or one or two might make the difference. we'll hear i'm sure more about that coming up. >> we'll keep watching for that. that does it for us here from "america's newsroom." "outnumbered" starts now. >> harris: breaking news this hour. we are awaiting a news conference to start. >> harris: the president has tweeted they will discuss a very clear and viable path to victory. this as some of the top house republicans on the hill are now calling for hearings in their chamber on the integrity of the 2020 election. house judiciary committee ranking member jim jordan says the irregularities and improprietys must be examined. >> why don't democrats want to get to the bottom of all the

irregularities, all the problems in the 2020 election? the committees aren't meeting this week. why not? why not look into this. the fundamental question. the same democrats who told us that the rioters and looters are peaceful protesters are the same ones who are telling us we can trust the vote. >> harris: meanwhile in a stunning move two republicans on the wayne county board of canvassers have rescinded their votes. saying that democrats bullied them and threatened their families. the in wisconsin, the trump campaign has filed a petition for a recount in two counties claiming there were illegally altered absentee ballots and voter identification laws were

broken. you're watching "outnumbered." i'm harris faulkner. with kennedy. host of "kennedy." marie harf. in the center virtual count steve hilton is here, host of "the next revolution" can you can catch sunday evening at 9:00 eastern. good to see you, everybody. steve, the news conference coming up and we have heard once before from rudy giuliani. what's your take on where we are with the lawsuits and how the trump campaign is handling it. >> steve: we'll see the details in a moment but the big picture for me is that cent% of republicans according to a survey recently do not believe that the election was free or fair. and my question is who are the 30% who do?

because for so many reasons i would agree with that proposition. three reasons if being it. first of all, the fact that we had massive late changes made to the voting systems to make it something that most americans would now agree is completely broken and dysfunctional. these changes were pushed by the democrats not because of the virus as they claim. back in 2019, as soon as the democrats took control of the house nancy pelosi, the first bill that they published had all of those changes that she now says were necessary because of the virus. mass mail-in voting. reducing the security requirements. all of that. that was all in the first bill. the democrats have been wanting to make these changes for years. they took their chance with the virus. they pushed it all through. as a result, what have you got? mass mail-in voting combined with voter rolls that are completely plagued with errors according to the pew foundation and combine that with ballot harvesting i a practice i cannot

believe we still have in this country. it is all so dysfunctional. two more things. the fact that in the election you had almost the entire media ranged against president trump. that is not a fair election. on top of that, the third point. silicon valley and big tech suppressing information that could hurt their candidate. put all that together and whatever the outcome of this legal process, we'll see that shortly, it's right to conclude that this election was not a fair election and that's why so many americans are angry today. >> harris: kennedy, i come to you next for your top line thoughts as we,a wait this news conference with the trump campaign attorneys. >> i don't think that steve is wrong about most of that. and he's really, really good at doing his research. what i will say is the president probably shouldn't have demonized mail-in voting as much as he did because i think he could have gotten more republican votes through mail-in

voting and the problem was and one of the aspects of voter suppression that people have talked about within the polls particularly and i keep going back to this, and some people dismiss this as an outlier, the "the washington post"/abc nides poll that had biden up 17 points in wisconsin, if you had a majority of republican voters going out to vote in person and they see something like that a couple of days they're supposed to vote they're going to say what's the point? he's going to lose. why am i going to wait in the enclement weather. i think that was a mistake on the part of the trump campaign. as far as the president's unforced errors which we talk about many times on this show, he could have done a better job at personal comportment and that could have made the difference in places like georgia and wisconsin. >> harris: molly, i'm curious. was it broken reasoning to make changes right before an election or talent? -- or thereabouts for covid?

when you look at the situation now, i'm sure if the election were held now, wouldn't they be changing rules trying it keep people in their houses with the mail-in? i'm curious to know what you think. >> marie: i think covid waslet excuse given this year for rampant changes to how we vote. we have known for a very long time that mail-in balloting is ripe for fraud. why france banned it. why gerry nadler said it was ripe for fraud. you had elections where 20% of mail-in ballots were thrown out for failing to pass scrutiny, why people were indicted in new jersey for mail-in ballot fraud corruption and it is obvious to everyone. everybody knows that mail-in balloting is less secure than in-person balloting. we didn't just move to rampant mail-in balloting, we also decreased the scrutiny we

