have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. ♪ [ music playing ] >> tucker: good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. did you take a moment from your bu busy life to turn on the hearin hearings? don't be embarrassed if you didn't. obviously you should be gravely concerned, you may have decided to skip today's spectacle or fold the laundry and we don't judge you for that. elderly senators who can't manage to send their own text messages waggling their fingers in the face of san francisco

oligarchs, all of whom seem to understand they will get to continue doing whatever they want to do because they have all the money. it seems insulting to the rest of us. in the end today's hearings may seem just as pointless. for one brief moment today you got the feeling that maybe actual progress was being made. maybe the good guys might not be entirely lame. that moment came when senator josh hawley asked mark zuckerberg about an internal tool his company has developed calmed sent extra. hawley knew about centra because a whistle blower told him about it. facebook used it to spy on users. centra gives facebook access to troves of data on users. you didn't know about this because all of it happened in secret. it's probably not even legal. today at the hearings josh hawley confronted mark

zuckerberg about them. here is how it went. >> sentra is a tool that facebook uses to track its users on facebook and across the entire internet. sentra tracks certain profiles, message recipients, linked accounts, pages they sift around the web. how many at have been subject to review and shut down by centra? senator i do not know. i'm not actually familiar with the name of that tool. i'm sure we have another that help us with pour platform and community integrity work. but i am not familiar with that name. >> do you have a tool that does exactly what i described and that you can see here over my shoulder or are you saying that doesn't exist? senator i'm saying i'm not familiar with it. >> tucker: i'm not familiar with it senator. hold on a second mark zuckerberg. you run the company. you started it. and centra sounds like a pretty

big deal. are you saying centra doesn't exist? well no, it turns out that's not what they're saying. hours ago a facebook spokesperson admitted to fox news that sentra is indeed real. according to that spokesperson sentra is used to central lies and aid investigation into coordinated integrated in authentic behavior. you may never have heard of it. it's known as astro surfing. the left claims to be very concerned about it. sentra is another long-term consequence of the russia hoax. adam schiff gets hysterical about vladimir putin and facebook gets to spy on if you without your knowledge and sell the data they gather. perfect. mark zuckerberg who runs the company said he had no idea it was going on. centra wasn't the only secret internal data gathering tool

zuckerberg claimed to be ignorant of. senator hawley asked him about traffic. according to senator hawley's whistleblowers. they enter the companies suggestion for censorship onto the task platform so facebook can follow-up on them and coordinate their censorship platforms. they're all in it together. the tech companies amount to a censorship cartel. mark zuckerberg did not deny this. instead he conceded it would be probably pretty normal it for people to talk to their peers in the industry. it is all real. silicon valley acts as one. they work together to sense sore their political opponent. you may be one of them. you aren't -- chris coons isn't worried he was thrilled to hear

it. he wants more. coons is a senator from delaware. former joe biden staffer. chris coons is described as moderate because of how he speaks. chris coons is boring therefore he must be reasonable. that's the thinking. but chris coons is not reasonable. he is a power hungry lunatic who doesn't believe in the first amendment. chris coons went to yale law school. notice how they never acknowledge the bill of rights. we should find out about that law school class. he presses mark zuckerberg for more censorship. you do mr. dorsey have policies against deep fakes or manipulated media against covid-19 misinformation, against things that violate civic integrity but not a misinformation policy, why not, helping to disseminate climb gnat denial liz many.

it extends one of the greatest existential threats to our world. chris coons points was simple. people who disagree with chris coons are a threat to our world. they must be silent. who are the people chris coons doesn't believe should be allowed to speak in public? legitimate scientists who might have questions. chris coons is a lawyer who spent the last 20 years in government. everything he knows about climate he learned from an issue of atlantic magazine he picked up in the airport. he is a non-expert. you should the standard he demanded today in congress the social media experts sensor anyone who questions his shallow silly views on one of the most complex views of known science. that is not a moderate stance that is censorship.

