this story continues over the next several days and we will be with you all through it, will next see you sunday night at 6:00, bret baier and i have you to countdown to election day coverage, good night, everybody, have a great night. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." the president in the final days of this race is a nonstop rally mode, crisscrossing the country all day. he's doing it tonight. for five years, we have watched the news media treat donald trump in a way that no american president has ever been treated. richard nixon himself, disgraced, impeached, forced from office in the end got a pass by comparison the donald trump. reporters hate trump with an all-consuming mania. they hate him so intensely that at times it's been amusing to watch. if donald trump announced a cure

for cancer, cnn would denounce him for fixing drug prices -- that's true. if you're a fair-minded person, it has been infuriating to watch this, it's too dishonest. it's also patronizing because it's almost unbelievably stupid. "trump works for a pollutant, trump is a racist because he likes borders and doesn't want to live in haiti!" clearly all the smart kids went into finance, the americas websites tv stations got the rest. we have to live with the consequences of that. we should also say if we are being entirely honest that as grating as all of this is, unremitting hostility to the president of the united states is far from the greatest threat america faces. reporters are supposed to be tough on people with power, that's why we have journalism to keep a close eye on those with outsized influence on our lives. the people we should watch carefully would include business moguls, the intel agencies, prominent academics, cultural figures, military leaders, and

most obviously our politicians. the rest of us can't really know what these people, the people in charge, are doing at all times. a reporter's job is to find out. in the end, the real threat to america isn't too many nasty questions from reporters, it's the opposite of that. the real threat is collusion. when journalists strike secret alliances with the very people they are supposed to be holding accountable, we are in deep trouble. lies go unchallenged. democracy -- we learned the fbi is conducting an active investigation into joe biden's son for business deals that apparently include his father, the former vice president. that is not speculation, it is confirmed. a former biden business partner tony bobulinski sat with a five hour interview with six fbi agents just the other day a week ago. if they ask him about his business dealings in china with the biden family.

we don't know if this investigation will result in indictments, obviously -- we know it could. that's significant because joe biden is running for president. by any possible measure, this is a blockbuster stop the presses news story. it's not some naughty picture from somebody's laptop, this is a criminal investigation into business deals that we know for a fact joe biden was party to, why haven't you heard more about this? if you don't watch this channel, you've likely heard nothing at all, not a word and you know why because the media are collaborating. they are collaborating with the democratic party, they are collaborating with the intelligence agencies that spy on americans with impunity. they are collaborating with the tech monopolies that have choked off the average person's access to legitimate information. we aren't overstating any of that, we wish we were. watch the people we are supposed to be able to trust dismiss a completely legitimate, verified news story as "a russian plot." >> holding super-spreader events

and giving russian disinformation, spreading russian disinformation. >> disinformation that he knows to be fabricated and supplied by a foreign intelligence service and despite the warning, he still doing it. >> this entire thing is so obviously a russian plot. >> it's sort of a crazy quilt at this point which has all the hallmarks of russian disinformation. that said, it wasn't for lack of trying. >> basically functioning as a russian asset by pushing russian disinformation. >> the authorities are seeing if those emails are connected to an ongoing russian disinformation effort. this >> tucker: it has all the hallmarks of russian disinformation. these people wouldn't know russian disinformation if it got into the shower with them, they know nothing. every word of what they just said is a lie. russia didn't forge these

emails, vladimir putin didn't invent the two separate meetings that tony bobulinski had with joe biden to discuss business with joe biden. that's all entirely real, it happened, it is happening now and the people you just watched on the screen know that it did. yet they are telling you it's all fake, a concoction of a hostile foreign power. you have to ask yourself at some point, why would they tell you that? they know it's not true, they are saying it anyway. they are expecting you to believe it, why are they doing that? these people are not your allies. they are not trying to help you or inform you, just the opposite. these people are your enemies. they are misleading you so you will obey. maybe it will work, maybe they will get joe biden elected president without even asking the most basic questions or betting them in any way. that can work, it's a gambit, but what then? many of these people you just

saw on the screen will go to work for biden officially, we would expect that because without donald trump to hyperventilate over, the business models at many news outlets will collapse and these people will need jobs. joe biden and kamala harris can't hire everyone at nbc, some of these people have to continue to be "journalists." and the question is can they really do that? can they keep pretending on the screen live every night after everything we have just witnessed? "the new york post" miranda devine joins us on what is a real story. >> we have continually, every single day, we have the liberal media colluding with big tech and the intelligence agencies to cover up a story about joe biden which shows that he is corrupt or has been corrupt and the evidence has piled up, you've

