tv The Five FOX News December 2, 2020 2:00pm-3:00pm PST
2:00 pm
with the virus, chuck grassley, senator will be talking to us for the first time since getting diagnosed, he's doing just fine. on fox business, we will see you then. ♪ >> jesse: hello, everybody. i'm jesse watters along with dagen mcdowell, juan williams, sandra smith and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five." ♪ president trump releasing a brand-new video statement amid new claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election. watch. >> the constitutional process must be allowed to continue, we are going to defend the honesty of the vote by ensuring that every legal ballot is counted. and that no illegal ballot is counted. >> jesse: the president's new
2:01 pm
comments, coming as post office whistle-blowers save thousands of mail-in ballots were either tampered with or thrown out entirely in key swing states. watch this. it's big i can tell you i saw 24 pallets, i picked them up in new york and drove them to harrisburg and from harrisburg i drove to lancaster. >> i had no ballots to take on election day, the day after the election i didn't really think anything of it until the postal service supervisor asked me if i had forgotten ballots of the night before. and i didn't have any so i was like, that's kind of a weird question, no. and he explained to me that 100,000 ballots were supposedly missing in the state of wisconsin. >> jesse: during a hearing in michigan, do people watchers claimed they were bullied. take a look at this. beco any time as a challenger i tried to look at the ballot, two or three of the poll workers
2:02 pm
literally screaming at me to get back 6 feet. >> these people were like professional agitators whose job it was to sow discord among g.o.p. workers trying to do their job. he said something to the effect of "i will kick you out of here." >> the ballot had a straight party ticket vote for both democrat and republican. though a poll worker said "i want to give it to the democrats," that is absurd, that is illegal. >> jesse: some very sad news to announce. because of her salty language, she's been suspended indefinitely and she will put her entire week's salary in the square jar. all right. hi, sandra. greg gutfeld, you've seen some of these witness statements about what they've seen and heard. what are your reactions to that? >> greg: you know some people are going to believe everything you just said. you're going to get a phone call. i'm not surprised by this.
2:03 pm
i look, i watched the eyewitness testimony and i'm thinking, everybody keeps using the word "baseless." they go, oh, it's baseball. it's basement-full. think about every violation of civil discourse in civil society that has occurred this year, has been defended by the democratic party, okay? riots were recast as mostly peaceful, looting was seen by a legitimate protest by the atlantic, speaking truth to power, defunding the police was championed until of course they thought that might cost them elections so they backed off. voter intimidation fits together in this behavioral pattern, the democratic party will seize power by any means necessary and that means threat of violence or intimidation and if we don't call them out on this, which is what we're doing now, it's going to continue. why were statues torn down? they knew they could get away
2:04 pm
with it. why was private property destroyed? they knew they could get away with it. they created the idea that lawlessness was acceptable in the face of alleged moral evil. that trump was such a monster and his supporters were so evil that anything, it's not just acceptable, it's encouraged to bully and intimidate people and if this calls into question a lot of these cities, if this was happening in these cities we have to look very closely, this was a four-year moral crusade to make it acceptable to abuse an entire group of people because they didn't agree with you. i think the idea, you don't even need widespread fraud, all you need is a little bit of it in these specific cities and you can turn an election. >> juan: let me jump in here. >> jesse: i have a specific question. >> juan: you should go, go ahead. >> sandra: that was nice. >> jesse: we are so nice sometimes. you heard this guy, jesse morgan
2:05 pm
