conservative governor. to take it away, tucker. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. you know what people care about most by what at the top of their to-do list. joe biden signed something called executive order on rebasing racial equity and support for underserved amenities. go out and see if you can figure out what it means. the document uses the term "equity" a total of 21 times and yet revealing weight never divines the word. biden never tells us, never even

hands. his order proclaims that america will beget "an ambitious hole of government agenda," but we aren't allowed to know what it is. that's odd. for three months we've been trying to guess, what is this equity that is now our country's main reason of the existing? we know it's not the same as equality or a closely related. in the name of equity, biden supports open discrimination against asian college graduates. we used to call that kind of behavior racism. we had laws against it.aw now we call it equity and we have laws demanding it. it turns out that racism and equity are pretty much the same thing. who knew? here's the latest illustration of the principal and it comes not from the biden administration but from united airlines. united used too be a conventionl air linent carrier, it flew airlines from place to place

most of times uneventfully. that was the old united airlines. the new united is very different. it's a combination of a hyperaggressive corporate hr department and a left-wing political action committee. the new united airlines is big on mandatory social engineering. united has embraced equity per here's its latest directives got out yesterday on twitter. "our flight deck should reflect the diverse group of people on board our plane's every day but that's what we plan for 50% of the 5,000 pilots we trained in the next decade to be women or people of color. end quote. united airlines is mandating affirmative action quotas and its you understand why they are doing it. they are hoping that by hiring more black executives, no one will ask just how many black americans have gotten diabetes from drinking coke. for coca-cola, equity is a merely a difference of p.r.

move. it makes sense be about airlines travel people in a thin middle to 35,000 feet off the ground. flying a commercial airliner is dangerous.s. like performing heart surgery, no matter how many times you've done it, it's inherently high-stakes. people die if you screw up. in the airline's business, as in medicine, not killing people is all that matters. so how will racial and gender quotas make united airlines safer?d that's the only airline that matters. the company ceo went on "cbs news" recently to explain. >> only 7% of united airlines pilots are women. one of the highest percentages in the industry. andry 13% of its pilots are peoe of color. >> they simply do not have the access or the opportunity. >> in an exclusive interview with cbs news, united ceo scott kirby is announcing a new effort to bring balance to the flight deck. >> proud to announce that the

united aviation academy to address the makeup of our structural issues with the makeup of our pilots. >> only 7% of united airline pilots are female. only 13% aren't white. okay. but why exactly should we care about those numbers? an airline pilot's job is to land the plane safely. everything else is irrelevant. if 100% of united airlines pilots were black women, or malaysian muslims come up for that matter white men from m alabama, not a single sane person would complain about it as long as the airplanes didn't crash. safety is all that matters pretty but you notice that the ceo of united didn't mention safety. safety is no longer the airlines top concern, the politics is. they don'tey dispute that characterization. in statements to the show two hours ago, they were ready disputed it. they are lying. we know they are lying and you know it too because in the airline business thereat is only

one standard that matters and it is not race and it is not gender, its competence. the way people look is totally irrelevant. how they perform is all you should care about. once you forget that, airplanes tend to crash. everyone knows that's true. very much including the people who run this country. many of them don't fly united, they don't fly commercial at all. they use net jets, the largest private airline in the world. have a embrace hiring quotas?k of course not. they'll tell you exactly what they are looking for in the airline pilots they hire. here's thehe first one. we seek individuals who demonstrate an unwavering dedication to safety. that's the first requirement on their list. couldn't find any mention of race oron gender, and that doest surprise you because once againa race and gender are literally irrelevant to who flies your airplane. nancy pelosi and john kerry and the rest of the private jet dependent ruling class know that

perfectly well. they will not be demanding quotas anytime soon. their families fly on that jets airplanes. if hiring on the basis of theri relevant criteria will over time get people killed, and it will, why are they me demanding it? because they don't care. they are ideologues suffering from an incurable brain disease called wokeness. reality means nothing to them but watch the new head of the doj's civil rights division, ironically a black supremacist called kristen clarke, admitted as much. as you told us a few years ago, equity is more important than safety. >> do you think that airlines should a apply the same diversiy rules you are calling for here? they shouldn't take people who score high latest on the pilot test but they should hire also on appearance, how people look? >> every workplace -- >> tucker: so you can say pilots should too? >> they should place a premium

on diversity. >> tucker: what's more important, the way you look at what you are capable of doing? if you're flying the plane, how important is it that you look like washed my >> incredibly important and it's also important that we place a premium on diversity. >> tucker: what you look like is an essential quality, it'sti incredibly important in an airline pilot. what are we watching here exactly? it's deluded but it's also pretty clearly a racial attack. kristen clarke is saying that the co united is saying that we need to replace the pilots flying airplanes because they are the wrong skin color. only diseased people think like this. imagine if we apply the same standard to other professions but how about professional sports? about 75% of the people in the players in the national baseball black men. l that doesn't sound like equity. it sounds like what kristen clarke refers to as disproportionate representation.

