♪ ♪ >> sean: unfortunately, that is all the time we have left. i do have good news. let not your hearts be troubled. why? because the news continues. laura ingraham, big show to 19ni i was hoping you and i wer going to match this time and dress but that would only be if you had to wrestle up -- >> my show is over. laura: the hannity striptease. laura: maybe one day you should wear a ruffle and i will take the tie off and we can pick that up. >> don't like what they are teaching these kids in the prep school. laura: that is out.

>> you have 3 beautiful children, they are some kids. can you imagine your kids being taught this crap? >> they would be pulled out of the school and the school would be exposed to that for those parents have to do. >> got to fight like hell, they get interviewed before they get into priest school, they can't get into kindergarten. but if you don't get an you are stuck in the crappy new york city public school system. laura: it is called leave new york. i will talk to you tomorrow. this is the ingraham angle. mike pompeo will join us in moments to respond to the revelations of the fauci and forces inside the state department quashed a lab leak investigation plus florida

governor rhonda santos response to fauci lashing out at him in one of those uncovered emails. one father's tick-tock video denouncing critical race. and blm, this thing went viral. corey tells us why he made those videos but first, covid collusion is the focus of tonight's angle. you know the old saying when you find yourself in a whole got to stop digging, today doctor anthony fauci refused to put down his shovel. he made a few appearances on friendly morning shows including m s nbc where he was asked why it was so hard to determine the origins of the virus? >> why is it so hard to find the source of this outbreak? is because china is so opaque or the who is not sharing information? wise it's a difficult? >> one of the things is we need better access to all the information. it is obviously in china's interest to find out exactly

what it is and the is of the natural theory would be to find that link. laura: does he really think americans are stupid? his newfound believe that we have to keep looking for it, meaning the virus's origin is just hilarious? he knows and we know that back in january of 2020 china used the who as a block and tackle to force any real inquiry from going forward. instead of questioning why deadly virus broke out in the city that has china's only level 4 virology lab the who unquestioningly parroted the ccp's talking point and denied the rest of the world precious time to prepare. they even praised china's commitment and transparency, the ccc p disposed of evidence. to be sure anthony fauci wasn't demanding answers from the ccp either, he was busy covering for

them and is doing the same now. >> obviously you want openness and cooperation. one of the ways you can get it is don't be accusatory. the accusatory part of it will only get them to pull back even more. laura: power government approaches china is not his business. it is up to the white house and the state department yet fauci repeatedly makes political calculations. >> we got to do in the combination of diplomacy, scientific, forensic investigation and do it in a way that people of good faith, not want to blame but people in good faith really trying to find out what the origin is.

laura: good faith? i wouldn't even -- i wouldn't let them pass my lips if i were he. the fact is the only reason he's talking about the origins issue now is because of the release of those emails. those emails are to fauci what the blue dress was to bill clinton, just when we thought we had learned the worst of the other stunning revelations came to light such as the fact that fauci's relationship with china, america's main geopolitical adversary was exceedingly close. notice how he always takes their side. >> i think it is quite far-fetched the chinese deliberately engineered something so that they can kill themselves as well as other people. i think that is a bit far out. >> don't you love his intimidation when it is all about china, that will never happen. he even excuses their destruction of evidence. >> the scientists in china many of them are really very good scientists. one of the things they did wrong is cleaned out the market as

soon as there was this outbreak for fear that it would spread even more, they may have wiped out evidence of the jumping of species. >> how does he know they did that cleanup out of fear that it would spread and not out of fear that the ccp would kill them if they didn't do that. these high-ranking government officials are not used to being accountable to real people. talking to elites with in their own circles is what they prefer to do or in friendly settings, they are really press to answer uncomfortable questions like how and where the virus started and when they do get asked these questions they get very defensive. >> i agree we need to get to the

