studies of dogs reactions to sound. there you go. and that's how fox reports this saturday november 28th, 2020 i'm jon scott see you again tomorrow night. thanks a lot. ♪ ♪ >> hello america i'm mark levin this is mark liberty and levin you've been receiving a lot of disinformation and misinformation about how litigation works, about fraud, about the constitution. what you basically have been hearing people sitting in their chairs and washington, d.c. studios or manhattan studios, telling you there's no evidence of fraud where's the evidence? that there's not enough evidence. to change the election results -- you also hearing them dismiss or

poo poo serious constitutional argumentses about equal protection clause. or even article it of the constitution gives the authority solely to state legislature to make election laws not judges not secretary of states and con sent decrees nobody but the state legislature. try to sort this out for you a little bit here. first of all, people come on television and they say, where is the evidence? i want to see the evidence. i want to the see all of the evidence do you have enough evidence not just this side or the other. let me explain how civil litigation works this isn't criminal litigation. the trump campaign doesn't have a grand jury. they don't have fbi investigators. they don't have subpoena power. they're bringing civil suits. now, let me explain this to file a civil complaint, you need a reasonable basis and fact in law. allegations can be made on information and belief. now a motion to dismiss test the

legal sufficiency of the complaint. assuming everything in the complaint is true, does it state a claim upon which relief can be graduated. so for motion to be dismissed, everything is assumed to be true and all reasonable inferences are granted to plaintiff and if the judge still doesn't think that there can be a case after discovery he or she will dismiss the case one that i think troubles me greatly is number of cases that trump campaign have brought have been dismissed. and my view should not have been dismissed. and with the media do is rather than explain the nature of the case, and what it is that the trump campaign is alleging they say they lost another case it was dismissed. why? now, let's talk about the discovery. expedited discovery so you're bringing a case, you have to -- you have to pass the motion to dismiss standard which typically is fairly easy. you don't need all of this

evidence for a court to semithe case as i explained. and then you can seek expedited discovery to gather all of the evidence that you think is out there. and expedited discovery can be granted by a court it often is when injunctive relief is sought by restraining order or preliminary injunction depending upon the need for prompt res lotion and we have one now given the clock. that discovery can be ordered immediately. the judge can do it right at the desk audit courts have the power to speed discovery along and very fast. now,let talk about example as dominion voting system. unexplained significant deviations from expected results. for instance, mathematical insufficient supported by experts in order it is expert testimony given affidavit should be more than sufficient to establish a reasonable basis to file complaint and justify expedited fast discovery.

so it is all wrong when you hear legal analysts and host say where's all of the evidence? where is all of the evidence this is a civil suit. so you have the bar you need to pass so your case isn't dismissed then you conduct discovery. written discovery, document demands, depositions, and so forth are the expedited level that's how it's supposed to work. so it is -- it is frustrating to me to listen and watch people who have no experience and civil litigation. know nothing about civil litigation or form of former prosecutor and professors who should know better saying the same thing or political operatives white boards without white boards i am a afraid there's no evidence we don't have evidence. there's no evidence. so if judges prevent the trump campaign from going forward in, for example, involve the dominion voting is m, they're never gong to gather the quote un, quote, evidence that's necessary in a trial.

in a court proceeding. seeking some remedy or relief because you don't go to court with boxes and boxes full of evidence sometimes you can. but you're not required to and so all of this talk from republican senators who have no idea what they're talking about, mitt romney, ben sasse who was just elected, so he's not all work up about anything. adam it's over already and so forth maybe it is maybe it isn't. but why won't they embrace our legal ?m why won't they embrace our constitutional system and encourage the courts to go ahead efficiently to act on these cases so we can get to the bottom of it. there's reason to be concerned, ladies and gentlemen. there's different kinds of cases the trump campaign is bringing. number one, of the sort i just said they want to test this machine system either now or in a very near future with a filing but they're getting their experts lined up and affidavits lined up.