so what if to remedy the lack of equity the nba announced tomorrow that they are going forward and at least half of its players, 50%, had to be white, asian, hispanic, or female to better present the fans in the stands. how would we respond to that? we would understand immediately, and we would say so, that that is a racist policy. knowing even though wedge that nba players are doing a bad job, we all assume correctly, as we do with airline pilots, that they were hired in the first place because they were the best the company could find. but nevertheless they had to be replaced because they were the wrong race and gender. it's sick. you think it couldn't happen? why wouldn't it happen? by the logic of identity politics, it has to happen. nba players make a whole lot more than airline pilots. at some point someone's going to notice that. and that's the whole problem with this way of thinking, this disease way of thinking. you do not want to live in a completely racialized country were a person's genetics are the

most important thing about them. where you are reduced to your dna, dehumanized. but that's exactly the society they are creating. and what is the result of what they are doing? every action promotes a reaction. that's the most basic principle in physics. when your tech people for qualities they can't control, over time you will make them radical, that is guaranteed. you have to wonder if it occurred to the pushing this equity is garbage that everyone on earth has an identity. if you make identity politics mandatory, as they have, how long until you get why identity politics? you ever consider that, you reckless fools? how long until there is no national identity at all? only warring tribes fighting each other for the spoil? does anyone want to raise children in a society like that? only the racist ones beer that's exactly what they are pushing up on us at high speeds. a couple of years ago we reported that the federal aviation administration lowered

its standards to bring equity to air traffic control paired part of that initiative, the faa began to ministering something called a biographical questionnaire to applicants.ai this is significant to all people tended to believe that united or the u.s. military when they say that by bringing equity to the process they aren't lowering standards peer they are by definition. in the case of the faa they got mostly as and high school. they said they did, they got five points for as. candidates were also as it they had been unemployed the past three years and if they answered yes to that question, they got tenwe points. they got double the points were three years of unemployment as they did for getting straight as. how does that make us safer? that's a rhetorical question, obviously. it divides endangers us, but that's equity. michael peterson is an attorney and former air traffic controller whose following this very closely and happy to have them on. thank you for coming on. i do not think -- >> thank you, tucker.

>> nobody caresar at all what their airline pilot looks like or has a problem with airline pilots that look like them or think people that look like them can fly airlines. nobody thinks that. everybody is worried about the safety of air travel, however. how is this going to make air travel safer? >> it's not going to make air travel safer. it is a non sequitur. as you said but no one cares about the external characteristics of a safety occupation. you simply care about can they do their job and are they the best? this is nothing more than a very transparent attempt by united in this game of corporate one-upsmanship, the ugly specter of political correctness has invaded every area of our society and now it's invading or infecting areas that should be sacrosanct. you are a surgeon. doesn'tit matter what color your surgeon is. doesn't matter what color your aircraft controller is. doesn't matter what color your pilot is.s. there are members of all races and ethnicities that have the

qualifications to be the best. b is based a meritocracy and achieving the best. not only are they endangering the safety of people, they are reducing the incentive for peopleg to achieve. when you look at that from a long-term basis especially in any safety occupation, whether it is medicine, whether it is air pack traffic control or whether it's flying an airplane as we've beenla discussing the last 4-5 minutes, it's absolutely insane to pander to the pc culture. >> tucker: because any time you take your eye off the goal, you supplant the goal with a new goal. so your goal when you fly an airplane to be the land safely. i'm not a pilot. you tell me. is there another goal, should there be? >> every other airline has a mandate for safety. ironically i looked at united's website this morning, actually.

