hering's tucker. -- here's ♪ ♪ >> tucker: a good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." the show specializes in the obvious, that's what we do. so tonight we would like to begin with the most obvious observation of all. force works. if you decide to make people do something, if you demand they do it, and punish them if they don't and generally they do it,a they will comply. they don't really have a choice. if you tell them they have to take a dose of experimental medicine, otherwise i can't have a job and their kids can't be

educated, most of them will in the end take it. according to the latest cdc data, 67% of all american adults have received the coronavirus faxing so far. 67%. that's a huge number in a country like this one. try to think of anything else that 67% of all adults have done recently. for perspective, only about 24% of the country's population voted for joe biden in november and that was enough to make hims the president of the united states. so in some ways the administration has done something amazing. get the vaccine or else, that was a message from day one. and most people did it, but not everyone did. there are still holdouts, these are not people that haven't heard of the vaccine or can't afford it or just can't find the dose, it's free. it's everywhere and the media never stop talking about it. every news hour is fis or commercial. so these are people that just don't want to take it. many have already recovered from covid and have active

antibodies, they don't need the vaccine. should people take medicine they don't need it? apparently they don't think so. others have a religious objections, back when leaders acknowledged god's more powerful than themselves. still others may have noticed the vaccine was developed very quickly, the first universal coronavirus vaccine ever still has to this day not received fda approval. maybe that gives them pause, who knows? maybe there are other reasons like the stunningly-death rate or reports of young people developing cardiac emergencies in response to it. he could be all of the above. we didn't have an estimate at this point it doesn't matter. the biden administration is no longer accepting excuses. the secretary of health and human services, not a doctor but a politician, announced he plans to make every last american take this drug. if you don't take it you will wind up on a government list. >> i would if you can answer

that criticism, it's none of the government's business knowing who has or hasn't been vaccinated, what do you say? >> perhaps we should point out that the federal government has spent trillions of dollars trying to keep americans alive during this pandemic so it is absolutely the government business, it's taxpayer business. >> we want to give people the sense that they have the right to choose what we hope they choose to live. >> tucker: we want to give people the right to choose but unfortunately we can't, no freedom for you. it's an odd thing to say on many levels but especially now, this pandemic is waning. few people are dying from the virus at this point and it's hardly a health emergency now. the argument is spending so much money on the coronavirus that the biden administration has the right effectively to go door-to-door and intimidate you into taking the vaccine and keeping track of you if you

don't. the government paid so they have that right and if you disobey you are choosing death. so savor the reasoning here for a moment. it's hard not to think that we have reached a major new precedent, something was happening. as it happens, the federal government spends huge amounts of tax dollars on all diseases, not just covid. cancer, aids, tuberculosis, heart disease, diabetes. each one of these illnesses is its own emergency, kills an awful lot of people and in some cases kills more than covid has. so does the biden administration have the right based on the money they spend fighting these diseases, to her medical information? do they have the right to know your hiv status? can hhs force you to take in about ask for your tb, xanax for anxiety, thorazine for your mania? and while we're at it, where are we letting these peoplewh

reproduce? why are we sterilizing them? some crazy? that's happened before on a huge scale. so in response to the atrocities that have been committed in previous decades, physical autonomy in the right to control the medicine you take, these are the pillars of medical ethics, unofficially. where they were, they no longer are. tony fauci has declared them really a political statement. >> it's easy to get, it's free and it's readily available so, you have to ask, what is the problem? get over it. get over this political statement, just get over it.on we want to get over it, you don't have a right to disagree, you must take this medicine. this is a well trodden road that we are on and it's a scary one. we seen this before more than a centuryce ago.

in the early 1900s, officials in boston and of course decided to make it an example of a swedish born pastor called henning jacobson. jacobson refused to take the government mandated smallpox vaccine. he had taken the vaccine in sweden as a child and had nearly died from it. jacobson fought the mandate and took the case all the way to the supreme court and in the end of the supreme court ruled against him. that was a brand-new precedent then as now and it didn't take long for the president to use that new authority granted by the court to force other medical procedures in the american population. after theti jacobson decision, state of virginia passed a law authorizing involuntary sterilization for the people that state declared feebly minded or mentally ill. -- ruled that the same legalamd mandatory vaccination also

permitted the government to sterilize people against their t will. it was explicit about the connection and here is the quote. tthe principle that can sustain stiff compulsory vaccination is broad enough to consider cutting the fallopian tubes. he wrote. by 1930, thousands of american states were forcing women to undergo involuntary sterilization and in t the end more than 60,000 american women were established by the government against their will. that happened, famously, and we shouldn't be surprised for by it. and when a population allows the government to dictate what medical procedures they get and what drugs they take. this is a well-known and horrifying chapter in american history so you would think the news media might point this out. but, just the opposite. here's a clip from yesterday in which the saddest of the cnn anchor's bags this administration makee vaccines mandatory. >> what about kathleen sibelius, former secretary at hhs?