how do i know because unlike most i've asked them. number two, you have cases of actual fraud the trump campaign and various cities and states have collected hundreds and hundreds of signed affidavits under penalty and perjury from election workers from state officials, trump civilians, hundreds and hundreds -- that's hundreds and hundreds more than they ever had in the russia collusion hoax. so these are serious cases that they're bringing i can't help it. if judges are getting inarches they don't want to pursue it or obama appointee and left wing rogue justices as you have the majority on the supreme court of pennsylvania. just like you have in 2000 the supreme court of florida. what other kinds of cases constitutional cases are being brought. very serious cases. under article 2 section 1 clause 2 with the united states supreme court associate already reached down into pennsylvania twice.

and ordered them to protect certain ballots incase case rules may be unconstitutional what am i talking about? article 2 section 1 clause 2 of the united states constitution. each state shall appoint in such manner as the legislature. they specifically say the legislature. you won't find that in many places of the constitution. where they're specific about that. the legislature there have made a direct equal to number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in congress in other words the state lelgtture makes election laws and i can tell you from my own research, way, by back -- there's no way the framers of the constitution or the ratification convention would have approved this constitution if the legislatures themselves weren't in charge of the voting systems. weren't setting laws you need to understand there was no federal government. they created this federal

government. the states had to buy into it and one of the area where is state said only buy into it if you protect our authority. and underscore our authority to determine what the election laws are. so when you have the pennsylvania supreme court or you have a con sent degree in georgia or a federal judge in michigan or things of that sort going on, interfering with decisions by, by the state legislatures that is unconstitutional and that should be raised and how many ballots does that affect? nobody knows. it could be hundreds and hundreds of thousands. now, as what's point of pointedy abc news some time ago let's talk about legal challenges you know why there's litigation going on and why this is taking so long. because the democrats and their surrogates of the biden campaign brought over 200 to 300 lawsuits. in the leadup to the election to change the voting systems in each state. and the trump campaign is trying

to address them now, confront them and deal with them because all of these cases that involve the democrats were intended to make fraud easier if not institutionalize it. and they write in abc news thanks to legal challenges from voting rights advocates. meaning left wing democrats and their party some states that typically require ballots to be received by polls closing time will now accept ballots postmarked by election day for the 2020 election. the pennsylvania supreme court said we doafnght care if there's a postmark. we don't care if there's a signature we don't care if signatures don't match that was a case brought really by the democrat governor who couldn't get these things from the republican legislature. so they went into court got it from democrats on the supreme court in the three blue all state the president won in 2016 they wrote. michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin, judges have recently issued rules that extend deadline from mail ballots to be extended judges the text the

constitution says that's unconstitution judges don't get to make that decision whether they're state judges or federal judges. that's a michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin. and michigan a court of claim judge the lowest judge there is in the state. ordered clerks to accept ballots that are post mac by november 2 and receive within 14 days of the election. that deadline for rules to be certified, these ballots have to be counted as provisional ballots legislature didn't pass that and republicans didn't agree to that in wisconsin a u.s. federal district judge ruled that ballot postmark by november third counted as long as received by november 9th. but legislature didn't do that in wisconsin. and in pennsylvania, these were all republican legislatures overruled by courts, by these voting advocates, democrats are bringing these cases. and in pennsylvania, not only will mail ballots that are postmarked on or before 8 p.m. on election day and received by 5 p.m. the friday after it be

counted due to a ruling from the state supreme court. any ballots that arrive within that time frame without a postmark. or with an unreadable postmark will be presumed top of sent before the cultoff point unless evidence indicates otherwise that is a violation of the federal constitution. state law did not provide for that. in minnesota -- ballot pose mark by election day received within a week after the election will be counted -- both massachusetts and kentucky allowing postmark ballots receive by november 6th to be counted in new jersey, those on and on changes taking place notice this i don't know of a single newsroom that put a chart on the monitor to show you all of the changes that occurred in the last year or so even in last 909 days. in these states -- by court order by decisions and secretaries of state or boards of elections to get around republican legislatures. this is a highly abusive and

controversial election across the country and georgia a federal judge ruled that ballot pose marked by election day will count. if election officials get them by the third day after the election, but the secretary of state the republican national committee joins a republican party are counting this order. but you have courts -- that are just stepping in and change the election laws. and this is, this is really quite shocking. trump campaign lawsuit in nevada, seeking to stop 9 state from mailing out ballots among other pursuits. nevada changed its mail-in procedures that they're mailing to the -- these election roles. 60 days before the election. 60 days and they put in ballot harvest. and did a very controversial way of checking signatures. that, of course, excluded any republican observer. and grok on in a new jersey and these other states so these are very serious matters so when you have politicians who are just out there saying, like romney romney has no idea what i'm

