can do to stop it and what the policy ought to be, this is an honest, completely honest nonideological science-based conversation on the topic. best i've ever had. will be back tomorrow night. the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. have the best night. here's a surprise for you. sean hannity is taking over at 9:00 p.m. for the full hour, ladies and gentlemen! >> sean: amazing. tucker, thank you, and welcome to the breaking news addition of "hannity" more shocking violent crime caught on tape and this is really sad. this includes a couple dragged from their car, boyfriend and girlfriend shot execution-style. he's dead and the girlfriend is now clinging to her life after this minor fender bender in chicago. typical weekend in the windy city over 50 people shot and we have full coverage tonight.

but we tonight with the democrats, their far left socialist radical agenda and its failing and pretty much everywhere that it's tried. it's all self-destructive and democrats now in complete damage control trying to rewrite history trying to pretend as if they never held these radical positions they had been pushing but they're running away from their own radical stance in the democratic party is fracturing right before your eyes. now, just looking at the issue of voter i.d. where we now see the most shameless, the most bizarre, the most brazen flippant end up flopping and turning around with the likes of stacey abrams, joe biden, raphael warnock, and others now trying to claim that they were never against a voter idea never once. they are claiming that they never made baseless claims of being part of "jim crow 2.0" voting reform laws in the case of abrams. she clearly has pretty short

memory. or just straight up lying. joe biden, stacey abrams, they've cost georgia and georgia businesses an estimated $100 million just by losing the all-star game alone. luckily for joe, stacy, raphael, we have tape of them and by the way, we are happy to refresh the memories. take a look. >> redux of a failed system that's designed to both scare people out of voting and make it harder for those who are willing to push through and make it harder for them to vote. >> did give me a list of the provisions that you objected. >> it shortened the federal runoff. mack it restricts the time of voter to regroup and reform. some sort of identification for them to surrender to participate in absentee ballot process.

that's one of the fallacies in republican talking points is deeply disturbing no one's objected to having to prove who you are to vote and it's been part of the nation's history since the inception of owning. >> sean: abrams now saying she's even backing democrat senator joe manchin and the voting compromise that it's actually reportedly would be similar to george's voting log reform that abrams and civic of joe biden were referring to as jim crow 2.0. while corporations such as mlb cost the state of georgia hundreds of millions of dollars and a lot of lies told about the state and so it could be democrats starting to see the writing is on the wall. realizing their positions on voter i.d., so many other issues are as unpopular as ever. look at this monmouth university poll in the chose overwhelmingly the american people support voter picture i.d. 91% of republicans, 87% of

independents, 62% of democrats, and 84% of nonwhite americans, they support integrity and competence in elections and that means photo voter i.d. what democrats call jim crow 2.0 is actually popular with americans all across the country and it's the first list thing from voter suppression and it's one of the few issues americans are actually united on. of course, democrats doubled down on lie after lie on after lie after joe, stacy, raffaella, they are spewing the lies and when did they apologize for dividing the country? creating racial division like far left extremist to georgia senator rafael warnock. he's flat out lying tried to claim that he never opposed voter i.d. despite numerous examples uncovered by foxnews.com going back years. what about president sippy cup? why didn't he ever lift a finger and he's represented the state

of delaware for five years and guess what, he never lifted a finger to create more accessibility for voters in his state and they don't have any early voting like the state of georgia does, 17 days in-person early voting. no drop boxes in delaware. they don't have any excuse absentee ballots like they do in torture, no, never lifted a finger. also, the mob in the media, asking the tough questions about why he didn't lift a finger to make voting left restrictive in this home state or as he calls out i'm from a slave states. the media, meltdown after meltdown when donald trump called them out for the fake news now just watch biden's behavior and you ask yourself what with the mob's reaction be if this was donald trump? take a look. >> how would your role as vice president and your son's job, how is that constituted?