bottom of this but you and i just spent a bunch of minutes here talking about some issue we need to get an answer to it meanwhile people are still dying from covid 19. focus on how we are going to save lives will we are talking about how this started. laura: people want to get the vaccine can get the vaccine but for some reason you don't even want to entertain basic relevant questions like why was the nih ever giving millions of dollars in grant money to a group like the eco-health alliance. eco-health alliance has been working with a virologist will: institute for more than 15 years. since 2014, an nih grant is funded them, involving collecting feces and other samples from bats and blood samples from people at risk of infection from that origin viruses. the wic is a sub recipient on the grant. again us taxpayer dollars going to the wuhan lab, one of the few in the world where this gang of

function research was taking place while it looks like there was a moratorium still in place. the fact that us tax dollars were floating around there is a scandal in and of itself especially now that we know fauci scrambled in the early days of the pandemic to downplay nih's in china's capability. he is still doing this and so are his biggest fans. >> the real issue is not how did this happen but how do we protect ourselves from the next pandemic and how do we have an early warning system for whether it is naturally occurring for a laboratory leak? >> we should be careful with our words. don't blame the chinese as a whole, don't use blanket terminology. laura: somewhere along the way all these people became so obsessed with driving trump from

office, so obsessed with maintaining their own fiefdom that they became shilled to one of the most brutal regimes in the world. every now and then, one of their colleagues will step out of line like former cdc director robert redfield. >> i spent my life in virology. i do not believe this somehow came from a bat to a human. normally when that happens it takes a while to figure out how to become more and more efficient in human to human transmission. i don't think this makes biological sense. laura: the medical cartels here moved into crush redfield. he told vanity fair that after making those comments he received death threats from fellow scientists, so i was threatened and ostracized because i proposed another hypothesis. i expected it from politicians, i didn't expect it from scientists. we did. and a year ago we warned you

what would happen if science was politicized and if we gave unelected bureaucrats way too much power. the elected medical bureaucrats keep moving the goal posts for when they think the economy can reopen. >> is got to be a check on their power and if there is not this is a very bad precedent going forward. none of these people including doctor fauci can be taken all that seriously anymore given what we have seen because science just like journalism and entertainment has become a seemingly politicized. a lot of hairstyles. all this time later the media are scrambling to try to restore their credibility medley. suddenly reporting on what they failed to report on when donald trump was still in office. their justification for their dereliction of duty is pathetic.

vanity fair was worried only crackpots or political hacks wanting to hurt china relieved the elaborate leak. cited trump's toxic racism sperry anti-asian violence and their reason to delay their own reporting on this. that is so disingenuous. as vanity fair itself noted a liberal and highly respected scientist named richard e wright said it took him a nanosecond to consider a link to wuhan. i guess that was another conspiracy crackpot guy? with donald trump basically out of office vanity fair felt liberated to provide key details that raised serious questions about fauci, francis collins and the whole nih gang. in the first year of the trump administration a gain of function moratorium was lifted and replaced with a review system. the framework was largely met with shrugs and i rolls that

longtime agency officials, if you ban gain of function research you ban all of virology the jeffersons the moratorium everyone has gone wink wink and done gain of function anyway. what? this is huge. i will say it again and again, the fact that so many have been unwilling to tell the whole truth on this matter, the fact that so many have been willing to protect china's role and the fact that -- in the united states, screens of the need for real accounting here. democrats made up the entire russian collusion charge to hurt trump but the fact we have laid out for more than a year they weren't made up so if covid collusion isn't real, tony and francis better start talking and that is the angle. joining me as mike pompeo, former secretary of state and

distinguished fellow at the husband institute. thank you for joining us. what we have learned over the past few days about fauci and the and i age and the state department is truly disturbing, your reaction. >> it should come as no surprise to anyone that there are folks who didn't like donald trump, didn't like me, didn't like what we are doing and we are going to work to support our efforts, no great surprise, to fauci this morning talk about how the chinese have an interest in us discovering what happened is crazy talk. they were deep interest in covering up and have done so pretty effectively. in fact it was the state department that ultimately -- ultimately put out documents january 15th that demonstrate some of the central fact we now know that lead to overwhelming amount of evidence to demonstrate is probably did come from this virology lab, good work by the state department,

