jason miller. thank you. good to have you here tonight. so that is the story of tuesday, december the 8th, 2020. but "the story" continues and we will be here to take you through it. tomorrow night at 7:00. we will see you then. good night. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. the defining cashistic of our ruling class in this country is narcissism. the people in charge talk almost exclusively about themselves, about their limitless neurosis, their privilege, their guilt about that privilege, their identity. no matter what they're saying, it's almost always about them. if you listen to our strictly moderated national conversation, you would think the single greatest crisis this country faces is the passing of a convicted felon from minneapolis

called george floyd. that's our main challenge. literally told us that for months. so america's frame of reference has shrunk to the point where we can only fear ourselves. the rest of the world knows that. they've been watching carefully, especially china. china knows that our self-involvement is their opportunity. while our leaders have been busy lecturing us, the chinese government has remained deadly serious. chinese leaders aren't frivolous and stupid like our leaders are. they don't care what protphoupbs you use. they don't hire people because of the way they look. they have a goal, a very specific goal. they're highly focused on it. that goal is knocking us from our perch. that goal is winning. and they are. over the past decade, china has made stunning progress. attempt to dethrone the united states from its global position of leadership.

china's economy will soon surpass our in size. at some point, so will its military strength. to accelerate this, the chinese communist party has engaged in a ceasely effort to subverse the people who run the united states. that has worked more tpbively than anyone imagined. last night we showed you proof. we played a clip of a chinese professor speaking on camera in front of a live audience explaining how deeply his country's intelligence services have penetrated our government and business establishments. this video was recorded just over a week ago. watch the subtitles at the bottom of the screen. we have people at the top, at the top of america's core inner circle of power and influence. of course, that means the

government. it means wall street. it also means the media and the tech company that distribute the media's product. that may be why you didn't hear anything about this video elsewhere on television today. cnn claims to be an international network. they ignored it. so did msnbc and the broadcast networks. so much for their purported concern about foreign interference in our democracy. when china interferes, it's not a story. they don't care. that may be why so many news out lets ignored another blockbuster story about china, one that broke today. to their great credit a pair of reporters doggedly spent the last year investigating what turned out to be an amazing story. a chinese intelligence agent, christine fung, became a force within the democratic parties of california. along the way she cultivated the

number of office holders. fung had second wall relationships with two of them identified as mayors from midwestern states. you may recognize the name. eric swellwall is a member of the united states congress. he sits on the house intelligence committee. fung's relationship with him began in 2012. like so many chinese spy, fung used college as her cover. she enrolled as a student at a university in the bay area and immediately joined a number of left wing identity politics organizations on campus. from there, she quite naturally began raising money for democratic candidates. u.s. intelligence officials believe fung had a sexual relationship with eric swalwell. he asked his office about that directly today. his staff replied by saying they couldn't comment on whether or not swalwell had a second wall relationship with fung because

that information might be, quote, classified. they did not elaborate or explain what they meant by that. we do know that when fung met swalwell he was a city councilman in the bay area but had grand political aspirations. fung became his regular companion. she was photographed with him at political events several times. fung apparently pulled in large amounts of money from a variety of sources to tell him get elected to congress. it's not entirely clear where all of that money came from. we do know that fung helped swalwell secure the support of his district's asian american community. it was called a critical factor of his win in 2012. that's not a new trick for chinese intelligence service. the state's senior democrat, diane feinstein employed a chinese spy in her office for nearly 20 years. that spy drove feinstein around and directly assisted her in

outreach to asian american voters. like the spy that feinstein hired, fung gained eric to swalwell's office in washington. u.s. officials say fung managed to install an intern in swalwell's office, almost certainly as a spy for the chinese government. now, we don't know the full extend of fung's intelligence activities. she fled to china. we do know in eric swalwell the chinese government picked a promising vehicle. swalwell is one of the most high profile members of congress. last year he ran for president of the united states. and every turn, eric swalwell has remained a reliable source of chinese government propaganda. as a member of the house intelligence committee, he styled himself as an expert at spotting foreign interference in our government, remarkably. as you may remember, he spent years accusing the sitting president of working for a hostile power.