>> there's no constituted conflict of interest. i'm not going to respond to this. a focus on this man and what he's doing. no president has ever done, no president. >> it's a long way until november we've got more questions. >> we've got more questions. if you have a problem, figure out if it's for me are trump and you ain't black. >> when i announced, it's not possible, give me a break. >> your long dog faced -- >> your subject to some degree of cognitive decline. >> sean: he also partnered with a klansman to stop immigration of schools and didn't want schools to become racial jungles his words. rather than seriously covering sippy cup and the failing agenda and the weakness of fraud, wannabe journalist, look at

"the new york times" and the full-time donald trump stalker and even she is supposed be covering biden. appears to be obsessed with all things donald trump and mostly ignoring the ever forgetful joe. a review, foxnews.com, it found that "the new york times" published more than 40 stories featuring maddie in some capacity in the paper claimed she would be covering the biden administration only five have been about biden with a majority focused on donald trump. remember, it was stalker maggie in "the new york times" partisan socialist packs, one neck the pulitzer prize in 2018 for the russia collusion coverage which of course turned out to be completely and totally false, based on bad sources, bad information, bad journalism, bas

left wing partisan radical agenda. i will ask again, maggie, when will you admit your mistakes and correct the record, return the fake pulitzer and admit who you are? you become a full-time donald trump stalker and you're not covering joe biden the way you covered donald trump. you are not capable of it. if she stocks trump and gives biden a pass. it just like "the new york times" colleagues, they just all can't seem to quite donald trump. the mob, the media, they miss trump more than anybody else in the country. may be other stalkers at "the new york times," her colleagues, maybe they want to get trump bobbleheads for them so they can put pins in it at night. here's a headline. let's see, trump stalkers at "the new york times" need to return their fake pulitzer. "the new york times" completely botched their russian coverage and they were wrong again and again and again. they spread lie after lie, conspiracy theory after

conspiracy theory to you, the american people and it went on for three long years. for example, remember, maggie hagerman, stocking trump. trump jr. was told in an email of russian effort to aid campaign, then ended up being a total misleading story. it failed to explain that the lawyer in the impetus trump tower meeting was tied to glenn simpson the guy that hired christopher steele to put together the fake hillary clinton bought and paid for dirty russian disinformation dossier and used uncorroborated in pfizer applications to spy on candidate trump and later president trump. your fellow "new york times" trump stalkers, maggie, you blew the biggest story in your career. you never told your readers the truth. you never told the dossier was garbage, full of lies,

propaganda, russian misinformation. you never told them that they were warning repeatedly about issues about christopher steele. if this is an journalism. you become basically the press office for all things new green deal socialism. if the pulitzer committee if yod any integrity, "the new york times" had any integrity, you had any integrity, you'd return the phone he pulitzer. it maggie and the leftist hat colleagues at "the new york times" lied to, phony reward in the paper tonight is already doing damage control tweeting out maggie haberman is one of the finest journalists of her generation. no she's not. and let me just say the tweet will not age well. varied speaking of sources, well, what's "the new york times" telling the readers about joe biden, the week, the frail, cognitive mess that's joe biden. have they done a deep dive in

the schedule and one item a day with the staff is really thinking about him. why aren't they investing those important stories because we know so called reporters at "the new york times" and elsewhere are nothing but an extension of the democratic new green deal socialist party. they amplify the same lies, the same agenda, they smear republicans, they obsess over trump, they hide truth, they protect democrats. here are the reaction outnumbered cohost, kayleigh mcenany and fox news contributor mike huckabee. there's a lot of ways to lie, they lie by just outright lying and what they reported about "the new york times" we will start with you, governor huckabee, was false. they got a pulitzer prize for stories that were phony. now, if they had any integrity i would imagine that they would give the pulitzer back. do you see that? >> no, i'm pretty sure we will