it doesn't simply kill expression though it does. censorship kills thinking and innovation and wisdom. censorship leads to self censorship. people learn who they're allowed to think and believe. they stop asking questions even of themselves. their minds become narrower. science which depends on free inquiry becomes impossible. does that sound familiar to you? it's where we are right now. but that's not a problem for people like chris coons, his main concern is how to control an inquisitive population. he would be delighted with a nation that can't think for themselves. shut up and obey or we will make you be quiet. that's the message they're sending collectively. a lot of us expected something different to happen. the election is over. the billionaire party got what it wanted. why can't they take the boot off

our neck? no chance. they're just getting started. in the past two weeks corporate america has rushed to consolidate it's control over dissent in this country. the email delivery service mail chimp said it is refusing to give e-mail to the tea party. friends felt tea party attempted to notify its members about a rally about voter fraud. they're not allowed to use email. pay pal and air bnb have done the same thing, take ten down accounts belonging to conservatives. if you want to live a normal life here, send an email, transfer money, rent an apartment, you had better be on the right side. how is that different from what happens in china? call us and let us know if you can spot the difference. we can't.

abiga abigail amazon cut off advertisements for her book. it's a real thing, she wanted to know why it was happening. she tried to explain it. that's not allowed. target banned her book completely for a time. a lawyer at the aclu cheered that decision. said the book should be burned. meanwhile in a story very few saw a major video game company erased retroactively someone from the picture as the soviets once did. what was her crime? she wrote a forum post that people thought was transphobic. ubisoft thought she should never work again, anywhere. her voice was too offensive. gin that is in the tv series,

when she criticized mask mandates and preferred pronounce they decided she needed to be fired. where is this coming from? almost nobody likes it. almost no americaner supports it. corporations are behind it. all of it. the point is not to help anyone, much less you. let's be clear about that. >> the point is to establish control. they know they can dictate what you have the right to say about transrights or mask mandates. they can dictate what you can say about anything. that's unprecedented power. no one in this country has ever had that power. our constitution used to prevent it but they have it now. that power will come until handy when they're running the government which they may soon be. take a look at the people joe biden wants to install in the white house in january. a former pharmaceutical to be his chief counselor. ron claim to be his chief of

staff. did he want chief of staff will be a woman who co. founded a consu consulting company who represented big pharma. biden also is bricking on louisiana law maker cedric richmond a reliable ally of the fossil fuel industry which is quite political and not conservative, richmond has received more money from the oil and gas industry than virtually anyone in congress. corporations are getting more control. once they run everything they will control what you say. where does that leave the politicians and the career bureau kratz. free to play the roll of petty tie rant fulfilling that i remember personal desires to impose the will on the rest of us. michigan learned gofr more whit her relishes telling her constituents whether they can hold thanksgiving dinner, if they do on sunday they're

essentially killing people if you are considering spending thanksgiving with people outside of your household, i urge you to reconsider. and i hate to say it. but we know that some people will gather any way. and odds are that some of these gatherings will spread covid and contribute to the loss of loved ones. >> i hate to say it. there is the falsest phrase ever uttered by an american politician. she have doesn't hate to say it. she's been saying it all year n april governor whit her banned the sale of paint and furniture. what scientist told her to do that? none. she did it because she could. now she's banning thanksgiving. what the next? this is more than a slippery slope we're watch trisha garcia happen in realtime. the governor of california gavin newsom emphasized you need to stay isolated. he doesn't. he went to a private birthday party with a bunch of people in

napa. he wasn't breaking the rules he was giving you ever an example of what not to do. good afternoon the vin newsom was risking his life for you. he's a covid matter. why doesn't the anyone appreciate him. the essence of science, really is that you spend the holidays alone i'll remind you three-pronged approach prevaccine was around prevention, testing and isolation. isolation, prevention, 2e69ing, what is the purpose of testing besides obviously identifying people that are positive and building a framework and protocol to protect their health, also protect others through isolation and quarantine? >> tucker: there's a lot coming at us right now. take three steps back, are pause, what are we really watching? we're watching something pretty dark honestly. this isn't the politics we've

come to understand in this country. this isn't the usual debate about tax rates or tariff policy. we miss those debates. will this remain a free country? can you disagree with corporate america and still live here? will you be allowed to fly on an airplane, stay in a motel, use email? will tiny brains like chris coons determine what science is and what you can say about it or not? that is what is on the table. we understand we had an election, it's in dispute, there's a lot of news going on at this moment. nothing matters more than this. senator josh hawley is in the middle of it. he joins us. thanks a lot for coming on. it's an amazing moment at that hearing i thought. explain to us, if you would, is it legal for tech companies to coordinate to sense sore the political views of americans? i don't know that it is,

