talk to your asthma specialist about dupixent. looked ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight" -- 2020 has been a tough year for a lot of americans but it's been especially difficult for the experts who claimed they analyze data for a living. aot lot of those people have ben exposed for what they are -- frauds. think of polling data, it used to seem like a legitimate job -- then came november's election despite their supposedly desiccateded modeling, posters around the country got it wrong by double digits in race after race -- pretty embarrassing -- but not as embarrassing as the performance of our so-called public health experts -- they are supposed to be numbers people too.

they told you that any public protest had roughly a 150% chance of killing the entire population, meanwhile the looting and arson totally safe. that's just basic epidemiology they said -- okay. if you're starting to get the impression that dishonest people can easily manipulate data to tell you any story they want to tell you, you may be onto something. consider the condition of our economy. the numbers out of washington suggest it's in great shape. stock prices, 401(k)s come all of risen dramatically. try to buy an expensive exercise bike or a million-dollar center console fishing boat -- good luck.t, in many cases they are sold out, there are a lot more billionaires than there ever have been in this country -- in fact as a group, billionaires have increased their wealth by 30% overall. that's by more than a total of a trillion dollars in a single year. at the same time, the unemployment rate is falling

because you hear that a lot -- so it's all good! as joe biden likes to say, we are building back better. that's one way to look at it, but look deeper. that's not a whole story. america has a different economy from the economy we used to have even just last year. people at the very top are thriving, many other americans are withering away. >> small businesses and restaurants, america's backbone are on the ropes because the coronavirus pandemic, limited foot traffic and lockdowns translate into 164,000 businesses having to close at one point since the beginning of the pandemic, with 60% having to closeit permanently. >> tucker: tens of thousands of independent businesses shut down for good, entire sectors of the economy wiped off the map. that's a lot of people out of work, so where are they? why does the federal government tell us the unemployment rate iu down? here's a simple answer, the

official unemployment numbers out of washington don't count unemployed people who have stopped looking for jobs and there are a lot of those. last month alone, another half million working age americans who want a job quit trying to find a job and that's not surprising. there are 10 million fewer jobs available in this country than there were in february, that's when politicians decided to destroy countless small businesses in the name of slowing the spread. as a result according to the a labor department, long-term unemployment has hit record levels. last month 385,000 more americans reported being unemployed for more than 27 weeks. since september, that number has increased by more than 1.5 million. what is our government's solution to the disaster they created? more money from the federal reserve -- money printed out of nowhere and backed by nothing. trillions of new dollars spent to fix a problem they created and more on the way soon. keep in mind this is stimulus

money, it's designed to help those hurt by the lockdowns and in many cases it did help and it will help, but in many other cases, the money has gone to people with the right political connections. a voter registration nonprofit run by the reverend raphael warnock running for senate in georgia raked in $482,000 in coronavirus bailout money -- how did he do that? ask. a firm that happens to be coowned by ilhan omar's husband got half a million dollars in tax money -- planned parenthood hoover duff $80 million, more abortions for everyone! the kennedy center in washington, home to the local opera got $25 million and laid off employees anyway. last week we spoke to a man called dave morris, he owns a restaurant in the midwest -- he could've used some help.no if the government shutdown his business and now he's going under. unfortunately, he is not married to ilhan omar.

he doesn't run abortion mills in black neighborhoods or invite nancy pelosi to the opera at the kennedy center. here's what he told us. >> i had some hope when they were talking eight to trillion dollar stimulus package to help the american people and when i look at maybe 120 million families in this country, 120 million households i figured i would get everybody $10,000, that's a lot of money. instead that money went all different directions, it went to campaign donors, special interest groups, may be couple museums and it didn't get where it was supposed to go -- i never got any of it and small business owners likely never got any of it, that's our money. >> tucker: itll is but here's the good news -- pretty soon it won't be worth much. the truth is you can't keep printing trillions of dollars without getting serious inflation. serious inflation is guaranteed, natural law -- there's no getting around it.

