in a long career, that was one of the highlights. and that's it for today. have a great week and we'll see you next "fox news sunday." ♪ ♪ ♪ mark: hello america i am mark live-in and this is life liberty and live-in. before we get started this evening i want to make a comment. i watched this clip of barack obama on 60 minutes where he is attacking the president of the united states and believes these challenges that are taking place in the states are undermining democracy. he has put out an 800 page book and you would think he was

winston churchill and i think this is his third autobiography and i want to say something to president obama. the other so-called iconic figures in our republic, republican and democrat, don't you damn lecture us. for four damn years we left the fbi involved in trying to undermanned the president and the intelligence services, trying to undermine this president. they tried to remove this president from office, a phony criminal investigation, phony impeachment. one effort after the other and the russia hoax, you drag the morgan people through the dirt through your politics because he wouldn't accept democracy and would not accept the constitution of the united states and now everybody is supposed to roll over. 72 million people voted for this president and after 72 million people don't like what they are seeing right now and let me explain the problem to the media. you are going around inputting microphones in the faces of state officials. do you see any fraud here?

ducey brought here? there is a defendant in these lawsuits. the good old days we would have reporters in the field looking into the allegations where we have hundreds of sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury from one end of this country to another and one corrupt democrat city after another. machines will not allow our volunteer lawyers to get in and find out what is taking place. this is hard work. instead the media are fighting them and we have democrats fighting them and propaganda fighting them rather than trying to get to the bottom of this. al gore has 37 days and frivolous lawsuits in three counties, two visits to the state supreme court, two visits to the united states supreme court and will be here is people, people declaring who are not involved in the cases and have not talked to anybody that it's over. it's over. it may be over and it may not be

over but what about the integrity of the election process? let me explain in part was going on in this country. democrats and their surrogates and hundreds of lawsuits leading up to the selection, what did they do? earlier and earlier voting. why? why? i will get to that in a second read mail in ballots, why? ballot harvesting, why? no signatures, no postal market dates, extended vote counting, none of this is about good government and nothing is about the integrity of the election and they are enshrining and institutionalizing fraud. they are destroying the security measures that exist and the reason they want early and early voting in later and later counting and more and more mail in votes is because when you show up to vote the chances of fraud are minimal. there is election judges and registration and you have to show your address in your name and you have to show an id and so forth. if you have a male in both that you don't even have to sign and you don't have a postal date on

it you have no security whatsoever and so basically what is going on here is the democrat party, which has created these conditions for the first time in many states, that's why this is going on and on not because the challenges but because of the changes in the election of soul the democrat party says it's over and they push out joe biden in the office of the president elect we don't have an office of the president elect. we have one president at a time and joe biden is undermining that president, donald trump. we don't have two foreign policies at the same time. we don't have two environmental policies at the same time. they are the ones undermining democracy and finally, they are the ones announcing how they will destroy our constitution. they say hurry up. we are undermining democracy. if they win the races in georgia they will destroy the supreme court and destroyed the senate and destroyed the legislative process and destroy the

electoral college. they will cut out the red states from voting but we are undermining democracy. no. obama is undermining democracy. biden is undermining democracy. their whole damn party is undermining democracy and it is about time the media in this country pay attention to what the hell is going on, go into the cities. follow the volunteer lawyers and see exactly what is taking place and give us a hand so we can protect the right to vote and the franchise. now, i've said enough. we have a tremendous guest, tremendous guest who will have an opportunity to speak. kayleigh mack and any for purposes of our discussion is the campaign advisor to the trunk campaign for it how are you? >> i'm doing great, mark. that was well said. mark: i wanted you to come of the program for several reasons but number one, you are a trained lawyer and you graduated from harvard law school and number two, you are an extraordinarily smart individual

