tv The Ingraham Angle FOX News September 17, 2021 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT
7:00 pm
pray for the family of gabby petito. pray for our fellow americans behind a enemy lines. we will see you back your monday and let not your heart be troubled as laura ingraham is up next. we will see you monday. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> laura: i'm laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight. an accomplished neonatal nurse from new york has quit her job rather than agree to the vaccine mandate. she is here and she's going to tell us why she's taking a stand. but first, sensing off the capital. from moment he decided to run for president, biden has been eager to convince you that he's an aboveboard kind of guy. speak of the vice president harris and diane our entire administration will always be
7:01 pm
honest and transparent with youe good news and the bad. i will always be honest with you. about both the progress we are making on to what setbacks we meet. we just have to keep telling the truth. >> laura: those were just words but now we know they were totally meaningless. 8.5 months into his presidency, we see that right now joe biden is running the government on the need-to-know basis. and the less you know, the better for him. now take a deteriorating situation at our southern border. a few months back, the biden administration band reporters from visiting migrant detention facilities. so much for transparency. the overcrowding, the horrific conditions, the unaccompanied minors -- they didn't want you to see any of it. and yesterday, biden's faa swooped in to oppose temporary flight restrictions over the international bridge. and it was only after pressure from fox was the decision rescinded. you see, they don't want you to
7:02 pm
see the crush of 12,000 plus migrants that want to enter our country at the border. of course, it's not just the denials and coverups limited to the border crisis. general mark milley just admitted to the ap that he did in fact call his pla counterpart. but he claimed it was perfectly within his duty. notice, he avoided saying it was a perfect phone call. he thinks it's fine for military leaders to coordinate and warn our most serious foreign adversary is yet another reason the general should be terminated immediately. he is totally delusional. or drunk on his own power and he should not be trusted with any sensitive information or operational detail. now last night, i don't know if you saw, but senator john kennedy told the "the ingraham angle" six audience that he thought he wouldn't survive this condo controversy, that he would have to throw him under the bus. to be i'm wrong, i disagree with
7:03 pm
that. but i just don't see it. the dems response to every accusation, every scandal is to dig in, deny, deflect, and defend. >> i see nothing and what i've read that would cause any concern. >> the president has complete confidence and his leadership, his patriotism, and his fidelity to our constitution. >> laura: oh, yeah, typically cliche ridden defense. where are the transcripts of these phone calls? that have been going on for apparently five years. where the notes? are members of the press corps suddenly incurious? these were secret negotiations. so china knows exactly what was said. but the american people are going to be kept in the dark. the truth is, the independent media in the united states is dead. it no longer exists. we should just call them the regime media going forward, i think i will. and the biden transparency and
7:04 pm
truthfulness pledge is officially dead. today the administration finally had to own up to the fact that it's drone strike that he referred to as righteous killed ten innocent afghans. now, i'm convinced the administration was forced to finally come out and admit this after "the new york times" report and actual videotape of the carnage was released and the international outcry that followed. they were all involved in this, but they built fences around millie. they cornered him off from accountability. and now, they've rebuilt their fencing around the capital. in another blatant act of security theater. apparently there is a rally that will only attract 700 people. it's not a rally that president trump is attending or urging others to attend, but that is a matter pier the biden people and the democrats are using it as a pretext to dredge
7:05 pm
up more insurrection talk insurrection talk. >> we are predominantly consumers of intelligence rather than producers. well, that is no longer. that is prior to january 6. we have now extended our intelligence operations. >> we've already transitioned into an enhanced security posture. as you can see from the various security measures in place. externally, we've been working with over 25 of our partnering agencies on an integrated plan for this weekend. >> laura: the obsession about this rally, the election of the security perimeter, also has the added benefit of preventing people from having the access to the capital that you rightfully deserve. you pay for it after all. more fences means fewer american citizens get to see how their government actually works. or doesn't. remember, house democrats, house members can still vote from home. remember what i said from the
7:06 pm
start? at its heart, the biden administration is basically just one big calm shop. if they had good news, they would communicate with you about it. but the bad news keeps rolling in. on every level. and they are working overtime to keep it from you. so they are lying to the american people about the border, about what general millie did come about what really happened in afghanistan, and about the significance of this stupid rally tomorrow. joining me now, mollie hemingway, senior editor at the federalist and tammy bruce and ari fleischer, former white house secretary. let's start with you, ari. they were supposed to be the most transparent, truthful administration and american history. what happened? >> [laughs] i disagree with you, laura. i don't think they are one big communication shop.