reported, you did the interview with tony bobulinski, we reported at "the new york post" on the material that was on hundred biden's laptop. it all points to joe biden's involvement in his families influence peddling scheme in china and ukraine and other countries. this is a legitimate story, we've had nothing from joe biden because of course, he doesn't have to answer these allegations are answer these questions, he's not being asked. because of the rest of the media is running interference for him, they are accusing us, "the new york post" and you as well and tony bobulinski of being agents of russia and peddling russian disinformation. i just think this is not journalism and any journalist who is complicit in this cover-up, this corrupt cover-up ought to resign.

>> tucker: i saw an anchor at cnn on social media call for "the new york post" to erase its stories off social media. call for "the new york post" to become complicit in its own censorship. i never thought i would live to the age were a news anchor, a journalist, a reporter would say something like that. what do you make of it? >> that's jake tapper. "the new york post" were locked out for two weeks by twitter, only tonight has twitter been kind enough to let us have our account back. for two weeks, we were held hostage by jack dorsey, the head of twitter who said we could only get our account back if we deleted the tweets pointing to our stories about hundred biden's laptop. there was nothing inaccurate in those tweets, those stories were

not hacked material as everyone now admits. initially we were locked out because twitter had said we violated their hacked material rules, they went on us until we deleted those completely blameless tweets. we refused to do that because we have integrity and honor and jake tapper obviously has other ideas, he said we could have just made it all go away and we could have had our account back if we just deleted the tweets and did what would her wanted and we could retreat something else afterwards. which is so pathetic -- that tells you that the rest of the media is not aware of the danger of censorship from these all-powerful organizations that control the channels of information that we all use. the proof of that is that now more than half of americans

think that the hundred biden laptop story is russian disinformation. so it's worked and this is right before an election campaign. real evidence of corruption that points to joe biden being involved in this influence peddling scheme making millions of dollars with his family out of selling out this country to china in particular and to ukraine and that has been covered up by the media and censored by big tech. other journalists think that's okay. >> tucker: just like him i just betray your conscience, just go along with what they want you to do, mouthing the words and will not give you your social media account back. it's orwellian. miranda devine, thank you so much. where's everyone's dignity gone? the partisan media outlets are not the only institutions in the ad states working hard to rig

the election and its outcome. our next guest believe tech monopolies have the power to sway millions of votes in one direction, we've got the research on this spirit of we'll to talk to them after the break. ♪ - hello, i'm michael youssef.

you know, the covid-19 virus has infected millions around the world, but the virus that has infected every human being on the face of the earth is called sin, and the only vaccine against that virus is the blood of jesus christ shed on the cross. will you come to him for healing? - [announcer] find out more today. visit us online at findingtruepeace.com. that's findingtruepeace.com.

♪ >> tucker: when we first heard someone suggest years ago that the big tech companies, now the monopolies might intervene on behalf of a candidate in an american election, it seemed far-fetched. now it seems obvious that is happening, no question. so far tech monopolies have censored reporting on the by the family, they silenced politicians they don't like, they'd be plat formed any user who deviates from a narrowly prescribed a set of approved ideas. they also have other, less obvious ways to influence the election. google can offer a biased search suggestion and does. youtube gets to pick the next video you watch, what's the effect of all of this? much more profound than anything any foreign country is doing to us.

dr. robert epstein has been studying tech and its effect on politics for years, he's expressed concern about the power of tech monopolies on this show, he did it two years ago. >> we should be paranoid because what google and facebook can do is really mind-boggling. if, for example, mark zuckerberg on election day last year, if he had chosen to press the enter key early morning and just sent out a message to hillary clinton supporters only saying "go out and vote, go out and vote reminder." that would have sent her an additional 450,000 voters that day with no one knowing this had occurred. >> tucker: when you control all the information, you control what people know and believe, you control people's minds. what's the practical effect of that control four days out from a presidential election and is there anything we could do about it? doctor, thanks so much for

