informing us of that. good to see you. >> thank you. >> tucker: we are out of time tonight. that was fast. the show that's the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, and groupthink. here is sean hannity. >> sean: it would be good if the media vetted this a lot ahead of time because you are not surprised nor mri nor is this audience. welcome to "hannity" tonight. huge breaking news, the united states supreme court just ordered a response to the legal challenge filed by the state of texas where officials are contesting the election results. in georgia, wisconsin, was stricken michigan,pennsylvania. this was the blockbuster suit we told you likely coming, we began to discuss the deadline for the response is thursday by 3:00 p.m. this challenge has now officially survived outright dismissal contrary to what many

experts were predicting today. could be a game changer. we will lay out all the case and have exclusive reaction from the person that brought that suit, the texas attorney general ken paxton. also kayleigh mcenany. we begin first tonight, you need to know about this critical new challenge. all you need to know about the mob, the media, they will all dismiss it. a well-written case, well thought out, it was well delivered. and apparently received well enough that they want to hear arguments. first and foremost, article three of our u.s. constitution -- this is really not complicated. stay with us. requires that the case be filed directly at the u.s. supreme court which has what is called original jurisdiction in disputes between multiple states. if the supreme court decides to take up the case, the justices will be tasked with deciding whether or not the states, georgian, wisconsin, michigan, pennsylvania, whether they

violated the u.s. constitution in a variety of ways, that is all laid out right here in this suit brought by texas. it includes article two of our constitution which clearly articulates the following: each state shall appoint in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct a number of elect-oh ares. constitutionally up to state legislatures to the side election policy. for example, in pennsylvania we already know that this was clearly violated when the mail in ballot deadline was pushed back without lawmaker approval. article two was also likely violated as we've been telling you in the state of georgia with that idiotic consent degree which relax the signature verification requirements and mail in ballots, creating what was an unequal system. this policy was once again done without lawmaker approval. it was a consent agreement but

with the secretary state of georgia and constitutionally, as we pointed out, it is the legislature of georgia that should have decided any such thing. remember, that lawsuit was brought by the georgia democratic party, the senatorial campaign committee and the democratic campaign committees. this was a consent agreement just with the secretary of state, not with the state legislature. that is not all. this new texas suit also alleges multiple violations of what is known as the equal protection clause and relies on very compelling court precedent. chris goldbach had a great interview with me on radio today, pointed out in a terrific mark added op ed. bush v gore. one florida county treated ballots one way and another florida county, they treated ballots a whole different way. we saw a clear examples of all

of this unequal treatment among counties in state after state. that includes vastly different policies for election observers, poll workers, and county procedures. to michigan for example we know that some of the county is denied access partisan observers which the statutory language calls for and other counties forced observers back at a distance of 6 feet. others 20 feet away from the vote counting process which prevented them from doing what they were legally allowed to do and, frankly it was written into the law. other counties decided to allow full access to partisan observers. ask yourself, how is that unequal application of the law? make no mistake, this case deserves to be heard. it has merit, it has press event in the american people deserve their day in court. during a present sole election, if laws are violated in one state voters in every other state bill the consequences. that would say maybe this in

franchising their honest and legal votes. that's why according to the suit, a dark cloud hangs over the 2020 presidential election. the new gallup poll, 89% of americans have serious doubts of this election process. rasmussen, 57% but they did not want the president to concede and today the president called on lawmakers, the supreme court, to do what is right. take a look. >> hopefully the next administration will be the trump administration because you cannot steal hundreds of thousands of votes. you can't have fraud and deception and all the things that they did and slightly win a swing state and you just have to look at the numbers, look what has been on tape, look at all the corruption and, well, you can't win and election like that. let's see if someone has the courage, whether it's a legislature or legislatures or a justice of the supreme court or a number of justices at the

supreme court, let's see if they have the courage to do what everybody in this country knows is right. >> tonight like always, we will continue our own independent path. we do not follow the mob, the media, any other show. we do our own thing here. this lawsuit from texas is a very serious legal challenge. at the very least it has a right to be heard. the country deserve it, you deserve it. we, the people deserve it. i do not know with the justices are going to do but the american people deserve answers and we need to have confidence in both the integrity and the results of every state's election in the process. because we have millions of innocent americans in states where the law, the constitution were followed. they are then disenfranchised in a corrupt process. it's not okay that partisan observers were blocked from performing what they were legally allowed in the law calls for them to do. they are critical duties. it's not okay but th the chain f