applied to mail-in ballots, achieved by lawsuits from democrats and it's completely reasonable that people would look at these changes and say this not something i have confidence in. what's important right now is not just that you have integrity with this election but that moving forward never again do we have a situation where we have rampant mail-in balloting and no scrutiny. no signature checks. no witness requirements. kicking people out when it matters. it can't be rushed. i think people need to slow down. calm down. if they care about people having confidence in this election. >> harris: that's really good advice for all of us. you've got to take a deep breath. the reason i'm curious about the point is you look at the 26 lawsuits that have been brought by the trump campaign and 25 of them have not been successful and many of them have challenged some of the notions that you are bringing up, mollie, i wonder

why they're not. you have to be patient and ask good questions. while you were talking, news was made there. you see that multiple pathways to victory? one of the people in the room came up and took down the cover on that and these are the multiple pathways to victory perhaps that the president was tweeting about with less than specificity a few hours ago ahead of the news conference with mayor giuliani, with all of the lawsuits pressed now by the trump campaign in 2020 and jenna ellis who is a senior legal advisor, as they step to the lectern we can see more about what they're thinking in terms of legality. your reaction to what we see on the screen. breaking news. >> marie: the reason almost none

of those lawsuits in the trump campaign have been successful is there is no evidence to back up their claim. there are a lot of a-- assertions by trump supporters. there is no evidence that there was widespread problem with mail-in votes. people can say i have a feeling there was but we need evidence in this country and in our legal system you city republican appointed and democrat appointed judges throwing out lawsuits and at the end of the day there are no pathways for donald trump, joe biden is going to be the next president and there is something different saying you need to make sure mail-in balloting is secure and the president saying he won, it was a rigged election. this was a free and fair election. for all of us stoking fears that donald trump had this taken from him unfairly -- >> harris: marie harf, i have to step in. the president's legal team is

here and going live and that is rudy giuliani. let's watch. >> representatives of our legal team. representing president trump and we're representing the trump campaign. when i finish, sidney powell. and then jenna ellis will follow me. and we will present in brief the evidence that we have collected over the last -- i guess it is two weeks. also, joseph digenova and victoria toensing are with me. there are a lot more lawyers working on this but i guess we're the senior lawyers, and boris epstein. the best way to describe this is when we began our representation of the president, we certainly were confronted with a very anomalous set of results. the president way ahead on election night. 700 or 800,000 in pennsylvania.

somehow he lost pennsylvania. we have statisticians willing to testify that that's almost statistically impossible to have happened in the period of time that had happened but of course that's just speculation. as we started our investigation, brave american citizens who have come forward. extraordinary number of people. extraordinary number of witnesses. what emerged very quickly is this is not a singular voter fraud in one state. this pattern repeats itself in a number of states. almost exactly the same pattern. which to any experienced investigator, prosecutor, would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized place to execute these various acts of voter fraud to specifically focus on big cities, and

specifically focus on -- as you would imagine, big cities controlled by democrats, and particularly focused on big cities that have a long history of corruption. the number of voter fraud cases in philadelphia could fill a library. just a few weeks ago, there was a conviction for voter fraud and one two weeks before that, and i have often said i guess sarcastically but it's true. the only surprise i would have found in this is if philadelphia hadn't cheated in this election because for the last 60 years they've cheated in just about every single election. you could say the same thing about detroit. each one of these cities are cities that are controlled by democrats which means they can get away with anything they want to do. it means they have a certain degree of control over -- certainly control of the election board completely and they control law enforcement and

unfortunately they have some friendly judges that will issue ridiculously irrational opinions just to am can out in their favor. let's start with the specifics. pennsylvania. in pennsylvania, the margin of victory now for biden, which is a -- not a victory, it's a fraud. 69,140 votes. the reality is that we are now at a count of 682,770 ballots for which we have affidavits that there was no inspection of that ballot at the time that it was entered in the vote. it was a mail ballot. mail ballots are particularly prone to fraud. we were warned about that by president jimmy carter and secretary baker in a report about a dozen years ago. in which they said that mail

balloting is particularly susceptible of fraud, that we should very carefully consider ever doing it and that it can be taken advantage of. justice suterwarned us -- justice suter warned us in an election case. it's the first time we ever did it en masse and i think we proved that all three are prophets. it's not only susceptible to fraud, it is easily susceptible to fraud particularly if you have a plan which sounds eerily similar to what joe biden told us a few days before the election that he had the best voter fraud team in the world. they were good but i don't know if they were that good because

