♪ ♪ >> sean: the islanders started this. it happened again and tampa. ed needs to happen to every sport. take over the anthem. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham, that gives me goose bumps. >> laura: yes. and hannity, great moment. america loves patriotic spirit, and it was a great show, and i'm jammed. >> sean: for the people to do that everywhere and shut down politics and sports. >> laura: you got it. awesome show, sean. and i will see you tomorrow. i'm laura ingraham. this is "the ingraham angle" from washington. his facebook, twitter, and youtube over their alleged censorship? are they going to be finally held accountable? finally have to answer for silencing opposing voices,

including donald trump? today his team filed a class has been lawsuit against the zuckerberg cabal, the lead attorney's units as of late to lay out his legal path to victory. but first, power grabs and needle jabs. that's the focus of tonight's angle. every day, the barbarity of covid lockdowns and school closures becomes more apparent. the great global -- who love seeing us set in and shut up were fine were our economy destroyed in even turning kids into screaming zombies. the political forces that exploited health fears, the medical officials who became stars by helping them, and the media that covered for them all. all of them should be held accountable. now, it took a while, but americans are wising up to this charade. yet despite everything the experts either got it wrong or lied about, they still think that parents should trust them and eject their kids with an experimental drug to prevent a

disease almost none of those kids will ever get sick from. >> obviously parents need to decide this and kids need to decide this from themselves. if you're of a 12 it is safe to get vaccinated and smart. >> laura: we in the u.s. have determined it is safe and smart. are big pharma overlords have decided that we need to get rid of these vaccines before they expire. while just like the so-called public health experts, the media have zero credibility and maximum culpability here. remember, most adults have gotten at least one shot. many more already have natural or acquired immunity through prior exposure to covid. or likely already had herd immunity in most parts of the country. but none of that, none of those facts are going to stop them from promoting the government's vaccine pressure campaign, especially the one that will target her children. "the san francisco chronicle" published a column yesterday that was wilde saying my husband

had a stroke after his covid vaccine. we gave our kid a shot anyway. she wrote, "as my husband recovered at home, my son stuck his arm at the car window and got his job. "insane. most media outlets refuse to even discuss the adverse reactions that have been leaks to the vaccine even among kids. >> and had three times for a total of two -- >> laura: the responsible question to pose is, which presents the greatest risk? a child developing a serious reaction of the vaccine or a child getting seriously ill from covid? in michigan, rising high school

freshman died three days after getting his covid vaccine that the experts say is so safe and smart. he complained of, and post vaccine symptoms, but in the two good days between his immunization and death, jacob went to sleep that night and never woke up. but these stories, including the risk of heart damage, rarely if ever get mentioned in that white house briefing room. why? because being honest about the true risk-benefit analysis would actually help their credibility. but inside, the government officials just seem to be getting more and more desperate. remember, they dangled cash lotteries, free concert tickets, and even free beer to increase vaccinations. but biden still didn't reach his 70% july 4th target. so whoever is making the decisions in the white house decided i guess it is time to intensify the pressure campaign. >> targeted community --

door-to-door outreach to get remaining americans vaccinated by ensuring they have the information they need on how both safe and accessible the vaccine is. >> laura: going >> laura: going door-to-door? this is creepy. stop. someone comes up to your door outside wearing a mask showing up at your house climbing to work for the government. asking you personal medical questions. what could possibly go wrong there? by the way, are these government vaccine ambassadors going to ask people about their vaccine status? what sort of notes will they take on each door to door encounter? and what will be done with those notes? how will this information be used? these are all important questions that bear directly on matters of personal medical privacy. but the biden administration can always just rely on their big business and university pals that all end up getting some federal help or federal money, and they will end up doing the strong-arming for the government against all those hesitant

americans. >> there are a lot of companies, over 500 colleges and universities, a growing number of the hospitals, health care systems, that are mandating vaccines for their employees, for their students. they want to create a safe environment for everyone. >> laura: speaking of creepy, how ironic that a woman who once headed up the biggest abortion provider in america thinks she is an expert on creating safe environments? the fact is the past year has shown us that federal and state officials must never be allowed to abuse their emergency powers again. as we predicted, now it's about a year ago that we said this, blue state governors are going to be using things like gun violence, change, and racism to claim new emergency powers and then expand their authority and once again erode your constitutional rights. so i say it is time to lock them down. and that's the angle. joining us now, professor of