custody gets lost. it is not okay that election laws are changed by politicians at a whim in the middle or after the game has been played without any legislative approval. it's not okay that mail in ballots have different signature verification requirements that an in person ballot. as the texas superficially describes, "our country stands at perfect crossroads. either the constitution matters and must be followed even when some officials consider it inconvenient, out of date, or simply a piece of parchment on display at the national archives. we ask the court to choose the former. in the coming days, the u.s. supreme court will send an important message. make no mistake. whatever happens, this will have serious, long-lasting implications, ramifications for every single election to come. and that's why tonight, every decent republican attorney general with a brain needs to get busy working on their amicus briefs to support

this texas suit. here with more is the texas attorney general ken paxton. first of all, i've got it all right here. i highlighted all of it. read it cover to cover. well done. first of all, why you decided to engage in this? tell us the law and the constitutional principles that are at stake here. >> first of all you did a fantastic job describing the lawsuit. it's really important to my state that my folders be represented. if other states do not follow the constitution, if there state legislature isn't responsible for overseeing their elections and we have other people who are not under the constitution supposed to be doing this, it affects my state. so our job is to make sure that the constitution is followed and that every vote count. in this case i'm not sure that every vote was counted. not in the right way. >> let's go to the heart of

this. number one, let's go to the beginning. article three of the constitution, this is a very small number of categories of cases that the supreme court has original jurisdiction. in other words, this does not have to start at a lower court. explain that in the context of now they do the response to your suit earlier tonight. >> is an important point you're bringing up. in a state on state suit them the only place to go is the u.s. supreme court. other lawsuits start at the district court level and they have a right to be heard at least once, whether they have a good case or bad case. all requested we want to be heard. the only place we can go is the u.s. supreme court and so we are pleading with the u.s. supreme court. please hear our case, give us a chance at least to argue what we think is right. we want to argue the constitution. >> the supreme court has opined in the past that it may decline to accept the case but as we

watch all of this unfold today, look, we had a different possible outcome today and that is, you know, we were waiting today to see if the court would or would not hear the case and now we have a briefing schedule. correct? >> i really appreciate that the court has asked the other states to respond so we have a chance hopefully after they respond to go to the core and make our arguments on both sides and at least let the supreme court make a decision on what is the law in this case. a question that they have never answered as it relates to the facts that we are presenting. >> tucker: >> sean: this is the point. this is where you go into very specific detail about article two of the constitution and how they violated what we call the elector is because when judicial change the rule of elections or

governing elections. that is constitutionally as clear and unambiguous as anything in the constitution, that there is one body that has that constitutional authority and that would be the state legislatures. >> sean, you make a really important point here. it's the responsibility of state legislatures per the constitution to set the rule for election of elect doors. this was overrated in the four states we are talking about overridden by other officials whether they were other government officials and that's not the way our constitution works and that's the challenge we have in front of the court. can this be overridden by people who are not responsible on the constitution for doing this? >> sean: can you explain how the electors cause in michigan and p.a. were violated? >> all those cases, they allowed male imbalance in cases they were not supposed to, they allowed for noncitizen verification which is really

important. when you request a mail-in ballot, you have to sign for that application and they will verify. when you send your ballot in on the sleeve of a ballot, they'll usually verify that signature to ensure those two signatures match. if you waive those requirements you have no way to go back and verify that the person who requested the application, that's a pretty important thing when in pennsylvania you go from 233,000 mail in ballots four years ago to 2.5 million and the difference in the election was only 81,000. that's a very important issue to ignore. >> sean: what's fascinating about this suit is at no point do you even have to go to the area proving fraud which i think was proven in a lot of these states and in those cases they are run independently and a lot of the states we are talking about. but let's talk about the second constitutional violation that you point out in your suit and actually rely on a landmark case of bush v gore where the

supreme court held that they violated the equal protection clause and the 14th amendment and when one florida county treated ballots one way, chads, swinging, hanging, perforated, old and dimpled, and they did it differently from county to county and voters had the constitutional right to have all ballots in the state of florida equally county to county, explain how that comes into play in this suit. >> tucker: that explains the wisdom of the constitution, a state wide body of legislature make the rules instead of allowing county by county distinctions in different where people are treated differently in different states and i think that was part of the genius of what the founders put in place is making sure that everybody ie state was at least treated the l four states we have county by county distinctions that treated voters differently and therefore have unreliable results and that's a problem.