they made significant mistakes like all crooks do and we caught them. one of them was pushing out republican inspectors. every state. almost every civilized country. even tanzania and places you wouldn't think of have rules about inspectors particularly for mail-in ballots, and why particularly mail-in ballots? because they can easily be defrauded and you can't check on it. people who have never done a mail-in ballot -- i'm going to show you why it's so easy. you fill out an envelope like this. you put your in new york your assembly district and the precinct in which you are voting, fill out your name and address and you sign it. you then use an inner envelope and you put the ballot inside the inner envelope, you seal it all and you send it in.

when it's being counted, almost invariably in the united states up until the mass cheating that went on in this election a republican and a democrat inspector as well as others if there are other parties is allowed to watch the unsealing of this ballot. it used to go on all over america when we conducted honest elections. because the only time you can ever find out if it's a fraudulent ballot is when it is looked at. the minute you approve this, it's thrown away, gone for eternity. the only thing left is the vote. thwack have been mickey mouse. that could have been a dead president. that could have not been filled out properly. that could have been the same person 30 teams. all these things have happened, by the way. that could have been nothing filled out.

we would never know. the recount done in georgia will tell us nothing because these fraudulent votes will be counted again because they couldn't supply the signatures to match the ballots so is means nothing to have counted these ballots because for example in pennsylvania, where we have probably our most precise, 600,000 of these ballots were cast, put in and they weren't inspected which renders them balthe ones that are null and void. cannot be counted. have to be removed from the vote. why? for several reasons. not the least of which is that was basically only one of two places in the state where it was done. in the other parts of the state there was a legitimate inspection of the ballot. if you have two different standards in davenport parts --

in different parts of the state, that's a classic violation of the equal protection clause of the united states constitution, bush v. gore being the most recent case that teaches that. that's not the only fraud that went on in pennsylvania. all the other frauds carried out by the democrat bosses happened there as well. for example. if you made a mistake in that ballot, and you lived in philadelphia or in pittsburgh, you were allowed to fix the mistake. but if if you lived in what would be considered more republican or trump parts of the state, you were given no such right. one of our plaintiffs, mr. henry, cast an absentee ballot and he failed to put it

in the secure envelope inside. he just put it in open. naked. that ballot was cast aside. because it was invalid. because that breaks the privacy of the vote. in pittsburgh and in philadelphia, the state noticed if there wasn't an inner envelope they would contact the voter and allow him to vote again or if he didn't fill it out completely or if he made a mistake and didn't sign his full name he was allowed to cure it. the democrat secretary of state made that up in order to maximize the votes in philadelphia and pittsburgh and to minimize the votes in the other parts of the state. clearly illegal. clearly voter fraud. easily proveable. hundreds of witnesses. maybe thousands.

i'll give you another example. we have 17,000 provisional ballots cast in pittsburgh. do you know what a provisional ballot is in a provisional ballot usually happens this way. about 15,000 of the 17,000 hatched this way. you walk in and you say i'm here to -- happened this way. you walk in and you say i'm here to vote today. they say mr. giuliani, you already voted? i did? i don't remember voting. yes, you cast an absentee ballot. no, you didn't. yes, i did. no, you didn't. why did that happen 17,000 times in pittsburgh? people walked in thinking they -- actually, 15,000 to be precise, why did it happen 15,000 times that people in pittsburgh walked in to vote and they had already voted according to the democrat election

machine? did they forget? that many people with bad memories in pittsburgh? or is the following correct that as will testify they were instructed by the democrat bosses when they had a ballot in which there was no one registered, just assign it to somebody. just assign it to rudy giuliani. so when rudy giuliani -- maybe rudy giuliani wouldn't show up to vote. and if he does show up to vote we'll give him a provisional ballot. that is what we call circumstantial evidence of the fraud. the direct evident of the fraud are people who will testify that in fact that's what happened to them. as well as the 50 to 60 witnesses we have to the way they were treated and not allowed to inspect the ballots. they weren't just not allowed to do it. they were pushed. in a few cases they were

assaulted. in all cases they were put in a corral. so far away, probably the closest they got is from here to the back of that room. we could do like a -- did you all watch "my cousin vinnie"? one of my favorite law movies because he comes from brooklyn and when the nice lady said she saw and he says to her how many fingers do i got up? and she says, "three." she was too far away to see it was only two. these people were further away than my cousin vinnie was from the witness. they couldn't see a thing. i don't know. are you going to tell me that 60 people are lying? they didn't just tell me this. they swore under penalty of perjury which is something new democrat has ever done. you don't even ask biden about this.