talking about hasn't looked at a single thing neither cases mr. constitution he's not mr. constitution. now what should happen in these states? what should have happened and should happen is that republican state legislatures in pennsylvania, in michigan other states georgia and so forth, they should have issued a resolution early on. stating that we under the federal constitution have an oath and have a duty to ensure that article 2 is upheld. that we make the election laws. not anybody else -- period. and that the election laws that were in place but changed by federal and state courts or by secretary of state or election board are null and void and all counts should be based on election laws that we put in place that were unconstitutional altered. any votes beyond that -- any votes beyond that are illegal and unconstitutional and if you're going cry about this

enfranchisement blame the democrat, courts people that did that. that's how you have a constitutional vote. that's why that matters. and i also fought the united states chief on the united states supreme court. john roberts chief justice. he could have killed this right away. several weeks ago -- when he should have voted with the others the other originallyists and so should have kavanaugh instead of letting pennsylvania get away with what it did what they should have ruled is for pennsylvania and for every other state the constitution is the constitution. article 2 leaving to legislature any changes -- done by any court, local state or federal done by any public official, governor, secretary of state, or members of any boards of election, are per se unconstitutional and alexis all kowngts will be based on the

federal constitution what the state legislature has passed if they had done this, almost none of this would be going on. almost none of this and those people that say -- biden won, let's get over it let's move along -- if you believe in the rule of law, if you believe in the constitution, if you believe in the nature of civil litigation that there needs to be discovery with dominion voting system eastern activities that took place where we literally have hundreds and hundreds of affidavits of fraud. if you believe in that system, then it shouldn't be cut short. otherwise entire integrity of your franchise is called into question and it will happen in 2022 and 2024. this isn't the republicans won't let biden be seated. this is the democrats have created chaos and anarchy. judges have created chaos and anarchy. and if we don't fix it now we'll never fix it. and joe biden better understand

that there cannot be unity and only be resistance if he doesn't join in the call to uphold constitution and rule of law to let civil procedures progress notice he hasn't said it once. not once. ♪ i'll be right back. ve strongly recommended to doctors to treat acute, non-low back muscle and joint pain with topical nsaids first. a formulation they recommend can be found in salonpas. a formulation they recommend can be found in salonpas. salonpas. it's good medicine. hisamitsu.

but when i started seeing things, i didn't know what was happening... so i kept it in. he started believing things that weren't true. i knew something was wrong... but i didn't say a word.

during the course of their disease around 50% of people with parkinson's may experience hallucinations or delusions. but now, doctors are prescribing nuplazid. the only fda approved medicine... proven to significantly reduce hallucinations and delusions related to parkinson's. don't take nuplazid if you are allergic to its ingredients. nuplazid can increase the risk of death in elderly people with dementia-related psychosis and is not for treating symptoms unrelated to parkinson's disease. nuplazid can cause changes in heart rhythm and should not be taken if you have certain abnormal heart rhythms or take other drugs that are known to cause changes in heart rhythm. tell your doctor about any changes in medicines you're taking. the most common side effects are swelling of the arms and legs and confusion. we spoke up and it made all the difference. ask your parkinson's specialist about nuplazid.

welcome back we have a great guest to most of you are familiar with but i can never hear enough of victor davis hanson knowledge of history and philosophy it is essential. victor davis hanson you heard what i had to say, you see there's a huge rush by the democrats, by the establishment republican and media by a lot of ignorance let's get this over with and go ahead joe biden how do you look at this? >> from what you did and i'm not a legal scholar like you are but historian and it is the constitution issue and constitution suggestion or doesn't suggest that and unless the congress shall intervene and they haven't in this case so they were laws they were clearly massage in some cases violated,

