very much. well, that's it for us tonight. we are moving on. back tomorrow night. 8 p.m. the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think. sean hannity takes over. >> sean: it's traumatic for the audience. you did it again. you found another reason to do it. >> i had no idea it was coming. sean: it's traumatic for the audience. >> i'm sorry. sean: you're not sorry. >> a little bit. sean: a little bit. humpty-dumpty never got more promotion in his life.om thankk you, tucker. welcome to "hannity." tonight we are tracking multiple breaking scores including horrific details from the 6th woman accusing andrew cuomo of sexual misconduct. a report from the albany times union out tonight.

this staffer not named yet was allegedly assaulted inside the governor's private residence while she was on location to fix an issue with his mobile phone. she claims he shut the door and fondle t her body under her blouse. governor cuomo is denying the allegation but if true this could spell the end for governor andrew cuomo. plus the latest from our crisis at the wide open southernd border. our investigative team is back on the ground at the border tonight in the great state of arizona. the way, senator mark kelly, where are you on this crisis that is emerging. are you denying it's a crisis also? the people of arizona deserve to know. and later, we'll have a full report on the democrats' latest efforts to destroy your second

amendment and this is not a test. this is indeed a clear and present danger to your second amendment rights. a but 1st, just after 9:00 p.m. on the east coast, 6:00 p.m. on the west coast, that means it's approximately, oh, two hours or so after joe biden's beddie time, he's likely fast asleep after what's been a very long and exhausting week for the president. yesterday, he managed to have one agenda item and hold one public event. again today, just one very short scripted speech where he was struggling to keep his focus on theg tiny little letters and words in the teleprompter. just look specifically -- look at his eyes here. he's h digging in deep locking , not locking out, just to get through those prepared remarks. joe, does one event a day -- kind of looks like he needs a nap, desperately.

of course, still no press conference, still no joint address to congress. that would be called the state of the union. still, his vice president, vice president kamala harris, is taking solo calls with world leaders, that's the commander-in-chief's job. according to a generous fluff piece in politico, the biden blitz is coming. it's now coming. this article claiming biden has been hunkered down for weeks not because he's struggling cognitively or weak or frail or incapable of speaking completely coherently but because he's had to organize the vaccination distribution plan, you know, the one that donald trump had already organized and handed over to him along with threee different vaccines? trump gave him those, too. and joe, truth be told, had absolutely nothing to do withnd the $1.9 trillion schumer/pelosi payoff bill. joe didn't write it nor did he negotiate it, but now get ready,

america, because politico claims that biden will probably hold more public events in coming weeks including tomorrow's primetime speech about covid-19 and, of course, the upcoming state of the union address. now, let me make a prediction. joe's been practicing probably all week for the speech tomorrow night. he'll do fine. it'll be a short 15-minute rah-rah we're doing great speech and turning the corner and then it'll be tomorrow. he practiced all day today. it'll be a short, scripted speech. they'll make the font really, really big so he doesn't really have to squint and dial in the way we saw today as much as usual and joe will probably also, yeah, he could survive the state of the union address. if we're going to be honest and completely truthful, it's probably the easiest speech anyone's ever giving, because you read two lines and then you pause for all of the applause and then you read three more lines and then you pause for all the applause. it's actually perfectly suited

for joe. slow, comfortable pace for joe biden, perfectly suited for somebody that is frail and weak and struggling cognitively. sure, they'll probably get a bigger prompter than usual, and, of course, after inadequate performance during both of those -- after an adequate performance during both of those speeches, people will say, sure, hannity! he did fine. there's only one problem, anyone with eyes and ears could see and hear that joe is not totally fine.se our sources close to the white house are describing how complete panic has set in all things biden's world. yesterday's brand-new rasmuse 'em poll revealing half of the country is now worried that -- rasmussen poll revealing half of the country is now worried that joe biden is not up to the job. a brand-new op ed in the "washington times" reads, "it's time to question biden's mental health. " this is why we got that biden team, leaked the fluff piece to

