women's boys and at tammy bruce.com. filling in for laura ingraham, do i get a handoff to brian? do i get to do that? that is very exciting. brian kilmeade, have fun tonight, lots of news, donald trump is shaking things up. because this is a special edition of the ingraham angle. joe biden's inauguration just 29 days gail. 29 days until he starts doing all of the policies of president trump that you put in place over the past four years like keeping our borders closed. we will discuss that. caravans forming in honduras as we speak. we will break it down for what it means for us. as acting commissioner mark morgan trying to digest that news good he will tell us what to do. plus, guidance diversity

obsession, why is he so fixated on touting diversity for his cabinet? were talking about qualifications? what kind of cabinet secretary that might be? the latest example of the left trying to destroy the stomach are history, we will try to make sense of this. first, president trump tonight, demanding congress amends the massive spending bill the late last night, including the $900 billion covid relief bill. because they are sending back to my desk much different than anticipated. it really is a disgrace. i'm asking congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000 or $4,000 for couple. i am also asking congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from this legislation. send me a suitable bill.

>> brian: a while back. at this show changed quickly, so did everybody else's schedules. trying to make sense of it at all, chad pergram, our congressional correspondent. chad, what changed after the president's four-minute tweet video? >> almost everything here because a lot of people are worried about the possibility of a veto threat, the president does not outright threatened to veto the bill, keep in mind, the secretary of treasury was negotiating for weeks with congressional leaders, democrats, and republicans. the president was not involved in these talks. he parachuted in at the last minute here. also remember that he undercut the secretary of the treasury several times back in the summer and the fall on cost. he said he wanted to spend more than even nancy pelosi wanted to spend on this bill. you cannot amends this bill. they have to start again. they just can't go in and untucked this bill, they have to start again. let's talk about these direct stimulus checks. a coalition of liberals and some

republicans pushed for $2,000 stimulus checks. it chuck schumer and democrats spent months trying to get the $2,000 checks but republicans blocked it. nancy pelosi says, at least the president has agreed to $2,000. democrats are ready to bring this to the floor, let's do it. this also raises the possibility of a pocket veto. this is where the president could effectively veto a bill without ever lifting his veto pen. article one section seven of the constitution requires the president to sign a bill within ten days, sunday's excluded or it becomes law without his signature. if it only applies when congress is about to adjourn its session. guess what, congress is about to adjourn. that's likely to happen at 11:59 in the morning on january 3rd. when you look at that ten day window, we are basically at that ten day window, sundays excluded, right now. at the bill is not at his desk. to this is a complicated bill, they are still enrolling and

compiling this bill, probably not sending it to the white house to later this week or over the weekend here. that's the issue right there, he might not have to do anything if they got it to him this past weekend or last week, he would have to make a decision. he would sign the bill or veto it. if they send it down there at the end of the week, you are inside that ten day window and congress has to adjourn constitutionally by noon on the 3rd of january. he might not have to do anything. guess what, the bill moves. back to you. >> brian: chad, he said two years ago he did not want to sign an omnibus to bill with a bunch of in it from funding the egyptian military to pakistan diversity. again, they put it on his desk. what did they expect them to do? >> again, you have to remember this is a two-part bill. it's a massive bill, $2.3 trillion, 900 billion to move the coronavirus part, $1.4 trillion to fund the entire

federal government through next september. it was mitch mcconnell, republican leader who in november said, let's put the covid aid on the big omnibus spending bills. if that's the only train leaving the station here. those mondays that you talk about foreign agent, those are in the state department part of that massive appropriation bill. it had nothing to do with covid, but they had to blend them together. keep in mind, you have more than 90 senators who voted for this last night in the senate. more than 350 house members, this overwhelmingly passed. this is why that pocket veto was so important, they could have the votes, they would have more than two-thirds to override him if he were to veto the bill and send it back, that may not apply because of that ten day window. >> brian: also he was fired up tonight, i am sure you saw the video, nancy pelosi saw and said republicans refused to say what president trump wanted for direct payments. at least the president has agreed now to $2,000.

democrats are ready to bring this to the floor. this week by unanimous consent, let's do it. will she? >> she would have to get consent with republicans there. you have republicans generally fighting against us. there were some four, josh hawley notably republican senator from missouri teaming with bernie sanders no less. they wanted larger stimulus checks. you have other conservatives, ron johnson, rick scott from florida who said that is too far. if they didn't like the size of the bill, they thought it was too much. that's the problem right there, brian. >> brian: chad, i thought you would have an early night, it's not the case with this administration. it chad pergram, thanks much, and i appreciate it. i look forward to the next chapter. you can check in but you can never leave. thank you, sir.