is his name and he made a pretty specific allegation, he was a postal service contractor who drove at least 300,000 mail ballots from long island, new york, to pennsylvania, then was fooled around with and told to go and park his truck in a place he'd never done before and he wakes up the next morning and the rig has been stolen. what is your reaction to something like that? do you think that's a big live? do you think that guy is lying? >> juan: i have no idea. >> jesse: aren't you curious? you're not curious about that? >> juan: if there is substance to what he's saying i'm certain that republican trump officials will take it to court and let the courts decide. >> jesse: i'm glad you said that. >> juan: i want to respond to what greg was saying, this was democrats and this has to do somehow with things that happened in the past and i'm singing to myself, is bill barr a democrat now? is he to be treated as not part of the republican party? >> sandra: what did bill barr
2:06 pm
say? >> juan: bill barr said there is no evidence of such substance and magnitude that it would overturn the election. that's the key point. let me finish. that's exactly what he said. let me finish, will you, please? you are misrepresenting what you are talking about. let me tell you, here are republicans. republican judges, republican judges throughout every one of these lawsuits. "the wall street journal" says trump is diminishing his own legacy by alleging fraud that he cannot prove, republican governments, republican governor in arizona, the republican head of cybersecurity all said this election was without -- >> greg: address the witness'
2:07 pm
fates be to hear something else that really bothers me. you have a republican, republican election official in georgia, dave sterling with the support of the georgia secretary of state saying the president of the united states must stop inspiring people to commit violence, people could get hurt. >> jesse: you are just reading things republican said. >> juan: this was democrats who were not acknowledging -- >> greg: i'm talking about democrats at the polling stati station. >> juan: democrats this, democrats that. >> greg: you totally avoided that point, you cannot deny the witnesses. >> juan: i cannot deny, "the wall street journal" -- >> jesse: dagen, jump in, please. >> dagen: why shouldn't these whistle-blowers be listened to? okay, where is the left-wing media in all this? they have, there is an
2:08 pm
aggressive lack of curiosity about these whistle-blowers and what they have to say. under the trump administration, whistle-blower comes out of the works, we've got to get him on, the whistle-blowers, pointed the finger at the trump administration, they were sacrosanct whenever they said it was unimpeachable. these people were literally putting themselves, their careers on the line by a coming out and saying, i saw malfeasance or i saw something that just looked bad and it smelled bad. they are willing to do it publicly, willing to do it, willing to swear to what they witnessed and i just want to know, if this is the new era of mail-in voting and mail invalidating, and it's going to happen, in this size and volume, why don't the democrats want to get to the bottom of isolated cases of intimidation or fraud
2:09 pm
or mishandling of ballots? why don't they want to get to the bottom of it? the left and the democrats think it's always going to work in their favor, that's what's going on. that's really discussing. >> juan: do you think the news division of fox news isn't interested in every one of these? you think "the washington post" and "new york times," "wall street journal" have no interest in any of these? course they do. >> sandra: it's an important discrepancy when you keep referencing back to bill barr, he did not say the investigation is over, nothing has been concluded yet says the doj. it seems that some who want to believe that the investigation is over believe that but what he's saying is, kayleigh mcenany said that in the briefing today, what is come over his desk so far he has not been able to conclude. he makes an important distinction, to your point about systemic allegations versus circumstantial allegations.
2:10 pm
how far do republicans want the doj to dig into some of these individual allegations, is that what they are therefore? >> jesse: that's what they should be therefor because there is a woman in wayne county who witnessed people in these count rooms for 27 hours xeroxing and re-scanning ballots for joe biden over and over again and she said the next day she called the fbi, spent 40 minutes on the phone with the fbi person and never got a call back. so maybe that should be investigated. >> juan: yeah, like all this nonsense. how many of these cases have been dismissed as ridiculous? >> jesse: after you hear about three or four dozen -- >> juan: this is shameful. >> jesse: i think juan is nervous. if you won, don't be so nervous. coming up, joe biden is plagiarizing again and this time he is copying president trump's america first policies.