not see them give the pulitzer back. it's become a prize for fiction for the most part and your monologue was spot on about the malpractice of journalism and how it has become so absolutely disgusting. they are still obsessed with donald trump and he's living rent-free in all of their heads, not only is he living rent-free i think he's charging them. it's just an amazing experience to watch that they can't seem to let go. part of it is, sean, they can't really report about joe biden administration because if they dated honestly, they'd be reporting pretty much a scandal every day. not the fact that you got kamala harris who is now almost 90 days still having not showing up at the border, but you've got the hunter biden controversy, the fact that joe outright lied about having never had conversations with his son about businessmen we know they did at the cafe right there in d.c. so, yeah, they don't want to

cover them. >> sean: i am close to pull the trigger on "the new york times," i might do it, got other things in my life to worry about. then there lying, but it is damaging. but what's fascinating is project veritas, they've got a brig new york supreme court decision. i've interviewed james o'keefe and he said under no circumstances is he ever going to settle. i don't care how much insurance they have come a discovery, that means we make it to see the emails, their text messages, we may get to see the internal workings of "the new york times" and i would imagine that might be quite interesting. same with sarah palin in her case. >> that would be huge, sean. justice scalia who pointed out its wholehearted win a defamation case because you have to prove actual malice.

i'm sure if you got access to the personal text messages to the reporter you might find the actual malice against president trump, james o'keefe, or other. here's the sad truth about the garbage that's being spewed on the front pages, the beat of the reporters is not the white house, its hatred of donald trump and the currency is leaks. they depend on leaks and people have the worst reputation and conservative circles in washington and the tv realm are people who do not leak to these papers. there's a reason for that, they depend on it, thrive on it, and make no mistake donald trump is their motive. >> sean: why they not want to cover hillary paying for a dirty russian dossier? why would they not want to cover -- it says at the top of the fisa application verified in four signed by the unverified

and we now know that the information in the dossier was false. why wouldn't they cover that aspect and why wouldn't they be interested in the fact that joe biden appears to be cognitively a mess, to put it nicely. >> the simple answer to that, sean, analysts today no longer consider themselves the referees of the game calling balls and strikes and trying to really make sure the game is played fairly. they put on a team jersey and their own team, biden, their own team left. they go to the field not to report the news, but create the news. and to shield the average american from the news. the stuff that's going on right now about stacey abrams and finding out she will support joe manchin's bill and voter i.d., you played a number of things where they revealed.

she's got more flip-flops than a jimmy buffett concert, for heaven sakes. there is no credibility and that's why people have so little respect or even confidence whatsoever in the media anymore. >> sean: mike huckabee and kayleigh mcenany, it seems like there are new green deal socialist tax, the press office of the democratic party in full-time donald trump stockers. we move on tonight, the failures of the democratic agenda are leading to more and more violence on streets all all across the country. democrats tried to run from the truth and the reality, run from the destruction at the far left extreme agenda is causing the country, real pain inflicted on these residents, it is now undeniable yet again this weekend a wave of shootings hit the city of chicago. over four doesn't shootings this weekend in chicago alone, 50

plus people shot including the k and twisted attacks. a married couple, literally following an apparent fender bender after the cities puerto rican day parade on sunday, dragged from their car and shot execution-style pretty much in cold blood. the man, 24-year-old, he is dead. his 25-year-old girlfriend, she is fighting for her life tonight and police say no one is in custody. interesting, i doubt you've heard the name before right now. how is it 50 people how shot and most americans don't know the name of one of them. if we've been running names and scrolling names on the show since when biden was vice president. this was obama's home city. mayor lori lightweight, it's devolved into a total war zone and you can't have a pursuit of happiness in any way without law

and order in simple safety and security. if may be focused a little less on attacking republicans and looking at the race of reporters that cover you. feel like the vice of local politics and may be focus on what's going on in your backyard and in your city that you claim to care about. you along with conrad bill de blasio, so many others, failed democratic mayors and governors. not protecting the citizens are supposed to protect. if you're not being the public servants you swear to be. if you can't protect basic safety and security, law and order, you can't support the police and you supports a bail, then it's time for you to resign and let somebody in that will protect the people of your city and state. it's not your chicago. new york city prosecutors, get this, no dropping charges against hundreds of rioters and looters that were caught last summer during the unrest better known as rioting. a exposing yet again that this