he doesn't get asked questions about all the evidence of the crimes that he committed. these people are under penalty of perjury. their names are on an affidavit. they swear that they weren't allowed to carry out their function as inspectors and it's not just a technical thing. there is a reason they did it. why would you not allow people to carry out the function they have been allowed to do for 50 years, 60 years? why wouldn't you allow inspections of those ballots? because you knew you were going to use those ballots to catch biden up. and you had a big road ahead of you. you had to catch him up for 700,000-800,000 votes he was behind and the only way you were going to do it was with the mail-in ballots. you couldn't have a democrat and republican inspector around.

they don't even have democrats watching. they would be afraid there were honest democrats who would say you're cheating. that takes us to michigan where there was an honest democrat who said they were cheating. we'll show you her affidavit. because i know you keep reporting falsely that we have no evidence. that we have no specific acts of fraud. that's because of coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme itself. the american people are entitled to know this. you don't have a right to keep it from them. you don't have a right to lie about it. and you are. you don't report to them that a citizen of this country, a very fine woman who is willing to allow me to give her -- give you her name, i can't give you all these affidavits because if i do these people will be harassed. they'll be threatened.

they may lose their job. they will lose their friends. we've lost lawyers in this case balls they have been threatened. we have lawyers that need protection. what's going on in this country is horrible and the censorship that you are imposing is making it worse but jesse jacob is an adult citizen and a resident of the state of michigan. she's been an employee of the city of detroit for decades. i know her age but she can tell you her age. she was assigned to voting duties in september and she was trained by the city of detroit and the state of michigan. she was basically trained to cheat. she says that "i was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of the absentee packages to be dated earlier

than when they were actually sent in. the supervisor made that announcement for all workers to engage in that fraudulent practice. that's not me saying that. that's just american citizens saying that under oath. i don't know. maybe you could say she's lying. but you can't say there is no evidence. this is what we call evidence. this is direct evidence. not circumstantial evidence. i tried many cases as did all of my colleagues here. you put a witness on the witness stand, the witnesses testifying to their own knowledge. this witness goes on the witness stand and she will say i was told to adjust the date on the absentee ballots. i witnessed election workers and employees going over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.

completely illl. she will testify to that. you can cross-examine her but you can't say there was no evidence. next time you say that you will be lying because there is evidence. by the way, this is public. you can all get it. it's attached to a complaint in costantino versus the city of detroit. then she was instructed "by my supervisor not to ask for a driver's license or photo i.d. when a person was trying to vote." don't ask for identification. why would you not ask for identification? because you knew a lot of people not entitled to vote were going to come in and early vote because you knew that illegal immigrants were going to be allowed to vote. you knew if you lived in philadelphia unless you're -- that's an italian expression for

stupid -- unless you're stupid you knew that a lot of people were coming over from camden to vote. they do every year. happens all the time in philly. it's about as frequent as getting beaten up as a philadelphia eagles football game. happens all the time. all the time. it's allowed to happen because it is a democrat, corrupt city and has been for years. many, many years. they carried it out in places they could get away with it. they didn't carry it out in neutral places. they didn't carry it out in republican places. they didn't carry it out in places where the law is respected. they carried it out in a place where the district attorney releases criminals en masse which is why they have so much crime. she stated they had already applied for and submitted an absentee ballot. she observed people voting

twice. this is jessie jacobs, not me. "i was instructed not to invalidate any ballots and not to look for any deficiencies in the ballots." why would you do that? because you're on purpose cheating. intentionally cheating. you're cheating as an institution. this is an instruction from the election commission or the employer to the worker. don't look for any deficiencies in the ballot. "i was instructed not to look at any of the signatures on the absentee ballots." if she was instructed to look -- not to look for any signatures on the absentee ballots, why the heck do you sign it in the first place? in order to identify it. she was instructed not to do

