our time here is limited no matter what we do so there's no reason to be grim all the time. we're going to try our best not to be. in the meantime, great news.s. we are turning this over to our friend in new york, she and hannity takes over. kes over. >> sean: i like the idea of being happy. we've been through a lot in the >> sean: i like the idea being happy. tough times ahead and better days, no doubt. we know who's in charge ultimately. thank you, tucker. welcome to "hannity." i know this country has been through a rough couple of weeksl frankly a rough plus year. tensions are high. in the port and for everybody to back, take a deep breathta collectively. yes, america has had tough days, difficult moments in this country, and we will get through this. we will find our way peacefully, diligently. one glorious nation under god as

presidential candidate joe biden,d he vowed to unite e country. promise to cool off the red-hot political climate and work to bring americans together. well, wasn't exactly clear when he was comparing ted cruz to joseph goebbels, and they want to put you all back in chains, but that'sit his history. it's perfectly clear that nothing can be further from the truth. democrats, i don't see any interest in any unity in any of them. after years of them saying the most violent things against the president, harassing his supporters, excusing as they did this summer some of the most violent moments in american history, inn american cities, saying little or nothing were making excuses or denying what our own eyes showed us, after hawking one conspiracy after ally toco another. any desire to say you are wrong in this, we apologize, don't

hold your breath for using what happened last week, we all saw the despicable violence at the capital, we saw what ensued in that time. what they are planning it is downright chilling. it's to a point, if you have an honest disagreement with at republican, oh, or if you like donald trump, if you like donald trump's tax cuts, judicial appointments, trade deals, beating isis, soul you likethe mid eastern piece d, energy independence, like the border wall that president has built, all right, a lot of people like all of that. that may surprise democrats. yeah, that's why 79 million people voted for the president.i according to some democrats, if you have any questions or supported even an audit, look what democrats want to do.

look what benny thompson suggesting, senator ted cruz, senator ted cruz is a principled conservative harvardto educated lawyer, alan dershowitz has said probably the best student he ever said. or josh hawley. that fact that they wanted an audit that they now say could be classified, they could be classified as domestic terrorists and the put onto a no-fly list because they supported attending audit? keep in mind, senator cruz, senator hawley wanted to ensure the integrity of our elections. reading the polls where 83% of republicans according to gallup didn't like the results. i guess be banned from any commercial flights, that would be insane. that is called overreach and that would be would be fundamentally unfair. if we apply the same standards based on things maxine waters said and many other democrats, we'll remind you if you like to

know, not one single republican lawmaker ever i heard ever wouldn't want to riot, nobody wants that. every single conservative, they condemned immediately what happened at the capitol, we condemn to those people all summer long breaking the law. some in democrat a party that don't want to acknowledge any of that. instead you have people on the left and people like sherrod brown now demanding that cruz and holly resign immediately. they are allowed to stand up for their opinions. are we all supposed to think exactly alike or if you have a disagreement? it was basically a two hour debate, if, in fact, they were able to get there and there are enough democrats and republicans to stop it. after the debate which was happening, it's part of our process. democrats have done it themselves in years past.

other elected democrats, they want to use the 14th amendment to kick lawmakers out of congress. this is all because a few republicans lawfully requested an emergency audit. democrats, they have opposed the sitting of electors too. they did it in 1969, they did it in 2000, they did it in 2004, they did it in 2016. democrats did the same thing! in prettytt much every recent presidential election that republicans won, democrats did it. maxine waters challenged the results over the russia hoechst in 2016. we talked about putting her on a no-fly list? what is the standard here? what is a standard -- we can't have a double standard, going to stand consistently. waters didn't promote violence orce self in her own words agait the president of the united states. anything happened to her? not that i recall. take a look.

