -- he brought up the fact that the stories that are getting reduced and circulation involve china, right? because hunter biden is alleged to have made financial deals with chinese energy firms and what did they have to say about it? and they said look, we are proud to have a company with people from all over the world and any allegation that these people specifically shape policy are absurd. so they deny it. >> tucker: give me that -- i mean, hate speech is one of those terms that is entirely subjective. your hate speech is my truth and vice versa, how do they define hate speech? >> well, i mean, they have a broad set of guidelines of extremist views and so forth, but what the insider told me is they actually are on the lookout for what they call specifically

borderline content and the whole goal is as you're searching your newsfeed, there are certain things they consider quote unquote borderline content, which apparently includes no new york post reporting, reporting from the oldest newspaper in this country, which they then ensure that you see at last on your newsfeed, whereas other content that they want you to see for commercial reasons or whatever, and the same engineers, if they managed to get you to interact with it will then get bonuses according to this insider. given what we've seen in terms of how they treat "the new york post," which is a reputable newspaper, one of the largest newspapers in this country, it shows you hate speech engineering is a kind of orwellian euphemism. >> tucker: of course it is. thanks so much for joining us today. congrats on that scoop. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: extremism. what do they think extremism is? probably what you believe. what is extremism not? it's what they believe, so the idea that biological gender is

fake, that's not extremism. that you should be required to wear a mask of mom and her bicycle, not extremism. extremism. the justice department filed an antitrust lawsuit against google today, they alleged the use of anticompetitive tactics to preserve their monopoly in search and advertising. senator josh hawley has been one of the very few leaders in the republican party who has stood strong against the abuses of big tech. will this do anything to stop the censorship and the creeping power people are already too powerful? senator hawley joins us tonight. thanks so much for coming on. how do you assess this antitrust suit? >> it's a very big antitrust suit. this is the biggest antitrust case and a center to generation, maybe in a century. i have to say reading that case this morning, reading the case title, united states versus google, it may be want to say god bless america. that's got to be the most patriotic words that have been written down in a long time, united states versus google. i hope we will see united states

versus facebook really soon. what's at stake here is our democracy and who controls it. is it going to be citizens, voters, or is it going to be big tech? and as we've seen in the last few days, tech wants to run the elections, they want to run this democracy. they are trying to buy joe biden with all the money that they've spent on the biden campaign. this is about standing up to them and saying you cannot run america. >> tucker: that is exactly right. now, we've got two weeks before the election. you know, hoping that one party doesn't control the whole government, that would be a disaster, but it's possible that could happen, it's very possible the senate could go to democrats so in that two weeks, republican senators, the last hope i would think to stand up against the monopolies, plan to do anything to curtail the power of these companies? >> yeah, well, it's absolutely vital that the senate stand up and do something and that republicans lead the way and what needs to happen is we need to subpoena jack dorsey, we need to subpoena mark zuckerberg. we need to bring them in front of the judiciary committee and say "what are you doing? are you colluding with the biden

campaign? why are you suppressing the reporting in "the new york post"? why are you trying to interfere in an election? "we also need to pass legislation right now that would change that section 230, that immunity shield, allow americans to sue. if you get censored, you should be able to sue. we should hold big tech accountable and i've got to tell you, republicans have drugged their feet on this for years. years and years and years. establishment republicans have looked the other way. that's how tech has gotten powerful. now it's time to stand up and be counted. >> tucker: it's beyond belief. do you think that will change? i mean, you work among people or taking the side -- i hate to say this -- of google over their own voters. at what point will they wake up and realize that's wrong? >> one voters tell them that it is. when voters make clear if they are trying to do -- i mean, voters are trying to get politicians attention in every way they know how. the politicians just won't listen. that's what i found.

tech has bought so much influence on capitol hill, so much influence with think tanks and economists and staffers, it is unbelievable and the voice of the people is going to have to prevail over these paid sycophants, but that's the fight right now and republicans, they've got to stand up now. again, they have been complicit, many of them, and allowing the situation to get to where it is. it's time now to stand up and take some action. >> tucker: amen. they are also afraid or have been paid for. senator josh hawley, thanks so much. >> thank you. >> tucker: is so in good news tonight, thanksgiving is on the horizon, next month. unfortunately unless you classify your things giving dinner as a peaceful protest, maybe burn a wendy's while you're at it, the state of california doesn't want you to have it. there's some public-health guidance that may intrude on the most sacred of all family traditions. we will tell you more about that. adam corolla has details. the president is speaking to a big crowd in pennsylvania. we are monitoring it for you, we

will bring you any news the moment it happens. >> i withdrew from the last demonstration of osterman's disastrous iran nuclear deal. by the way, if and when we win my first call is going to be the heads of iran and they're going to say let's make a deal. their economy went from being strong, they were all over the world, terrorism, now their economy is totally tanks. ♪