overcame lots of internal bureaucracy to get there, lots of internal debate in nih. the described how mild you, state department principal china strategist began mirroring the wuhan institute's website and compiling a dossier of questions about research, the article then claims that in april he gave this dossier to you and you demanded access to the lab but in the office of the director until later that month released a statement saying the entire community concurs with the wide scientific consensus the covid 19 was not man-made or genetically modified. why was the dna downplaying what you were trying to uncover at the time? >> i was handed an extensive piece from a professor at the naval academy that was working for me at the state department,

lots of things others couldn't get their hands on and it was pretty clear when we received that if i remember right in early may, a few days after that was on tv talking about what i could get declassified at that point, worked diligently to declassify more, director radcliffe was a partner in trying to do that. there were folks all over the community who didn't want to talk about this, wanted to stay focused on other things and not let them know they were in the process, several million loss of life. i will leave it to others to speculate but when you heard doctor fauci this morning, the exact same excuses, the same theories the chinese communist party was presenting for over a year. we can draw our own conclusions, we had a group inside the state department and a handful of others working diligently to get this information out to the american people so the world can see what the chinese communist party has done to all of us.

laura: doctor fauci is essentially saying what the ccp is saying about china. it is highly unlikely that things happened in a lab but you really can't tell one from the other the way they discuss the situation at the start of the pandemic. >> implies good faith by the chinese communist party. on the 30 second anniversary of tiananmen square where we saw the brutality of this regime which doesn't care about human life. don't think they care people in wuhan were dying weather was chinese people, americans, it is naïve beyond all possible imagination. the chinese government doesn't care for a moment, they have no desire for the world to know what happened, they could clear this up in a minute if they wanted to be. they've chosen not to. that's another link in the chain that demonstrates when we get to the end of this we will have

demonstrated that the chinese knew what had happened and there virology lab was at the center of it. >> one at the center went on face the nation in february to lay out the lab leak evidence and you probably don't remember it because it never aired but here it is now. >> the types of research that were underway by the civilian staff of the wuhan institute of virology and also military researchers, studies into exactly the kinds of viruses that are 96% similar to the virus now making us all sick. they were doing gain of function research using humanized mice. >> could this information from an extremely smart individual indicate we can't rule out that this just wasn't some lab leak or even a dual use situation? >> we don't know. i saw the statements matt made.

we had seen the same data. your viewers should know people talk about this is if we don't know very much. we know an awful lot about what was going on with gain of function research, the fact this lab was level for with security leaks and there were doctors became ill and were hospitalized in fall 2019. we have an awful lot of evidence pointing to what happened. what was the chinese, party's attention, there was military activity taking place in the laboratory, we don't know exactly what they were doing but we know they don't want you to know what that suggests to me we should give them no benefit of the doubt and wait for them to come clean on what happened inside the country. >> simply yes or no. should any us tax dollars be going to any group that is in partnership with the wuhan virology institute given what we know about china, their goals and lack of transparency, should any of this be happening?

>> absolutely not. it is reckless. laura: thank you. and by the way, you have an op-ed on tiananmen square and the protests tomorrow in the hill, everyone has to read this, all these protests have been banned by china and hong kong as well and it is really important piece, thank you for writing it. one of the targets inside fauci absent a female was florida governor rhonda santos, the governors here in moments to respond, some redactions of the emails point to ongoing investigations. filter been has those disturbing answers.