2:11 pm
2:12 pm
2:15 pm
is a good musical >> greg: after trashing donald trump for his evil america-first dance, joe biden assembled his brain trust and came up with something far better. america first. "i want to make sure we are going to fight by investing in america first. i'm not going to enter any new trade agreements with anybody until we have made major investments here at home and in our workers. well, you know, i'm old enough to remember when joe felt differently. >> america first has made
2:16 pm
america alone under the trump administration, our alliances are in jeopardy, we are more isolated in the world than we've ever been and our allies, america first has made america alone. president trump has changed the landscape, it's become america first which is been america alone. >> greg: i also remember the day after the travel ban when biden tweeted this. "we need to lead the way with science, not donald trump's record of xenophobia and fearmongering. then what does he do? fax the travel ban three months late. if trump did it it's evil, until joe slowly realizes it's not and then steals it. he will take the travel ban, the pro-fracking policy, the vaccines, those tariffs on china and joe is preaching unity now, a trump rallying cry after joe himself branded half of america
2:17 pm
racist and now it's america first. joe suffers from the hate trump but love his ideas disorder. joe will see what trump has done and think, i can't do better and he's right so joe's first term might in fact be trump's second at anything the press condemned the orange godzilla four will become awesome under mighty joe biden. joe should invent a slogan for this. how about "make america great again," it has a nice ring to it. this is going to be, if it happens and joe ends up being inaugurated it's going to be trump two without the tweets. >> jesse: i like it, he's good at stealing things, slogans, elections, i'm just kidding, juan. >> juan: thank you. >> jesse: he also plagiarized his "build back better," he took
2:18 pm
that from the united nations. i'm going to be honest, if he steals this i'm good with it and i am going to treat joe like i treated trump. fair and balanced. when he does something good for the country i'm going to applaud him. when he does something detrimental i'm going to savagely attack him and people will marvel about how fair i cover joe biden and if they call me a hypocrite if i did something with trump i didn't do with biden i will just with the way my way out of it with some reasonable explanation. but in all seriousness, the made in america think he's got on his web site sounds exactly like trump's plan, it sounds great, reinvent manufacturing and not do these new lopsided trade deals and they are going to buy america first, all that stuff so let's see what happens. >> greg: what are you going to do if he does something that trump did? are you going to say that's terrible are you going to suddenly like it? >> juan: that's what i was going to make jesse's point, that if you guys are really
2:19 pm
saying oh, this is minute, you like what trump was doing so maybe you should like what biden is doing. in fact i thought you confuse things, clearly what you heard from biden was biden talking about military alliances, our involvement in climate deals, all of that. clearly trump closed back and left the rest of the world, our allies left them. look, my point is, biden won the election, trump lost, the american people rejected trump and that's the bottom line here and if you really want to think about it i would say that, you know, if you really think about america first i think it was trump who didn't follow through because we saw billions in contracts go overseas during the trump administration. >> jesse: we saw a lot of manufacturing jobs come back. >> sandra: we became a net oil exporter under the trump administration in one of the first things he says he's going to address when he rattles off this "new york times" interview,
2:20 pm
i was going to refute president trump's policies as energies and maybe that's an area where he's going to make some unwanted changes, when you saw the american worker and american consumer greatly benefit from that energy independence. >> juan: i think what you have to factor in here is the environment and i think lots of people are and in fact also -- >> dagen: our emissions per capita for this country are the lowest they've been since 1950, just broadly speaking they are the lowest they've been since the early '90s. you know when you don't put america first? when you rejoin the paris accord which puts us, hurts america and the united states and actually let's china, the biggest co2 emitter kicked ten years down the road before they have to do anything. you know it doesn't put america first? raising corporate taxes because if you raise corporate taxes in this country which joe biden
2:21 pm
promised to do about where the taxes are in china? it encourages those corporations to move those jobs overseas. or build factories overseas because there's a lower tax rate there. they can move their headquarters over there and you know you really screw rural americans who joe biden was talking about? raise their gasoline prices, raise their electricity prices and take away their jobs in the energy sector. i just want joe biden to say "china virus." if he's going to borrow you know what from president trump, say "china plague" because that's why 271,000 americans are dead and why a million and a half people around the world are dead because that virus came from china and they lied about it and unleashed a pandemic on the world and he's been blaming trump. shame on him. >> greg: i hate it when she doesn't arrive geared up for the show.