and people do not give you an opportunity to speak whether at a press conference or other places. number three, you have compiled what is significant evidence of fraud, not an e-mail that says look at this, we have 200,000 ballots. that is not the way it works. you've got to find instances of fraud, patterns and follow them. we don't have a subpoena power like the government does. what have you found? give us some examples. >> quite a bit, mark. you hit the nail on the head that for a long time, for decades in these democrat run cities they have designed a system that no one has challenged where it has been rife with fraud rate i have hundreds of pages of affidavits here michigan alone where they saw ballots going through machines multiple times and where they saw when a name was not matched or found in the voter record they were logged in with the birth date january january 11900 and example after example in this is an old system

and an old fraudulent system and it took this president winning new states like pennsylvania and michigan to finally challenge the old system but more than even instances of fraud we found, mark. you hit the nail back in september. you called this. democrat secretaries of states around this country redesigning our election system flouting the state legislators who under article one section four has the power to determine the time, manner and place of election were flawed in that in changing and redesigning a system, nevada no greater example when they did the mass mail out voting in the primary unit ballots languishing in trash cans and what did they do in the general election? mail out ballots across the state and across the country when you look at these states and the way they've been sending them out. our lawyers have tried to look at this, it sending live ammunition across the country that was bound to be harnessed and used in a fraudulent manner and make no mistake, it was. mark: kayleigh, all of these

changes are intended to help the democrat party prayed all of them. they don't improve the voting system and they don't improve the integrity of the vote. they certainly don't help the republicans, who mostly vote in person where they have all these checks and balances in place. it is not the republicans talking about if we win one election we will destroy the judiciary and destroyed the united states senate and so forth. yet, you can see that thomas friedman types in the media and the democrats all speak in one voice demanding that we hurry up, hurry up, hurry up. the u.s. attorney general takes months and years to bring one tax fraud case. you are talking about at least six states with massive populations where these volunteer lawyers working for the trump campaign have to find ways to interview individuals who make allegations and there is no subpoena powers and so forth. they say let's hurry up, hurry

up, hurry up. they want to hurry up because they want to kill this, don't they? >> that's exactly right. it takes time to do this but what we managed to find in just seven plus days we found quite a bit and people who are willing in their own handwriting to write down their allegation, put their name down, sign their allegation with a notary there, sworn testimony under penalty of perjury and what is remarkable is the consistency which the affidavits read. a poll watchers being pushed out and michigan literally physically pushed. one young woman called the c word and another one of our poll watchers a man of chinese descent being yelled at and said why are you here, you are not an american and when he said i am an american he was preceded to be shouted down for five minutes and these people deserve to be heard and finally give a president doing just that. these democrat secretaries of state, i can't express enough, mark, what they have done. i recall when our campaign

lawyers came to the president month ago say look at what they are doing across the country and they are redesigning a system like secretary in pennsylvania saying you can receive ballots up to three days after election day and know they don't have to be postmarked. her telling the serene court i'm not going to count those ballots and i'm keeping them to the side and the supreme court saying we believe you and then she changes her guidance and it takes justice alito to rebuke her. they were consistently misrepresenting their opinion, changing deadlines, designing a system to prop up democrats and joe biden. mark: my question to you, kayleigh, is "the new york times" reporters, washington post reporters, nbc, abc, cbs are they contacting you about any of these constitutional violations for your input? are they asking you about any of these affidavits because they want to send reporters to the field and pursue them and see if there's a pattern with a postal worker in pennsylvania, example, being pressured to recant and says he hasn't recanted even though the washington post that

he did recant without even interviewing him. any inquiries or concerns about this fraud? >> no, not at all. in fact, several reporters have come to me and ask what are my general thoughts about the election and i will detail for them these affidavits and detail for them equal protection claims and they just stare blankly. they stare blankly. i remember look, i asked them with the hunter biden laptop where we had a laptop, evidence and joe biden not denying the authenticity of the laptop and i remember going back to the press corps insane why won't you cover this? again the same blank stare. it's immediately if you say the word hunter they shut down. if you say the word fraud, they shut down. there is a lack of journalistic curiosity in this country for anything that does not move the 72 voters who voted for him. it's egregious and irresponsible but luckily they are so blatant with their bias that the american people see right

through them. mark: when we come back i want to discuss with you the question now, first the media said there is no fraud. now the media saying there's not a lots of fraud. now the media says there's not enough fraud to overturn the election. i want to pursue this line of illogic and irrationality with you when we returned. we'll be right back. ♪ stem, your body needs routine. centrum helps your immune defenses every day, with vitamin c, d and zinc. season, after season. ace your immune support, with centrum. and now your co-pilot.. still a father. but now a friend. still an electric car. just more electrifying. still a night out. but everything fits in. still hard work. just a little easier.

