back tomorrow at 7:00. tucker carlson is up next. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: a good evening and a welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." a few weeks ago a driver for a charterto bus company reached ot to reporters at fox 17 in nashville. he had been told not to speak to the media but she did it anyway. why? because what she was seeing every day on the job was so strange, so without presidents in her 20 year career as a driver that she felt she had to tell the public about it. starting this april the bus

drivers that government agents began instructing her to pick up busloads of migrant children, foreign nationals, from guatemala, honduras, et cetera. the driver wasn't given any information beyond that, she was just told to take those children deep into the interior of the united states away from the border and do it as quickly as possible. there have drop-offs in nashville, knoxville, chattanooga and a couple in atlanta. that's just as far as i go andar then the children continue on further. another source familiar withue what's going on told fox 17 that some of these foreign nationals were taken as far away as new york and chicago and miami. but there's a problem. if you are trying to change a population of the country without the people arty live there finding out it's tough to do with buses because if you pull a bus pact with illegal migrants from a foreign country without the pop proper i.d. or i.d. at all, people tend to notice. so the biden administration came up with a different plan.

"now they are flying because because the buses were easier to videotape going down the highway." we talk about democracy in this country, if you change the population without consent to the people who live there, doesn't that begin to the people who live there? what if it's hardened ideologue decide to people and give it to foreign nationals? that would not be democracy. some of the footage of the bus hauling the illegal migrants surfaced in march. >> what's happening most of the times that they are boarding buses and heading into america's heartland, a conveyor belt of commercial and charter buses just like this one in texas are carrying tens of thousands sight unseen from texas, arizona and california borderlands northward and if they are dropping their haitian, venezuelan, cuban and central america family units in

florida, new jersey, tennessee, massachusetts, michigan, north carolina, georgia and kentucky and two large cities in texas such as dallas and houston. as>> tucker: how is this not the biggest story in the country? you are changing a population of america without the consent of americans who would do it secretly on a hugese scale. and no one is noticing? six months after inauguration day the borders are more open than ever and it tells you what you need to know about the biden administration approaching immigration. we are not going a to stop the flow of migrants across our southern border, no. instead they give the migrants free transportation to anywhere in the united states they choose and when you notice that they don't stopt they find a differet way to do it. how is this not invasion? that's exactly what it is and it's being embedded by the biden administration. here are the numbers. in may of last year a total of

24,000 people were encountered by authorities in the southwestern land border and in may of this year that number had risen to 180,000 people. that's the equivalent of the entire city of chattanooga, tennessee, showing up to the border every single month. and i'm not picking data, that's every single month. last month at 17,000 people showed up. this april the number was 170,000.. if that kind of increased dramatic to the point that your eyes pop open, every month of this year since joe biden became president. in all the number of illegal immigrants crossing the mexico border is already at its highest level since 2006 with four6 months still on counted. and here's what it looks like at the. rio grande. >> in less than an hour the smugglers have brought a group of at least 60 migrants into the united states just in this spot alone. many of them women and children.

what a patrol buses can't get down to the border edge so migrants have to leave them up the hill where they are joined by other migrants. it's big business for the human smugglers who continue to benefit the most from the ongoing border crisis. >> tucker: so that report makes an important point. a lot of people coming over, economic migrants from the largest welfare state in the world and why wouldn't they? we shouldn't allow them but you can't blame them from wanting to. but know all of them are good people with obvious human motives like that, some of them are very badit people. some have pre-existing criminal recordshe. accordingin to customs and bordr protection immigration authorities have arrested 760 illegal migrants since october. last year during the same. they arrested only 60 people. that's a 900% increase in the number of illegal immigrants

detained with criminal backgrounds. either way, that's not all who came here. that includes sex offenders and gang members, and it includes a lot of drug traffickers.as according to the department of public safety, fentanyl seizures of the southern border have and searched more than 800%, andut keep in mind fentanyl is was extremely difficult to detect. it doesn't take much and it's odorless and colorless. it's very easy to smuggle, that's why they do it. the o.d. rates in the united states are off the charts. those deaths are being fed by the drug trade coming across our southern border, it's killing americans. a this is a disaster and the numbers prove it. according to kamala harris, it's progress. >> the men and women who are on the ground doing their job every day, i commend all of them for