2:22 pm
2:26 pm
♪ >> sandra: a bar owner in new york city getting hauled away in handcuffs after defying covid rules and declaring his business and autonomous zone. danny presti speaking out. >> we followed everything that their science, everything, the governor, mayor's orders since march, just kept going, kept going, literally stripped down to nothing. small businesses, we were crippled down to almost nothing. >> sandra: meanwhile, more democrats accused of hypocrisy
2:27 pm
over violating covid guidelines, the san francisco mayor reportedly attended a dinner party at the upscale restaurant french laundry the day after california governor gavin newsom was there for a party. days later, she banned all indoor dining in san francisco. the mayor of austin, texas, just got busted for making this video, telling people to stay at home while he was vacationing in mexico. why do these stories continue? politicians flouting their own guidelines. >> these guys are hypocrites and they should be called out for it. to my mind this is bad actions by politicians because people follow examples and that's not good but i'd rather have bad acting politicians than bad policies that hurt people and the policies are the right policies, the policies are good. >> sandra: why don't they follow them? >> juan: i think that they should but i think elites
2:28 pm
sometimes have their own perspective. the real person that's hurting people if you want to know who's politicians are having an adverse effect is mitch mcconnell right now blocking any kind of congressional reli relief. >> sandra: this is really something, that facebook video message posted november 9th, 2 days after his daughter's wedding, he said on there, we need to stay home if you can, keep the numbers now, now is not the time to relax. he has since confirmed that he made that video and delivered that message while he was on vacation in mexico with eight people. >> jesse: now is not the time to relax with a rum runner in your hand and spf 15 slathered all over your fat chest. this guy is disgusting. he should stay in mexico, we shouldn't let them back in.
2:29 pm
you can lose business but you can't open a business, this was only supposed to be temporary, these lock downs, even the w.h.o. says lockdowns are having a bad idea. i just looked at the hospital capacity here in manhattan. what are they doing? they are basically shutting down small businesses and the politicians aren't sending the stimulus checks and now you have the autonomous zone out in seattle and the other autonomous zone out here, two liberal cities. one was pro-business and one was anti-police stand they get treated actually different. one gets shut down until after 24 hours, they had murders, assaults, businesses being shaken down, they had vandalism on this one, a couple people got
2:30 pm
drunk. they are people got, here people took a few shots. it's sick. >> sandra: how can they continue to survive with these restrictions? >> greg: the thing is, we said this at the beginning nine months ago when it started that our job is to give opinions but we almost have no skin in this game because we are not giving up any work, we are on tv. we aren't going to give up our salaries and lose our medical insurance and move back home, that's what's happening to these people that own bars, the waitresses and the small businesses, they aren't going to be bailed out like the looters were after the riots, you had politicians bailing out looters but they are not bailing out these guys so it's easy for people to say, they've got to follow the rules when we are on tv. we've got to stop listening to the politicians and start listening to the people, listen to them and what they believe is right because generally right
2:31 pm
now they've been told a lot of stuff that isn't true. their livelihoods and careers are being destroyed. >> dagen: why is it okay, people can go into a bar a few streets down in staten island. i expect politicians to be hypocritical but i really am stunned by their level of idiocy because there is now a hopelessness among these bar and restaurant owners and a desperation where you see something like this with the bar in staten island, nothing to lose and everything to lose at the same time. if there's one thing i've repeated all year, i am grateful to have a job, i am lucky to have a job, i don't really know what they are going through, and to correct you on something, wand, mitch mcconnell and the senate republicans tried to move forward on a half a trillion