still a legend. just more legendary. chevrolet. making life's journey, just better.

vicks vapopatch. easy to wear with soothing vicks vapors for her, for you, for the whole family. trusted soothing vapors, from vicks and look, it feels like i'm just wasting time. that's why td ameritrade designed a first-of-its-kind, personalized education center. oh. their award-winning content is tailored to fit your investing goals and interests. and it learns with you, so as you become smarter, so do its recommendations. so it's like my streaming service. well except now you're binge learning. see how you can become a smarter investor with a personalized education from td ameritrade. visit tdameritrade.com/learn ♪

visit tdameritrade.com/learn ♪ mark: welcome back america. the equal protection clause, kayleigh, is quite important and shows up twice in our constitution, 14th amendment and it is one of the civil war amendments and applies to all the people in this country and applies to voting. bush versus gore back in 2000 majority of the court recognized that there was unequal treatment of voters in the state of florida where we also have a rogue supreme court and we had alcor trying to litigate his way into the presidency. as opposed to donald trump who is trying to litigate and make sure that every legal vote counts and every illegal vote is dismissed. even more than that you have in pennsylvania a number of steps

taken that violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. i want your opinion on this and this is in the filing and in a filing that was filed last monday, plain as day, they have evidence of disparate treatment and i see this reported almost nowhere. equal protection clause is dropped and they don't expend the problems that apply equal protection clause. use your background as a harvard law school graduate and what are they talking about in pennsylvania about the violations of the equal protection clause? >> yes, very important. voting is of fundamental rights in this country and equal protection is an important component of protecting that right. there has to be uniform standards across the state and what we have found is we have evidence of this in pennsylvania, nothing of the sort and the disparate treatment you mentioned. here are the affidavits we have. in blue counties, seven blue counties, voters were being

contacted by democrat candidates and outside organizations saying your ballot has been canceled, come and fix it bird they were doing this despite the fact that the supreme court in the state says there is no way to fix ballots in advance and it's illegal to open ballots before election day but in the seven democrat counties they were able to fix their ballots. other 60 counties, republican counties, voters were not able to fix their ballot paid one woman's that i've been voting absentee for 15 years and went and turned in my ballot and did it by hand and she found out only after the election that her ballot was canceled. equal protection, it central to this but secondly, real quick with this mark, on an accounting of the ballots we have evidence of this as well that the legislator said you need a signature, postmark and address and they were counting ballots without a signature, postmarked or addressed. in these blue counties. this could amount to tens of thousands of ballots and people must be have equal amount of franchise in this country and in

pennsylvania there was nothing of the sort. mark: exactly. also, there was this problem for people who voted in person you have to show up by 8:00 p.m. eastern time or you don't get to vote. you can show up at 8:05 in eastern time and say look, i'm late because i was kidnapped and my mother was my brother was hit by a car and they will say too bad, it's 8:05 so you don't get to vote. no excuses, no nothing. on the other hand if you mail in a ballot we don't know when you voted because the supreme court remove the whole postage stamp and we don't even know if it is you who voted because not required to sign it and if you do sign it in the signatures don't match it doesn't matter, we will count it anyway. that is clear disparate treatment between people who show up in person and people who are using mail-in ballots. the supreme court of pennsylvania and its five-two, five leftist robed justices on the court, just like there were