7:07 pm
i think they are one big teleprompter shop. he can do no communicating on his own paired when he does, it's a most always watched. this is begun -- this has on every policy they've announced, hurt the united states of america. they've helped the taliban, they help people who want to come to america illegally, and now they are about to hurt all americans with their economic policies. so forget communications, it's been a policy failure along every stage of the way. >> laura: molly, i mention the bombshell from the pentagon today about that drone strike. he was the head earlier today. >> i am now convinced that as many have ten civilians including up to seven children were tragically killed in the strike. moreover, we know it says it is unlikely that the vehicle and those who died or are associated or where a direct threat to u.s. forces.
7:08 pm
>> laura: that's not all come officials are saying that no one will be punished. it's worth reminding everybody what general milley said right after the strike. >> we know from a variety of other means that at least one of those people that were killed was a ices facilitator. we think of the procedures were correctly followed and it was a righteous strike. >> laura: imagine if this was trump and his people. your response. speak out at something you think every day, yes beer they say this was a righteous strike. they now admit that they killed up to ten innocent civilians, including seven children. but they said that they are still standing by the intelligence. that makes no sense for the same intelligence community that cooked up the delusional belief that trump was an agent of russia also has bad intelligence here. and no one is ever held accountable. this is something where it's not just about the need to fire people. there are people that are long past needing to be fired, including woke general mark
7:09 pm
miley. this is accountability under the code of justice. otherwise we are no different by the barbarians we oppose. it's very important that when something like this happens that people are held accountable. they are not doing it because all they do -- all they exist is to protect their own regime. but not protect the country. >> tammy, earlier today general mckenzie, who i also asked -- said should be fired. also had the audacity to claim that they have remained very transparent. watch. >> i thought we had a good target. it takes a little while to uncover some of those things. i actually think we worked extremely rapidly to get this information out to the public. >> laura: extremely rapidly! the footage of this drone strike was available within hours on twitter. >> yes, it was being discussed on twitter as being a mistake. the social media world knew that something had gone wrong. and then of course you've got
7:10 pm
this dynamic where as you mentioned, appropriately, that it was "the new york times" that force this. if they didn't do the story come out of that we would've heard anything. then we go back to the first strike that we don't really know who was killed and yet they still insist that someone was. so we don't know if anyone was. we are in a very dangerous position here where when the government says something, we tend to not be able to believe it. and it ends up being wrong or a lie, or when they don't say things, it's a lie by omission, like the efforts to censor the drone footage because of the border. and what this also tells us is that they know what they are doing is wrong. otherwise, why try to hide it. they know they don't want to have people look at this, so they are not proud of it. and yet they still won't retreat. i have a big concern about this -- that no one in the establishment, not any of the heavy hitters are saying wait, something is very wrong here. there needs to be a change, it
7:11 pm
needs to be made. not george w. bush, not obama, not anyone really with real power in congress. there is no unified messaging that well. we seem to be going off a cliff. maybe someone should stop or we should stop and ask some questions and do more than half, you know, sound bites on television. that concerns me. it's as if the shredding of the constitution and an abandonment of the values that the american people expect have been abandoned for quite some time. and now it's just a matter of tapering over it. >> laura: teleprompter readers -- they think they can press conference themselves out of any responsibility here. mckenzie was also asked about the 13 americans servicemen who were killed. watch. >> what do you intend to do about that?
7:12 pm
>> we took every precaution we could. there was also a number of attacks that were foreign, so the silence of those attacks should mean something else also. unfortunately it's very difficult to prove. >> laura: already? >> of course it doesn't. here's the deal. the reason they do this is because the press lets them get away with it. when you watch the news conference today and previous news conferences were something went wrong or even a situation of the border where they banned oversight of both the flights, the press doesn't go into an uproar. when i was in office, it was an instant uproar. it was emotional, it was from the heart, it was a feeding frenzy. they were all practically out of their seats screaming mad. here it is just one and done peer they dutifully asked the question i move onto the next topic. the first question today at t te pentagon wasn't even about an air strike, it wasn't even about general milley pair that is what happens when you have a democratic administration. they take for granted that the press will largely rollover
7:13 pm
because the press almost always does. >> laura: molly come i think what happens, especially if the person responsible is dutifully anti-trump -- we was go back to trump -- then it will be forgotten. that moves me to the hysteria over this rally at that no one i know has heard about or is attending. a democratic congressman who was one of the impeachment darlene speaking out today. >> he remains not just a threat to our democracy, but a public safety threat to the american people. he has made himself a domestic violent extremist movement peer this is not over, they continue to fan the flames. incite violence of this nature. >> laura: molly, basically they want to criminalize the republican party, not just attendees at some rally. the republican party. >> well, there's so many problems with this. yes, this rally -- a lot of people are worried about it.
