see you next "fox news sunday." ♪ ♪ ♪ mark: hello america i'm mark within and this is "life, liberty and levin". we've been receiving a lot of disinformation and misinformation about how litigation works, about fraud, about the constitution. you basically been hearing it's people sitting in the chairs in washington dc studios or manhattan studios telling you there is no evidence of fraud or where the is the evidence and there's not enough evidence to change the election results.

you also have been hearing from serious constitutional arguments about the equal protection clause or even article two of the constitution gives the authority solely to the state legislator to make election laws not judges, not secretary of state's and consent decrees. nobody but the state legislator. i will try to sort this out for you a little bit here. first of all, when people, television and they say where's the evidence? i want to see the evidence for it i want to see all the evidence but to have enough evidence not just this, that or the other but let me slain how civil litigation works. this is in criminal litigation. the trumpet campaign does not have a grand jury and they don't have the fbi investigators and they don't have subpoena power. they are bringing civil suits. now, let me explain this. to file a civil complaint you need a reasonable basis and in fact and law. allegations can be made on

information and belief. the motion to dismiss test the legal sufficiency of the complaint assuming everything in the complaint as true does it state a claim upon which relief can be granted. for a motion to be dismissed everything is assumed to be true and all reasonable inferences are granted to the plaintiff and if the judge still does not think that there could possibly be a case, even down the road after discovery, he or she will dismiss the case for it one of the things that troubles me greatly is the number of cases that the term campaign have brought have been dismissed and in my view we should have been dismissed. with the media does rather than explain the nature of the case and what it is that the trump campaign is alleging they just say they lost another case and was dismissed. why? now, let's talk about discovery. expedited discovery. you bring a case and you have to pass the motion to dismiss

standard, which typically is fairly easy. you don't need all this evidence for a court to accept the case as i explained and then you can seek expedited discovery to gather all the evidence that you think is out there. and expedited discovery can be granted by a court and often is. when injunctive relief is sought by tipperary restraining order and/or pulmonary injunction depending upon the need for proper revolution and we have now given the clock that discovery can be ordered immediately. if the judge can do it right at the desk ordered in courts of the power to speed discovery along and very fast. now, let's talk about, as an example, this dominion voting system. unexplained, significant deviations from expected resul results. for instance, mathematical inconsistencies supported by experts. in other words, expert testimony given an affidavit should be more than sufficient to establish a reasonable basis to

file a complaint and justify expedited fast discovery. it's all wrong when here legal analysts and hosts say where is all the evidence? this is a civil suit. you have the part you need to pass, so your case is not dismissed and then you conduct discovery. written discovery, document demands, depositions and so forth on an expedited level and that is how it is supposed to work. it is frustrating to me to listen and watch people who have no experience in civil litigation, know nothing about civil litigation or form a federal prosecutors and professors who should know better saying the same thing for political operatives with whiteboards and i'm afraid there is no evidence we don't have the evidence. if judges prevent the trump campaign from going forth. for example, involving the dominion voting systems they are never going to gather the quote

unquote evidence necessary in a trial. in a court proceeding or seeking some kind of remedy or relief because you don't go to court with boxes and boxes full of evidence. sometimes you can but you not required to. all this talk from republicans senators who have no idea what they are talking about, mitt romney, ben sass was just elected so he's not all worked up about anything, adam kingsl kingsley, maybe it is, maybe it isn't but why won't they embrace our legal system and why won't they embrace our constitutional system? why will they encourage the courts to go ahead efficiently to act on these cases so we can get to the bottom of it and there is reasons to be concerned, ladies and gentlemen. there are different kinds of cases the trump campaign is bringing. number one, of the sort i just said they want to test this machine system, either now or in a very near future with a filing but they are getting their

experts lined up and getting their affidavits lined up. how do i know? because unlike most i have asked them. number two, you have cases of actual frauds. the trump campaign in various cities and states have collected hundreds and hundreds of signed affidavits under penalty of perjury from election workers, from state officials from the civilians, hundreds and hundreds that is hundreds and hundreds more than they ever had in the russian collusion hoax. so, these are serious cases that they are bringing great i can't help it. i can't help if judges are getting nervous and don't want to pursue it or their obama appointees or left-wing robed justices as you have the majority on the supreme court of pennsylvania just like you had in florida in 2000 on the supreme court of florida. what other kinds of cases, constitutional cases are being brought, very serious cases under article two section one clause two. with the united states up in

