have no by-products. (his voice) “baloney!” (automated voice) has joined the call. (voice from phone) hey, baloney here. i thought this was a no by-products call? land o' frost premium. fresh look. same great taste. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening, welcome to "tucker carlson tonight," happy monday. even his allies can see joe biden isn't as quick as he used to be, it takes about an hour and have to watch 60 minutes. to be fair, biden's administration may be the fastest in history. were less than a week in and the white house and immigration enforcement, sent american troops into armed conflict, crippled the last remaining independent sector of the economy, and officially for the first time in human history denied the biological reality of diversity. that happened in three and half business days. amazing, google's getting its

money's worth. congress is about to get involved in changing this country. democrats control the entire legislative branch, there should be a swift process too. the priority is house resolution number one, called that because it's the first bill in the legislative pipeline. what's in the bill? it's possible cnn hasn't brought you all the details yet. trying to save the country from forbidden ideas in internet chat rooms there. the actual legislation coming before congress will lead nancy pelosi herself explain what's in it. here's what you said about hr one back in october. >> we have plenty of work to do in the joe biden administration and were going to build the infrastructure in the greenway,e sure health care is available to all americans. access to prescription run demand drugs. we're going to have hr one right off the back, cleaner government so that we can get rid of the

big dark and just money. >> tucker: hr one is all about the big, dark, special interest money. and scary. you have to wonder why nancy pelosi is using the word dark is a euphemism for bad. whatever, it's nancy pelosi, as long it's not racist, nancy pelosi is a good person. the real question is how the party of ruthless corporate's gets away with talking points like that. we need cleaner government, shrieks the public of silicon valley. the answer of course as they get away with it because no one stopped them. this is the "for the people act" were talking about here. it's for the people to shut up. what exactly is the democrat party intend to do for the people? if you guessed it enshrined their own rule by force forever, you win today's daily double. good job. before the people act as the foundation of the democratic party strategy to control the federal government well into your grandchildren's will age. take a look at it, like most revolutionary documents, it's

not an exciting read, nothing that sounds radical at first until you think about it. the bill begins by declaring contrary to article one of the united states constitution, congress has "the ultimate supervisory power over federal election." that's a big change. under our current law, states get to decide how much fraud they will tolerate. florida requires you to show floor mic identification to vote. california wants you to vote democrat. if hr one passes, all 50 states will be california. the entire country will have ballot harvesting and mail-in voting. think about that. on generator six, we had a riot that the u.s. capital, why did that happen? it happened because millions of american voters were convinced the last election was not fair.

where did they get the idea? well, it wasn't because the last president told them, you're hearing it now as if their animals who take commands but they're not. they are people, they are american citizens, you can see what's happening and it comes to their own conclusions. they saw the radical increase in male encoding, millions dead, and to corroded their faith and the public's faith in our systems of election. they were enraged by that. according to democrats, the lessons of the terrible day is that we need more of the corrupt policies that caused it in the person back first place, we need voting in ballot harvesting, that'll unite the country. h.r.1 would literally enshrined fraud. here's a direct quote from the legislation. if "a state may not require individual to provide any form of identification with the condition of obtaining a absentee ballot." no identification whatsoever. nor can signatures be validated. here's another direct quote from h.r.1. "as state may not require notarization or witness signature or other formal authentication other than the voters word for it as the

condition for obtaining are casting an absentee ballot." under h.r.1, paid in political operatives could go to a house to house, apartment to apartment collecting unknown thousands of ballots then dump them all at a ballot drop box. no one would have any idea those ballots had been tablet emac tampered with any point along the way nor would they be any way to prove it if they had. hr one makes it harder for elecn observers to file complaints bee off as racist. a system like that is suicidal for democracies. no other free country would tolerate it, france encounter the don't tolerate it. they banned mail-in ballots. by the way, neither does amazon.com. it's a real company. jeff bezos who owes its, you're

a bigot if you oppose it. but when it comes to union elections, in his own company, elections that might require jeff bezos to pay his workers decent benefits and wages, he's totally opposed. amazons fighting male in balloting and the union election and alabama. amazon.com's position is an election decided by mail in ballots would not be valid or fair." when it is their power at stake, democrats have a totally different position and that's true in california right now. you may have heard that there's a recall effort underway in that state. voters are trying to boot their comically and competent governor, gavin newsom. but it's not so easy to get it done because democrats are requiring in person signatures for those petitioning. suddenly, they're worried about voter fraud. you should know this is not hypocrisy, republicans call it hypocrisy but it's not, it's far more per taunt the microphone than that. they don't care about democracy, they don't care about breaking their own rules, they're not offended by double standards.