senator marsha blackburn who voted no on this bill along with five other senators. are you surprised the president blew this up tonight? >> not surprised. we have worked for months on targeted relief that would meet the needs of the american people, and i talked to tennessee owens, and they want relief for small businesses, more in unemployment, money for schools, they want to get back to work, they want children back to school, they need liability protection, which is not in a spell. i think the president looked at what finally got put together and said, wait a minute, you've got all of this money that is going to give money to illegal aliens in the country, it's going to give them money retroactively. you are spending money with pakistan, egypt, renewable

energy and africa, but your money is not going to the right places, and it's not helping people that need relief. i'm not surprised at all. brian, i'll tell you, a lot of people that have looked at this bill today have said, wait a minute, i thought we were gone -- done with the days when we had to pass something so we could read it and find out what was in it. you and the appropriations bills, they say it's something you guys could have visited, but you only had a matter of hours to go through 6,000 pages. senator blackburn, do you expect to stay through christmas because a lot of stuff you are describing will run through some of it if you can pop it up in terms of foreign aid, pakistani gender diversity stuff, we have some of the other examples include the egyptian army, giving the money to buy material from russia. $86 million to cam cambodia.

also, why are we funding the smithsonian again, it still closed. the kennedy center, $40 million, it still closed. all of this stuff in the president's face. at the president knocked it out of the park. i wonder what's going to happen next. it's embarrassing, final thoug thought? >> people want to see help coming to people that have been adversely impacted by covid-19. if they hopeful that the vaccine is going to be readily available soon, but to have a piece of legislation where money is going for museums and art and foreign countries when the american people are trying to get to a point that they can recover from this, and with their lives and their livelihoods, it really was kind of -- it hit everyone the

wrong way. i'm glad it was a no vote. i want to put my emphasis on helping people that are trying to recover from the impact of covid-19. >> brian: like restaurant workers. and lockdown artist. at the mayors and the governors that just want to lock down, they have one move and they keep using it. senator blackburn, thank you so much. you voted no, one of the small numbers that voted no. despite the choices, they overlook the pitfalls of the bill to get something to working families and small businesses before the end of the year. house republican steve scalise, were you surprised the president had a four minute video where he tore this thing up and said do better and upgrade the one-time payment? >> it's good to be with you. you'll go back to lester, president trump has been frustrated with with these omnibus to bills.

he's had frustration with speaker pelosi. she waits until deadlines, if you remember just a few nights ago there was almost a government shutdown. we had to do a short-term funding bill so we can get relief for businesses, for small businesses that are dying. it those are the thing the president has been focused on. pelosi said just a few days ago she held up the relief that could have been done back in september of this year because she was waiting for a new president. those were speaker pelosi's words. all those businesses that have closed, there are a lot who have gone for good. a third of every small business and the entire state of new york is gone for good, and she held because she wanted to wait for a new president to come. you could probably see his frustration there. at the end of the day, we have to help the few businesses that are remaining.

we need to get them through this so we can get our economy back on. see when you leave it to the last minute every single year. i mean, press conference at a big call, now you can work remote. he wait to the last minute and you throw stuff together and no one ever knows what's in it, he got for christmas, people forget it. at the big question is, the president is still fighting, he believes fraud is the reason he lost the selection. chris christie weighed in with martha maccallum early. he things his time the president to throw in the towel. listen. we don't have it. basically, governor christie came out earlier, we have it now listen. still don't have it, close call. he said repeatedly he doesn't feel as though the president has made an effective case. do you believe the president should move on? >> what president trump is

pointed out something unfortunately that's gone on for decades in america. if there is voter fraud. i've seen it in her home state here in louisiana. we sent our elections commissioner to jail for fraud. the last democrat that held my seat in congress went to jail for fraud. at the idea it doesn't happen is people sticking their head in the sand. what you've got to do is focus on fixing these problems. i thinks that's what president trump has been so vocal about. some of these states, pennsylvania, their losses can accept ballots after 8:00 p.m. on election night. they accepted it for days. they stopped georgia -- >> brian: they don't see it, congressman, are you going to be one -- i heard 15 republican congressmen were meeting with the president yesterday in the oval office. it looks like they are prepared to stand up led by mo brooks and maybe jim jordan and others on january 6 when they're going to