not in preparation for their show. i got an email from you not talking f about this policy. first thing i did was hop on their website. 36% of the board of directors are women. 30% of their officers, 30% are a women. less percentages for diversity. so while at the very top united is populated by white males, they are looking to actually infuse the workforce with people based not upon their capabilities and qualifications, but based upon the way they look. it's exceedingly dangerous.di frankly i think it's against the law. there is regulation out there that says airlines cannot engage in any form of discrimination not granted by the ada, by the way. g don't want to get too far off topic. but there's all kinds of reasons not only practical of any sense of justice and fair play, it

affects anyone who flies except forec the elites where they can hire anyone they want to be a pilot and fly them around in ate public jet.je this affects every body and people ought to be concerned a about it. >> tucker: i don't care if 100% of pilots are transgender sumatras as long as they are the best. do you believe united when they say that, yes, we have affirmative action quotas but we aren't going to lower their standards. do you believe that? >> not at all. united, the flight academy, they change the name of it. it's here in phoenix, arizona, they still charge student between $87,000 a year to go and finish the program. united set aside $1.2 million for scholarships. that means of the 2500 they want to hire a bye diverse population, they are going to pay for 17 of those.

now united also got somewhere around $5 billion in federal bailout money. that's doing the math as i literally say it, that's less than two tenths of 1% of the funds going toward helping diverse populations. and in either event, there are people of all colors, both genders certainly that have the capabilities to be thede best. this consistent and constant pandering affects us all. and it needs to stop. >> tucker: we have to fight for the color-blind meritocracy. i appreciate you coming on. >> nice talking to you, tucker. have a nice night. >> tucker: last that we talk to the governor of arkansas asa hutchinson but we asked if he was influenced by corporate interests. he gave us one answer and we learned today it wasn't true but we will tell you how we know.

we'll be right back.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: last time we talk to the governor of arkansas, the republican called asa hutchinson, he vetoed a bill

that banned the chemical castration of children in arkansas. we asked him why he did w that d he was gracious enough to come on and explain. it became clear that governor hutchinson hadn't done a lot of research into the topic. there were a lot of things he didn't seem to know. in februaryy i'm one of the oldest medical journals inbr the world summarized researcher's findings on puberty blockers, the chemicals at the heart of this debate. here's what they found. "puberty block is used to treat children 12-15 with persistent gender dysphoria had no sisignificant effect on the psychological function, thoughts of self harm or body image but as expected, the children experience reduced growth, height, bone strength. there is that, to give in mind, but a governors said the children needed these drugs did not become clinically depressed by the state suggest the drugs don't help, the only her children's bodies. others studies conducted that found that puberty blockers in fact increased instances of self

harm and suicidal ideation in some children. those aren't the only studies i have found that. days ago, britain's national institute of health and care excellence determined that there is "very low evidence supporting the idea that puberty blockers shouldsu be given to minors." the limited research we do have suggest that permanent life altering treatments don't make gender dysphoria any better, in fact those drugs may make it worse. the most thorough peer review study on the topic was conducted in sweden. researchers followed the outcomes of people who had undergone the surgery which the arkansas bill bands for minors. 10-15 years after they underwent resubmit the suicide rate for your patients in sweden jumped by more than 2000%. how is that a victory? it's not. it's a tragedy. we asked asa hutchinson about any research he might have read that contradictedh these facts. he didn't point to any pure he clearly didn't read anything that contradict those facts and that led us to wonder, how

exactly was asa hutchinson convinced that vetoing this bill was a good idea? you clearly not familiar with the research so my question is have you spoke to any of the big companies in arkansas about this? have you taken any calls from tysons come at the dillard's, to walmart? has anyone of the companies called you about this bill? >> no. >> tucker: i want to be clear about this, have you spoken to any corporate interest in the state of arkansas about this bill? >> tucker, i answered that. i entered that question, and i said, no, i have not. >> tucker: asa hutchinson was quite definitive on the and we had to take his word on it. he was very in fact, no i haven't. but it looked like he was, how do we put it, lying. the dayth we spoke to asa hutchinson, the walton family endorse his decision to veto the bill that passed the arkansas legislature. the walton family is not just any family, it's the richest family in the world and the most

powerful family in the state of arkansas. they control walmart and sam's club. they wanted asa hutchinson to exactlyt he had done t what they wanted him to do. "we support governor i didn't hudgins sends reason veto. any policy that limits individual opportunity also limits our states potential. ." walmart is going to sell a lifetime supply of drugs to trans youth, it'd be nice if he vetoes any legislation like it. it's possible that ada hutchinson ignored the what's interesting is his focusing is he knows hutchinson very well, confirming our worst fears, he would very much like a board seat at walmart when he leaves. just a few days ago, by the way, asa hutchinson appeared on this network to admit that before making any decision on transgender issues, he first considershe what, and we are quoting, what "major global corporations think."