they want power. this is a power grab that's all that is. your complaining means nothing to them. if you needed more evidence of that, this is an easy one, a new legislation from congress, a democrat from orlando. murphy proposed a bill that would ban anyone with the wrong opinions from having a significant job in the federal government. believe for a bit and things and you don't get a security clearance, you can't work here. murphy's bill would require for investigators to all applicants whether they had "associated with or knowingly engage in activities conducted by an organization or movement that spreads conspiracy theory and false information about the united states government." wait a second, conspiracy theories and false information about the united states government? sounds like these people could be in trouble. >> you can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion. >> there's clear evidence on the issue of collusion and the body of evidence. there are significant evidence

of collusion. there is of collusion of people in the trump campaign with russians. >> there's plenty of evidence of conspiracy. >> this is all evidence of collusion, their significant evidence and much in the public domain on the issue of collusion. >> tucker: just kidding, the people who spent years heading ludicrous conspiracy theories disproving actual theories that vladimir putin secretly controlled the federal government. those people will be fine. at this point, that would include everybody currently in power. yes, they're knee-deep in conspiracy theories that actually hurt our country, but this legislation isn't designed to punish them. just the opposite. this legislation is designed to protect them from your criticism. under stephanie murphy's bill, anybody who criticizes stephanie murphy could be punished. oh, make sense thank? you think all this might raise eyebrows among traditional several liberties folks as they

call themselves. come on now, it's 2021. the media love laws like this. laws like this are aimed directly at the media sworn archenemies. people who went to state schools and other undesirables. listen to the geniuses explain how the biggest threat to this country isn't chinese or germany or becoming hyperinflation, pretty much a certainty now, which was 100% caused by elite mismanagement of our economy. let's not talk about the outcome of the real threat is the forbidden idea, something called qanon. >> next, what to do about qanon and its droves of loyal followers. it is it too little, too late to bring our loved ones back to reality? >> many of those who believe the totally unfounded conspiracies and prophecies of qanon expect to generate 20th to be judgment day. >> as far right figures and qanon theorists believe the election was stolen. >> qanon was believed a on-ramp

to various extremist circles. >> many people have been marinated in these conspiracies, qanon enthusiast, it's frightening. >> tucker: mr. tom friedman thinks it's all pretty frightening. he's right, but not as usual for the reasons you think. we're watching a profound vein demand change taking place in american society. the states could not be higher. it's a clear line between democracy and tyranny between self government and dictatorship. that line is your conscience. they can't cross eyed. government has every right to tell you what to do, controlling the behavior of citizens is one of the basic prerogatives of any organized society, that's why we have it. government can prevent you from permitting murder, rape, it's legitimate. but no democratic government tends to ever tell you what to think. your mind belongs to you, it's yours and yours alone. once politicians attempt to

control what you believe, there are no longer politicians. they are by definition dictators. if they succeed in controlling what you believe, you're no longer a citizen, you're no longer a free man, you're a slave. yes, tom freeman, it's frightening. almost every one of them joined the mob of sensors, hysterics, and jacobin destroyers working on the health of entrenched power to take care control of everything. new ideas that this channel should be -- they're not arguing fox news is t inaccurate. they're arguing you should not