the people making these decisions know that perfectlyy well but they want inflation. that's the secret, they want inflation, in fact they need inflation, why? because they've gotten richer from death, that's the real economy. leverages their entire business model. for thehe finance class, inflatn is the only way out of all of that debt, when money is worth less, you owe less. meanwhile hard assets like upscale rie real estate at marts vineyard will be worth more. inflation may crush you but it will m make these people richer, everyone else will get the shaft. who's everyone else? regular wage earners, every middle-class retiree in the country. in fact anyone who bothered to live like a responsible person and toon save money -- all of tm will be in serious trouble when inflation arrives. that's not speculation, it'sla coming. and anyone who's paying

attention knows it's coming. that's just the beginning, if democrats retake the senate in january they have committed to passing something called the hero's act. if who are these heroes they plan to help? not the thousands of small business owners whose lives they destroyed, instead the law will help rich people in the northeast for hurt by the trump administration's last tax bill. the heroes act will restore the full state and local tax deduction reversing the 2017 law that cap it at ten grand. according to brookings institution, 96% of the benefits from this will go to the top quintile of earners, 57% would benefit the top 1% -- 25% would benefit the top .0. chuck schumer announced his support for this idea. w >> we believe that

president biden if he becomes president could eliminate the student loan debt without congress with a flick of the pen, we are proposing that the first $50,000 of everyone's student debt be automatically eliminated. >> tucker: student debt is a huge problem, the lack of benefit from going to a four year college is an even bigger problem. we pointed that out many times on this show but consider this idea -- who is helped by what chuck schumer just said to? its great news for people who got a pointless master's degrees in gender oppression, their slate will be wiped clean by chuck schumer and the magic of the federal reserve. they will be free to move forwarde in that coveted phd in transgender equity studies. what about everyone else? what about small business owners who spend 50 grand try to keep their employees on payroll over the last nine months. we'll chuck schumer wipe their debt clean? how about people with car loans or burdensome mortgages or

anyone helping to pay for their daughter's wedding, what about their debt? sorry, they are out of luck. unlike the education establishment, people like that are not big democratic donors. it would disproportionately help the most privileged in america, democratic voters but you already knew that rated here's another idea, why not make the people who benefited the most from a lockdown, people who have encouraged them pay for the effects of those lockdowns? why wouldn't you assess -- i don't know -- amazon and apple and goldman sachs and google and netflix and walmart, all the big winners in this pandemic.hy why wouldn't you assess them a one time covid fee, take it out of their record profits and makn them pay for the next bailout? why are you paying for it? jeff bezos for example is now the e richest man in the history world, maybe he could share the load in a meaningful way -- she's not sharing it with his employees.

itwhile we are at it, why not me harvard and yale and stanford and princeton use their endowments to pay off some of the student debt they caused? there is no reason ordinary taxpayers should be on the hook for their spending -- ordinary taxpayers have suffered enough. here's the bottom line, the rich are getting richer, everyone else is getting poorer. that's not a talking point, it's true, and measurable. why is it a problem? if it continues we are going to wind up with an even more volatile society in which everybody hates each other and is consumed by envy. along the way, capitalism itself will be discredited and you don't want that -- it's already happening. there's already out off a lot of socialists around these days, have you noticed that? why is that? is because the people in charge of our economy are discrediting our system. they are giving capitalism a bad name because what they are participating in is not a market economy, a free, open market

economy, it's a closed game run for their own benefit and their benefit alone. long term, this is a disaster n for all of us. not even so far in the future. in four years, sandy cortez will be eligible to run for preside president. you may laugh at sandyay cortez, she's a vacuous idiot another rich girl narcissist with an overheated twitter account but that doesn't mean she couldn't win. if we keep up with this nonsense, this economic craziness, she couldld win. ned ryan is the ceo of american majority and hens joins us tonight -- thanks so much for coming on. there's been agreement among the think tank conservatives not to talk about growing income inequality that it that that's socialism -- i would argue that ignoring it is what is bringing us socialism. >> the thing what frustrates me when many on the right don't want to call out this i guess you call i it a pastor devised