coming on. first to the practical effects, what do you think big tex interference would do to the election results? >> based on the data come up what we are seeing is the president nationwide, they are probably shifting this year in the selection 15 million votes without anyone's awareness except for what i'm doing without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. >> tucker: how are they doing that? >> they are doing it with bias in search results which basically no one can see, it would be very tough to see. we've been measuring that now with about 600 field agents in the swing states and just based on the first hundred 50,000 searches that we've looked at, that's about 1.5 million search results and over a million

web pages, we are finding very substantial pro-liberal bias in all ten or at least 9 out of 10 search results on the first page of google search results, strong liberal bias. not on being or yahoo and we are seeing that bias in every demographic group. and one report we generated recently, we saw more liberal bias in google content going to conservatives than going to liberals. >> tucker: interesting. that is the depositio definitiof propaganda, tailoring information to change the views of people in a targeted way. it's immoral, and election interference, it' is it illegal? we have campaign finance laws, don't we? >> there is no specific laws or regulations in place stopping a company like google from doing

things like this and they said they can exercise their free speech rights and to show people anything they want to show people. you could look at this as an extreme violation of campaign finance laws. in effect, they are making huge in-kind donations to one party, one candidate, it doesn't cost them a dime but that's not the issue. the issue is what would it cost you to do it or what would it cost me to do it and we are talking tens of millions of dollars at least. >> tucker: one of the reasons this is so corrosive is because it's so difficult to measure and it makes everybody paranoid and distrustful and undermines confidence in the system because you can't see it, as you said. how do we prevent the replay of this not just to stop helping democrats, for the sake of our collective confidence in our system? >> i think there's only one way to do it, i don't think laws and regulations can keep up with

tech. i've been in touch with a lot of members of congress, a lot of attorneys general, they are all very frustrated. i think we do it with monitoring systems, with large scale nielsen type monitoring systems. we have more than 600 field agents this year in the swing states, we will probably have seven or 800 by election day and what happens in that case is with their permission, we are using software to look over their shoulders and see what these tech companies, google, yahoo, facebook and more -- see what these tech companies are showing them. real people, they have to be real people, republicans, democrats, independents and we aggregate that data and we look for shenanigans. we look for targeted messages. we look for bias and we are doing it on a massive scale and preserving that information. i think that is how you defend democracy. >> tucker: i agree with that completely, they must hate you and that is a badge of honor.

dr. robert epstein, thank you for coming on tonight. there are new concerns tonight about the very real dangers, the health effects of locking down schools for the coronavirus. senior correspondent rick leventhal has the latest on that story. >> several studies reaching the same conclusion, in person schooling is better for kids that home schooling and pretty much every way, most importantly putting kids in class does not impact the spread of the coronavirus. one study by yale university of 57,000 child care providers found there were no differences in the percentage of them got covid with their facilities open and those with facilities closed. no heightened risk from working with kids. a spanish study found no increase in infections in teachers or kids who went back to school and those who didn't. one researcher said what we found is the school being open makes absolutely no difference in the number of cases. another researcher in a similar

study in 191 countries discovered the same thing. with the data suggests is that opening schools does not inevitably lead to increased case numbers. pediatricians say they are seeing far more negative impacts from keeping kids out of class suffering mental health problems, hunger, obesity due to an activity, missing routine medical care and a greater risk of abuse, reasons for going to school included meals, physical activity, health care, and a far improved education. consistent findings of no spikes for students or teachers and more harmful effects for those who stayed home. seven states, d.c., and puerto rico still have full or partial closures in effect. >> tucker: rick leventhal, thank you so much. if biden is elected, he has promised to continue in some way to shut down and changes in american life with regard to the virus. a new hollywood thriller gives

us some sense of what might be like, dr. marc siegel joins us to discuss it. plus international television star and man of mystery don lemon says he cannot be friends with people who disagree with him because they are like crack cocaine addicts. don lemon is against that. ♪ i am a good parent. jared? i'm hearing the most awful things, people shouting at me. it's ok. when you live with schizophrenia like us, it can feel like you're living in a different world. you should definitely talk to your doctor and ask about fanapt. ok. fanapt is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. in clinical trials, fanapt significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo.

cynthia, are you ok? i feel like everyone's out to get me. fanapt may change your heart rhythm which could elevate risk of sudden death. your doctor will consider this when deciding among treatments and may prescribe another medication first or may instruct you to take a smaller dosage of fanapt. remember you're not alone, there is help. call 8557 fanapt