7:14 pm
the democrats are pretending to be worried about it even though it's just a few hundred people and will probably half full of federal agents and half full of americans who actually do care about the bad treatment of january 6 defendants. but there's something much bigger here, which is our establishment has made it difficult to even redress grievances bid this is a constitutional right, we should be able to peacefully assemble. and by conflating riots on the right with actual important protests, thereby also preserving their power. they want to make it so that nobody can speak out. we have millions of people who were outraged by everything that's going on in this country, whether it's the border, the economy, foreign policy, violation of principal. it's made it impossible for them to speak out in public about these things. and fort pelosi is they are very secure from any public regress, but it's important that people be able to speak and bring their
7:15 pm
grievances to their elected representatives. >> laura: tammy, do you agree that this is in part and intimidation play before the midterms, before the presidential election? don't even try to assemble, because he will be branded a domestic terrorist. >> i think that's the main point. when the fences go up and anybody wants to demonstrate -- and that is at the core at what makes this nation different. it's that you are able to do this and not be disappeared in a basement somewhere in prison. so we are looking at this as a signaling to everyone who is not at the rally, that don't you dare think about doing this. and to the world, the american government is now afraid of its own people. that americans -- you were supposed to be suspicious of american spirit this is a war on us. while you've got those 8-10000 people on the border, perhaps mostly from haiti, while we are flying tens of thousands on vetted from the middle east. and yet it's the american
7:16 pm
people. it's extraordinary and unacceptable. >> laura: they think we are the threat. especially the ones who voted for trump. great to see you tonight. have a great weekend. the cartel has been telling you that vaccinating pregnant women is totally safe. but the study that they were relying on just gave a statement. a neonatal nurse quit rather than take the facts. we don't like she's going to tell us why medical practitioners are hesitant. stay with us. what makes new salonpas arthritis gel so good for arthritis pain? salonpas contains the most prescribed topical pain relief ingredient. it's clinically proven, reduces inflammation and comes in original prescription strength. salonpas. it's good medicine.
7:21 pm
♪ ♪ >> dr. fauci, is there any evidence that the pfizer, mother or not, or j&j vaccines caused any reproductive issues in men or women? >> the answer to that is a resounding no. there is no evidence that it happens, nor is there any mechanistic reason to imagine that it would happen. >> laura: would you be surprised if i told you that fauci might not have his facts straight? of course not come a trick question. my next guest say the science on covid vaccines and fertility is not as clear-cut as fauci clearly wants you to believe. joining us now, dr. byron bridal is associate professor at the university of golf.
7:22 pm
and a professor at harvard medical school peer dr. bridal, what is fauci getting wrong her? >> i'll tell you, something is clearly wrong with that statement. of note is that it is never on scientist to prove the danger of a vaccine. rather, the people rolling out these vaccines to prove their safety. okay, so that's the big difference here. so his statement is incorrect from that perspective. and what i want to point out actually is would you go back to the beginning. these studies were approved based on some very flawed and limited animal studies. we call these prechemical dolomite clinical studies. this is from their own report that they -- there were rats that were used, and the rats are a completely inappropriate model to test the toxicity of these vaccines.
