[laugh] dad i got a job! i'm moving out. [laugh] dream sequence ending no! in three, no! two, keep packing! one. here. right here. right now. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." it's funnyn how change happens. you thought the big change happen on election day, that's how an incumbent president loss. that came nothing to the change that came two months later. on january 6th come supporters of donald trump swarmed the capitol building, some forced their way inside and washington had s never been the same. it may never be the same. as a result of what happened on january 6th, your descendants will live in a very different country. it's a pivot point in our history looking back. some in congress have compared

that dates to 9/11. senate majority leader 9/11 every day we hear new and more floored comparison from democratic partisans. but last night, cnn did all of them. chernobyl, the irish potato famine? no. what happened on january 6th was worse than that. very much like the rwandan genocide. >> the idea what we saw a lot of the last four years. a lot of seconds, easy to other eyes people, make them other, wn in bosnia, telling people the radio listeners that to tutsi werecockroaches. >> tucker: that's what it was like they are close to a million people were murdered in rwanda

in 1994, 70% of all ethnic tutsis in that country. they were crushed alive, hundreds of thousands of women were raped. some of the most horrifying crimes in human history. how does aec country recover frm that, i genocide? punish the guilty quickly and severely. in this case, impeach him. this is more important. you said about reordering your society from top to bottom to make certain nothing like that ever happens again. so you purge of the military. you suspend basic civil liberties. you send troops to the capitol. you strip all vestiges of the past in order to save the future. that's what's going on now. but hold on. before we remake america to prevent future genocide at the capital, maybe we should know more about the crime that occurred on january 6th, if only to understand the justification

for overturning our livesan permanently. what exactly did happen that day? simple question. tyou were surprised to know how little we know now. it's remarkable how many of the basic questions remainin unanswered during a month after the fact. let's start with the headlines of the day. five americans died on the capitol grounds shout and wear a sixth. you hear it incessantly including from republican officeholders. five dead.ay doesn't tell you much. it's the details that matter is always. who were these people and how did they die? that's how you understand what happened.ap with that in mind, here are the facts as of tonight. four of the five that they were trump supporters. the fifth was a capitol hill police officer who apparently also supported donald trump. why is this relevant? the political views of deceased shouldn't matter but unfortunately in this case they do. alexandria ocasio-cortez and many other elected democrats claim the mob was coming for them that day.

if the only recorded casualties on january 6th where people who voted for donald trump you're the first among them the 34 year old from georgia named rose and boylan. reports announced that died of a medical emergency. she may have been trampled by the crowd, still not sure. that's the best guess. the second casualty was 55-year-old kevin greeson, died of heart failure while talking to his wife on a cell phone outside the capital. "kevin had a history of high blood pressure," his wife later said, "in the midst suffered a heart attack." third wasas benjamin phillips of ring town pennsylvania. organized a bus trip to washington for the rally that day. suffered a stroke on the grounds of the capitol. no evidence that he was writer, or the only person to die that day of intentional violence was 35

year old ashli o babbitt, a military veteran from san diego. babbitt was wearing a trump cape. her death caught on video so hers is the best documented death that took place that day. it's surprising how little we know about it. shot while she tried to crawl through a broken window into the speakers lobby within t the 325 and that's the extent of what we know. investigators have refused to er we may not know why this unnamed capitol hill police officer took her life. "there's no way to look at the evidence and think he's any way our hero. we can't look at the evidence because they are withholding it. killing an unarmed woman may be justified under certain specifis circumstances, but when is it"? "heroic" when the dead woman has

read q anon websites. "you did what you had to do," the congressman said. did the officer really had to do that? we don't know. itou be nice to know. maybe someone could ask. we knowli ashli babbitt wasn't holding a weapon when she was killed. nevertheless at the impeachment hearing, congressman davis' lien of rhode island called it "an armed insurrection." watch. >> he incited an armed, angry mob to riot. inciting an armed insurrection against the united states government, armed, angry, dangerous crowd, armed violence against the government of united states of america. >> tucker: davids sicilian is a former mafia lawyer from providence oprah for your there is no reports of rioters at the capitol building that they discharge and weapons were threatening anyone with a gun.