>> the question has shifted from whether the president is working with the russians to what evidence exists that the president is not working with the russians. he's a tray tore. i don't say that lightly. i worked as a prosecutor for seven years. >> we want evidence before you say that, but you said an agent of russia. do you believe the president is a russian agent? >> i think he acts on russia's behalf and he puts russia's interests ahead too often of america's interests. >> do you believe the president right now has been an agent of the russians? >> yes, i think there's more evidence, yes. i think all the arrows point in that direction. i haven't seen a single piece of evidence that he's not. >> looking back, it's hard to watch that tape. the irony is overwhelming. it's always those who have the most to hide who attack other people for the very things they've done, always. even at the time he was saying it, it was obvious to us that something was very wrong with

eric swalwell. two years ago we asked swalwell to come on this show and reveal the evidence he claims he collected on russian collusion. swalwell claim. he made loud noises and he left. he had no evidence. but he didn't stop making allegations. here he is at a hearing with jim comey back in 2017. >> i want to talk about the kremlin play book. there are a number of ways a foreign adversary can influence a person. do you agree with that? >> yes. >> financial? >> yes, that can be one. >> romance. >> yes. >> compromise. >> correct. >> setting up a compromise. >> yes. >> how about inadvertently compromising? you stumble into that surveillance and they take that information and try to use to it coerce you. >> that's part of the play book.

>> it's part of the play book. part of the kremlin play book, eric swalwell says. what they do, these foreign intel services, they use sex, a honey trap, if you will, to set up a compromise. spoken like a man who knows that subject quite well. when the russia hoax subsided, as it inevitably did because it was a lie, swalwell turned his energies to his first love, which was defending the government of china from all criticism. in march, swalwell told the rest of us we are racist if we describe where the coronavirus came from. he said they are not only misleading the public about a disease with confirmed cases in over 100 cases, they are stoking racism and xenophobia in our community. diseases don't have an ethnicity, period. take those words and type them into google and you will find an logs almost precisely to the word in chinese state media.

that's what he was repeating. if you ask eric swalwell, blaming the chinese government for the coronavirus was a mistake. the right reproach is to defer to the chinese government as you possibly can. in 2017, swalwell expressed outrage that the trump administration was taking too tough a position with china's alley, north korea. he wrote this. the president's reckless and inconsistent north korea strategy risks american lives. instead swalwell demanded trump must, quote, talk to experts, allies and china. swalwell had been saying similar things for years. in 2013, for example, he demanded that we, quote, engage china and russia to keep iran nuclear free. do you notice a pattern here? of course you do. and here's the amazing thing. as of tonight, with all this information public, eric swalwell, who has used his office to promote beijing's talking points almost word for

word, a man who admits to a close personal relationship with an actual chinese spy, who helped him get elected to congress, raised money for him and put his intern probably another spy in his office, that man continues to serve on the house intelligence committee, where he has unrestricted access to classified information. how is this happening? josh holly is a united states senator who represents the state of missouri as a republican. we're happy to have him on tonight. senator, thanks for coming. how is this man, now that we know what we know, serving on the house intelligence committee? >> yeah, absolutely unbelievable, tucker. these revelations ought to be a shock and wakeup call to everybody in washington. i can tell you, i bet they won't be because we've seen the washington politicians and the d.c. establishment look the other way with china for years and years now. it's not as if they haven't known. it's not as if they haven't

known that the chinese has enacted espionage efforts against the u.s. it is known they are using tech companies to spy on americans, trying to leverage that information against us. it's not as if they haven't known that the trade policies and other economic policies that we pursue with china have been ruinous for american workers. they've known all of that. they just don't care. d.c. doesn't care and they still don't care. >> tucker: this seems, i mean, the analogy to the claims they made about russia are bewildering. almost everything they claimed this administration did with russians, contact with russian intelligence agents, compromise with the russian government, nonist was true. all of it is what they've been doing. have you noticed this? >> absolutely. it's exactly what they have been doing. unfortunately, the chinese effort here the much deeper than the people in washington are willing to admit. i can tell you intelligence

agencies have made very clear to senator, and i know because i have seen the briefings, i have heard the briefings. they make clear the chinese have a massive sprawling espionage effort they are trying to influence senators. they are actively trying to spy on elected officials. we know with companies like tik tok. china is hungry for every piece of data that they can get on the american people. they are leveraging every technology in they have with companies like tik tok and others trying to gather that information on americans. and, unfortunately, what has d.c. done about it? basically, nothing. i mean, nothing. they just look the other way. this is why it's time to stand up to china, to take firm action to ban tik tok, to get out of these ruinous trade deals and to say no more. >> tucker: i just got to ask you a quick question as someone who's run for office. if you found out that a bundler,