7:23 pm
we expressed a high affinity receptor. that is why we are so susceptible to infection. rats express a very low affinity receptor meaning the virus cannot bind very strongly to themselves. rats are quite resistant to covid-19. so if you use a model that is unable to demonstrate toxicity, it's going to make a new therapeutic agent appear quite safe. even without understood, in their own report they mention that with the vaccinated females, the vaccinated females themselves, first of all, suffered a loss of appetite and their weight gain was reduced following vaccination. worse, there was a twofold increase in the vaccinated rats of fetal lives. >> laura: doctor, you can correct me if i'm wrong, because the new england general of medicine did do some type of report on the vaccines and pregnant women, but they issued
7:24 pm
this correction saying that no denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortion. because at the time of this report, follow up through 20 weeks was not yet available. but the 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days between the last day of the last menstrual. or in the last trimester. so aside from the study they've been relying on with the rats, there was this. but doesn't it usually take years to monitor for adverse reactions? especially given the time it takes to have gestation for a baby and the follow-up thereafter, or am i missing something? this just seems completely off. >> we have to be honest about the things that we do not know. and whenever there's a new vaccine that comes from the market, the issue takes a few years before we have a complete
7:25 pm
picture about those reactions. for example, when the vaccines came out in december, we didn't know about the risks. so we don't know exactly what the risks are. i haven't seen a problem as of yet, but when it comes to birth defects, you need to have -- we don't really have any data on birth defects right now. so when it comes to reproductive health, anybody can get the disease. but there's a difference in risk between josh on mortality risk between the old and the young. vaccines are very important -- but if they haven't had covid, older people should get the vaccines. and of course, if you are -- of course, not that great. so it shouldn't prevent all the
7:26 pm
people from getting this vaccine. speak of the study in "the new england journal of medicine," this was the basis for arguing that there was evide vaccines and pregnant women. this unveiling of the study has essentially been debunked, but the authors made a critical mathematical error that's flown under the radar pair the whole point of this is that the argument, these vaccines have been shown to be safe and pregnant women is gone. the foundation for that messaging is gone. and yet we are mandating these vaccines for pregnant women. it's not appropriate. 100%, we can take the time to study these vaccines properly because there are effective treatment strategies. >> laura: gentlemen, thank you both. covid vaccine mandates are not just morally repugnant, they are beginning to wreak havoc of our health care system. how? this is happened just this week. a small upstate new york hospital announced it's going to stop delivering babies after six
7:27 pm
maternity ward staffers chose to quit rather than take the vaccine. my next guest quit her job as a neonatal nurse. she joins me now. devon lopresti. devon, you are forced to choose against violating your firmly held beliefs and quitting the job you loved. so why did you choose the latter? >> hi, they give so much for having me. i think it was a difficult decision ultimately. but i don't believe that this is the medicine that i want to practice or that resonates with me. when this all rolled out, my husband and i had a conversation and we honestly said we would lose it all before we got the vaccine. and so it is unfortunate that it has come to that -- me losing the career that i worked hard for.
7:28 pm
but it was a decision i knew that was right for me. >> laura: why did you choose it? were you worried about the safety of the vaccine? the fact that -- you are obviously very young, you have very little risk, you look like you are in pretty good shape. was that part of the calculus? >> at this point, i think it's assumed the risk. i know the risk and benefits. and you can see the data. the statistics alone of the survival rate for me, the risk of the vaccine was more concerning to me than getting the virus. and seeing things inside the hospital, hearing coworkers anecdotal experiences. that was enough for me to say that i didn't want it. >> on one of the media's favorite doctors, you might know who we is, says that hesitancy -- the part that you might be feeling come others is feeling -- it's just politics. watch.
7:29 pm
>> the anti-vaccine groups are more empowered than ever. and now it's full on adopted by the extreme right, the political right. and with that brings political action committee, pac money appeared they are stronger than ever. >> laura: devon, are those pushback's doing so for political reasons? i know you know others who are making the same choice that you made. >> i don't pick that's political at all. if we are spearheading protests outside of our upstate new york hospital and it is one of the mt united groups of people we have. we have vaccinated individuals that are anti-mandate pit we have vaccinated individuals who have had awful side effects to the first couple to doses of the vaccine. and nonand nonvaccinated individuals. i don't the good has anything to do with the political background of individuals. it has everything to do with
7:30 pm
bodily autonomy and losing not to write, making the choices what we feel is best for her body. >> laura: also, with children -- they are pushing children to get vaccinated. everything from age to turn up to 12. one word on that? >> terrifying. >> laura: that's a scary way to end it. devon, i hope you are able to go back to your career as a nurse. and i hope it's soon pit we need great nurses bid we have a shortage of cost this country. thank you. >> laura: pelosi trusses america and of mayor attacks one of her own city citizens. raymond arroyo has it. next..