court associative justice sam alito has already reached into pennsylvania twice and ordered them to protect certain ballots in case the court rules that what the pennsylvania supreme court did may be unconstitutional but what am i talking about? article two, section one, clause two of the united states constitution. each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislator, specifically say the legislator. you won't find that many places in the constitution where they specific about that but the legislator there may direct a number of electors equal to whole number of senators and are presented gives to which the state may be entitled in the congress. in other words, the state legislator makes election laws and i can tell you for my own research way, way back there is no way the framers of the constitution or the ratification conventions would have approved this constitution if the legislators themselves weren't in charge of the voting systems. you need to understand there was

no federal government. they created this federal government. the states had to buy into it and in one of the areas where the states said we will only buy into it if you protect our authority and underscore our authority to determine what the election laws are. so when you have an pennsylvania supreme court or you have a consent decree in georgia or even have a federal judge in michigan or things of that sort going on interfering with decisions by the state legislators that is unconstitutional and that should be raised and how many ballots did that affect? nobody knows that it could be hundreds and hundreds of thousands. now, as was pointed out by abc news some time ago, let's talk about these changes. you know why there's litigation going on? do want to know why it is taking so long because the democrats and their surrogates in the biting campaign brought over 200-300 lawsuits in the lead up to the election, to change the

voting systems in each state. the trump campaign is trying to address them now and confront them and deal with them because all of these cases that involve the democrats were intended to make fraud easier, if not institutionalize it. they write in abc thanks to legal challenges from voting rights advocates many left-wing democrats and their party some states typically require ballots to be received by polls closing time will now except ballots postmarked by election day for the 2020 election. the pennsylvania sabine court said we don't care if there's a postmark. we'll care if there's a signature, we don't care if the signatures don't match. that was a case brought by the democratic governor who cannot get these things for the republican legislator. they went into the court and got it from the democrats on the supreme court. in the three blue all states to present one in 2016 they wrote, michigan, penciling at her most johnson judges have recently issued rulings that extend the deadline for mail ballots to be

received. judges. the text of the constitution says that's unconstitutional. judges don't get to make that decision whether state judges or federal judges. that's in michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin. in michigan a quart a claims judge, the lowest judge there is in the state ordered clerks to accept ballots that are postmarked by november 2 and received within 14 days of the election paid the deadline for results to be certified. these ballots have to be counted as provisional ballots. legislator did not pass that. the republicans do not agree to that. it was u.s. federal district judge ruled that ballots postmarked by november 3 can be counted as long as they are received by november 9. the legislator did not do that in wisconsin. in pennsylvania -- these are republican legislators being overruled by courts by these voting advocates. democrats are bringing these cases. in pennsylvania not only will mail ballots that are postmarked on or before 8:00 p.m. on

election day and received by 5:00 p.m. the friday after it be counted due to a ruling from the state supreme court any ballots that arrive within that timeframe without a postmark or within unreadable postmark, will be presumed to have been sent before the cutoff point, unless evidence indicates otherwise. that is a violation of the federal constitution. state laws do not provide for that. in minnesota ballots postmarked by election day received within a week after the election will be counted both massachusetts and kentucky are allowing postmarked ballots received by november 6 to be counted and in new jersey and it goes on and on, these changes have been taking place and noticed this, i don't know of a single newsroom that is put a chart on the monitor to show you all the changes that occurred in the last year or so, even in the last 90 days, in the states, by court order or by decisions of secretary of state or boards of elections to get around republican legislators. this is a highly abuse and

controversial election across the country. in georgia a federal judge ruled that ballots postmarked by election day will count. if election officials get them by the third day after the election but the secretary of state, republican national committee, they are challenging this order but you have courts that are stepping in and changing the election laws. this is really quite shocking. trump campaign loss lawsuit in nevada seeking to stop the state from the mailing out ballots among other pursuits and nevada changed its mail in procedures that they are mailing it to these election halls 60 days before the election. sixty days and then they put in ballot harvesting. it's ended a controversial way of checking signatures that of course, excluded any republican observer. you can go on in new jersey and other states and these are very serious matters. when you have politicians who are just out there saying, like