she talks about the idea that maybe the administration shouldn't completely abandon the idea of, if not vaccine mandates, encouraging some businesses are public places to require them? she says, "i'm trying to restrain myself but i kind of had that, we are tiptoeing around mandates but i want to make sure thati people i deal with don't have it so i don't transmit it to my granddaughter." the wind encourage, if governments can't mandate it, some businesses require it? is to be one of the media demanding vaccination, that shouldn't surprise you. they are in the business of power, and this gives them a little swat. that's literally why they have the jobs they do and they love their new power. what's interesting is that no other organized groups of sensible people who aren't emotionally damaged like your average cable news anchor, none of them are saying anything,yt

either? why not? veterans groups have remained silent as the pentagon with the idea of mandatory vaccinations for all soldiers. this wouldn't be necessary for any health reason whatsoever but they are pushing forward. the pentagon's stop spokesman said that mandatory vaccinations for soldiers could be coming very soon. >> showed the fda to prevent, i'm certain that pentagon leadership will take a look at what our a options got all my cr going forward including the potential option of making mandatory. >> tucker: it making it mandatory. have you seen this movie before? yes. those of us who are over, quarter than 22 remember it well. the u.s. has for soldiers to take experimental vaccines before, it happened in iraq. trips they were forced to take the anthrax vaccine. any of them are eligible for disability benefits because the vaccine cause serious long-term

publications including infertility, lupus, paralysis, blindness, neurological damage. defects were not obvious at first, they took years to surface. but i've seen that military analysts ignore that, and are instead breaking the pentagon to force another unapproved drug on soldier's. if the soldiers don't comply they should be arrested immediately. >> the president has the power to waive that and make those vaccines mandatory. and as he said in the past he was going to leave it up to the military and is much as i respect president biden, i think he's made a mistake in cutting this one. i think he should show the leadership and just go ahead and leave the informed consent requirement to go ahead and make that mandatory just from a system standpoint. and then those who decide that they are not going to take it are literally in violation of a lawful order and they can face consequences under the code of military justice. >> tucker: it you can go to prison for not taking the

vaccine. it's funny, invite someone like that on your show and he says something like that out loud with the television camera in the room and you don't pause and say, excuse me, that's want to see fascism. no one says anything. court marshals for those who refuse to take an extra mental vaccine just after a pandemic ended. so what's going on here? so obviously necessary that it's vindictive. it makes you wonder what this is about. at the very moment that the risk for young people dying of coronavirus has hit essentially zero compare telling us that young people soldiers should be arrested and go to jail if they don't take the vaccine. they are telling us that we should wind up in a government database if we don't comply and government agents could show up and knock on your door. what is happening and what is this about? our experience has talked more about this than anybody we know. what is this? at exactly the moment you think there would be pulling back,ba they have 67% of american adults

a ticket which is a huge number as far as i can tell. they can't stand that 33% haven't. why? >> tucker, i pushed back on the number of 67% because if you look at adults of working age it's 50/50, 18-35 so it seems pretty a clear -- >> tucker: i'm sorry, that went over my head. what's that mean? >> so most people -- the vast majority of people over 65 have taken the vaccine which makes sense, the risk benefit for them to take the vaccine is better, it's more in their favor. if you look at the working age adults it's only about 50% have taken the vaccine and that means that the idea that they were under corporate pressure, they thought they could convince companies to airlines who weren't going to carry people, they were going to make the flight attendants take the