>> may have to bite the bullet and sacrifice that social gathering and less you're pretty certain that the people that you're dealing with are not infected. >> tucker: that was tony fauc fauci, telling you you need to bite the bullet and sacrifice this thanksgiving, meaning give up centuries old tradition at the center of your family, the things that connect you to the people that you love. you have to give them up immediately because you're not, like, looting macy's in the name of blm, in which case are totally fine.

but sitting down with your wife and your children and your grandchildren, that's dangerous, stop it! says mr. fauci. the people's republic of china agrees with that strongly, they are in the business of [indiscernible] citizens from one another. officials are now saying residents need to hold things giving dinners outdoors, as if that's their business, separated by 6 feet between each person. it residents have to keep their masks on between bites and worst of all, shouting is "strongly discourage" because it "significantly increases the risk of covid-19 transmission." what's the point of thanksgiving without shouting? can you even have things giving without shouting? has adam corolla ever done it? the author of the book "on your emotional support animal: navigating are all woke, no joke culture." adam, thanks so much for joining us. would you be capable of having a thanksgiving dinner without shouting? >> no. i would not, as a matter of fact. that's the only way i

communicate with family members. i'm really like a quarterback calling omaha and audibles and then i move my foot and then my son picks up the gravy and he goes in motion. >> tucker: [laughs] i want to eat with you! did you ever think -- and this is not an effort to dismiss the seriousness of the pandemic, but did you ever think that a state would be in the business of telling you how to eat dinner? >> well, if it was going to be any state, it would be california and by the way, this sounds miserable. i mean, nothing says thanksgiving like sitting on a folding chair in your driveway and having a nurse fire mashed potatoes at you with a t-shirt cannon. >> tucker: [laughs] actually, you're making it sound kind of appealing now that you put it that way. but is there anything -- >> yeah. if there was one state --

>> tucker: yes? >> if there was one state that should do this, it is california, because we screw up thanksgiving anyway. the tofu casserole, gluten-free stuffing and a sheet cake frosted in the colors of the gay flag >> tucker: that sounds delicious! you've got to wonder if maybe this isn't some like elaborate gag that gavin newsom has pulled off, like let's see what we can make them do. tell them to wear a mask between bites! it somewhat like simon says in the instructions become progressively more ludicrous. is there a point at which they will just stop for people who rebel? >> gavin newsom won't sleep until every citizen, every taxpayer sets sail for nashville or texas and there's only the homeless to break the bread with. so that's going to be at next year. >> tucker: to these -- i wonder if these restrictions apply to the homeless.

they seem curiously immune from government regulation. >> no. they don't do a lot of complying. part of the unwritten ethos of sleeping on the sidewalk and defecating into trash cans. not a big comply her, not a big rule follower. my tip is everyone in california should just invite every family member and every friend over to their home, sit in the living room and have a turkey and if there's a knock on the door and the authorities want to know what you're doing, tell them you're having a blm rally. >> tucker: [laughs] and then, by the way, go ahead and loot macy's, because it's allowed now. adam corolla joining us from the collapsing state of california. great to see you tonight, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: well, joe biden's tax plan is out, at least his outline and not everyone is impressed. one who's deftly not impressed is the wrapper 50 cent.

he's endorsed donald trump. he is worried - -- what in fact would joe biden's tax plan have on americans? we will give you some sense straight ahead. sickle prop 19 provides tax savings for family homes.

so i'm voting 'yes'. nineteen allows seniors and all homeowners 55 and older to transfer their home's low tax base to another home. it also protects the right to pass my family home to my son. we've all worked hard for our house and we should be allowed to give it to our kids without a tax penalty. it's time to limit taxes. vote 'yes' on 19.

♪ >> tucker: the president just wrapping up his rally in erie, pennsylvania, tonight. he's been all over the country the past few days, joe biden is not. he's -- who knows what he's doing. he's not on the road, that's for sure. speaking of joe biden, he's got a tax plan and it could be very bad news for his base. who is joe biden's base? the people funding his campaign, rich people in left-wing states like california, new jersey and new york city. they could face -- and we are not exaggerating here -- combined state and federal and in some case local tax rates of over 60%. do they know what they are supporting? by the way, none of them will ever pay that. their money is offshore. but you've got to wonder how biden's tax plan would affect the rest of us. peter navarro is the trade advisor at the white house.