someone who has bundled money for you in one of your campaigns was an agent of the hostile foreign power, would you be concerned about where some of the money that person bundled came from? >> yeah, absolutely. you absolutely would be concerned. the first thing you would do is report all of it to the fbi and every relevant law enforcement agent and say, we will absolutely cooperate. we've got to get to the bottom of this. to have the chinese government now helping elect members of congress, i mean, this is like something out of a movie. again, i go back to the fact that the d.c. establishment, they don't want to hear it. they want to go back to the good old days of cozying up with china, big deals with china, welcoming china to our shores in ever increasing numbers in terms of access to our economy. that's what they want. that's what we've got to say no to. >> tucker: this is literally espionage. schiff runs that committee.

they allow this to continue. it is shocking. senator hawley, great to see you. thank you. we spent a lot of time over the last year chronicling the slow motion class of american cities. our second largest city is on the verge of collapse tonight, we're sad to say. they've now legalized a whole laundry list of crimes. people will flee los angeles. we'll tell you how it's happening, who did it and why, after the break. in a land not so far away,

people are saving hundreds on the most reliable network with xfinity mobile. they can choose from the latest phones or bring their own. and choose the data option that's right for them. they even get nationwide 5g at no extra cost. and since they are on the carrier rated #1 in customer satisfation, they live happily ever after. again, again! xfinity mobile. your wireless. your rules. your way to stay closer together. click, call, or visit an xfinity store today.

>> tucker: the district attorney for the city of los angeles was sworn in on monday of this week. that would be yesterday. if you've not heard his name, you should know he is best known for destroying the city of san francisco. he was the district attorney there for eight years from 2011-2019. under his tenure, san francisco led the state of california in property crimes and violent crimes but right near the bottom in arrests. you might be wondering why someone with a track record like that, how that person could move up and become d.a. in los angeles or anywhere for that matter. the answer, of course, is that he had powerful help.

his campaign received millions of dollars from george soros and other left wing donors, people who don't live anywhere near the communities he plans to destroy. and he does plan to. immediately after his swearing in he made it clear he's going to do what he did to san francisco to los angeles. he declared prosecutors will not pursue most cases of, trespassing, drug possession, disturbing the peace, resisting arrest. here's how he broke the news. >> are we criminalizing behavior largely associated with poverty. loitering, drunken in public, public intoxication and more. >> tucker: mm-hmm. so poor people just can't help themselves. they loiter. they're drunk in public. they have to commit crimes. they resist arrest. violent crimes. they're poor so this is what

they dothat's insulting, of course. but that's also the beginning of the end of society itself. when you tell people they are allowed to resist arrest, what are you saying? of course you're saying that the police have no right to stop crime. what happens then? not enough, he believes. bail itself has to be eliminated. watch this. >> my office will roll out a plan to end money bail in los angeles in its entirety. we will be the largest office in the nation who will eliminate cash bail. >> tucker: not just cash bail and not just decriminalizing resisting arrest and public drunkenness, but the death penalty. >> racism and the death penalty in our country are intertwined. the reality is that the death

penalty is racist. beginning today, it's off the table in l.a. county. >> tucker: mark debo is former deputy district attorney in los angeles. he stepped down a couple months ago. he joins us to assess what these changes mean for his city, the second biggest in our country. thank you very much for joining us tonight. we appreciate it. so what do you think -- take the politics out of it. what are the practical effects of the changes on the city of los angeles, do you believe? >> i think you said it when you said he was going to destroy los angeles. it's kind of ironic that yesterday when he made these proclamations it was pearl harbor day and he carpet bombed the district attorneys office with nine special directives about 80 pages that basically dismantles and throws out decades of policy that inform

what prosecutors do every day. and he's doing it recklessly. he did it in ten minutes in his speech. basically what you said, despite what the law is. in california on a regular basis, there's been legislation to do away with the death penalty. it's always been defeated. people have voted the death penalty in. but he doesn't care what the people voted for. cash bail was just recently, you know, defeated at the polls. he doesn't care what the public wants. he is not just a prosecutor. he's now the legislature. he's going to pick what laws he likes and what laws he'll enforce. it's a second public defender's office. it's a sad day for all the da's. i just retired. i don't have to be there, but i'm sad about it.

i did it for 35 years. i believe, for the most part, there are always issues. but d.a.'s in washington county try to do the right thing. if you have a victim of a crime, defendant or his family on the other shoulder crying, you tend to listen to the victim. you want to get to the truth. you never hear him mention the suffering of victims. the defendant is the new victim. the defendant is the one who needs compassion. the defendant is the one who's being harmed by these policies. you never hear what the victims want or what we need to do to make our community safe. that's the problem with this guy. >> tucker: you just upset me describing what the problem is. you did it so eloquently. marc debbaudt, thank you for coming on.