be able to watch fox news because they should be limited by force. a few days ago, former "new york times" columnist posted this question on twitter. "should fox news be allowed to exist?" no, he quickly concluded. fox news "should not be legal." no one on line seemed especially surprised by this view, among a certain group it's a gathering consensus. cnn certainly agrees with it. cnn is our direct competitor of course. you might imagine they would recuse themselves from this conversation. oh, but the opposite. cnn and staring down the barrel of some pretty lean years ratings wise. the reason for existing has departed from mar-a-lago, they would love one less news channel on the dial. over the weekend, the dwarf king summoned a pair of minions from the seller and turn them loose to explain that actually allowing people to watch what they want to watch on tv is a massive threat to democracy. >> president biden seems to understand right wing radicalization is the real problem. his team seems to recognize how fox and facebook, qanon, all that, has caused the separate reality in the united states. >> and remains a threat to our democracy, it is the reason why

there were hundreds of trump supporters storming the capital on generate sixth. until the poison on the toxin is drained from the national political discourse in the country, brian, i do think these forces represent a potential existential threat to the country. >> tucker: oh, existential, existential, existential. you should know that nobody on cnn had ever been asked to spell or define the word existential, the day it happened is the day they start using the word. then they called and reinforcements from jeff bezos who expressed interests in buying cnn. he wrote an entire column how the continued existence up on a single news channel who disagrees with the other news channel is you guessed it, a threat to democracy. that's too much choice, that's not democratic. "corporations that advertise on fox news should walk away." sullivan wrote, citizen who should care about the truth care

that they do so. again, margaret sullivan didn't ask people to stop watching fox news, she asked for us to be unemployed. our colleague max booth agreed to it. max booth labors for jeff bezos at "the washington post." when you work for the world's richest man, people tend to listen to. when you called for government officials to crush dissent, that's not a small thing. >> i think there's the possibility of reviving the doctrine with the fcc and force until 1987 in which a mandated some minimal standards of actuality and balance on the part of tv stations. since that's disappeared, it's been a complete free-for-all with all sorts of lunacy being sent directly into the right wing echo system. >> tucker: max booth, ladies and gentlemen, on the fairness doctrine. if the fairness doctrine, it's pretty amazing. it live fact that the fairness doctrine doesn't apply to cable

news since the u.s. government doesn't own the cable lines. you should consider the idea that max booth explained it as unfair for one news outlet to disagree with every other news outlet in the country. diversity of opinion is on the ferry. it's why it should be mandatory, it's inclusive. hilarious. in addition to everything else, these people are stupid. of course they're stupid, that's why the countries in trouble because the people who run the country can't find it with both hands. max booth has no choice to work with them "washington post. that doesn't mean max booth won't win. it's a mistake to imagine that simply because an idea is wrong, or stupid, or immoral, that it cannot prevail, at least for a while. of course it can prevail. history is filled with examples of this. new coke was a real beverage. the french revolution actually happen.

so, we should be worried when large numbers of people start saying irrational things and they definitely are saying. joe scarborough has a morning show on msnbc. look up animal cunning in the dictionary and you'll find joe scarborough's picture. when joe scarborough is is a herd animal, if all the kids are doing it, he wants to see it on the bus and he wants in. watch joe scarborough explained the people who appear on fox news need to be forced to shut up immediately. >> fox news has someone i know, a former leader of the republican party saying that democratics wanted to "exterminate" to exterminate all republicans. it let me say that again for fox news sponsors. for fox news sponsors, to let you know what's happening now on

fox news. that they're getting people who are fox news contributor's who were saying that democrats, joe joe biden democrats want to "exterminate" all republicans. >> tucker: oh, fox news sponsors. how honest you want to be a question mark the man you just saw has been accused in public by the president of the united states of murdering a young woman, not many can say that. what about taking the position on joe scarborough's position? one thing that we did not do and never do is go on tv to demand because joe scarborough was accused of violence, a company should not be allowed to sell to his viewers. that never occurred to us, never

for a second. were not fascist or that matter relates performers running away from their own countries. we are american. we think people we disagree with should still be allowed to talk in public. the tech monopolies have never believed that, they're not american companies, their conglomerates that don't answer. they're more powerful than the government at this point, you should know. last week on cnn, the former chief security officer at facebook, how does the title strike you, a man called alec stamos said this. >> it's hard because people are able to seek out information that makes them feel good and that people have so much choice now, they can choose what their new sources are, they can choose which influencers they want to follow. we have to turn down the capabilities of these conservative influencers to reach these huge evidences. there is people on youtube for example that have a larger audience than daytime cnn. they are radical in pushing extremely radical views. >> tucker: so, in the name of democracy my term of the moments, and the defense of the