and they had a difference because when a close election a margins are very hip and those violations may or mat no i i think the inkeent cities inconsy point out real doubt about the election so that's the issue, and the left tries to say well we're -- we're two weeks and a half from the election we're three weeks from the electors whatever happens it's happened. and there are some on our side that had a press conference and i understand why they're concerned but they said, 70 you know 0% some of them have said trump won or millions of votes and so our critics focus on that argument. and not what you said -- because that argument then suggests this is the greatest scandal in the history of the united states at a magnitude we've never seen it may very well be but that's not your point your point is let's find out if it is or not you didn't say i have proof of 70% land slitted or it's a big land slide

that's why i wish people could concentrate on points you made what you're saying is here's the constitution. here's how even the people who violated it know that they violated it. and those violations have to be adjudicated because in a close election they may have altered result and we have evidence they might have altered results because we have these affidavits these inking the cities these unproven computers and this rush to have mail and early voting because of the covid lockdown. and so you're saying, take a deep breath, follow a constitution and i wish everybody on our side would stoic your argument. because what's happening in the krit rix coming in and saying -- you guys claim that it was a landslide where's the evidence that it was a land slide well we didn't say it maybe some people said that but we were sticking to the constitution. and the violations and ramifications so that's -- i think you're spot on and i -- i wish that people would caught

theiring arguments in king king consistency of what you said. >> troubling to me strategy of the democrats democrats who brought these lawsuits basically to so much up playing field. almost like a military operation, they brought in all of the after tell artillery hammer one court and one secretary of state after another it was, obviously, very well coordinated in network by mark one of their lawyers bob bauer one of their lawyers. who also been involved in test activities with respect to changing votes. and persuading courts and secretaries of state to change votes, and it is obvious they look at 2016 good davis hanson they said that can't happen again and they said we have to change the rules. and they changed the rules and maybe in a score of more states that particularly critical states. and they have a plan set out to do exactly this.

and in none of those cases where the changes intended to assist the republican. in none of these changes were intended to promote good government. none of these changes intended to ensure security of the vote quite the opposite. so i can understand and you can understand why people are really troubled by this. even apart from the constitution that i make -- and the litigation process that i talk about it is like wait a minute. what are they doing and even 2016 we knew the answer to who would be president at 2 a.m. in the morning now look at what's going on, right? >> it is worse than that because it is 2016, 2020, but we're looking at 2021 and georgia is the last redial mark, because the left has said that they're not interested in changing the policies as of as the mechanisms by which they make policies. and we have a heroic effort in the house, and we have a heroic effort to keep the senate and donald trump did a heroic effort

but the fact of the matter is, there's a good chance that our collective face will hinge on two seats if we lose those two seats they're not talking about -- oh. just nationalizing health care -- they're talking about getting rid of a 232-year electoral college with a national voting impact they're talking about changing 151 year of tradition with the supreme court. and they can do that if they get rid of the senate filibuster and then we're talking about the end of a 60-year tradition of 50 states. so once you have a 15-person supreme court, and we're within a hairs breath of getting that because we know what's going to happen you can have almost anything if you have the house and the presidency and the representatives and the supreme court, and the danger is that we, this could be a replay of what we just saw november third we know what's going to happen. polls are going to be massaging a incredible, new -- blue state, georgia. we're going to be told that

we're going to be told that warnock and moderate, that they're no dirchts than bill clinton third way, none of this radical stuff is pfer going make it. media is going to blanket it out big statistically going to deplatform whatever they have to do, and the money that we saw in particular states will be nothing compared to billion dollars that are come in from mike bloomberg and others and seen people diverse as andrew and columnst like tom friedman say violate the law and move into georgia. and then stay there temporarily register and then get out basically that was their implication which is a felony everything hangs in balance now no margin for error, an if we think that georgia is a traditional red state anymore, it has had enormous changes in demography through illegal and legal immigration, and it's tech center the suburban 6 million of

the 12 million people. and if question lose those two seats, i -- i don't think we'll you and i have never seen anything like the consequences in our lifetime. we're talking about structural changes to the constitution as we know it and to traditions and protocols of governess for over a century and a half. >> we'll be right back.