tucker. in fact i think very old antitrust law called the sherman act prevents these robber baron companies and that's what they are by the way. these are the most powerful corporations in history, and here they are coordinating about how they're going to stop us from speaking, who they're going to ban, what phrases will be allowed to trend and whatnot. we basically caught them red handed. mark zuckerberg admitted to me under oath yeah actually facebook censorship teams do talk to google and twitter. and he added we make our own decisions but he admitted yeah actually they are in coordination. the whistle blower admitted to me they coordinate very, very closely. it warrants further action by congress. congress is going to have to get off its back side and do something here or these corporations are going to run america. >> tucker: antitrust seems like

the one thing they fear, not 230, a lot of the solutions we thought would work to make this a free country don't seem to intimidate them. do you think there's any chance of forward motion on that? well i think that the justice department's antitrust suit against google that will they brought a few weeks ago was absolutely vital and i think congress is going to need to act to update the antitrust laws. they haven't been used as they were meant to be used in decades. these companies are the most power feel companies we've seen in american history. they're the most powerful companies in the world. it's time we took them on. our constitution is quite clear, we the people are supposed to run this government and this nation, not the big corporations. and unless we do something, they're going to >> tucker: i never thought i would hear a conservative here what you just said you're conservative and right. it's time for us to update our

thoughts on what it is to be conservative. thank you very much thank you >> tucker: the tech companies are including, social media companies, the founder of parler john massey, the cite has exploded. congratulations in the massive surge in popularity of your company. why is parler which is still much smaller than twitter, why are people going there? what is it you offer that they don't? thank you for having me on tucker. what we're seeing is a massive explosion and growth because people trust that parler is going to do the right thing. as opposed to these other companies where mad declaration seems to be the norm on parler we have a community jury. the people decide what is allowed and not allowed. you're judged by your peers just like our government allows for people. you're the innocent before

proven guilty, unlike these other platforms that are including to spy on things to find you guilty for. we want to sit back and say social media was supposed to be about the people. it was supposed to be about people having a free voice, being able to be listen operated from restrictions. that's what we're here to offer. a community town square for people to have discussions >> tucker: i'm shocked by the media response to what you're doing. every mentally extreme mist in the world has a twitter account. you never hear about it on cnn. you offer an alternative and you're the extremist. why is corporate media on frayed of what you're doing? i always ask them what do you think of the first amendment? do you believe we should have somebody in new york in the middle of time square telling you what you can and cannot say? that's what these companies are doing. i don't know why they're so afraid. maybe they don't like people getting power again.

you mentioned parler was a little bit smaller than twitter. we do have people that have comparable if not larger following on parler than twitter and they're seeing far had more engagement. you get what you signed up for and that's it. you get what you expect. and so that's why we're seeing such great engagement because it's not being cure rated like publishers would do on these other platforms >> tucker: it's getting huge. that's undeniable. i wonder if you will keep your posture as your company gets big and much more valuable, it's already happen. people will attack you, some crazy person said something crazy on your cite. there's going to be a whole lot more of that and you will come under enormous pressure to sense sore those voices when you go out in public people say crazy things all the time. everybody has opinions. some of them might not be the norm. right? but it's not against the law to have those opinions.

it's not against the law to express yourself, you know? if you like one political candidate or another or you believe over don't believe in climate change you shouldn't be taken off line because of it >> tucker: exactly. thank you. you just re-stated the traditional american understanding of free speech. which the left defended and didn't mean it. it's left to you to protect that noble defense. thank you john massey thank you. >> tucker: you're hearing politicians all over the country telling you not to celebrate thanksgiving. they have no basis in science and contra to the cobs stewings. some brave public officials have decided they're not going along with this. we want to highlight their stories and we're going to after the break.

your blood pressure numbers could change your life. talk with your doctor about creating a plan that works better for you. start taking the right steps at manageyourbp.org

frank: now i'm trying to get better. stronger than ever! the break.