politico about the so-called behind blitz. let me be clear. there won't be a blitz. remember the hardware story yesterday? here is a hammer. mr. president, will you answer the question? all right, thank you, guys of g. we have to go. it'll be that kind of a blitz. president trump talked too much to the press every night. multiple public, unscripted events. by the way, i don't think donald trump was ever asleep before 1:00 a.m. during his entire privacy and i -- presidency and i doubt he slept over five hours his entire life. that was a blitz. the so-called biden blitz on the other hand will consist of him giving a few speeches written by his staff kept relatively short along with heavily orchestrated and controlled public outings, but it won't matter, we can already see that joe lost, if he ever had one, his fast ball, his curve ball, knuckle ball and even his slow pitch.

we actually have real video to compare joe biden in 2012 and joe biden in 2016 versus joe biden from just the last three weeks. this is only video of joe from the last three weeks and you compare it to 2012 and 2016 and as always, we let you decide. >> he sent me 2 letters saying by the way can you send me some stimulus money for companies here in the state of wisconsin? we sent millions of dollars. >> you know, the idea that, hmmm -- carry a card with me every day with the full number of folks. >> sean: now they have a new plan, it won't trust you anymore. follow your instincts. >> i want to thank the former general. i keep calling him general. my guy -- the guy who runs that outfit over there.

i want to make sure we thank the secretary. >> they put one foot in front of the other. they keep going. w that's the unbreakable spirit of the people of america. that's who we are. >> and representatives, hmmm, shirley jackson green and garcia. excuse me. pinell -- what am i doing here? i am going to lose track. >> sean: lose track again. we will ask the question the media mob is afraid to ask but know is happening. what is going on with the president of the united states of america joe biden. is there something medically wrong here? we the people have enough to know. i've hadeo enough of people telling me, hannity, you need to be a little bit more compassion

for joe. i've got compassion. it's painful to watch. this is supposed to the leader of the free world. this is supposed to be our commander-in-chief. it's the hardest job on earth which is where the media job and big tech should not have created what i described as the candidate protection program. he's either up to the task of this program or not and it matters big time for the entire world. now, you want to talk about compassion? i want to argue that compassion should have come from all the people around joe biden that knew of his struggles and worked overtime to hide and cover up all of this and purposefully hide vital information about a presidential candidate from you, the american peopledi. where was their compassion for joe? like for example, joe's friends media mob. they had no problem raising cognitive concerns about ronald

reagan and john mccain. let's take a look at this report from the associated press. again, you decide. >> if he wins the general election, he'll be the oldest person to assume the presidency. >> he's getting on the upper end of the comfort zone for americans who wonder whether he's going to have sort of the vigor and the health as president. >> mccain's opponent, barack obama, will soon be 47. an associated press yahoo! poll suggests that mccain's advanced sage more of an issue for -- age is more of an issue for voters than obama's views. >> there were more questions raised about ronald reagan in 1984. "the washington post" openly wondered if reagan had lost his "old fire with age." an article in the "new york times" titled "the age issue" claimed reagan's advisers knew he was struggling and, "thisdv s why they keep him out of press conferences as much as possible." age may have been a factor in his faltering performance.

so one question: what does the "new york times" have to say about joe biden being kept away from the press? watch this. >>e if i didn't -- [indistinct talking in the background] come on, press we're going move out. let's go, press. >> mr. president, can you pass voting rights with the filibuster in its current form do you think? >> i can talk to you about that later. >> mr. president, whatever happened to your promise from seven weeks ago -- >> come on, peter, thank you. bye-bye. thank you. >> mr. president, what will you unveil your build back better plan? >> thank you. >> thank you. thank you. thank you. and i'm happy to take questions if that what i'm supposed to do, me to whatever you want do. [beep] >> so who made that decision to go to bars and tone?