>> live from america news headquarterses i'm jon scott for

at least the next three weeks the san francisco 49ers are a team without a home. as the coronavirus continues to surge across the country, new restrictions are being enforced and santa clara county home of the 49ers football team now effectivelien baa all contact sports includings professional football. the news comes as the virus continues to surge and as the nfl grapples with a rising case count. and president trump rushing to complete as much of the border wall as possible before his time in the white house comes to an end. president-elect joe biden has said he hopes to stop construction along the southern border. arizona has become the center of the effort with construction crews working around the clock. i'm jon scott you can catch me tomorrow 6 p.m. eastern for the "fox report," now back to "life, liberty & levin." ♪ welcome back davis hanson

democrat party seems to stand opposite of so many things that we stand for our principles, our traditions. whether you look at our economic system and so many ways they reject capitalism. when you look at our immigration system and so many ways they reject the old immigration system where people have to show loyalty to our culture and to our country. they as you pointed out earlier they rejected the institutions that are set up by the constitution. they seek to effectively burn down the supreme court in the united states senate. you can go one issue after another after another how did they get here? and what do they want to take us for crying out loud? >> part it have mark is there was an and and yent idea that left likes a quality of result mandated by the government rather than equality of opportunity we knew that. but what enenhance that idea in 21st century we have a perfect storm of globalization, brought in enormous amounts of wealth

and 7 billion people in the world and concentrated on the two coasts that's where the universities are that's where silicon valley is that's where wall street banking and we created this new elite this international elite and at the same time, we all agree with nothing is better than legal immigration. and enriffs us but we have 50 million people not born in the united states that tax ability of the melting pot especially when some of them are here illegally to assimilate them and finally, our means of communication our dominated by about 20 square miles and silicon valley whether it is social media, twitter, facebook, the order of a google search, and you put all of that together, and it enhances this and yent idea that we're going mandate equality and they don't have popular support that's why they don't run as progressives or hard leftist joe biden didn't run as one. they tried to hide that. these candidates in georgia won't do that but they have the result mark is think about it. they have social media

entertainment, hollywood, professional sports, the media, academic k-12 the bureaucracy administrative state so all we have is -- talk radio and people and few other avenues on the internet. so this is asymmetrical change right now and never seen such power concentrated in such venues all in pursuit of an idea that we're going to be equal one way or another on the back end and by people who have no intention of being equal themselves none of their ideas are going to apply to them and never going to be subject to ramification of their legaltarian philosophy they're anointed they have exception for themselves as we saw with gavin newsom and nancy pelosi violating their own starngdz of quarantine. >> so frustrating to you as a historian to me as i study this -- history myself -- is this so predictable, and the

always talk about the people they always talk as if they're pop and whatever decisions they make and no matter you can look at the communist china, communist cuba you can look at iran, you can look at russia look wherever you want, they always destroy the people in the name of the people. and what's happening now is we're destroying the constitution in the name of the constitution. so we have a lot of work ahead of us that's why and i don't know if you agree with me that's why i say no don't give up on lit gigs on this election. we have got to take them on. we have got to confront them wherever we can, wherever they are and then we have to learn how to go on offense for our liberty and our constitution otherwise we're going to be devoured like everything else are we not? >> no we are and the reason they don't like the constitution because it frames why we need a republican not a radical opinion of democracy and that's why we have two senators from each state mark that's why we have electoral college they believe that there were certain types of

rural living and agriculture that offered a check on urban high density states so that wyoming a lantern wyoming have something to say about eight million people how they lived in new york. even though it wasn't radically equal that whole system is under attack now because people don't want a republic anymore but they want a radical democracy people on any given day decide what's good for everybody without constitutional guidelines, and that's what i'm scared about. that they've rejected whole idea of a reconstitutional republic from the nature of the senate, to the number of senators, electoral college, to all of that. >> yeah. the mob so we really don't need a bill of rights i guess because it protects us from the government, really from the mob. we'll be right back. now, it's our time.

time to get away to a place where we can finally be free. free from boundaries... ...limitations. even virtual backgrounds. today, we break free. ready to break free? plan your future getaway with norwegian cruise line. sail safe. feel free.