♪ ♪ >> laura: fauci not only exposed all of the l >> not only expose liesig and coverups but also just one a small and vindictive democrat he really is, felt it was treating the ccp -- he was working behind-the-scenes to undermine one of the red state governors, in a march 2020 email fauci regarding bars and beaches i've been screaming to tell the

younger generation to start taking it seriously was a surprise governor desantis is not completely closed bars even if they serve food, take out only. i will bring this up at the task force meeting tomorrow. here is florida governor rhonda santos. did this surprise you to see doctor fauci so desirous of a policy role for which he is not an expert. >> it didn't surprise me. he is somebody that if you follow what he said he said you did a good job. he said new york has the best response to covid. in terms of numbers i don't see how you can say that with all the destruction that is happening so in florida we chose freedom over fauci. we are much better off for doing that. is lockdown policies were not justified by the scientific data, he fearmonger about schools, he did not support florida, he was wrong about

masks and asymptomatic spread. it was pretty clear to me after a short time this was all about himself and his own image and you look at him lounging by the pool with the sunglasses on, in the midst of the pandemic, almost a let them eat cake moment for those chasing under his lockdown and seem to be having the time of his life. laura: do you have any interaction with him or his office? >> in the early part we did. january or february almost every governor, we viewed the authority being held up, we listened to him, worked with him as we got into march, we were working with the task force but pretty clear the data service coming in april and in particular it parted from what the task force was recommending and made sure we were open and

all those other things. we had less interaction but i know he was involved in a lot of governors every step of the way, some of the states that had nursing home policy, he was involved in things like that, a big believer in hospital models funded by bill gates, they were grievously wrong but i know he was a believer in that and in the imperial college model that neil ferguson had done which was disastrously wrong, cause a lot of panic in the united kingdom and the united states. >> do you believe it was in error to have given him this much power in the way of media presence and briefings every day? >> i did share the concern. there's a lot of concern at the white house as well. the problem, to elevate anybody

like that is problematic but when you have somebody going out and literally doing every interview under the sun he ended up contradicting himself, indulging hypotheticals, doing political commentary sometimes because the media wanted to use fauci to attack people like me and other republicans. people will look back on this period and say someone in fauci's role, that's what you don't do time and again, he was way overexpose and what you want to do in these health situations, have one or 2 clear messages and keep repeating that but don't got to indulge every left-wing reporter in the united states every day. >> fauci is a liberal, he obviously didn't like trump, was buddies with cuomo and yukking it up with them on tv.

always could have should have would have, it is a crisis and you can't go back and it was a mistake to put them in that role and a mistake to have them out there every day, that was a mistake and thank you. >> given his role in this lab league. >> you think this is the beginning of the inquiry here or are they going -- democrats just going to ignore it? >> i think they're going to ignore it. republicans take back the congress, we will have legitimate investigation, we need to investigate the origins of covid evidence january 6th which is purely partisan. very important but it will not happen with biden and the democrats in charge. >> thank you. the fauci emails anomaly troubling for what they reveal but also what they conceal. the 3200 page document is riddled with redactions each citing legal exemptions but what do they mean and what might they

be hiding. this is the president of unleashed prosperity, i want to start with an email between fauci and peter -- you is a big advocate of gain of function of research. a huge chunk of it is free and acted citing exemption be 7 a. what does that refer to? >> refers to a criminal investigation. this is a very unusual exemption from an agency like the nih, usually this exemption shows up when the fbi or atf or some other enforcement agency use it for information that could compromise the current ongoing investigation so for this to show up in an nih document production is extremely unusual. >> a criminal investigation into the ongoing gain of function research during the moratorium or an individual or we simply don't know? >> we really don't know but it

is interesting because this is not fauci writing. presumably it is information that he had that is now relevant to some ongoing criminal investigation. i don't know who is under investigation but this is unusual and does indicate the existence of some investigation. laura: a concern email between fauci and zuckerberg, much of it is redacted citing be 4 exemptions, what does that refer to and why might they invoke it, zuckerberg says would like you to do a colloquy, live facebook interview and talk about how they are going to have a coronavirus database. because at the end, finally and then the whole paragraph is x out. and fauci's response, very exciting and he's most excited about this. we don't know what he's most excited about. that exemption refers to trade secrets, commercially protected intellectual property, that kind of thing.

it is very hard to figure out what trade secrets could possibly been implicated in an offer like this. my conjecture is it was something along the lines of we will give you the ability to decide what subject to fact check or suppression on our platform or something like that they would have felt embarrassing to disclose. i don't think that is a trade secret so it would not be a legitimate reduction but hard to see what they could have hiding behind that would qualify as a trade secret. i hope it will be an appeal of this but i don't know what they are thinking that regard. >> maybe something about we will have technology in place that will allow you to find out who has been exposed or not. none of this should be redacted.