>> tucker: dr. anthony fauci of washington, d.c., may be old but he's busy. he has plans for you, detailed plans. if he wants you to wear a mask, he wants you to stop shaking hands with one another after 3,000 years. he wants to cancel thanksgiving and probably the rest of the holiday season too. get used to it because dr. anthony fauci believes it may be years before we get back to normal, if ever.

what would that look like exactly? this new fauci designed society? a new movie called songbird by director michael bay speculates about that, take a look. >> all unauthorized citizens must stay indoors. >> tensions rise as we enter the 215th week of lockdown. >> it has mutated to. >> beginning thermal scan. >> new data confirms the virus attacks the brain tissue. >> i'm immune! >> tucker: dr. marc siegel is a fox news medical contributor, the author of the new book covid, the politics of fear and the power of science and an expert in social control. great to see you tonight, what do you think of this vision of our future? >> it's scary. fear corrodes and we have enough fear as i write in my book

without having made up fear forced on us, thrust on us and that's why i'm working on a novel about bioengineered virus but i put it on the shelf because i don't want to inflict any more fear. the biggest fear monger of them all, alfred hitchcock, was asked how dare you scare everybody with the birds, psycho, people with blood pressures going up and know what he said? he said you get to turn the camera off and go home after the movie. you don't get to go home here and michael bay should listen to that before he dumps -- jumps into deep water. he should stick with transformers. he's talking about a major mutation occurring with covid-19 and it becomes covid 23 and the world is wiped out. i talked to the head of the nih last night who said this virus is not mutating in that direction. it is not becoming more severe. meanwhile in michael bay's movie, you have a virtual reality where the couples meet.

they meet virtually, they have a virtual relationship. we talked about this, zoom meetings with masks on, there's one person in particular i want to say should have worn an entire face mask if you know what i mean and of course other people are suggesting that people wear masks during sex -- virtual marriage? how do you make a virtual baby? what would a virtual baby look like? >> tucker: i don't know, i'm pretty sure it's sexist of you to doubt that it's possible but that's just me. great to see you, thank you. no one wants to say the truth which is a secular society cannot handle a pandemic like this because a secular society denies that death is real and when it's in your face, people melt down. the president issued an

executive order to make it easier to fire federal workers, you're more likely to die in a federal job and you are to be fired to. a new documentary called to the plot against the president details how national security officials worked to oust their boss behind the scenes, here's a clip. >> there was an illusion being created using the most awesome tools and the greatest tricks of the american intelligence community, how it was being deployed against the american people. >> the things they were investigating the trump campaign for is what they themselves were doing. not just the democratic party and their operatives but also the fbi. >> the entire time this is going on, they thought this was going to be what sunk the donald trump presidency and they were just looking for the golden goose and they still haven't found it. >> tucker: you don't have to support trump to be terrified by what is happening, she's a former state department official in the trump administration, she's one of the people behind this documentary.

thanks so much for coming on. you worked there, you saw this, this is the definition of undermining democracy, you made this documentary i presume because you saw it. >> for two reasons. i saw it on a smaller level and observed it through people i knew in the administration on a larger level and of the reason was because russia gate is something people wish us to forget, it seems like the whole country had to be put in this transfer they believed something that wasn't real and it needs to be stopped. this didn't actually happen and we need to acknowledge that. and the executive order, it's really one of the best things the president could do to counteract this culture of subversion that is very prevalent in the federal government. >> tucker: it's always the big crimes that go unpunished.

after spending all the time that you did making this film, were you more convinced or less convinced that russia gate, the hoax about russian interference hurt the country, what the affected have? >> it has major national security implications and this is what i did see personally and up close when i was working at the state department and around other bureaucracies. it's not that they just convinced a very large part of the american public that the president was a russian asset, they convinced a great deal of government employees that was the case too. these people were going home at night and listening to cnn -- when they come in to work, they feel like they have a false imperative to do their own thing and disregard the instructions from the commander-in-chief and the chain of command and there's nothing really more dangerous than convincing the entire federal government that the president is a foreign asset. i don't think people have really

