thank you for watching and thanks for planing emily. thanks for watching crime time on jesse watters. don't forget you have to get a new copy of how i saved the world. it is all right there. it is a beautiful book and it will make you laugh, cry and make you think. it is available. i will be back at six 7:00. tucker carlson is up next. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: the nsa has been reading our emails. we told you two nights running because it is true. the nsa has conceded. grand greenwald with pulitzer surprise for exposing nsa extensive surveillance of american citizens. this is not a new thing but widespread. and in a moment we are joined by glenn greenwald to expose what

we know about what our government is doing to us. but first tonight, good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." last week democrats in new york city voted for a new mayor. the end of de blasio era. new york is a one-party state with exotic esperanto speakers in new york city so primary effectively the same as the general election. that is the vote. in new york part of some battles come all the bickering between different shades of corrupt left-wingers. in some way it would be easier to get elections done. but you would be wrong. eight days later, we still have no idea who the next mayor of new york will be. all votes are in. they have all been counted supposedly. the problem is no one in charge can do math. in addition is the main stumbling block. it is hard to overstate just how embarrassing this is. in brazil a poor country where a lot of people have far less than the homeless do in new york city, the latest

national election took a total of four hours to tally and added up all the votes and then announced the results. that is how it is supposed to work but not in new york. it is just too complicated all those numbers. after last november's election, it took three months for new york's board of elections to figure out who the state would send to congress and took that long the next mayor of new york city is. the funny thing is as of yesterday morning, it seems pretty clear. eric adams the former new york city police captain is ahead of everyone in the race by double-digit lead. in the afternoon, things changed dramatically. city officials released a new vote tally in fact, adams might lose. his 12-point lead had shrunk to two points and still thousands of absentee balance outstanding. how could that happen? it is impossible. nothing like that had ever happened in the history of this country, at least since november in the presidential election. eric adams understandably wanted to know what the hell is going

on. so we asked and in response to his question the guardians of democracy mocked him. questions about an election result? you must be donald trump. adams accused of engaging in corrosive big like conspiracy theorizing. this is donald trump crap some kid at fox. and declared election fraud. we could go on. we were starting to think that q and anna was involved and eric adams staging insurrection. and then late last night, we found out adams was right to be skeptical. we found out from journalist sneering on twitter but the facts of the case brought to us by people betting the online prediction markets and in the mayor's race with the outcome. they can do the math and they realize the numbers were fraudulent. based on their reporting come

again they are not even reporters from a few hours later officials and new york had to release a new statement and it board of elections station assuming it exist. the statement drafted on the application from an iphone that it was screenshot it and then posted on social media. the message? we are totally winning. the state explains the city's vote tally had "included both test and election night results producing approximately 135,000 additional records." additional records? what is an additional record? that is a fake vote. 135,000 fake votes. that is the debacle so profound that even bill de blasio gave glassy eyed from one hitter claimed to be totally blown away. >> deeply disappointing and indicative of the fact the board of election is broken, structurally broken and must be changed. i don't know how many times we

will have this conversation. we can no longer have a partisan board election, it does not work. it is not modern and it is not professional. >> tucker: it is structurally broken. you have that so often always to justify some power grab in history. what a structurally broken mean? well, it means that dumb, incompetent, honest people in charge. in other words the problem is not the system but it is the people running the system. in new york it is a problem. last year "new york times" reported "some staffers from the election board read or watch netflix at the office. others regularly failed to show up to work with no discipline." some staffers punch in and leave to go shopping or go to the gym. one employee said the newspaper "caught worker smoking marijuana at the brooklyn voting machine warehouse on election night. but remember, america don't question the election results.

only fascist dude that my fascist! and the qanon army! and finally to complain to new york like a lot of things, bedbugs for example all over new york. we don't have them. kind of hilarious that they have them. but this is not confined to new york. the very same people running the new york city primary demanding a full volume and if you don't agree you are a racist, control of the whole countries -- remember hr 1? that is what that is. put people in charge of your election. and that should worry you because these people are incompetent. they have no skills of any kind. they could not paint a garage door if they had to. they don't know where food comes from. they don't make their own beds. they are useless which is why they were so miserable. people with skills are unhappy. they are totally incapable of discipline or precision. now a long time ago we created