what exactly is david talking aboutrs question monkeys areth talking about the death of officer brian said nick a fire extinguisher. the fire extinguisher apparently is the deadly weapon. the "armed" the armed and armed insurrection. the news of sicknick's death by violence was picked up. >> officer brian sicknick died after being hit in the head hours after the attack. >> officer died after being hit in the head with a fire extent was sure during the fight. >> f died at the age of 42 after he was bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher. >> tucker: capitol hill police officer beaten to death with a fire extent which are about ay whites premises mob is horrifying and that's the story they were telling, the story

they are still telling. that forms the basis of the myth that democrats have constructed around january 6th., streams of politicians have told us the cops are racist by definition. those same people praise brian sicknick as a hero. they finally found a police officer who served their political uses.le kamala harris and her husband for example arrive to pay their respects a and as they did they said not one thing about defunding the police. the story they told was alive from beginning to end. officer wasn'te. beaten to death come nt with anything else. according to an exhaustive and new analysis on "revolver news," no evidence that officer brian sicknick was not hit with anything, bore no signs of trauma. in fact, on the night of januarr

rioters have been dispersed, brian sicknick texted his brotheris from his office. according to his brother -- >> and he too said he had been "pepper sprayed twice" and was in good shape. 24 hours later, officer brian sicknick was dead. officials say he had a stroke, more no more given. sicknick's body was cremated immediately. nobody has been charged in his death. no charges are pending. whatever happened to brian sicknick was tragic, obviously. but it was also very different from what they had told us.. they had lied about what they how hedied. for example, how did this riot r start? was it akl spontaneous event inspired by a reckless president on his way out? that's one version of the story. or was the right long planned, was a conspiracy? both cannot be true. this weekend, the former chief

of the capitol hill police claimed in a letter to nancy pelosi that there was no intelligent suggesting that a riot might be imminent at the a ycapitol. apparently "the washington post" has better sources. january 5th, reported that it was wellkn known that a group of trump supporters were heading to the city to cause trouble. the fbi certainly knew this. the feds had paid informers in the ranks of protesters. one off the rioters we learned was a former fbi employee. wasol he still on the fbi payro? he wouldn't be the first. if the authorities knew that violence might be coming to the capitol, where was he w necessay security? it wasn't t there. the response of law enforcement on the scene that date is baffling, the more you look into it.os in some publicly available videos, capitol hill police seem to be all but inviting rioters into the building. here is one example. >> i want you to go home. go, go!

[bleep]! >> let's [bleep] go! >> tucker: whatwe does all of this mean exactly? we are not sure what it means and we are not going to speculate. we do known for certain that the known facts of what happened on january 6th dv eight and very important ways from the story they are now telling us, including the story they told u. the known facts bear no resemblance toce the story they are telling. they are just flat out lying. there is no question about that. the question is why would they lie about this? for an answer, think back to last spring. beginningns on memorial day, blm and their sponsors in corporatet america complete the change this country. they change this country more in five months then it changed in the previous 50 years. how did they do that?

they use the sad death of a man named george floyd to end our society. we learn the story they told us about george floyd's death was an utter lie. no physical evidence that george floyd was murdered by a cop. the autopsy showed that george floyd almost certainly died of a drug overdose. fentanyl. by that point, facts didn't matter, it was too late. cities had been destroyed along with the fabric of this country itself. scores of people had been killed. democratic partisans used a perfectly concocted myth, a lie, to bum-rush america into overturning the old order and handing them much more power. it worked. flawlessly. so why wouldn't they do it again. the man who wants all of this happen, great observer of larry elder. way to see you tonight. >> thank you for having me, tucker. i appreciate it appreciate it. >> tucker: it's hard not to feel -- i'm not alleging a

conspiracy because it's happening in plain sight, but it's hard to feel that a historic event, january 6th, no person would ever defend, is beingli used by political partisans to gather more power to themselves and the rest of us are letting it happen. >> tucker, everything is said about needing more facts is , rational, and completely irrelevant becausele donald trump had been impeacheds twice and is now standing his second impeachment trial for the unpardonable capital offense, capital felony of being donald trump. the left thinks donald trump himself is a crime scene. look at some of the characters involved in this player, maxine waters, everybody knows maxine waters urge to threaten donald trump cabinet members, put back on them, surround them, form a crown, let them know they are not welcome anywhere anymore. forget about that. this is a woman who wrote a letter to fidel castro when congress passed a resolution urging castro to send back to america a woman who had murdered