mark: victor davis hanson, is my position as somebody working the reagan administration, again i've studied history rather extensively, you are a scholar in it. the donald trump should be considered and certainly will be considered among the great presidents. i don't mean the left wing historian on university and college campuses. or those that our guest on msnbc and writing speeches for joe biden aisle talking about when really a sob or look at what this man did and has done and continue to do and what he did in four year period whether it is vaccine and other things, under enormous attack, i mean, people wanting to go to prison that he's going to be viewed as exceptional president do you agree with me? >> i do i am a trying to be entire empirical despite the fact that i voted for him twice china the whole relationship with china is recalibrated left

joining with the right saying this can't go on they're not -- destine to rule the world. just because they have 1.4 billion people we are not going to let that happen. whether the left says it is now or hong kong or the right says that this is a corruption of the world mercantile system. donald trump did that he took the middle east he completely redefined it whatever once plel party is saying. it is a more secure, more proamerican more prowestern and more stable society iran is losing, losing losing now they were ascended until donald trump came this and we are largest gas and ol producer in the world that's given us enormous freedom in middle east. it is nullified power of russia terrified china given a boost to interior america, and then most important republican party he said we're not gong to be caricature as the golfing class which the left used to do. we are a worker middle class

party upper middle class middle class lower middle class, and the interior the united states is not done for. it is not deindustrialized not a russian belt we have cheap energy good workers we have good infrastructure, we have little less transportation cost. we can make america great again. that was a wonderful thick to tg to do finally he said you know what legal immigration great but you can't have a state without borders. you can't have a nation without security. and everybody said that was impossible and he built a wall got mexico to cooperate with us. mexico was tweal guarding portions of the border and the result is that he restored the idea at least for now that the melting pot is something that we should cherish we want to integrate and we want to simulate and inner merry it is distinctal not essential to who we are but record numbers of african-americans to vote for republicans. so across the board, if you just

tune out what the left says and never trump rigs and just look at the record, it is astounding and four years mark i'm not going comment on judges but you know that better than i do. his appointments have been stellar they've been numerous and they're going to have a lasting legacy. >> look at this virus, the attacks on him have been grotesque. despite what some of these governors did to harm their own population an president had no control over that. he, it was obvious to him mask are fine social distancing fine. shut downs are not fine -- causing other kinds of maladies to people are not fine we need to address this we need to fix this. and so here come this is businessman he says all right i want therapeutic and vaccine and cut the red tape i'm going to swing the whip we're going to do this as fast as we can without cutting out health and safety features we want this included and done by the end of the year he says he's gong to do it he's

mocked attack there's experts that say it is impossible. he's undermined by bureaucrats within his own administration fauci said it couldn't happen until january 2021 that's aggressive ten months in we're going to have two vaccines -- they're going to already under production. the needles and already under production. the transportations and distributions already been figured out -- i don't think we've ever seen anything like this in american history take 30 i could seconds and explain. >> look at the record it takes four, five years for welcomes we've never had to get these vaccinations in we're told we're suffering singularly unlike europe look at deaths per million compared to u.k. or italy or spain we're better or i don't to use that word many this context but we're doing as well or better than europe. and then when you look at criticism of them from joe biden and look at it in detail it turns out that joe biden's covid strategy is pretty much copied from donald trump.

and he adds some to wear a mask all of the tile despite as you point out -- doctor fauci has been all over on the use of masks and all over on quarantine as is the w.h.o. so i jus look at what critics say they would have done and then i exam it carefully i can't see much difference other than they're emulating trump policy. >> in the end donald trump did something everybody said he continue do as a result he's going to save with the vaccine millions and millions of lives and get americans back to a normal routine. we'll be right back. ♪ things our own way. charted our own paths. i wasn't going to just back down from moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. psoriatic arthritis wasn't going to change who i am. when i learned that my joint pain could mean permanent joint damage, i asked about enbrel. enbrel helps relieve joint pain, and helps stop permanent joint damage. plus enbrel helps skin get clearer in psoriatic arthritis. ask your doctor about enbrel, so you can get back

to your true self. -play ball! enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal events including infections, tuberculosis, lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been someplace where fungal infections are common. or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if you have persistent fever, bruising, bleeding or paleness. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. visit enbrel.com to see how your joint damage could progress. enbrel. eligible patients may pay as little as $5 per month.