550,000 people plus dead in the united states, we are still digging on this, thank you so much, some to call it the biden administration is allowing at the border one thing, criminal, dan patrick explains why plus is the biden administration looking to squeeze the suburbs out of existence. it seems far-fetched maybe but it is happening already. we will explain next.

♪ ♪ >> laura: the border situation >> the border situation is so catastrophic that even nbc news is forced to admit that biden bears some of the blame reporting the border is not closed. the determination of who stays and who goes has become a lottery with winners and losers. the asylum claim and decided point. who is trying to win that lottery? the other week 10 convicted sex offenders including child rapists were arrested trying to cross into the del rio sector. we were there a few years ago. there's been more than a 3000% increase of sex offenders arrested in that sector. those are just the ones caught of course. joining me texas lieutenant governor dan patrick. i have said this and i am going

to say it again. i believe there are not only criminal issues with how this is being handled but at some point when does this become an impeachable offense to just allow united states sovereignty to be completely overrun willfully overrun? >> can you imagine we would be in a point in time in our history where the president of the united states is allowing thugs, criminals, felons, rapists, child molesters, murderers to cross our border without much opposition? in one week in may, just one week we apprehended about 28,000 people just in texas. remember we are two thirds of the border but that is just in texas and of those people from all over the world, almost 150 came from romania. how did they get here? and this nonsense of we are just

letting unaccompanied children in, it is setting a record more than we've ever had in one week, close to 20,000 in one week unaccompanied minors but this idea that adult males 21 and over are coming across, they are being turned back, it is a lie. it is not just invasion of people that are going to impact our emergency rooms and hospitals and schools and economy across the board, not just the fact that this is humane to many women and young girls to come here from the sex trafficking the men who are enslaved and have to send wages back to the cartel, the real threat to america is the threat of thugs joining gangs. ms 13 -- they are loading up their gangs. >> i know it is a horrible humanitarian issue and i understand that and it is

terrible but biden's job is to safeguard our country, our people that are suffering right now in inner cities, suffering with depression after this horrible year, gas is extensive, food is expensive so our people are suffering and now we have tens of thousands of people, it will be 2 million by the end of the year, where are these -- hold on, hold onto where are these people being sent? a lot of them staying in texas but not all of them. a lot of them are being distributed across the country. do you know where they are going? >> anywhere they want to go is where they are going. turn and release. we are lucky we catch some of these criminal records which we caught a murderer convicted of murder in the united states in 2002 but many of these people who we apprehended and you are right, i was giving the broad-spectrum but these criminals will be committing crimes in our streets and the size of the gangs of ms 13 the take on police in every one of the 50 states.

>> most are not criminals but they are obviously going to take resources we need to go to the american people. the american people are getting ripped off. this is so upsetting to people who just want fairness and having a good immigration system is fair. this is criminal what is going on. >> you -- borderline treasonous turning over a country to people flooding across the border and i hear they may be a pending title 42 soon but they may bring it up. laura: thank you. policies actually work. biden is not content with destroying the border, he's coming for the suburbs. his big infrastructure plan includes incentives for local governments to get rid of exclusionary zoning laws that are minorities.