>> don't seat anybody in that cabinet from a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you g get out and you tell them they are not welcome! i am sitting here listening, watching, absorbing, thinking about -- even though i never met him, and with this kind of inspiration, i will go and take trump out tonight. [cheers and applause] >> seems very excited. what if any republican said that about joe biden or kamala harris can you say she was inciting violence on the president? was she encouraging an insurrection, where are the democrats that want the whole donald trump who did say at the

rally, you can march peacefully at the capital, what about joe biden, telling me punching out the president of the united states. in case joe forgot as he gives his big civility speech? d speak with the press were asking don't you wish i was debating him? i wish i could so i could take him behind the gym. i did make a mistake. they asked me what i like to debate this gentleman, i said no, i i said i'd beat the hell t of him. >> sean: what is this behind the gym thing? if any conservative, any republican talk about assaulting joe biden or kamala harris, president of the united states, vice president, whatever it is, if they did it inn front of a crowd on camera, what would happen? what would democrats say then?

shouldn't this same standards apply to democrats? onthat's our point. c she made these comments on june 18th. two weeks after farr left riot ors burned a minneapolis police station to the ground just two weeks after violent rioters tried to storm white house grounds. here's what kamala harris said then. i wonder if donald trump would've said this. take a look. >> this is a movement, they are not going to stop, and everyone be aware of it, they are not goingg to stop before election day november and they are not going to stop after election day and that should be, everybody should take note of that on both levels. they are not going to let up. they should not. >> not going to stop, take note of that. not going top. stop, we are not going to stop. what? given the hundreds of real riots

that took place over the summer, over 200 police officers injured, so much violence, vandalism, arson. okay, let's ask any republican like mitch mcconnell, is it okay what kamala harris said they are? what did you do there? what did you say then? it's not going to stop, it shouldn't stop? what did all that mean? all i'm really asking is a simple innocent question. this is a question. do you find those comments out of line? by the way, what about hollywood actors and actresses? they seem to love all things radical democratic socialist.te let's listen to some of their rhetoric. >>ow let's say the things he do, of course i wanted to punch him in the face. [cheers and applause] >> yes, i have thought an awful lot about blowing up the white house. >> this sleep

[bleep] idiot is the[bleep] pre. >> trump needs to be medicated and hospitalized. s >> "julius caesar" dress like you've never seen before, a man dressed like donald trump stabbed to death on stage. >> when's the last time and the nactor a president? >> sean: every american can ask themselves an honest question. is there one standard for president trump? is there one standard for kamala harris, joe biden, other democrats, pretty much everyone else? according to many, the lawful act of challenging the election results, and audits, audits, and a ten day audit is treasonous, going to be on the no-fly list. congressman ted lieu leading this impeachment charge, suing for civil unrest in the streets, called for it. now he's calling for the fbi to investigate the president, the

president'sde attorney, and members of congress were inciting an election. many worrying that terrorism bill sponsored by dick durbin could be used to pacify futureme trump rallies as domestic terrorist events. you can't make this up. see what's happening? democrats are attempting to cancel, silence anyone and everyone they disagree with. 99% of donald trump supporters, you know what? look at the rallies that were mostly peaceful. they were good, honest, hardworking peace-loving americans that go toto work, ply by the rules, obey the laws, pay their taxes, raise their kids, they want tax cuts, less bureaucracy, secure borders, energy independence, no social justice activists, pretty simple.mp according to the left, that would make all of them new domestic terrorists.

an op-ed. in forbes demanding that companies blacklist anyone who worked in the trump administration. new york republican congresswoman elise stefanik was actually removed from harvard'st senior advisory committee. why? for raising her concerns about the election.. and of course, silicon valley is playing a massive role in this political purge. twitter band at the president of united states for life. facebook actively removing election integrity content. anybody who has a different point of view, almost everyone in big tech is attempting to silence the free speech platform known as parler. the biggest gun forum in america kicked off the internet without explanation by godaddy. e i fear this is only the beginning because now the incoming president joe biden has given a green light to his counsel culture loving base and according to joe, his political

rivals deserve to be canceled because, well, i'll let him say it in his own words. >> the way ted cruz and others are dealing with this, how they are responsibleel as well -- >> do you think some of them should resign? >> i think they should be beaten the next time they run. i think the american public has a really good clear look at who they are. they are part of the big liar. i was being reminded by a friend of mine, maybe you were with them, i can't recall, we are told that global's in great lie, you repeat the lie, repeat the live. >> was the trump >> sean: was it a big lie when they usey the was the fisa court lied to you when it says that they had been