gender study programs precisely for people to do during the day. kind of get them out of circulation, give them a little job to do. but it wasn't enough for them. now they want real power. they like control of the power appear they want to play your airplanes. now they want to run your election spirit you can't do that. not only are they without skills, there are crazed ideologues and they think math is racist. for hundreds of years, the united states the best election system in the world. you vote on election day in person and prove who you say you are a newspaper so there is no question who you voted for because we can all check. they do it for today, canada for all of their problems that is how they run their elections. most of the rest of the world do that. but no, we can't do that anymore because of racism. instead, we put people like this in charge of our elections. >> listen, i get it. i don't like the two-party system. i think our party is corrupt and

quite frankly, i don't want to vote for biden. it feels like i'm voting for a republican. but i will do it but you want to know why? because the alternative is [bleep]. [bleep] >> [crying] this is stupid! >> after being republican, knock that off. they will start in breeding anyway. >> i'm terrified! listen to me, republicans, listen! you want the people in the history. they warned us about, they warned us about people like you! pay attention! we are losing our democracy! >> tucker: yep! that is the coalition, the coalition of the unhappy.

let's keep them on tick-tock, shall we? we are losing our democracy. it is pretty amusing in this specific case given a few years ago the city of new york changed the election laws to make the process less democratic. instead of just counting all of the ballots and choosing a winner based on who had the most votes, that is called democracy. new york, along with the state of maine and a couple of other places have a system known as a ranked choice voting. in ranked choice voting people don't vote for one canada on the ballot, no. because the system is confusing enough, they rank up to five candidates in order of their preference. it is a multiple-choice test. then once all the ballots are counted, the candidate with a low number of first choice votes is eliminated and the key part all of the votes from a eliminated candidate are reallocated to the other candidate. following this? so if last-place, your vote is

reallocated to the next candidate on the list. this process repeats for several rounds. it is hard to imagine anything pointlessly complicated or crazy or undemocratic than this. voting lets the losers pick the winners. so why in the name of democracy would you prefer that? well with most bad ideas at this point, first choice voting is a product of the equity praise. democracy is not the point. the people who lobbied for ranked choice voting in new york were explicit why they were doing it. one of those who lobbied for it is a woman amy torres who told lawmakers a couple of years ago in 2019 that ranked choice voting is an option that really would increase the power of the asian-american pacific islander electric because we would be in a the elect where it." the first tip-off and insanity

of all of this is insisting powers people based on skin color or that it is racist and wrong and we should object it every time. but as a legal matter, what did she just say? and of course, the answer was nothing. it is and so often is meaningless word south, to hide rather than expose the point of ranked choice voting. the real point is that it gives the people in charge a lot more power than they had before. it gives them more control over the outcome. you are seeing this in new york. it should not be a surprise to anyone people running in new york with ranked choice voting to shaft eric adams. why is that? eric adams is african-american from a liberal, and you would think white liberals in new york would love him. oh, no, they hate him. interesting, why is that? because he says things that are true. things like, maybe we should not allow criminals to knife people on the subway.

>> it doesn't make any consolation if a police officer shoots someone illegally or aching bangor in blue jeans. no matter what community i am in people want their families to be safe and that resonates with everyday new yorkers and i know my message will resonate with them. when i say to the city companies are not coming to new york out of multibillion-dollar tourism industry will not be turned and shot at grand central station peer of the first order of business is to get violence under control. >> tucker: oh, it is interesting. so by saying maybe it's a good idea, you have a subway where you can use so you don't get shot waiting for your train. eric adams he would reunite the city across racial lines. guess what? he did appear at every normal person agrees with that, he won in new york city and staten island. you think white liberals would

be happy about this. they hate it. they want to stop eric adams. eric with a new york, new york, magazine was pretty honest. in a column he described to eric adams who is a full-blown liberal, by the way as two right wings and then he said in a line worth remembering, he said eric adams is conservative because his base is nonwhite voters. how interesting is that. he is acknowledging that eric adams is polling nonwhite voters and his exact quote. that is why he has a white liberal cannot support it. that is amazing! in other words, eric adams is not under their control. he is against defunding the police. he's not funded by george soros. he doesn't have some dystopian nihilistic view of what the city