vaccine. in a labor market that's tight, if half the adults of working age have taken the vaccine then companies will back down and you are sort of thing that a little bit around the edges and that means i don't have the leverage that they want. but i'm a small minded thinker and your big mind thinker, you're thinking philosophically. risk-benefit ratio of the vaccines appears to be getting worse by the week. we are seeing vaccine failure on a large scale in israel and the u.k. and scotland. we are seeing myocarditis here and everywhere else, the mrna of vaccines are given. that is you said it looks like the pandemic is winding down in general, although again, in the u.k., cases are way up as the vaccines apparently begin to fail. so why push it now? that's a really good question. whether it's pure vindictiveness or something else, i don't know. i'm always reminded of the

santa ana quote about the fanatic is a person redoubled his efforts when he has lost his aim and it does seem like these people have just lost their aim and are pushing harder and harder. but i will tell you this. they are talking about booster shots, talking about a third dose or more doses. i spoke to somebody today and this is on my sub stack which people can go read if they want which is nice because it's totally exempt from twitter or amazon, my own direct connection to readers. i interviewed someone today who said i signed up for the trial, i got to doses. i signed up for the poster trial and i got a third dose and the third dose was much worse than the first two and i dropped out of the trial and asked me if i wanted a fourth dose. so this is someone who is pro-vaccine dropped out of the trial and didn't want the third dose, i can imagine what that looks like nationally when they start to push back. >> tucker: they are leaving behind the science which i think was written about so incisively and honestly. their behavior is scaring people, this is so crazy that it shaken the faith of most

americans, i think, have in the vaccines. why are they acting like this? this is nuts. >> it is nuts. i don't have a good answer for that. i tend not to believe in conspiracy, i tend to believe people, forro someone in a roomt hhs saying we have to get to 70% by hook or by crook, we are not there, where are we going to do? but with every day that goes by where they lie about them myocarditis and pericarditis data, about a potential third booster being needed to, it becomes harder to think that these arens mistakes. i don't know what the answer is, tucker. >> tucker: i don't either. the fact that they are doing it to college studentss is one of the great outrages of my life. great to see you. so the nsa was reading our email, we told you that a number of times in our only recourse at this point is to file a freedom of information act and forcedey him to explain why they been doing that.

they didn't respond of course, but they did however respond to that journalist who made up for your request on our for your request. we will tell you what happened, next. ♪ ♪

do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a term policy, for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit conventrydirect.com to find out if you policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance.

>> ♪ ♪ >> tucker: well, we have

>> tucker: well, we've been spied on by the biden administration, there's not a lot you can do about it. you can make noise about it and seem outraged but in the end you don't learn about your recourse. if you learn a lot about your democracy when that happens to you, one thing you can do is violent information act request and we did that. we haven't't heard back from the nsa income probably won't for a long time. they did promptly respond however to some joke billionaire funded website. this guy filed a foia request about our foia request. so it's interesting, and it really does kind of crystallized the total degradation of american journalism. the intercept was founded to push back against the surveillance state. it was founded by glenn greenwald and of course now they are busy covering it up and tearing it all in.

you wonder, instead of foiaing our foia request -- you want to wonder what the nsa is doing? that might occupy your time, that might be a virtuous thing to do. it does not occur because of course they support him and his successes. jonathan turley is a law professor at george washington university and knows a lot about the stuff. thanks so much for coming on. now i remember the foia request from the intercept is a lot easier because there's nothing classified that they need to respond to so it doesn't really explain why they filed it in the first place. if you are the intercept and you have some creepy billionaire paying the bills then why not get to the bottom of what the nsa is doing? has it occurred to anyone? >> apparently not a number of people, who have remained relatively silent, that you r would expect to be raising questions. i just testified under the house judiciary committee under the surveillance of reporters andndt

was one of the few times in recent memory that there was bipartisan agreement with all of us who testified as experts, all the members in the room, theyoo agreed that we needed to fully investigate whether generalists were at intercepted. that has not been the response to the story. their hair are a couple of ways that your emails might have been intercepted.e and it would be lawful. you could have been corresponding with one, can someone who is subject to nsa surveillance or that person mayn have forwarded your email to someone who is intercepted but it doesn't explain the more troubling questions. how that information wasla circulated and also how your name was not masked. now, you can unmask people and surveillance documents of that kind but it requires someone to ask for unmasking and there would be no legitimate reason to itdo so here. now if reporters were given that information, it would be even