>> tucker: politicians have now decided they have total power over you. they can now decide who comes to thanksgiving dinner at your house and where they can stand. it's never happened in american history before, no matter what cnn claims, hasn't. what happened if you don't owe bay? in new york one county sheriff has an answer to that. nothing.

nothing will happen. that sheriff has decided not to enforce andrew cuomo's lunatic ban on public gathering. he did explained why today one of the worst things we're seeing of isolation of people not being able to engage with other people. there's a big difference between setting a time limit at bars, and restaurants, and social distancing and getting together with your own family p constitutionally there's some problems with an executive order. there's no sanctions, i can't go arrest somebody. they don't get fined. giving them the benefit of the doubt can really, i believe his intent is to try to slow things t i think it does more damage >> tucker: exactly. people need each other. physical contact is essential. families need to gather. thanksgiving is beautiful. that sheriff is richard giordino and bless him for saying the obvious. he's not the only public

official stabbing up to this. in oregon a woman who will start on the board of clackamas in january. my family will celebrate thanksgiving dinner with as many family and friends as i can find. this is an elect official and she joins us now on the show. tuttie smith thank you for coming on. it's funny that that statement will qualify as bravely, it certainly does. congratulations. why did you write that the? because it's exactly what i felt. it's very heartfelt. she issued that edict on friday p i posted it saturday morning. thinking about it. this is a travesty that's happening in our state. how dare governor brown think she's going to come out, send the police into people's homes and arrest them and fine them for having a thanksgiving meal with their family? while at the same time she allows riot terse and an arc i

was to destroy down town city apartments, that's hypocrisy. we have been in a lock down -- go ahead tucker >> tucker: people like governor brown would be the first ones to say politicians keep their hands off my body and here she is encouraging the police to come into your home on one of the most sacred days of the year and determine who is eating there. does she see the irony there? i don't think so at all. i think she's into total control and dom anything over our population. she's issued this eed depict state wise to all 36 countries regardless of the infection rate, regardless of the testing rate. not even governor newsom has done that. he's allowed each county autonomy to make that i remember tone decisions. our governor has not. she doesn't trust the elected officials in each of our counties in oregon. we've been in a lock down for

eight months. people understand what to do to be healthy. we have been browbeat over the head with wearing masks in public, which i do by the way, with social distancing. stay home if you're sick. be clean. i think our people have the intelligence, education and independence to make their own decisions. we are adults. we do not need to be treated as second rate slaves in our own homes. >> tucker: good for you! our viewers if they don't know oregon may be confused. the oregon we see is portland. oregon is a lot like maine it's a great state with reasonable people dominated by children in a place called portland. how has been your response snrjts the public response i'm getting a lot of good comments, i'm getting people saying, yeah! i also have the trolls and the minions who are trying to

discredit me and take me down. but you know i am not going to be deterred by this, i know i'm on the right side on this. people want their freedoms, independence to make their own decisions. we can do that in oregon. we are responsible people who can set our own destiny. our governor needs to allow us to do that >> tucker: exactly. when they try to say you can't be with your family on thanksgiving, that's the line we can't let them cross that's really true tucker, the isolation is killing us, the fall out from 34e7b tal health and comes in the form of child abuse, suicide rate is increasing and domestic violence. that really needs to be addressed. she has no solutions to that. her main edict is to shuttle down and keep people separate. we as human beings have that right to be together >> tucker: exactly. look around. how many people do you know who are fragile and neurotic and

unhappy and unwell psychologically as a result of this nonsense? thank you for fighting back. great to see you thank you tucker, bye-bye >> tucker: the president announced he's pulling thousands of troops out of the afghanistan and iraq. that made some people like mitt romney very unhappy. we don't need 20 more years in afghanistan. to what end? what is the purpose exactly? why is 20 years premature to pull out? we'll find out next.

>> tucker: so the president has been saying for years he wants to withdraw all american troops from afghanistan and he means it sincerely. it's been tough to get it the done. today the pentagon announced we're going to cut the number of troops in afghanistan from 4500 to 2500 and reduce the number of troops in iraq from 3000 to 2500.

most people strongly support this. however many republicans on capitol hill are upset we're finally close to ending the war in afghanistan after 19 years a rapid withdrawal of u.s. forces from afghanistan now would hurt our allies and delight, delight the people who wish us harm. >> tucker: a rapid withdrawal! after more than 19 years! that's rapid. according to people in washington who measure time in glacial terms a apparently we should stay in afghanistan forever. mitt romney complained that troop reduction may not be quote a wise decision for national security reasons. he didn't explain what that means but never washington agrees with it. democrats and republicans are agreed on one point. permanent presence in countries that hate us and give us no obvious benefit is nevertheless vital to our national security.