corporatist capitalism because it's not true free market capitalism -- the thing is you have to look at history. look at the turn of the 20th century when the robber barons and those consolidated and rigged the system to benefit themselves and we got the rise of progressivism which gave us the administrative state and started to do with constitutional republic, we are replaying the same thing andou allowing the people to rate the system. you talk about the consolidation of wealth, amazon with 100% increase in profits, target, walmart, 80% as we are watching tens of thousands of small businesses go out of businesses, those that are staying alive 30% reduction in revenue and we are acting like we are going to replay history. history tells us if the reaction to this abuse of crony capitalism and the robber barons was progressivism, the result of what we are seeing right now will be much, much worse i believe than progressivism andeo you're right. people might want to laugh at

aoc and the socialists but when people look at this and thinkha somehow what we are seeing is artrue capitalism, the reaction will be a strong reaction against it and god forbid -- their answer is puree socialism. >> tucker: we are going to wind up like the romanovs if we don't slow this down. >> that's exactly right. >> tucker: it is right, it's scary and it's not a joke. i watch her all the time and i think this woman is an idiot and a racist, totally self discrediting and she becomes more popular every year, why is that? there is a reason. i am for helping small business owners who've been destroyed by government order but these bailouts are going to bring us to a place where we have hyperinflation and who is that going to help and who is it going to hurt? >> exactly. at some point, government is supposed to be of, by, for the people and if we cannot have a

government with the consent of the governed, the american taxpayer, the american small business owner -- what is the point of that government? we are literally looking at a rigged system in which it is benefiting these corporations and the thing that frustrates me all the time about some of these libertarian leaning think tanks is that we as conservatives should distrust the consolidation of power whether it's bigbi government, big corporations, big tech and yet we are saying, corporations we can't do anything to them -- antitrust, break the monopoly, get us backom to it true free market capitalistic approach. >> tucker: count me in. ned ryan, it's great to see you, thank you. for the rest of this show because this is no longer an academic exercise we're going to be taking a look at what this country might become if democrats were to take complete control of the government. that's a january 5th in the state of georgia. already the democratic party is promising h more lockdowns and a

national mask mandate, how much more of this can small businesses, independent businesses, the backbone of this country -- how much more but can they take? one shaft and restaurant owner answered that question. >> do we take the pandemic seriously? of course we do, we should close out outdoor dining, every single juncture, we listen to all of the advice from theha government officials only to be shut down over and over again. there is zero scientific evidence that proves that outdoor dining is contributing to a rise in cases related to this. i can go to target, amazon is making o tons of money, bigik business is getting rich -- okay. outdoor dining does not lead to any of that. therefore, screw that, we are staying open outdoors, it's that simple. >> tucker: he's the owner and chef as well of the slap fish and seafood, great to see you. you've thought about this a lot

because it affects the life of your family -- authorities have decided it is not dangerous for us to go into walmart, a massive retailer for china and stand in an enclosed space with thousands of other people that it is very dangerous to eat an appetizer outside. where are they getting this idea? s there is no science, there is no data -- obviously that has been reflected in some of the recent rulings but still they are rulings.d by larger what this is driven by is it's driven by a special interest campaign whereby selected campaignsco continue to operatet the expense of small businesses in america. the biggest story is bad policy, the rubric by which they are locking us down. we got employees, team members, myself and family, all we want to domy is work. i appreciate all the attention that my viablee rant has gotten me and the retreats if you

will -- at the end of the day it's not just the pandemic that is unfortunately hurting people but we also have hundreds of thousands of businesses being destroyed, where is our belief? >> tucker: we've interviewed a lot ofs restaurant owners, i'm struck about how much more deeply they thought about the world and it makes me even sadder than the entire sector of the economy is being destroyed, do you think there's some reason they are targeting you? >> we are the low-lying fruit, there's a lot of posturing going on. in the absence of a complete and utteret shut down which they themselves aren't going to want to abide by -- why would they do that? taking selectively these industries and we aren't dumb, these decisions are relatively smug. they think they can normalize the hypocrisy but if i could go into costco and buy a piece of