able to confirm everything and, you know, they testify it washe true to the best they acknowledged? turns out none of it was true. you know what question mike they didn't verify any of it. verify, wasn't verified. is that a bigig lie? given this kind of rhetoric, is anybody surprised that democrats are attempting tooc ram through? they will push through their bogus impeachment tomorrow with only seven days left in the trump administration. according to constitutional scholar democrat jonathan turley, no fan off the presiden, they didn't like the president's speech on the sixth, he calls it a snap impeachment that would damage our constitution. harvard law professor alan dershowitz said to impeach the president for exercisingg his first amendment rights would be dangerous to the constitution. he will join us. house leader kevin mccarthy, by the way, told us in spite of

this "new york times" piece that came out, said no he does not support the impeachment charade, does not want the president to resign, and he emphasized that he had been advising members repeatedly throughout the lastt few days that impeachment, yes, is a horrible idea. by the way, we did speak to senator mitch mcconnell's office tonight and we looked at what they said. the headline is "mitch mcconnell said he's pleased about impeachment. i think they supportively had change the headline because they said, no, there is no conclusions that have been made and there is a lot of salacious nonsense in this, meaning "the new york times" piece. that be maggie haberman and jonathan martin. i just spoke to mitch mcconnell's office. i spoke to kevin mccarthy directly. meanwhile, west virginia senator joe manchin calling impeachment "an ill-advised political ploy was cool. take a look. >> is there any scenario you see

that the u.s. senate would try and convict president trump? >> i don't see any of that. i think the house should know that also. we've been trying to send that message over. they know the votes aren'tl there. i think this is so ill-advised for joe biden to be coming in trying to heal theom country, trying to be the president of all the people and we are going to be so divided and fight again. >> sean: good for senator joe manchin. might be the only democrat not hell-bent on vengeance and might be looking out for the best interest in our country. just to recap, political purposes are trying to censor opinions that they disagree with. they are demanding that companies not hire former white houseme staffers. they want to designate people that supported and audit them a ten day audit, domestic terrorists so they'll end up on a no-fly list of commercial airlines.

they are gleefully ramming through another pointless impeachment in the house. predictable. and the leader of their party is comparing conservatives, yes, to not sees. these are the actions of people who claim they are going to reunite america! of course, that's not true. unfortunately, today's them a credit party not interested in unity. instead they are driven by what is beyond a pure hatred for president trump, his supporterso they have done this over four and a half years the day donald trump and melania trump came down the escalator in trump tower. here is my i promise to you, we are going to hold them all accountable. we are going to call out the remarks, their hypocrisy, duplicity, their double standards. unlike other media mob outlets, we are going to be and remain independent. we are not controlled by the democrat party. we are not going to be silenced. tonight, as we said at the top, i want everyone in this country to take a deep, collective breath. they'll have their big

impeachment party tomorrow, and you know what?no it's been a rough year plus, but guess what? the world needs a strong america. remember, we can be, capable of it, one glorious nation under god in spite of some political and philosophical disagreements, we will find our way. sometimes verbal combat, it all works out in the end. joining us with more, former acting director of national intelligence ric grenell along with hungry men devin nunes'. i'll start with you tonight. let's talk about the double standard. you are actively involved andd you are proven correct on the big russia hoax lie that went o for years, nobody seemed to want to take responsibility for that. to this day they never admitted they did anything wrong and the lies they spread even about you. now you see where the democrats are heading. tell us -- how do conservatives react to this?