romney who has no idea -- neither has been sass mr. constitution. he is not mr. constitution. what should happen in the states? what should've happened and what should have happened is these are public and state legislators in pennsylvania and michigan and these other states georgia and so forth, they should have issued a resolution early on stating that we, under the federal constitution, have an oath and a duty to ensure that article two is upheld and that we make the election laws, not anybody else. that the election laws that were in place but changed by federal and state courts or by secretary of state or election board are null and void and all counts should be based on the election laws that we put in place that were unconstitutionally author authored. any votes beyond that, any votes

beyond that are illegal and unconstitutional and if you will cry about this disenfranchisement blamed the democrats, the courts and the people who did that. that is how you have a constitutional vote. that is why that matters and i also thought the united states chief on the united states supreme court, john roberts, chief justice he could have killed this right away. several weeks ago when he should have voted with the others and the other originalists and associative brett kavanaugh instead of letting pennsylvania get away with what it did but what they should have ruled is for pennsylvania and for every other state the constitution is the constitution for an article to leaves it to the legislator. any changes done by any court, local, state or federal, done by any public official, governor, secretary of state, members of any boards of election are per

se unconstitutional and all counts will be based on the federal constitution what the state legislators have passed. if they had done this, almost none of this would be going on. almost none of this. to those people that say biden one, let's get it over with and move along, if you believe in the rule of law and if you believe in the constitution and if you believe in the nature of civil litigation that there needs to be some discovery with the dominion voting system, and other activities that took place when we literally have hundreds of affidavits of fraud and if you believe in that system then it shouldn't be cut short. otherwise the entire integrity of your franchise is called into question and it will happen in 2022 and 2024. this isn't the republicans won't let biden be seated. this is the democrats they created a chaos and anarchy. judges have created chaos and anarchy and if we don't fix it now we will never fix it.

joe biden better understands that there cannot be unity and there will only be resistance. if he does not join in the call to uphold the constitution and the rule of law and to let these civil procedures progress, notice he has not said it once. not once. i'll be right back. o one more, the lexus december to remember sales event. lease the 2021 rx 350 for $419 a month for 36 months and we'll make your first month's payment. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. and we'll make your first month's payment. what if your clothes could stay fresh for weeks?t smell clean? now they can! this towel has already been used and it still smells fresh. pour a cap of downy unstopables into your washing machine before each load and enjoy fresher smelling laundry for up to 12-weeks.

it's time you make the rules.

so join the 2 million people who have switched to xfinity mobile. you can choose from the latest phones or bring your own device and choose the amount of data that's right for you to save even more. and you'll get 5g at no extra cost. all on the most reliable network. so choose a data option that's right for you. get 5g included and save up to $400 dollars a year on the network rated #1 in customer satisfaction. it's your wireless. your rules. only with xfinity mobile.

♪ mark: welcome back. we have a great guest who most of you are familiar with, victor davis hanson but i can never hear enough from him. his knowledge of history and philosophy is applied to what's taking place today is central. victor davis hanson, you heard what i had to say and you see there is a huge rush by the democrats, by the establishment republicans and by the media and a lot of ignorance. let's get this over with let's go ahead and coordinate joe biden. how do you look at this? >> i look at the way you do, i'm not a legal scholar like you are but i man historian and observer of temporary events and it's always a constitutional issue with the constitution suggests or does not suggest but delineates the legislators and so are returners of election laws unless the congress l intervene and they haven't in this case.

there were the laws and they were clearly massaged and in some cases violated and they had a difference because when they close election the margins are very thin and those violations may or may not and i think the inconsistencies that you pointed out to show there is real doubt about the election. that is the issue. the left tries to say well, we are two weeks and a half or some the election and three weeks from the electors or whatever happens it's happened. there are some on our side that had a press conference and i understand where they are concerned but 70, 70%, some of them said trump one or millions of votes and so our critics focus on that argument and not what you said, that argument then suggests this is the greatest scandal in the history of the united states at a magnitude we've never seen. it may well be but that's not your point. your point is let's find out if it is or not.

you didn't say i have proof of 70% landslide or big landslide and that's why i wish people would concentrate on the points you made but what you are saying is here is the constitution. here is how even the people who violated it know they violated it in those violations have to be adjudicated because in a close election they may well have altered the result. we have evidence that they might have altered the results because we have these affidavits and inconsistencies and unproven computers and this rush to have mail in early voting because of the covid lockdown. you are saying take a deep breath, followed the constitution and i wish everyone on our side would stick to your argument because what is happening, the critics are coming in and saying you guys claim that it was a landslide so where's the evidence it was a landslide. we didn't say that it may be some people in their exuberance and said that but we were sticking to the constitution and the violations and ramifications. i thank you are spot on.