make it official, the electoral college report, will you be part of the protest? >> i was in at that meeting yesterday. i heard about it, but in the end, i signed that amicus brief yesterday where we asked the court to go back and look at a few of these states who did thing that went outside of their law. the constitution says the electoral college has decided by the state legislatures. a number of states when around their state legislatures. through their governor, sometimes through the supreme courts. at this has to change. we have to have consistency at a minimum, we have to decide the election on election night. at this idea that in new york state right now, they are a month after the election they are still finding ballots. she was ahead by 12 and they found 55 ballots in a desk story. at this stuff has to end. if that's what president trump has been frustrated about. frankly, i think millions of people across the country are watching this going, let's not become venezuela or some third

world country, let's have consistent elections where you know what happens on election night, and people have basic rules that they follow so the integrity of everybody's vote is maintained. >> brian: part of leadership is going to have to go back maybe to square one and try to fund the government and get a covid-19 package to people that need it most. thanks, congressman. meanwhile, small business owners all across the country struggling against lockdown orders and goalposts in blue states, especially california. in san diego, first restaurants were shut down. then they reopened, then they forced them to close gun. one restaurant owner has had it. he's defying that order and joins us right now. andy davis is the owner of compass restaurant. his lawyer is here. first you, we're hearing you can open up your restaurant.

you order food, you make the accommodations, you have people come in, and then the numbers go off, not because of restaurants, and you are told to close down. why is enough enough for you, and you are not doing it? >> really with no end in sight, having close our doors and lay off our entire staff before the holidays and to be faced with the dilemma of closing our doors possibly for the last time was too much for us. he spoke at great length with our owners, our staff had the full support -- 100% of our staff wanted to reopen and have the right to earn a living and provide for our families. that's really what it came down to. >> brian: there could be 10,000 restaurant close since november. michael, right now to protect your clients, you have to make sure they don't come in and take his liquor license and his

business license could have other businesses joined in this protest was no stats to back up the closure? >> that's exactly right. he's got no medical, no science, no actual basis for taking away constitutional rights. if you're going to take away constitutional rights for u.s. citizens, they are going to be a very good, very narrow reason. that's not the case. our own state medical safety officer has said, we don't have a basis for shutting down the restaurant, where shutting down the restaurants because we want people to stay in and if the restaurants are open they are more inclined to go out. that's not constitutionally valid. >> brian: here is what the governor has said despite the judge, he got the order in your direction, then they stayed the order. here is governor making things worse, extending the shutdown. listen. >> based upon all the data and waste upon the trend lines, it's very likely based on those current trends that we will need

to extend on that stay-at-home order you recall was a three week order will be announced it a few weeks back just previewing the likelihood of those stay at homes being extended. >> brian: he's back on quarantine again. he is going to extend that order. i see you shaking your head. salons, gyms, restaurants are all in the same situation. what if they said? are they backing you? are they also pushing back? >> we got about 100 restaurants in the san diego area and we've seen this constitutionally protected peaceful protest going across the state in the country. people are standing up, they are sick and tired of it because there's no surprise to us that governor newsom extended these orders. they've had it, there are standing up and fighting for their constitutionally protected rights. >> brian: if you guys shutdown, is it over for you?

>> we all know what three weeks looks like an covid. governor says it's getting extended. it's a very real dilemma for us that if we were -- and that's what this stay-at-home could go for us. it doesn't work for our restaurant. to go does not sustain us. to go means laying off 85 to 90% of our staff, and realistically closing our doors. it's a very real possibility if this three weeks turns into another three weeks, that turns into three months, we may never be able to open our doors again. he 70 plus people that we employ will be out of jobs, and their families, it's just too much for us to take. it we wouldn't be anywhere without our staff. every small business is successful based off of their staff. they've done so much and worked so hard for us and sacrificed so

much press over the years that we have to do the same for them right now, and that's the moral dilemma that we face. >> brian: lastly, the worried about hospitals overwhelmed. what do you say to people in the medical profession saying you guys are being selfish? >> i say we are not the cause. we know the restaurants are not the ones spreading the virus. the big stores, the costco's and walmarts and those stories, they're the ones that they are tracing back the virus too. it's not a restaurant, it's not her salons commits other gems. they shouldn't be penalized for a virus that's being caused by other means. it certainly not them. >> brian: the judge ruled it was unenforceable and arbitrary and that they couldn't provide the stats to shut you down. good luck with the fight, everybody knows we are in the middle of a pandemic. you don't have to make it worse by shutting down business owners who are being responsible to

their customers. >> thank you. >> brian: thank you for the real life story. caravans are forming in honduras in anticipation of joe biden taken over. mark morgan is here to talk about what he's already seen on the job. two medical societies have strongly recommended to doctors

to treat acute, non-low back muscle and joint pain with topical nsaids first. a formulation they recommend can be found in salonpas. a formulation they recommend can be found in salonpas. salonpas. it's good medicine. hisamitsu. since you're heading off to dad... i just got a zerowater. but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff, or dissolved solids, gets left behind. our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero? yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do.

unfortunately, we are still limiting in-person appointments due to the pandemic and we'll need to move your father's visit to a later date. we're sorry.