>> sean: you also talk about remedy in the lawsuit and you are asking the supreme court to remand the appointment of electors in these four states back to the state legislatures and there is even the mcpherson black or case of 1842 that are argue was probably precedent-setting in this regard as well, am i right about that? >> you're absolutely right and this was traditional in our country. it was not uncommon for a legislative body to elect and elector. we are saying, look, the results here, we can't put the genie back in the bottle because we do not know how to match up signatures anymore because they were separated from that. since we can't go back and do that, we want to go back to the legislature and let them make a decision because they were elected by the people of the states. >> sean: mr. attorney general, fascinating. going to be an interesting week to watch and i hope they have the courage. breaking today, another almost unbelievable development out of

upstate new york. you can't make this up. we had a couple of districts in upstate new york that have been problematic and in one congressional race, the republican leads by a whopping 12 votes. well, another 12 uncounted votes mysteriously appeared yesterday after last week they just mysteriously found 55 other uncounted votes turning up. to join us with an update on all these election irregularities across the country is kayleigh mcenany. okay. it is over a month and we are still finding votes but only when needed, apparently. just like, we found thousands in georgia weeks after the electi election. >> yeah. that's right. in multiple locations come you can't make this up in the election you just mentioned, they find 12 ballots. you have to ask questions here. it's quite peculiar. every ballot should be counted on election day, sean.

i want to underscore everything you just said, everything the attorney general just said. that document you have before you, the texas be commonwealth of pennsylvania, this is the single most important document of the 2020 election. everything you and i discussed over the last few weeks, the case here in pennsylvania, case here in wisconsin, this all combined in us a sink very well sourced footnoted document or you have supreme court barred attorneys going before the supreme court saying these are the facts. these are the truths. we separated fact from fiction and here it is. i encourage everyone to read this document. it is big. >> sean: i pointed out how strong i thought the pennsylvania case was because the state legislature literally bypassed their own state constitution and had very specific language in it as it relates to mail in ballots. and the limits they put on it and the court said no, they aren't taking it. the fact this was taken up tells

us what? >> the fact it was taken up tells us the supreme court could be taking a very hard look at this. as this case says, either the constitution matters or it's just a piece of parchment in the national archives. one thing though, sean, really interesting in this case, i encourage everyone to read this paragraph, we know there is a mass influx of mail in ballots. in georgia, 94 increase in mail in ballots. you'd expect the rejection rate to be higher this time around then in 2016 with all these new voters. but instead of being higher, it was 70 times lower and the statistical analysis done here in this case by an expert shows that if you had the same rejection rate as in 2016 in georgia, we expected to be higher. but if you just had the same, that would be a net gain of 25,587 votes for president trump, more than doubled the margin he'd need in georgia. a concise history of how democrats change the laws,

eliminated safeguards, mass mail out ballots to change the system in the mass mail in experiment. >> sean: i'm having a hard time getting over that he got 15 million votes more than barack obama. i don't know. i'm kind of suspicious. i'm suspicious he got 15 million more votes than hilary too. i don't know. couldn't get a thousand people for his virtual thanksgiving message to sign up. nobody on the campaign trail would go to any event that he did. and of course, in every major city except for atlanta, milwaukee, detroit, philadelphia and out in nevada, oh, it seems that joe biden underperformed with minority voters, but over performed in these very, well, how communally happening cities i just mentioned. >> that's right. you are pointing out the anomalies that happened in these elections. what this lawsuit does is it

looks at those at those anomalies in the here's what it finds. it finds that the chances of biden coming from as far behind as he was at 3:00 a.m. on election night, the chances of that are one in one claude julien. the chances of him -- prevailing in all four states he was so far behind him the are that are one and a quadrille into the fourth power. this is all outlined right here in this lawsuit, everything we've discussed in a source document by attorneys before the united states supreme court. >> sean: people want to know what a quadrille you and is? god forbid, it's biden, aoc, bolshevik bernie, kamala, you will learn more about the word claude julien in debt by the time they are done with their giveaways, free everything. going to watch is very closely. you are right. we both have a copy of right here, right in front of the camera in front of us is pivotal. this is now a key moment and a key time.