the success they've seen thus far, i call it progress. we are not exactly where we want to be but we've seen extreme progress the last few months. >> extreme progress, as the tnumbers rise, and they move se unknown thousands of people into the interior of the united states for the begin new lives again on federal programsw not a slam on them but it's an attack and one we should all join in, on people making the possible questions. there's no oversight at all from the congress and certainly not from the media. the stakes couldn't be higher. at this point there is only one way to stop it, only one man who can end his name is greg have it, the governor of texas. the governor of texas could send the national guard to the border and steal it. as of tonight would believe

greg abbott has deployed a mere 500 of them to the border. why is that? why not seal the border between texas and mexico? california won't do it, arizona may not in texas could tomorrow, but why are they? we wanted to ask greg abbott that question but he refused to come in. one senior official has agreed to address that and we will talk to him in a minute. to begin with someone down there firsthand and seeing what is happening julio process. last night, he was in beaumont, texasnd. >> we are here in roma, texas. at the rio ground right behind me and the coyotes are bringing over the illegal immigrants, right here to the spot in roma which is a very popular crossing area. there's no border patrol, no national guard, it's just us over here.

and there are still more people. this is far from the last trip. >> leo processes the senior writer at townhall.com and he's out the border and has been for a while. thanks so much for coming on. what do you see down there right now? >> basically tucker, what i told you back in march, i'm saying it now and i'll probably say it again in a few months. the fact is, the crisis is continuing down here, and it's very unfortunate that the vice president not only went to el paso which granted has seen its fair share of the crisis but the rio grande is the epicenter for everything because it's easier to cross into the united states. last night we actually came upon that scene while they were midway through the people that were peering across. border patrol was further up and lend an already inundated with

all the people that had crossed before we got to roma. if they continue to cross overo for about another hour and a half and when they were done with their shift we ask them come will they be the same time tomorrow and the coyote said, yes. this is happening every day and it affects the americans who live here on the border but as you pointed out earlier in your show, there are other things like the increase in drugs that are flowing across it affects americans further up north. the only thing good with the trip was to bring back attention to the border because it did kind of go out of the news cycle. but this is happening every single day. >> tucker: so you are one t reporter with the iphone and a notepad and you are documenting this. you have to wonder, where are the federal troops? it seems like this is happening without anyone stopping it from happening. >> what i can say is i've spent a lot of time with the texas highway patrol, they have helped

augment the border patrol here along with the national guard. they definitely need more resources and that's why governor abbott ask for additional support from other states. this is a veryot large section d again, it's a lot of people coming across. what's not being talked aboutcrs the border towns in mexico at the same time this is happening, we are seeing an increase in violence over there. the cartels are getting stronger and stronger and emboldened to carry out mindless acts of violence over there. so we've been advised to not go into renault so which is across from mccowan, the rio bravo is also getting in on the comic inundated as well. it's open borders that we seen today, and it's not good for anybody. >> tucker: is not good for anybody, that's exactly right. julio process. thank you. when several hundred mostly senior citizens got frustrated with the election results in january, broke the law and walked through the u.s. capitol

building, members of congress were so afraid that they built a wall immediately around their workplace. then they brought in the army to protect them. our country has no southern border effectively, you just saw that, and no one is doingha anything and that's totally fine. the question tonight is why isn't the state of texas stopping this? they are border, too. they have a national guard to come they could shut this down. why are they doing that? mr. miller, thanks so much for coming on. i know these problems are famously complicated but o this one is maybe not that complicated. why doesn't texas shut down the border? >> i'm glad our governor is doing something, finally responding. he's been in office seven years and i'm hoping it's not political theater because the basic questions, he hasn't given

us his plan. we need to know where it is a wall need to be built, how much needs to be built, what does it cost and how do we pay for it? those are four basic questionsic that have been answered and i'm glad he's doing something, but we are not doing your enough. problem i have is the timeline. when we knew november 4th or 5th, pick a day, or january 6th when legal avenues were closeden or even on january 20th when biden was sworn in, we knew it was going to be open borders and the welcome mat was going to be out. that's when we should have been doing something down on the border. we should have rolled out the razor wire where the wall had beenir built. we should have contracted our high surveillance aircraft and a got our own drones in the area so we could see where the surge was coming from. once the search was here, look.

we don't care what the biden administration says, you're not coming into texas. >> tucker: that's exactly right. and i think most people in texao regardless of their political affiliation or ethnicity appreciate that we can't be a country without border. what is preventing. governor abbott, who i think wants to be reelected, hard tod, imagine, but i think he does, why -- honestly, what's the answer? >> i think he's the only one that can answer that question honestly. i don't know why he doesn't.ns i'm glad to see president trump coming back to texas, he is welcome here and will be well received in those border communities down there, they let him down there. he won a lot of those counties and cities in the last election that have never been carried by republicans before so welcome back mr. president. >> tucker: 90% hispanic counties voting for trump because of the border.