>> on day one, i'm going to send the legislated immigration reform bill to congress, provide a road map to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants. restoring refugee admission, raising a target to a minimum 525,000 people you're in my first year. >> brian: admissions, he has pledged to undo all of trump's immigration policies. at this weekend he had a call with mexico's president when opening the borders. all of this is happening right now as new migrant caravans are forming in honduras and the anticipation of joe biden's inauguration. the implementation of his new policies, more lenient policies. it joining us now, men who just wrote about this, political editor at the federalist. john, what do you think

joe biden's immigration policies will look like. believe it or not, he's trying to break something that seems to have been fixed. >> that's right, joe biden has been pretty clear he wants to loosen president trump's more strict immigration policies and border control policies. it's everything from covid-19 precautions to asylum processes to programs like remain in mexico that have helped deter border crossings of the last year or so. just talking about relaxing these restrictions, whether or not he actually does it will trigger caravans, it will trigger increased number of people trying to get across the border. we are already seeing that across central america. >> brian: there is less fear about the coronavirus. with the hurricanes slamming through the nations, they are

marching again. we are already seeing changes at the border. >> that's right. we are also seeing smuggling networks that profit off of illegal immigration, hundreds of millions of dollars a year at least by charging federal americans for passage north over the rio grande into the united states. but they are using biden's election as a marketing tool promising people that they will be able to get into the united states more easily now that biden is going to be president. now is the time to come north. we are about to see a sharp increase in the illegal immigration on the southern border. see when you remember the catch and release policy, remember any kid who came across the border, we don't know with whom, we don't know if they are parents, i can claim whatever they want. if they have to be released into the country. we solved that problem thanks to mexico. this socialist president working tight with our president,

putting his marines at their southern border, and to remain at mexico and are the southern border. it works. >> part of the reason worked is because trump tied trade policy to border policy. mexico's president and the mexican elite care more about trade than anything. if they don't want to upset trade with the united states, they're willing to cooperate with united states on border control in exchange for this running smoothly. keeping that cooperation and keeping that department going is something that both countries have to do. >> brian: my hope is with everything on biden's plate, if biden takes over and there's no last-minute change by the supreme court, he would say it, i don't need to create this problem.

if the president solved it for now. maybe i will address that down the line. if you have that small bit of hope. thank you so much. meanwhile, we can continue. concerns to presidents immigration officials have about biden's open border policies, and what are the prices were paying right now? acting commissioner of u.s. border protection, mark, what has changed since the election? >> your previous guest is spot on. what i would add is the biden administration doesn't want to just loosen the successful immigration policies and strategies, he wants to obliterate it. his immigration strategies is an open border strategy. your previous guest outlines it, it's not that it will create additional low, it's already started. these caravans, they are creating facebook pages, using whatsapp to talk openly about

that under the biotin administration. hurry up and get there, illegally, no problem, you will be allowed in. the numbers are skyrocketing. we are between 23 and 2500 per day. those are crisis numbers. it's as you explained, because of this placement, you're able to address it. you remove those as biden wants to do, you will have chaos and crisis immediately. things are settling down, you've built 450 miles of all. you have enough money for 700 plus miles of wall, 1400 finishes it off. at this year you've got 1.3 million to continue. any indication that the new administration coming in will see the wisdom of finishing the job? biko i hope so. there's an interview today with

biden on what promised people. he's already walking back and what he promised he was going to do one day one. >> brian: i have that sound bite. i can play it for you right now. >> we started discussing these issues with the president of mexico and our friends in latin america. i will accomplish what i said i will do, much more humane policy based on family unification and requires a lot in pace, it requires funding in place, including asylum judges. it's going to take not day one, it's probably going to take the next six months to put that in place. the one used to work for president obama, what is he saying? >> he's not going to do what he promised he was going to do on day one. he's been very clear all along during the campaign, all he was going to do to our dominic it

will pale in comparison with those first few weeks. good thing is, if listening to the experts. they are warning him, he can't do what he promises to do. he's not changing his policies, he just kicked the crisis can down the road a few months. we can stop deportations. he is deleted a little bit. see when they follow our news as soon as they break it. that's one thing i've learned and following you. i saw the crisis, he couldn't put it fast enough to house all of the incoming illegal immigrants coming to our country. he finally got it under control, breaking up to see it might be all going backward. thank you so much, i appreciate the work you've done, i appreciate the conversations we've had.

coming up straight ahead, is joe biden filling his cabinet on the basis of diversity instead of quality? we go inside the numbers and the names.