rogue justices on the florida court and my question to you is with all this pressure in all this propaganda by obama and his ilk and all over the tv talking about president-elect biden and biden talking about the office of the president elect you want to talk about dictator, there it is. do you think that pressure will have an effect on the supreme court justice among others who are supposed to make these decisions based on the law and the constitution? >> i certainly hope not. when we look at the opinions that have been looking, justice alito and justice gorsuch had a wonderful concurrence where he said essentially what they've done is taking a pandemic and using that pandemic to change the rules and he said i understand it's challenging in the middle of a pandemic to vote but there are ways to do this we don't need to change voting laws rush at the last minute because it will disenfranchise people. he's exactly right. they took a global pandemic and

they made it into an electoral epidemic. they took what they said a natural disaster was their rationale and turn this into a national election disaster. i think where principled jurist and alito and judge gore said and amy coney barrett ultimately they will decide on the side of truth and justice and that these claims and it is thankful to president trump for putting in place principled jurors who want to make sure there is no fraud in our election and care about election integrity. mark: i would say this to the chief justice of the united states john roberts, your pants on pencil vania was incomprehensible. article two, section one, clause two of the constitution, as you know, specifically states the state legislator will determine who the electors are and that is the election laws. there is no issue of federalism in there. what is for the audience with justice roberts did is in one case where there was a state court or federal court that

interfered he said federal courts can't interfere with the state legislators and infants vania because of the supreme court he took a pass and give some silly, poetic recognition of federalism and that is a state court. that is not what article to the federal constitution says and it has nothing to do with federalism but it says the state legislator shall determine how the electors are pointed, not the governor, not some secretary of state, board of election, supreme court of the state, not the tooth very, nobody. the state legislator makes the decision, not even the supreme court of the united states. i would just say here justice roberts, it's in plain english but in fact, it's part of the clearest language and the constitution that is imaginable. if the chief justice and the united states won't uphold the constitution and if the chief justice of the united states will bow to the mob then we will not have lawful elections from this day forward and i would

warn the supreme court if the republicans lose the races in georgia they are coming for you. you justices want to be passive in the face of tyranny? all you have to do is uphold your part of the bargain and the constitution, the senate will destroy the united states supreme court. they made it abundantly clear. it is time for the chief justice of the united states to uphold the constitution of the united states. any final comments, kayleigh? >> yet, to echo that what is particularly egregious in the case of what justice roberts did with the supreme court there in pennsylvania and is he decided to take a democrat secretary of state who had tweeted anti- trump tweets which we did putting the word president in front of the word trump as an insult to the office took her at her word that she was going to segregate and not count ballots and in a mere matter of days she changed her guidance. you cannot take the secretary of state at their word and we must

fight this spirit we must make sure our elections have integrity for this election and for the election to come. mark: funny thing while she destroyed the electro solar system and by that disenfranchising voters, she referenced the civil rights act that is the voting rights act of 1965 and the suffragettes bid this is what the left do bread they use the constitution to destroy the constitution. kayleigh mcenany, thank you and i want to thank you for all you've done. god bless you and good luck. >> thank you, mark. youtube. mark: we'll be right back. ♪ when you're through with powering through, it's time for theraflu hot liquid medicine. powerful relief so you can restore and recover. theraflu hot beats cold.

>> live from america's news headquarters i'm jon scott. british prime minister boris johnson is entering self isolation today after possible exposure to someone who does a positive for the coronavirus. the prime ministers spent three days in an intensive care unit back in april after contracting the virus. the news comes as united kingdom is in the midst of its second national lockdown and as the coronavirus continues to search around the globe. history in cape canaveral, four astronauts have launched onboard a space x rocket to the international space station. the first fully operational flight tilt by a private rocket company. it will take 27 hours to reach the international space station where the astronauts will spend six months on board. a flawless launch by all