should be. he doesn't talk about equity is much as the rest of them. so they are not under his control and he wants to crush them. he is too right wing. they are admitting out in the open appear at the board of directions invented 100,000 votes to bury eric adams. it's not hard to see why they are doing it. when you don't need voters. unbelievable, the columnist, we are happy to have her on tonight appear to carroll, quick questions, one -- >> yeah pure it's been with the democratic party of new york and i got to say proven incapable of running a simple election, count the results. now they want total control of all elections nationally. is there anything in the track record? >> there isn't, no and you know what this is not the first election in new york that this has happened. in 2019 governor cuomo sign the

election laws, every election since then has been a disaster. the democratic primary in june was not ranked voting but a complete debacle of special election of february. that was a disaster and recently counting the votes. here we are again. they don't learn anything we keep repeating the same mistakes. i think you said it best where when into the voting booth, paper ballots, produce an i.d. and a system that made sense. what we have now makes no sense and the fact they want to spread it to other states should worry everybody watching. the one we are not giving people who are totally incompetent who literally have no skills of any kind control of our elections or power grid come i would think. second, eric adams very liberal guy, black brooklyn president and they hate him because he's not for defining the police. i would think that white progressives would love the guy. why did they dislike him so much

questioning >> progressive has become an anti-police movement. it is always rich progressives who don't want police departments. as you said, all over the the city photo for adams and a front-page endorsement because he was the most plain candidate running in the race. and so we got into a place the voters vote for adam and white manhattan don't. it is a real issue and a real spread and divide in the democratic party for the white liberals don't like crime-fighting black guys. >> tucker: whose side are you on carol markowitz? >> i'm on the side of safety, tucker carlson, like safety and my streets and a candidate that will make that a priority and if he's the best of the democratic bunch, well, that is what it is. >> tucker: i will take wings over williamsburg any day. good to see you tonight, thank you. >> think is much, thank you. so we told you nsa had read our

emails and threatened us, which they did but effectively admitted they did read our emails. we asked them serious questions on air about the extent of the survey. and exposed nsa mass surveillance of americans under the obama administration. and we will assess their response next. ♪ ♪

the boss is back baby!

the difference in try and triumph... is just a little umph! upsees, i need upsees. i'm sure this isn't something money can't solve? what the fudge? oh my gosh, oh my gosh, oh my gosh!

♪ ♪ >> tucker: a couple of days ago, we told you the national security agency had read our emails and in fact, threatening with leaking them. this is not a statement you would make lightly and go on tv to say the government is spying on me except when it is true and of course, it's not just the show. they are spying on a lot of people. it should stop. it is illegal. yesterday we had a long conversation with the officials at national security we had a statement out of them and they and they conceded our email. they have some justification for it but it was not justified. it never is accepting cases when national security is. nothing that we did. liberals used to understand that peer they are very worried about this program. back in 2006, joe biden himself said he was worried about spying american citizens.

>> i don't have to listen to your phone calls to know what you are doing. if i know every single phone call you made, i am able to determine a versatile person you talk to. i can get a pattern about your life that is very, very intrusive. the real question is, what do they do with the information that they collect that does not have anything to do with al qaeda? we are going to trust the president and the vice president of the united states that they were doing the right thing. don't count me in on that. >> tucker: joe biden is in charge of the national security apparatus, and his administration has turned on americans who have redefined as combatant domestic terrorist, white supremacist. where does this go from here? we think we know and we are deeply concerned about it. we know the nsa is collecting data from american citizens, spying on them. and it is hard if you call it spying which is exactly what it is. let's quit using that language spying. the house judiciary committee today senior microsoft

executives said most americans would be stunned if they knew how often the federal government used secret borders to collect information on them. >> there reek it don't make those secret investigations is shocking. most shocking is just how routine secrecy orders have become when law enforcement targets americans email, text messages or other sensitive data stored in the cloud. throughout the obama/trump and iran and up to one-third of demands from law enforcement include secrecy orders spirit up to 3500 in just one year. these are just the demands on microsoft. add the demands likely served on facebook, apple, google, twitter and others and you get a frightening sense of the secrecy orders used by federal law enforcement in recent years. >> tucker: so what we need is an investigation into what exactly is going on.