morein serious because even if your email itself is not classified, the intercept is. nsa and foia material as heavily classified. i do national security work and it takes years for me to get access to afi's i warrant, i should say or an nsa surveillance document. so the mere fact that they engaged in surveillance is classified. it would be a serious drug crime. the question is, why they are -- >> tucker: well, i mean, it's because they intimidate people. everyone is afraid of the nsa. a lot of people now are really afraidt of them. you want to live in a countrytr where people are afraid of your intel agencies? like what is that? why are we accepting this? >> one of the interesting aspects of this is a lot of

people saying, this would be ridiculous. it's not ridiculous, and as i testified just about a week ago and judiciary there is a normal seasonal regularity to this. we have generalists to investigate it in the bush administration, the obama administration, the trump administration and the biden administration. after every one of the scandals there is a requisite apologies, promises of reform and everyone goes away and then the cycle continues. >> tucker: right, how about present time? speaking of it run amok until agency is, they tried to send roger stone a way for the rest of his life or inconsistent testimony but none of these people come they thrive, they get msnbc contracts. jonathan turley, i appreciate your expertise on this. i don't know what your politics are but you've been right on this for many years. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: is been more than six months in january 6, from

the 9/11 of our time, powerful harbor. and we still don't know with certainty who shot ashley babbitt. because in 2021, you can kill people, on armed women, and not of menen who did it. now we are hearing reports that the officer has been identified. we can't confirm them so we are not going to get the person's name. what's interesting is, no one is interested in finding out. in fact if anyone asked the question, who shot an unarmed american citizen, a veteran, a woman. if you asked that question out loud you must be a russian agent. >> you mentioned vladimir putin, one of the more outrageous things that he said was this accusation about ashley babbitt being assassinated. it's a claim that tucker carlson picked up and said, you know vladimir putin has a point. today at two: oh six, the twice

and peach disgraced ex-president sent out a statement with one line. who killed ashley babbitt? the circle is complete from putin to carlson to trump. >> tucker: let's put dumb middle-aged side people on tv. not a good idea. but none of these people could the irony of the core of all this which is a vladimir putin head of security forces execute unarmed women who were protesting his regime, we would correctly call that a terrible abuse of human rights.it who did it? we would say it's a fair question to ask. but ask the biden administration and you are a prudent lackey. so why don't we know basic facts about january 6th? julie kelly who told you repeatedly is one of the very few reporters who has prepped the government to ask those questions. you've done it before but i can't get enough of it.

what don't we know about januart knows? what are they hiding from us in this moment that tells us we need to know more? >> the identity of the federal officer, let's keep in mind that the police department is a federal agency and we don't know the name of someone who shot and killed an american. we are also not privy to 14,000 hours of surveillance video that the u.s. capitol police, you see a common thread here, refuses to make public to the americanop people, may be cheney or nancy pelosi can ask that in that there truth task commission that they are trying to findsi out, what happened on january 6th. those are just a few of the key questions. also, why did u.s. capitol police let people in the door? why did they talk to someone like jacob tinsley has now languished in solitary confinement in jail for six

months and denied release again this week. >> tucker: i'm sorry, jacob was the guy dressed like chewbacca. is he charged with violence? did he commit a violent crime? does vladimir putin keep hundreds of unarmed protesters, does he do that? >> you just completed the circle again. now it's put down to jacob chancellery. it all makes so much sense. he has not committed any violent crime. the judges, so this is d.c. judges and d.c. prosecutors are torturing this man who committed no violent crime but we also need to know why police officers were attacking peaceful protesters outside of capital and provoking them with things like flash bangs filled with rubber pellets, sting balls, dousing them with tear gas. these are just a few of the

questions out of dozens that we need to ask, and again, maybe liz cheney, our friend who pretends to be on our side can pose those questions as part of nancy pelosi's commission. >> tucker: if you are holding people in solitary confinement in a d.c. jail for nonviolent crimes, at some point they become political prisoners. you don't want to hide anything or sensationalized but at what point does it become a political prosecution and why aren't republicann? leaders asking them to? i know mitch mcconnell is pretty busy but we need to ask that question. julie kelly, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: may have an update tonight on the leading presidential candidate from the last cycle. the man who will change this country and rid it of the scourge of trump is him. wewe are speaking of course at e creepy lawyer. his career has been put on pause for two and a half years for good behavior. we will tell you what it is

coming next.