2:32 pm
dollar stimulus package twice and twice the democrats in the senate voted to not even start debate on it. there is 135, $140 billion in leftover money from the paycheck protection program that just needs to simply be reallocated by nancy pelosi. where is that money? it is nowhere. there is half a trillion dollars in money that is unspent from the spring package that needs to be reallocated. >> juan: you can keep shouting but you can't refute that the democrats have had a bill on the table. they have passed it out, bipartisan, republicans, republicans and democrats put forward yesterday a bipartisan proposal less than what the president -- >> sandra: we can all agree, there are millions of americans. >> juan: i can agree on that,
2:33 pm
2:37 pm
♪ >> juan: welcome back, former president obama weighing in on a major rift in the democratic party but did he just make it worse? top democrats think slogans like "defund the police" cost them seats and the former president seems to agree. >> i guess you could use a snappy slogan but you know you lost a big audience a minute you say it which makes it a lot less likely that you're going to get the changes you want done. the key is deciding, do you want to get something done or do you want to feel good among the people you already agree with. >> juan: but now members of the so-called squad hitting back
2:38 pm
at obama. ilhan omar saying "defund the police is not a slogan but a policy demand." alexandria ocasio-cortez argues that using polite language doesn't work and the whole point of protesting is to make people uncomfortable. jesse, thinking about the idea of democrats in disarray when obama is saying it, biden, bernie sanders, aoc agree on raising wages for american workers, taking action on climate change, obama said aoc should have more time speaking at the convention, that doesn't sound like disarray. >> jesse: nice try trying to patch thing up. i hope barack obama goes off on omar on twitter donald trump style, i would love to see that kind of thing happen but he's too polite. think about it, he watched all summer people ride it, defund the police, two dozen cities,
2:39 pm
watch the whole streets get destroyed, everything was on fire, he didn't say anything until his book came out. he waited until now to sail, that defund the police thing? probably not a good idea. after the democrats lost house seat after house seat, businesses got burned, the whole country was torn to pieces. he waited until then to sell a book to say it. thanks, a little late. >> juan: yeah, the whole country got torn to pieces. >> jesse: have you seen the damage? look at minneapolis. crime has skyrocketed. >> juan: senator manchin says there's not one democratic center that supports the idea but isn't it true that the majority of americans across political lines agree that police reform is needed? >> dagen: there's a difference between reforming a police department locally and basically withdrawing funds away from a police department.
2:40 pm
>> juan: that hasn't happened anywhere. >> jesse: philadelphia, minneapolis, portland, oregon. >> juan: they've taken all the money away from the police. no more police in philadelphia. that is the news, no police in philadelphia. >> jesse: look it up. >> dagen: i think women know that if there is an issue of domestic violence or somebody breaks into your house you are not calling a social worker took him go after the perp. that being said, house majority whip came out against this slogan, congressman karen bass also said it's one of the worst slogans that she had ever heard. i just want somebody in the democratic party with some stones to step up and tell some of these people to just sit down and piped down and pump their breaks. i suspect it's a woman. not president obama obviously but there is a difference between a senator and congressman. i think people maybe need to
2:41 pm
leave lay that out. >> sandra: isn't former president obama asking a rather serious question, are you putting a slogan like "defund the police out there in an effort to get something done? or, to his point, is it to feel good among people you already agree with? i think it's a fair question. he didn't make any friends, it wasn't just ilhan omar and aoc who shot back, incoming congresswoman fought back, double down on the message but to your point, he went further, took on socialism, another where the squad likes to use and throw around, a loaded term so he has a book out but there might be a bigger message there to the younger crowd of the party. >> juan: let's talk about that because i think this strikes me as another example of people on the right elevating a so-called squad, a group that actually has very little power but they like to use them as a target when you have, you just said, from karen