that because many of the absentee ballots were fraudulent and they knew that and they didn't want to have a count of that. on november 4, 2020 "i was instructed to improperly predate the absentee ballots when the receipt date was actually november -- was after november 3rd, 2020. now, this is really significant because justice alito of the supreme court instructed pennsylvania that any ballot that comes in after 8:00 on november 3rd, 2020 had to be put aside and not opened because there was a question as to its legality and its constitutionality. what she's telling you is that they blatantly disregarded that order. that they took ballots marked the fourth and the fifth and the sixth and marked it down for the third in blatant disregard of the order from the united states

supreme court. this is -- i don't know if she's a democrat or a republican. i assume if she's working for the -- i assume if she's working for the city of detroit that she's a democrat. i assume. but i may be wrong. she's a citizen. i've never met her, never coached her. i would like to note that it's signed under penalty of perjury. i can't show them to you because these people don't want to be harassed, they don't want to have their lives torn apart by the goons on the other side. we don't do that to them. they've done that to a lot of our people and they've done it for four years and it's outrageous that it's tolerated and it's tolerated because you condone it in the press.

you don't cover it. you don't condemn it. it shouldn't happen to a republican or a democrat. i lawyer shouldn't have to withdraw from a case because he's representing the president of the united states. there are many more affidavits here. i would like to read them all to you but i don't have the time. you should have had the time to go look for that. that's your job. like it's my job to defend the president and to represent the president. it's your job to read these things and not falsely report that there is no evidence. do you know how many affidavits we have in the michigan case? 220 affidavits. they're not all public but eight of them are. four afiants report an incident that under any -- four affiants report an incident that would be reported if you didn't have a pathological hatred for the

president. they swear that at 4:30 in the morning a truck pulled up to the detroit center where they were counting ballots. the people thought it was food so they all ran to the truck. it wasn't food. it was thousands and thousands upon of ballots. and the baloses were in garbage cans. they were in -- the ballots were in garbage bags, paper bags and taken into the center and put on a number of tables. at that time they thought all the republican inspectors had left. all but two had. and an employee of dominion. whoa we will address a little bit later. dominion. here is what they jointly swear to. that every ballot that they could see. everything they could hear. these were ballots for biden. when they saw a ballot, these were ballots only for biden.

meaning there was no down-ticket. many of them didn't have anything on the outer envelope because these ballots were produced very quickly, very swiftly and they're estimated to be a minimum of 60,000, a maximum of 100,000. many of them were triple counted which means they were put into the counting machines this way. once. twice. three times. i didn't see that. i don't know that but fort for the fact that three american citizens are willing to swear to it and we're not going to let them go to court and do that, we're going to let this election go by when there are in in this case 60 witnesses that can prove what i'm saying to you and other acts of fraud in michigan? what's happened to this country

if we're going to let that happen? what's happened to this country if we're going to cover that up? we let al gore in an election dispute for loenger than this and for chads, this happened in pennsylvania, it happened in michigan, michigan probably right now if i count up the affidavits, just one case alone, trump v. benson, a case we dismissed today because that case was attempting to get the wayne county board of supervisors to decertify. well, they did. they decertified. that case has 100 affidavits and the 100 affidavits show essentially what i have talked to you about. counting ballots improperly. counting them three and four times. having people vote three and four times. changing and back-dating ballots to the point of at least 300,000

illegitimate ballots that we can specifically identify. the margin in michigan was 146,121 and these ballots were all basically cast in detroit that biden won 80-20 so you see it changes the results of the election in michigan if you take out wayne county. so it's a very significant case. that is being raised in the case of costantino versus the city of detroit. not by us but by an individual plaintiffment we are helping and assisting in that case, however, and you can find all the affidavits that you want filed in that case. you can find out they're not just accusations. they're allegations reported by supported by sworn testimony which joe biden doesn't answer questions much less give you sworn affidavits. wisconsin. wisconsin has a very small margin.

20,544 last time i looked. in wisconsin, without going into great detail, very similar plan. republicans shut out in the city of milwaukee. and also in madison. republicans uniformly shut out from the absentee process, not allowed to inspect, not allowed to look at the ballots. we have in milwaukee and in the state of wisconsin a much stricter law. wisconsin doesn't allow mail-in ballots. they didn't buy into the big mail-in ballot situation. wisconsin, when you look at their constitution almost seems not to like absentee ballots. they say it's not a right, it's a privilege and they have very strict procedures and the strict procedure says that you can't be given an absentee ballot. you have to personally apply for it. it's illegal basically to solicit a vote and they have