people's will, we must center sr people and make sure individuals can't read and hear what they choose to read in here. at least they're being honest about it. information is power, they want the power, therefore they must control the information. so they are, that's what's happening. we told you one moment ago nobody seems to be fighting back against this tide of repression, not entirely true. this weekend, rupert murdoch the man who started the company won in a word from a foundation in the u.k. here's part of what he said when he accepted "for those of us in the media, there's a real challenge to confront their wave of censorship that seeks to silence conversation, stifle debates, ultimately stop individuals and societies from realizing their potential. this rigidly enforced conformity aided and abetted by so-called social media, is a straight jacket on sensibility. too many people have fought too hard for freedom of speech to be surprised by this awful walk orthodoxy."

this awful woke orthodoxy. we don't quote our boss on the show ever actually come up but that's exactly awful woke orthodoxy is precisely what this is. and there's nothing worse for the country or journalism. every publisher, every owner of every media company should be saying this in public every single day. but they're not, only all races. no wonder they hate us. glenn greenwald is a journalist and we hope you support his work. glenn, i want to ask you about the bill from stephanie murphy which is particularly ominous in the context that we were in, that would ban people that would fall in the categories that she is defining. who have certain beliefs from effectively from serving in the government. should your personal believes to be a criteria for employment in the federal government? >> well, the through line for

everything you just talked about, tucker, the democratic party which now controls the house, the senate, the white house genuinely believes they have a monopoly and objective truth. they believe the party of science and rationality and the only way to disagree with them if you're a deranged conspiracy theorist or a sedition nest, somebody who's engaged in criminal conduct or terrorism. they believe it's not a show, a pretext, they all have convinced one another through this echo chamber that they've created, which is why they want to shut it down. if you disagree with their orthodoxies and their consensus, you're a threat and a danger and it's ironic they spent four years claiming they are fighting fascism and authoritarianism. what are they trying to do now? they're trying to harness corporate and monopoly power to silence everybody who agrees with them, hallmark and the epitome of the fascism they claim to be fighting but in reality they embody. >> tucker: it's amusing, i'm

trying to say amusing. they cite russia as the thing that they hate most because they crackdown on press freedoms, and it's not a true democracy. as a pretext for imposing censorship on the press in the united states. i mean, is there no self-awareness at all or do they just not care? >> it is like there envious that they manage to consolidate the power they wish they could wield and are trying to wheel now. tucker, they genuinely want everyone who disagrees with them silenced. i know it sounds like her but i really if you don't pay attention constantly to the news, and it's not just random people who are saying it, its leading members of the democratic party, they're going to have partners in the latest wing of the republican party as well. they want to exploit their power to regulate corporations and monopolies -- they are saying it outright, they are saying we now control and regulate your industry and we demand that you stop using your advertising money for this network that

criticizes us, the party in control. if that is and authoritarianism, what is? they want to shut everybody down, the internet they destroyed an entire social media platform. they just took it off the internet because they obstructed silicon valley monopolies that was their obligation to remove it. it's very chilling. you can't overstate how bloodthirsty they are. >> tucker: 's times years ago that i thought glenn was paranoid and i don't think you're wrong anymore. you're prophetic and i appreciate you coming on. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: so, the people with the most power in the world aren't just trying to do demand to stripes fox news, they're open about it. they'd like to unravel the social fabric of the country things like gender and men and women. those are the foundations of any civilization and all the sun and they have no meaning. abaco schreier fought a lot in

the face of hostility of what it means for the rest of us. she joins us next. ♪ ♪

♪ if i could be you and you could be me ♪ ♪ for just one hour ♪ ♪ if we could find a way to get inside each other's mind ♪ ♪ walk a mile in my shoes ♪ ♪ walk a mile in my shoes ♪ ♪ well before you abuse, criticize and accuse ♪ ♪ walk a mile in my shoes ♪