♪ mark: victor davis hanson where do you see this country in the next two or three years? >> a lot depends on adjudication on this presidential election and more importantly georgia senate election let's say for purpose of argument, that the supreme court due to packing and a democratic majority and the senate and in the house along with the democratic presidency, i think we have a very rough two years and by that i mean i think the middle east stability will be radically endangered i think we'll have a with china and social legislation that we saw in the democratic primary that

by the way had no support that will become part of our new normal. but i'm confident mark, because i think with becomes nemesis in the 2022 mid-materials we're going see thing like 2010, the correction to obama, i think the senate if we can hold it we'll get even bigger margin if we don't hold it this time we will win it i think we're sitting the stage for a return of the trump agenda and i mean that that i don't see pus going back to romneyism or -- john mccainism, but we have a new republican party and it is inclusive, it's populist proud of american tradition and confident upbeat wait people from all walks of life as we saw with these house candidates that want to participate. so i'm pretty confident about the long-term future of the country. and we have the best universities and science and math we have a biggest agricultural exporter in the

world biggest fuel producer in the world. most stable constitution, but we've got all of these natural vast military so i think we're suffering from a crisis of confidence but i think in 2022 we're going to see sort of a reaffirmation what have we've been talking about today. >> i also think that thank god forb.i.d. in joe biden is the president he'll do everything he can to one up franklin roosevelt i really believe that i think he wants to be a historic figure despite who he actually is. that they're going ram through as much legislation favorite majority or through executive orders they possibly can regardless of the consequence on people and victor davis hanson i think some of the people who will be hurt the most are some of the people who voted for joe biden. some of the union members some people in the suburbs and so forth. because joe biden is going to put his foot on the gas peddle kamala harris will, and he's going to have i think a fairly radical cabinet republicans have already kind of hinted whoever he wants in cabinet he'll get in

the cabinet because republicans don't fight like democrats no investigation, there will be no special counsel. the media will protect him they'll the guard -- so we have a huge fight on our hands but what i hear you saying is, don't give up hope. we still have our constitutions. or what's left of them and we need to continue to fight in our own way whether it is grassroots movement or litigation, whether it is our politicians doing the right thing. don't give up. and keep fighting. 30 seconds final words. >> absolutely. and we have to appeal to the american people not to change the rules or manner in which we make policies don't let a democratic presidency or supreme court or congress change voting and override state legislatures which i think will keep the electoral college. keep in mind person court and senate filibuster keep the institutions and let's agree and disagree on how we change power but don't change this system.

because you can't win at it that's what is frightening i think american people unction that. we have a great system or for 233 years we don't have to change it let's keep it for another 233 years as it is. mark: all right victor davis hanson thank you god bless you keep at it my friend. thank you. >> thank you. ..

dusters extends to 6 feet to reach way up high... to grab, trap and lock away gross dust. nice! for dust on my floors, i switch to sweeper. the heavy duty cloths reach deep in grooves to grab, trap and lock dust bunnies... no matter where they hide. no more heebie jeebies. phhhhew. glad i stopped cleaning and started swiffering.

mark: welcome back. those of us who believe in liberty, the constitution, faith. >faith and family. we have always been the resistance. they have all kinds of abstract ideas they want to impose on us. they don't view us as individuals. you can't travel on thanksgiving? what's the big deal? and all of our subjects have to walk around with masks.

that's their mentality. those of us who believe in liberty, we'll always be the resistance and emgrace the constitution which they do not i will say this as clearly as i know how. the democratic party today is more dangerous to this country than of any tour foreign enemies. they seek power to destroy our constitutional system, our economic system, and our way of life. this isn't just a policy or political debate. it's and substantive debate that goats core of how you want to live. i have no intention of uniting around a party that wants to destroy what i love. i have anyone tension of you fighting in with a party that views us with disdain. we are americans, we are red

blooded yanks. we are not going anywhere. this our country, too. we reviert and we are going to keep it. period. [♪] jesse: welcome to "watters' world." i'm jesse watters. ' 2020 has been a crazy year. i know many of you are wishing this year away. but before we do, let's take a trip down memory lane. we had some great interviews in 2020 i will share some of my favorites with you. oliver stone stepped into "watters' world" this year.