mr. sid miller, thanks for coming on tonight. m >> any time tucker. >> tucker: we have heard of for years and seen some evidence over the years that the nsa which is chartered to spy on foreign countriesa keep of safe by surveilling our adversary and has been turning its power on americans. on sunday that was confirmed for us because we found out conclusively that the nsa has been reading our emails, my emails from my personal email account. we just got off the phone from a very intense conversation with nsa officials about 22 minutes ago and we will tell you what they are saying about it, next. ♪ ♪

>> tucker: last night we told you about the biden administration's efforts to monitor and end up.ad on sunday we heard from the whistle-blower in the u.s.tl government, someone with direct knowledge warned us of the nsa was reading arun electronic communications, emails and texts and was planning to lick themni selectively in an effort to hurt us. this person had details for my emails that no one outside of the recipient could have known so it was not a delusion, it was entirely real. in fact it was confirmed. after the show when we can fromi this other news organizations acted as if itit was totally

normal for heavy intel agencies to spy. it's no big deal, stop whining. but it is a big deal, it's completely wrong. let's are they the first time the so-called intelligence community has done something like this, they've done an awful lot of it. if we let them continue to do it, it's the end of democracy. democracy can't function with semi-independent highly politicized intel agencies, it's really dangerous. from this part the biden administration ignore the story, they did not deny the story, they can't, they know it's true. today the president was asked about it.s >> tucker carlson's of the nsa is spying on him. as the administration aware of any spying or listening efforts on u.s. citizens by the nsa and is tucker carlson one of them? >> the nsa as i'm sure you're

well aware, as everyone on this plane is aware is an entity that focuses on foreign threats and individuals who are attempting to do was harm on foreign soil. so that is their purview but beyond that i would point you to the intelligence community. >> tucker: it's like she's reading a wikipedia entry. ask them. but here's what you notice, no denial. of course, she's right that the nsa's charter to spy on foreigners, foreigners, o non-americans, that's illegal. and if the nsa does routinely spy on americans, sometimes it does it for political reasons and everyone knows this, including sitting members of the intel community. some are paranoid about their own communication, that's true. in washington this is considered fine, but it's not fine. d it's dangerous and wrong. some faceless hack decides he doesn't like what you think, and he's going to hurt you and nthere's nothing you can do abt

it? that could happen to you. and what it does happen, trust us. they will call you a delusional cue in on conspiracy theorists. this morning we decided to call paul micah sony directly, highly political left-wing and four-star general who runs the nsa but the receptionist refused to put us through. we kept trying because it's not right. this afternoon, we got his direct line and tried again. his assistant was shocked that someone would dare call the director himself. they told us he wasn't there. then just minutes before it aired tonight the nsa sent us an infuriatingly dishonest formal statement, an entire paragraph ofma lies written purely for the benefit of the intel communities lackeys at cnn and nbc, all those people they hire with the titles on the screen. they also tweeted out a few minutes ago. last night on the show we made a very straightforward claim.

the nsa has read my private emails without permission. it comes with this non sequitur. tucker carlson has never been an intelligence target of the agency. okay, glad to know. the question remains, did the biden administration read my personal emails? that's a question that we asked directly to nsa officials when we spoke to them about 20 minutes ago in a very heated conversation. did you read my emails? and again, the refused to say. then, they refused to even explain why they couldn't answer that simpleex question. i can't tell you and we won't tell you why we can't tell you. my emails. the message was clear, we can do whatever you want. we can read your personal texts, your emails, we can send veiled threats your way to brush you back if we don't like her politics, we can do anything. we are our own country and

there's literally nothing you can do about it. we are in charge, you are not. orwellian does not begin to describe the experience, it was like living in china. but we should get used to it. now that the biden administration is caused by tens of millions of patriotic americans, the kind to serve the military and fly flags in front of their homes as potential domesticnt terrorists, and we wl see a whole lot more of this kind of thing. a whole lot more. harmeet dhillon is a civil rights attorney and we are happy to have her on the show tonight. in the text exchange i had a couple of hours ago with you, i expressed my frustration and you said, not the prize all. why can't we find out, this hardly just a place to me. why can't any american find out if some bureaucrat in a spy agency is reading your private email? it's a very simple question. why can'tt we know? >> you should be able to find out and the reason i said i'm not surprised, and the last 20 yearst since 911, i and other