7:32 pm
7:33 pm
7:35 pm
7:36 pm
ray, people are really taking vaccine status to the extreme this week. >> looked, and america, laura, people should be able to decide what we don't like they put in their bodies. but for people like don leman and sarah silverman, it's time for the country to split up. >> why don't we finally just realized that -- just divide up into two or three countries. >> they are believing lies on the internet instead of science. you don't feel that way about polio, mumps, all of the sudden this vaccine is different? what is different about it? >> laura, i will tell you what's different about it. i read a study in several journals of medicine this week. those are called "perfect
7:37 pm
vaccines." they have a 97% perfect rate of protecting you against that disease. then you have leaky vaccines, which is what we are partially dealing with with these covid vaccines. doesn't mean they are not useful, but to use that to segregate americans, to carve them up and somehow say well, this part of the country should be left behind pair that is a wicked, evil thing. based on race, religion, your health. it's an awful thing to even put into the atmosphere. >> laura: i'm young enough to remember that there was proper outcry against people who were trying to shame people with other diseases and our country. >> right. >> laura: on the aids epidemic. it's not acting in a rude way towards anyone who is hiv positive, that was rightly condemned. now suddenly, what is your status? you couldn't card someone at a door in greenwich village on
7:38 pm
that. and people were criticized for saying otherwise. remember he got into that big debate at the time and he had to walk it back. >> all summer carving up the country, the speaker of the house was in the u.k. trashing it. yes, pelosi was out making the case for america. the case that america is overrun with cultists. >> i would say to my republican friends, and i do have some, take back your party. you are the grand old party of america. you've done wonderful things for our country. your health has been hijacked by a cult that is not good for our country. >> but like general milley, pelosi made sure to defend the nation she is most loyal to. china. >> with their continuation of -- with their violation of the cultural mentalistic religious
7:39 pm
priority of tibet with their sun of democracy in hong kong, they are just getting worse in terms of suppression. having said all of that, we have to work together on climate. climate is an overriding issue. >> so laura, let me get this straight. you can suppress religion, suppress free speech, but watch all your sins away if you are willing to agree with us or work with us on climate. she claims half of america is in a cult. come on. >> laura: raymond, she concedes all that other stuff is happening. but they are going to be got on climate. okay. >> don't worry about the way they killed all those babies on those christians. what is amazing, laura, is when these public officials are actually held accountable. by the people. they get very high and mighty. this is our new orleans -- captured at one of the suite
7:40 pm
gives bars in town for the man at the bar respectfully criticizes her handling of the recent storm. now bear in mind, the mayor has instituted a mask mandate or bars and restaurants. watch as she reacts. [indistinct] >> the idea of public service or humility is out the window with these people. has all the grace of a bus hitting one of those massive potholes and her city. to bully a citizen like this, laura, that you supposedly work for and yell at him like he is trash -- it's completely uncalled for. and by the way, if you have a mask mandate and bars, put the mask on. set an example pair the mask can
7:41 pm
only help whatever you are trying to say and make it a little bit agreeable. >> laura: you have an exemption when you are screaming at someone else. >> before we go, remember that moment from the president's press conference with britain on australia? >> thank you, boris. i want to think that fella down under. thank you very much, pal. >> now that powell, prime minister and fellow down under, is responding, laura. >> these things happen. they happen frequently from time to time. the proof of thought is in the pudding. >> the putting is i think in biden's head most of the time. good of him to be so gracious. >> laura: he's paying attention to the submarines they've gotten from the united states. that's the whole deal there. that is what they are doing.
7:42 pm
7:47 pm
>> laura: joe biden's presidency has become kind of an old, leaky rowboat lost at sea. and the russians are running out. to stave off starvation, the white house as per promoting an agenda that has absurd amounts of domestic spending. but don't worry, because none of it is going to cost you a dime. >> this package adds nothing to the debt, nothing to the debt. it is fully paid for by raising taxes on wealthy people. >> my plan is paid for. it's fiscally responsible. because our investments are paid for by making sure the corporations -- that they pay their fair share. >> not only is the white house playing fast and loose with that, with what constitutes wealth, they are jamming regressive taxes through this bill. you will feel the pain, as will your children and grandchildren. but again, don't worry.