the largest bureaucracy in the history of mankind. there has never been a organization larger than the american federal government. so we need to know what the important parts of it, the parts with a lot of power are doing in our name. we need an investigation. today at that hearing at least one member of congress, matt gaetz of florida called for that. >> i just watched cable news host who has been stating the last several nights that the nsa has been monitoring his communications. amazingly the nsa has issued a statement that is so pouched it is functionally and a missing bowl. and it's not like the nsa has ever lied to us. we were told that there was no collection of american data. turns out, there were collection of america data. we cannot count on these people to police themselves. join me for calling

inspector general investigation into any monitoring that the nsa or any element of intelligence community has engaged to in regards to tucker carlson. these raise more questions than provide answers. >> tucker: they gather the information and they threaten you with it. information is power. the more they have, the more power they have over you. if they don't like your politics -- we do need an investigation. the house minority leader kevin mccarthy of california has called for that. an investigation for the house intelligence committee. we will see what happens. meanwhile, one of the people responsible for what we know about what the nsa does, mass surveillance of the obama administration. he joins us tonight, thank you so much for coming on. your position on this has remained consistent for more than a day and lois is security threat. shouldn't be targeted by spying. why is that not the position of

everyone in journalism? >> that is a really good question. you know interestingly i did the reporting with edward snowden in 2013-2014, liberals love the reporting so much that they gave us every rewarded him with the blitzer the film done about my work with edward snowden. the oscar stage, they couldn't lavish and of prizes and praise on us. now, here we are after the trump years in the democratic party and journalism in general has aligned with the cia, fbi, and nsa. and so in response to the resort you did, they would think other journalist just out of self interest even if they dislike ideology in you would say we want to know using your powers in order to spy on journalists. instead they mocked it. oh, he has to be paren paranoid

in order to think this. anna statement i've seen over and over, tucker the last eight years to mislead the public pier they use carefully constructed words to say "tucker carlson is not intelligence target by the nsa, which may be true, but what that leaves out is there are so many other ways that they have to spy on the communication of americag you a target or getting a warrant. they have huge authority that really haven't been rain and since 2013-2014. i'm glad to hear kevin mccarthy and other g.o.p. leaders calling for an investigation, but the reality is bipartisan washington nancy pelosi, chuck schumer have been joining with the likes of mitch mcconnell to expand and kill any attempts to reform it so these are kind of empty words. >> tucker: i totally agree with that. mitch mcconnell is 100% on board with what they do. i have texting and calls from political asking "who are you

emailing? "you would never claim emails are being read by the government unless you can prove it by the crazy person and it happened. now the line is, you must have been emailing the wrong people. i was under the impression as american journalists i have the right to email anybody i want here it is that not the standard any longer? >> talk or ponder authoritarianism. think about the premise there. they are saying if you talk to somebody that the nsa has decided to be spied upon, it means that that person come even though church with no crime and a convicted of nothing is up to no good appeared like a terrorist or a threat and you, yourself, also the whole point of the reporting is the nsa spies on millions and millions of people indiscriminately. if you are a journalist it is impossible not to talk to a target of the nsa. they target everybody constantly all the time to hear that his wife a huge sprawling agency. but the authoritarianism with

journalism if you are talking to somebody the nsa doesn't like, you are a bad person. >> tucker: we are not going to put up with this at all. once they have the information, they threaten to control you and that is what they were trying to do it to us. we appreciate your reporting, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: one of the very first people to say that coronavirus had originated in a lab in wuhan. she knew this because she was a chinese virologist who was studying where this virus came from. she told the truth, and she had to -- we just had an hour-long conversation and one of the most important ever on the show about why the chinese government developed this virus. we will talk to her next. ♪ ♪

do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a term policy, for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life

insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit conventrydirect.com to find out if you policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance. omega-3 from fish oil is an important nutrient for heart health. qunol's ultra purified omega-3, is sourced only from wild caught ocean fish, not farm raised and comes in an easy to swallow mini pill. the brand i trust is qunol. >> tucker: dr. lehman young is a position in virologist. she is an expert on coronavirus. until last year, she was living

and working in china, in fact investigating the outbreak in wuhan. but she had to flee this country because she reached the wrong conclusion. the coronavirus is not naturally occurring but it had been designed, she said by the chinese military. now at the time in this country, she was censored for saying that but now we know the virus did come in fact, come from a lab. we spoke to the doctor with her new episode of "tucker carlson today" just out now what she knows about covid and why it was developed for the chinese government. here is part of it. ♪ ♪ >> i want to be clear about what you are saying. sars happened years ago with the chinese military to decide this is an effective virus to turn into a bio weapon appear they find source covert to and doing research on it to make it a bio weapon. they tested in wuhan and it gets