2:42 pm
bass to barack obama, they all say this is not about actually defunding, it's about police reform. >> greg: what i think it is is it's about using language as a device for camouflage. barack obama didn't say defunding the police was wrong, he saying you need a better disguise for it. the left has always been a master of disguising terrible ideas. obamacare, for example, you're not going to lose your doctor, your premiums are going to go down, both were lies. they redefined speech is harmful and actions as speech so do your point, will somebody ever stand up to this? it usually has to be the antileft that stands up to the left because the people in their party are terrified of people in the squad so how does the left know when they've crossed the line in their own party? nobody said anything about the looting in their party, nobody said anything about police defunding in their party or the mob tactics, the voter intimidation. the only time they ever stop and
2:43 pm
police themselves is when they are soundly humiliated by the heroes in the media. >> sandra: oh oh, my god. >> juan: is that right? i was going to ask you, it seems to me, democrats just won the white house, retained control of the house, they may get control of the senate. that doesn't sound like a party in disarray. >> sandra: i think it's interesting to hear former president barack obama to offer aoc, he says, get some new blood, give her a platform, keep her happy. >> greg: keep her busy, maybe she should go in the kitchen. >> juan: all right, we are going to stop. up next, comedian sarah silverman says she can get away with offensive jokes because of her liberal politics. next for you on "the five." ♪
2:44 pm
good morning, mr. sun. good morning, blair. [ chuckles ] whoo. i'm gonna grow big and strong. yes, you are. i'm gonna get this place all clean. i'll give you a hand. and i'm gonna put lisa on crutches! wait, what? said she's gonna need crutches. she fell pretty hard. you might want to clean that up, girl. excuse us. when owning a small business gets real, progressive helps protect what you built with customizable coverage. -and i'm gonna -- -eh, eh, eh. -donny, no. -oh.
2:47 pm
2:48 pm
anything, we can say the words that are unsalable, you know i don't mean it so i can say it, there is kind of like liberal [bleep] about it in retrospect, i don't know, it's a weird balance. >> dagen: this is one of those segments were i just want to hear what you have to say, let it rip. >> greg: it boils down to this, she can use the n-word because she's a liberal, she can wear black face because she's a liberal. she's also saying in a way and it's true that liberals have more freedom of speech than other people do because you assume their intentions are in the right place. at her and i were to say the same joke, my intentions would be bad but her intentions would be good so her solution is into that everybody has the same freedom of speech which is all freedom, hers is basically, let's just roll it all back because i realized i was wrong in the past and we can just limit everybody's freedom of speech so i don't know. i think, i support whatever she says, i don't care what she
2:49 pm
says, 100%. the thing is she should actually, like, it can't just be her good intentions behind everything, everybody tries to have good intentions when they make jokes, maybe she should assume the people she doesn't like also have good intentions and not just assume because they are politically different that they have evil or dark ideas behind their jokes. >> dagen: in this podcast, i found this astonishing, will arnett was one of the hosts of the podcasts i'm a currently residing in a where are they now file, he blames essentially conservatives for them not being able to make jokes. he says this. "what's been going on is things about so serious because everybody who is not liberal is so serious and so dark and so real about their negativity or hate or racism that it's taken all of that away." that essentially he can't make jokes because, well, conservatives have no sense of humor.