civil libertarians have been screaming about the laws. our government regularly flouts that. we have the example of lying to congress about spying on american citizens and gathering millions of pieces of data, phone call records and all of that. so when you ask why, of course it's about the military industrial complex or the security industrial complex and they justify spying on americans on the name of, we are focusing on foreigners and the american data we scoop up, they call that incidental.y but i suspect if you are able, because you are a person with a lot of connections and this is a good platform, if you are able to find out more information about this i think what you are going to find is that you are being described as incidental. so the gathering of your information will be because they are focusing on somebody else, but i want to break that down. when you look at the carter page violations, the lies to the fisa

court, does anyone think that the national security apparatus was trying to find out carter page's activities and communications? no. the trick is if they can get a surveillance order on individual what they are able to do is scoop up all communications of all the people who reach out to that person, text them, even without any predicate. so that's really where it's at. that's a huge dragnet. when americans have become scandalized or members of congress are asking questions about this, there have been some reining in of these things but now the current law is that the phone companies gather this data and they have to store it. but the nsa can go over and ask for it and go shopping in a treasure trove of billions ofov pieces of data anytime they want to. in fact dating back to 2018 that nsa has looked at her had access to over half a billion records of american communications, so you are one of them but frankly

any important person or enemy of the state should expect if there some way that the nsa can get a hold of somebody near you and get an order or a right to ask questions and questions and all of a sudden they have all the information and a bunch of unelected, faceless bureaucrats are going shopping in your data and talking to the guyou next dr in the cubicle next door, passing around the office and deciding what to do with it. >> tucker: and then threatening me which is exactly what they did. the system you described might work if you had patriotic, nonpartisan, nonpolitical, duty oriented bureaucrats were fighting say, the cold war. but if you change the focus of the war on terror inward against americans who are disobedient or don't support the regime by definition, you will have corrupt ideologues and artisans using this information against american citizens with by the way the help of nbc newsai and n and the entire edifice of connected corrupt news agencies.

>> and let me out a couple of things that will not make you sleep any better. you try to go into court and challenge these are some civil rights organizations, eff and the american civil liberties union, the cases last for over a decade. the case in the ninth circuit is called jewel versus national security agency and for the last 13 years, that case has bounced back and forth up and down the court. so if you can prove that you are being spied on which is all thew glitterati in d.c. are mocking for saying come on the government says welcome because this is a national security issue we can't reveal any information and we aren't going to give you information response to subpoenas. but they don't usually get that far. they say you can't prove it, its anecdotes, you have no recourse or lawsuits against the nsa that have effectively been successful in stopping this spying on a particular american citizen. >> tucker: i hate to even be put in a position where i have

to say this, i'm actually not doing anything wrong. if i was, it would be on the front page of "the new york times" you can be sure. but this can be used against tens of millions of americans who have no power whatsoever and are being reclassified as white supremacists and therefore they are terrorists and will bear the brunt of this type of treatment. so here are the questions that we have for the nsa and we will keep pressing them on a lot of people who receive this treatment but have no recourse. does the nsa have any surveillance product on me or my producers? number two, who authorized the retention of that product? these are all terms of art. and what were the minimization procedures for u.s. citizens and journalists in this case? you explain the last one. i think this is a key safety mechanism that is supposed to protect us from partisan lunacy from mecca sony and people like that. but what's a minimization

procedure? >> they are supposed to make sure their screening that goes into place before it's given to the nsa for use. they may be among the good guys in our national security apparatus, but the fbi has been blatantly abusing the information that the nsa gives it. in reality these are safe policing agencies and there is no effective oversight in congress or the executive branch and they run reap it with this information and they will denies it against american citizens, that is the truth. >> tucker: that's exactly right. and nsa officials said to me, you are carefully overseen by progress. i had to laugh because that's a lie. whatever the nsa does, mitch mcconnell is happy with it on the right and of course the democrats are more than happy to see their political enemies hassled by intelligence

agencies. i appreciate your help on this issue speaking of civil liberty, one of the most popular podcasts in the country.st why did they do that? the podcasts mentioned a drug the silicon valley does not want the public to hear about. the host of p that podcast, whos not a right-winger, by the way, joins us next. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> tucker: and awful lot of people are being censored right now by the big tech monopolies but occasionally you see someone censored and you think, this really isn't a free country anymore and that's our reaction to what happened to brett weinstein. it's an evolutionary biologist two and a former life was a professor at evergreen college who came on here at a time of maybe four years ago. now hosts a very popular podcasts called "the dark host, chorus podcast."