well, the "new york times" and "washington post" or the a.p. actually report on joe biden'sy obvious struggles or are these outlets just a propaganda waiting for the democratic party which i've been telling you they are for a long time. the question and the answer is obvious. now, in the meantime, americanss deserve to know. you, the american people, have a right to know who is really in charge here, because if you're looking at 1600 pennsylvania avenue, well, the lights are on. they're always onn, but it appears tonight we could report that no one really seems to be at home. hear with reaction is author of thee best seller "fire is brand" florida congressman matt gaetz and fox news contributor dan bongino. dan, we'll start with you tonight. the book comes out and it says that the strategy of the biden campaign was to keep the crazy uncle hidnent basement. that was their strategy.

the media mob, big tech, protected him and went on the tack for him against all things -- on the attack for him against all things donald trump. now, the question is if he's struggling cognitively, do we have a right to know? is it a legitimate question to ask who knew what and when? and why didn't you tell the ican people? >> hell yeah it's a legitimate question and a national security concern. if we have a cognitively impaired president of the united states a fingertip away from the nuclear codes, is that not the most important question? is there another question that matters right now? it's the critical question. couple things on this i just want to make points on here. number one, the media knew, so anybody telling you during the campaignyb that people in the media were unaware of the condition of joe biden because it's worse than you know,

they're lying to you so let's throw that out of there. there's a couple indicators of how bad things are. i'll get to one of them now. did you notice, sean, given my prior line of work, i can sense patterns in presidencies. i worked for three of them. you notice there's no otr's, off the record movements, with joe biden. it's relatively through. off the record movements are unscripted movements. obama would pop into a five guys and order a burger. notice you don't see many of those with biden? why do you think that is? because biden doesn't like burgers? no, it's because they need everything scripted all the time because god forbid he goes off script and gets asked a question, he doesn't have the capacity to answer ithe or they don't trust him to. >> sean: matt gaetz, never known you to be anything other than a fire brand. what's your take on all of this? >> dan mentioned the nuclear codes. it's worth voting that democrats on m the house armed services committees have actually sought to democratize those codes so joe biden wouldn't have the

authority to be able to launch a first strike in hisis current condition and, look, biden is our president. we want him to be well. we hope he's well, but we also have eyes. i remember the 2012 campaign, they would say "fired up, ready for joe." now it's more like "ready for nap time." if donald trump was the gold standard of presidencies, joe bide cent silver alert of presidencies -- biden is the silver alert of presidencies. >> sean: i think we might be down to copper. >> youte see what happened to te biden dogs. they sent the biden family dogs back to delaware. if that's what they'll do to the dogs, imagine what they'll do to joe biden. joe f they offer to take you to -- joe f they offer to take you to the farm back in wilmington, don't go. they might not mean it. >> sean: it's painful to watch. i know peopleo -- i actually defended, by the way, i did not want the family dog member euthanized. i went on the record last night on that. look, nobody -- it's painful to see. i'm just being blunt, dan

bongino, i don't take any joy. this is the president of the united states of americae here, but this is also nuclear codes. this is the leader of the free world. this is our commander-in-chief, and i'm hoping that it's nothing.r- now, james clyburn was on with neil cavuto yesterday and actually suggested well, he may have an issue with stuttering. the only problem is he didn't have it in 2016 or 2012. >> yeah. >> sean: and when did this "problem" start to emerge? so i don't like the fact that other people would put him in that position and secondly, on the other hand, i don't like our enemies -- and we have plenty of them, russia, china, iran, north korea to start -- thinking we are as a country being led by someone that is struggling like this. >> yeah, yeah. yes to number one. there's nothing funny about this. this is -- this is -- you're looking at a strategy in live

time. number one. number two, to reiterate my prior point, yes, this is a national security issue! let me add china, russia, our enemies, let me add isis, al-qaeda and others. you think they're not watching this? the man is clearly collapsing sean. the cognitive conditions deteriorate in an exponential fashion, in other words t gets bad really, really fast. we're only two months in. how is he going last another three years plus? we're only two months in. .>> >> sean: i want american president toesn succeed. socialism -- presidents to succeed. socialism will fail but i want american presidents strong and successful. that's it for the safety and the success of the country. thank you very much, gentlemen. now to the border, every single day, the crisis -- yes, it's a crisis -- it getting worse and worse.