appearances. i'm jon scott and now back to "life, liberty and levin". ♪ mark: welcome back. i want to take a very close look at the media and what is going on before, during, after the election and now what is taking place and joe conscious is a fox news contributor and let me congratulate you on that, joe. your an absolutely outstanding commentator and the media columnist on the opinion side for the hill. i want to ask you about the media. first of all, these polls before the election. one or two groups had it right and a lot of the newsgroups saying we're just reporting them but i see newsgroups that sate the washington post slashed somebody else's poll and a lot of these, nbc slashed the poll so the media is in on this and

this is two election cycles and wrote with a democrat was supposed to win as if there were reagan versus carter or reagan versus mondale and some massive electoral landslide and they are off by double digits. how do you explain that? >> the numbers mark are astoundingly bad. in terms of the polling when you look at the numbers new york times had joe biden at a 70% chance of winning florida and had him up ten in ohio, nine in iowa and you mentioned abc news they do a poll with the washington post and they had trump down 17 points and wisconsin in their final poll. read cnn having joe biden up 12 nationally so every poll got this wrong and you would think from 2016 to your point that we would have learned our lessons in terms of polling and president trump in terms of the hidden trump votes. people not wanting to say they support the president because of

canceled culture and retribution perhaps, even with an anonymous poster bed isn't pulling antiquated at this point? we communicate in so many different ways mark and we go through our phone even with the obnoxious yellow cover and go through text messages and e-mail so who is answering a landline anymore? the problem is that our news organizations take a poll presented as breaking news, as actual facts instead of, look at it this way, when you have a stake, a poll can be news in terms of you can sprinkle it like salt on a steak but it's not the steak but it's a complementary part of the snack shop in time we have to stop reporting these things as absolute facts because you possibly suppress votes as a result when you have safer for president trump down 17 in the badger state. mark: it is not like they did not know they were having problems with these polls. a couple groups like trafalgar and a few others that kept saying they're not pulling right. they are not getting the people who are going to vote because

they are using, as you say, traditional means to contact them but people aren't all at the other end of those traditional communications. but they would not change course. do think that effects election? there was a wonderful piece by james baker in "the wall street journal" that said hey, this is so bad that both parties should object to it and that it can affect an election. >> i'm afraid, mark that in 2024 we will see the same process done all over and over again. here is the problem. many media outlets they just want to report the stuff because it's easy. you got a number, you throw it out there is a joe biden up by 14 nationally, shut off the lights and say good night. that is the thing. it's the easy thing to report but it doesn't tell you much and particularly when now no one trust polls at this point and i applaud frank the said maybe we should get into real estate at this point because this is devastating for our industry but we have short-term memory so when we have another presidential election that

starts in two years, believe it or not, we will see polls over and over again telling us how this person is leading this person and quite frankly, it don't mean nothing. mark: while they are pushing these don't mean nothing polls other things are going on in the country that the media utterly ignored or did not find. hundreds of lawsuits being brought in state after state after state by the democrat party and their surrogates to change the way we vote in estates. massive mail-in ballots voting in some states no signatures, no states no signature comparison or postmark and some on and on and that had more to change the landscape in this election and it was strategic, it was a network and a biting campaign was while we have reports on this that surrogates groups were involved and i saw almost no reporting on this from the major television networks but did you see a lot of reporting on this? >> i don't see anything great i

did see reporting in 2016 where i was told over and over again or not even 2016 but all the way up until 2019 and the conclusion of the mullah report that our election was hacked and then was interfered with by the russians and that the vote tallies were changed and then, speaking of polls, 62% of democrats actually believed that voting tallies were changed in 2016 and that hillary clinton had the election stolen from her and she said over and over again i get that she conceded right after the election but then she went on a four-year public therapy tour talking about how the president of the united states is illegitimate and then had this to say a couple weeks ago. quote, joe biden should not concede under any circumstances because i think this will drag out and eventually i do believe we will win if we don't give an inch and if we are focused and relentless as the other side is pretty also said we got to have a massive legal operation. wow. that sounds like she thought maybe biden could lose and as a result he should go down every legal avenue to make sure that

every legal vote is counted and every illegal vote is tossed out for that is hillary clinton telling joe biden that and president trump is literally conducting himself and his campaign and his legal team in that exact fashion and he is being told you need to concede now and this is bad for the country and an absolute joke and absolutely sad, mark. mark: when we come back, joe concha. i want to ask you who it is that is undermining democracy per barack obama? he has accused the president of the united states for going through these legal challenges and you do have a right to canvas and some of it is automatic and you do have a right to challenge the vote and we have recount but do have a right to go to court. is that undermining the democratic system like obama says or did obama and his administration undermine our democratic system with his rogue fbi, the rogue pfizer courts and the road intelligent agencies? we'll be right back. ♪