♪ ♪ >> tucker: as we told the other the ninth, joe biden signed an executive order, one of his first acts as president,

essentially invalidates the idea of biological sex. want to remember collations, one that allows biological men to compete in women's sports. to understand what effect this will have in practical terms, consider the one fact. if 300 male high school students in this country have faster 400 meters times than the fastest female sprinter in the world. it's not a small thing for all of us, particularly for women sports. abigail shrier is one of the few people who thought it through, brought the conclusions public, and face the enormous hostility in the press that resulted. she's the author of "irreversible damage: the transgender craze seducing our daughters." we're happy to have her on tonight. thanks for coming on. you're one of the very few people in our public conversations who's willing to say what you do and present your conclusions without apology. what you think about the executive order? >> this order spells for destruction of women sports.

probably the biggest blow to women's rights we've seen in decades. the olympian you mentioned who is a remarkable and possibly the greatest female sprinter of all time, she has more on the big metals than you've seen both. as you've said, her time for the 400 meters is 4.296 seconds. nearly 300 high school boys and 2018 and america alone could beat it. we're talking about a world in which no one's heard of alex and felix, where alex and felix doesn't make the team. >> tucker: i just wonder why, and there's a lot of implications that affect all of us regardless of sex but it certainly seems a direct attack on the woman's rights you just explained. i don't see any woman's group standing up in the face of this to point it out. why? >> well, they're sort of the hard left and it had the deconstruction's of its reasons and the youthful idiots were

going along with it. i think a lot of people believe in -- they tend to hide behind linkage of inclusivity. the truth is if you want to be inclusive is make sure transgender athletes who have male bodies feel welcome and comfortable on the male team. because putting male bodies against male body, that's what sports is about. it's about bodies, not about identification. >> tucker: writes, so by doing that you would be conceding that sex differences are biological and unchangeable and the cosmetic surgery doesn't make it go away. you can't concede it because if the play along with the liar or else they hurt you. >> this is the stuff that's actual science, right? it's also common sense. i mean, you can lower someone's activation all levels of testosterone, okay? but it won't make an important difference.

the reason is -- it won't make enough of a difference, the reason is male purity confers a massive and unbridgeable, permanent advantage on male bodies. we know that, they have larger hearts, larger lungs, more fast twitch muscles fibers, greater muscle mass that correspond with strength and speed. >> tucker: what our high school biology class is going to look like? 's every biology teacher that has to go along with the long? >> i hope not. at some point i do encourage americans when it comes to your school, it's time to stand up. time to stand up for our girls. >> tucker: amen. you're a brave person then i hope your example inspires people, i really do. abaco schreier, think you very much. >> thank you, thank you. to be when we told you last week about the internal email sent from the senior ice officials, the email ordered the release of

all illegal immigrants in federal custody. major developments tonight on the order and we will tell you what they are and joined by a former white house advisors stephen miller. we will be right back. ♪ ♪

>> tucker: as we reported to you last week on friday, immigration officials were told in the internal email on thursday to release all migrants from detention "immediately." more details say on the email on the paternal response to it. the filing shows that the orders in the email were retracted after this show reached out on friday afternoon for comment. "this is a response internally, retract this directive immediately. advise your supervisors to follow the memorandum. guidance is being developed and issued in the coming days." the red traction came a day and a half after the initial email. once again, right after we called about it. another i.c.e. official chimed

in that the order only applied to some detainees who are said to be deported, but would not be removed to do to the order. this could be detainees considered high risk of getting covid. detainees qualify if there is tr the age of 55, high blood pressure, et cetera. the deportation more a time at the very least has been chaotic but implications for the rule of law, the nature of the country going forward. stephen miller thought a lot about this, white house senior advisor. he joins us tonight. stephen miller, thank you for coming on. >> thanks for having me, tucker. >> tucker: you spent four years in the face of very intense opposition both outside and inside within it working on the issue. what does it mean? tell us the implications of joe abundance presidential directive directive on the migration? >> thank you, tucker. this is the most extreme