>> tucker: ever notice how heroes >> tucker: ever notice how heroes just emerge, not so much born but just appear out of nowhere. that happened ago don't like years ago in this country and that hero went by many names, we called him creepy porn lawyer, because he was. but back then they called him something different, future president. >> if they decide they value a fighter most people would be foolish to underestimate michael avenatti. >> please welcome attorney n michael avenatti. >> no one has talked to tougher directly to donald trump on tv then michael avenatti and donald trump is afraid to mention hisai name. >> michael avenatti is a beast. >> okay that's true, he's a beast. k >> is a beast and it keeps popping donald trump and all of his folks in the mouth, repeatedly. he may be the savior of the

republic. >> i owe my michael avenatti an apology. for the last couple weeks have send it enough, i've seen you everywhere. i was wrong, brother. >> tucker: those were not cable news clips, that was an iq test and everybody on the tape failed miserably. do not issue them driver's licenses, they are not capable. in a single week in march of 2018 if you remember that far back, msnbc, cnn, and nbc news interviewed the creepy porn lawyer a total of, not making this up, 147 times. like, we got to get in on that, we have to interview the creepy porn lawyer. we only had one opportunity to talk to them in studio, is part of it. you profited from stormy daniels, you've done tens of thousands of dollars in free media based on your relationship with her and she's working and strip clubs. your exporting her and you know that. take her some of what you're

making. >> third, this is absurd. >> tucker: why are you rich and your client is working in cd strip clubs? your on every cable so, you're running for president now. and i know you haven't paid your taxes. like so many lawyers you have taken advantage of her and you pose as a feminist hero because he or she must but you are an exporter of women and you should be ashamed of it. so it wasn't the warmest interview ever, and it even got more unpleasant off air. but we wanted to give you the code or to the story. today the creepy porn lawyer met the fate so many of us knew was coming to him, he was sentenced to 30 months in prison in this case were trying to extort the shoe company nike. he still facing several separate trials including one concerning allegations that he defrauded stormy daniels which he apparently did. the question for us it's basically a political show, what does this mean for creepy porn lawyer's ambitions? is it still what america needs?

thanks so much for coming on, and i should say with some sincerity, i never gloat over a man going to prison because it's sad, it's like someone's death. however if there was ever a guy who had a rendezvous with a cell will inevitably, it was the sky. with that obvious to you as a former prosecutor? >> tucker, we certainly had that intense attorney bluster, that incredible arrogance that use to drive me so crazy across the courtroom when they were performing really for an audience of one, their own client. and today in court, and was apparently, one of the things that drove me most crazy as a prosecutor which was watching the defendant next to me cry and sob it because where was that emotion?

and here was an extortion scheme. but the point s is, that's an extortion scheme for the shoe company. he's going to prison for less than the federal sentencing, ant surprised that you had such a rise in such a meteoric fall. >> tucker: there are all kinds of figures across history that meant the gallows to her death, but aren't you supposed to man up and keep your tears inside it?ne >> they are all beasts. and almost every other criminal, the cried when he faces music.

>> definitely. not just a former prosecutor, but a student of human behavior. great to see you. for a long time, everyone pretended that blm, black lives matter, was not of anti-american hate group. they just want to stop racism. all lives don't matter but they are totally on the level. for the mask is off and now they are saying out loud but they've been saying behind closed doors for a long time. maybe they could step up to them and we will tell you what they said. with free service adjustments and cleaning of your miracle-ear hearing aids for life. we're so confident we can improve your life,

we're offering a 30-day risk-free trial. call 1-800-miracle today and experience the miracle-ear advantage.

>> ♪ ♪ >> tucker: for you huge part >> tucker: for a huge part of last year you are absolutely required it to pretend that blm is about stopping racism. the group that told you that all lives didn't matter was against racism. if you work for some big soulless company you have to say that or they would fire you. people were fired for questioning that and you definitely couldn't point out that blm hates america and was

bent on destroying it. but now you can because blm is saying it. in a public post on the fourth of july the utah chapter of blm described the american flag as "a symbol of hatred." when we black americans see this flag we know the person flying it is not safe to be around. when we set this flag we know the person playing it is a racist. that's a total lie. on every level. meanwhile cnn anchors are also admitting what we've known all along, they hate america, too. >> i think one of the more recent images that we might think of of the american flag being very visible was people on january 6th were storming the capital work beating police officers with it. >> tucker: if you just can't put emotionally unstable and unhappy people on tv and expect it to go well. victor davis hanson is a senior fellow at the hoover institution, one of the wisest people we know and a master of