is a failed socialist city and state that will stock at donald trump and did he pay every penny of every tax going back to the last 39 years of his life? do nothing to save the lives of innocent people. we've got people on videotape committing acts of arson and looting. we have their identities, their videos, their pictures, all the evidence we need. we are not doing a thing. i we going to create a city with normal common sense law-abiding americans where they can pursue their lives? what's going on in these democratic run is an abomination and it's unacceptable. it's unconscionable, it's unacceptable, and not at all surprising. it is a natural consequence of what democratic rule does to everything around them. it works like clockwork, far left extremists take no responsibility, defund, dismantle, no bail laws and looks what's happening. take a look.

>> many of the city we talked about moving the money, they slowed about how they were thinking of moving the money. if the rising crime is not the fault of the movement, it's actually the fault of the police and this has been the point all along. why should we keep finding systems and institutions that keep rendering themselves in effective? we should be talking about gun control, livable wages, fair housing, education, that's where we should be moving the money to to insured to truly safe streets. sp1 joining with reaction, radio talk host show, larry elder and leo 2.0 terrell terrel. i'm looking at your reaction, we do this every week. every monday we come on the air and give you the names of 50 people shot in chicago and new york, nobody knows their names, larry, nobody seems to care about the names and they can politicize it. >> you know, sean and leo, 2007

when obama was interviewed by 6e was interviewed as well. the correspondent said are you worried about your husband safety? michelle said no because as a black man, barack would be shot in a gas station at chicago. if she wasn't talking about q annan, white nationalists, the crime in chicago. one of those candid moments in kamala harris and guatemala talked about the root causes and why do we not talk about the root causes here and they include as you pointed out they defund the police movement, black lives matter, the lie that police are engaging in systemic racism. they are pulling back. of surprise, surprise, crime has gone up. it not of which the major cause, fatherlessness and the black-and-white community and were not having a conversation about that at all. >> sean: leo, they don't give in adam schiff, they don't give

an adam schiff for seriously about the lies and seriously, we would know the names of the people that got shot if they cared about lives mattering. these lives we are scrolling would matter. we've got a record number of police officers killed in the line of duty this year. this is all on top of last year's record. so, the problem gets worse, but we will hear about the one, the two cases they can use politically to bludgeon republicans. why? >> why? because they exploit and use black people. that's all they use them for and they don't use them to progress them, they don't use them to improve schools, lori lightfoot is a political gator. she cut a deal, she's not going after the game, she's going after white reporters and she'll go after gun control and law-abiding citizens and she ignored the help of donald trump but she's begging from help for joe biden because she wants to

make it a gun issue and a pandemic issue. but she allows the game members, the career criminals to flourish in chicago. she's a gangster. she's cut a deal and she is going to allow them to flourish and she's going to do it at the expense of the minorities. >> sean: all these names we are scrolling and we agreed their lives matter. but we are the only show doing it. you're the only show the saying every one of these lives matter. we know how to fix this. if they want to fix that they can fix it and they clearly do not want to. at some point, they are aiding and abetting the ongoing death and violence and destruction. thank you both. when we come back, two-tiered system of justice if you don't like trump, you can pretty much get away with everything.

alan dershowitz, lara trump. later, personal suing suing the biden administration and wait until you hear her story about racial discrimination, yep, in the year 2021. straight ahead. ♪ ♪ introducing aleve x. it's fast, powerful long-lasting relief with a revolutionary, rollerball design. because with the right pain reliever... life opens up. aleve it, and see what's possible.