i wish that people would codify their arguments and consistency with what you said because it's very persuasive argument. mark: now, in addition, it's troubling to me is the strategy of the democrats. these are democrats who brought these lawsuits and basically to soften up the playing field. almost like a military operation for the broad and all the artillery, hammer, hammer, one court after the other and one secretary of state after the other and it was obviously very well coordinated and networked fight mark elias, bob bauer, one of their lawyers who also has been involved in past activities with respect to changing votes and persuading courts and secretaries of states to change votes and it's obvious they looked at 2016, victor david hanson, and said that can't happen again. they said we have to change the rules and they changed the rules may be in a score or more of states particularly the critical

states and they had a plan set out to do exactly this and in none of these cases where the changes have tended to assist the republicans. in none of these changes were intended to promote good government. under these changes they were not intended to ensure the security of the vote. quite the opposite. i can understand and i thank you can understand why people are really troubled by this, even apart from the constitution and the litigation processes that i talk about, wait one minute, what are they doing? we live in 2016 and we knew the answer which we be president at 2:00 a.m. and now look at what is going on. right? >> and it is worse than that because it's 2016, 2020 but we are looking at 2021 and georgia is the last recount because the left to said that they are not interested in changing the policies is much as the mechanisms by which they make policy. we had a heroic effort in the house and we have a heroic

effort to keep the senate and donald trump did a heroic effort but the fact of the matter is there is a good chance that our elected bates will hinge on those two seeds and if we lose those two seats they are not talking about just nationalizing health care they are talking about getting rid of a 232 year electoral college with this national voter contract and they're talking about changing 151 years of tradition with this up in court and they used to do that if they get rid of the senate filibuster and then we are talking about the end of the 60 year tradition of 50 states. once you have a 15 person supreme court and we are within a hair's breath of getting that because we know what will happen. you can have almost anything if you have the house and the presidency and the representatives and the supreme court and the danger is that this could be a replay of what we just saw on november 3. we know what will happen, the polls will be massaging a incredible new blue state

georgia and we will be told that. we will be torn that the runoffs are moderate and that they are no different than bill clinton's third wave. none of this radical stuff will ever make it but the media will blanketed out and big tech will deep platform, check whatever they have to do and the money that we saw in particular states will be nothing compared to the billion dollars that will come in from mike bloomberg and others we've already seen people with andrew yang and tom friedman, columnist from new york times, violate the law and move into georgia and stay there temporarily register and then get out basically. that was the indication which is a felony. what i'm getting at is everything hangs in the balance now and there's no margin for error and if we think georgia is a traditional red state anymore it's had enormous changes in democracy through a legal and illegal immigration and it is

tech center and the suburban metropolis of atlanta and that's 6 million of the 12 million people and if we lose those two seeds i don't thank you and i have ever seen anything like the consequences in our lifetime. were talking about structural changes to the constitution as we know it and to the traditions and protocols of governments for over one century and half. mark: we'll be right back. look at this human trying to get in shape.

you know what he will get? muscle pain. give up, the couch is calling. i say, it's me, the couch, i'm calling. pain says you can't. advil says you can.

working, parenting, problem solving. at new chapter vitamins we've been busy too... innovating, sourcing organic ingredients, testing them and fermenting. fermenting? yeah like kombucha or yogurt. and we formulate everything so your body can really truly absorb the natural goodness. that's what we do, so you can do you. new chapter wellness, well done.

>> live from america's news headquarters great leaders of the world's most powerful nations have wrapped up their group of 20 summit bowing to ensure affordable access to covid-19 vaccines for people around the world. the two-day meeting held virtually focused on battling the coronavirus and supporting the global economy as it suffers from a pandemic that is killed nearly 1.4 million people. others have plunged into pover poverty. those numbers however are not stopping millions of americans from packing their bags for thanksgiving day getaways. airports from coast to coast or crowded and that has infectious disease experts doctor anthony fauci worried and says he fears new cases could hit at the worst time during the december holiday season. i'm jon scott and now back to "life, liberty and levin". ♪ mark: welcome back.