medicine at texas a&m, dr. peter nichola the cells of the vaccines are getting more aggressive, more dy surrounding the kids. what you make of this? >> i think it's a giant mistake. overall, the equation is very unfavorable for vaccination of anyone below age 30. we know that there are different risks that the fda has acknowledged from and pfizer the writ, risks are inflammation of the heart and then with girls and women, aged 18 to 48, it's the risk of -- in the brain. the vaccine has a dangerous mechanism, they hijack the body's sale your machinery to produce the dangerous spike protein, and that happens within sensitive organs like the brain, the heart, the circulation, the

blood stream, and causes blood clotting. for those reasons, unless we have a compelling case, no one under age 30 should be done i perceive anyone of these vaccines. >> laura: yesterday it was dr. investment was on cnn and he was saying this just demonstrates the vaccine hesitancy that we need to just speed up the fda's formal vaccine approval, doctor. how is leapfrogging the normal vaccine approval process the right answer here? >> are sent us his possessions and from doctors and from nurses saying that they are simply not safe enough for approval. for a gender 18, we arty have 15 tests reported in the first event reporting system, 75 deaths under age 30. that simply too high or an illness that now is very infrequent, it smiled, and very treatable. >> laura: hold on. doesn't that normally take seven

to ten years or even longer? >> or even longer. so the dossier of needed studies is in there. >> laura: it's antiscience, that's all and saying. dr. fauci was on television tonight and he had a message for those who don't want to get the vaccine. watch. >> were not asking anybody to make any political statement one way or another. we are trying to save your life. it's easy to get, it's free, and it's relatively available. so you have to ask what is the problem? get over it. get over this political statement. just get over it and try and save the lives of yourself and your family. >> laura: that's not arrogant or anything. your quick response. >> have gone over six months, there has been no safety reports on the cdc. americans are worried. >> laura: thank you. and in march, and new law went into effect in washington, d.c.,

that allows kids 11 and up to get vaccinated without parental consent. i kid you not. now josh -- sues the department of health after his 16-year-old daughter resident of another state travel to d.c. and requested that she get a vaccine for summer camp without her parents knowledge or consent. majors says he was opposed to his daughter getting vaccination not just because of religious belief but also because she had severe reactions to multiple vaccinations when she was only five. joining us now is the attorney representing their family. your clients daughter did not end up getting the vaccine, so what are your clients damages in this case? >> we are not seeking any monetary damages, laura. we are seeking to enjoin washington, d.c., from enforcing and implementing this law. so that my clients daughter can't go back to another doctor in washington, d.c., and get the

shots without her parents being present. as you pointed out, my clients daughter did previously suffer serious adverse reactions to a vaccine when she was five years old. she wasn't aware of that when she went to her doctor in washington, d.c., recently. she was in the way she had that reaction. so she wasn't aware to tell her doctor about that reaction to the vaccine. and the cdc and the manufacturers of that product say aid is a precaution to obtain another dose of it. if you have had that prior reaction. so without her parents being present, without them being involved, she could have made a potentially very dangerous decision medically. >> laura: i have a comment and a question paired how did she get to a doctor's office without either parent present question marks because she recently turned 16 and so she had access to somebody who is able to assist her in getting there. >> laura: you referenced elaborate subterfuge on the part

of the doctor at georgetown pediatrics. explain what that was. >> the law itself in many ways provides for -- you could call it an elaborate subterfuge on the parents. what it says is that a child comes in, 11, 12, 13 years old and up, nasa pediatrician, doctor, were anybody else to give them a vaccine not only is the doctor to give the vaccine, the law actually requires the doctor, the school, the health insurance company, and the health department to all actively concealed from the parent that the child has received the vaccine. when i grew up, i was told you're not supposed to lie to your parents feared this law is not only encouraging line, it actually mandates by law that it child who participates with

those who the child would normally view as members of authority in on a elaborate scheme of lying to their parents. >> laura: i think people across the country are hearing this and they actually can't believe it. parental rights being completely sublimated, attacked, oppressed, suppressed in d.c., codified. i'm glad you filed this lawsuit. going to be tracking this very closely. thank you. some 16 months into their emergency cover declarations, governors like -- refuse to give up emergency power that they declared. this is odd because illinois covid case the load is plummeting if you look at the graph it's down to nothing. new york's andrew cuomo ended their -- his state's emergency declarations to announce another. gun violence is now the latest health emergency there. but in minnesota, the g.o.p. is fighting back. last week, democratic governor tim also attempted to extend his powers until august .