>> we have some major global corporations here in arkansas. certainly worried about the image of our state. we are trying to send a signal that you can protect conscience, you can protect girls in sports without being discriminatory in trying to say we are not diverse and tolerant of different lifestyles. that's important for us as a state in what we have to achieve as a nation. >> tucker: oh. "we are the home of some major global corporations," governor hutchinsongo said, they worry about the image of the state peer they worry less about the children of the state if asa hutchinson had his way will continue to be chemically castrated by quack doctors but will be watching to see if asa hutchinson winds up on the board of walmart. we really will. large homeless encampments have formed at two schools in seattle including a middle school. the members of the school board are demanding that the mayor's

office keep the encampments in place. once again, a store you can believe is real but jason lancer of seattle is they are pretty brought us quick details. good to see you. >> good to see you, tucker. i toward the encampments a few days ago. this is one of the schools that is impacted. it's one not really far from the autonomous zone and it is attached to a park in the park serves as one of the ways that you get to this actual school and it's simply overrun with homeless. i will be honest, i lost count of theou amount of tents that ae in. 40, may be 50, there is trash absently everywhere. briefly followed by a homeless man with a metal pole that he was banging on his hand in the sort of way in spite of being careful, i managed to step on a syringe. thankfully no needle was attached, but imagine what's going toed happen with more kids showing up. right now you've got some kids they are, these are special

education students. but schools are set to reopen in washington state in just under two weeks. this internal email to the mayor that i was able to get my hands on, school board director zachary dewolfe asked for ideas on how to handle the situation that's happening there. but on no uncertain terms he said, a direct quote, this is not and ask for a sweep. the city was going to do a sweep anyway because they realize these people who are homeless are not taking up any offers of resource peer they aren't going into shelters. that's when publicly the school board president, her name is chandra hansen, put up a joint statement demanding that sweeps never be performed on school grounds adjacent or elsewhere. they put never in all caps, so they are very, very serious. >> tucker: this is dystopia that they've created. why do they believe that vagrants, the right of vagrants to live next to a school is more important than the right of kids not to step on syringes and be

hassled by fragrance, where did they get that idea? >> kids are privileged. they lived in the homes and thus they are not deserving of any special protections by people who are homeless through no fault of their own. this is not just happening here in seattle and not certainly happening that just the schools. look at the tent cities happening in the other ,washington, d.c. >> a city taken by someone, a friend of the show. that's probably 200 yards from the capitol in elm street under a bridge. you have toe. wonder, is nobody noticing this? this is the world they are creating. jason rantz, i welcome you for coming on tonight. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: we take hopeful and very interesting episode of our new digital show, "tucker carlson today," available at foxnation.com. fascinating conversation about where this country is going, to some of the smartest people we've talked to in a while.

preview straight ahead.

>> tucker: we shot the latest episode of "tucker carlson today" this afternoon. it's on foxnation.com. we spoke to a professor called wilford riley who teaches in kentucky at a historically black university. he's the author of the book among others, "taboo: ten facts you can't talk about." here's part of the conversation. let me ask you about, because i think it's a good way of framing what you do believe, a book that you wrote called "taboo." in it you make the point of all these things are true and someom things that are evidently true, demonstrably true we are allowed to say. give me ten facts, what are things that you believe are true that are not permitted in polite conversation. >> the book "taboo" because what

you call cancel culture today which is this idea that there are certain things that may be true that may even have very intense explanatory value that you aren't supposed to discuss in polite society. in the problem here is if you can't discuss the possible explanation for things, the very likely explanation for things in some cases, you end up having a nonproductive conversation with things that aren't very relevant bit sexism comes to mind in many situations, end up being labeled the total cause of everything that we are seeing. so the first chapter of the book looks at the black lives matter movement. i openly say i'm a black man, a proud one. i have a massive simply for the underlying goals, but i point out that many of the things they say are objectively not true. if you look at the claim that there is a very large number of murders, if you will, of african-american men by police, the turns out simply not to be true. the total number of unarmed