>> i could go on for hours. >> the host of the adam corrolla show joins us now. i heard from a friend of mine in l.a. last night that he's so convinced this will lead to the destruction of the city that he's planning to leave. what's your reaction to it? >> yeah, i'm actually doing this remote in a van right now. as soon as we're done, i'm going to drive this van to houston. >> you are leaving the state of your birth. >> you have to. do the simple thought experiment. i just heard today elon musk was moving to texas. the smartest man on the planet has decided to move away from the dumbest governor in the united states. when the smartest guy in the world says i'm moving, what's that say to the rest of us?

>> tucker: what does it say when a small group of billionaires get to decide the rules the rest of us live by, even though election after election shows people don't want it? is that democracy? >> no, it isn't. you know, the left has this way of approaching problems and it's a bizarre reverse engineering of a problem, which is los angeles is like a house that's riddled with termites. so los angeles' reaction is fire the termite inspector. >> tucker: and what happens to the house when you do that? >> it just turns into a pile of sawdust. it's like saying, we can't make it up the hill in this old truck, we can't go fast enough, the engine doesn't work. just take the speedometer and push it with your finger up to 80 miles an hour. it doesn't work.

los angeles, by the way, you know the movie "escape from los angeles" with kurt russell? that has now become a reality show. >> tucker: as i said three times, you've been there your whole life. i think of l.a., i think of you. do you know other people who, like you, have decided they can't stand it anymore? >> it comes up literally every day. when are you moving? i talked to dennis prager earlier today. he wanted to know when i was moving. everyone who can move is going to move and everyone else who doesn't pay taxes and isn'ted contributing, will stay. that's when the whole house comes down. >> tucker: adam carolla, good luck in your van. i appreciate you coming on tonight. >> thank you. >> tucker: george soros did not build los angeles. he had no role in making los angeles one of the best cities

in the world, which it has been for over 100 years. he has no right to destroy what he didn't build. and yet he is. period. welsh control of the united states senate, which actually matters, despite what they're telling you, will be decided in two runoff elections in georgia january 5th. mail-in ballots will be allowed. mail-in ballot fraud is still a major concern. again, you're hearing people say it doesn't matter who controls the united states senate. donald trump junior disagrees. he thinks it does matter. he joins us after the break to tell us why.

>> tucker: in just a few weeks two senate race special elections in the state of jar skwra will decide which party controls the united states senate and therefore the united states government. already more than 71,000 people who did not vote in the general election last month have requested mail-in ballots for

the january 5th runoff. how can we be certain this election is on the level and what's at stake? donald trump jr. thinks a lot's at stake. he joins us tonight. thanks so much for coming on. >> thank you very much, tucker. i appreciate it. >> tucker: how can we be certain that this election is above suspicion in the way it's conducted? >> first and foremost we have to pressure our legislators to make sure they are watching these things. that they don't allow this craziness that's gone on all over the country to go on, where people don't have to follow the rule of law. they can adjust the law. people who aren't actually allowed to make laws are implementing new laws that people have to live by and then saying, too late, we have to figure this out. this kind of stuff is insanity and has to be pushed back on. we can't allow it to happen. we can't allow ourselves to lose the senate. if you believe in conservatism, if you believe in freedom, if

you believe in individual rights, if you believe in the 2nd amendment, we have to combat this nonsense. we have to win. we have to hold the senate in georgia. also, tucker, one thing i have to say. i appreciate you calling out eric swalwell. as someone who was probably the number two recipient of his tin foil hat brigade attacks about russia for years where he called me a traitor, i find it very ironic that he was perhaps sleeping with a chinese spy. certainly one that had infiltrated his inner circle. what i find scarier is that you are one of the few people, as usual, calling balls and strikes and calling this sort of stuff out while the rest of the media remains silent. we shouldn't be surprised about the media being silent on this issue, which is truly a national security threat, while this man sits on the house intelligence committee. but we also shouldn't be surprised that someone who basically may have soiled himself on national tv also allowed his agency and his group