thank you, kayleigh. we have more on team trump spike to have every legal vote count counted. also a new investigation. new information. hunter biden's conflict of interest in how they compromise national security, how they represented an extortion threat and why special counsel is needed. we've been doing the story since 2018 and the mob, of course, put biden in the candidate protection program. we will not be silenced. ken buck will join us, the congressman, and jim jordan straight ahead. one that could mean... a chance to live longer. opdivo plus yervoy is for adults newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer that has spread and that tests positive for pd-l1 and does not have an abnormal egfr or alk gene. it's the first and only approved chemo-free combination of two immunotherapies that works together in different ways

to harness the power of the immune system. opdivo plus yervoy equals a chance for more days. more nights. more beautiful weekends. more ugly sweaters. more big hugs. more small outings. opdivo and yervoy can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. this may happen during or after treatment has ended and can become serious and lead to death. some of these problems may happen more often when opdivo is used with yervoy. see your doctor right away if you have a new or worse cough; chest pain; shortness of breath; diarrhea; severe stomach pain; nausea or vomiting; dizziness; fainting; extreme tiredness; weight changes; constipation; excessive thirst; changes in urine or eyesight; rash; itching; confusion; memory problems; muscle pain or weakness; joint pain; flushing; fever; or tingling in hands and feet. these are not all the possible side effects. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions including immune system problems, or if you've had an organ transplant or lung, breathing, or liver problems. here's to a chance for more together time. a chance to live longer.

ask your doctor about opdivo plus yervoy. thank you to all involved in our clinical trials.

noticks and fleas?o simplifies protection. ask your doctor about opdivo plus yervoy. see ya! heartworm disease? no way! simparica trio is the first chewable that delivers all this protection. and simparica trio is demonstrated safe for puppies. it's simple: go with simparica trio. this drug class has been associated with neurologic adverse reactions, including seizures; use with caution in dogs with a history of these disorders.

protect him with all your heart. simparica trio.

>> hannity: all tonight more major developments in the state of georgia. the rnc filed a lawsuit demanding the lawsuit watchers meaningful access to observe the january 5th senate runoffs. this is critical. in addition to more oversight of the so-called "drop boxes ripe for fraud, even "the new york times" thought so. even the carter and baker commission thought so in 2005. unfortunately, despite all the problems, governor brian kemp has not called the special session that he alone has the power to call to ensure that

george's electionn integrity, especially when it comes to flaws with the state's two-tiered verification process, one standard if you vote by mail, another standard if you vote by person. the one for voting in person far more stringent. the other, far less stringent. the president called out the governor earlier today tweeting "governor trump is down 18 points in a recent poll. don't believe it. it must be more. does not let the people of georgia off the hook unfortunately as a president rightly points out to ensure the integrity of these coming runoffs. it's integral to the presidents for years of hard work and success, it's critical to his family and what would end up being never ending endless investigations of the president and his family. i just want to say this to republicans in georgia. i understand your frustration with your governor and your secretary of state and i share

it. still, the country needs you to turn out and preserve the presidents progress, save the trump agenda in the senate, supporting kelly loeffler and david purview. we don't have the luxury to sit out those important senate races because you have incompetent local officials who don't do their job or make consent agreements i frankly think were unconstitutional to begin with. meanwhile the republicans in the joint and argo committee today, they block the resolution recognizing joe biden as president-elect as at president isfi continuing his fight to restore fairness in elections, the poll is showing 60, 80 plus percent of people see as, welcome malicious save rigs. and was not accurate, was not fair, and that so many irregularities now, people see it e with their own eyes in the can'tt believe what they see. with reaction, rnc chairwoman ronna mcdaniel, along with

trump first corey lewandowski. i know you both are recovering from the covid. thank god. i got a good word from andrew giuliani tonight, his father is doing much better and prayers to everybody in this country that gets this china virus. let's talk about your suit. this was constant in every state. that is the law allows for erpartisan observers to watch te accounting from start to finish. it happened nowhere. it happened with varying standards. >> what i say is i'm so happy aboutte this texas lawsuit. every illegal vote is stealing from a valid vote and every state that conducted their election fraudulently are stealing from states that conducted there is fairly. the georgia dop is suing the state and the sectarian state saying actually follow your law.