an adviser was rolled out to address the ever-going crisis -- yes, crisis. unfortunately for joe, she accidentally admitted the truth. how'd that happen? that is policies are causing the crisis. take a look. >> would you describe what is happening on the border as a crisis given how these numbers are spiking so much week by week? >> you know, i think the -- i really -- i'mee not trying to be cute here, but i think the fact of the matter is we have to do what we do regardless of what anybody calls the situation and whatever you call it wouldn't change what we're doing. >> do you think it's a coincidence as soon as trump and his immigration policy was on the way out and biden and his immigration policy is on the way in, the historic surge at the border started ? >> we've seen surges before. surges tend to respond to hope and there was a significant hope for a more humane policy after

fourur years of pent-up demand. so i don't know whether i would call that a coincidence. >> sean: a rare moment of truth amid a pack of lies. joining us now with an actual report from the border in tucson, arizona, tonight, last week in texas, fox news contributor, investigative reporter sara carter is with us. sara, you've been out all day. tell us what is going on and compare the differences between texas and arizona. >> reporter: well, i got to tell you, sean, border patrol agents here out in arizona and the border patrol union are warning this is a serious crisis, not just what we talked about last week, the humanitarian crisis where we see the surge of young people crossing into the united states over the texas/mexico border, but here, there's been an exponential increase in our narcotics trafficking because of that what is happening here is we have an enormous drug war on the other side of the border.

sinaloa controlling this area where we're at in arizona that borders mexico. our agents are spread so thin dealing with young people, the drug cartels are using the open spaces because thege biden administration basically halted the continuation of the border wall. they're using those open spaces to bring those drugs in i spent the day with art dequeto, vice president of the southwest region for the national border patrol council. here's what he had to say? >> what cartel controls this territory? >> this being northern sonora just south of us, the sinaloa cartel is in charge of this area. >> reporter: pablo guzman has been -- >> his people but now there's a drug -- there's a serious drug war going on just southle of us with two different factors that are fighting each other for control of this area. those drugs are not just affecting the border. those drugs are going into middle america.

they're going all over the country affecting kids. t there's a true epidemic in this country when it comes to high school kids and heroin and it's coming through this border. >> reporter: oh yeah, now they crawled all the way to the end of this road -- >> and you can see where that mountain ends up there? >> reporter: right. >> that's smugglers -- that's called smuggler's gulch. over there is smuggler's canyon. >> reporter: you're seeing an increase in cuban? >> people think it's central americans and all of those issues but you're getting people from all over the place that are coming through here. >> reporter: i've heard romania? >> everywhere. romania and pakistan and you don't know who they are and again >, the big issue is whoe you not apprehending? because they don't operate on a budget. they don't have a budget. you't don't know how much they'e putting into organizations to come bring people across and my biggest fear is obviously not

who we're apprehending but it's who we're not apprehending and america needs to understand that. >> reporter: sean, shortly after we left the area near smuggler's canyon, over 60 people were apprehended coming into the country from the border on where we were at. i got a number on the got-aways. they're guesstimating on how many. this year alone, 39,000 got-aways is what they're estimating, possibly even closer to 40,000 and i want to you think about this, where we were gnat texas in the del rio sector, he estimated 17,000 got-aways this year. this is a crisis in arizona. it's a crisis they want the american people to understand and know about and just remember, not everyone is coming from central america. we've got people from all over the world.ce >> sean: the cdc said

americans should not travel to central america right now. you see a lot of these images. no social distancing and no masks. one town in texas, 25% positive rate for covid and then you still haven't had access to the cargo containers were children are being held with the tiny window with bars on it and butterflies supposedly on the walls. no one will let us in. is that true? >> reporter: that is true and i've been talking to a lot of sources on the ground, both in federal law enforcement and people in the area where those cargo containers are and they have been told in absolutely no circumstances that any photographs are supposed to be leaking from there. they're watching it like a hawk. the dh is very careful and, remember, mayorkas refuse to call this a crisis but he's now asking for volunteers to come help out at the border. go figure? you can imagine the frustration of the federal agents and the border patrol officials as well as dea, f.b.i. and everybody else working along this border. >> sara carter, investigative

reporter at the border is again reporting for us. newsg. you won't get from the media about the border crisis. coming up, senator cruz called the start of his administration, he said three words, boring but radical. senator cruz is next. stay with us. g but radical. he is next. stayayayayay