on cnn they had an on air panic attack at the possibility of american troops finally leaving afghanistan who does this? who drops something like this in the lap of an incoming president? no one other than donald trump. i think what he's trying to go do is go through his bucket list, quite honestly >> tucker: who does this says the 32 year old news anchor? gil barndollar has thought about it. he's one of the defense non-profits you can trust. he joins us. thank you for coming on gil thank you tucker. >> tucker: why the outrage and how did 19 years get to be too speedy for people in washington yeah, i think folks from learned nothing. the kind of people that are largely responsible for these mistakes and disasters, call them what they are, overseas haven't learned a things. these are the longest wars in american history. you've got guys literally were toddlers or newborns on the 9/11 who could be walking their

father's patrol roots in afghanistan. it would be darkly funny if it weren't for the fact we have americans killing and dying over there trying to accomplish mission impossible >> tucker: it's interesting, whatever you think of president trump, he's the first president in 40 years not to initiate a major conflict. no one seems happy about that. >> everyone in washington seems glum at that yd. why? you have people addicted to an idea of american strength that i think comes close to the old definition of insanity. banging your head against the wall. yeah we've accomplished -- we haven't accomplished victory by the aims we set out in these countries. iraq was a disaster for the united states, for the region and the whole world n afghanistan we tossed the tal taliban out of power and should have come home within a year or so, or we failed to build a country, we should have come

home a long time ago and should have figured that out close to two decades also. >> tucker: current leadership at the pentagon support these kind of conflicts but the guys who served there and took the physical risk in serving them, you must know a burn of them. what is their view? you can look at the surveys, last time i checked between 58 and 65% of u.s. veterans, i think pu last year found this higher than the american civilian population thought the wars in afghanistan and iraq were a mistake. i think most veterans however much they've invested in it, majority of u.s. veterans have gotten rid of cost and realize it's well past time to come home >> tucker: the people who actually served think that was a mistake and we should pull back. why does no one say that? why are proponents of endless wars which is a very left wing

liberal idea why do they get the moral high ground on this and anyone that disagrees is for a weaker america? there are a couple answers, you saw it in the eye rack war. it's a lot easier when it's not your sons and daughters in a volunteer military or recruited military if we're being honest. it's easy to shame somebody else, there's not a lot of cost and not a lot of people have skin in the game. that's a big piece to it. we have broader apathy in this country toward for en policy >> tucker: that is so true. a bunch of people that claim to be journalists ran into joe biden yesterday. that doesn't happen very often. senator john kennedy w56atched . we're going to watch the same and found out how it went. that's next. tape

and found out how it went. that's next.

[ music playing ] >> tucker: you're hearing a lot recently about president joe biden. you should be wondering okay what would this president do when he gets to the white house. to answer the question of course you would want the press conference. reporters ask the politician

questions that hulled like answered. if you watched joe biden's press conference yesterday you would have been pretty disappointed. did on the other hand if you want to know how truly joe biden is and how appalling his political opponents are, you're in luck i understand now i'm going to take some questions. meghan, fire away what do you see as the biggest let to your -- given president trump's unpremise dented attempt to disrupt and delay a smooth transfer of power. you spoke of the president's stonewalling of this transition. it doesn't appear the president is going to come around any time soon and admit defeat. what are you going to do? what is your message to republicans who are backing up the president of the united states refusal to concede. i want to get your thoughts on the president he's tweets over the weekend. do you want him to concede? >> tucker: president biden how bad is president trump? it went on like this. senator john kennedy watched. he's of course representing the state of louisiana, he's a

republican. he joins us tonight. thanks a lot for coming o you noticed slobber on joe biden's suit was that slobber from the press corps do you think? tucker, i didn't watch the questioning of mr. biden. i've watched the whole campaign, and look it you would have to be a special kind of stupid not to see the disparate treatment between mr. biden and mr. trump. sins he was selected by the manager on lead in the democratic party i think the toughest question that mr. biden has been asked is does he support children in prosperity? and probably the second toughest question is does he like opinion it's? and this is very dangerous for our decembmocracy >> tucker: yeah here is a news flash. politicians lie. not always, but sometimes. they hide the truth t why? because it helps them hold on to power.