pizza without a mask on indoors while people are literally breathing down my neck, i can't sit outside and have dinner with friendsve and family, that's a more dangerous situation. if people are going to dine out and eat outdoors, according to their own science and data, that works. >> tucker: the larger question is if they can make you do something that unreasonable, what can't they make you do? seriously. >> great question, it's normalizing a lot of this. where is the line drawn? are not the one who's going to be started a revolution on the ground, i'm trying to run a business. we look to our elected officials, you know a lot of these guys -- help us out. >> tucker: i really appreciate your coming on tonight, thank you for comingci on. democrats are already talking about an enormous new stimulus

bill. $12 trillion, cannot be, right? it wouldn't go to small businest owners, it would come out of their pockets. we'll tell you how to get this bill passed next.

♪ >> tucker: welcome back to a special edition of "tucker carlson tonight," if you're take away from the past year is that what this country needs more of his racial division, kamala harris is on the case. she is willing to spend a lot of your money to make it happen. >> proposed a bill to form a commission to study how to do reparations. >> when i'm elected president.

>> tucker: everything depends on what happens in the georgia senatehe races, those trickle o runoffs on january 5th -- if republicans lose that bill could become law. 142 members of congress have announced they support c it. one professor of public policy at duke probablyly the least impressive university in this country said that program could cost $10 trillion, that would be $800,000 per household.le and it's not exactly clear what reparations would look like, this summer a blm organizer give us a broad outline. >> they get upset when people start looting, people in this city are struggling through a pandemic so i don't care if somebody decides to loot a gucci or a macy's or a nike because that makes sure that person eats and has close, that make sure that person can make some kind of money because the city obviously doesn't care about them. not only that, that's reparations.

>> tucker: a a lot of starving naked people moving target.de larry elder is the host of the larry elder show. it kind of seems like the last thing t we need is more racial division and rage, with this fix it or exacerbate it? >> it's going to make things worse and that was the problem e of the obama administration. obama got elected with 52% of the vote, when the man walked in the oval office, his approval rating had increased to max 67%, how does that happen? it happens because america was pulling for w him because they wanted him to make a statement in the statement is we have now reached the mountaintop. some 40 years before that, mlk was giving an interview to the bbc and he said i'm surprised at the racial change that had taken place in america in the last two years. i believe it's possible in about 40 years' time we could have a black president, that is exactly when it happened and the point

is his vision at the summit of the mountaintop was a black president. barack obama gave a speech to a historically black church and he talked about how much work we have to do to realize mlk's dream and he said the generation that he referred to as the most this generation has gotten us 90% of the way there. i thought that was reasonable especially given the fact that five years earlier there was a fox opinion poll that found out 8% of americans who believe elvis is still alive. i call that the elvis factor. you take into consideration the elvis factor, a tiny percentage of americans said they would never vote for a black president, during the race between hillary and obama, between mitt romney and would you never vote for a black person, would you never vote for a female, would you never vote for a mormon, somebody who would be 72 years of age by the time he enters office referring to john mccain -- it turned out

to 5% of americans said they would never vote for a black person, 11% said they would never vote for female, 24% said they would neverev vote for a mormon, 42% of americans said they would not vote for somebody who would be 72 years old when he became president. obama had less of a disadvantagi than these three white people. can we knock it off? back in 1997, "time" magazine and cnn did a massive survey of black teens andve white teens at ask them about racism, do you think racism is a major problem in america and not too surprisingly, both black teens and white teens said yes, but then they did this -- they asked the black teams is racism a big problem, small problem in their own daily life, 89% said smaller no problem, in fact more black teens than white teens said failure to take advantage of available opportunities is a bigger problem than racism. that is 23 years ago before obama got elected let alone goty reelected, can we knock it off?