>> i promise you, you will see the most diverse cabinet representative of all folks, asian-americans, african-americans, latinos, lgbtq, across the board. >> brian: what is the obsession that the democratic party has about diversity? he's more fix it gated on that than the qualifications. it seems like he's trying to check off boxes. here's how he introduced pete buttigieg, former mayor of south bend, as his transportation secretary by listing the diversity of his other picks. >> the first ever woman, the first black woman, the first

woman of south asian dissent as vice president. at the first ever black secretary of defense, the first ever latino head of the dhs, and the first ever latino head of hhs. the first ever openly gay nominee to lead the cabinet department, and one of the youngest cabinet members ever. see you and if you have time, squeeze in their name. if you have time. dinesh d'souza's here. we like and because of his billions, not because of your background. this is embarrassing. he goes through these picks and says, i've got to tell you why i picked you, not because they are really smart and qualified, it's your background, the color of your skin. is this a step backwards for america? >> it's absolutely terrible. normally you would want to pick a team based on qualifications alone. well, i don't think in principle there's anything wrong with saying i want to reflect the diversity of the country. look, this is a hugely diverse country in terms of religious

diversity, cultural diversity, regional diversity, intellectual diversity, ideological diversity -- biden wants none of that. in fact, he wants uniformity in those categories, and to the only categories that mattered to him our scale and color and gender and sexual orientation. what does that have to do with being a defense secretary or secretary of transportation, nothing at all. >> brian: that's good point. i would also like to add this. if you are african-american, i have a sense that may be not every african-american agrees with al sharpton or colonel allen west. why label them that way because it's in the insult, i think, to people of color or people of gender. speak of the democrats have built their whole politics on identity politics. they want to create a majority coalition of these victimized

groups. at that go beyond the normal calculus. it breaks gives you one point, gender gives you one point -- but if you are black woman, you get two points because your race and gender. it's almost like you cut this bizarre calculus -- you here in joe biden's place. you got one over here and one over here, but a two over there. it's almost as if they have now become so obsessed with all of this that they basically think that every individual is reducible to their skin color, their gender, and their organs. >> brian: nice way to put it. msnbc underlined this issue, i think, brilliantly. let's watch how they went about and talked about diversity in joe biden. >> we need to make sure that this is a cabinet that has a secretary in this cabinet that is asian-american >> it makes sense that attorney general would be a black person. >> within our diversity, for us is going to be very important to

see latina in the cabinet. >> brian: now you know where he gets it. he's answering to them. >> he's answering to them, and the phrase the people keep using is looks like america. my problem is with the word, looks. looks. if there after a cosmetic at diversity, a diversity of appearances, not a real diversity of thoughts or ideas. if that would actually contribute to bringing new perspectives into government. that's not what joe biden is after at all. >> brian: kamala harris as you know as the vice president elect. she's going to vacate her seat as senator of california. he is going to be the first latino senator from california. if they say it's a victory for working families across the great state, and assume they think the hispanic coul familiee the only ones who can work. the mayor of san francisco says

naming padilla is a real blow to the african-american community. we don't know about him yet, but we note the color of his skin bothers some people and tartans others. >> how terrible it is in the country we have to be reducible merely to our ethnic heritage. our ethnic identity is who we are. i'm an immigrant from india, part of me is that. that's not the whole of me. to try to predict how i think and feel, what my politics are based upon just looking at me, this is the kind of outrageous munition of people's individuality and what truly makes them diverse. >> brian: is this a step backward for our country? is this the last gasp for -- before america becomes a melting pot where it doesn't matter your background and heritage, just that you're an american quest mike step forward or step back? >> with a tight slap in the face

to martin luther king. although we venerate him every year, the simple fact is that the left has completely and completely abandoned and betrayed his ideologue g. talks about an america where we get beyond the race, where we are color-blind, where we judge people by the content of our character, and you have to listen to joe biden to talk to realize he represents the antithesis of what he stood for. >> brian: thank you for putting it in perspective, have a great week. >> thank you. >> brian: coming up straight ahead, the left will stop at nothing to erase america's history. now they are going after abraham lincoln, and they don't stop there. davis hanson is here to make sense of it all.