victor davis hanson, the democratic party seems to stand opposite of so many things that we stand for, or principles, traditions, whether you look at our economic system and in so anyways they drew reject capitalism for it when you look at immigration, and so many ways they reject the old immigration system where people have to show loyalty to our culture into our country. they, as you pointed out earlier, reject even the institutions that are set up by the constitution and they seek to effectively burn down the supreme court in the united states senate. you can go one issue after the other so how did they get here? what do they want to take us for crying out loud? >> part of it, mark, is there is an ancient idea from aristotle that the left likes inequality result mandated by government, rather than equality of opportunity. we knew that but what enhance that idea was in the 21st

century with a perfect storm of globalization brought in enormous amounts of wealth from 7 billion people in the world and that concentrated on the two coasts and that is where the universities are and where silicon valley is and that is where wall street, banking and we created this new elitist, this international elite. at the same time we all agreed with nothing is better than legal immigration but we have 59 people who are not born in the united states and taxes the ability of the melting pot, especially when some are here illegally to assimilate them. finally, our means of medication and are dominated now by 20 square miles of silicon valley where it's social media, twitter, facebook, order of a google search and he put all that together and it enhances this ancient idea we will mandate equality. they don't have popular support and that is why they don't run as progressives or hard leftist for joe biden did not run as one and they try to hide that in these candidates and georgia won't do that but they have, the

results mark is think about it, they have social media, entertainment, hollywood, professional sports, the media, academic k-12, the bureaucracy of the administrative state and so all we have is talk radio and the people and a few other avenues on the internet. it's an asymmetrical challenge now and i've never seen such power concentrated in such few venues all in pursuit of an idea that we will be equal one way or the other on the back end and by people who have no intention of being equaled themselves. none of their ideas will apply to them for they will never be subject to the ramifications of their own egalitarian philosophy. they are the anointed and they only want acceptance for themselves but as we saw with gavin newsom and nancy closely violating their own standards of quarantine. mark: it is so frustrating to you as a historian and to me and as i study this history myself is this is so predictable and the autocrats always talk about

the people and the autocrats always talk as if they are populists and when ever decisions they make and no matter how big their iron fist with their police state you can look at the communist china, communist cuba, look at iran, look at russia or wherever you want but they always destroyed the people in the name of the people so what is happening now is we are destroying the constitution and the name of the constitution so we have a lot of work ahead of us and that is why and i don't know if you agree with me but that's why said don't do it on the litigation of this election but we have got to take them on and we got to confront them wherever we can and wherever they are and then we have to learn on go on offense for our liberty and our constitution written otherwise, we will be devoured like everything else, are we not? >> no, we are. the reason they don't like the constitution is it frames why we need a republic not a radical democracy that is why we have two senators from each state, mark. that's why we have the electoral

college appeared we believe that there were certain types of rural living and agriculture, and agrarian is him that offered a check on these urban high density states so that wyoming had something to say about 8 million people how they lived in new york even though it wasn't equal and that whole system is under attack now because people don't want a republic anymore but want a radical democracy for 51% of the people on any given day decide what is good for everybody without constitutional guidelines. that is what i'm scared about that they have rejected the whole idea of a constitutional republic from the nature of the senate to the number of senators in the electoral college to all of that. mark: yeah, a mob. we really don't need a bill of rights, i guess because the bill of rights protects us from government and from the mob. we'll be right back. ♪

♪ i'll be home for christmas

♪ you can count on me ♪ i'll be home for christmas ♪ if only in my dreams ♪ and now your co-pilot.. ♪ if only in my dreams still a father. but now a friend. still an electric car. just more electrifying. still a night out. but everything fits in. still hard work. just a little easier. still a legend. just more legendary. chevrolet. making life's journey, just better. ♪ mark: victor davis hanson, it is

my position that somebody working in the reagan administration and again i've stated history rather extensively and you are a scholar in it, the donald trump should be considered and certainly will be considered among the great presidents. i don't mean the left-wing historians on university and college campuses or those that are guests on msnbc and writing speeches for joe biden but when there is a sober look at what this man dead and has done and hopefully will continue to do but what he did in a four-year time whether the vaccine and these other things under enormous attack, i mean, people wanting to go to prison that he will be viewed as an exceptional present. do you agree with me? >> i do. i'm trying to be empirical despite the fact that i voted for him twice but china, the whole relationship with china,