7:48 pm
they have a media willing to shamelessly debate themselves to help the democrats sell it. they are the dems representation. a prodigious effort to tax the rich and touching the lives of nearly every american. here with you now, publisher of the photo list. also is cofounder of real pair politics. is it fair to say that biden's presidency hinges on this bill's passage? >> well, that's an interesting question. because i do think that you are going to run into a situation here in very short order next year, an election year, in which the democratic party is going to be able to do very little that they don't do by fiat. this may be the last time that
7:49 pm
biden is able to push through and a significant package in the pelosi congress. and i think that that's something that he is very aware of. it's why he's trying to do and joe manchin's armpit it's why he's trying to really push this through. because it's not really a package that is designed to do anything to really help americans. it's a package that is designed to remake america. in a significant way. notoriously nonbiased and fair a t, quote you mentioned there, it would make him the most signifit democrat president since fdr or lbj. i know this is actually running into a real brick wall right now. his number is are going down, he has a finite window in which to push this through. and i don't think that he's actually going to be able to do it. and part because he hasn't been able to convince any of these holdouts that they should come along with it and they are
7:50 pm
actually more moderate members in the senate who would actually revolt against this if their vote was actually on the line. >> laura: tom, let's go to you on this. i think biden wants everyone else to think that this $3.5 trillion fiasco can actually just do anything. >> are friends talk a lot about inflation. you want to talk about actually lowering the cost of living in this country, my plan does just that. by strengthening the capacity of our economy, almost reducing inflationary pressures over the long run. do something else, my plan does. it confronts the crisis of extreme weather events. >> laura: i must've missed something. it solves inflation and weather? how about that? >> look, i think the inflation as she was one that the biden administration -- they think that if they actually believe
7:51 pm
what biden just said there, i think they are living in a fantasy land. inflation is already showing up. and this is one of the concerns that mansion and other moderates have. the gushing of all this money into the economy, many of which is still sitting there unspent from some of these previous programs, could really cause inflation to take off. if that happens, there was a poll recently that shows the average person -- what they look at to see whether the economy is going well or not. it's not the stock market, it is the price of goods that they pay for at the pump, at the kitchen table. those are already going up. if they were to have something like this, it could get out of hand. it could be really bad. could be bad politics and policy for the biden administration. >> laura: when people say workers who are working have all the leverage, they can get higher wages, that might be true. but then those higher wage guys get eaten up by the increasing cost of gas and basic food and other merchandise.
7:52 pm
so that all kind of ends up getting thrown out in the wash. but i've got to bring up this reuters hole. because it shows that biden's a approval rating on the issue of covid -- first of all, the regular approval rating drop into a massive low, just 44%. and then showing biden underwater on almost every issue. and so much for his covid leadership. it's now at 49% disapprove on covid. but then he was handed a vaccine and the country was basically out of it -- out of it when he took over. and now he's going south in as little as 8.5 months. >> that is why it's so much of the party is trying to lean into the idea that we are still in his panic mode and that something like this $3.5 trillion package needs to be passed. by the way, i love that quote that you used. it's a varnish and ate dessert
7:53 pm
topping. i think that one of the things we can see in these pools is that biden really is not able to sell his agenda to the american people in a way that they will approve of and that they will invest any trust him. what we saw with the obama agenda during his years was his agenda was actually not popular. but that his own personal popularity could overcome that. biden, as it turns out, is not able to overcome that. and people can see what's happening in front of them. they were raking up to the reality around them. he hasn't delivered on the promises that he's made. instead he's blaming them for all of the problems of his own leadership and is in capacity to govern in so many different respects at home and abroad. >> laura: great to see you both night, they keep so much. my old boss, supreme court justice lawrence thomas offered a warming last night. the last bite will explain.
7:56 pm
7:59 pm
>> when supreme court justice clarence thompson speaks, you better listen up. this was his warning about the court strained from its origina mission. >> when we do that, when we begin to venture into political legislative or executive branch lanes, and resolving things, those of us in the federal judiciary with lifetime appointments are asking for trouble, beat we have lost the capacity even i think as leader to not allow others to manipulate our institutions whe we don't get the outcomes that we like. i think the court was taught to be the least dangerous branch, and we may have become the most dangerous. >> while, the most dangerous. wise words of course. on laura ingraham.com, get your
8:00 pm
freedom matters gear. it's all made in the usa. of the proceeds go to the tunne to towers foundation. incredible people running it al in the memory of stephen's billers. i want you to remember that it' america now and forever. have a great weekend. gutfeld is next. [cheers and applause] >> happy friday, everyone. or as kat likes to call it, why am i in handcuffs. something weird is going on as if there jousting and the park like a low-rent
156 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on