♪ ♪ >> sean: disturbing news tonight to bring you out of a district attorney's office in new york, manhattan, the bronx, despite mountains of evidence including countless surveillance videos and photos and social media posts from offenders admitting guilt, well, the new york d.a. cyrus vance jr. and the bronx d.a. marcel clark the mother dropping hundreds of looting cases from last summer in order to prioritize the ongoing investigation into the trump organization and what is clearly

a politically motivated decision. how do you think you're going to stop arson and how do you stop lawlessness and looting if you get people a gel on a free card? former members of the obama administration starting to criticize the zero experience hunter, former obama ethics chief walter shall is now calling hunter's upcoming art show in which he's selling his art at massively inflated prices to anonymous colliers, $500,000 portraits of a crackhead. the latest of zero experience hunter it seems never ending to get as much money as possible living off his dad's name. recently, revealed text messages show that he called his lawyer the n-word and made several racial slurs about asian-americans and abandoned

the mother of his own child and kicked her off his health insurance after she gave birth to his child. lied on a gun application and then put the gun in a dumpster and imagine if a trump did that. it took money from the first lady of moscow in addition to ukraine and ukraine and oligarchs in kazakhstan, russia, and the chinese national shopping spree and the bank of china deal tied to the chinese military. imagine the outrage that would ensue with maggie haberman and her colleagues at "the new york times" if one of the trump kids did one of these things. well, they never stop their coverage ever. zero experience hunter, joe biden, they get the free pass and one after another for their corrupt actions. in here with reaction, author of the case against censorship alan dershowitz, fox news contributor lara trump,

professor starting with you. just from a purely legal standpoint if you want to stop arson and you want to stop looting, you have evidence that includes videotapes and pictures of the people involved in the crimes, that's kind of incontrovertible and the court of law and at least my understanding of the law. and why would you let people get off the hook like that? >> we need to have a single standing of justice around the country. if you prosecute the people who broke into the capitol building, people who went in innocently and i have a client who was a law student who was investigated by the police. if you're going to do that, you have to apply the same standard of justice to the people of the left who did comparable things in new york, portland, oregon and other places. you have to have a single stand in justice and the same thing's true with biden situation or anybody else.

you have a single standard of justice, and an ethic czar that's neutral. you don't blame candidates for what the children are family members did. the most important thing is a single standing justice. you can't have republican justice, democrat justice, trump justice, biden justice. >> sean: if your husband, eric trump, don jr., if anybody with the last name trump, every did any of the things that hunter biden did, we would know what would happen. if we know what the media coverage would be like and we know what the prosecutors would do. it would be a never ending, nonstop, three year extravaganza. they give him a pass every time. i can only conclude we don't have equal justice under the law in america anymore.

we do not have equal application of the laws anymore. if that should scare every american and i don't care if you're a democrat or republican. >> yeah, could you even imagine, if this was my husband, if it was done, if it was anybody with the last name trump people would be going crazy. because of hunter biden, nobody cares about it and let me just say this, what we see going on in new york city right now, they are not going after these people who clearly broke the law and first of all what kind of precedent does it cite? go out and do whatever you want and nobody's going to be held accountable. you have people that are shooting five and 10-year-olds in the bronx and the horrifying video that we saw over the weekend. they are taking their time and taxpayer money to go after donald trump and it's very clear that they have one motive, sean,

did disqualify president donald trump from running again in 2024. they do not care how many people they let off the hook and by the way a lot of the businesses that were broken into where local small businesses. how do they get by and what about this? it's absolutely disgusting to see and if the media had any integrity and the justice system was equal, than joe biden most certainly wouldn't be president of the united states and hunter biden most likely would be in jail. >> sean: professor, we recently read the report and they got the tax returns for billionaires and they show that many of them that they paid minuscule amounts of taxes even though they are wealth increased. now, they never took income, they held onto their assets and they didn't sell them. the values of the assets went out. so, my understanding of the law

is if you do not take income and you don't pay income tax, that year, at some point you will. but they did it i believe in a way that is dishonest. you see what they are doing it to the trump organization and you have any problem with this? >> and has to be equally applied and the irs has to be neutral, use the way richard nixon used it, can be used against political opponents. the irs has to be absolutely equal. we have to change the law, we have to make sure that people pay taxes even if they do further income. we have to make sure that people with billions of dollars do not pay taxes and the secretaries. that's something democrats and republicans alike should join alike. it is equal justice under the law. you can't have differential -- >> sean: i'm not defending