he discussed a drug called remington which is used around the world to prevent and treat the spread of coronavirus. this afternoon, youtube confirmed that it has blocked brett weinstein's channel from generating any ad revenue which is how he makes a living come in part since he left evergreen. they suspended him from the youtube partner program and youtube added that they will not allow any channel to discuss "claims that iver maxton is effective in the treatment of covid." thanks so much for coming on. so tell us what -- those are the bare bones of the story but tell tus what you think this means ad why google would be opposed to talking about ivermectin. that's confusing? in some ways. >> it is confusing but i think the way to understand it is consider the question of what would be ideal from the

perspective of the pharmaceutical industry at the moment? it would be ideal if vaccines were recommended for all people irrespective of their age, irrespective of whether they had already had covid-19 and irrespective of whether or not they were pregnant. and it would be essential that there were no safe and effective alternatives to the vaccine because if there were a safe and effective alternatives to the emergency use authorizations that allow the administration of the vaccines would evaporate. so i think ultimately that is at the root. what we see is that all of those things that i have called ideal and essential are in fact the official position of the cdc which the tech sector has encoded as their censorship policy on social media platforms. >> tucker: it's horrifying. and it was particularly striking since you spent her life as a professor. so you have concluded from watching carefully in your experience that this really is being driven by the pharma

companies? you hate to think that. >> it's a little hard to say. i can say that that's the only hypothesis that i have heard that explains our current position on who should be vaccinated and what treatment should be administered. at the moment is not acknowledged that we have drugs that work on covid-19 so they are not being administered and that is an abomination. even if the skeptics were right, they were not, that ivermectin is strong and works both as a prophylactic and treatment if given early but even if the skeptics were right on the data was inconclusive, because it was a safe drug you would still administer it to people who showed up with covid rather than send them home until they are so thick that they need to be rescued by the hospital. >> tucker: that's exactly right. all kinds of early treatments prescribed around the world china where hydroxychloroquine is a very common therapeutic for covid.

is this country one of the only countries where that's not true or do we just wait until people get so sick that they have to be intubated or hospitalized? >> actually there is a battle around the world and what we have seen is that local authorities have overridden national authorities to good effect and they have it distributed i've, ivermectin but unfortunately what we are seeing here is that the united states is going to be once again relate to the solution with respect to the issues of covid because the edge of many of the pharmaceutical industry and its capture of our public health agencies seem to be so thoroughe >> tucker: that's terrifying. we are in trouble, for real. thanks for coming on tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: so if you have been awake at any point of the last 13 months you may have noticed that the entire political party

has voted to defund the police and that party now runs the white house. but through to the white house is now telling usou that none of that happened and it was the other party that wanted to defund h the police. and now there are certain people in the media, talk show hosts who repeat that talking point as if it's possible into true and expect you to buy it. so insulting, it's not even real. but we have the tape. we will be right back. realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit conventrydirect.com to find out if you policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance. hearing is important to living life to the fullest. that's why inside every miracle-ear store,

you'll find better bedtime stories. you'll find a better life is in store at miracle-ear, when you experience the exclusive miracle-ear advantage. it starts with our free hearing assessment. plus innovative products that fit your needs and budget. with free service and adjustments for life. we're so confident we can improve your life, we're offering a 30-day risk-free trial. call 1-800-miracle today and experience the miracle-ear advantage for yourself.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: it's all across the country, cities have decided not to enforce the law and give criminals free reign over huge parts of the territory. the city of chicago for example has told police officers not to chase criminals, thus releasing people from jail. real criminals from jail, all the time, constantly. the results, so far this year 415 people have been shot in chicago in this weekend alone there were dozens more shooting victims in chicago. >> it has been a violent weekend here in chicago at the police headquarters. at least 63 people shot over the

weekend, three fatalities in last night there were two mass shootings in 17 people were struck. >> mass shootings are gang shootings, but almost all shootings in chicago are gang shootings. the mayor of chicago lori lightfoot insists that actually homicides and shootings in chicago are pretty uncommon. >> many residents in chicago feel that you've lost control of the city and now it appears you've lost control of the chicago city council. do you owe an apology to the victims of violent crime, theio thousands of unsolved shootings and murders and stabbings and random shootings downtown and on the west side? >> once again i ask you to get your facts right. crime is not out of control in our city. in fact crime is on the decline. all of our major indices showed