>> i think people need to stay in the site and they have to stay involved in the government. what's happening here is reminiscent of the fall of the soviet union where you have the democrat leadership, they are all very old, being challenged by these insurgents, these revolutionaries who are bringing communism into the democratic party. so the american people are vigilant about this. that's y why you saw the crackdowns, you saw earlier, the elimination of an entire company, parler, the only free social media platform conservatives can go to, that's been obliterated. they are doing a lot in the dead of night around here, sean. this is the first time, here in the rotunda, typically there is been one or two cameras through all of the covid time, every single spot is virtually full. i haven't seen that in a year since the last impeachment. what happens as american people aren't getting the truth, they get on social media and they are not free to express their

feelings and you have the rest of these clowns around here that are outputting this poison out to the american people when you are exactly right -- look, the president makes a lot of mistakes. the bottom line is to do a snap impeachment has real consequences.. i'm not joking. when you talk about the fall of the soviet union, they startedow to crack down. they started to crack down on people and that's what you see here. they are not allowing republican's comment, now we have to go through magnetometers was something you tonight, as if we arey criminals. i think we are in a very dark place. the american people need to stay in touch with their elected officials and express their frustrations. >> i'm looking at this. okay. ten day audit, no-fly list, you are a domestic terrorist. devin nunes, who made good comments along with

maria bartiromo. there is a suspension of parler, conservative voices silenced on social media, left to right, sideways. massive donations by these big tech companies to the democrats, not to republicans. it seems chilling to me what is happening and the ones thatg ae opposing the freedom of speech the most are the people that i thought had a monopoly on freedom of speech. >> look, sean. i think it's chaos inll washington, d.c., right now. but i'll tell you the good news is that most americans really aren't payingon attention. they aren't seeing the relevance of what's happening. they recognize that joe biden won and they are looking towards january 20th, 8 days from now in order to have a new president. they aren't thinking that there should be impeachment. they are not thinking that

social media should be shut down for conservatives, the attacks, the weaponization. this is washington's way of being vindictive and i have too tell you, most people outside of washington, d.c., look at this and they say, this is why we hate washington. this is why we hate the politicians where they seem to always want to fight rather than be in a position where we should be looking forward. our country has just been through a terrible economic shut down because of covid-19. we need to get back on our feet. small business owners are dying to get open and yet we have politicians who are rushing through and impeachment. the president is leaving in eight days. joe biden will be president in eight days. this is nonsense. washington, d.c., politicians need to stop. >> i wish... they've got a week from tomorrow, devin nunes.

what is your message to, say the leadership in the senate? mitch mcconnell probably has the full say. he did pull back when we called his office tonight and he said, no, let me give you exact words. he said that in fact, he was very clear about it, it wasn't true and that it was a lot of salacious nonsense and what "the new york times" was saying. so he was pretty clear on all of that. your take?l >> i believe ambassador grenell made a good point. people need to get out of this washington, get out of the power-hungry bubble where they have these old leaders wore decrepit making mistake out of their mistake and get out with the real people. i returned back from my district in the rural part of california. you've been out there before. people are upset with this but they don't like what happened in the capital last weekne but they haven't like what's been going on with the riots all year. they haven't liked what's been going on with this administration. you had joe biden, pelosi

accused donald trump, me and everything else for being secret russian interests when they themselves have paid for it and gotten it fromom russians. the first time the last few days, i have people coming up to me that i've never come up to me before and said, what on earth are you guys doing back there? and even if people who don't support the president say, look, i don't like what he did, but why would you impeach him? he is almost gone. people don't understand any of this nonsense. >> sean: thank you both. c exclusive interview with elise stefanik, what's happening to her. alan dershowitz saying congress does not have the power to hold a trial after an official left office. steve scalise will join us, much more breaking news and james o'keefe, new video, this time we'll let you know what certain people at pbs think about you. it'll shock you. straight ahead.

these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the services of the post office plus ups only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