a new jerseyle trooper, broke ot of prison, and fled to cuba. maxine waters writes castro a letter, likens him to a freedom fighter, a former black panther, and the only reason she's been prosecuted is she's been persecuted for political beliefs and urge castro to keep this woman but she remains they are as we. chuck schumer of course is going to vote to convicte, president trump. chuck schumer has often played the race card when asked whether or not donald trump is a racist. he said, well, he has said racist things. 1974,om a young, upcoming ambitious politician named chuck schumer met with some racist neighbors in an area inin new york called flatbush. two buildings, tucker, that had black, and ends. they weren't committing any crimes. these racist neighbors wanted them out. young schumer met with the neighbors and said, here's what i'll do. i'll introduce a measure to renovate these buildings. they will have a right of first

refusal, but we'll make them so nice they won't be able to afford to come back. and voila, he introduced a scheme. unfortunately for schumer and the racist schumer, the blacks were able to come back with money that were nicer than the eggs, and they left, but not foh want of trying. the man attaining this meeting is j how many , and writer for "american spectator." i've interviewed him many times on my radio show and i've asked him, h has anybody from "the new york times," "washington post" asked you about this and he said, no. the media is uninterested to purge a new york neighborhood in 1974 of a black people. 1974 is a long time ago, i'll give you that. same time that donald trump, a young donald trump entered into a consent decree with the hka to disk of new practices the hka thatis often cited as a reason r donald trump's alleged racism. around the same time, chuck schumer introduced this racist scheme to purge a

new york neighborhood of black people and nobody gives a. this is a kind of double standard we been up against before four years and i'm sick of it. these characters involved in getting rid of donald trump, impeaching him, they've done terrific things and cannot care less but who writes a letter to castro? who in 1974 is using a plan to get rid of black people? who does that? media indifferent. >> tucker: i completely agree. they win because they scream louder. great to see you tonight. anchor for that. >> thank you, tucker. thank you for the time, i appreciate it. >> tucker: thank you. mark cuban is a billionaire. mark cuban is not a genius. you think that would make him very grateful for america, a country were geniuses, people not geniuses can make a billion dollars. but he's not grateful. he just announced that his nba team is no longer playing the national anthem.

you are not going to hear it anymore. that's how much he dislikes the country that helped them win. we've got details right after this.

oh, you think this is just a community center? no. it's way more than that. cause when you hook our community up with the internet... boom! look at ariana, crushing virtual class. jamol, chasing that college dream. michael, doing something crazy. this is the place where we can show the world what we can do. comcast is partnering with 1000 community centers to create wifi-enabled lift zones, so students from low-income families can get the tools they need to be ready for anything. oh we're ready. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: ma >> tucker: mark cuban is a billionaire. he owns the dallas mavericks, the nba team.

like other nba owners, he makes a lot of money in china and according to mark cuban the nongenus billionaire it's time fine for china to commit genocie here they are good customers. he wants to take a knee, that's how awful you think this country is. >> if they were taking a knee, i would be proud of them. hopefully i would join them because i think we've learned a lot since 2017. i think we've evolved as a country and a this is a unique point inin time where we can grw as a society, grow as a country and be much more inclusive. >> tucker: this week and the name of inclusivity, mark cuban has decided the national anthem can no longer be played during any home game in dallas. the nba initially supported this decision. this afternoon the nba changed its mind, the league released a statement, "all teams will play

the national anthems in keeping with long-standing legal policy. will, good to see you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: seems to me the nba could have said it's not just long-standing policy, we appreciate the country where our sport was invented and sustains us. why not take the chance to defend america in the face of this attack on it? >> that would be unfashionable, tucker. the fashionable point of view and the oneas mark cuban seems o have adopted perhaps because some of his employees hold his point of view, some of his employers hold his view, but it's certainly a radical point of view, is that america is irredeemably flawed, we are defined by our original sin of slavery and racism. her flag, a symbol that's politically divided. that's not true. most people know that's not true. the united statesni is unique experiment in human history and we are defined by our aspirations, our goals like the

constitution and ultimately, tucker, we know that is unifying elements, unifying symbols. but mark seems to have adopted this idea and totally dictated by the terms of the left that the united states, its symbols are divisive, we see the worse in america and we must cancel all of these symbols at the rest of us see as our aspirations and unifying factors. that is why they will not take a principled stand. >> tucker: i think that's really smart and nicely t expressed. those symbols amounts to our culture and our culture is the only thing that unites us. without a common culture, what do we have at that point? >> right? it. will tell you something more than that. part of that culture is sports.n i love sports, tucker. if you know anything about me, i came from the world of sports. it brings together across racial barriers, socioeconomic barriers can we arbitrarily root for these ridiculous jerseys and laundry that we grew up all in. i'm coming to you live from dallas, i'm from the dfw area,