racism has never been a less problem in american life than today. >> tucker: but i bet you if you pulled on that exact same question now, you would find very different answers. you would find a huge percentage of people saying it's a bigger problem in 2 23 years ago. >> you probably would. in the 90s there was a black harvard sociologist, he is no different, he voted twice for obama -- he said america is now the least racist majority white society and all of the world, provides more legal protection and opportunity for blacks than any other country in the world including all of those of africa. separatea were a country it's gross gdp would make it the 15th largest country in the world, let's take advantage of the fact that we were hit the lottery that we were born in this country, come on. come on man! >> tucker: come on, man! it's great to see you. >> thanks for having me.

>> tucker: it won't surprise you to learn the crimes committed in the 19th century aren't the only problem is modern taxpayers are on the hook for. hurricanes, wildfires, acne, it's all your fault. we'll tell you what you owe under a joe biden administration, straight ahead.

♪ >> live from america's news headquarters. the fda authorizing emergency use of pfizer's covid-19 vaccine setting off what will be the largest vaccination campaign in u.s. history. president trump announcing the first vaccine will be administered in less than 24 hours saying it will "save millions of lives in end the pandemic once and for all." so far covid-19 is killed nearly 300,000 people in the u.s. president trump is assigning a temporary government bill into law avoiding a temporary shutdown, the legislation buying

congress time for talks, it's believed congress won't adjourn without passing a new round of pandemic relief. the short-term measure has a deadline of midnight next friday. now back to tucker carlson tonight for all of their headlines, go to foxnews.com.r: >> tucker: welcome back to a special edition of "tucker carlson tonight." the u.s. has reduced its carbon emissions more than the countries that are still members of the paris climate accord -- did you hear that? we are not in the paris climate accord but we have reduced our carbon emissions to a greater eextent than people who have signed it -- amazing. we did that with innovations like fracking and nuclear energy, not because we banned plastic straws or because someone told you to turn down the air conditioning. now browbeating the population, yelling at t the middle class fr their sin is the official platform of the party of

science -- any disagreement is now did nihilism. the entire country must look like california joe bidenas declared last year or else -- in other words it's time to nationalize blackouts. >> would there be any place for fossil fuels including coal and a fracking in a bye the administration? >> no, we would work it out, we would make sure it's eliminated. >> tucker: these people know nothing of course but you should know what would happen, exactly what would happen if we banned coal and fracking, fossil fuels entirely in this country rejoined the paris climate accord. justin haskins follows this stuffpe for a living, he's a research fellow and we are happy to have them on tonight. if we were to phase out fossil fuels and rejoin the paris climate accord, where would we be? >> it would be a total disaster, over just a 10-year period of

time, researchers at the heritage foundation found the average american family of four would spend $30,000 in extra energy costs and 400,000 jobs would be lost, about half of which in manufacturing which is a huge issue in many parts of the country including midwest -- those jobs would all be lost as a result of joining the paris climate agreement and that's not even the main thing that joe biden wants to do, he has aa whole bunch of other radical policies related to climate change -- he wants to spend a $2 trillion over his first term to retrofit 4 million buildings to make them green energy compliance -- he wants to phase out all of coal, natural gas, oil, costing hundredss of thousands of jobs and loss, production, and economic growth by 2035. he wants to make sure we have net zero carbon dioxide by 2050, that means you can kiss your gasoline powered car by, you'll

be driving an electric car for the rest of your life. even scarier, he wants a global trade war with any country including china all over the world, any country that refuses to adhere to these policies, americans would lose no matter what happens with that global trade war. there's been talk with people like john kerry and others in his administration, joining this reset movement, john kerry a few weeks ago at w an event hosted y the world economic forum -- he is to be the incoming climate czar -- the biden administration is going to join the reset movement it's going to help make sure that it is enacted in the united states. dealing with the climate crisis and doing more than the paris climate agreement would have us do is going to be the key part of it, these are incredibly radical policies that are going to cost the massive amounts of money for the average american.