to be infiltrated by a chinese spy. thank you for calling out swalwell as well. >> tucker: "washington post" is owned by jeff bezos who runs china's biggest retail operation. maybe there's a reason they're not saying much. some are saying it doesn't really matter who controls the senate. we're out, we're not participating. what would you say to them? >> i think that's literally what the democrats want you to believe. they would love for you to take this stance that it doesn't matter, to roll over and die. they can pack the courts. they can attack the 2nd amendment. they'll give d.c. statehood. they'll end puerto rico state wood. you'll have four permanent democrat senators in a balance that we will literally never overcome and it will be a front to the constitution and freedoms we hold so dear, tucker. this is what the democrats want

for life. they would love to demoralize you so you sit at home, allow them to go ballot harvest, go win. we should be winning georgia. they changed the game. they manipulated covid to do whatever they want to do. if you sit back and allow apathy to take over, and allow that to rule your thought process, you are literally giving the democrats everything they have hoped for and dreamed for from conservatives for the last 50 years. we cannot allow that. my father's legacy, all of his accomplishments, all of the regulations, taking on china, pulling out of endless wars. everything that he's accomplished is on the table as far as i'm concerned in this election. if you're a trump guy, if you believe that, you'd be foolish to listen to a few individuals who say, just stay home. it's like they're giving democrats and chuck shumer everything he's dreamed of for a long time. >> tucker: don jr., nicely put. i appreciate you coming on.

>> thank you very much, tucker. i appreciate it. >> tucker: so every election you see people on television telling you this is the most important election of our life time. does seem like these are significant elections. how significant? what rides on this? he's seen a lot of elections. happy to have him on tonight. chris, thanks for coming on. what do you think is at stake here? >> well, put simply, control of the u.s. senate is at stake. it will either be republicans narrowly in control or democrats barely in control. that makes a huge difference, because when republicans are in control, who ever's the majority leader decides what gets to the floor. he sets the schedule, or she. hasn't been a she yet. the chairman and chair women of the committees are all republican and they set the schedules and the issues to be dealt with by the committee. that's how congress works.

it's a big deal. i mean, nancy pelosi and her team over at the house of representatives have got all kinds of legislative measures that they want passed. they can pass them, but right now they have to compromise with the senate to get them to go anywhere. they'll never reach the president's desk. so it's a big deal. it's a very unusual circumstance, tucker. special elections happen from time to time, but you rarely have two for the united states senate occurring simultaneously. very unusual. somebody told me the other day that people always vote party lines in special elections. a very knowledgeable person said that to me. my response was, how would you know? when has this ever happened before? i can think of a time when it's happened. there's no question about it. a lot of what don jr. said there about his father's legacy is reasonable. what he said is correct. democrats will be free to undo

much more of what donald trump has done if they can get control of both houses of congress. so it's a big deal. >> tucker: they'll also be free to prosecute donald trump as a private citizen. there are indications that some would like to. does that seem like a possibility if they control everything? >> well, i don't know how much -- if the government, next administration, biden administration, wanted to prosecute donald trump, they'd be free to try. republican control of one house isn't going to alter that. it might have a lot to say, republican house, republican house and senate would have to say about what investigations took place on capitol hill because they set the schedule and they pick the issue. but as far as prosecution, that's a justice department executive function. they would be free to try that. i'm not sure how far they'd get, but they would be free to try. i'm sure some state

prosecutions, in new york in particular, might go forward as well. how far they'd get remains to be seen. it's hard for me to believe that the president, as a private citizen back in the day, when he was setting up all these complex business deals and investments, that all that stuff wasn't carefully lawyered. but things happen. >> tucker: things do. brit hume, great to see you. >> thank you. >> tucker: one of the big changes this year is we learn you don't have the right to raise your own children. the government lets you know when you can send them to school, when they can spend time with their friends. this is the new world that we're living in. one new law would make it official. your children belong to the government. government can do to them what governments want. we'll tell you what that bill says next.