actually many reasons for it. it probably goes back to their progressive days. when i say progressive i mean late 19th century, early 20th century progress when that meant progressive not retrogressive so there are 60,000 ballots in milwaukee county and 40,000 ballots in madison that as far as we can tell, and this is why we are auditing because we have very good information that the numbers are going to come out about here that don't have applications. under the law of the state of wisconsin, already decided if there is no application for an absentee ballot, the absentee ballot is thrown away. this all happened in two places in wisconsin. it didn't happen in northern wisconsin. it didn't happen in republican wisconsin. it didn't happen in neutral wisconsin where there are an

equal number of republicans and democrats. it happened in the place where the vote was 75-80% for the democrat. you take away any number of those, and that 20,000 lead disappears. in other words, if you count the lawful votes, trump won wisconsin by a good margin. indeed, if if you count the lawful votes in pennsylvania, he won it by about 300,000 votes. also, in the lawsuit filed in wisconsin which is really a petition because of their procedures there were no inspectors provided for the count of the illegal ballots, there were numerous back-dated ballots, we're just counting them now, run over into the thousand and there were many precincts in which there was an overvote. let me explain to you what an overvote is, which is something you should have explained to the american people because it's about the clearest circumstantial evidence of

massive fraud that you can have. all the vote is if 200% of the people who are registered in a district vote -- think about that. 200% of the registered voters in a district vote, what does that mean? that means somebody voted twice. that means somebody who is not entitled to vote, voted. an illegal, a person from another city or state, a person who is not registered. what it means is that those are illet votes. you don't have an overvote of 200% or 300%. you don't have an overvote of 100%. most precincts don't have a 100% turnout. in fact, classically it's considered to be an overvote if if you go over 80%. well, in michigan and wisconsin we have overvotes in numerous

precincts. of 150%. 200%. and 300%. one of the reasons why the two republicans did not certify in wayne, michigan -- wayne county, michigan is because the overvote was so high. monstrously high in about 2/3 of the precincts in the city of detroit which means magically two and three times the number of registered voters turned out to vote. we have precincts in which 200 times the number of people who live there including children voted. that's absurd. the frustration of this is we're describing is a massive fraud. it isn't a little teeny one. it isn't a hundred votes switched here or there. georgia. we're about to file a major

lawsuit in georgia. that will be filed probably tomorrow. i don't need to go through it. virtually the same things i told you before. in the city of atlanta, republicans were not allowed to watch the absentee mail-in ballot process: inspections completely cast aside. we have numerous double voters, numerous out of state voters and specific evidence of intimidation and changes of votes. that will all be in the lawsuit that comes out tomorrow. arizona is a state that we're looking at very, very carefully. i would say we're probably going to bring a lawsuit in arizona. more than probably. i think we are going to bring a lawsuit in arizona. we're still collecting that evidence. and the state that we're looking at that would surprise you is we have very, very significant amount of fraud allegations in the state of new mexico.

which -- and we have a significant number of allegations in the state of virginia. i don't know yet whether the number in virginia will reach the number that can turn the election. in the states that we have indicated in red, georgia, pennsylvania, michigan, wisconsin, nevada and arizona, we more than double the number of votes needed to overturn the election in terms of proveable, illegal walballots. all you've got to do to find out if i'm misleading you at all is to look at the lawsuit. look what's alleged. look at the affidavits. maybe we can supply more affidavits. in order to do it i have to get permission from the people but in the materials i have here there are at least 10 that come from citizens. we have a thousand at least and we're getting more every day. and there are other aspects of this fraud that at this point i

really can't reveal. this is really enough. it's enough to overturn any election. it's disgraceful what happened. and i'll conclude by asking you to just think about this for a minute. what happened on the morning of november 3rd they were going to count this new kind of ballot, this mail-in ballot? did any democrat leader in pennsylvania and in michigan and in wisconsin and in georgia and in nevada and in arizona -- did they all wake up and all separately have the same idea? did they all separately have the idea that we are going to -- we're going to put republican inspectors in pens, we're not going to let them look at mail movie in and absentee ballots? they all independently come up with that? just by coincidence? they say, you know, we're going

to put republicans in pens and corrals. we're going to do it in pittsburgh. we're going to do it in philadelphia. we're going to do it in detroit. we're going to do it in milwaukee. we're going to do it in las vegas. we're going to do it in phoenix. we're going to do it in atlanta. or isn't the logical conclusion that i think any jury will accept if they had this evidence that somebody had the plan? maybe that was always the plan to do this very, very questionable form of voting which has been criticized by president carter, by secretary baker, by most experts on election reform? i think the logical conclusion is this is a common plan. a common scheme that comes right directly from the democrat party and it comes from the candidate. clearly. that's the reason why hillary clinton said don't concede.