him, i pay my taxes because i know the laws going to be applied to me and i know everything. but the point is, if they do not take income and if you got the appraisal on your house today it would be x numbers of dollars. maybe it's worth $1 million and you go to sell it may be it not only sells for 750 despite what the appraisal is. there is a difference between the estimated amount of money they have or the stock price today versus a stock price when they sell it. >> that's nuts what's happening, that's nuts what's happening. people are taking money out and spending it. then what they do is taking deductions and not real deductions, but they're not real deductions and so billionaires have all the money to spend. it's income but it is phantom deductions. so, the law has to change. i'm not a fan of many of the

democratic proposals for tax return but i think many in america will be in favor of some kind of a wealth tax of billionaires. if you've got a billion or more, the idea you pay no taxes is not acceptable for most americans. we need to rethink how we tax people and we to make sure that we have equity. equity is the name of the game when it comes to justice. >> sean: thank you both. it's getting to these times and they're interesting i'll tell you that but we won't have any equal justice or application of laws. if that's not good for the country. when we come back a week of flip-flops on the vexing controversies. dr. fauci break the law? he will break it down and much more straight ahead. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> sean: now, dr. doom and gloom flip-flop dr. fauci doubling down on his claims that any attacks on him are attacks on science. while, science is more right than dr. fauci. remember earlier this month during a interview and msdnc, he lashed out at critics for calling him out on his never ending flipping and flopping and flailing. this week during an interview, "the new york times" writers podcast, never knew there was such a thing. and he doubled down on his defense. listen. >> it is essential as a scientist that you evolve your opinion and recommendations based on the data as it evolves. that's the reason why i say people who then criticized me about that are actually criticizing science. i put very little weight in the

adulation and very little weight in the craziness of condemning me. >> sean: meanwhile, the w.h.o. is corrupt as they are, they are now saying at this moment we do not recommend that anybody undee age of 18 get the covid-19 vaccine. remember, the cleveland clinic last week said if you had covid you do not need the vaccine. that's the science and is found she write on anything? it comes after the comments and may in which he stated then that children as young as 4 would likely be getting vaccines by the end of 2021 at the latest. the beginning of 2022. herewith reaction the author of the book "the price we pay" fox news medical contributor marty makary and the legal side legal jeopardy for dr. fauci? fox news legal analyst, gregg jarrett. i don't know if trusting

dr. fauci is trusting the science because dr. fauci science has been wrong an awful lot. >> they are antiscience but not most of us. most have been asking for a more data-driven dialogue. it's turned into modern-day mccarthyism and inordinate natural immunity is a big mistake and still is, dismissed the idea of maximizing the first dose. didn't say anything when doctors were as skinned to pull the extra half dose which would increase the vaccine supply by 50%. there's a lot of big mistakes and as a doctor i can tell you, they appreciate it when i say i'm sorry you made a mistake. people are hungry for honesty. >> sean: let's look at the legal side of this and i thought the emails were quite to dr. fauci and he knew, gregg jarrett, as early as

generate 21st 2020 that people were writing him and telling him that he believed that the gain f function was perpetrated on the virus and he knew that the wuhan lab of virology that they were involved in signing coronavirus and he knew about gain of function and panic to emails about the nih possibly funding the gain of function. do you see any legal opening liability, culpability for him? >> first of all, his arrogance is quite breathtaking. he seems to be immune from criticism and that's ludicrous asking a question about science is not a crime against science. science is all about facts and evidence, testing, debate is necessary, skepticism is healthy, let's not forget, he is a government bureaucrat in a certain measure of distrust is deserving.