african-american males killed in generally disputed potential controversial shootings by police last year was about if i have the number correct 13. the total number of unarmed people, including the very large caucasian and hispanic majority we rarely talk about, that number was under 100. a full number of police shootings all in was under a thousand and the included people attacking the officer with a pistol or another firearm, a1, knife, a vehicle used as a weapon. that argument sibley didn't stand up. there wasn't a gigantic black-white discrepancy when you adjust for the crime rate in the total numbers for all groups combined was 100 or less. so those were the facts and i went on to interracial crime in general and i think that this is something the media and all political sides really emphasize because the failure of masculinity, if you will, or planes crashing out of the skies, animal attacks, one of

the things that terrify people. we see a lot of things about warriors of the other race attacking people, it's ugly. turns out this very rarely happens. there is an annual document that summarizes the victim reporting crime in the usa that we call the justice report, it's a d8 dhs report. 12-20000000 crimes and typical year, we have a problem of crime in this country, generally about 600,000 of those are going to be interracial, violent crimes that involve either a black pert and a or a white person and the black victim. the percentage around 90%. even the more politically incorrect part of that those numbers are about 80% black onal white. you have to understand, five times as many white people as black people just to begin the analysis, the black crime rate is a bit disproportionate, but the actual figures don't really give support to anyone's theories of paranoia. this is 5% of the crimes, it

doesn't cut in the direction of the mainri stream media reports almost every time if we are going to talk about this fringe topic at all. so i make this point. i'm saying that there is an epidemic of white cops or white people attacking black people, we can all call out place cases where that indeed occur such as the george floyd -- but that simply is not the reality of the country and presenting it as low as it is hurts race relations pretty seriously. >> tucker: it's funny, you rarely talk to people who are completely unafraid to say what they think.ke and you never talk to college professors who have something interesting to say or are freethinkers and doing original research on topics that matter. wilford riley checked all those boxes. it was an amazing conversation. over an hour long. it's on foxnation.com, also a previous episode is on thereto including piers morgan, every

monday, wednesday, friday, 4:00 p.m. on fox nation. the conversation continuing the biggest trend is leaders dividing us in order to distract from their own failures, in some cases their greed. no one has done this more flagrantly than the sitting lieutenant governor of virginia. should be some kind of award for this. accused of sexual assault by two women for his diversion tactic is one for the record books. we'll show you. mark steyn joins us just ahead.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: remember justin fairfax? the attending >> a couple of years ago back when the governor of virginia, trying to explain why he was dressing up during medical school, justin fairfax was accused by two separate women credibly of sexual assault. not of padding, but forced to

sex. now he's running for governor, andd he had to address these allegations that he sexually assaulted two women. go read about them. they weren't flighty, they were absolutely real. but he didn't address them. he didn't need to. instead he compared himself to george floyd and not just george floyd, but to emmett till who was murdered in 1955. for real. chwatch this. >> i was falsely accused in 2019. everybody here on the stage called my immediate resignation including terry mcauliffe 3 minutes after press release came out. he treated me like george freudr treated me like emmett till, no due process, immediately assumed my guilt. >> tucker: like emmett till. he didn't explain why, they were

absolutely real people and they accused him essentially of rape, he was emmett till, a kid from chicago murdered in mississippi? that's a hall of famer right there. mark steyn is a best-selling author. i don't think i've ever seen anybody ever go that far -- not just george floral floyd, but emmett till. >> what i love is the brazenness of it. he's in a pickle here because he's being accused by his fellow democrats. if he was accused just by republicans, the whole thing would go away. because it's believe all women unless they are accusing a democrat. but these other democrats saw an opportunity here so they are accusing. but if everybody is emmett till, nobody is emmett till. if everybody is george floyd, nobody is george floyd. so these comparisons arein

completely insulting and ridiculous. and the fact of the matter is ii don't even get how you played the race card in virginia politics when this guy has spent the last however many years being the lieutenant too, as you said, a guy who dresses up either in black face or egg rank oc he hasn't been treated by george floyd but he's not dead, hasn't been treated by emmett till. he's not dead. he spent four years palling a around with some guy who dresses up in klan robes, and that way back when in the 1920s in the post-great revival promoted by the democratic party but in the 1980s. we have now reached almost all the identity politics, at least displayed by politicians, inherently ridiculous because it's about powerful, corrupt people, as you always say, about