but republicans who only have a one seat senate majority stayed in special session and force the governor to back down for joining us now, the man who spearheaded this effort, minnesota's senate majority leader paul gesell code. sir, you all have a liberal governor, democrat-controlled statehouse, and this limit stomach slimmest of margins in the senate. how did you outmaneuver them? >> first of all, he wanted them well into the fall. we dragged him to august 1st and then finally to july 1st. and frankly, the powers were so vast. he funded abortion and eviction moratoriums and -- everything he could think of he took away from us and our liberty and then set up a hotline to turn and people that violated the rules. it just was well, well beyond what a governor should be doing. and so the end, i was willing to -- able to work out a deal with the house democrats to end the

emergency powers against his wishes, and that -- we are the only divided legislature and the whole country, so is a really big deal. it's all about building relationships and stopping bad things. >> laura: this is at a time, senator, that we have had this enormous explosion of violence. the breakdown of law and order in the twin cities area. the racial question bubbling. people just want to get back to life, back to work. so why was he trying to hold onto these powers? why was he doing this? >> the why, i have no idea either will then you get used to having all the power. and i do think that taking away people's liberty was part of why we had such violence and anger throughout minnesota. and this is a nationwide problem. i went to a meeting with 70 leaders, state leaders, from around the country. all of them talked about emergency powers being abused. our governor and a lot of

democrat governors have used them far, far more than republican governors. and so we'll have to stand up. we have to stand up for our liberty and we did and in minnesota and we did it by getting democrats to agree with us. and i think that's a good model for the rest of the country. >> laura: senator, i think that people got really demoralized when the extensions of closures continued, school closures, all the sports that were needlessly canceled. and so they felt hopeless. and so your message to republicans across the country tonight is if you can do it in liberal minnesota, how about other states? pennsylvania to try to beat the powers back as well, but other blue states, hope there is well. >> and its importance. think about the importance of the legislative branch working with the executive branch. if the executive branch thinks i can do everything and then you put that in the democrat state, they're just going to run rush over the people. the people -- the day we did it,

july 1st, it was just like a celebration. i thought maybe we should end date on the fourth of july to make it an extra good celebration, but it's something we have to look at in the future too. were going to look at legislation next year that doesn't allow the governor to keep it unless -- either the house or senate agrees. >> laura: going to check on this executive to the authorities. out of control. the governor in illinois coming gretchen whitmer in michigan. all of them need to be shut down and those ledgers have to get involved. senator, you're leading leading the way, and thank you. maybe that's the next governor of minnesota. and now from the state senator for former president, president trump finally decided it was time to take off the gloves against big tech and he announced a major class action lawsuit against facebook, twitter, and youtube today. and google. alleging that the companies are essentially acting as a quasi-state actors. the trump seeks an array of damages and an end to the suppression of his free speech

rate on the lord is leading this next. exclusively. stay there. we recognize that eny demand is growing, and the world needs lower carbon solutions to keep up. at chevron, we're working to find new ways forward, like through our venture capital group. backing technologies like electric vehicle charging, carbon capture and even nuclear fusion. we may not know just what lies ahead, but it's only human... to search for it.

♪ ♪ >> there is no better evidence that big tech is out of control than the fact that they banned the sitting president of the

united states earlier this year. if they can do it to me, they can do it to anyone. this censorship is unlawful, it's unconstitutional, and it's completely un-american. >> laura: former president trump today announcing he is leading a class action lawsuit against facebook, google, and twitter, the three big tech companies, that suspended him, as you may recall, after january 6th. they claim that they violated his verse memorized by the lawsuit was filed and a southern district of florida. they seek injunction relief and damages from a group of americans harmed by the social media company's decisions to silence him. joining me now john cole, one of the groups lead attorneys. john, good to see you. explain and layman's terms for us how you can answer the claim that these companies -- they are just private enterprise. not to government actors that are constrained otherwise by the constitution. >> okay. the supreme court over the years has defined what makes one a

government actor. and there's actually -- by encouraging is one of the prongs of it. and they did that when they gave these companies immunity. they gave its way before they even existed, which makes it safely. but they have encourage them by giving them immunity to do things that congress can to themselves. congress can't censor you. also, like coercion. when all those democratic senators over the last year, year and a half, kept threatening these companies. if you don't do what we say and van trump, sensor trump, sensor there -- we will maybe tear you apart. we might take away your immunity. whatever. but the supreme court has said you can't chorus them to do

those things. and the other thing you can't do is participate in government actions as fauci did with facebook an end cdc did with twitter and facebook. if fauci or the cdc want to say something or give their opinion, that's one thing. but they do not have the right as government entities to censor people who may have a different opinion. so what they did is they farm that out to facebook, twitter, and google. and they can't do that. that makes them state actors, which means that the first amendment, freedom of speech, applies. >> laura: when zuckerberg wrote that note to fauci that just came out three or four weeks ago and all those emails came out, remember there is that paragraph toward the end of the note.