>> joining us now is congressman elise stefanik. harvard just remove her from their advisory committee because she dared to talk about her views on the election. congresswoman, thanks for being with us. it's a pretty prestigious position. we watched four years conservatives aren't even allowed to really speak on college campuses. it's fairly common. wanted to get your reaction to it, what were the specific reasons given? >> first of all, thank you, sean, for what we see more and moreon cold universities across this country, places of high higher education should be places ofrn learning, discourse, freedom of ideas and we see the move in the

opposite direction becoming more intolerant. there good reasons given to me were because i stood up to object the electoral college, the electors of specificallyk from four states. i stood up on behalf of my district and specifically talked about the constitutional questions that are at play? these are valid questions about governors, judges, secretaries of state not following state election laws. really at the end of the day, d harvard made this decision because of the pressure from the far left. there was a phase petition and they told me to resign twice. absently not, i will not resign because my job is to stand up for my district and we should welcome conservative students, but harvard purge the only trump voter on the harvard is due to politicsol and what's frustratig to me is the people who are hurm the most are the students, the next generation of leaders where they are taught their views will be silenced if they don't agree with the majority of the far

left talking point at harvard. it's a a shame. >> basically one point of view that you are allowed to have at harvard? i would think at that the you would want to most challenge yourur preconceived notions, mae opinions, may be if people would listen to the other side they might actually learn a thing or two? >> absolutely! college campus it should be venues where you challenge one and a there, what you foster critical thinking, what you get different perspectives. what is so unfortunate is when i was an undergraduate at harvard, i was deftly the minority pay conservative student, first generation college student, but it's becoming harder and harder and it shows utter disdain for people that don't come from the liberal bubble, people that don't grow up with parents who were in academia, parents who are in far left politics.er i'm concerned about the president that's this isoi

setting. this isn't going to t be me, ths is going to be about banning fellows,th professors, students from speaking up their belief. i've been overwhelmed by the positive feedback i've heard not just for my district but from alumni of harvard who vehemently disagree with their attack on freedom of speech. i feel most bad about the students who are young conservatives who are looking for role models that they can reach out to. it is clear that harvard wants to purge anyone who supports president trump, and another petition already under way not to allow public speakers or anyone who served in the trump administration. >> sean: thank you. i hope another college has interest in both sides. hire somebody on the left -- let the students decide for themselves. thank you, congresswoman. sorry that happened. we are learning also tonight that senator tim scott will not

support this last-minute impulse impeachment and as alan dershowitz explained the, the legislature doesn't have jurisdiction to impeach a president afteraf he's already left office whicho appears to e the plan. here with reaction, house minority whip's steve scalise, here harvard law professor, alan dershowitz. i spoke, steve, to your leader kevin mccarthy earlier tonight. he was very, very, very clear. that is that he doesn't support the president resigning. he doesn't support this. impeachment, and that he has said so in two letters that he is sent out to members saying it's a bad idea which renders "the new york times" wrong again. >> sean, it's good to be with you. look, this is a very divisive move from the speaker to try and

really divide the country even more at a time we should be focused on bringing it together. there is a powder keg out there you've seen for months. this isn't something to happen w wednesday. what happened wednesday is disgusting. everything a person who storm the capital and attacked capitol police who did a heroic job, those people should be put in jail and they are being put in jail, by the way. by the way come you didn't hear the left decrying the kind ofvi violence we saw during the summer so clearly they are trying to play this both ways. we are not. we are saying it's wrong wednesday, wrong during the summer, but to impeach the president one more time, they impeach him over a hoax the last few years, all they are about is dividing the country that timese we should be focused on ratcheting the tone down, it's not that right now.ro >> sean: professor dershowitz, a new york had line is mcconnell seems to be pleased about impeachment there they have now since changed their article, apparently.

at least they were scheduled to change it. they said they would change it according to senator mcconnell's office which i talked to before airtime. he said, there have been no such conclusions and there's a lot of salacious nonsense. let's talk about, you know, assuming the house tomorrow goes through with yet the latest edition of their never ending desire starting 16 minutes after donald trumpe became president, the media and the democratss wanting this, what happens then? i don't see the time to mount a defense would be possible. but i guess democrats are capable of finding and a way to doy whatever they want, right? >> first of all, let me comment briefly on harvard but harvard is not only going after conservatives, there were petitions to remove my professor emeritus status because i defended president trump on the floor. a petition signed by 5,000 professors and students at harvard and yale trying to