>> sean: now, texas senator ted cruz summed up the biden presidency this week, well, he summed it up simply: boring but radical. for example, biden's open borders, immigration policies prioritizing amnesty over law enforcement, the laws of the land that are currently the law of the land. theaw remain-in-mexico policy is now gone. catchh and release now back.

wall construction is gone. jobs in america are now lost. migrant surges are back and bigger than ever and it b all ps us one step closer to becoming ass i've been predicting the united sanctuary states of america and biden and the democrats passed the $1.9 trillion spending package filled with far left pet projects and bail outs for failed blue states thatlo overtax, overspending and by the way don't fund their pensions. people in redov statesnd that et responsible governors andnd legislatures will be paying the price. you'll be paying the price. instead of focusing on covid relief for struggling americans and by the way, last but not least, pelosi's hr1 voting overhaul is a complete assault on the integrity of our elections.hr it'll mean mass mail-inn voting, more ballot harvesting, zero voter i.d., legalizing voting

for convicted felons sending federal dollars to fund cam expanse will create the perfect storm -- campaigns and will create the perfect storm for violating the election with no confidence or integrity. joe biden blind all of it -- joe biden behind all of it. our u.s. constitution read: the times, place and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature. that means state legislatures determine how elections are run in their states and this has judge shopping on top of all of it. sure let's rig the court system. here with reaction current texas senator ted cruz.

now my question for you is let's start with hr1 is that unconstitutional that it granted on the state legislature? it usurps the power of the constitution grants state legislatures? >> hr1 is called the universal voter fraud law. came out of the last election where we saw multiple instances of serious allegations of voter fraud and the democrats and the media took on the talking points that voter fraud doesn't exist, that anyone who says it exists is somehow engaged in a conspiracy theory and now with hr1, the democrats are seeking to lock in their advantage. they want mail-in balloting everywhere. they want no photo i.d., so you can go in -- if, sean f you want to go in and tell the -- sean, if you want to go in and tell the registrar your name is eric holder and in d.c., they asked

for eric holder's ballot and they gave it to him. you can do that the democrats made anth incredibly cynical decision which is they believe they benefit from voter fraud and they're trying to take this moment of time -- and i think this momented of time iss limitd -- but right now they have the white house and both houses of congress and they're trying to take this moment of time and lock their controlol in permanently by changing the rules so they can manipulate and steal election results. hr1 undermines election integrity it shows -- there's a reason it's hr1. look, the number one priority of democrats is keep democrats in power. that matters more to them than covid or matters more to them than jobs or matters more to them than kids in school. they want to stay in power and this is all about stopping the voters from voting them out of office. it's a very dangerous bill. >> sean: boring but radical

kind of sums it up. explain. >> well, you know, you think about the last two months. i think joe biden made a political decision and it probably i was pretty good political -- was a pretty good political decision to be pretty boring. the last four years, donald trump was. anything but boring. every day, donald trump drove the news. what he said, what he tweeted, whatever happened. joe biden came in and said we're not going to do that. think about how many days in the last two months can you remember anything that biden said? he doesn't do press conferences. he doesn't say much of anything. he's as boring as paint dry and he's doinghe that on purpose. i think there are a lot of folks that are kind of relieved. they're kind of relieved not to have the drama. they're kind d of relieved not o be worried about the president said that day but it is all a subterfuge, all a mask designed toes hide what is an incredibly radical policy agenda. if you look at the cabinet nominees biden has put forward, they're extreme. take a look at this