even if you're losing. that's the reason we had a freudian slip by the candidate when he said he had the best voter-fraud team in the country. that's the reason why he probably didn't have to go out and campaign. he had to have known what they were going to do. this had to be planned in advance. i'm kind of checking, did they go to the same contractor to get the corrals to put the republicans in? and this is a disgraceful thing that was done in this country. probably not much more disgraceful than the things these people did in office which you didn't and don't bother to cover and you conceal from the american people. but when you let this happen, we use largely a venezuelan voting machine. in essence. to count our vote. if we let this happen, we're going to become venezuela. we cannot let this happen to us. we cannot allow these crooks,

because that's what they are tow steal an election from the american people. they elected donald trump. they didn't elect joe biden. joe biden is in the lead because of the fraudulent ballots. the illegal ballots. that were produced and that were allowed to be used after the election was over. give us an opportunity to prove it in court and we will. now i'm going to ask sidney powell to describe to you what we can describe about another totally outrageous situation. i don't think most americans know but our ballots get calculated, many of them, outside the united states and are completely open to hacking. completely open to change. and it's being done by a company that specializes in voter fraud. i'll let sidney describe that to

you. >> thank you, road i >> thank you, rudy. what we are unkofrlg is interference in our elections here in the united states. the dominion voting system, the smartmatic software and the software that goes in other computerized voting systems as well, not just dominion were created in venezuela at the direction of hugo chavez to make sure he never lost an election after one constitutional referendum came out the way he did not want it to come out. we have one very strong witness who has explained how it all works.

his affidavit is attached to the pleadings of lin wood and the lawsuit he filed in georgia. it is a stunning, detailed affidavit because he was with hugo chavez while he was being briefed on how it worked. he was with hugo chavez when he saw it operate. to make sure the election came out his way. that was the expressed purpose for creating this software. he has seen it operate. as soon as he saw the multiple states shut down the voting on the night of the election, he knew the same thing was happening here. that that was what had gone on. now, the software itself was created with so many variables and so many backdoors that can be hooked up to the internet or a thumb drive stuck in it or whatever but one of its most characteristic features is its ability to flip votes. it can set and run an algorithm

that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from president trump and flip them to president biden which we might never have uncovered had the votes for president trump not been so overwhelming in so many of these states that it broke the algorithm that had been plugged into the system, and that's what caused them to have to shut down in the states they shut down in. that's when they came in the backdoor with all the mail-in -- mail-in ballots. many of which they had actually fabricated. some were on pristine paper with identically matching perfect circled dots for mr. biden. others were shoved in in batches. they are always put in a certain number of batches and people would rerun the same batch. this corresponds to our statistical evidence that shows incredible spikes in the vote counts at particular times and that corresponds to eyewitness

testimony of numerous people who have come forward and said that they saw the ballots come in the backdoor at that time. notably, these dominion executives are nowhere to be found now. they are moving their offices overnight to different places. their office in toronto was shared with one of the source entities. one of the leaders of the dominion project overall is lord malit brown, mr. soros's number two-person in the u.k. and part of his organization. there are ties of the dominion leadership to the clinton foundation and to other known politicians in this country. just to give you a brief description of how this worked, i'm going to quote from a letter that was written and i will read that to make sure i get the quotes right. this person was objecting to the

united states acquisition of sapoya voting systems by smartmatic. i believe this election raises the exact foreign ownership issues that sifius. smartmatic is foreign owned and part of sequoia, they keep changing the names, different times when a problem comes up they create a different corporation and call it a different name but it was a voting machine company doing business in the united states. sequoia voting machines were used to record over 125 million votes during the 2004 presidential election in the united states. smartmatic now acknowledges that antonio mejita, a venezuelan businessman has controlling business in smartmatic, that the company has not revealed who all the smartmatic owners are. according to the press the owners are hidden through a web