meghan markle, "posing as victims." in this case, ought to be lappee up on the stage but you notice, it was not, tucker. >> tucker: by the way, i do discount some allegations against people. iou know what it is to be falsey accused. but as far as i remember it, it was a black woman, by the way, accusing him of forcing oral sex.n a serious question. >> it is! that's what -- the other allegation is even worse. it's a straight up accusation, credible accusation of rape. we've got some and he who treats women like trash as andrew cuomo does, but he has the advantage because he can play his particular identity politics card, and as you say, it's absurd. because the reason that this happens in mississippi with poor

emmett till who was 14 years old is because it was an accusation. which has long historical roots of the white man's fear that the black man is going to take his woman. in this case its african-american women and the whole thing is total cultural appropriation for his own advantage.ta >> so shameful, i agree appeared hosting the 7:00 p.m. hour this week and doing amazing time. in fact, i'm going to come on with you tomorrow. i hope so. >> you are too kind. thanks a lot, tucker. well finally the d.c. medical examiners released a cause of death of ashley babbitt who wash shot to death on january 6th at the capital along with three other people who died that day. how did they die? now we know. and it's completely different from the lies they've been

telling you for three months. we have that document after the break.

>> we don't forget! if you attack our country, we go after you! we yell at you, we throw away the key. you come after our capitol?

>> tucker: i don't know... >> over at msnbc talking about homicide again. recurring theme. after january 6th, he and everyone else in the media wanted the rest of us to know that those insurrectionist on january 6th had murdered five people. >> president trump is getting the wall, a wall, i should say, bill at taxpayer expense but this one is being built overnight around the u.s. capitol to protect it from trump supporters. the fbi director warning about an extensive amount of online chatter that calls for more violence. it is becoming increasingly clear that it could have even been worse. >> still yet to talk about properly the five killed at the capitol.

>> america is not going to forget that five people were killed occluding a capitol police officer killed on the grounds. >> we've seen five people killed at the capitol. we must hold people accountable to matter what title they hold. >> tucker: the insurrectionist killed five people. except they didn't. that was a total lie. they knew it was a lie. never any evidence it was true. but everyone swallowed it. today, washington, d.c.,'s chief medical examiner dr. francisco diaz released the manner of death of the five people who were murdered at the capitol on january 6th. here's what he found the, only one person actually was a homicide victim. that was ashley babbitt. she was a protester. two other individuals, kevin greeson and benjamin phillips died of heart attacks. a fourth person died of a drug overdose. amphetamines. no cause of death was provided for the deaths of officer brian sick nick

stories have been fact-based from the very beginning and contrast virtually to everyone else and she joins us to assess what we just learned. thank you so much for coming on. what happened around here? >> we learned yet another narrative has completely collapsed. the only person as you say who was killed that day was ashley babbitt. and now as we've seen time and time again whether it's the idea of a deadly armed insurrection, whether it was sedition, all of these things that we were told early on, every single one of those story lines has fallen apart. but here's the question, tucker. who is to start retracting -- i mean, we probably have hundreds of thousands of citations that five people were killed. it was in that house democrat impeachment trial memo, who's going to retract that? it's already ingrained. tens of millions americans already believe this. it doesn't matter, the facts don't matter but we are trying

our best to tell people exactly what the truth is. >> tucker: they lied about every one of these or recklessly speculated without knowledge, which you aren't supposed to do that in journalism. the poor woman who died of a drug o'dea, don't know the details of that. when we told she was trampled to death by insurrectionist? >> we were. we were told she suffocated because of this mob. we were told that brian sick nick was murdered with a fire extinguisher. finally "the new york times" had to retract that story but i had a piece over this week this past weekend when they were talking about the killing of officer evans who was run over, as you know, on friday, they regurgitated the story about officer still citing the fact that officer sicknick was killed by an fire extinguisher. >> thank you for your fact-based

coverage of this. i wish you work for "the new york times." great to see you. we will be back tomorrow and every night at 8:00 p.m., the enemy that's a sworn enemy of lying, and groupthink. sean hannity takes it away. >> sean: thank you and welcome and tonight we begin with a fox news alert. breaking news on our southern border tonight as texas governor greg abbott bringing to life sick disturbing frightening credible allegations of real abuse and incredibly abusive conditions inside of joe biden's migrant cages for kids. tonight the governor of texas rightly demanding action. take a look. >> earlier today, the texas health and human services commission and the texas department of family and protective services separately received tips that allege child abuse