2:50 pm
>> jesse: i think i'm pretty funny but half the time i'm not even trying to be funny and that's a whole other issue. humor and ridicule and mockery politically are very effective. remember what jon stewart did for so many years, the way he really went after all of these republican politicians with the clips and the mockery, that was really effective and that turned a lot of people onto that type of humor and made caricatures out of some republicans. if republicans do that to democrats, can't do that, that's too effective and that can really hit home too hard so they have to put up a bunch of walls so we can't say anything. >> dagen: wan? >> juan: i think of free speech allows people to be offensive so i think that's obvious, the market place gets to decide what's acceptable or not, like if you cut off somebody's head, a liberal politician who was punished. comedians i think are judged on whether or not they are funny,
2:51 pm
not so much on whether they are offensive. you've got to be funny first and foremost. in order to really be effective. you look at i think comedians across the line, this is where liberal and conservatives, politicians, comedians agree they don't like politically correct speech, people say they can't go on the campus and do a comedy routine. i don't think this is political. >> sandra: she says "i've said a lot of problematic things, looking back. but such as comedy, it's not evergreen." the famous episode the other day, or incident, why all the swearing? she drops how many squares in that one attempted, why? >> greg: are you trying to take dana's seat? she's not here. >> sandra: is it a necessary function for comedians? >> greg: it is for me. swearing takes the place of putting your fist through a
2:52 pm
window. you swear and it's a release a little bit but you don't need to do it all the time. >> juan: comedians can do it, i don't know about commentators. >> greg: why do comedians have more speech than everybody else? they shouldn't. >> juan: part of their act is pushing the socially acceptable line and language. >> jesse: when i push lines that's not the reaction we get. >> juan: okay, all right. >> dagen: i've been in this business for 20 years and i've never said french on the air. >> jesse: that's not true. >> dagen: i've never said french. i want to end with this, nothing should be off limits when it comes to humor and i'm grateful for dave chappelle, what he did and that netflix special turned it around for everybody. "one more thing" up next. ♪ research shows people remember commercials with nostalgia. so to help you remember that liberty mutual customizes your home insurance,
2:53 pm
here's one that'll really take you back. wow! what'd you get, ryan? it's customized home insurance from liberty mutual! what does it do bud? it customizes our home insurance so we only pay for what we need! and what did you get, mike? i got a bike. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
2:54 pm
and i'm still going for my best. even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'm on top of that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. what's next? getting out there. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve
2:55 pm
or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. ask your doctor about eliquis. and if your ability to afford your medication has changed, we want to help.
2:57 pm
thing." so my producer mike lamarck i finally came to his senses. and proposed to his girlfriend. there they are in the poconos by a babbling brook. he did get on his knee and she said yes after a little hesitation. but she said yes. >> yeah! >> they've been dating for a year officially. it's the anniversary of their six-year meeting. she is actually a game show producer working on shows like $100,000 pyramid and "who wants to be a millionaire?" it's safe to say mary and mike want to make you a millionaire, but it will make you very happy. >> absolutely. >> good luck, congratulations.
2:58 pm
>> did michael get wet knees there? [laughter] >> they were not wearing masks. [laughter] i think we have to have a meeting tomorrow to discuss his future. 6 feet. i don't want people seeing that kind of lackluster activity here on the "the five." >> you are going to love this one. if you are like me you get super excited when the mailman comes. i can hardly wait. just like this little fella here. check amount. him out. [laughter] >> explained that to the irs. >> my dog ate my... >> i love it. >> those are trump ballots. call bill barr. spotify the music up announced
2:59 pm
2020s most streamed artists. take a look at the winners -- drake, juice world, the weekend. i got to wondering, what are my colleagues listening to? greg's was housing luxury energy by trevor dunn. jesse's was "someone loved you." >> that's right that's right. >> my top five... my top five included the marvin gaye, tammy terrel, i want you to know -- can you guess who my top artists of last year was? of course, the winner was sam cooke. >> love it. sandra. >> sandra: put the bride and groom on the screen. as goes 2020, she got married from the window. congratulations to lauren and patrick delgado. and for you, i have a joey and the kangaroo sanctuary in august
3:00 pm
springs australia. taking his very first steps. to follow them on instagram, you won't regret it. >> that's okay. so cute. the special report is up next. >> bret: hey, jesse. animals are great. thanks. ♪ >> this may be the most important speech i have ever made. this is not just about honoring the votes of 74 million americans who voted for me, it is about ensuring that americans can have faith in this election and in all future elections. >> bret: that is a portion of a video released by the white house a two nights ago. president trump lays out his case insisting he will continue to challenge last months election results and gives his strongest education yet that he does in fact planned to run again in 202if
256 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on