out of control. they didn't expect that to happen. and at that point they realize, okay, it is out. they lied about that, but then they intentionally let out a huge number of people, some invective from wuhan who traveled around the world to travel and the rest of the world. >> exactly, you know, china is the best country, the best in the world. and had all the material from that time. so they go to the u.s. and other countries with the best technology and use it for modifications for many years. and then when they found the appropriate virus from china, at the function. the function -- [indistinct]

so finally, the whole virus was carried two different functions. and that is why -- and the population and also why the real backbone from the military. because how many functions they added to that. >> tucker: so many questions. let's just start with the virus itself. you heard eminent very famous highly respected american researchers and virologist staking "we have taken a look at this virus and there is no chance it could have been

manufactured in a lab." >> i know this kind of people will tell you that it does not come from a lab, but what i can tell you china government spent many years with scientific work. and also, i know the china government have their own purpose. and who may not have experienced a virus. and so [indistinct] they just try to use this information to help china government for their own benefit. and later reviewed it gradually. >> tucker: they should be in prison if that is true immediately. so you are a virologist. so you look at this virus and is it obvious to you it is

manufactured? >> yes, based on the real virus and as i said, all of the functions i can examine in my paper, [indistinct] , what function is learned and [indistinct] so they changed the structure and even much better in animals. that is why you can't find the nature of the host because the other animals cannot carry it so well. in china, it happened in the u.s. they just lock down you in a room. so you can be at home when it happens. >> tucker: people starve to

death in their home. >> you don't know if you have covid or not. >> tucker: but they were not allowed to leave so they died of starvation? >> yes, that is why china claims they can control the virus very well. tiktok, media to show the democrat country and even make americans and china is great. but trust me, terrible policy. >> tucker: that was the conversation. it was shocking. it was fascinating, i learned a ton. hard to assess some of it, but it was definitely worth watching. by the way, the doctor goes on about her life in the united states in that conversation and the efforts for the chinese government to silence her here. you can watch the whole thing on foxnation.com. it is up right now. ♪ ♪ >> we told you about the plan of the infrastructure bill to

eliminate the suburbs by banning their ability to zoned for single-family housing. oh, how would you like section 8? you don't like it? you are a bigot. a major escalation in that effort next in atlanta. from buckhead. we will tell you what they are doing next. ♪ ♪

[swords clashing] - had enough? - no... arthritis. here. new aspercreme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: so equity is the idea of the outcomes have to be the same for everybody. whether or not you agree with that idea, if you had to put it into practice, well, okay. people not doing well to help them do better. that is not always the current administration. the idea is we will take people doing well and hurt them and bring them to people that are not doing well. the first thing i would like to do is destroy the suburbs. why? the suburbs are nice, leafy, open space and not too many people. they work well. they are safe. so let's wreck them. that is what they are planning to do, wrecked the suburbs. the way to do this has by cutting funding from local government, including four roads unless they eliminate single-family housing.

that is what is happening now in buckhead, which is a safe and pretty, once and safe anyway neighborhood in the city of atlanta. according to the report by the housing committee, which adopt a bite when officials "alanna should amend this zoning code to house exclusionary single-family zoning areas designated for design for race and class discrimination." in other words, if you don't want an apartment building or section 8 housing on your block, you are a bigot. the same they use to get everything they want. the question is, but they fall for it? bill white and ceo of buckhead committee, thank you for coming on. you don't have enough vagrants and buckhead either. not enough panhandlers but maybe you are a racist. that is what they are saying, just too nice. >> tucker, thank you for having us on. i just want to say i got up with senator clint dixon and he informed us that when a police

officer that was literally shot in the face is going to make it we are so happy to report that to you and the viewers that great heroic policeman are making it. you have a lot of common sense on this. if atlanta needed lower income housing they would build residential powers and existing zones versus rezoning the established neighborhoods that have 100-year-old oak tree canopies. there is an agenda here. buckhead residents are on it. the lack of interest in cracking down on crime is linked to the agenda as well. we have a mayor who has opted not to run again, but she won't resign. it is obvious she has an agenda to destroy the beautiful community of buckhead on her way out in a full process if i may. she will let crime continue. she will let infrastructure deteriorate, and she will resolve to destroy the quality of life and our beautiful buckhead. this is buckhead and forget my property values would go basically 20 because how will i