disbar senators cruz and the other senator because they went on the floor of the senate. it's getting worse.e. if a student today takes a position that i take or the congress woman takes, their grades will suffer, the recommendations will suffer. we are seeing a kind of mccarthy's and perm yet, the reverse mccarthyism, the exact opposite i experience when i was in college in the 1950s. what the democrats are doing now is they are playing theater. they know who they can't get the removal of a president. the constitution only empowers congress to impeach and remove a president from office. once he's out of office, congress loses jurisdiction. they can't have a trial. first of all, the constitution says -- >> sean: wasn't there a case -- >> a trial of the president. >> sean: wasn't there a case of the grant administration impeached post term, did not

happen? >> yes.. it was wrong then and it's wrong now. people made aad mistake in the past. the constitution makes it clear, you can only remove via two-thirds vote. if you then remove, you can also disqualify. but you can't just disqualify. that's not possible under the constitution. it would be unconstitutional top impeach the president, then put off the trial until after he leaves office and he's an ordinary citizen. if they can do that, sean, they can impeach you and me because we couldn't run for president in 2024. >> sean: i would impeach me.re it would be a great favor so we never do run. goodbo to see you both. when we come back, prominent former demo criticro senator jut filed as a foreign agent and the left peter schweizer, david rubin, and the latest undercover video from our friends at project veritas. yes, the people of pbs, one of

their lawyers doesn't really like people that don't think like him much. we'll show you straight ahead.

♪ piano playing ♪ ♪ “what the world needs now” ♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope help now at redcross.org

>> sean: anotherer democrat tonightt embroiled in a scandal over cozy ties with china. the biden inaugural committee returning donations from former senator barbara boxer after it was revealed she registered as a foreign agent for a chinese surveillance company which is linked to the spying and targeting of the minority muslim population in china. as reported by buzzfeed news over the summer, china has built massive new prisons and interned in camps as part of their mass attention of muslim minority groups and was considered one of

the worst human rights abuses anywhere in the world today. following the backlash, boxer or not she no longer do any work for the company calling it a negative distraction. here to explain, author of "profiles of corruption," journalist peter schweizer. host of the "rubin report," david rubin for you and you before anyone else? >> that's right but we met a couple weeks before it became public. >> okay. we do that first interview, i think it's generate 20th, secret empires. in that book, you talked about burisma, talking about oligarchs in russia. becausees luck oligarchs, shoppg sprees, all the stuff. my question is this. is there a lot on this laptop

because democrats like to talk about impeachment. are these issues going to be something that democrats come to regret, the financial problems, the other issues i hear that might be involved here that bad, >> yeah, they are. actually we are going to those emails, sean, and there are ag lot of deals involving a lot of foreign entities. it's very corrupt behavior. the announcement that barbara boxer was actually going to do lobbying work for a company that is central to the chinese national security state apparatus is emblematic of thehe problem we have in washington, d.c. politicians aren't always for sale but a lot of them are for rent. the bidens have had a long cozye relationship with foreign f entities, foreign governments, particularly china, and those just don't get swept away. those relationships linger, the

money flow continues, and any leverage those foreign powers might have with the biden families still exist to this y.day. yes, there's going to be more reporting going ahead by us. >> business and personal things in a really bad a scale 1-10, give it a grade. >> i'd put it at a nine. i don't think we've ever had an american president that has been this commercially linked to our chief adversary which is china. look, it's obvious to everyone. look at donald trump, he had f some dealings, his family had dealings s. we look at michael bloomberg, same thing. he had dealings in china, legitimate businesses. by no stretch of any imagination to the bidens have any kind of legitimate business that the chinese were pouring money into. he was about currying favor. the bidens got millions and the

bidens didn't care that it put them in this compromising position and there's going to be much more reporting on this by us in the future. >> sean: dave rubin, i look at all of this and i'm listening to listening to the media mob and we are actually going to put them in nice little spins and sections. t i just think there might be very dramatic shifts in opinions on these issues in the months and maybe years ahead. maybe sooner. >> people have just had it, people have had it with the swamp. it's really as simple as that. a good one, the biden have no business in china. trump has business in china, that'sna a good point. but the situation with barbara boxer, she was a senator for 24 years, she's 80 years old. it's like them i just retire. why at 80 years old as if she's not a millionaire taking money not from a chinese sneaker company but a chinese surveillance company?