is recalibrated to the left is now joining in with the right in saying this can't go on. they are not going to be destined to the rule the world just because they have 1.4 billion people. we are not going to let that happen. whether the left says it is the waivers now or hong kong or the right says this is the corruption of the world system but donald trump did that. he took the middle east and completely redefined it, whatever one's political party is saying, it is a more secure, more pro- american, more pro-western and more stable society. iran is losing, losing, losing. they were ascending until donald trump came. we are the largest gas and oil producer in the world and that has given us enormous freedom in the middle east and it is nullified the power of russia and it has terrified china and given a boost to imperial america and then most important, mark, he finally defined the republican party and said we will not be characters as the

aristocratic golfing class which the left used to do good we are a worker middle-class party, upper-middle-class, middle-class, lower middle class. the interior of the united states is not done for. it's not the industrialized or a rust belt but we energy, we got good workers and good infrastructure and less transportation costs. we can make america great. that was the wonderful thing to do and finally you said, you know what, legal immigration great but you can't have a state without borders. you can't have a nation without security and everybody said that it's impossible and he would go for the wall and got mexico to cooperate with us and mexico was actually guarding portions of the border and the result is he restored the idea, at least for now, that the melting pot is something that we should cherish. we want to integrate and assimilate and intermarry. our racial identity is incidental and not essential to who we are. you've got record numbers, not a lot of numbers but record

numbers of african-americans who voted for republican. across the board, if you just to not with the left says or the never trump right and look at the record it is astounding in four years? , i will not even comment on the judges because you know that better than i do and his appointment have been stellar and numerous and they will have a lasting legacy. mark: victor, even looking at the cyrus and the attacks on them have been grotesque despite what some of these governors did to harm their own populations and the president has no control of that. it was obvious to him early on that masks are fine, social distancing is fine, shutdowns are not defined, causing other causing and we need to address this and fixes for here comes this businessman and says alright, i want therapeutics and i want vaccines and i'm going to cut the red tape and i will swing the whip and we will do this as fast as we can without cutting out all safety and health features and we want to those included and we will get

this done by the end of the year and he says he will do it and he's mocked and attacked and there are experts at say it's impossible he's undermined by bureaucrats within his own administration. doctor anthony fauci said it would not have until january 2021 and that's aggressive but tenants and we will have two vaccines and they are already under production in the needles are already under production and the transportations and distributions have already been figured out and i don't think we've ever seen anything like this in american history. take 30 seconds and explain. >> very quickly, look at the record. it takes four, five years for vaccination we never had that and we will get these vaccinations and and we are told were suffering senior like europe but look at the desk per million compared to the uk or italy or spain or belgium or even better, i don't want to use the word and the condos but we are doing as well or better than europe and then we look at the criticism from joe biden and look at it in detail it turns out joe biden's covid strategy

is pretty much copied from donald trump's. he has some little masks all the time, despite as you pointed out, doctor anthony fauci has been all over on the use of masks and on quarantines and who so i don't look at what his critics say he would have done and examine it carefully and i can't see much difference better than they're emulating the trump policy. mark: in the end, donald trump to someone everyone said he couldn't do and he will say, in my view, the vaccine and millions of lives and get americans back to a normal routine. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ they were able to give me a personal loan so i could pay off all of my credit cards. i got my mortgage through sofi and the whole process was so easy. ♪ choosing sofi was literally one of the best decisions i could have ever made because it gave me peace of mind.

♪ she said it was like someone else was controlling her mouth. her doctor said she has tardive dyskinesia, which may be related to important medication she takes for her depression. td can affect different parts of the body. - [narrator] in today's trying times, we're here to help you manage td. visit talkabouttd.com for a doctor discussion guide to prep for your next appointment in person, over the phone, or online. - we were so relieved to learn there are treatments for td. lexus has been celebrating driveway moments. here's to one more, the lexus december to remember sales event.

get 0% financing on all new 2020 and 2021 lexus models. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.