of offshore private entities and that is in fact true, smartmatic with the venezuelan government run by hugo chavez communistic and really brutalize its own people, the same system has been continued there by mr. maduro and ensured his election. smartmatic's possible connection to the venezuelan government poses a possible national security concern in its acquisition of sequoia because electronic voting machines are susceptible to tampering and insiders are in the best position to engage in such tampering. this letter expresses concern of the chicago 2006 primary election and it ends by saying the product and services that are of venezuelan origin and evaluate smartmatic's ownership to determine who can have influence and control over these and other sequoia products and services are important to the national security of the united states. this letter was written to hank

paulsen on october 6, 2006 by congresswoman carolyn b. maloney. senators klobuchar and warren have raised these concerns as recently as september 2019. why our government has not taken them seriously is beyond my comprehension unless they have of the three-letter agencies have used them themselves in other parts of the world. we know that the technology was exported to affect an election in argentina. admitted by our friend who wrote the affidavit about hugo chavez and his interest in smartmatic. again, in 2006, carolyn maloney wrote the honorable john snowe, secretary of the treasury about the issues speaking of smartmatic's leadership, one of the smartmatic patent holders, eric kumar, i believe his name

is on the web as being recorded in a conversation with antifa members saying that he had the election rigged for mr. biden. nothing to worry about here. and they were going to f trump. his social media is filled with hatred for president trump and the united states as a whole as are the social accounts of many other smartmatic people. there has been widespread use of this. dominion itself utilized in 2,000 injurieses in 30 states. -- 2,000 jurisdictions in 30 states. experts described it across the board from a princeton group of three professors to experts that we have talked to about its end-user vulnerabilities. people can admittedly go in and change whatever they want.

they can set the ratio of votes from one thing to another. they can say that a biden vote counts as 1.25 and a trump vote counts as 0.75 and those may be the numbers that were actually used here. it's not just the swing states that were affected. the algorithm was likely run across the country to affect the entire election. like i said, we only discovered it this year because of the overwhelming number of votes for president trump in the swing states that caused the machines to have to shut down for them to have to backfill for adding votes. we have evidence of different numbers of votes being injected into the system. the same, identical, unique, fixed-digit number multiple times in at least two states that we have analyzed so far. 300,000 for biden, 100,000 for

trump, there is no logical explanation for the same numbers being injected 20 minutes apart in the machine. the software manual itself, you can download it from the internet 1k3i8d encourage you all to read -- internet and i would encourage you all to read it. why it was ever allowed into this country is beyond my comprehension and why nobody has dealt with it is absolutely appalling. the machines were easily accessible to hackers. there is video on the net that will explain to you how a kid with a cell phone can hack one of these voting machines. there has been no oversight of dominion or its software. workers in each county were trained by dominion but there is no evidence of any monitoring otherwise. we have testimony of workers admitting they were trained how on dispose of trump votes and add to biden votes. the software has a feature pursuant to which you can drag

and drop any number of batches of votes to the candidate of your choice or simply throw them away, so we have mathematical evidence in a number of states of massive quantities of trump votes being trashed. simply put in the trash like you would on your computer with any file and biden votes being injected. there is the algorithm that runs that automatically flips all the votes and then each operator has the ability to go in, override settings. they can ignore a signature. they can ignore the top line of the baloat. they can go down-ballot and select who they want to change the results for. the gentleman who founded smartmatic, there is video of him on the internet explaining that yes, in at least one occasion he admits they changed a million votes with no problem.

many of the jurisdictions that have had this problem might not have known of the issue. but many did and i think a full-scale criminal investigation needs to be undertaken immediately by the department of justice and by every state equivalent. attorney general's office or state investigatory unit because there is evidence of different benefits being provided to the people who spent $100 million of taxpayer money at the last minute for their states to get the dominion voting systems put in in time for this election in different ways, there is one person that a lawyer told me got quote election insurance meaning that he would be able to make sure he was elected. i'm sure they explained that feature in detail to many people who expressed interest in putting this voting system in.

texas denied the dominion system but there are questions with the software texas used unbecomboens to texas since they went to great trouble to reject dominion but other software, the source code that does the alterations is embedded we have been told in the source codes all across the country and all the voting machines. there is no doubt it has been used to alterex lections in other countries. we know specifically that venezuela exported it for that purpose to argentina and other latin american countries to make sure that the corrupt rulers who were willing to pay the highest price for being in office were allowed to rig their elections. this is stunning. heartbreaking. infuriating. and the most unpatriotic acts i can even imagine for people in this country to