it was lauding fauci's leadership under covid. this paragraph that was all blacked out. and when you read -- you read the rest, it seemed like it might have been referencing we to do better to crackdown on misleading claims. that's where it seems like that probably would go. just my guess. but that would be dispositive, perhaps, toward your claim that they are colluding together to use their favorite word is a quasi-state actor. are you going to move to try to get that paragraph on blacked out? >> absolutely. >> laura: unredacted. >> get that paragraph unblocked. the thing is there is on a lot of other evidence that the cdc, fauci, and others, nih, worked with these companies to censor things. >> laura: the legal analyst out there, the tv lawyers, are claiming that this is -- this is kind of frivolous claim that you have raised.

watch. >> case is dead on arrival. and i think president trump and his lawyers know it. i think this is more of a p.r. stunt then a legal case. >> laura: that's a former u.s. district attorney, she thinks the lawsuit has no legs. >> that's really curious for somebody who just found out about it a few hours ago. i wish i was that smart. we have worked day and night through the months to put it together, but, you know, she is much smarter than i am. probably you are too. who knows. >> laura: one thing that the immediately came out with, and this was not surprising. person afterwards, we don't need to play the montage. this is just a fund-raising ploy, john. this is donald trump trying to raise money. somehow you have a class action, but you're going to take money for the class action, legal, and use it to advance, i don't know, trump's political ambitions for the future or something like it.

>> it was really sad is the hatred for donald trump surpasses all reason. behind me at that stage today should have been the alc -- aclu, which is going -- who knows where they've gone. they've sued for them and it's ridiculous that the left -- the left doesn't understand they are getting for conservatives this week, and five years, they are going to the liberals. you can't have this kind of unrestrained free-speech taken away like this. it's really disgusting. >> laura: one would think that the republicans might have when they had the majority, paul ryan is the speaker of the house, to have the majority in both houses, there were a lot of conservatives, especially saying it's time to break up the tech companies. it wasn't done. everyone was trying to be buddy

buddy with zuckerberg and even president trump has those guys at the white house, side or on the table, knotted together. is he regarding that now? >> yes, he has. i've talked to him about that. one of the things that's really sad is this is prior restraint. that means i'm going to gag you before you talk because i think i might know what you're going to say. the supreme court hates that. as you know, you've been to the supreme court, it it hates prior restraint. donald trump is under prior restraint every hour of every day now for six months and another two years or whatever it is. >> laura: how many people in the class total? speak up we don't know yet. thousands. they are coming in out of the woodwork. nobody knew it existed. so right now we have about 75, 80 people but it will go into the thousands. and then we have to identify

them as part of the class action suit. >> laura: john, we are going to be obviously following this. thank you so much for joining us tonight. and you heard a lot about the threat of white supremacists from doj and others. what about black separatist? a police stand last week in a massachusetts got scant coverage but we have stunning new detail later in the show. and yesterday, the head of the teachers' union claim they don't teach article race theory in the school. raymond arroyo has his hands on some of those lessons plans andh he exposes them all on "seen and unseen" next. are waking up to what's possible with rybelsus®. ♪ you are my sunshine ♪ ♪ my only sunshine... ♪ rybelsus® works differently than any other diabetes pill to lower blood sugar in all 3 of these ways... increases insulin... decreases sugar... and slows food. the majority of people taking rybelsus® lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7.

people taking rybelsus® lost up to 8 pounds. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration which may worsen kidney problems. wake up to what's possible with rybelsus®. ♪ please don't take my sunshine away ♪ you may pay as little as $10 per prescription. ask your healthcare provider about rybelsus® today.