sell my house when a developer is developing condos next to me? it is absurd, marxist land grab for sure and we have to reject that, tucker. >> tucker: not just reject it but reject with maximum aggression and speed. they hate hate you, hurt you and couldn't be clear about that. are people in buckhead prepared to put up resistance for this? this is kind of central. >> yes, sir we are prepared to fight. i found this out the last 48 hours in advance of telling folks we would talk about this tonight. we have republicans, democrats, independents, and we have tree canopy environmentalists who are furious with this. she is trying to insert this, by the way i'm on the way out as a slip and mayoral executive order. and tim kaine, the design genius who thought this up with the planning commissioner he has lied to the public and public testimony that he's really not

doing this but it still on the city's website so this garbage has to stop here that is why buckhead city will make a great municipality without any of these crazy policies going forward. thanks to your help, tucker, people know what we are doing. >> tucker: i hope so. it is just so clearly an act of hate and aggression that they just don't like you. they couldn't build the neighborhood you live and so they want to destroy it. i really hope you fight them. >> we will fight, tucker. i hope you follow the story. we will keep you posted. >> tucker: thank you, good to see you. >> thank you sir. >> tucker: actually turned out to be interesting, britney spears, that saga has a new turn tonight from a judge. she is under conservatorship who has controlling her life for years. and maybe to get married. we will tell you about it after the break. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> tucker: fox news alert for you, a judge has denied a request from britney spears lawyer to free her from conservatorship we told you about and remove her father jamie spears as a conservator. according to tmz which we are quoting on the air, the judge approved a plan to name coconcern for her and to determine exactly what this means. thank you so much for joining us tonight. this is one of those cases i never thought it would be interesting but it tells you something about the country come

i think appearance of what we know tonight based on the judge's orders? >> well, tucker it looks to me the judge is not listening to britney. what really concerns me is the other stories that came out today where one conservator is defending her against claims that the father is making against claims that britney is making and now you have people who are supposed to be looking out for britney spears best interest arguing with britney spears in public about what they are doing or what they are not doing. i want to include who is looking out for britney? it certainly does not look like the judges. >> tucker: what i'm i missing? the underlying claim is britney spears is so crazy that she can't make even basic decisions about her own life, but she also has a high-paying job. so how do you score those two points? >> tucker, it is hard to square those two points, especially after you listen to britney's impassioned and intelligent plea

for herself last week and that hearing. she seems to be -- he completely understands what is happening. she understands she is under conservatorship. she knows what the limits are on her. it is very hard to understand how a judge 13 years after they posed conservatorship with a mental health issue continues to say that she cannot make her own decisions. >> tucker: it is all very, very, very strange. i hope they don't do it to us. [laughter] good to see you tonight, thank you so much. we will go down to judge jeanine pirro and she's in tonight. judge, good to see you tonight. what does this tell you? >> you know, i must tell you that my instincts tell me there is something very wrong here. and whether britney needs new attorneys or whether there needs to be a judge here makes more sense than this particular judge.

she is a highly functioning woman who is able to disciplineo on tour. all of a sudden, she is not capable of making a decision whether she can have a child or not have a child, whether or not she can breathe in her kitchen? something smells here. i must tell you the way to start is to get new attorneys on this because if the prior attorney -- i don't know her name, but if the opposing party is agreeing with each other, something smells here. anna does not -- this isn't something that a lot of people e getting involved in because she has a functioning individual. she is almost 40 years old and she is not being allowed to make decisions about her own body and about whether or not she can redo her kitchen. this is bizarre. it is absurd, and it is unfair. >> tucker: for your whole body, your choice stuff they didn't really mean it. what bothers me if a judge thinks what you are saying is

irrational, then you and i would be in trouble. [laughter] >> depending on the judge. but that is for psychologist/psychiatrist to say. judges are in a position to assist with evidence and not form their own opinions whether or not someone is competent. it is based on evidence and scientific evidence. i'm not seeing any of the era but in fact, the opposite. >> tucker: judge, we will see at 10:00. thank you so much. ♪ ♪ >> sean: welcome to "hannity." we are broadcasting from the south texas airport and only a few miles from the u.s./mexico border for the entire hour. we will be joined by 45th president of the united states, donald j. trump with texas governor greg abbott and we will also asked president about