♪ fighting cancer doesn't start here. not in tubes or bags. not in scans or scribbles. fighting cancer doesn't even start in a lab. the truth is, fighting cancer starts with you. covid has devastated our funding for lifesaving research. help us help patients. donate today.

>> brian: more appeasement of the radical left from coast-to-coast. you want an example? washington, d.c., robert e. lee statue was removed to san francisco, get this, a school district renaming committee is trying to strip the name abraham lincoln from a high school because black lives didn't matter to him enough. joining us now, victor davis hanson. he's a senior fellow.

a picture, 43 names, some of which are from our founding fathers being ripped off buildings, but lincoln, he didn't care about black lives enough? >> this is the president, remember, that took an army of 2 million northerners, it was about 1 out of 11 people in the north at the time, 2 million of them. his goal was to not just stop slavery, but to destroy it and to destroy slavery he destroyed the confederacy. 700,000 americans died. you are you equating him with lee, what do they have in common to this revolutionaries? their crime if they are both white, and they are both male, and they are both dead because they conflated the two. they don't tell us, who are they going to replace it with? even if they have -- even if they want to make according to their value judgment, one makes

you completely bad. maybe cesar chavez, he sent thugs to the border to beat up immigrants trying to cross illegally. every single person they would replace them with, i could find a flaw according to their logic, one fog, negates your entire essence. this is the craziness were dealing with. remember 1984, winston smith says, he who controls the path controls the future. he who controls the present controls the past. it that's what they're doing, they are trying in the present all of our references in the past. thanksgiving, christmas, the constitution, therefore, they think they can have a new future based on their own values that have nothing to do with the very rights and prosperity and security they enjoyed from a system that they apparently despised. >> brian: it's unbelievable to you, you want to examine it, you

don't want to judge it. jeremiah jeffries is a first grade teacher who is leading this motion. they didn't like the way he treated native americans. for james munro, we don't win the war of 1812, thomas jefferson, he had but he also is indispensable in the formation and continuation of our country. it's a little scary to think. also, we understand, too, we have a brand-new squad member in congress. he says, i believe our current system of capitalism is slavery by another name. if that's congressman bowman. if that's the next generation of lawmakers judging our economic system and our country. your final thoughts? >> mr. bowman should realize that until the covid lockdown, we had the lowest african-american unemployment east diamond history, 5.5. we had a median family income

near $50,000 per year. blacks in america were wealthier than any of those of african descent anywhere in the world. he's got to give us the ultimate paradigm. is it north korea, is that the socialist utopia of venezuela? is it the e.u. that has $25,000 less per capita income than we do? you can't find anything other than just to say, you know what, i'm pretty affluent, and pretty free, there's a lockdown -- donald trump from i hate him. therefore i can say whatever i want and get attention. i feel sorry for those people. >> brian: i appreciate it. more on the covid-19 release build. a more breaking, coming your w way. and if you don't have insurance, it's free. plus, get 20% off your treatment plan.

enjoy flexible payment options and savings when it matters most. we're here to make your smile shine bright so you can start the new year feelin' alright. call 1-800-aspendental 7 days a week or book today at aspendental.com - i'm szasz. [norm] and we live in columbia, missouri. we do consulting, but we also write. [szasz] we take care of ourselves constantly; it's important. we walk three to five times a week, a couple miles at a time. - we've both been taking prevagen for a little more than 11 years now. after about 30 days of taking it, we noticed clarity that we didn't notice before. - it's still helping me. i still notice a difference. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.

>> so we end with some breaking news. moments ago the house democrats so they will try to approve the $2,000 stimulus check pushed by president trump about two hours

ago so a christmas miracle may be on the horizon. and guess what, unless senator josh hawley and lindsey graham's in her account have been hacked, they are ready. meanwhile, that's it for me tonight. brian kilmeade filling in for laura ingraham on the ingraham angle. if you want more of me onto wooden, watch fox news from six until nine in the brian kilmeade show. shannon bream knows that quite well, she's on on every single weekend. she donates her intellect and background to our audience and for that i respect, and thank you shannon. >> shannon: listen, i'm honored just to spend time with you in whatever way that i can brian come and if that means calling into your radio show, count me in. now i got a question with all this breaking news. this deal of 2,000 more dollars, will they do with the rest of what the president said which was cut out all this other stuff like the billion dollars