my name is douglas. i'm a writer/director and i'm still working. in the kind of work that i do, you are surrounded by people who are all younger than you. i had to get help somewhere along the line to stay competitive. i discovered prevagen. i started taking it and after a period of time, my memory improved. it was a game-changer for me. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. spewing is time for our "seen and unseen" segment. where we expose the big cultural stories of the day. and for that, we turn to raymond arroyo. raymond, the american -- having their annual conference. and they vowed yesterday to sick lawyers on parents who have oppose critical race theory. >> and today and the name of

honest history and promoting critical thinking, the union invited a doctor to address their teachers. >> we live in a dangerously racist society. there are racist ideas that are swirling around, that are teaching darker skinned kids that there is something wrong with them because of the color of their skin. there are ideas that are swirling around teaching white kids that there is something right about them because of the color of their skin. >> laura, there's a simple racial lesson we should learn. we are all children of god. we look different, but we should look inside the person and watch their actions, judge based on that, not on the external wrapping. that's all a child needs at that point. and the president of its made this statement. watch this. >> critical race theory is not

taught in elementary schools or middle schools were high schools. >> but today during their close breakout session, racial diversity and white culture, using picture books were antiracist teaching. the aft website description reads "in this session will address tactics and tools that teachers can use to promote antiracist teaching methods from reading culturally responsive books to learning about implicit bias in the classroom." so the union suggests using this -- it's intended to four to 8-year-olds. it's called something happened in our town. and it it features a cop shooting. the book says "the cop shot him because he was black. they don't like black men." the question is, what impact does this have, this kind of story, on a child's attitudes toward police? and contrary to what the doctor said, the book leads with skin color is being determinative of whether a person is good or bad.

this is not what kids need to be marinating in at school. >> laura: well, aside from all of that, which is -- his commentary that he get paid handsomely for it, i can even imagine how much he gets paid for most of it. he says racism is swirling around teaching. and what kids are taught they are right because of -- what is happening question mike i think he needs to start naming the schools where that has been happening before he arrived on the scene. the aft is also recommending the picture book, not my idea, it's about white men. it teaches white kids they have privilege and contribute to white supremacy. raymond, you have to check your white fragility right here, raymond's. >> again, we are doing exactly what he is condemning. but we are teaching my kids they are bad because they are white. i don't understand what needs to

happen -- what needs to happen, laura, we need to show great black and white lies, abolitionists and founding fathers like john adams, and people like nat king cole and louis armstrong and sport stars. we need to see the firmament of the races that made america what it is. and let kids make that determination. they will see the struggle and the progress. i went to show you this. this is a minneapolis teacher aft teacher at the top of tonight session. look. >> i'm just a schoolteacher. i didn't know that we would be in the middle of a revolution. but knowing that we have the support of the union, my fellow teachers, i am so proud. >> laura: is that the syllabus? she can do whatever she wants in her private time or protest or whatever. that's fine. but is that the classroom? or are we just dispensing with

formal teaching completely? again, much of what they are doing is racist, they claim it's antiracist, executrix. most of it is racially effecting kids mind-set and i think -- a lot of it is very negative and it's sad. i think it's sad. there are great black writers, great black thinkers, all of them should be highlighted. but don't demonize people based on race. it is just wrong. raymond, thank you for bringing it to our attention. and there was pretty shocking event is past weekend that you might not have even heard about. a group known as the rise of the moors militia held a eight hour standoff in massachusetts appeared how prevalent and this group and why are you hearing more about them? two men with eminent knowledge of these groups are here next with detailed.

the musical >> is about 4:00 a.m. we have been out since 1:53:00 a.m. it is july 3rd 2,021. we are in north america. morocco. we are on the interstate i-95. near exit 57.4. >> laura: just bizarre.

this weekend, at 11 heavily armed men wearing tactical gear and claiming exemption from u.s. law and state law shut down part of the massachusetts interstate during a traffic stop. they say they are part of a group that calls himself the before. and say they are on their way to "training." the entire ordeal ended after an eight hour long standoff with police. and for reference, the capital breach lasted about three hours. some of the members were arraigned yesterday in what became a pretty chaotic. teary to hearing. >> i'm not guilty i am a nationalist

>> laura: is a reasonable question to ask. why isn't this being covered by the media, and what else do we need to know about them? joining me now are two meant we know these types well. todd, former massachusetts state trooper, and chris, former fbi assistant director. todd, you know this group. i'd never heard of this group of four. but you know them well from your time as a state trooper up there. what can you tell us? >> i think we first need to point back to sovereign citizen ideology. and what's important about that is recognizing the recruitment tools in the propaganda that is used by the rise of the moors and other moorish groups such as this and that they will point to things such as the treaty baiting the mic dating back to

777. i've also seen dates of 1787 which was the treaty be time the united states in the country of morocco. what that treaty was about was about maritime laws that allowed privilege of the united states and the privileges for the moroccan country -- there maritime to support privileges based on economic, not treaties for citizens, but economic reasons. just like sovereign citizens will also use maritime laws in order to confuse law enforcement during motor vehicle stops. so what we have to understand that they don't recognize themselves as sovereign citizens. however, their ideology is closely aligned to solve your stomach sovereign citizen ideology. >> laura: very bizarre. here's what one of the men said about their supposed rights.