and the role of a journalist toss hold those politicians accountable and to ferret out and safeguard the truth. and in doing so journalists can't pick sides. otherwise they're not seeking out the truth. they've got to be equal opportunity a holes, if you will. and too many of our journalists have started picking sides. and it will ultimately undermine their profession. and democracy. because without truth there is no trust. without trust there is for democracy >> tucker: amen. you've been in politicians for awhile. you're a united states senator. however held a press conference in which the questions consisted of how horrible is your opponent? no, i've never seen it like this. i came into politics, not at the federal level but the state will testify 25 years ago. and it used to be that journal lichts really were equal

opportunity -- probably shouldn't use what i said before -- i'll say jerks. they were tough. they were tough. didn't matter what your party affiliation was. their job was to ferret out the truth. but you know there's an old adage that says keep the company of those who seek the truth. run from those who already know it. i think many members of the press think they already know the truth. >> tucker: there's something about watching reporters suck up to people in power that's really, really chilling. far wours than attack trisha garcia people with power, that's fine. sucking up to people with power is terrible. thank you for coming on thank you tucker >> tucker: the election is over but the crack down is just beginning. now the left is going after attorneys who represent anyone whose affiliated with the trump campaign. if they don't like your politics

you're not entitled to legal counsel. do you want to live in that country? we've got the details after the break.

>> tucker: well, last week, a group called the lincoln project, which is run mostly by consultants who ran campaigns against donald trump in the 2016 primaries, launched a half a million dollar advertising blitz. the point of it wasn't to promote a candidate. the goal was simple: terrorizing the commercial clients of any law form that dared to represent the president's campaign. they always know my post of the office numbers and email address of lawyers at a very big firm based in washington and r representing the republican party of pennsylvania. they probably promise not to get involved in any more litigation in the election because they were intimidated -- you would become too. another law firm has withdrawn representing the trump campaign because of the pressure launched on them. do you want to live in a country where, if you have the wrong

political beliefs, you don't get competent legal representation? asked the question before us. harmeet dhillon is probably the most prominent first amendment attorney in the united states and we are always happy to havef her on the shown. harmeet, thanks for coming on. u what does this mean for the rest of us? i've never seen anything like this before and i'm worried about what it portends for the future. >> well, this is economic terrorism, and it's very scary to the ordinary person. some of these law firms, like george conway come affiliated with this lincoln project committee has been one of the pe condemnations of firms, i went to his website to see who his firm represents, and they mentis of criminal, no fewer than ten times on their website. people who do false claims, tax evasion, price-fixing, you know, securities fraud, other types of white-collar crimes.en they are happy to represent

actual alleged criminals, but you cannot have the counsel of your choice. this is really scary because let's face it, our system of justice does not work unless there are good lawyers on bothh sides. anybody has clerked for a judge can tell you that. when you have the most powerful person in the country come his lawyers are bullied out of dropping him come and they are making legitimate claims concerning the constitutionality of excepting ballots after the day of the election, the legitimacy of treating some voters in some counties different than others, these are legitimate and good arguments, but every lawyer associated with the trump campaign, even in a spokesperson capacity like i have been, gets death threats, gets incredible abuse from partners that major law firms. i've had abuse on my facebook page for managing partners of law firms in san francisco accusing me of heinous crimes. they represent actual criminals. so, what this means, if the president's lawyers can be bullied into dropping him and throwing him under the bus --

which is what happened with a couple of these law firms -- it can happen to you. it canan happen to you or your family. if you are accused of a crime, if you are representing unpopular cause, someone makes a false accusation against you, someone attacks your job, livelihood, there is a mob waiting to intimidate lawyers who want to take your case. that means we don't have two sides. the americantw bar association s guidelines on this, and the guidelines say that lawyers are entitled to represent any kind of client, and it does not mean they are taking on the cause their client represents, and it is important for the courts of justice for there to be two sides. nicely lawyers like george conway and like partners and other major law firms -- and by the way, it is lawyers leading this charge. there are these sleazy consultants also raising money, but it is lawyers who are leading this charge, and they should be ashamed. they are leaving nasty voice mails. some lawyers have 24-hour security now.

have death threats, their offices have been shut down from its disgusting. >> tucker: well, it is. the lawyers who represented o.j. simpson and a double murder trial called the dream team. thank you for putting that in perspective. did mike harmeet dhillon, defending the first amendment, thank you. thanks for watching, thanks for trusting us. we will see you tomorrow at 8:00 p.m. eastern. here is sean. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." we begin with a fox news alert. tonight, all eyes are on georgia, pennsylvania, michigan, nevada, breaking moments ago, the state of georgia's hand recount magically -- how many days after election day, uncovered yet another 2700 uncounted ballots. the majority of which, oh, shockingly, casper president trump. last night, same story, another 2600 uncounted ballots were discovered, and again, most of those in favor of the president. with the hell is happening in georgia and in our