dealt with the national security implications of that. >> tucker: and convincing that russia is the greatest threat we face which it is not to. do you think they really believe that? that wasn't fake if they believed it. >> i don't know what these people believe, all i know is they got just as much information as devin nunes did who was willing to go out and say there is no russian collusion, there's no evidence of that and even on your show, i remember watching it when adam schiff would come out of those briefings and to sit here and say he had evidence of russian collusion. all i know is what they say on the media and i know they were lying. i think it's time the whole country knew that. >> tucker: and to hold some people accountable for the big crimes of this is one of the biggest crimes, i'm glad you came on tonight and congratulations on this great film. we got a fox news alert for you, two police officers abused in new orleans, breaking malcolm a fox rick leventhal is on it for

us. >> they were ambushed on routine patrol in the french quarter when they were fired on by a passenger in a petty cap. this gunman shot at both officers who were in their vehicle and hit both of them, one officer was shot in the left cheek, the bullet is now lodged in his skull according to the police chief down there, he is in serious but stable condition. the second received minor abrasions to his arm. the suspect again of firing weapon from a petty cab. if he was apprehended near the intersection of st. peter and decatur street, witnesses in the area according to the associated press were able to identify and point out the suspect. a witness at a nearby shop said they heard several loud popping noises and people heard the gunfire, some people saw the gunman and pointed them out to responding officers but we have two police officers ambushed in the french quarter by a passenger in a petty cab, one of

them shot in the cheek in stable condition, another with wounds to his arm. >> tucker: horrifying, rick leventhal -- thank you. of course the word was ambushed, not abused. if what to crack addicts and trump supporter's have in common? quite a bit according to cnn. international man of mystery don lemon explains in adam corolla response to his explanation ne next.

♪ >> tucker: international television sensation mr. don lemon isn't simply a widely blood cable news anchor, he is not simply this generation's mr. rourke from this generation's fantasy island, he's also a spiritual leader and he has some advice for this country, it's time to overlook our differences and unite. >> people have to stop being so judgmental and become curious about other people's lives. pick up the phone on a weekend and say what you doing, you want

to meet, you want to meet have wings, you want to go out on the boat, you want to go fishing? we want to come over. the real difference comes with relationships and not just lip service. >> i think that is so beautiful he said. >> tucker: so beautifully said that she is a life really. he's giving you a message of love and unity. even love and unity messages have limits and in the case of mr. lemon, that limit this people who might vote for someone who's not voting for because they are like crackheads. >> there are a lot of friends i had to really get rid of because they are so nonsensical when it comes to this issue. they have every single talking point that they hear on state tv and they hear from this president they repeat it and they are blinded by it. if i think they have to hit rock bottom like an addict and they have to want to get help and i've got to let them go and if they're willing to come back and

if they are willing to live in reality, then i welcome them with open arms. but i can't do it anymore. >> tucker: adam corolla is the author of the sensational book "on your emotional support animal" which he is -- he joins us tonight. i was planning on mocking this and making fun of it but i listen to it again and it's disturbing. here you have don lemon on television saying i had some friends i had to get rid of. does this make you feel like we should call authorities, what does it mean to get rid of them? >> they are in a base somewhere. i have some thoughts. one is, you know how everyone on the left is constantly accusing republicans of being scared of people who look different than we do, which is insane. i think people on the left are scared of people who think different from they do. >> tucker: why do you think that is?

people aren't o afraid to engage with others who disagree. >> obviously it's insecurity and projection but think about this. republicans are racist and homophobic, don lemon is black and -- doesn't that shoot a hole in his point of calling all trump voters racist and homophobic and the black gay man is cutting them loose because they think differently? >> tucker: what it even occurred to you to do this, you've got political views, i'm not exactly sure what they are, it doesn't occur to me to end friendships over those views not because they aren't real views, they are. >> what if you spent the last

four years for people building the case for all those people being hitler and homophobic and misogynistic, you would have to by law, by personal decree, you would have to get rid of those people because they are bad people. there aren't people who think differently from you, they are bad people and you can cut them loose. if you are playing chess with someone who can beat you at chess but you label him a racist and you win the game. >> tucker: if he really thought someone was so evil you couldn't be friends with him, why wouldn't you hurt that person? seriously? >> mostly because these people are soft pacifists who couldn't hurt anybody. >> tucker: i guess that's our one protection. there are tw too beta to threatn us -- a reassuring point. thank you.

one unexpected twist in this race full of unexpected twists is that donald trump is getting praise from some of the world's most famous rappers. kanye west, 50-cent, th -- all e expressed some degree of support for the president, not everyone is happy about that. why? jason whitlock after the break. - hello, friends. michael youssef here.

you know, the right says that christ was conservative. the left says christ was radical, but christ is the creator, god in human flesh, and he's the only one who can give you peace, and he wants to give you that peace, eternal peace. will you come to him? - [woman] are you looking for peace that can withstand any hardship that life can bring? visit findingtruepeace.com to find answers. that's findingtruepeace.com.