in his case, it's earned because he's proven himself to be a master of half-truth, distrust, deceptions, outright lies to which he later admitted. i called it for a criminal investigation of apology ten days ago in a column i wrote for fox news because there's been credible evidence he may have lied to. his group in the nih was used for a dangerous gain of function research. document the line take a look at the grand of the money itself specifically stating it could be used for reverse genetics. if pathology record saying that it's gain of function. so at the very least it is false statement of of cons which is also a crime. there needs to be an investigation apology and

especially to if he was complicit in funding dangerous experiments that may have created a pandemic itself. is it any wonder that he's been pushing an alternative narrative? >> sean: i appreciate the legal side in the medical side, thank you both. and when we come back, you will meet a wyoming rancher who is now suing the biden administration for racial discrimination and she will tell us her story. that is straight ahead. thank you for being with us. his own musical

pain? yeah. here. aspercreme with max-strength* lidocaine. works fast and lasts. keep it. you're gonna need it. kick pain in the aspercreme

♪ ♪ >> sean: a six generation female rancher in wyoming fighting back against the biden administration and what is blatant discrimination against farmers in its distribution of covid relief funds in a recent

"new york post" op-ed titled why i'm suing to stop this blatantly white bill. lisa carpenter writes, i was a new mom when the pandemic it and i was worried about making ends meet and i resorted to selling some of the hurt and i know many wrenching families had to do the same period of where the same on the inside but if you treat people differently based on their outward appearance, you're making assumptions on who they are and where they've come from and what they've had to overcome. lisa and her attorney join us now to explain more. thank you so much for being with us. sometimes when i got sick and tired of it this business i'm in, you know, owning a ranch and being out on my own is quite appealing. i credited ranchers, you feed all of us, farmers feed all of us and you deserve a great deal

of credit. tell us exactly what this is about because i would imagine anybody that's a rancher and anybody that's a farmer, anybody that's involved in keeping us all alive, ages give it to one person should be given to other people, no? >> that is correct. everybody deserves the aid because we've all struggled of ranching and farming for decades and it's been a losing proposition. we struggle against increasing inflation prices and everything while the products remain the same if not lowered. the pandemic hurt and everything hurts. everybody deserves the equal opportunity under government and our flag to deserve the aid to. >> sean: your their attorney and tell us about the legal side of this in the legal merits of this. >> thanks, sean, for having me. we defeated government segregation by race in the 1950s. leisl's here to re-defeat and

fight the same battle that we had to fight over six years ago when the government divides us out by race, that's a sort of dissidence. we are here to fight the fight and take it to the biden administration. >> sean: okay, the government's definition, leisl, includes african-americans, native americans, asian-americans, pacific americans, but we're talking about people doing the exact same work that all society benefits from and clearly we are in need due to circumstances beyond any control that they had -- i'm having a hard time understanding the rationale behind it. because any american that works in ranching are farming, that's feeding the rest of the country, you know, at a time when we need them, should all be getting help equally. >> i agree completely.

95% of us are completely being discriminated against because of our race. it's wrong. we all work just as hard to come a day in and day out and we often joked that we work have our a half days and 12 hours a day. that's common. depending on the season we will put an 18 hour days and we don't even bat an eye. of that's what most ranchers and farmers do. we work year-round to provide a top-of-the-line and nutritious apply. we feed people, we clothe people, we help people in their homes. it's not just food that we provide and it's a very important industry and everybody needs to realize that. >> sean: i you have a strong case and we will continue to follow it. good luck with your business and law suit. it that

lafayette as an alternate to represent the u.s. at this year summer olympics she wrote in an out related facebook porch, her ultimate goal in tokyo is to wi the olympics so she can quote burned a u.s. flag on the podium . you are representing your country. laura ingraham is next. >> it's only a matter of time before there is a concerted effort to rid the country of th fourth of july and all glory, because it's all kind of racist don't you think? it was never about the confederate statues or the flag it was always about the america historical record, and kind of eliminating the entire thing. >> when i watch at hockey games the entire stadium of people,