>> tucker: one big change in this pandemic is that you're no longer allowed to raise your own

children. the experts raise them. you don't decide whether to send your children to school. you don't decide whether your kids go to the playground or not. now lawmakers in the state of washington are going even farther. they're advancing legislation to prevent parents from making decisions about their children's medical care, serious medical care. the new law under consideration would establish, quote, school based health centers where minors can receive medical treatment without parental consent. what is the point of this? there is a point. the author of how to fight back against the online assault on democracy. he joins us now. thanks a lot for coming on. >> thanks, tucker, for having me. appreciate it. >> tucker: the behind this is sob shunable, of course you ought to be involved in your minor children's medical care. but what's the purpose of this, do you believe? >> well, it's further separating decision making between the child and the parent. the bill is structured in such a

way that the child can go into a clinic in the school, receive medical treatment and then the parent receives a bill but the bill is say nonmouse. all they receive is the cost that's been charged to their healthcare provider. >> how young a child are we talking about here? >> this law would enable a 13-year-old to receive treatment in schools for anything ranging from std's to abortions to gender dysphoria. >> >> tucker: the idea is that your child could be convinced by the therapist at school that he or she needed to transition and could receive life altering drugs from the school without your knowledge. is that your understanding of it? >> that is correct. in the last legislative cycle, a bill was passed that introduced comprehensive sex ed to children as young as in the 3rd grade. as we know, children at the age of puberty are confused. 98% of boys, once they've gone

through puberty, refer back to their biological state. 88% of girls do. so we're confusing children at an age when they're most at risk. >> tucker: and so now some school employee could make this decision completely senate and apart from the parent and begin to change a 13-year-old's body without any parental involvement. i'm repeating this because i want to make certain this is what's going on potentially. >> that is correct. what rights one has as a parent -- what is the role of the parent now? just to send your child off to school and allow the school to make all of these decisions on your behalf? >> tucker: to pay for the wheol thing and put up and obey. this is such a threat to the relationship between parents and children. you would think there would be

push back. is there or are parents too embarrassed to say anything? >> this bill is currentfully committee. our legislative cycle begins first week of january house bill 2288 in washington state is what i'm trying to raise awareness around, to make sure parents are aware and particularly during the age of covid, it's going to be very difficult because it will be a virtual session for parents to lobby their legislators in person. so the time is challenging to refute this legislation. >> tucker: boy, i hope people rise up against this. this is one of the most sinister power grabs i can imagine. i appreciate coming on. i'm sure you will pay a cost for doing it, but i think it's worth doing. thank you. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: so joe biden announced a new nominee to his cabinet tonight. there's just one problem. biden doesn't know anything about this person, the job he's supposed to fill or even how to pronounce his name.

we've looked into this because we're journalists and that's our job. we think we've solved the mystery for joe biden. just ahead, we'll let him know who this guy is and what he's going to be doing once he gets the job. that's straight ahead.

>> i'm proud of this group. i nominate javier -- >> tucker: that's going to be our president. poor joe biden, he doesn't know who these people are. that was biden attempting to pronounce the name of his new nominee to lead what is actually known as the health and human services department. who is javiera bestera? joe biden has no idea. he is the president of center for medical progress.

we're happy to have him back. thank you very much for coming on. who is this xavier becerra? >> sure. tucker, when aeufrbier becerra is successor to kamala harris who was his predecessor, he has completely abandoned all fairness and equality under the law for the sake of following the whims of his extremist pro abortion patrons. your viewers probably remember my under cover video series of planned parenthood's top leadership negotiating the sale of baby body parts. that series led to planned parenthood's business partners in southern california pleading guilty and being shut down in a plea deal with the southern california district attorney yet at the behest of planned parenthood, kamala harris launched a raid on my home to

seize the videos. kamala harris launched the first ever law enforcement case under the california video recording law against a journalist and xavier becerra continued the persecution, filed 15 bogus felony charges against me and one of my investigative journalist colleagues all under the california video recording law, first time in history that under cover video reporting widely practiced in the state of california, praised by previous attorney generals for agendas that they support. first time in history that it has ever been prosecuted under the california video reporting law, solely, admittedly according to the folks in becerra's attorney general's office solely because of the content of the message we're putting out, that planned parenthood traffics and sells baby parts. >> that's the guy biden wants to run hhs?

david, i appreciate that you're telling us what happened to you and informing of us of that. >> thank you. >> tucker: we're out of time. that was fast. we'll be back tomorrow night 8 p.m. here's sean hannity. >> hannity: you're not surprised. nor am i. nor are you. nor is the audience. huge breaking news. the united states supreme court just ordered a response to the legal challenge that was filed by the state of texas where officials there are now contesting the election results in georgia, wisconsin, michigan and pennsylvania. this is the blockbuster suit we told you was likely coming. we began to discuss it. the deadline for the response is thursday by 3:00 p.m. this challenge has now officially survive