directive, i would argue, really in the history of modern law enforcement has ever been issued. it let me break it down for everybody. acting secretary issued a memorandum on the evening of january 20th, the day of the inauguration, putting into place a 100 day deportation moratorium. there is a very narrow exceptions that apply to a handful of people in a given year. it would be terrorists, spies, and really extraordinary cases. but the 180,000 people that i.c.e. removed last year, though same 180,000 people could not be removed this year as a result of the deportation moratorium. of those 180,000 people, tucker, 92% of them are criminals. either charged or convicted of a crime. in this memo, there is no exceptions clause for criminals. i repeat, there is no exceptions

clause for criminals. what does this mean operationally? i was the email sent? what it means, tucker, that the work of i.c.e. officers will grind to a halt beginning february 1st. why february 1st? because that's the date by which i.c.e. has to come up with implementing guidance for the memo. so, every sheriff's office, every police department, every correctional facility in the country that for years has been handing over illegal aliens to i.c.e. to pick them up and take them home, which is the burden daughter of i.c.e.'s work, all those people will not get picked up anymore. why won't they get picked up? because you can't arrest something you can't deport. if that's the foundational principle of the memo. i.c.e. is not a jail, i.c.e. has detention facilities exclusively for stationing people for removal. you can pick somebody up who you're not going to remove. beginning in a few days, about

12,000 criminals per month are going to be released into the u.s. communities. i'm basing 12,000 number on what the average was last year of how many arrests were given in a particular month or how many arrests were made in the particular month. it could be higher and then that, because last year obviously with the pandemic numbers went down a bit and the vaccine arrests normally he would expect them to go back up especially between 12 and 15,000 criminals a month it will be released back into communities. it gets worse, in addition to that of their are forbidden by the terms of the memo for removing visa over stays. any student who comes here, foreign worker who comes here on the temporary visa, the expiration date now means nothing. worksite enforcement, gone. it doesn't exist anymore. as of january 20th, joe biden declared there is no more workplace immigration laws. you as a u.s. citizen do not have the protection of your laws. your civil rights do not matter. what about immigration?

what if he failed to appear in immigration court and can you be deported out of the memo? no. what if you show up at immigration court, your order to be removed, but decide not to go home. can someone come pick you up, take you home? no. the whole system, tucker, is dismantled. >> tucker: this is -- i don't agree fully understood the implications to this when we reported on the order last week. there is far more terrifying than i even thought. i'm grateful for you to explaining it and i hope you'll come back. stephen miller, thank you. >> thank you so much, tucker. >> tucker: turns on joe biden joe biden isn't simply the new presidents, he's a holy man. he's a miracle worker. from california to illinois come to the state of michigan, suddenly coronavirus restrictions as if by magic has been lifted. what's changed exactly apart and we will tell you after the break. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> tucker: joe biden and is now the president and that means it's time for science, that's

when you get people in lab coats as you layout it your political decrease. it means the coronavirus has changed once again. california, on the hanoi, washington, d.c., announced indoor dining isn't dangerous anymore. if that was fast. in a state of michigan, officials say they will lift the ban on february 1st even though daily coronavirus deaths in the state are still higher than they were when the indoor dining band was announced. it didn't work, but were not going to acknowledge it because joe biden's president. and how did he do that? how he gets so holy? chadwick moore is a columnist, not a theologian, but joins us tonight to assess joe biden's power. what you make of this, chadwick? >> it's not unheard of. i heard when him, the founder of north korea was born, a star appeared in the sky and the double rainbow. some leaders have the touch. when joe biden was coordinated,

not only did the broken fractured land that the dictator destroyed become healed and united, but the virus is gone. amazingly. i know some of the democrat leaders like new york and california only had about six or seven months to see that they could open the states like florida, texas, georgia, and everything be basically fine. it is just amazing after the inauguration, after all the final pieces were laid and the whole college but was confirmed, we all knew california, illinois, the other states would follow suit. it's just interesting that these democrat voters don't see that speculation that the governors held their states hostage psychologically and economically, it's too dark for some people to fathom. but it certainly seems to be what happened here all for a political optics, to keep the