allow poll observers to observe before the ballots are separated from the envelope. we can actually look at the d signature and actually monitor the drop boxes. we are filing a lawsuit for them to follow the law that's on the books that they didn't follow in november and we want to make sure that we get this done before this runoff in january. >> how do confidence, >> sean: how do you have confidence, corey, the with all due respect? i can see 6 feet in front of me on anything but it was 6 feet in one place, 20 feet in another place, not allowed in the building and other places. i mean, it's such an important part of the integrity of the outcome so people would have, like most states, confidence in the results. and now, you know, these polls with massive majorities of americans that do not have confidence in the outcome here.

>> sean, we see our states trying to hide the results don't let the poll watchers in prayer i witnessed it firsthand, specifically in philadelphia where pam bondi and i had a court order which allowed us to go in and see what was transpiring and they refuse to let us in. if the states have nothing to hide, i don't understand what they are afraid of having partisan poll watchers going in and observing specifically, sean, most important part is when they separate the ballots from the outside envelopes to the verification of signatures. georgia has to allow this to happen and the leader said under ronna mcdaniel is critical for ourrs success. >> i watched, you are with mayor giuliani and we played the video of the guy that wasn't even allowed, had a credentialed poll watcher, observer, they didn't let him in the building in one case until much later. >> sean i just want to say

thanks, her leadership has been tremendous all the way through these last four years but what she's n doing in georgia right w iss tremendous. she is forcing the secretary of state and the governor to follow their own law when she shouldn't have to be in the position to do that in the first place. i was getting phone calls from family members telling me that we are going to be observers. they are kicking us out, they are not allowing us in. to be quite honest on election day i couldn't believe that that was possible. and now we see all the problems that were going on across the state of georgia. ronna mcdaniel suit right here, the rnc in the state of georgia, the republican party of george's suit is so imperative that we fix this broken system so the people of georgia get a true result on election day in january. it's vital for the future of america because the trump agenda

is on the ballot in georgia in january. >> sean: i share the frustration -- listen, i lived in georgia for a while. as you know, i'm talking to a lot of people down there and they are like why should we bother? number one, the president himself, his accomplishments are directly connected to the outcome of these two senate seats. whether or not the harassment that's been never ending for four years of him and his family continues, you know, with theue likes of andrew wiseman, trump mueller's pitbull. look what they did to ivanka last week, that's at stake here. the people of georgia can stop this power grab in both the house and the senate by voting in this election. it is critical. >> absolutely. i agree with dave. what he accomplishes on the ballot in georgia but you are

right, sean, too. if we send two senators like warnock and ossof to the senate, they'll change the filibuster and change every law where universal mail-in voting and strip away election integrity, and if we send loeffler and purdue, will have a senate to ensurele election integrity so this never happens again and the voters ofpens again and georgia have to get out, protect president trump and his legacy and makes sure we actually get election reform in the united states of america. so this election we will never repeat it. >> if i could really quickly, the president was down at the rally in georgia saturday and he employed the people of georgia, he called for unity. he said, for people who stand by and don't vote, you are allowing socialism to be elected. you are allowing socialists to represent you from georgia. you are allowing chuck schumer's

new york city values to representt georgia. that is not what georgia' georgt and i think they will fully reject all soft and ossof and warnock in january. >> sean: how do you see it playing out in january and early voting starts a week from tonight, a week from today? >> the rnc has done a great job but what i see is what is at stake in this election is the future of ourpu republic. if the democrats win both of those seats, they go on the pack the supreme court, we know it's been part of their agenda, they will take away our civil rights, they will defund our military, defund our police. that's what is at stake in this election. we have two candidates in both kelly loeffler and david purdue who has stood up for american values and both successful business executives and we need that business acumen in washington to control the out-of-control taxes that joe biden wants to bring to the

american people. >> sean: glad you are feeling better, dave. especially corey. thank you all. also developing tonight, remove the ,ken buck calling for a special counsel to investigate, yep, we started this story in our coverage in 2018. peter schweizer writes a best-selling book "secret empires." talks all about zero experience thunter biden, all the nefarios oversea dealings, explosive emails, released in october, those were the ones that the bit tech companies were preventing people from actually reading, all tied to all things biden. joron johnson senate committee n covering hunter biden caught taking in millions for america's adversaries all while his father is vp. by the way, imagine if the name was donald trump jr. or eric trump, or ivanka trump, if any