the big picture. from my perspective, what we are looking at is people with power, most of the power in our country is supposed to be running the country, benefit the country. what's going on? >> it's all vague, racist of this and racist fats that we have methods to adjudicate racism. a minority that makes up a little more than 12 percent does not elect the president of the united states who is black, a racist society would not allow that. it would not allow kamala harris to be vice president. he would not have a race, you would have disproportionate, and when you have interracial crime it would be disproportionately white versus black. if you had a anti-asian hate crimes it would be white people doing that and not black people and yet they don't give us alternatives.

we need details, if we want to adopt the chinese model, the russian model, what model is superior to this? when is the class element. this is not coming out of the civil rights movement, content of our character, and they felt and experienced terrible racism and came out of an impoverished circumstance but my gosh, we are listening to some of the most privileged people in the united states, lebron james, oprah winfrey, then we have they all grew up in upper-middle-class families and they had equal opportunity and were very successful. it's a very different phenomenon, this is like the french revolutionaries who were upper, upper-middle-class or at the or marxists who are upper-middle-class. for the founder of blm, i don't

think you should take the idea that they are being exploited. this is very dangerous because historically we are not the norm, this is a multidirectional democracy and usually they don't work because it's identified by tribe and superficial experience. when you look at the world around us whether it's -- we do pretty well. what they are doing is taking us on a trajectory where we know the end and where it ends up and it's not pretty. especially if you turn one tribe against another, and you have the war against everybody, it doesn't work. >> tucker: and so this country is so systemically racist that togives a free ride

princeton to michelle obama. >> and then what does she do, on vacation from her 12 million dollar washington, d.c., estate and then she tells us that her daughter is in danger walking out on the street when we have this existential problem of 400 people being killed over the fourth of july, 400 being shot, and we were told if we just had african-american mayors or attorney general's or the chief of police, that doesn't seem to help.. we have existential problems that need to be addressed and michelle obama is blaming society for endangering her daughters when she knows, and she's wisely knowing that that she's not going to move back to his chicago mansion, i would be very unwise to give in the state of safety in chicago. and yet no one talks about these existential problems. so this race that's an abstraction among the elite isel

not consist of a concern amongst the poor and marginalized people of the middle cities. >> tucker: or the dying middle-class. pretty soon we will have economic evidence. so we are seeing now in a lot of places the government refusing to enforce the law defunding the police. crime goes up, you are forced to protect yourself, your family and your y property. but we seen this before, a number of times in recent history, in 1982, koreans inng los angeles were attacked because of their race during the l.a. riot. they defended themselves, what did they learn from that experience? we will show you, after the break.

do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a term policy, for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our

retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit conventrydirect.com to find out if you policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance.

>> tucker: >> tucker: police departments all over american art being defunded, so what do you do in response to this? we just made a documentary on this question. we looked at how people survive during periods of chaos and anarchy when the government refused to protect them. at los new orleans, la los angeles, nebraska and talk to people have seen it.

here's a clip from that. >> everybody got back to their car and left. >> it was april 29, 1992. >> korean community has been especially hard-hit by the riding but many inner-city stores are korean owned. c >> where pretty much on our own so what should we do? we have to defend our store. the one that's exactly what he and other korean store owners h did. >> theav only thing i did was protect my story. >> those guys were really tough and really brave. billy, an inspiration to all of us. the documentary is called

surviving disorder and its on foxnation.com right now and we think it's a good one.er that's it for us tonight, we will be back tomorrow. by the way, friday we have an interview with the one man thate silicon valley does not want you to hear from, evolutionary biologist brett weinstein in an amazing conversation. we'll be backk tomorrow night at 8:00 p.m. in the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and groupthink. sean hannity takes over the 9:00 p.m. right now. >> sean: yes, we will be watching tomorrow. i'll come to the "hannity." tonight, all is not while the white house. inflation record levels andmo businesses can't find employees. more lock downs are imminent even supported by the administration and a southern border is an unmitigated disaster. of violent crime is rising in almost every major city in this country. russia is hacking critical supply lines each and every month. china is now threatening the united states, our military and ournd