$1.9 trillion porkulous bill the democrats forced through. they could have passed a bipartisan bill. last year we passed five bipartisan bills through congress. republicans were more than ready to roll up our sleeves and go to work on getting people back to work on distributing vaccines helping overcome through this crisis. democrats said we have zero interest we want to pay off all our buddies. we want to spend trillions of dollars and we want to adopt radical policies. let me point to three amendments we voted on late at night and republicans fought all night. we fought 24 hours against this. one amendment is an amendment i joined with bill that said the $1,400 stimulus checks shouldn't go to criminals, to violent criminals in prison. every single democrat voted against that. so under this bill, murderers, rapists, child molester who hase in prison are about to get a

$1,400 check from the u.s. taxpayers. that's how extreme the democrats are. i introduced another amendment that said we shouldn't send the checks to illegal aliens. if you're here illegally u shouldn't get a $1,400 check. again, every single democrat voted against it and said we want to send the checks to illegal aliens and then a third example, one of the most extreme provisions in this porkulous bill is an agriculture bill which says if you're a a farmer that's got a agriculture loan and you have from a disadvantaged ethnic or racial group, your loan will be for given. not just for given, but it'll be forgiven at the rate of 120%, 20% more than you owe is what will be forgiven and under the terms of the provision, there's no means testing, no tests on income or no tests on wealth so a minority billionaire farmer who has a loan, who happens to

be african-american or hispanic or asian has their loan forgiven and a poor white farmer doesn't qualify. you know, sean, i'm hispanic. i joke with my colleagues. i needar to get me a damn farm because apparently they're shoveling out cash in a blatantly illegal unconstitutional manner. that's how radical the democrats are right now. >> sean: last quick question. 30 seconds left. you've known joe biden for years. am i wrong in my assessment? he seems weak, frail and cognitively struggling? >> i think he's slowed down some, but i think he wants to be president. i think he's going to serve his full term. but i also think he's unwilling to stand up to the hard left. he's not willing to tell bernie sanders and elizabeth warren and a.o.c., he's scared of the angry left. they're the ones driving this agenda. as bad as it's been in the first two months, it's getting more and more and more radical. that's really dangerous for the country.

but here is the good news, the worse they get,, the more it wakes people up and i believe, sean, we're going to have a fantastic 2022 election and a fantastic 2024 election! >> sean: i agree on that final point. thank you, senator cruz. thank you for being with us. when we come back, democrats continue their assault on your second amendment rights. we'll explain. dana loesch weighs in next. ccee♪ ♪ and so are lost for good ♪ ♪ and some of them are pretty flawed ♪ ♪ and some of them are slightly odd ♪ ♪ but many are small businesses that simply lack the tool ♪ ♪ to find excited people who will stop and say 'that's cool'♪ ♪ and these two, they like this idea ♪ ♪ and those three like that one.♪ ♪ and that's 'cause personalized ads ♪ ♪ find good ideas for everyone ♪

now, simparica trio simplifies protection. ticks and fleas?

see ya! heartworm disease? no way! simparica trio is the first chewable that delivers all this protection. and simparica trio is demonstrated safe for puppies. it's simple: go with simparica trio. this drug class has been associated with neurologic adverse reactions, including seizures; use with caution in dogs with a history of these disorders. protect him with all your heart. simparica trio.

♪ piano playing ♪ ♪ “what the world needs now” ♪ the only thing a disaster can't destroy is hope help now at redcross.org all right, now we're learning more tonight about the democrats' antisecond amendment agenda webo tried to warn you before the election. the house is now set to vote on bills this week to expand gun background checks. you know, we already have background checks, prompting strongec pushback from conservatives and republicans

alike who explain it's really just part of the larger effort to restrict our second amendment rights to firearms and, of course, interrace crease governments surveil -- increase government surveillance of gun owners. there's chip roy earlier today laying it all out on the house floor. take a look. >> now, my democratic colleagues, after defunding the police, opening up our borders want to take away our god-given rights, yes, god-given right to defend ourselves under the second amendment. that's what this is about. this is about creating a gun registry to track guns of the american people. there is no way to implement what the democrats are trying to implement without doing that. >> sean: joining us with reaction is syndicated radio hostng dana loesch and fox and friends cohost pete. we're all advocates for the second. i -- for the second amendment. i'm a pistol marksman.