the goal is to coax localities into allowing high-rise apartment buildings in neighborhoods zoned for single-family houses. congresswoman and former mayor beth van dyne. how will a plan like this destroy suburbs in this country? >> the biden administration wanting to take control away from local elected officials and put it into dc bureaucrats, the ability for them to permit for single-family homes which a lot of people want to live in, to go to a neighborhood where their kids can play in their own yard be able to go to the schools they want to go to, and ownership for their future and you are seeing the biden administration saying we are going to take that away from local municipalities and force

on you zoning ordinances to put multi-dubbadash laura: let everyone understand your property value will go down, your crime rate will go up. is that what you want? is that what america wants? >> this is all about control, taking away people's choices, but also taking away people's opportunity to build generational wealth. we have come from decades and decades of people being able to buy homes, that was the american dream, they don't want that. laura: everyone who is miserable in the inner-city living under liberal will they want all the suburbs to be as miserable as people are in baltimore and chicago. i will look at the housing situation in greenville, delaware, there are currently 0 low income housing communities and 0 rent subsidized apartment. he is going to blow up, getting

rid of those zoning laws. >> it is for thee, not me. i don't think he will do it in his neighborhood at all but i got elected running against an incumbent. and i got elected. what i heard overwhelmingly. they don't want these monstrous apartment complexes, they want to have neighborhoods. we were selling them like hotcakes, not enough homes to buy. you see people moving to places like texas and california away from those. and dad and his daughter went viral for videos rejecting critical race. blm. the father joins us to tell us why he did it and thinks they are making such an impact, stay there.

what makes new salonpas arthritis gel so good for arthritis pain? salonpas contains the most prescribed topical pain relief ingredient. it's clinically proven, reduces inflammation and comes in original prescription strength. salonpas. it's good medicine.

♪ ♪ how we treat people is based on who they change how we treat people based on they are. >> if they are nice. >> this is how children should think right here.

critical race theory wants to end that. not with my children. not going to happen. we need to stop crt point blank. they love everybody. laura: that message is something every parent -- many parents pick speaking out against critical race theory and the damage it is meaning to our kids in school. why is it so important to talk about this issue. it goes toward youth, toward young people, i want my daughter to treat people with respect whether they are black, white, yellow, brown, i want people to know that people should be judged by their character and not their color. laura: there was a moment on television when eugene robinson of the washington post made a

point about critical race theory. watch. flutter about critical race.. history has a way of winning. of making its effects known no matter who tries to stop this phenomenon. you are going to keep telling the truth. laura: this rejection of critical race theory is a right-wing only issue in your view? >> no, absolutely not. anybody who doesn't have in their mind they want people to be judged by your race or your color or your creed, your nationality, that goes to all spectrums, liberal, democrats, right, left, doesn't matter. laura: some schools in the

washington dc area are having surveys, some consulting group gets paid a lot of money to tell everybody how racist they are even if they don't think they are of course they are. the white kids have to separate into one group and the black kids, people of color separate to another and they have to do different workshops, the white kids do the workshop where they apologize and examine their race. what about that approach to teaching and education? >> why are we going backwards in america? are we trying to go back to jim crow? we are going back to segregation. we need to move forward, teach people there is no difference between you if you are white or black. why is that so hard? i don't understand. it is so racist. it is so racist. laura: the point they are making

is america is systemically racist to her core and because america is systemically racist everything has to be taught through that lens to prevent further corrosion of our country. >> frederick douglass said that the constitution is a glorious liberty document and i believe the same thing. frederick douglass and martin luther king believed we were systemically racist there was no way we could change, i don't think -- they knew we had a constitution, right? it is for liberty of all men. all races and all creeds. laura: this interview will be seen by a lot of people, your viral video was awesome. thank you for joining us. up next, a wonderful last bite.

it would be cool to ride a horse on the moon.

>> still happening here are leaders -- >> the readers are asking us a

lot of things. >> i. maybe it might be true that we are waiting for bad news day for that to come out. if you see a tail wagging coming out of the briefing you will know something bad is about to happen. i don't have an update on the cat. there's a lot of interest. >> go with the cat every time. profile media the gutfeld takes it from here. >> it is friday june 4th. fires erupting, attacks on law enforcement over a fugitive who was armed and dangerous. we will bring you breaking details. jillian: a to report in the search for answers about covid answers. state officials making out they were told not to dig any deeper. we will tell you why. >> there is a line drive right up the middle. >> that