>> laura: chris, again, i think most people are just shocked by this. also shocked but maybe not all that shocked that the media gave it a pretty much a big yawn over the weekend. again, what do americans need to understand about this? >> these groups emerged in the '90s in different iterations of the moorish nation, sovereign nation. what have you. i dealt with them when i was the head of the fbi in north carolina pray they don't recognize any authority whatsoever. but they are basically a criminal organization or a set of criminal organizations that wrap themselves in some convoluted political ideology. basically to justify committing crimes. and the crimes they commit, they are prolific fraudsters. they will take over someone's

home, file quitclaim deeds and move into the home while they are not there. they commit tax fraud, false tax returns. they killed over a dozen police officers since 2002. in particular, baton baton rouge, louisiana. one individual killed three officers and killed three others. but they present a clear and present danger to law enforcement and nobody should take them lightly. they are in some benign political organization. that's just a facade. >> laura: and todd, another member spoke about what they claim were there travel plans. >> our vehicle is full of camping equipment which supports how we are going to our private land to train which is our second amendment right. >> laura: what kind of training are they doing and they seem to both cite the constitution and then kind of

claim they are not really beholden to any laws that are passed constitutionally. it's a very odd dynamic. of picking and choosing what they will be held accountable by and two. >> and that's the argument, they say they are not -- that they are not antigovernment, but to chris's point, they spur to run with their language, their ideology. they make reference to that they are independent of the law, not antigovernment. to me if you are not following the laws of the u.s., then you are antigovernment. but regarding the ideology as they would speak to traveling, they say it's their god-given right to travel, that's why they don't need drivers licenses. so again, the split here is they find this way to manipulate words and make the words basically justify their actions. what we are seeing with -- on

social media, the flag and all these different things. this is going to be a propaganda recruitment tool. they are going to use and leverage this to gain other people and interests. we don't know how many are out there. there are conflicting numbers, but watch and see the level of interest that this most recent incident over the weekend will gain the attention. >> laura: we have heard a lot from our fbi director and from the attorney general of the united states about the growing white supremacists threat in the united states. growing domestic terrorist threat. i've never heard of these guys mentioned and yet in daytona a couple of weeks ago in florida, a black paramilitary individual shot and killed a daytona police officer. this doesn't fit the narrative of charlottesville or the white supremacists and everything that

they obsess on, so i owned we really understanding more about them and why doesn't the federal government speaking out about this? >> as you mentioned, they present a danger to law enforcement. they don't recognize any authority, but yet, they are not recognized as extremist. even southern poverty law center backed off on that. they had been classified as a sovereign nation and almost had to make domestic terrorist group but they backed off and said they are antigovernment. i don't know why it doesn't cut both ways. it should. this is a black extremist group primarily, and we can come out and say that. they don't recognize any authority. i really think they are more a criminal organization than they are political, ideological base. i think that you said to justify their crimes because that's pretty much all they do. >> todd, chris, very interesting. thank you so much. >> laura: and up next, to big angle announcements. so stay there.

♪ ♪ >> laura: two big announcements tonight on the angle. our own mike baxter -- and wife welcome andrew. it joins big brother is mikey and curtis. in other big news, thanks to your purchases of all of our freedom matters gear on my website, lauraingraham.com, we raised more than $17,000 for rachel's challenge last month. just amazing. let's keep it going every month. we have a new cool thing, okay? here's the new freedom matters tote bag all made in the usa, and the new red freedom matters have, get some good t-shirts. we make as much as we can in the united states, and this month charity is the horatio alger foundation. scholarships offered to high school students who might not otherwise be able to go to

college. integrity, perseverance, some of the characteristics that need scholarship awards. all of the proceeds from freedom matters gear goes to a new charity every month. keep it up. that's all the time have tonight, greg gutfeld takes it all from here. >> here's my vision, it just came to me. picture the border, we build a wall, we've built a tall, big -- a beautiful wall. we have the wall go for miles. >> greg: it's a shame he didn't build a wall around the nursing home, you freak. ♪ ♪