we are happy to have a montagnais. thanks so much for coming on. so give us the fax-based overview of this plan if you would. >> fact based. we've seen this movie before. we had a higher tax regime during the obama-biden administration for eight years. what we got was slow growth, which was the so-called new normal and stagnant wages. we saw one president trump did the tax cut plan, we saw in two years and immediate jump in income, wages going up, particularly for blue-collar workers and a bunch of investment coming onshore into our country. what the likely outcome of this program would be would be to catch a lot of small businesses in the net that operates what's called [indiscernible] and would make more than 400,000 small business, so that would crush

them and then for the ordinary folk, the lower and middle income people, they would pay that tax through slower growth because of lower investment. so elections have consequences. i would simply say that be careful what you vote for, because this is not a good idea. >> tucker: i mean, if you can devise a tax to tax the people who are funding the chaos we are going through, the left-wing billionaires who are paying for almost every thing that going on, i would be behind that, but you know they will never pay more. so really in this minute and have we have left, you gave a remarkable speech on china the other day, i think it was yesterday, will you sum up what you set for our audience? >> we've got essentially a family fight going on during a home invasion and the metaphor of the family fight is as americans we are fighting each other on partisan grounds in the home invader is the chinese communist party, which kills 50,000 americans a year with

sentinel and has killed over 200,000 americans with their virus, put us out of work and they are coming at us, tucker. the essence of the speech, i call it the useful idiots speech, what [indiscernible] used to call people who help the cause and what we have now as we have hollywood, nba stars, with got the mainstream media all helping advance the chinese communist party narrative that chinese authoritarianism trumps american democracy and shame on them, so i would just urge folks to go take a look at the whole thing, but that's it in 30 seconds. >> tucker: no, it's worth hearing and it's worth hearing those ideas crystallized as crisply as you just did. peter navarro, thank you for coming on tonight. >> take care, tucker. >> tucker: well, there's a new piece out on the internet called "abolishing the police" and it has the name of former nfl

quarterback, [indiscernible]. the essay is being widely read and of course becomes required reading at your kids school, someone should tell you what's in it. we will do that after the break. ♪

>> tucker: colin kaepernick may be the most oppressed millionaire in the world. there are many vying for that title. this country leads the world in oppressed millionaires and they are nothing compared to the oppressed billionaires. now colin kaepernick is an author. he writes an essay describing a world with no police or prisons. a world grounded in meeting the meetings of people. abolition now. the prose is moving. how long until the nfl bans

police from their stadiums? this woman knows more about the police who authored "the war on cops," and we are happy to have heather mcdonald on tonight. can you imagine a world like this? >> i don't have to imagine it because we are seeing it. kaepernick says the intent of policing is to kill blacks. i challenge every police chief to invite kaepernick for ride alongs with their anti-gang unit and offer kaepernick a month's worth of free housing in the projects. we will see if kaepernick concludes that the problem is the police and not crim names. -- criminals.

if kaepernick doesn't have the balls to do the ride alongs or live in a housing project instead of his mansion, he needs to only go to a community meeting and ask people if they want to abolish the people. he will hear not on your life. 80% of blacks in this country want more police presence in their communities. what we are seeing in the summer of riots is terrifying. a one-year-old was shot in kansas city. a 9-year-old was shot at a family gathering -- these are fatal shootings -- in sacramento. a 15-year-old boy shot in st. louis and a 15-year-old girl shot in chicago. nearly two people a day are

killed in st. louis. and one person every two hours shot in chicago. we are already abolishing the police thanks to this phoney narrative about police racism. kaepernick should live this for a day and then write his damn manifesto. >> sean: -->> tucker: do you think legislation would get the support of democrats in congress? why wouldn't it? >> of course not. they don't want to give up their own private security details. the same thing with the colleges. the students are engaged in fits of self-righteous protests calling for abolishing campus police. the campuses in inner city

neighborhood, when crimes goes up, we will see how fast the colleges turn on a dime. they carry about the filthy tuition dollars they are extorting from parents. anybody calling for abolishing the police is living in a fantasy world and has no understanding and no sympathy for the law aaaoo abiding blacks who know the break down is in family. >> sean: how have they not silenced you? it's great to have you while you can still speak freely. heather mcdonald, a pleasure. we are out of time.

back tomorrow night. the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think. have a great evening. sean hannity takes over now. >> sean: welcome. a fox news alert. a senior law enforcement official is telling fox news that the fbi and the doj concur that hunter biden's laptops and emails are not part of any russian disinformation campaign. let me repeat to the media mob and the democratic party that is russia obsessed, we can report that the emails detailing the biden's family sketchy international business deals are not part of any russian