♪ ♪ smooth driving pays off with allstate, the safer you drive the more you save you never been in better hands allstate click or call for a quote today in connemara. right! connemara it is!

there's one gift the whole family can share this holiday season, their story. give the gift of discovery, with an ancestrydna kit.

♪ oh, oh, (announcer)®! ♪ once-weekly ozempic® is helping give the gift of discovery, many people with type 2 diabetes like emily lower their blood sugar. a majority of adults who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. here's your a1c. oh! my a1c is under 7! (announcer) and you may lose weight. adults who took ozempic® lost on average up to 12 pounds. i lost almost 12 pounds! oh! (announcer) for those also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. it lowers the risk. oh! and i only have to take it once a week. oh! ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) ozempic® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2,

or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. once-weekly ozempic® is helping me reach my blood sugar goal. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ you may pay as little as $25 for a 1-month or 3-month prescription. ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®.

♪ mark: joe concha, media analyst for the hill, fox news contributor and all-around good guy, very quickly, what undermines democracy more -- the obama administration and what they did before donald trump became president and while he was in the campaign, spies in his campaign, russia collusion, we know the whole story and i won't repeat it or the president of the united states today file following the legal processes that already exist in the states and following them to the end? what undermines democracy more? >> mark, i will chalk that up to a rhetorical question. [laughter] i can talk about how the media divides the country more than ever and based that on a gallup poll conducted last month that found and it was disturbing, 84% of americans believe that the

media bears the blame for divide in this country. if you think it's always been that way, no. 1976 gallup trusted media, three quarters of the country trusted the media then. can you believe that? it's been turned on the head and they don't even think media is informing us but it's dividing us. what i've seen during before and after the campaign are schism's being shifted. we've gone to journalism to activism. give you a couple examples with cnn town hall with joe biden, 60 questions from the audience. thirteen from democrats, three from republicans but you would think there would be a little more even if your goal is to inform voters. then we go to abc. they present this average everyday democratic voter who asked the question of joe biden, problem is, that average everyday them a credit voter was a speechwriter in the obama biden administration but you don't think abc could have vetted that or then again, was it a mistake or why do they go

the same direction every time? then nbc does a town hall also with joe biden and only supposed to be and this is how they advertise it, undecided voters but the problem was that there were plenty of biden undecided voters that actually already declared that they were voting for joe biden. i know this because they said it literally on msnbc air a couple of weeks before that. again, is us journalism or is this activism, mark? mark: you are right. you might chalk it up to eight rhetorical question but i thank you are right. joe, let me ask you this. obama is being interviewed on 60 minutes about his 800 page, 800 pages that's 700 pages too long. he is not asked a single question about the role of his administration and what knowledge he may have had in the january meeting before he left office and any knowledge whatsoever of the fbi and any knowledge whatsoever with the

hillary clinton campaign doing with the dossier, any knowledge of that and then we finally have an opportunity to ask this president questions about his administration, not what he thinks about what is going on, his administration what his administration did and not one question. isn't that what you are pointing out? activism versus efforts of objective journalism. >> and 60 minutes has been on more than years, most highly rated magazine news in the country, top ten show on television and here you have a former president of the united states any other pertinent questions that you can ask him besides the soft balls and they're not even softballs but it's like the way i played wiffleball with my five -year-old. are you ready, ready, here it is and that is the problem. it's a joke. we saw it with joe biden before this election as. five press conferences in 200 days. it's not like those press conferences consisted of any hostile questions like what the president gets, oh no, this was