i'm a lifelong member expand. i suffered through the '90s. i'm excited about luca don church. i am a true heartfelt fan of the dallas mavericks. but if you make me choose between the united states of america and the mavericks, it will not be a hardd choice. >> tucker: nicely put. good to see you tonight, thank you for coming on more cuban than any other decadent like him is always invited on the show ton explain his point f view per joe biden pushing the raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. it'll definitely hurt others. according to the congressional budget office, the $15 minimum wage would eliminate almost a million and a half jobs, increase the federal deficit dramatically. he wrote a column about it, a publisher for "

"the daily caller." thank you for coming on. economic arguments aside, it does seem like the minimum wagei is popular in general with the public and this is likely to have been given who controls congress. givenwa that, what is the wise y do you think to raise the minimum wage? >> tucker, thanks for having me. if you are going to have a minimum wage, it doesn't make any sense to have it the same in every location in america. it cost more than twice as much to live in manhattan than it does inn a small town in kansas, and there is no earthly reason both those places should have them the same minimum wage but doesn't have a sense to have the same minimum wage for hugee multinational colonies withll thousands of employees and billions of dollars d in profitt it does for the deli on the cor. the deli owner is working in his show come out once a few hours off and bring in a high school kid. these concepts, the left's

concept wage, i think it's much easier to assign that to a walmart or target then it is to the deli guy. yet we don't. we have one minimum wage applying in every place where every business. it makes zero sense. >> tucker: could it have something to do with who donates to which political party? it seems like some of these big businesses would actually be in favor of a higher minimum wage if they thought it would drive their competitors out of business. >> the huge multinational companies that dominate washington and these policy debates are actually mostly for the minimum wage increase. the l retailers, big retailers like target, walmart, amazon, they are definitely in for it, publicly in favor of it because they crushed their small business competitors. they are already paying a 15 hour dollar wage and they know the ones they compete with, the small town businesses, can't afford it. that's another reason why, you know, why doesn't washington called their bluff?

how about $20 or more on huge multinationals but ten or less on then small business on the corner? >> tucker: this is pretty much the last thing after a year of covid and riots that small businesses need right now, is it not? >> it's the last thing small businesses need. it's the last thing our country needs. i do not know if you saw the stats today, 68% of the people involved in the capitol hill riots have gone to extreme economic hardship recently, meaningme bankruptcies, massive credit layoffs.he so the problems we have in our economy especially in the small business sector were small businesses just lost 30% of the revenue this year and 30% of all small businesses just closed down, washington needs to start looking at this and coming up with more innovative policies than ones that are aligned with the big business agenda. >> tucker: that such a smart point that i've heard from nobody else. $30 minimum wage for amazon warehouse workers, no minimum wage for the dry cleaner on your

block. i appreciate you coming on tonight. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: you may have thought that once the coronavirus vaccine arrives, you can visit your elderly relatives who are locked away in the hospital or nursing home. but no. a public health expert wants you to know that the vaccine does not mean you're getting your freedom back, just the opposite. straight ahead.

>> live from america's muse headquarters, i'm checking up on you in new york. president biden talks to his chinese compartment, says mr. biden pressed the chinese leader in beijing's lockdown of democracy activists in hong kong as well as other human rights concerns. the two spoke after hours after president biden unveiled plans to reveal strategy in china.

after a visit to wuhan, china, world health organization experts have concluded that the deadly coronavirus likely came from bats, not a lab. scientist still did not know when or where that happened. they leave open the possibility of the virus spread to people from frozen food. the virus has killed more than 2 million people worldwide. i'm jackie >> tucker: you thought the kronos virus coronavirus vaccine would change her life. the p goalpost have moved again. the northwestern medical school professor called mick mccoy told npr this week that you are parents and stay isolated until we achieve herd a immunity. mccoy warned "you pose a clear and present danger to your parents despite the vaccine. dr. mark steagall is a fox news medical contributor.