>> tucker: theke people pushing this aren't ponying up their own money, they are expecting you to pay for it. let me ask you one quick question, this is always a reality check on any issue -- have you ever heard a single time a solution to the climate crisis that doesn't make the people proposing more powerful? >> no, of course not. what i love to say is that climate change is the crisis that gives the left everything it always wanted even before there was a climate crisis. the fact of the matter is there is no existential crisis caused by climate change. >> tucker: explain the last ice age before the internal combustion engine -- it's so stupid it beggars belief. nothing matters more, you hear it again and again to the left than reducing carbon emissions which are kind of a physical expression of sin. more people need more emissions of carbon, you would think

democrats would want less people, if you really care about the environment, he would be craid of crowding -- that's not the case. the science is clear, some people are naturally carbon neutral, they are just born that way. what an advantage, we'll tell you who they are after the bre break.

♪ >> tucker: welcome back to a special edition of "tucker carlson tonight." republicans weren't able to pass any kind of immigration bill over the past several years but if democrats take control of the senate on january 5th, they won't be quite as passive -- the first thing they will do is to fundamentally change our immigration system, open the borders to the rest of the world, they are tiding this -- they've been open about it for months. >> some of it is going to depend on the kind of cooperation i can and cannot get from the united states congress. but i am going to make a commitment in the first 100 days, i will send an immigration bill to the united states senate with a pathway to citizenship

for over 11 million undocumented people in america. >> tucker: is not 11 million, you would have to be 119 years old to think that, it's 20 million. the macro point is millions of americans have been looking for work so long that they've given up looking. they aren't even listed on the unemployment stats. now democrats plan to give them more competition in the labor market. who is benefiting from this? not americans. andrew arthur is the resident fellow on law and policy for the center for immigration studies, make you for coming on. who does benefit from this? >> the people who benefit from this are big business, wealthy people benefit from open f borders, essentially limitless immigration, because for them everything comes cheaper. if food is cheaper, you go to the grocery store rather than paying $0.39 for a head of lettuce, you pay $0.35, you can

get your lawn cut cheaper, but the people who suffer the most are the people who are at the margins of society, the people who we usually hear that these folks care about. d disadvantaged americans, inner-city youth, members of minority groups and immigrantsou who haven't adjusted to life in the united states yet. those are people in direct competition, those are people who enter in the united states illegally are people who don't have high levels of education, don't have a lot of work skills. there's nothing wrong with that, my father never went to college and worked in a steel mill. when you bring in a huge mass of uneducated, unskilled individuals to directly compete against americans, those americans suffer. >> tucker: it's also true at the higher end. our schools were bad before covid, now schools are shut down and kids are learning nothing -c nobody seems to care. instead of fixing that, they decided we are going to bring in more educated people from india

and china instead of doing jobs that americans aren't qualifying to do. it removes any incentive to fix american schools. >> it really does.he there is this canard that we need more stem graduates. a few years ago, the census bureau did a survey in which they find 25% of people what stem degrees were working in a stem job. computer programmers are brought into my tea people are brought in from abroad on temporary visa programs and even right now the united states congress is considering a bill that would make it so much easier for big techth to bring in those workers to replace our students that we encourage to go get tech jobs for the 21st century. those dogs aren't going to be available to them if thisil happens. these are thingsgs americans ned to think about. we've seen the quality of our own schools go down, we need to be putting more money into educational opportunities. we also need to have jobs for those students to take.

i've seen it again and again in cities across america.uc >> tucker: only 25% of stem graduates held jobs in stem, that's an amazing statistic. i appreciate you coming on, thank you. what happens if democrats don't win the senate in january? for the pastan few months they'e meen talking about starting a contingency plan to enact their agenda anyway. a huge partny of that agenda mes taking your firearms, taxing your ammunition so your gun becomes a paperweight and doing it all without a single piece of legislation flowing through congress. we'll tellll you how they plan o do that next.