of them did it, it would be nonstop never ending mob media coverage 24/7 on a loop. so we can begin in 2013, peter schweizer pointed outhw in his book "secret empires," that's when hunter zero experience along with his dad on that trip to china. ten days later, later to become a $1.5 billion sweetheart deal with a chinese state backed investment fund, the bank of china, we haven't been able to find any experience or qualifications there. of course we learn from ron johnson and chuck grassley that hunter biden open up a joint account with a chinese national connected to china's communistpa party? that same bank account would fund a family shopping spree for hunter and his family. february 2014, 0 experience hunter got a whopping $3.5 million wire transfer from

a corrupt russian oligarch, the wife of the ex-mayor of moscow, known as the first lady of moscow. again, play a little game. replace name hunter biden with donald trump jr. or any trump kid and what do you have? do you think the democrats, the mob and the media, big tech, they would censor, not report, put the trump in the campaign protection program, and it wasn't just china. it wasn't just russia. in april of 2014, we now know that according to johnson and grassley, their report, because extend oligarch wired over 140 grand -- yup, to hunter biden's firm. what was it for? a brand new pretty expensive car. hunter, zero experience in kazakhstan. may of 2140 experience hunter began receiving massive monthly payouts from ukrainian energy company three small holdings.

the company was owned by a pro-russian government oligarch. once again come a hunterr with o experience in ukraine, no experience in oil, energy, gas, gets paid millions of dollars. goes on to "gma." why do you think you got it? maybe because your dad is inti charge of ukrainian palisade?ng overwhelming evidence that biden has been lying all along, well aware of his sons dealings. for example, the email sent from ukrainian executive april 2015 thinking zero experience hunter for the "opportunity to meet your father. of course, biden himself ragging on tape about, well, you got six hours, fire the prosecutor or you aren't getting a billion taxpayer dollars. that would be a quid, pro, andg

quo by joe. and got fired six hours later. son of a bee. they did it. now the call for this investigation in the corrupt biden business bureau. it's way past time for real accountability, it is time forut real answers about just how much joe biden was willing to sell access to the vice presidency and his son and his family cashed in. big time. here with more, republican congressman jim jordan and congressman ken buck. let's talk about what you are fighting for and asking for he here. >> absolutely. what i'm asking for is the attorney general of united states to appoint a special counsel to look into the very facts that you just pointed out. there is a serious pattern of corruption that hunter biden has and engaged in with joe biden's knowledge. it was a few days after a burisma board member discusses with the board of burisma and gets $33,000 in payments. hunter biden on the plane with

his dad, air force 2, going to china, this investment company has created. there is this pattern ofs behavior. if the vice president of united states is willing to do it, there's no reason to think the president of united states wouldn't do the same. >> sean: when i talk to people telling me, is there anything reported on the trump russia 2016 collusion the hoax that was wrong, anything about the dirty dossier that we reported that was wrong question like anything about premeditated fraud that was wrong? any of that wrong? >> no, anything we were wrong about was worse than we thought and the way you framed it up is she's why the reason that canon's call for a special counsel is needed. they went after his family, deposed john jr. for 30 hours. turns out the whole time it was actually the biden who was enriching themselves with foreign deals. oh, what did we learn today?

>> sean: my point is -- speak of the very people accused them for four years, we were cozying up with chinese pies for goodness' case! we need n for what can called fr to get to the bottom of this. >> sean: you were there, durham was there after they horwitz report corroborated everything you had said and what our ensemble cast had said, why didn't anything happen?na is anything going to happen? >> sean, i don't know. it's infuriating for the entire country. the attorney general told us that he's given the designation of counsel to mr. durham. let's hope he days the same thing for what can is calling for but we'll have to wait and see. i remind people all the time, all we can do is draw attention to the facts and you've done this for four years. at some point if the justice department who actually has to do the investigations and if the

indictments are warranted they have to proceed. >> sean: are you getting any indication because you are right on the facts, the merits, and we all know, all three of us know that if the last name or trump, we'd be having a very different reaction in the media, different reaction from democrats, from big tech companies. they wouldn't be censoring it. that is, what, the corrupt world that we have to now accept exists? >> this story and the story you just dealt with with dave and corey, our great leader on the judiciary committee jim jordan as the ranking member has been asking for investigations into this issue in congress and they haven't come up. if we don't win the senate, if we lose georgia, we won't get that backstop that we need so badly. i implore the people of georgia to make sure that they vote. >> sean: jim, what do you say georgians? g