>> sean: good to see >> good to see you. when you move the goalposts, hope is replaced with despair and public health need to be consistent for a lot of emphasis were put on these vaccines which is why i'm really glad to see dr. mitch katz of most people, the ceo of health and hospitals of failing new york city's same monday the press conference, hey, is a vaccine, i'm about it. excited it works, and it's the way back. he said it's the way back. he also said, my 98-year-old father, and my 93-year-old mother are now going to take visitors from their children. i was so happy to see that, especially when you consider what is public health anyway? it's an overall cost, isn't it? there is a big study out of boston in september that said that 25% of americans are suffering from clinical depression. that means that 75 or 100% of americans, that's you, me, everyone can have some kind of

anxiety or depression and its permeating us not to have hope. i have to admit something i'mno embarrassed to admit. last spring as you know, my parents had covid-19. but when they came back to new york, i was permeated with a fear too. i met them on the porch, i was afraid to come to close even though i knew they were amusing and i knew that i could come close, where my mask, come close. but i was afraid for more than a ten minute visit. i'm happy to report tonight, tucker, my father has at the vaccine, my mother's had the vaccine, i've had the vaccine, i'm hopping on a plane and i'm planning to see you. i'm wearing my mask but i'm coming to see you. tucker? >> tucker: have a great reunion. good to see you tonight. thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: according to some of our public health experts, everything that happened, good or bad, is more proof we need more lockdowns.

if they go down, you know what that means question work more lockdowns. because that's science. >> states rollback restrictions, casesou bike. your mind when you see states rollback restrictions right now. are we in the clear? >> this is such a bad idea. who slows down once you break into the lead? it makes zeroer sense. >> tucker: the biden administration is taking this seriously. instead of reopening all the schools right now as the science calls for, they are promising in a few months about 50% of schools will be open. and by open they mean one day a week. well that sounds terrible for kids, justst relax, that's how science works. you have to make it up as you go along out of nothing. for example just a year in the pandemic, the cdc declared that. everyone really should be wearing two masks. if you are only wearing one, you are a science denier.

the author of "unreported truths of covid-19," joins us from an undisclosed location. it's great to see you tonight. you have been calling for schools to reopen on the base of the actual signs for quite some time. where do youim make of where we are right now? >> it is absurd. it's been obvious since last may, really. arguably late april that schools should be open in places like australia they were talking about reopening schools back early. the biden plan is ridiculous. it actually is a step back believe it or not the more we are right now. there is joe biden doesn't want to call for in the median reopening of schools is he knows that he can't do it. donald trump tried that and he failed. donald trump was not beholden ti the teachers union so it didn't cost them anything except embarrassment, i guess. or it just showed couldn't do it. for biden, he will anger his

constituency, he will look weak. so he's not going to do anything that's going to anger the teachers union. instead he's going to have these were dateless metrics that can't be met and, you know, meanwhile, every day goes by, another day where tens of millions of kids do not get socialized, do not get to see their friends, don't get potentially out of abusive homes. >> tucker: i've got to ask you something because i can't control myself and it's about you specifically. you been on the show for almost a year, never asked what your politics are, used to work at "the new york times," i'm assuming you're a democrat but i do not think you are any kind of right winger. you've been talking about science for a year on the show and because of that people have started to really be mad at you. you are also a novelist. what effect has speaking out about what the data tell you had on your life? i can't resist asking you. >> so, tucker, the data... i wrote a book that came out yesterday.

that book is called "the power n couple." it's a novel. i wrote it before covid. i wrote it in 2018 and 2019. i cannot get anybody to cover that book. "the new york times," all the thees that covered all previous novels i wrote for the last 15 years won't cover it in i can only surmise that that is because they i don't like what m saying about covid, that i'm not on the train, that i point out the problems with math that i've been talking about the question whether vaccines whether the clinical trial made ittu seem, l thee- stuff signed space they don't like, so they can't hit at me because i don't work for them anymore but they can come to be forgetting any publicity for "the power couple." i haven't. itit hurts me a little bit. you know what? i'm a big boy, those are the rules of the game, all move on. i'll keep telling the truth. >> tucker: some time you'll etake your ample energy and thik through and write a book may be on what this is about. how did signs get so political?

why does quoting studies make p you a personal nonbrought out in certain parts of the country? i think it be interesting to hear about that. good luck. >> mye next book will be nonfiction. >> tucker: congrats on the novel. good to see you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: women's rights, the most basic right to be acknowledged as females are under attack in this country. what we are seeing is not unprecedented. it's happened before. it's happening on a large scale in europe. she knows what it is. she joins us next to explain it.