economic numbers down to heard trump before the election. and then joe biden came into office. >> tucker: so if what happened on january 6th is being described as a arm racist insurrection, the question is how long do we hear that the lockdowns that were imposed on the nation by right wing racist evangelical q1 nonextremists? >> [laughs] they probably want to acknowledge it, not like they have anything to worry about with the media calling that amount on behavior. obviously, andrew cuomo got an emmy for his press conference before he wrote a book congratulating himself on handling the virus come up before it was even over a period of course, new york for example, the viruses were higher than they were a month ago. yes, it is still fun to open. it seems like they're holding people hostage, i don't think they want to acknowledge that this is what it looks like.

the lesson here seems to be that things are much nicer when the democrats control everything so you better keep us in power because we can take it away again. it's me when you've done a great job in chicago. chadwick moore, great to see you tonight. if you're in on noticing a theme here, it's that in modern america, all of us are forced to lie about the obvious all the time. the one thing you can say are the things that are right in front of your face. the more obvious it is, the more for a bit and it is to note. what does that do with society was back if you got the coronavirus vaccine, kids back to school, well, we will tell you what they're saying. if straight ahead. ♪ ♪

(announcer) need to lose weight? can't figure out why those diets won't work for you? get golo. golo is the smart weight loss solution that works! go to golo.com where over 1 million people just like yourself have found golo and the answer to a new and better way to lose weight.

this is not only a weight loss journey, this is a complete transformation mentally and physically. (announcer) so many people have changed their lives and lost the weight with the help of golo. why shouldn't you? want to lose 60 pounds? how about 100 pounds? you can! and golo will give you the incredibly effective tools to do it. (woman) i have found how healthy and happy life can be. and i'm doing it all with golo. golo is not hard. it's easy and it will change your life. (announcer) go to golo.com, that's g-o-l-o.com to find the answer to a new and better way to lose weight.

♪ piano playing ♪ ♪ “what the world needs now” ♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope help now at redcross.org >> teachers unions are still refusing to go back to work that is defying the government's reopening fan, kids have killed themselves because of the displacement ofg these lockdowns joe biden said today he supports the teachers unions decision.

if dr. marc siegel is a fox news medical contributor. good to see you. >> good evening. let's start with the fact that chicago teachers union as the boy who cried wolf. they struck in 20122019 they struck for 15 days and inconvenience drastically t 300,000 kids in the school district so it's hard to believe them now with their posturing claiming there may not be enough precautions in place but chicago public schools reports spending $100 million on their schools to make them safe for ventilation for distancing, from asking proper testing. a district down the road is already doing saliva testing on all of their students. there is no reason whatsoever the schools can't be open especially given what you said the collateral damage here, over in clark county where las vegas is, there's been 3100 calls to

suicide hotlines from kids over the course of their schools being closed in 18 children have committed suicide over the nine months of the pandemic, 18 children and with the same thing that can happen in chicago, but let me point out something which is that covid-19 does not spread easily among children. it does not spread easily from children to teachers and we know that. what does spread easily is despair, anxiety, depression not getting your teeth taken care of were your eyes examined or not having looked out for developmental delays, all of the things you need in school, sog i will say this chicago teachers union tonight, tucker. the vaccine is coming. next week, you guys qualify, all of you can get the vaccine. i bet when they get the vaccine they will reopen everything right? >> responsible adults would rather get covid than hurt kids.

great to see you, thank you. we are out of time sadly. we'll be back tomorrow night 8:00 p.m., the show that is the sworn enemy of mine, smugness and groupthink. sean hannity standing by in new york, take it away. >> sean: think you on this monday. welcome to hannity. we are tracking multiple major stories that will impact your life including the shocking the scene from new york city, look at this friday night 11:30 a.m. broad daylight, the streetss of new york city, that man right there and beaten, slashed robbed by a group of 12 people. make no mistake, violent crime is now spiraling out of control in many of america's major cities. v it goes back to rioting in portland, seattle, and denver this week. this is what defunding the police and helping people arrested get free bail kamala harris and not speaking out and calling riots riots