>> go out and vote for our senators. tove preserve the legacy that te great president has done in his first term. >> we aren't going to stop, by the way. yep, biden opened his mouth. or came out again. i think, kind of, emphasizes everything i've been warning about the guy. we'll play the tape. joe concha kyle, he's back. leo 2.0. where has he been? straight ahead.

>> sean: yes, joe biden had another tough day with a teleprompter, botching the introduction of his health and human services secretary nominee that he wants. take a look. >> tucker: i'm grateful to the members of my covid team. who i'd like to introduce to you now who will lead the way. i'm really proud of this group. for secretary of health and education, i nominate javier by --dash excuse me. >> sean: it's department of health and human s services. but i guess you can imagine that if president trump made a flood like thatth you'd never hear the end of it. here with reaction, he's back,

civil rights attorney leo terrel, 2.0, and joe concha. what's up with disappearing act, what's up with this i'm not available everyry night that i hear from you? what happened? you mad at us? >> is he talking to you? joe? he's talking to you. >> sean: i mean leo. joe always comes on. >> hey! i love fox, i love theit sean hannity show. leo 2.0. i don't have to be a doctor. there is something seriously wrong with joe biden's inability to remember the name or to pronounce the name of a cabinet position or his appointee, and he's not even in office yet. this is a dangerous sign to everyone that this man may not be able to make it four years. it's not tired joe or sleepy opportunitys no whatsoever. what gives me a greater concern,

is waiting in the wings is the most progressive left wing socialist. it's like, who do you choose, kamala harris -- >> sean:ty we already have that with this guy! and joe -- here's my point. and i've said this. democrats, be careful for what you. wish for. he's in the candidate production program. imagine, they get what they want. he's hiding biden and you've got president trump in exile. okay. who's going to be more interesting? it's notoi going to be joe hidi. it's going to be clear to the american people that everybody knew and they hated it. right or wrong? nu>> sean, i'll give you the number of numbers. joe biden, the guy you just saw in terms of introducing one of his cabinet members or somebody he's at leasts nominating, got 25 million more votes than

ronald reagan in 1984 when he won 49 states. think about that for a moment. that's a pretty incredible number. and rachel, called colbert,"saturday night live" gd of that material -- that's right, they won't. bottom line is that you are going to have in his first term if inaugurated, ii know there ae legal processes going on, that's why i give and if, you will have a joe biden in his 80s in his first term. ifst he goes to a second term, u talk about joe biden at 86 years old compared to the 76-year-old version you're seeing now. that should give you pause and that's why joe biden depends on a staffer to call on reporters during the rare press conference that he gives in terms of a predetermined list of reporters to call on so he stays in his safe space. this is something that should concern everybody. it's not like we are cherry picking one flaw that joe biden has. you speak in public -- this is

something that happens often and something that should give everybody pause and that this could be the next leader of the free world. >> sean: leo, last 30 seconds. >> when you compare how slow and just unable to move forward, and you look at the energy within donald trump, the man who workss 24/7, it is a scary situation. joe biden, if he gets elected, hopefully will only be a one-term president. he just doesn't have the energy as resident trump does. >> sean: let me tell you, there are going to be odds if it happens how long he would survive. more "hannity" next.

♪ >> sean: that's all the time we have left this evening. please set your dvrs so you never miss another episode of

hannity.o we will do the job the mob will never do. continue to fight for what is right. continue down that important to continue what's going on in georgia. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham joins us next. do you know what troubled my heart? i watch the episode of the restaurant owner you had on last night. i felt so bad for her. >> laura: this scene is being repeated all across the country even in states like texas where some of the most incredible restaurant tours restaurant tours of la marque establishments are going through their balance sheet at the end of the yeary and finding they e down 70%, 50%, 40%. >> they can afford to do it. they are losing everything. everything. and no scientific evidence. >> sean: new york about the shut down. >> laura: you know what the biggest lie is, restaurants