much different. you had joe biden actually having stackers ask questions of reporters and joe biden cannot even do that himself. i don't use this word often but why is joe biden a coward when it comes to actually talking to the press if he is so confident in his arguments that he's been around 47 years he would just call on people randomly in the same fashion president trump says. say what you will about him but he took more tough questions during his four years than during any president that occupied the office for eight years and they were oftentimes hostile. we've heard about the # need to movement as a pretense to sexual harassment does that look at metoo movement that occurred do all of president trump press conferences in terms of journalists actually conducting soapbox journalism to get into a fight with the president because they weren't questions that were being asked but more like speeches advocating a side and then tossing it to the president in a fight or a verbal one, breaks out and then the reporter goes on the air afterwards and talks about how he or she was victimized and then they got a book out.

that's what we saw during the president trump's administration as far as a hostile press and now joe biden when he comes and he's only had one press conference since last tuesday and those questions were five questions, for about president trump. is that a softball or what when you ask someone about their opponent? mark: joe concha, we'll be right back. ♪ new advil dual action with acetaminophen fights pain in two ways. advil targets pain at the source... ...while acetaminophen blocks pain signals. the future of pain relief is here. new advil dual action. and it significantly helped me lower the amount of interest i was paying. sofi helped me pay off $23,000 of credit card debt. and i just couldn't have done it without them.

>> tech: every customer has their own safelite story. sofi helped me pay off $23,000 this couple was onebt. a camping trip... ...when their windshield got a chip. they drove to safelite for a same-day repair. and with their insurance, it was no cost to them. >> woman: really? >> tech: that's service you can trust. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪

♪ mark: welcome back. joe concha, joe biden did not talk a lot about policy but they did put 110 page manifesto out that is quite radical that very few people have read but i read it from front to back. it is basically bernie sanders agenda and so far the office of the president elect has announced policies, god forbid in my view should he become president, that are quite radical but he is surrounding himself with two types of people. lobbyists and radicals. am i right, am i wrong or who knows? >> who knows. what we have to look at now is january 5 in georgia and the firewall that could exist between a radical house or at least a radical side of the

democratic party taking over the house and then if you have through public and senate and a lot of that legislation can't get to a president biden if you have a republican senate as a firewall. all eyes on georgia but let me talk to you about activism by the way. thomas friedman, new york times columnist goes on the new york governor's brothers show on cnn and implores people to pick up your lives and move to georgia so you can vote in that election to impact that and make sure the democrats can have a 50/50 split in the senate and the means kamala harris is a tie-breaking vote. can you believe that? activism. gib jon meacham by the way and he's a presidential historian and supposed be bipartisan actually endorses joe biden but then it gets worse. he's writing speeches for joe biden but the problem is that he's also an msnbc contributor at the time and what he says is joe biden does a speech, meacham goes on afterwards and praises the speech and actually praises quotes in the speech that he

probably included without telling the audience that he was actually the speechwriter behind them. this is what i mean about activism in this particular race here but the bottom line is, mark, as far as policies are concerned what we haven't talked about and we didn't talk about during the campaign, how many questions did you see on trade? i think the u.s. mca was a pretty big deal. what about china outside of coronavirus, how will you deal with china mr. vice president? did not hear much about that at all is well begun policy apparently beto o'rourke will be in charge of that and we need to find out more about his second amendment position and what about foreign policy? is ice is not a thing, al-qaeda? nothing on that regard on or automation which is an important issue that nobody talks about and more and more ai, artificial intelligence, robots taking over low-wage jobs. i'd love to hear what president trump as a businessman or joe biden 47 years in politics would