i've been one since i was 10 years old when they said you could only have seven bullets in a magazine, i went to seven bullets. i obey all the laws. they changed itt back. the point is it is so restrictive in states like new york already, where do you see this going? >> yeah, sean, that's a great point, and really, you know, come to texas. we're a little more freer here, although there's some states around texas doing a little bit better than we are with second amendment rights. i hate saying that, heaven forbid, but to your point, these two pieces of legislation that looks like they're going to get voted on, at least the procedural stuff tomorrow, hr8 and hr1446, i think, and it's looking at just what congressman chip roy said there. you can't -- you can't have criminalized private transfers and not't have a gun registry. what you talked about, sean, the limit on magazine capacity, i mean, i wouldn't be shocked if they tried to pass something like that, although i think it's unconstitutional. i know there's a lot of legal

precedent on this. but, you know, people could also just swap out mags. i could swap a mag out in less than a second, right? i can do it one-mannedded in less than a second. you carry multiple magazines which i shouldn't have to because we're americans but then you also have hr8, the one, i think, sheila jackson lee and james clyburn are behind. that's also -- you have the criminalization of private transfers. they want to expand the waiting period to 10 days. a right delayed is a right denied. i think some -- at some point, we're going to have some sort of compromise on rights, maybe possibly get through the senate, and i hate even saying those words out loud. >> sean: i don't know where the compromise is pete, pete, after laws have changed, i had to literally melt down guns that i own and buy other guns that meet o the new standards. oftentimes, they're only cosmetic differences any way and nobody seems to know what they're talking about in washington as it relate toes any gun.

-- as relates to any gun. >> i'veut had to do the same thing, sean, moving state to state. you put a pin in it and change the husbandle and now suddenly it's illegal and now -- muzzle and now suddenly is illegal and now it's legal. no doubt. the democrats want a bureaucrat between and you your right to bear arms. the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. dana is right, the democrats are focusing in on that. right blind that is another -- right behind that is another bill from sheila jackson lee that will create a national gun registry, federal government training course and psychological evaluations. the left doesn't believe in the second amendment. while they unlock our ballot box, they want to unlock it and open it up in every way, they want to lock and raid our gun cabinets becausek they don't believe in the second amendment. they're going for it. they don't have the votes right now though, sean. do theye go with the filibuste?

they might on an issue like this and an issue like hr1. that's what makes it so serious. .>> sean: remember, kamala harris says she'll use executive orders. i assume she'll encourage joe. i kind of suspect she's got a lot of influence to use executive action. we'll keep our eyes on it. dana and pete, thank you. when we come back, pierce morgan hitting back hard tonight at woke and cancel culture after leaving "good morning britain." candice zones here with us and has -- owens is here with us and has reaction straight ahead.

>> sean: now pierce morgan walked off the set of his top-rated show, "good morning britain" this week and subsequently left the show. new report says meghan markel formally complained to itv, the

network, after morgan's criticism of markel's comments during her sit down with oprah winfrey. here is morgan earlier today responding back. take a look. >> i believe in freedom of erspeech. i believe in the right to be allowed to have an opinion. if people want to believe meghan markel, that's entirely their right. i don't believe almost anything that comes out of her mouth and i think the damage she's done to the british monarchy and to the queen at a time when prince phillip is lying in a hospital is enormous and frankly contemptible so if i have to fall on my sword for expressingt an honestly-held opinion about meghan markel and that diatribe of bilge she came out with in the interview so be it. >> sean: pierce morgan's comments are being investigated by s the united kingdom's media regulator off cam under their so-called harm and defense

rules. that's a government regulator. should you care about a it? in the democrat's hr1 overhaul bill, it makes it more partisan and create what would essentially be a speech czar chosen by the president who would be able to, well, basically pick and choose which campaign finance laws get enforced and against whom and even a truth detector about ads raising concerns about, yes, silencing a political speech, so what is going on across the pond may not be as distant as it seems now. it is dangerous. it is destructive. but unfortunately, it's not at all surprising and is it's right in line -- and it's right in line with the democrats' far left censorship agenda. here with reaction is candace owens. i happen to like pierce. he's a fun dude.