>> tucker: cases of sexual violence against women >> tucker: cases of sexual violence against women appear to be rising rapidly in many parts of europe. a measurable wave. why is this happening? our old friend one of very few people who seems to be trying to understand why. a research fellow at the hoover institute and author of the new group "prey: the erosion of women's rights."

is this happening? do we know as a fact it's happening, and if we do why do you think it's happening? >> it's happening because the people who are elected to manage immigration in europe have failed to do that. elected officials have pretended that they were managing immigration, but they weren't. there are large numbers of people that are coming from the middle east, from africa, from south asia, most of them are young men. when they come to europe, they behave in exactly the same way that they behave towards their own women. elected officials pretend that there is a policy when there isn't. women are affected and other vulnerable groups, for instance, minorities such as homosexuals, jewish people appear this is

been going on for decades. the subject of my book is focusing on women's issues. but the real truth is that sexual violence against women, and especially, tucker, against women who live in lower income neighborhoods are affected more than other women, and that's why the whole #me toomovement hasn't goneve there. this is a story of incompetence. >> tucker: apparently have lied about the rates, trying to suppress public understanding of what's happening. is that to cover their own mistakes or sins, do you think? why would they do that? >> not all countries are the same. countries like denmark are actually doing a great job of saying, okay, we have a problem, have to do something on it, we have to work on integration and when they say integration, that

really means spelling out that there is such a thing as national identity and national values. here is how we treat our women and if you come from some other country, you will have a different attitude to women. we are happy to teach you and we want to make you a part of this society. if you fail to do that, there will be consequences. but there are basket cases like sweden where they are not doing that and it's not just scandinavia, it's the wider europe. there are areas in france, in germany's, in the united kingdom, any country that has had a substantial number of immigrants from muslim majority countries where you are seeing neighborhoods that have become women free zones. and these women free zones are mainly working class, you know, women who are affected in this way and first it was immigrantis

women and we've had this debate and activism and it took quite a bit of time to convince these people and say, you know, genital mutilation, not all women are being affected in the public space but mainly working-class women. it is really -- the big picture story is that our elected officials in europe are really failing to manage these large movement of people. and we are not having those conversations. here we are. >> tucker: i hope your book will start that conversation. thank you very much. congrats on your book. >> tucker, thank you very much for having me. >> tucker: pete buttigieg is little, but he's deep, a manat with deep thoughts. now that he secretary of

transportation, the nation's road ands we always are railways are the pen and paper of his mind. we'll share that with you if you can handle them. that's straight ahead.

♪ piano playing ♪ ♪ “what the world needs now” ♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope help now at redcross.org

>> announcer: and now, deep thoughts with mayor pete. >> it's not a glamorous issue, but the shape of our democracy is the issue that affects every other issue. >> tucker: that was the elfin pete buttigieg, professional barack obama impersonator. the rest of the world did not recognize his insight, pete buttigieg is a secretary transportation now, the most coveted job in all of america.

already secretaryre pete is transporting us into another world, a world where everyone is free to walk in the middle of the highway. >> what's the biggest way that personal trepidation has been changed by the pandemic? >> it's soon to say, but the patterns are not going to be exactly theow same. what about bikes, scooters, wheelchairs for that matter? >> those are things you plan to take more attention to? >> exactly. the roads aren't only for vehicles but we have to make sure that businesses can all coexist on the same roadway. >> tucker: sorry, man, they aren't for vehicles. businesses leave and highways too. mark steyn likes the sidewalk. what do you make of this, mark? >> he is deep. he was perishing and because it

turns out our democracy was not quite as shapely as it ought to have been. so i'm with him on that. what he meansns here, i have no idea. i assume somewhere in the back of his mind he's thinking that i-95 could be turned into one giant wheelchair ramp for seniors from andrew cuomo's blood-soaked old folks homes fleeing new york foror florida. that would be a transfer to idea or a young cabinet minister trying to make his mark at the department of transportation. that would be great. i'm all in favor of that. >> tucker: ada accessible interstate highways, that's the future? >> i think so. you already have bicycle lanes down the middle of town roads. why not have that also on interstate highways? the bike path-ization of

america, he's on it. >> tucker: that's so deep. great to see you. we'll be back tomorrow.or thank you, mark. the enemy that's the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. sean hannity next. thank you. >> sean: this is a fox news alert. welcome to "hannity." tonight, the unconstitutional schiff show, if you haven't been watching the proceedings, didn't miss much. so far house impeachment managers played a heavily edited clip of president trump from january 6th and of course they conveniently left out the part where he told the crowd to peacefully, patriotically let your voice be heard. now the impeachment managers want you i to believe that it wasn't just the presidents january 6th speech that decided the