♪ mark: victor davis hanson, where do you see this country in the next two, three years? >> a lot depends on the adjudication of this presidential election and even as importantly, the georgia senate election but let's say for purpose of argument that the supreme court, due to packing and a democratic majority in the senate and in the house, along with a democratic presidency, i think we have a very rough two years but by that i mean i think the middle east will be radically endangered and i think we will have of big out with

china and i think there will be social legislation that we saw in the democratic primary that, by the way, had no support that will become part of our new normal but i'm confident, mark, because i think with hubris comes numbness and within the 2022 midterms we will see something like 2010 and they will corrections with obama and i think the senate if we can hold it we will get even bigger margin but if we don't hold it this time we will win it and i think we are setting the stage for a return of the trump agenda. i mean that that i don't see us going back to romney or john mccain but we have a new republican party and that is inclusive and populist and proud of america's traditions and confident and upbeat. i think there will be a lot to people from all walks of life, as we saw with the candidates they wanted to participate, i'm pretty confident about the long-term future of the country

and we have the best universities in science and math and we have the biggest agricultural exporter in the world and the biggest fuel producer in the world and most stable constitution so we got all these natural meant military so i think we are suffering from a crisis of confidence i think in 2022 we will see a reaffirmation of what we've been talking about today. mark: i also think and let's say god forbid if joe biden is the president and he will do everything he can to one up franklin roosevelt great i really believe that. i think he wants to be a historic figure despite who he actually is and that they will ram through as much legislation through executive orders that they possibly can regardless of the consequences on the people and the irony is, victor davis hanson, i think some of the people who will be hurt the most are some of the people who voted for joe biden. some of the union members, some people in the suburbs and so forth because joe biden will put his foot on the gas pedal and kamala harris will put her foot on the gas pedal and he will

have my thing, fairly radical cabinet and the publican have already hinted that is the cabinet he will get because you know, republicans don't fight like democrats. there will be no investigations or special counsel in the media will protect him and the praetorian guard so we do have a huge fight on our hands but what i hear you saying is don't give up hope and we still have our institutions or what is left of them and we need to continue to fight in our own weight whether the grassroots movement or litigation or whether it's our politicians doing the right thing, don't give up and keep fighting. thirty seconds, final words. >> absolutely. we have to appeal to the american people not to change the rules or manner in which we make these calls prayed we don't want a democratic presidency or supreme court or congress change voting and override a state legislators which i think -- keep the electoral college, keep a 9% court, keep the senate filibuster and keep the institutions and let's agree and

disagree on how we change power but don't change the system because you can't win on it but that is what is fine and i think the american people will understand that. we've got a great system for 233 years we don't have to change it but let's keep it for another 233 years as it is. mark: victor davis hanson, i want to thank you, god bless you and keep at it my friend. >> thank you. mo ♪ so try making it smaller, and you'll be surprised at how easily starting small can lead to something big. start stopping with nicorette.

come out of the dryer wrinkled? starting small can lead to something big. next time try bounce wrinkle guard dryer sheets. the world's first mega sheet with 3x more wrinkle relaxers. the wrinkle guard shirt has less wrinkles and static,

and more softness and freshnes*á bounce out wrinkles with bounce wrinkle guard dryer sheets! ♪ mark: welcome back. you know, those of us who believe in liberty and the constitution, faith and family, we've always been the resistance. the left has always wanted government to smother us in one form or the other but they're all kinds of abstract ideas that they want to impose on us. they don't view us as individual human beings or a family but they want to cancel thanksgiving so what is the big deal and you should not travel on thanks giving so what is the big deal

and all of our subjects have to walk around with masks and so forth and that is their mentality and a totalitarian mentality for those of us who believe in liberty will always be in the resistance but we will always embrace the declaration of the constitution which they do not. i want to say this as clearly as i know how. the democratic party today is more dangerous to what goes on in this country than any of our foreign entities. they seek power and they can get the power to destroy our constitution system, economic system and our way of life. this is not just policy or clinical debate but this is a very, very substantive debate and goes to the core of who we are and how you want to live. i've had no intention of uniting around a party that wants to destroy what i love and i have no intention of uniting around a party that views me with disdain. i have no intention of rolling over, not now and that this litigation, not after the

litigation at all. we are americans and we are red-blooded yanks. we are not going anywhere. this is our country too. we review it and we will keep it. see you next time on "life, liberty and levin". ♪ steve: evening everyone and welcome to the next revolution but i'm steve hylton and his is the home of positive populism, pro- worker, profamily, pro- community and above all pro- american. we are fired up tonight about the lockdowns, about the sickening hypocrisy of democrat lockdown leaders about their assault on religious liberty and about the media and their continuing deranged anti- trump bias and pathetic fawning over biden, all of that coming up with matt gaetz, lisa boothe and charlie kirk. we will see them in a minute but first this. ♪