i wish he would have stayed because it was interesting television. i was -- i find it compelling to watch and i can't stand anything about the royals. it's their thing, not mine. i respect it. here's the question, government regulators? hr1 would have, what? fact checkers of ads? who will fact check the fact checkers, candace? >> that's right, unfortunately in the united kingdom, they don't have first amendment rights. i hope this story shows americans why it's so important to have first amendment rights. pierce morgan was all of us when he was dressing down meghan markel and calling her out on the blatant lies she's told. she can't even keep her story straight by the way. if anyone remembers three years ago she said on a panel she doesn't read newspapers or check social media because she doesn't like to read stories about her. apparently that's not true because she's now telling everybody she was suicidal because of bad press and because of racism, even though she's not even, you know, you look at her and youth wouldn't be able to discern just by looking at

meghan markel she's black. what they're basically saying is you're not allowed to critique meghan markel. for her to put in this phone call to have his voice violenced because she's so unhappy about the press that's been sent about her which is being felt across the globe. she's a typical leftist understand thattist. it has to do with the typical leftist progressive in hollywood seeing something traditional and saying that thing has history and tradition. i'll call it racist. i have the grounds to call it racist because i'm 25% black. if you've seen a picture of archie and you believe he's suffered antiblack racism, then i'm a nigerian prince and give me your credit card details. it's so ridiculous. >> p sean: candace, i would like to think there are hateful, racist, bigoted people onn this earth. i would like to think it didn't happen. i don't know. you don't know. nobody knows, but the fact is i'm very worried about the language in hr1 and that what we

see over there could happen here. am i overreacting? >> you're not overacting. it's already happening here. the fact checkers, what's really going on? we've seenpe it in america alrey that the speech is starting to get tighterth and tighter. when you're starting to say you're not allowed to have an opinion -- forget a fact -- you're not allowed to have an opinion in his opinion, he believes meghan markel is lying. i agree with him. why aren't we allowed to have an opinion anymore with anyone telling us your opinion is not good? it's dangerous. >> sean: you want security and privacy and you live in a $15 million mansion, don't go on oprah. we're so happy about the baby for you. congratulations! >> thank you so much. >> sean: thank you. more hannity after this.ap

these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the services of the post office plus ups only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

♪ piano playing ♪ ♪ “what the world needs now” ♪

♪ is love, sweet love ♪ ♪ it's the only thing that there's just too little of ♪ ♪ what the world needs now is love, sweet love, ♪ ♪ no not just for some but for everyone.♪ >> sean: all right, tomorrow night, joe biden delivers his big primetime address. he's been practicing all week to you, the american people. i don't expect major blunders. practicing,n rehearsing all week long. he's going to knock that sucker

15-minute speech out of the park tomorrow! and people are going to say, see, hannity! he's fine.e.ow no, he's not. we'll always be independent, fair, balanced. we are not the media mob and let not your heart be troubled. here is laura! how are you, miss ingraham? > doing very well. i think biden will discuss the laws of physics and the laws of politics and privilege and i think it's going to be astounding and amazing. to be astounding and amazing. i'm going to look on the bright side. explain all the bills, all the legislation backwards and forwards. charts. >> sean: i think it shows our kids it's a good example, if you practice really, really hard over and over again you can do it. >> laura: we shall see, sean, thanks so much, we will see you tomorrow. i'm laura ingraham, this is "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight. his white privilege really at the heart of the while dustup? is there another insidious force at play