do about that in terms of possibly retraining these workers or keeping these folks employed. none of those issues are explored but instead we got a boatload of climate change and social issues and did not get us anywhere as where these men stood to. mark: was his background, 47 years in washington, eight years as vice president. almost 40 years as a senator and his record was almost never discussed by the media and there was a lot to discuss. the comments he made about race earlier in his career is working with the segregationists and this was not just a legislative thing but the things he said about not wanting to send his kids into an integrated community, into a jungle, they protected him all along on these issues and was quite an abomination as chairman of the senate judiciary committee and the things he said and the things he said about very decent people in the character assassination again, he was never forced to answer for any

of that and never questioned about any of that and this is the dampness campaign i've ever seen in modern american history where a democrat candidate can hide out in the media will protect him and will not be questioned and now he's all over the place claiming he has an office of the president elect. he won't shut the hell up about all kinds of policies and attacks on donald trump. joe concha, i want to thank you, my friend. welcome to fox and god bless you. >> thank you, mark. i appreciate it. have a good night. mark: we'll be right back. ♪ up at 2:00am again? tonight, try pure zzzs all night. unlike other sleep aids, our extended release melatonin helps you sleep longer. and longer. zzzquil pure zzzs all night. fall asleep. stay asleep. to syour body needs routine. system, centrum helps your immune defenses every day, with vitamin c, d and zinc. season, after season.

ace your immune support, with centrum. you turn 40 and everything goes. tell me about it. you know, it's made me think, i'm closer to my retirement days than i am my college days. hm. i'm thinking... will i have enough? should i change something? well, you're asking the right questions. i just want to know, am i gonna be okay? i know people who specialize in "am i going to be okay." i like that. you may need glasses though. yeah. guidance to help you stay on track, no matter what comes next. ♪

that cannot be extinguished. it rages on to give us a glimmer of what we can do, and of who we can become. because hope fuels opportunity. university of phoenix is awarding up to one million dollars in new scholarships through this month. yes, hope is alive and well.

see what scholarship you qualify for at phoenix.edu.

to high quality computer science and stem education. ♪ i joined amazon because i wanted to change education and i am impatient. amazon gives me the resources to change the world at a pace that i want to change it. ♪ we provide students stem scholarships and teachers with support. ♪ i'm a fighter and i'm fighting for all students. ♪ mark: welcome back, america. we owe a great debt of gratitude to the men and women, lawyers, who left their jobs, left their families and traveled all over the country on their own time,

they are volunteering, to try to track down what took place in this election. these individuals are great patriots. the media has not gone into the communities to follow-up on any of the affidavits, any allegations taking place. it is appalling. instead they go to a local commissioner, asked the state board of elections did you see fraud and front page of "the new york times" this week that they asked state boards of election and there is the defendant in these cases. the media did not cover all the changes that the states were making, unconstitutionally that would improve biden's chances of winning and now the media is in a hurry to end this. the individual who is following the constitution and the rule of law in the court orders is the president of the united states. the individual who is not claiming to be the president elect and serves in the office

of the president elect who is undermining our constitutional system and is sounding very much like a dictator is joe biden. we have one president at a time, one president at a time, donald trump as president in the first term for the next two months. then we have people like obama and he is not the only one, republicans to making pronouncements that there is no fraud and these are men and women who have no idea what they are talking about. then they claim that this president is undermining the constitution when they sat still for four years as the media and the democrats were trying to destroy this presidency, attacking the people and undermining the integrity of our aquatic system. we will not accept lectures from them. we have no respect for them. there are 72 million of us and maybe even more now, and now, in my view, we should treat them the way they treated us. they want unity?

i tell you unity, unity behind this. the declaration of independence and the constitution of the united states. that is what we unite behind. i will see you next time on "life, liberty and levin". ♪ >> welcome to the next revolution on steve hilton and this is the home of positive populism, pro- worker, profamily, pro- committee and above all, pro- america. in a moment will be joined lied by senator marsha blackburn with her thoughts on the election and its aftermath and also with us tonight pete hegseth, lisa boothe and robin smith. let's get started 70% and it's become a well-known number, 70% of republicans who do not believe the election was free or fair. neither do a third of independence but surprise, 96% of democrats do think it was fair unlike last time.