>> any demographic group voting that much in favor of one party sort of raises questions. >> tucker: that's one of our

favorite rap stars, on this show a year ago tonight he expressed his concerns about the changing political atmosphere. he is one of a handful of rappers who have faced a backlash for thinking for themselves and define democratic party orthodoxy, another example is wrapper little wayne who visited the white house yesterday after tweeting out support for donald trump. that did not go over well on the internet, he was attacked pretty progressively as a sellout as others have before him. 50-cent endorse the president because of his tax policy, he said he didn't want to become 20 sent. >> you heard his support of donald trump. >> i saw your tweets and i go what's happening? >> he doesn't want to pay $0.50 in taxes, i had to remind them

that he was a black person, so he can't vote for donald trump and he shouldn't be influencing an entire swath of people that may listen to him. >> tucker: dam is one thing, eric and is another but to be dumb and arrogant together is pretty unappealing. jason whitlock is another one of those things, he's a partner at out kick.com, why the mania about trying to force certain people to stay in their prescribed lane? why not ignore it and let us go? and some rapper wants to vote for trump, who cares? but they do care, why? >> because white liberals being honest like chelsea handler think it's their job to control, maintain, limit the amount of freedom that black people enjoy here in america. we are supposed to be beholden and dependent upon them and it threatens them when people like

little wayne, ice cube, 50-cent, any of these guys stray from their prescription or course of action that they want to take. it threatens them and it's her job as a modern-day overseer to whip us back in line. it really is that simple. >> tucker: she's disempowered by this because little wayne who she imagines she has some kind of authority over -- him disobeying her means that she is less powerful? >> it means that he is more powerful. i honestly believe that not all but there are a lot of white liberals who are threatened by the independence and self-determination of black people. they want us dependent upon th

them. there is a superiority complex, there is a "you guys can't do it without us" complex and there is we want your vote and we want you in line with the feminist agenda, we want to meld the two off the back of oppression and we want to advance all of these other things that have nothing to do with black people. >> tucker: the feminist agenda -- i'm not sure what you're saying but i have a feeling it's close to the heart of this, can you explain that a little bit? >> the greatest beneficiaries of the civil rights movement and a lot of people's view and certainly in mind has been white women. i'll go a step further. women have advanced off of the oppression of black people, white women in particular and i'm just going to go all the way there, i think we are now seeing the lgbtq community latch on to

black oppression and try to use it to advance their cause. anybody that strays from those agendas and that support, any person, black person that puts their advancement and their priorities ahead of the feminist movement, and the lgbt movement is going to face stiff repercussions over social media in particular and there's going to be celebrities, white and black that are used like attack dogs to make sure certain black men and others stay in line with the movement that the elite liberals want us to stick to and that is the matriarchy, the empowerment of women, and the empowerment of the lgbt community. >> tucker: you are not allowed to say any of that which makes me think -- i want to hear more

about it. it almost sounds like some of the people who were jumping up and down and making the most noise about how deeply they care about black people may not actually care quite as much as they say they do. >> one of the biggest mistakes we as black people make is we mistake affinity, affection for respect and freedom. affinity is not a substitute for respect. affinity a lot of times and affection has almost everything to do with the giver. we understand affection, that pleasures the giver as much if not more than the receiver. respect pleasures to receiver and reveals the character of the giver and so i think one of the biggest mistakes that we as black people make, we say oh, my god, they like us. that doesn't mean they respect or have our best interests at heart, what it means is they

like the pleasure they receive from the show of affection. >> tucker: that's a very deep point and i think a lot of us make that mistake. i'm glad you came tonight, thank you for that. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: not just a sports >> sean: welcome to "hannity." if 4 days you the american people will decide and president trump is fighting for every vote. today in michigan, wisconsin and minnesota. over the final 3 days, he will hold a whopping 14 rallies including 4 tomorrow in the state of pennsylvania. on sunday, the president will hold 5 rallies. 1 in michigan. iowa, north carolina and georgia and florida. on monday the president will have 5 more rallies including stops in