the decline in crime and are homicides and our shootings, year-over-year are down. that's a fact. >> tucker: it's actually not only not a fact, it's very easily checkable. it's not, is there life on mars, we are not really sure. these are the statistics that we keep the closest track of so that we know that what she said is the opposite of the truth. this is a familiar pattern here. if you can't deal with the reality which you created and are solely responsible for, you just pretend it's not true. at the white house yesterday, joe biden's grumpy little flack suggested that actually it was republicans who were trying to defund the police. really? >> okay, something he said this weekend, republicans defunded the police by not supporting the americans plan but how is that

an argument to be made when the president never mentioned needing money for police to stop a crime wave? >> the president did mention that the american rescue plan, state and local funding, something that was supported by the president, it could help ensure local cops were kept on the beat in communities across the country. that funding has been used to keep cops on the beat. >> tucker: a crime is up because republicans try to defund the police. over the weekend he repeated that talking point like it was true and not some total ludicrous fiction written in the d&c by a teenage summer intern which is essentially what it is. in fact police department's by and large are not funded by the federal government, they are funded by you, the local cops and tax dollars pay for them. so city councils, in city after city, nine out of the ten biggest, they have defunded the

police and last year. and that's true. why not just say we are for it? instead they are telling us unless republicans vote for a $2 trillione spending bill which has nothing to do with crime whatsoever than they are responsible for defunding the police and crime rate shootings. that's what they are saying. and some people on television repeated as if you're going to believe it, like you're a. he must think you're stupid, do they? victor david hanson would know. professor, thanks so much for coming on. i love this technique, you accuse the other side of precisely what you're doing and you never crack a smile as you ofdo it. >> projection but i don't think it's going to work tucker because they are captives of their own aoc squad, that bernie sanders base. the base doesn't believe there's a crime wave and even if there is a crime wave, sort of social

redistribution. of large or socially economic forces whose task is to equalize the playing field. that's what progressivism says. notice in all these cases you cite the one thing that they are especially sensitive to his property crime. the mayor of rawlings' that you gave space for people to burn in the mayor of minneapolis to set it, just brick-and-mortar. the d.a. in san francisco that if you grip $950 of crime, who cares? and hannah jones, the architect of the 1619 projects that looting is not a crime at what they mean by that is, it's sort of a social redistribution and it will continue because these people are victims. if you're going to make a beautiful omelette, it doesn't matter if a few eggs are broken, let's just collateral damage. an accidental shooting, or a deliberate one, it's okay because we are engaged in a big reset. the only reason we have this is,

there are one too many octaves. one too many professional basketball players and one too many people on the inner cities were shot and telling their black caucus members, a way to minute. now they are lashing out with these ridiculous thesis. sort of like the border or the racial division, it's a cosmic agenda and they don't care about the individuals who suffer to they are just little people. and they are exempt, they will never be hurt by the crime wave. nancy pelosi, dianne feinstein, chuck schumer, they have the power to save themselves from the ramifications of their own ideology. >> tucker: take you for your wisdom as always.nk we are going to end of the show tonight come in just a minute when we come back, with the

photograph, and there is some skine but will show it to you anyway despite the fact that this is a family show. we will be right back. ♪ ♪

>> tucker: i want to end the the show tonight on a a strong note, and by that i mean heavily tanned biceps. chris cuomo spent his sunday as he does most weekends hanging with and strangers on social media walls exchanging non sequiturs online, a group that for chris cuomo and so many others in journalism fills the void were actually loved ones should be. he was talking about himself is always when a fellow twitter user essentially told him to be quiet. you're going to break your arm, he said, if you keep giving him the arm. he didn't seem embarrassed, but instead he sent a picture of that very arm.

don't hate, facilitate. facilitate? what's that mean, we are not sure but it sounds like a pickup line. when chris cuomo asked you to fill facilitate him online, it's time to go back to dinner with the family. that's it for us tonight, an amazing interview with a chinese virologist who told us corona came from the lab. tucker carlson today, tomorrow. we will see you then, sean hannity right now. >> sean: thank you and welcome to "hannity." tonight, president sippy cup joe biden is not y s doing wellt again. earlier today, struggling yet again with another public event and more that could be whispering came into play. trouble with the teleprompter and of course, plenty of mass confusion. we will play the low lights coming up. plus china's puppets in the w.h.o., world health organization, and california's gavin newsom. they want