♪ piano playing ♪ "what the world needs now" ♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope help now at redcross.org

♪ >> tucker: welcome back to a special edition of "tucker carlson tonight."ia

of all the euphemisms that are political class for first, it's hard to find a more sinister phrase than mandatory gun buyback. [laughs] it is not a buyback if it is mandatory, it's compensatio con. it is now the official policy of the democratic party. >> two gun owners out there who say, well, a fight and administration means they are going to come for my guns. >> bingo. you are right if you have an assault weapon. >> do you believe in the mandatory buyback of "assault weapons?" >> i do believe we have to do buybacks come and i will tell you why. there weapons of war with no place on the streets of a civil society. >> sean: yeah, soet crime rises, anyone who tries to defend their family is punished. what is thisd about? no gun fact confiscation is likely to get through congress,n if democrats control both chambers, narrowly. it's too unpopular. millions of new gun owners just

this year, you think they want their guns stolen by kamala harris? no. but that doesn't mean it couldn't happen without congress.t kamala harris has thought a lot about how to do it. here's how. >> i will give the united states congress 100e days to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws, and if they fail to do it, then i will take executive action. >> tucker: yeah, executive action. of course, she will exempt her own bodyguards. needless to say, you will keep paying for them and they will be heavily armed. how would this work come exact exactly? thought a lot about it, guns ranked activists, and we are happy to have him on tonight. >> thanks for having me, tucker. >> tucker: to realistically come when you think it is possible for a biden administration to destroy the second amendment without a vote in congress? >> absolutely, absolutely. so, the idea with the executive action that kamala harris was referring to, they can get creative with it, from the standpoint of saying, well, these t particular guns need to

live under the nfa act, an act that essentially causes you to register firearms and pay tax on them. if you can't afford a particular tax, you have to sell them back to the government at a fraction of the cost, and then that's how they will go about doing it in that h manner. i think a lot of people are not understanding that. they think if they can't get it through congress, they can find other ways to restrict, but they truly can. >> tucker: millions of americans are now gun owners. people who are not gun owners a year ago. crime, civil disorder, they need a way to protect their families. a lot of people wind up without even knowing it becoming felons under this new scheme. >> so, the biggest problem that i've had for the longest time is in my time of being a gun advocate, is how little the general public knows about the politics regarding firearms. and like you pointed out, there are a ton of people who have gone out and bought a ton of guns and don't realize that

overnight, they could literally become felons based on whatever laws that they try to pass under this particular administration when they get into office. so, the way they've done it, though, is to keep the public largely ignorant about firearm politics because they shut voices like mine down, and other groups and organizations that are pro 2, and they do the best to not talk about it and the only time they shine a light on it is when it is something negative they can utilize to push whatever agenda they are ze push.o >> tucker: if they are telling you you are not allowed to defend yourself, i mean, that should raise real suspicions about their agenda, shouldn't it? >> absolutely. but you have to understand, tucker, the whole point is control. the overall goal is control, and the most precious thing we have in this world is our life comes with a person who can control that for the defense of that is essentially in control. so i population of people that have firearms that can protect their lives adequately without having to rely on the government

isn't under the foam or control of the government, so they can take thatth from you and force u to depend on them, then they understand that they have the control at that point, and that is their ultimate goal. >> tucker: there is a reason the first two amendments our freedom of speech and religion. and the second amendment, the right to defend yourself. great to see you. >> thanks for having me, tucker. >> tucker: we are out of time. we will look back monday, the te show that is theda sworn enemy f mine, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. have the best we can with a ones you love. ♪ ♪ >> sean: welcome to "hannity." we start tonight with bad news if you believe in our constitution, if you believe in a rule of law, if you believe in

equal justice, equal application of our laws. if you believe in free, fair elections that americans can have faith in, confidence in, integrity in, because tonight, that texas suit challenging the election results in pennsylvania, michigan, georgia, wisconsin, was rejected by the u.s. supreme court, although they have original jurisdiction. they have refused to even hear the case. now remember, a very serious,