these people, they work in government, they don't do much except get rich and then they work for the lobbying companies. we all know this. this is why trump won the first time around because he promised to drain the swamp and this is why the swamp at this very moment we see the swamp reconstitute itself and get rid of whatever is remaining of trumpism, this is the gross thing that makes people hate politics and we really need to rethink it because it's not working anymore and people can see it too easily now. they've seen it and are going to continue to see it. >> sean: great work, both of you. when you come back, project veritas, exclusive tape. exposing pbs's outright hatred of you straight ahead.

to defend against dark forces attacking your organization, you need to see in the dark. to have the wisdom to understand multiple cyber threats. the precision focus to end attacks instantly. on computers, mobile devices, servers and the cloud. join the world's leading companies in our mission to defend. cybereason. end cyber attacks. from endpoints to everywhere.

>> sean: a >> i knew undercover video released earlier today showing a pbs lawyer saying that trump supporters need to be put in reeducation camps while also celebrating americans dying of coronavirus in red states, trump voters. fox news, we let you decide. project veritas saying by the way it recorded over the last few months. you decide. [inaudible]

what's great is that covid is spiking in the red states. >> why do you think so? either those people come out to vote... >> we did reach out to pbs. we got a statement. they said this employer you know longer works for pbs, a mid-level staff attorney. doesn't speak on behalf of our organizationn nor did he make y editorial decisions. morede reaction, project veritas founder james o'keefe. let's lay out everything he said here. >> this is a principal attorney for pbs and he talks about how he's glad that people in red states are dying of covid. he advocates using molotov cocktails, throwing them at the white house, surrounding the presidential limo, he shows his hubris, he shows the elitism, everything like that caricature of a pbs lawyer or media executive would say and he's

advocating violence, sean and, in this tape be talking about how intelligent he is to take away children from their president, dhs during the bidens administration's as separate children from their parents. this is one of the chief lawyers for the corporation of public broadcasting which receives from theof dollars federal government, highlights a double standard because they advocate censorship in one of their lawyers is talking about how important it is to commit acts of violence. pbs fired him an hour or two go after this story today, one of the swiftest reactions we saw after a project where it has video. >> sean: we all have homeland security take kids from parentst enlightenment camps, reeducation camps, they'll have "sme" characters, watch pbs all day. americans are blanking dumb? good to liven in d.c. where people are educated. can you imagine if you live in one of these towns or cities where everybody is just stupid? what's great about covid biking

in red states, that's great, a lot of them, red state voters are sick and they are dying. sounds like a very nice man. >> one of the ironies is he's saying he's got the enlightened view to take kids away from their parents and support and insurrection.t' it's a double standard, sean. i think in this time a moral and political crisis, i think courage is contagious and we have all these whistle-blowers coming to us helping us expose -- we need more these people. right now i think there's a time to be hopeful, if we can create an army of exposure, sign light is the best disinfectant. exposure itself is the solution. >> sean: james o'keefe, thank you for sharing the video with us. appreciate it. a more "hannity" after this.

>> sean: unfortunately all the time we have left this evening but we hope you set your dvrs so you'll never miss an episode

of "hannity." the great one mark levin will respond to all of the constitutional madness that is washington, d.c. we will always be independent. we go our own path. always will try to get to the bottom of everything to tell you the truth. let not your heart be troubled because laura ingraham, bama won. roll tide. >> laura: that was the best political night of crazyha news combined with the best political -- athletic night for college football, okay? i almost botched that. you know what i'm saying. >> sean: nick saban, this guy just wins. speak to you i think the republican party should take some lessons. he doesn't acceptba mediocrity, has a great relationship with his players, and he -- even if they win, if they didn't do it right, he wants them to do it

again